DOCSLIB.ORG

Remix Survey 7-6-2010-2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remix Survey 7-6-2010-2 Remix Culture Survey Instrument Which of the following do you currently own? (check all that apply) • High-definition television set • DVD Player • Personal Video Recorder (e.g. TiVo) • Cable/Satellite television connection • Video Game console (e.g. XBOX, PlayStation) • Portable video game device (e.g. Nintendo DS, PSP) • High-speed internet connection (e.g. DSL, cable modem) • Stereo system or portable CD player • Portable MP3 player (e.g. iPod) • Satellite radio (XM, Sirius) • Turntables • Video camera • E-book reader (e.g. Kindle) • Tablet computer (e.g. iPad) • Smartphone (e.g. iPhone, Blackberry, Droid) • A non-smartphone mobile phone (phone calls and text but doesn’t have more advanced features like video and web) How often have you done the following activities in the past month? Never Rarely Sometimes Often Daily or more • Watched TV shows or movies on a TV set (not computer) • Played non-online games on a console (e.g. XBOX, PlayStation) • Played non-online games on a computer • Listened to CDs • Listened to digital music (e.g. MP3s) • Listened to the radio • Read books • Read newspapers or magazines • Download or streamed a movie, television show, or video clip online. • Played a game online • Downloaded or streamed music online For the remainder of this survey, please consider the following definitions: Sample-based media: Creating something different using elements of preexisting media (pieces of music, games, shows, video, text, or photos). There are two specific subgenres of sample based media: • Remix: Adding, taking out, mixing, combining or editing your own elements or effects with preexisting media (e.g. film, music, video games) to produce something different • Mash-up: Combining only elements of preexisting media together (e.g. film, music, video games) to produce something different Which of the following practices have you heard about before? Have you used or consumed the following in the last year? • Music mash-ups, combining two or more songs to make a different song • Music remixes (e.g. adding new instrumental tracks for an old vocal track) • Popular music genres which use sampling (e.g. Hip-hop, Techno, Electronica, House) • Video mash-ups, combining two or more videos (e.g. Buffy/Twilight, "Toy Story 2: Requiem") • TV or film remixes, Adding new edits, elements or effects to existing content (e.g. “Single ladies,” “Downfall/The Hitler meme”, remixed speeches) • Remixes of TV commercials • Anime music videos, in which animation/cartoons are synched to popular songs • Machinima, in which video game characters become "actors" in short films • Video game "mods" in which the look-and-feel of a video game is altered • Video game emulators or ROMs, to play games meant for one platform on another • Manipulated / altered photographs (e.g. morphs, "PhotoShopped" celebrity images) • Software mash-ups, combining two or more separate applications (e.g. adding information to a map) • Blogs in which news, entertainment, technology, or culture are analyzed and discussed • None of the above In the past year, which of the following music-related activities have you engaged in? (check all that apply) • Created a customized play list of songs • Used a music recommendation engine to find music I like (e.g. iTunes Genius) • Burned a CD, copying songs from a computer to a disc • Ripped a CD, copying songs from a disc to a computer • Used a software or mobile application to identify a song (e.g. Shazam) • Shared a play list with others • Shared music files with others online • Created a customized online radio station • Shared my customized radio station with others • Listened to (or watched) music on a site like YouTube or Vevo • Uploaded video taken at a live concert to a site like YouTube or Vimeo • Karaoke • DJ’ed a set using either vinyl or digital recordings • Created a song with samples created by someone else (e.g. VST plugins, commercial drum loops) • Created a song with samples I made • Shared my sample-based music with others • Created my own "sample bank," for repeated use • Shared my sample bank with others • Created my own music remix software or tools (e.g. VST plugins, Max/MSP, Supercollider, Reactor) • Shared my remix software or tools with others • Obtained licenses to remix musical samples • Sold my sample-based music • Sold my samples or sample bank • Sold my remix software or tools • Posted or commented on a blog about music • Updated my status/tweeted about music • None of the above In the past year, which of the following film and television-related activities have you engaged in? (check all that apply) • Accessed "bonus" features on a DVD/Blu-Ray (e.g. deleted scenes, games, commentary) • Created a play list or queue of videos I planned to watch • Accessed hidden "Easter eggs," or secret content, on a DVD/Blu-Ray • Shared my play list or queue with other people • Shared digital video files with others • Copied video from a computer to a DVD or other disc • Ripped video from a DVD to a computer • Used a personal video recorder (e.g. TiVo) to save, organize, repeat, skip or pause video • Contributed to a video-sharing Web site (e.g. YouTube, Vimeo) • Made my own commercial or music video at the official site for the product or artist • Left a video response/comment on another person’s video at a site like YouTube • Created a "mash-up" video, cutting together scenes from TV shows or movies • Created a "remix" video, adding my own edits, effects and/or footage to existing content • Created an "anime music video," synching clips to pop songs • Created "machinima," using video game characters as "actors" • Shared my mixed, mashed, or sample-based video with others online • Created my own video remix software or tools (e.g. Jitter, Isadora, VMX or other VJ software) • Shared my video remix software or tools with others online • Obtained licenses to sample and reedit video • Sold my mixed, mashed, or sample-based videos • Sold my video remix software or tools • Posted or commented on a blog about film or television • Updated my status/tweeted about a film or television show • None of the above In the past year, which of the following video game-related activities have you engaged in? (check all that apply) • Customized a character or environment using options within the game • Used a "cheat" to improve my standing or to unlock secret content • Used a software add-on to improve gameplay • Downloaded a “DLC,” with additional levels, characters, maps or game items • Joined a guild or other online gaming group • Downloaded a mod or fan-created levels • Watched a video clip of a game online (e.g. YouTube) • Posted a video clip of a game to a web site (e.g. YouTube) • Participated in a virtual world (e.g. Second Life, Habbo) • Shared video game software with others online • Manufactured an in-game item (e.g. clothes, weapons) • Exchanged items or currency with other users in-game • Communicated with other players via non-game channels (e.g. IM, phone) • Created a new "level," environment or feature for an existing game • "Modded" a video game, using specialized software to change its look and feel • Shared my mods or levels with other players • Sold my in-game profile, goods or currency in the "real world" (e.g. eBay) • Sold my mods or levels to other players • "Hacked" into a video game's code • Modified an old video game console or cartridge to produce music, art or other non-game artifact • Posted or commented on a blog about video games • Updated my status/tweeted about a video game or games • None of the above In the past year, which of the following image-related activities have you engaged in? (check all that apply) • Used basic software to reduce "red-eye," crop, or otherwise "fix" a photo • Shared a photo with others online (e.g. Flickr, Kodak EasyShare Gallery, Facebook) • Added geographical or personal data about a photo to let others know more about it • Ordered a photo-based product using my own pictures (e.g. calendar, mouse pad) • Used photo manipulation software (e.g. Photoshop) to alter or combine preexisting images • Shared my altered or "Photoshopped" images with others online • Obtained a license to use or alter a photo or image • Sold an altered or "Photoshopped" image • Posted or commented about a photograph on a blog • Updated my status/tweeted about a picture • None of the above In the past year, which of the following political or news-related activities have you engaged in? • Set up a web site to deliver me customized news headlines, articles, audio or video • Signed up for news alerts tailored to my interests • Used social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) to get news • Shared a news story via email or social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) • Shared my own pictures, video or written description of a news event • Signed a petition online • Connected directly to a politician or cause online • Submitted a video question to a politician/media organization (e.g. the CNN/YouTube Presidential Debates) • Remixed or mashed up a political speech, video or event (e.g. Will.I.Am’s “Yes We Can”; Bush/Blair “Endless Love”) • Participated in online activism, disrupting communications or events to express a political opinion • Organized real-world political events (e.g. demonstrations, meetups, flashmobs) via the internet • Posted or commented about news and politics on a blog • Updated my status/tweeted about news or politics In the past year, which of the following software- or application-related activities have you engaged in? (check all that apply) • Customized the programs I use, using the "preferences" or "options" menu (e.g. change colors or layout) • Changed the default home page in my browser • Customized my computer's desktop or phone with a photo or image • Installed "extensions," "plug-ins," or "skins" to add new features to software I own • Shared software with others online • Unlocked secret "Easter eggs" with hidden content or features inside of software • Modified the code of an existing web page or program to suit my own needs • Unlocked or “jailbroke” a device such as an e-book or phone • Created "extensions," "plug-ins," or "skins" for commercial or open source software • Created software "mash-ups" exploring new uses for existing applications (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 the Versions Project: Exploring
    THE VERSIONS PROJECT: EXPLORING MASHUP CULTURE By FRANCESCA LYN SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Benjamin DeVane, CHAIR Melinda McAdams, MEMBER James Oliverio, MEMBER A PROJECT IN LIEU OF THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF 1 MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 2 ©2011 Francesca Lyn To everyone who has encouraged me to never give up, this would have never happened without all of you. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to thank the many people who made this thesis possible. Thank you to my thesis chair Professor Ben DeVane and to my committee. I know that I was lucky enough to be guided by experts in their fields and I am extremely grateful for all of the assistance. I am grateful for every mashup artist that filled out a survey or simply retweeted a link. Special thanks goes to Kris Davis, the architect of idealMashup who encouraged me to become more of an activist with my work. And thank you to my parents and all of my friends. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………….4 ABSTRACT……..………………………………………………………………………………...6 INTRODUCTION..……………………………………………………………………………….7 Remix Culture and Broader Forms………………………………………………………………..9 EARLY ANTECEDENTS………………………………………………………………………10 Hip-hop…………………………………………………………………………………………..11 THE MODERN MASHUP ERA………………………………………………………………..13 NEW MEDIA ARTIFACTS…………………………………………………………………….14 The Hyperreal……………………………………………………………………………………15 Properties of New Media………………………………………………………………………...17 Community……………………………………………………………………………...…18
    [Show full text]
  • Audiences, Gender and Community in Fan Vidding Katharina M
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2011 "Veni, Vidi, Vids!" audiences, gender and community in Fan Vidding Katharina M. Freund University of Wollongong, [email protected] Recommended Citation Freund, Katharina M., "Veni, Vidi, Vids!" audiences, gender and community in Fan Vidding, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Social Sciences, Media and Communications, Faculty of Arts, University of Wollongong, 2011. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3447 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] “Veni, Vidi, Vids!”: Audiences, Gender and Community in Fan Vidding A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy From University of Wollongong by Katharina Freund (BA Hons) School of Social Sciences, Media and Communications 2011 CERTIFICATION I, Katharina Freund, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Arts Faculty, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Katharina Freund 30 September, 2011 i ABSTRACT This thesis documents and analyses the contemporary community of (mostly) female fan video editors, known as vidders, through a triangulated, ethnographic study. It provides historical and contextual background for the development of the vidding community, and explores the role of agency among this specialised audience community. Utilising semiotic theory, it offers a theoretical language for understanding the structure and function of remix videos.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Essay, Mashup, Copy Right
    Referencing in Academia: Video Essay, Mashup, Copy right Eckart Voigts, Katerina Marshfield 1. Introduction: Producing and Podcasting Videographic Material Digital media have established a remix and mashup machine that has generated a rich range of recombinant appropriations (Voigts 2017)— compiled videos, samplings, remixes, reboots, mashups, short clips, and other material involving text, sound, and image — ​typically found (and lost) on web-based video databases. These remix practices raise ques- tions about referencing and copy right in academic teaching, learning and researching environments that have yet to be fully addressed. Five years ago, in their introduction to Transgression 2.0, Ted Gournelos and David Gunkel pointed out that mashup culture tends to operate in a murky, transgressive legal situation: [...] mashup and remixing are patently and unapologetically ille- gal. Produced by appropriating, decontextualizing, and recombin- ing the creative material of others, the mashup is a derivative ‘com- position’ that violates the metaphysical concept of originality, the cultural status of the author and the authority of authorship, and every aspect of intellectual property law and copy right (Gunkel/ Gournelos 2012: 11). In this paper, we will provide a tentative view of the current situation that has grown from a teaching project entitled ‘Producing and Podcast- ing Film Analytical Audio Commentaries’. We will proceed by providing Media in Action | Issue 2/2017 | http://mediainaction.uni-siegen.de 114 Thematic Focus : Copy right Law a short portrait of the project, before focussing on the issues of evaluat- ing and referencing videographic material, remixes and mashups. The aim of the ‘Audio Commentaries’ project was to develop student cultural techniques (in German ‘Kulturtechniken’).
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Universe Fan Videos and the Reinterpretation of the Media
    Alternate Universe Fan Videos and the Reinterpretation of the Media Source Introduction According to the Francesca Coppa, American scholar and co-founder of the Organization for Transformative Works1, fan videos are “a form of grassroots filmmaking in which clips from television shows and movies are set to music.”2 Fan videos are commonly referred to as: fanvid, songvid, vid, AMV (for Anime Music Video); their process of creation is called vidding and their editors (fan)vidders. While the “media tradition” described above in Francesca Coppa‟s definition is a crucial part of the fan video production, many other fan videos are created for anime, especially Asian ones (AMV), for video games (some of them called Machinima), or even for other subjects, from band tributes to other types of remix. The vidding tradition – in its current “shape” – goes back to the era of the first VCR; but the very first fan videos may be traced back to the seventies in a slideshow format. When channel mixers and numerous machines available to a large group of consumers emerged, this fan activity easily became an expanding one amongst the fan communities, who were often interested in new technology, whatever era it is. Vidding has now become a digital process, thanks to the expansion of computer and related technical means, including at least semiprofessional editing software. It seems relevant to point out how rare it is that a vidder goes through editing training when they begin to create fan videos, or even become a professional editor later on. Of course, exceptions exist, but vidding generally remains a hobby.
    [Show full text]
  • SMASH! 2020 ANIME MUSIC VIDEO (AMV) COMPETITION Sponsored by Anime@Abbotsford
    SMASH! 2020 ANIME MUSIC VIDEO (AMV) COMPETITION Sponsored by Anime@Abbotsford RULES AND SUBMISSION GUIDELINES This year we are excited to announce that our SMASH! AMV Competition will be non-exclusive. This means that we are accepting AMVs that have been entered in other competitions and events (i.e. aside from SMASH!) as well as AMVs that have been created specifically for this competition. For more information, please read the following rules and submission guidelines carefully to ensure your entries will be judged and easily managed for the duration of the competition. We will be accepting submissions for the competition from Monday 17th August 2020 to Sunday 27th September 2020, 11:59pm AEST (UTC+10). The results will be announced on Sunday 18th October 2020. The deadline for handing in entries is Sunday 27th September 2020, 11:59 p.m. (UTC+10). Condition: By entering the competition, you are hereby giving your consent for us to use your AMV(s) for SMASH! events this year and any future SMASH! events which include, but is not limited to, AMV events, promotions and/or use in other SMASH! related events. CONTENTS A) SMASH! AMV Competition general rules B) Technical specifications C) How to submit your AMV D) People’s Choice Award voting A) SMASH! AMV COMPETITION GENERAL RULES 1) The SMASH! Anime Music Video Competition is open to everyone in Australia and internationally. Everyone is welcome! 2) A maximum of two (2) AMVs are allowed to be submitted per competitor. 3) Your AMV(s) must be no older than 1 June 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • In Your Dreams
    Core Apprenticeship Library Apprenticeship Sector: Arts & Culture Unit Guide: In Your Dreams In Your Dreams The In Your Dreams unit is a series of inquiry-driven lessons designed to boost students’ sophistication as nonfiction readers. The culminating zine project requires students to integrate information from multiple sources, selecting details to support a central idea. Students will also gain vocabulary skills, including the use of word roots and affixes and an awareness of words’ connotations. Students will learn to “read like writers,” which requires thinking about the choices authors have made in terms of content, format, and word choice. Unit Standards and Objectives Standard #1: Citizen Schools students will prepare a clear written communication. Standard #2: CCSS.RI.6.1: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Standard #3: CCSS.RI.6.2: Determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through details. Standard #4: CCSS.RI.6.4: Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings Standard #5: CCSS.RI.6.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text. Lesson Objectives: ● SWBAT identify the big idea of a text. ● SWBAT identify two details that support the big idea of a text. ● SWBAT provide a brief summary of the text. ● SWBAT read like a writer by thinking about why the author made the choices s/he did, and what the author is trying to get the reader to think, feel, or understand while they are reading.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Case Study: Anime Music Videos
    2. CASE STUDY: ANIME MUSIC VIDEOS Dana Milstein When on 1 August 1981 at 12:01 a.m. the Buggles’ ‘Video Killed the Radio Star’ aired as MTV’s first music video, its lyrics parodied the very media pre- senting it: ‘We can’t rewind, we’ve gone too far, . put the blame on VTR.’ Influenced by J. G. Ballard’s 1960 short story ‘The Sound Sweep’, Trevor Horn’s song voiced anxiety over the dystopian, artificial world developing as a result of modern technology. Ballard’s story described a world in which natu- rally audible sound, particularly song, is considered to be noise pollution; a sound sweep removes this acoustic noise on a daily basis while radios broad- cast a silent, rescored version of music using a richer, ultrasonic orchestra that subconsciously produces positive feelings in its listeners. Ballard was particu- larly criticising technology’s attempt to manipulate the human voice, by con- tending that the voice as a natural musical instrument can only be generated by ‘non-mechanical means which the neruophonic engineer could never hope, or bother, to duplicate’ (Ballard 2006: 150). Similarly, Horn professed anxiety over a world in which VTRs (video tape recorders) replace real-time radio music with simulacra of those performances. VTRs allowed networks to replay shows, to cater to different time zones, and to rerecord over material. Indeed, the first VTR broadcast occurred on 25 October 1956, when a recording of guest singer Dorothy Collins made the previous night was broadcast ‘live’ on the Jonathan Winters Show. The business of keeping audiences hooked 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, promoted the concept of quantity over quality: yes- terday’s information was irrelevant and could be permanently erased after serving its money-making purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Fiction
    Adult Fiction Heroes of the Frontier The Woman in Cabin 10 Dave Eggers Ruth Ware When travel journalist Lo Blacklock is Josie is on the run with her invited on a boutique luxury cruise children. She's left her husband, around the Norwegian fjords, it seems her failing dental practice, and the like a dream job. But the trip takes a rest of her Ohio town to explore nightmarish turn when she wakes in Alaska in a rickety RV. the middle of the night to hear a body being thrown overboard. With his trademark insight, humor, and pathos, Dave Eggers explores Brit Ruth Ware has crafted her second this woman's truly heroic gripping, dark thriller in the Christie adventure, all the while exploring tradition. This page-turner toys with the concept of heroism in general. the classic plot of "the woman no one Brilliant, unpretentious, and highly would believe" with incredible language readable. and fun twists. Also a terrific, ~Alan’s and Leslie’s pick unabridged audiobook. ~Alan’s pick They May Not Mean To, But Barkskins They Do Annie Proulx Cathleen Schine Spanning hundreds of years, this When Joy Bergman's husband dies, ambitious work tells the often brutal her children are shocked that she story of the Canadian and New doesn't agree with their ideas for England lumber industry and all her. The book's title is from a those whom it enriched or displaced. Philip Larkin poem, and this funny and compassionate look at the Annie Proulx’s writing never ceases Bergman family brings Larkin's to thrill me.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Plagiarism & Unoriginal Work
    TYPES OF PLAGIARISM & UNORIGINAL WORK The following information was taken from The Plagiarism Spectrum found at turnitin.com Click to Begin #1 CLONE Submitting someone else’s work, word-for-word, as your own. Previous Next CLONE From a survey of 900 secondary and higher education instructors, on a scale of 1-10, cloning ranks 9.5 and is both the most common and most severe type of plagiarism. Frequency 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Previous Next Cloning is intentional plagiarism and includes: using a friend’s paper from a previous class, purchasing a paper from a paper-mill, downloading a paper you found online, and other instances in which you turn in someone else’s work, unaltered, and claim it as your own. Previous Next #2 CTRL-C Containing significant portions of text from a single source with alterations. Previous Next CTRL-C From a survey of 900 secondary and higher education instructors, on a scale of 1-10, Ctrl-c ranks 8.9 and is the second most common type of plagiarism. Frequency 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Previous Next Ctrl-c is a common process in which although you have written some of the assignment and included your own thoughts, there are still significant portions that match up word-for-word to another person’s writing, without citation. This occurs often when you cull “research” from various sources, when in fact all you are doing is cutting- and-pasting various sentences from various sources to create paragraphs.
    [Show full text]
  • We Have Always Had Mashups, Or Mashing up Transmediality George P
    We Have Always Had Mashups, or Mashing Up Transmediality George P. Landow Brown University, USA doi: 10.7358/ijtl-2015-001-land [email protected] ABSTraCT After examining the intertwined concepts of media, information technology, and mash- ups, this essay draws upon examples from ancient Greek literature based upon orality, Latin scribal culture, and printed poetry to demonstrate that the practice of mash-up is central to our understanding of both media and transmediality. Translating texts originally created in another language and verse form exemplifies one major instance of transmediality, and the way Elizabethan English poets self-consciously borrow, rewrite, and challenge Catullus provide far more wonderfully outrageous examples of mash-up than modern musical ones. Keywords: mashup; medium; transmediality; literary tradition; transliterality; Catullus; poems. The term mashup originally comes from British-West Indies slang meaning to be intoxicated, or as a description for something or someone not functioning as intended. In recent English parlance it can refer to music, where people seamlessly combine audio from one song with the vocal track from another-thereby mashing them together to create something new. – Wikipedia 1. MASHUP, MEDIUM, AND ‘TraNSMEDia’ LITEraCY According to Wikipedia, that wonderful example of text-and-image mashups in a digital, networked environment, a mashup – or mash up or mash-up – “is a song or composition created by blending two or more pre-recorded songs, usually by overlaying the vocal track of one song seamlessly over the instru- International Journal of Transmedia Literacy – 1.1 - December 2015 http://www.ledonline.it/transmedialiteracy/ 67 George P. Landow mental track of another.” According to the Wikipedia article, which contains a useful list of examples, “The original manifestation of mashups in the 2000s was putting an a cappella against a completely different backing track, in order to make a “third song”.
    [Show full text]
  • Mashup Contest: Student Created Video Parodies Mashup Contest
    Mashup Contest: Student created video parodies Anu Vedantham, Director, Weigle Information Commons Dr. Peter Decherney, Assistant Professor, English and Cinema Studies University of Pennsylvania Description: We will showcase digital media success stories in undergraduate classrooms at the University of Pennsylvania that have emerged from the first year of the Weigle Information Commons at the Penn Libraries. We will focus on the creation, organization and results of the 2007 Mashup Contest. Building on the common freshman reading of Lawrence Lessig’s book “Free Culture”, the contest brought together several entities around campus. Students created original video and mashups of commercial video to parody well-known movies. We will show award winning entries and discuss interesting classroom assignments that have emerged. Student-created video is an interesting undergraduate assignment option at Penn, in some cases as an alternative to traditional research papers. Creative video assignments can engage students in high-level critical thinking, writing, planning, scripting and group collaboration tasks. Creative use of space, technology and collaborative assignments can engage students in new ways of acquiring knowledge. Mashup Contest Basics Website: http://wic.library.upenn.edu/workshops/mashup.html Students created a four-minute video parody of a well-known film. Three faculty judges chose the winning entries with a grand prize of a digital videocamera. Spin-off effects have included several faculty incorporating video assignments into
    [Show full text]
  • Alessandro Ludovico
    POSt- DIGITAL PRINT The Mutation of Publishing since 1894 Alessandro Ludovico ONOMATOPEE 77 In this post-digital age, digital technology is no longer a revolutionary phenomenon but a normal part of every- day life. The mutation of music and film into bits and bytes, downloads and streams is now taken for granted. For the world of book and magazine publishing however, this transformation has only just begun. Still, the vision of this transformation is far from new. For more than a century now, avant-garde artists, activists and technologists have been anticipating the development of networked and electronic publishing. Although in hindsight the reports of the death of paper were greatly exaggerated, electronic publishing has now certainly become a reality. How will the analog and the digital coexist in the post-digital age of publishing? How will they transition, mix and cross over? In this book, Alessandro Ludovico re-reads the history of media technology, cultural activism and the avant- garde arts as a prehistory of cutting through the so-called dichotomy between paper and electronics. Ludovico is the editor and publisher of Neural, a magazine for critical digital culture and media arts. For more than twenty years now, he has been working at the cutting edge (and the outer fringes) of both print publishing and politically engaged digital art. ISBN 9789078454878 90000 > 9 789078 454878 POSt- DIGITAL PRINT The Mutation of Publishing since 1894 Alessandro Ludovico ONOMATOPEE 77 1 2 contents Introduction. 7 Chapter 1 – The death of paper (which never happened). 15 1.1 Early threats to the printed medium.
    [Show full text]