The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15453-7 — The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information Index Abbenhuis, M. M., 359 Anthony, Susan B., 388 abolitionists, 5–11, 15, see also slave escape Antietam, Battle of, 80, 259–260, 469 Adams, G. W., 271, 277 Anti-Peonage Act (1867), 334 African Americans army activism of, 480–500 antebellum, 90–91 army troops, 160, 161, 168–169, 382–383 combat effectiveness of, 91–92 colonization efforts, 337, 379, 482, 486–487 Confederate emigration efforts of, 485–486 conscription, 419–424, 428, 508, 518 New York City draft riot, 474 desertion, 429–430 reaction to Emanciation Proclamation, Kentucky campaign, 130–131 448–449 state politics of, 373 treatment as prisoners of war, 299–301, Unionists, 531 303–304, 305 see also guerrilla warfare Union retaliation against mistreatment, Union 245–247 African American soldiers in, 484–485, see also slavery 488–492 African Civilization Society, 485, 498 command, 99–104 agricultural conflict, 251–254, 255, 424–427 conscription, 473–475 albumen print process, 145 eastern theater leadership, 111–116 Alexander, T. B., 425 raising, 98–99, 159–160 Alexandria, 221, 230 army discipline Ambler, C. M., 61 Articles of War, 161–162 Ambrose, S. J., 74, 103 court-martial system, 165–166 American Colonization Society, 28 crimes, 163 American party (Know-Nothings), 30, 32 desertion, 163–165 ammunition, 151 for battle readiness, 169–172 Anaconda Plan, 67 lack of formal, 162–163 Anders, C., 103 punishment techniques and effectiveness, Anderson, Robert, 374 166–169 Anderson, William “Bloody Bill,” Army Medical Museum, 274–275, 290 208–209, 212 Army of Northern Virginia, 127–128, 133, 135, Andersonville prison, 314 259–260, 468 Andrew, John, 488–492 Army of the Cumberland, 100, 108, 109 Anglo-American Treaty of Washington Army of the James, 115 (1871), 364 Army of the Ohio, 109 antebellum army, 90–91 Army of the Potomac, 100–101, 103, 111–116, antebellum Unionism, 526–529 127, 133, 259–260, 471 antebellum violence over slavery, 3–11, Army of the Tennessee, 100, 131–132, 481–482 133–135, 136 545 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15453-7 — The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information Index Army, T., 92 Beckert, S., 335, 353 Aron, S., 6 Bell, A. M., 256 Art of War (Jomini), 65 Bell, D. A., 217 Articles of War (United States War Bell, John, 34, 46, 369 Department), 160, 162, 165–166, belligerent rights, 362–364 168 Bell-Ringers (club), 39 artillery Belz, H., 456 ammunition, 151 Benjamin, Judah P., 513 effectiveness of, 150–151 Beringer, R. E., 118, 119, 425, 501 European made, 343–345 Berlin, I., 16 hot air balloons, 144 Bernath, S. S., 362 Napoleonic era, 148–151 Berryville wagon train raid, 199 pistols, 198 Berwanger, E. H., 5, 7 rifled musket, 92, 148–150 Bigelow, J., 348 as tactical arm, 69 Birkner, M. J., 59 Union advantages in, 92–93 Black, B., 266 Ash, S. V., 217, 218, 219, 225, 532 Blackett, R. J. M., 45, 354, 358 Ashworth, J., 45, 48 Blackford, L. Minor, 527 assassins, 194 Blackman, A., 354 Astor, A., 61, 415 Blair, Montgomery, 373, 385 Atkins, J. M., 56 Blair, W. A., 229, 242, 442 Atlanta, fall of, 88, 109, 135–137, 458, 478 Blanning, T. C. W., 217 atrocities, 245–247, 298–299 Bledsoe, A. S., 98 Auman, W. T., 532 Blight, D. W., 388 autopsies, 276 blockade strategy Ayers, E. L., 4, 5 and Confederate financial difficulties, 348–350 Bailey, Joseph, 199–201 and European neutrality, 361–362 Baird, H. C., 113 and medical supply shortages, 287 Baker, G. E., 35 Union, 95–98, 110–111 Balace, F., 355 see also Union operations Ball, D. B., 348 Blondheim, M., 145 banking system, 175–176, 181 Blum, E. J., 340 Banks, Nathaniel P., 369 Boatner, M., 79 Baring brothers, 347 Bogue, A. G., 378 Barnes, J. J., 359 Bollet, A., 277 Barnes, P. P., 359 bonds Barnett, T. J., 384–385 international, 187–190 Barney, W. L., 52 war, 175–181 Barry, C. L., 346 Bonner, R. E., 352 Bartholow, R., 278 Border South states Bartky, I. R., 145 and antebellum violence over slavery, 3–5 Basler, R. P., 24, 68 geography and commerce in, 3–5 Bass, R. D., 196 prisoners of war, 294 Bates, Edward, 369, 373, 496 slave demographics in, 6 battle deployment tactics, 71 Border States Bauer, C. A., 357 commerce in, 3–5 Baylor, John, 261 emancipation and Lincoln, 446–448 Beatie, R. H., 100 political parties in, 5 Beatty, J., 162, 163 politics in, 5 Beauregard, Pierre G. T., 65, 74–75, 126, 130, slavery in, 5, 465–467 515–516 Unionist army recruits in, 532 Beaver, S. A., 347 Boston activism, 489–490 546 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15453-7 — The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information Index Bowen, W. H., 321, 355 Carroll, D. B., 359 Boyko, J., 328, 332 Case, L. M., 348 Brady, L. M., 255 Casey, Silas, 68, 160, 161 Brady, Matthew, 146 Cashin, J. E., 218, 227, 250, 257, 260, 266 Bragg, Braxton, 70, 74–75, 79–80, 85, 130–135, Castel, A., 92, 209 169, 516 Catterall, H. T., 11 Brazil cavalry, 69–70 Confederate slavery support in, 327 Cecelski, D. S., 499 emancipation in, 338 Central America Breckinridge, John C., 34, 46 defense against European colonialism, 325 Brieger, G., 281 slavery politics in, 335–336 Brinton, J., 270, 275 Chaffin, T., 155, 336 Brock, R. A., 212 Chancellorsville, Battle of, 258–259 Brown, C. H., 336 Chapman, C. B., 272 Brown, D., 535 Chase, Salmon P. Brown, John, 20–21 as 1864 presidential candidate, 387 Brown, Joseph E., 421, 472, 507–510, 535 as presidential candidate, 369 Brown, William Wells, 487 as secretary of the treasury, 175–176, 178, Browning, R., 97 373, 381 Brownlow, William G., 526, 531 as supreme court justice, 391 Brown-Séquard, C.-É., 268 Chattanooga, Battle of, 75–77, 84 Bruce, R. V., 143, 344 Chesnut, M. B., 118, 121 Brugger, R., 4 Chickamauga, Battle of, 108 Buchanan, James Chinese Exclusion Act (1882), 334 election of, 30 Chloroformers (club), 39 and secession, 58–59, 400 Cinco de Mayo, 323 Buell, Don Carlos, 72, 76, 107, 130 Civil War causes Buenger, W. L., 55 antebellum African American activism, Bull Run, Battle of, 160, 270, 468, 515, 516 481–482 Bulloch, James, 345–347 antebellum physical conflict over Burlingame, M., 37, 78, 377, 379 slavery, 3–22 Burnett, L. A., 352 Fort Sumter, 60–61, 119, 374, 400, 528 Burnside, Ambrose, 113, 132, 260–261, 442, 471 see also secession Burt, D. C., 346 Clampitt, B. R., 218, 219 bushwhackers, 194, 202 Clark, Charles, 427 Butler, Benjamin F., 115, 226, 227, 228, 230, 312, Clark, Henry, 509 377, 446 Clark, J. E., 148 Bynum, V. E., 522, 542 Clausewitz, Carl von, 77–78, 80, 83, 116, 414 Clavin, M. J., 335 Cadwalader, George, 439 Clay, Cassius M., 19, 21, 369 Calhoun, John C., 14, 16 Clay, Henry Calloway, M., 282 and antebellum violence over slavery, 8 Cameron, Simon, 104, 369, 373 compromise Fugutive Slave Law, 16 Campbell, D. A., 351 and the Whig party, 27, 28, 29 Campbell, S. W., 18 Cleburne, Patrick, 430 Canada Cloyd, B. G., 314 African American colonization efforts, 482 Cobb, T. R. R., 43 draft dodgers in, 473 colonization efforts (African American), 337, foreign relations with, 328–332 379, 482, 486–487 Capers, G. M., 219 Compromise of 1850, 29 Carlander, J., 50 Confederacy Carlton, E., 223 importance of family in, 524–525 Carpenter, J. A., 110 medicine, 284–288 547 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15453-7 — The Cambridge History of the American Civil War Edited by Aaron Sheehan-Dean Index More Information Index Confederacy (cont.) states’ rights, 430–431 nation-making by, 517 turmoil in, 507–510, 517–518 technological developments, 156–157 Unionism, 526–533 Confederate army discipline white Southern dissent in, 521–525 and desertion, 163–165 Confederate States Medical and Surgical lack of formal, 163 Journal, 288 Confederate Congress, 138, 510–512 Confederate strategy Confederate Constitution, 506 advances on western theater, 81–83 Confederate foreign policy border defense, 514–516 appealing to European humanitarianism breaking Union pulic opinion, 83–84 for aid, 353–355 fiscal, 182–187, 190 King Cotton diplomacy, 352–353 grand strategy for war, 65, 66 promoting cultural superiority to initial battle, 67 Europe, 352 of Longstreet, 85 support of Maximillian’s Mexican offensive, 79–80 monarchy, 324–328 Confederate Conscription Act (1862), 534 support of Union tensions with Canada, Confiscation Act (1862), 231 329–330 Conkling, James C., 450–451 Confederate military leadership Connelly, D. B., 109 generals Connelly, T. L., 122, 131 Beauregard, 118–122, 126, 515–516 Conner, R. C., 108 Bragg, 130–135, 516 Conroy, J. B., 448 Cooper, 121 conscription Johnston, 119–122, 125–127, 516 Confederate, 419–424, 428, 508; Lee, 121, 127–130 recusant, 207 Polk, 122–124, 516 and dissent, 533–538 Sidney Johnston, 121–124 Union, 473–475 president, 67, 79–80, 118, 119–125, 127–128, Constitutional amendments (US) 139, 501–503 First, 442–445 Confederate occupation, 232–233 Thirteenth, 391, 458 Confederate operations Constitutional Unionists (political party), concentration strategy of, 73–77 32–34 guerrilla warfare, 203–211 Cook, A., 364 prisoners-of-war treatment, 293, 297, Cook, C., 218 306–307 Cooke, Jay, 174, 178–180, 190, 191 Confederate politics Cooper, Samuel, 121 Confederate Constitution and states’ Cooper, W., 58, 79, 118, 119, 501, 511 rights, 416–417 Copperheads contentious nature of, 414–415 and conscription law, 473–475 democracy and power holder Democratic, 382, 386, 453, 462–463, restrictions, 417 469–470 dissidents, 533–538 and fall of Atlanta, 478 economic and tax in kind of food crops, on Lincoln reelection, 477–478 424–427 and Overland campaign, 475–477 emancipation, 433–434 and Vallandigham, 474–475 independence of, 417–418 see also Democrats local efforts to feed the poor, 428–430 Corby, W., 167 military conscription law, 419–424, 428 cordon strategy, 66–67, 73–74 passport system, 426 Corinth, Battle of, 80 peace movement, 427–428 Cornish, D.
Recommended publications
  • Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2017 Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schieffler, George David, "Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2426. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2426 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by George David Schieffler The University of the South Bachelor of Arts in History, 2003 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in History, 2005 August 2017 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Daniel E. Sutherland Dissertation Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Elliott West Dr. Patrick G. Williams Committee Member Committee Member Abstract “Civil War in the Delta” describes how the American Civil War came to Helena, Arkansas, and its Phillips County environs, and how its people—black and white, male and female, rich and poor, free and enslaved, soldier and civilian—lived that conflict from the spring of 1861 to the summer of 1863, when Union soldiers repelled a Confederate assault on the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Guerrillas and the Defense of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad
    A Unique Hell in Southwestern Virginia: Confederate Guerrillas and the Defense of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad Nicholas A. Nowland Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History Paul D. Quigley, Chair A. Roger Ekirch Daniel B. Thorp 22 August, 2016 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Civil War; Southwestern Virginia; Guerrillas; Partisan Rangers; Bushwhackers; Home Guards; Guerrilla Warfare Copyright 2016 by Nicholas A. Nowland ii A Unique Hell in Southwestern Virginia: Confederate Guerrillas and the Defense of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad Nicholas A. Nowland ABSTRACT During the United States Civil War, southwestern Virginia was mired in a bloody guerrilla conflict that involved Confederate irregular combatants defending the region from invading or raiding Union Army forces. Simmering for the entirety of the war, this conflict revolved around the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad (V&T), a critical railway that ran through southwestern Virginia and connected the southwestern Confederacy with Richmond and the rest of Virginia. As the war progressed, this railway moved increasingly large amounts of foodstuffs and minerals vital to the Confederate war effort, and by the later stages of the war it was the most important railway in the South. Union Army commanders in West Virginia recognized the incredible importance of the V&T to the Confederacy, and launched a multitude of major and minor invasions and raids into southwestern Virginia with the intent of crippling the railroad. Confederate partisan rangers, bushwhackers, and home guards played separate roles in weakening, distracting, and hampering Union Army operations in southwestern Virginia, thereby helping to defend the V&T from attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2008 Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bright, Walter, "Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866" (2008). All Theses. 363. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/363 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RADICALSIM AND REBELLION: PRESIDENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA APRIL 1865 TO MAY 1866 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Walter Steven Bright May 2008 Accepted by: Dr. Rod Andrew Jr., Committee Chair Dr. H. Roger Grant Dr. Abel A. Bartley ABSTRACT The focus of this thesis deals primarily with the white elite of South Carolina during Presidential Reconstruction. Historians have noted South Carolina radicalism before the Civil War, but I propose that this radicalism did not simply fade away when the war ended. I argue that the Civil War did not destroy white South Carolinians’ will to fight; a sense of nationalism still flourished as they continued to rebel against the federal government, despite the devastating effects of the war on the Palmetto State. This work will show that these white elites continued this fight because they were enraged over the total devastation left in the wake of Sherman’s march through the state and the failure of the federal government to institute an acceptable Reconstruction plan.
    [Show full text]
  • A War All Our Own: American Rangers and the Emergence of the American Martial Culture
    A War All Our Own: American Rangers and the Emergence of the American Martial Culture by James Sandy, M.A. A Dissertation In HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTORATE IN PHILOSOPHY Approved Dr. John R. Milam Chair of Committee Dr. Laura Calkins Dr. Barton Myers Dr. Aliza Wong Mark Sheridan, PhD. Dean of the Graduate School May, 2016 Copyright 2016, James Sandy Texas Tech University, James A. Sandy, May 2016 Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the constant encouragement and tutelage of my committee. They provided the inspiration for me to start this project, and guided me along the way as I slowly molded a very raw idea into the finished product here. Dr. Laura Calkins witnessed the birth of this project in my very first graduate class and has assisted me along every step of the way from raw idea to thesis to completed dissertation. Dr. Calkins has been and will continue to be invaluable mentor and friend throughout my career. Dr. Aliza Wong expanded my mind and horizons during a summer session course on Cultural Theory, which inspired a great deal of the theoretical framework of this work. As a co-chair of my committee, Dr. Barton Myers pushed both the project and myself further and harder than anyone else. The vast scope that this work encompasses proved to be my biggest challenge, but has come out as this works’ greatest strength and defining characteristic. I cannot thank Dr. Myers enough for pushing me out of my comfort zone, and for always providing the firmest yet most encouraging feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War in the Lone Star State
    page 1 Dear Texas History Lover, Texas has a special place in history and in the minds of people throughout the world. It has a mystique that no other state and few foreign countries have ever equaled. Texas also has the distinction of being the only state in America that was an independent country for almost 10 years, free and separate, recognized as a sovereign gov- ernment by the United States, France and England. The pride and confidence of Texans started in those years, and the “Lone Star” emblem, a symbol of those feelings, was developed through the adventures and sacrifices of those that came before us. The Handbook of Texas Online is a digital project of the Texas State Historical Association. The online handbook offers a full-text searchable version of the complete text of the original two printed volumes (1952), the six-volume printed set (1996), and approximately 400 articles not included in the print editions due to space limitations. The Handbook of Texas Online officially launched on February 15, 1999, and currently includes nearly 27,000 en- tries that are free and accessible to everyone. The development of an encyclopedia, whether digital or print, is an inherently collaborative process. The Texas State Historical Association is deeply grateful to the contributors, Handbook of Texas Online staff, and Digital Projects staff whose dedication led to the launch of the Handbook of Civil War Texas in April 2011. As the sesquicentennial of the war draws to a close, the Texas State Historical Association is offering a special e- book to highlight the role of Texans in the Union and Confederate war efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Research Seminar, Keene State College, Spring 2020 The
    1 Civil War Research Seminar, Keene State College, Spring 2020 The Book, Volume 3 Table of Contents Part I. Death and Culture. .and Art Chapter 1. Lydia Hurley, “The Reformation of American Children: How the American Civil War Left a Lasting Impact on the Lives of Children” website Chapter 2. Betsy Street, “Hard Tack, Ham Fat, and Death: Nelson’s Civil War” website Chapter 3. Graham Kaletsky, “Art and the Civil War” website Part II. Medicine and Science Chapter 4. Laura Ruttle, “‘Removed’: American Midwives in the Nineteenth Century and Civil War” website Chapter 5. Timothy Hastings, “Quantifying Inferiority: Scientific Racism, Biological Determinism, and the American Civil War” website Chapter 6. Ryan Goff, “The Evolution of Medicine Due to the Civil War” website Part III. Military and Soldiers Chapter 7. Kyle Gilmore, “Snipping the Sinews of War: How the Union Blockade Strangled the Confederate Economy” website Chapter 8. Cole Tollett, “The Texas Brigade” website Chapter 9. Zachary Grupp, “The Value of Southern Honor: How Confederate Irregulars Became American Outlaws” website Chapter 10. Michael Fremeau, “Pride in One’s Country or Hatred for the South? Why New England Soldiers Fought in the Civil War” website Part IV. Politics and Abolitionism Chapter 11. Amber Hobbs, “Running the Underground Railroad” website Chapter 12. Lydia Mardin, “Political Slavery and Personal Freedom: Federal Legislation of the Underground Railroad” website Chapter 13. Molly Ryan, “The Battle of Abraham Lincoln’s Reelection” website 2 Part I. Death and Culture. .and Art Chapter 1 Lydia Hurley, “The Reformation of American Children: How the American Civil War Left a Lasting Impact on the Lives of Children” It is August 3rd, 1864.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonel John Singleton Mosby & the 43
    Essential Civil War Curriculum | Eric W. Buckland, Colonel John Singleton Mosby | November 2013 Colonel John Singleton Mosby & the 43rd Battalion Virginia Cavalry – “Mosby’s Rangers” By Eric W. Buckland, LTC(R), USA "My purpose was to weaken the armies invading Virginia, by harassing their rear... to destroy supply trains, to break up the means of conveying intelligence, and thus isolating an army from its base, as well as its different corps from each other, to confuse their plans by capturing their dispatches, are the objects of partisan war. It is just as legitimate to fight an enemy in the rear as in the front. The only difference is in the danger ..."1 — Col. John S. Mosby, CSA Perhaps no other individual’s name from the War Between the States is more inextricably intertwined with the unit he commanded than John Singleton Mosby. That unit, the 43rd Battalion Virginia Cavalry, was commonly known as Mosby’s Rangers. It was, unquestionably, his command. Certainly, it bore his name, but more importantly, the unit’s inception, expansion, successes and viability up to the final days of the war were a direct result of his operational vision, audacity, self-confidence and stoic endurance. Mosby commenced irregular operations with just nine men loaned to him by Major General James Ewell Brown “JEB” Stuart in early 1863. At that time, Mosby had no rank and was a scout for Stuart. On April 21, 1865, having achieved the rank of Colonel, Mosby would disband rather than surrender his command which contained over 800 men. In 1992, Colonel John Singleton Mosby was a member of the first group of men honored with induction into the United States Army Ranger Hall of Fame.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Mosby's Confederacy': Reconstruction in Fauquier County, Virginia Brett .D Zeggil Clemson University
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2015 The aN ture of Guerilla Warfare in the Heart of 'Mosby's Confederacy': Reconstruction in Fauquier County, Virginia Brett .D Zeggil Clemson University Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zeggil, Brett .,D "The aN ture of Guerilla Warfare in the Heart of 'Mosby's Confederacy': Reconstruction in Fauquier County, Virginia" (2015). All Theses. 2155. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2155 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NATURE OF GUERILLA WARFARE IN THE HEART OF “MOSBY‟S CONFEDERACY”: RECONSTRUCTION IN FAUQUIER COUNTY, VIRGINIA _________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History _________________________________________________________________ by Brett D. Zeggil May 2015 _________________________________________________________________ Accepted by: Dr. Paul Christopher Anderson, Committee Chair Dr. Rod Andrew, Jr. Dr. Richard Saunders ABSTRACT During the American Civil War, Colonel John S. Mosby launched one of the most successful guerilla campaigns for the Confederate war effort. “Mosby‟s Confederacy,” a section of northern Virginia that encompassed four counties, came under the control of Mosby, and what would eventually become the Forty-third Battalion Virginia Cavalry, from 1863 through the end of the war. One county in particular, Fauquier, Virginia, served as the base of Mosby‟s operations. The partisan style of warfare, that Mosby employed, demanded a significant amount of participation and collaboration from the local citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • William Fletchercox
    William Fletcher Cox David Bagwell’s Great, great grandfather [the grandfather of my grandfather J.W. Goff] M, b. 20 February 1834, d. 2 October 1911 William Fletcher Cox went by “Fletcher”. He was born on 20 February 1834 near Ozark, Dale County, Alabama. He was the son of William Cox Jr. and Milly Dowling. William Fletcher Cox married Martha Ann Bush, daughter of John Prescott Bush and Mary Frances Johnson, on 25 December 1853 at Skipperville, Dale County, Alabama. He was a member of the 53rd Alabama Regiment for the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. 1 On April 21, 1862, the Confederate Congress passed the Partisan Ranger Act. The law was intended as a stimulus for recruitment of irregulars for service into the Confederate States Army during the American Civil War. On February 17, 1864 the Partisan Ranger Act was repealed after pressure from Robert E. Lee and other Confederate regulars persuaded Congress to repeal the act. Overview of the 53rd Regiment, Alabama Partisan Rangers: 53rd Regiment Partisan Rangers was organized at Montgomery, Alabama, in November, 1862. Two of its companies had seen prior service with the 7th Alabama Infantry Regiment. Men of this command were from the counties of Autauga, Lauderdale, Macon, Pike, Coosa, Tallapoosa, Dallas, Monroe, Wilcox, Lowndes, Dale, Coffee, and Montgomery. It first served in the District of the Gulf and in December contained 517 effectives. The unit was later assigned to Roddey's and M.W. Hannon's Brigade, Wheeler's Corps. The Unit saw action at Thompson's Station, Brentwood, and Town Creek, was involved at the Atlanta Campaign, then participated in the defense of Savannah and the campaign of the Carolinas.
    [Show full text]
  • Guerrilla Warfare in Western Virginia During the Civil War Lauren Michelle Milton [email protected]
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2019 Civil neighbors to violent foes: guerrilla warfare in western Virginia during the Civil War Lauren Michelle Milton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Milton, Lauren Michelle, "Civil neighbors to violent foes: guerrilla warfare in western Virginia during the Civil War" (2019). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1196. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1196 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CIVIL NEIGHBORS TO VIOLENT FOES: GUERRILLA WARFARE IN WESTERN VIRGINIA DURING THE CIVIL WAR A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History by Lauren Michelle Milton Approved by Dr. Michael E. Woods, Committee Chairperson Dr. Kevin Barksdale Dr. Robert Deal Marshall University August 2019 ii © 2019 Lauren Michelle Milton ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION TO DAVEY Thank you for everything. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As this thesis reaches its completion there are many people that I owe the deepest thanks. First, I cannot express enough gratitude for my fiancé, Davey. You have been by my side since day one of this journey and have been nothing short of a constant pillar of support.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" X 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A ccessing the World's Information sin ce 1933 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8812226 Gray ghostbusters: Eastern theatre Union Counterguerrilla operations in the Civil War, 1861—1865 Beamer, Carl Brent, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1988 by Beamer, Carl Brent. All rights reserved. UMI SOON. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • William Clarke Quantrill and His Biographers
    142 KANSAS HISTORY A “Fiend in Human Shape”? William Clarke Quantrill and His Biographers by Barry A. Crouch n Friday morning, August 21, 1863, a band of 440 men, comprising William C. Quantrill’s 150 man contingent, 40 men under William T. “Bloody Bill” Anderson, Andy Blunt with 100, another 100 or so recruits commanded by Confederate Colonel John Holt, and 50 locals from Bates and Cass Counties (Missouri), entered Lawrence, Kansas. This group, the “largest such force ever assembled Ounder one command during the entire Civil War” according to Albert Castel, demolished Lawrence, a town of three thousand to four thousand residents (second in size to Leavenworth). Edward E. Leslie estimates 200 killed, which left behind 85 widows, 250 orphans, and two million dollars worth of destroyed property, in- cluding 182 buildings and 100 residences.1 The leader of the raid, William Clarke Quantrill, has been the scourge of writers on Kansas–Missouri his- tory and has fascinated a whole host of historians. A tantalizing and elusive character, Quantrill has hypnotized investigators for the past century or so. Born in 1837 as Andrew Jackson left the presidency and dead shortly Barry A. Crouch is a professor of history at Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C. The author of various books and articles on Texas during Reconstruction, his most recent publication, co-authored with Donaly E. Brice, is Cullen Montgomery Baker: Reconstruction Desperado (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Universi- ty Press, 1997). The author expresses his thanks to his son “Bear” for his editorial expertise and to the reviewers of Kansas History for their timely comments.
    [Show full text]