DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Rights, Private Use Permits and Forest Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Rights, Private Use Permits and Forest Communities Land Rights, Private Use Permits and Forest Communities Land Commission of Liberia Prepared with the support of EU Project FED/2011/270957 Paul De Wit, Consultant April 2012 Table of Contents 1. Context ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Land Use Rights ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Land tenure rights..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Importance of PUP issuance..................................................................................................... 4 2. Background to Private Use Permits ............................................................................................. 5 3. Inventory and assessment of PUPs .............................................................................................. 6 3.1 Legal nature of underlying land rights ....................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Public Land Sale Deed .......................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Aborigine Land Grant Deed ................................................................................................. 7 3.1.3 Public Land Grant – Tribal Territory Deed ........................................................................... 7 3.1.4 Other legal tools ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.5 Conclusion on the legality of private ownership entitlements ................................................ 8 3.1.6 Issuance date of private ownership rights .............................................................................. 9 3.2 Areas covered by PUP contracts and underlying land rights .................................................... 10 3.2.1 Land area under a PUP contract is smaller than the underlying land rights area................... 11 3.2.1.1 Communities, FDA and land use planning .................................................................. 11 3.2.1.2 Erosion of community property rights ....................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Land area under a PUP contract is larger than the underlying land rights area ..................... 14 3.2.2.1 Revision of the deeded area ....................................................................................... 14 3.2.2.2 Issues of extending land use beyond the right ............................................................. 15 3.2.3 Land area under a PUP contract corresponds with the underlying land rights area .............. 15 3.3 Who are the people? Land holding communities; their representations and community dynamics ............................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3.1 Historic and present community land owners ..................................................................... 18 3.3.2 Community land owner representation and representation tools ......................................... 19 3.3.3 Community identity, land ownership dynamics and representation issues at work under PUP contracts ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.4 Preliminary conclusions on land owning community institutions and their representation .. 23 4 Preliminary conclusions .............................................................................................................. 24 4.1 A way forward for handling PUPs .......................................................................................... 24 4.2 Community Land Policy Issues ............................................................................................... 25 i Table 1 - Present and Pipeline land use right issuance ........................................................................... 2 Table 2 – County PUP distribution .......................................................................................................... 4 Table 3 – Land rights used for formalizing private use permits .............................................................. 8 Table 4 - Dates of land grant deed issuance ........................................................................................... 9 Table 5 – PUP rights area as compared to underlying deed rights area ............................................... 10 Table 6 - Collective land owners original deeds compared to collective landowners as PUP signatories ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 Box 1 – Case study of the collective public land sale deed of the Geetroh Chiefdom in Sinoe County 12 Box 2 – Case study of the public land grant deed of the Tienpo Chiefdom in Grand Gedeh county ... 13 Box 3 – Irregular situation of a PUP issued over and beyond a public land grant deed ....................... 15 Box 4 – Institutional community dynamics at work .............................................................................. 20 Box 5 – Matching granted deeded and signed PUP areas with administrative/community territories 22 ii 1. Context The Land Commission (LC) is undertaking inventory work on land tenure and land use rights that have been acquired, granted or issued by the state over time. It is also assessing the use and management of these rights by its holders, local government structures and public institutions. This work is foundation laying to underpin a number of land sector processes for which the LC has direct responsibility, including: (i) the development of a coherent and holistic future land use policy which may culminate in a national land use plan, (ii) a concession land rights and land use policy as part of an overall concession policy, (iii) the drafting of new property rights legislation to deal with private, public and community land. The inventory work focuses on the following categories: Land use rights 1. Agricultural, Mining and Forest Concessions; the latter include Forest Management Contracts – FMC, and Timber Sales Contracts – TSC; 2. Private Use Permits -PUP; 3. Community Forests Management Agreements - CFMA; 4. Protected Areas. Property rights 5. Aborigine Land Grants and Collective Public Land Grants; 6. Collective Public Land Sales. 1.1 Land Use Rights Preliminary results indicate that the different land use rights categories issued by the State to mainly commercial entrepreneurs, to communitiesi, or to itself (in the case of protected areas) represent in excess of 50% of the total land area of Liberia (see Table 1). In fact they will determine land use patterns for many years to come, as most of these use rights have been issued for a period of 25 years or more. The situation of longer term committed land use becomes more problematic when consideration is given to pipeline land use rights allocations, ie. these that are already planned by the Government of Liberia (GoL), but still need to be formalized. These include up to another six Forest Management Contracts, in excess of 30 Timber Sales Contracts, six Community Forest Management Agreements, eight Protected Areas. The situation in the mining sector is less clear. The total area under exploration licenses is close to an eightfold of the present production areas. Existing Agricultural Concessions contracts such as Golden Veroleum and Sime Darby provide opportunities for an extension of contractually agreed areas. Conservative projections indicate that the State has committed itself to issue longer term land use rights over an area that corresponds with some 75% of the total Liberian land mass. Even taking into account that some of these land use rights are not necessarily mutually exclusive, it remains a major challenge to manage this situation. 1 Table 1 - Present and Pipeline land use right issuance Actually issued Land Use Right (hectares) PRESENT Agricultural Concessions – AGRIC 1.140.408,00 Forest Management Concessions - FMC 1.007.266,00 Timber Sale Contracts - TSC 65.000,00 AGRIC TSC Community Forest FMC CFMA Management Agreements – 126.785,00 CFMA Other MIN Mining Concessions - MIN PUP 113.256,00 Private Use Permits - PUP 2.239.630,00 Protected Areas - PA 193.932,00 PA Total 4.886.277,00 % of Liberian Land Mass 50,95% Potentially to be Land Use Right issued (has) PIPELINE Agricultural Concessions – AGRIC 1.140.408,00 Forest Management Concessions - FMC 2.270.097,00 Timber Sale Contracts - TSC 230.000,00 AGRIC Community Forest Other Management Agreements – 194.102,00 CFMA FMC Mining Concessions – MIN PA 113.256,00 PUP Private Use Permits – PUP 2.239.630,00 TSC Protected Areas – PA CFMA 1.037.865,00 MIN Total 7.225.358,00 % of Liberian Land Mass 75,33% 2 1.2 Land tenure rights Estimates on the coverage of the different categories of collective property rights (categories 5 and 6) are more difficult to make at the early stages of the inventory. The inventory work has so far focused on different sources of information including: FDA inventory work in 2007, when the Authority launched a campaign for collective entities providing evidence of their land ownership entitlements (aborigine land grants and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberia BULLETIN Bimonthly Published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia
    LibeRIA BULLETIN Bimonthly published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia 1 October 2004 Vol. 1, Issue No. 4 Voluntary Repatriation Started October 1, 2004 The inaugural convoys of 77 Liberian refugees from Sierra Leone and 97 from Ghana arrived to Liberia on October 1, 2004, which marked the commencement of the UNHCR voluntary repatriation. Only two weeks prior to the beginning of the repatriation, the County Resettlement Assessment Committee (CRAC) pro- claimed four counties safe for return – Grand Cape Mount, Bomi, Gbarpolu and Margibi. The first group of refugees from Sierra Leone is returning to their homes in Grand Cape Mount. UNHCR is only facilitating re- turns to safe areas. Upon arrival, returnees have the option to spend a couple of nights in transit centers (TC) before returning to their areas of origin. At the TC, they received water, cooked meals, health care, as well as a two-months resettlement ration and a Non- Signing of Tripartite Agreement with Guinea Food Items (NFI) package. With the signing of the Tripartite Agreements, which took place in Accra, Ghana, on September 22, 2004 with the Ghanian government and in Monrovia, Liberia, on September 27, 2004 with the governments of Si- erra Leone, Guinea and Cote d’Ivorie, binding agree- ment has been established between UNHCR, asylum countries and Liberia. WFP and UNHCR held a regional meeting on Septem- ber 27, 2004 in Monrovia and discussed repatriation plans for Liberian refugees and IDPs. WFP explained that despite the current food pipeline constraints, the repatriation of refugees remains a priority for the Country Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Gender-Based Violence and Health Facility Needs Assessment
    WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION SEXUAL GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND HEALTH FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT (LOFA, NIMBA, GRAND GEDEH AND GRAND BASSA COUNTIES) LIBERIA By PROF. MARIE-CLAIRE O. OMANYONDO RN., Ph.D SGBV CONSULTANT DATE: SEPTEMBER 9 - 29, 2005 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AFELL Association of Female Lawyers of Liberia HRW Human Rights Watch IDP Internally Displaced People IRC International Rescue Committee LUWE Liberian United Women Empowerment MSF Medecins Sans Frontières NATPAH National Association on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Womn and Children NGO Non-Governmental Organization PEP Post-Exposure Prophylaxis PTSD Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder RHRC Reproductive Health Response in Conflict SGBV Sexual Gender-Based Violence STI Sexually Transmitted Infection UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organization 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Problem Statement 1.1. Research Question 1.2. Objectives II. Review of Literature 2.1. Definition of Concepts 2.2. Types of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence 2.3. Consequences of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence 2.4. Sexual and Gender-Based Violence III. Methodology 3.1 Sample 3.2 3.3 Limitation IV. Results and Discussion A. Community Assessment results A.1. Socio-Demographic characteristics of the Respondents A.1.a. Age A.1.b. Education A.1.c. Religious Affiliation A.1.d. Ethnic Affiliation A.1.e. Parity A.1.f. Marital Status A.2. Variables related to the study 3 A.2.1. Types of Sexual Violence A.2.2. Informing somebody about the incident Reaction of people you told A.2.3. Consequences of Sexual and Gender Based Violence experienced by the respondents A.2.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • River Gee County Development Agenda
    River Gee County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia 2008 – 2012 River Gee County Development Agenda bong County Vision Statement River Gee: a unified, peaceful and well-governed County with robust socio-economic and infrastructure development for all. Core Values Building on our core competencies and values, we have a mission to support Equal access to opportunities for all River Gee Citizens; Assurance of peace, security and the rule of law; Transparent and effective governance; Sustainable economic growth; and Preservation of natural resources and environment. Republic of Liberia Prepared by the County Development Committee, in collaboration with the Ministries of Planning and Economic Affairs and Internal Affairs. Supported by the UN County Support Team project, funded by the Swedish Government and UNDP. Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS........! iii FOREWORD..........................................................................! iv PREFACE!!............................................................................. vi RIVER GEE COUNTY OFFICIALS............................................! vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................! ix PART ONE - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1.!Introduction................................................................................................! 1 1.2.!History........................................................................................................! 1 1.3.!Geography..................................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROJECT Fifth Year External Evaluation
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROJECT Fifth Year External Evaluation (PIO 669-0165-3-60047) Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development Monrovia, Liberia Submitted by: University Research Corporation 5530 Wisconsin Avenue Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 IQC Contract No. PDC-1406-I-00-7113-00 December 1987 LIBERIA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROJECT Fifth Year External EvaluatiGn December 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae Acknowledgements i Team Composition ii Acronyms I ,Introduction 1.A Purpose of Evaluation 1 i-E Evalua.tion Methodology 1 2.0 Execut iye Summary 3 3.0 Findings 7 4.0 SER PHC Fro.iect 4.A Village Developrnent Committees 12 4.D Village Heaith Worker T"lrai ;i: and Effectiveness 16 4.C The Reolvr1, Dn-u_] Fund 21 4.) Supervisicn 29 4.E The Referral Ss:eem 6 4.F Decentralizotioi 40 4.G Financial Viability of Che VHW 54 Frogram 4.H General 61 5.0 Recommendations 72 6.0 Annexes 6.A Persons tnterviewed 6,B Scope of Wcrk b.C Documents Consulted 6.D Survey Questionnaire TABLES ACKNOWLEDMEMENTS The team would like to express its appreciation for the adminis­ and trative and logistics support provided by the SER PHC Project the staff of USAID/Monrovia, and the openness and candor with The which the SER PHC Project was discussed with the team. evaluation was further assisted by the extensive efforts of the MHSW, CHS in Grand Gedeh and Sinoe, MEDEX and USAID to provide all relevant documentation. TEAM COMPOSITION Harry Feirman, Ph.D, Team Leader Health Management Specialist University Research Corporation David Collins, F.C.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter ISSUE # 16 for Media Internews
    http://www.usaid.gov/ https://www.internews.org/ http://www.healthcommcapacity.org/ Media Newsletter Information Saves Lives Issue #16 - June 27-July 3 http://on.fb.me/1NM9DKt/internewsliberia Welcome to the Internews Newsletter for media in Liberia. This newsletter is created with the intent to support the work of local media in reporting about Ebola and Ebola-related issues in Liberia. Internews welcomes feedback, comments and suggestions from all media receiving this newsletter and invites them to forward, share and re-post this newsletter as widely as possible. Three confirmed Ebola cases and 237 contacts in Margibi County This week one Ebola death and two additional live virus]. The Ministry of Health also does not rule out Ebola cases were confirmed in Liberia. Two individuals the possibility that the boy had sex with an Ebola were transported from Nedowein community to the survivor that transmitted the virus. Ebola Treatment Unit at ELWA. This makes the total of The Minister of Health, Bernice Dahn disclosed that three confirmed cases in Liberia. In total, 237 contacts when the boy began showing symptoms he visited a of the victims have been listed by the Ebola Task Force of Montserrado District four. According to Deputy clinic and got tested for malaria. He was tested positive Minister Nyenswah, there is no reason for panic as ‘the for malaria and was sent to his mother’s house in outbreak has been contained locally in the Nedowein Nedowein community. The boy appears to be moved community in Mama-Gaba district in Margibi County’. from his mother’s house to his father’s house in Smell th Five households are considered ‘high risk’ by the No Taste, where he died on the 28 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Recovery: Rebuilding Liberia's Health System
    a report of the csis global health policy center The Road to Recovery rebuilding liberia’s health system 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Richard Downie E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org August 2012 CHARTING our future a report of the csis global health policy center The Road to Recovery rebuilding liberia’s health system Author Richard Downie August 2012 CHARTING our future About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and de- velop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s pre- eminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. John J. Hamre became the Center’s president and chief executive officer in 2000. CSIS was founded by David M.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Two Systems of Surveillance Operating in Burundi at Present
    LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2017 1 LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) April 2017 This publication was prepared by Stephen Browne and Amadou Diop for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), in collaboration with the Liberian Ministry of Agriculture, USAID Liberia, WFP, and FAO. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Page 2 of 60 Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Background and Introduction......................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 8 National Livelihood Zone Map .......................................................................................................12 National Seasonal Calendar ..........................................................................................................13 Timeline of Shocks and Hazards ....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Freedom of Information in Seven Liberian Counties
    Freedom of Freedom of Information in Information in Action: Action: Advancing Freedom Advancing Freedom of Information in of Information in Seven Liberian Seven Liberian Counties Counties “...access to information is indispensable to genuine democracy and good governance and… no limitation shall be placed on the public right to be informed about the government and its functionaries.” Preamble, 2010 Liberian Freedom of Information Act This guide is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of The Carter Center and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. Photo Credits Pewee Flomoku: cover, pages 4,7,9 Deb Hakes: page 16 Catherine Schutz: page 12 Alphonsus Zeon: county coordinator photos on pages 7-9, 13-16 The Carter Center: pages 2, 9, 10, 11, 15 “...access to information is indispensable to genuine democracy and good governance and… no limitation shall be placed on the public right to be informed about the government and its functionaries.” Preamble, 2010 Liberian Freedom of Information Act Table of Contents Introduction 5 Grand Gedeh County: Poor Communities Benefit from County Development Funds 7 River Gee County: Freedom of Information Provides Avenues for Understanding 8 Bong County: FOI Compels Provision of Information on Development Projects 9 Meet George Toddy 10 New Bridges for the Community 11 Lofa County: Freedom of Information Enables Meaningful Participation and Action 13 Grand Bassa: Demand Leads to Automatic Publication of County Expenditures 14 Rural Montserrado County: FOI Request Accelerates Hospital Construction 15 Nimba County: FOI Request Exposes Illegal School Fee Collection 16 Introduction Liberia’s Freedom of Information Act, signed into law on September 16, 2010, provides all persons the right of access to public information.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia
    United Nations S/2011/757 Security Council Distr.: General 7 December 2011 Original: English Letter dated 30 November 2011 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia, and in accordance with paragraph 6 (f) of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010), I have the honour to submit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia. I would appreciate it if the present letter, together with its enclosure, could be brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Nawaf Salam Chairman Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia 11-60582 (E) 141211 *1160582* S/2011/757 Enclosure Letter dated 18 November 2011 from the Panel of Experts on Liberia addressed to the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia The members of the Panel of Experts on Liberia have the honour to transmit the final report of the Panel, prepared pursuant to paragraph 6 of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010). (Signed) Christian Dietrich (Coordinator) (Signed) Augusta Muchai (Signed) Caspar Fithen 2 11-60582 S/2011/757 Final report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia submitted pursuant to paragraph 6 (f) of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010) Summary Arms embargo The Panel of Experts identified one significant arms embargo violation committed by Liberian mercenaries and Ivorian combatants in River Gee County in May 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia…………………………………… 7 2.1.2 National Policies for Reconstruction and Development………
    Environmental & Social Impact Assessment of Lot 2 of the Zwedru – Harper Road Project (Karloken - Fish Town & Harper Junction – Cavalla) CONTRACT NO.: LBPWP-IIU-MPW/ICB/006/2012 GRANT No: 2100155010817 OCTOBER 2013 ESIA for Lot 2 of the Zwedru – Harper Road Project October 2013 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………… i 1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………… 1 1.1 Background……………………………………………………… 1 1.2 Project Location………………………....……………………… 1 1.3 Scope of the ESIA……………………..………..………………. 2 1.4 Project Goals and Objectives………..………………………….. 3 1.5 Terms of Reference………………………….…………………. 3 1.6 Environmental Assessment and Sustainability ………………… 4 1.7 ESIA Study Methodology……………………………………… 4 1.7.1 Environmental Impact Assessment……………………………… 4 1.7.2 Social Impact Assessment ……………………………………… 4 1.7.3 Stakeholder Consultations ……………………………………… 5 1.7.4 Public Consultations……………………………………………. 5 1.8 Structure of the Report…………………………………………. 5 2.0 POLICY, LEGAL & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ……. 7 2.1 Policy Framework ……………………………………………… 7 2.1.1 Land Right Policy of Liberia…………………………………… 7 2.1.2 National Policies for Reconstruction and Development……….. 7 2.1.3 National Environmental Policy…………………………………. 7 2.1.4 National Transport Policy and Strategy………………………… 8 2.1.5 Integrated Water Resources Management Plan………………… 8 2.1.6 National Forestry Policy……………………………………….. 9 2.1.7 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan……………….. 9 2.1.8 National Environmental & Occupational Health Policy…………. 9 2.1.9 African Development Bank Group’s Policy on the Environment 10 2.1.10 African Development Bank Integrated Safeguard System……… 11 2.2 Legal Framework ……………………………………………… 11 2.2.1 The Liberian Constitution………………………………………. 11 2.2.2 Environmental Protection Agency Act…………………………. 12 2.2.3 International Conventions and Agreements…………………… .
    [Show full text]
  • Land Commission Consultations
    Republic of Liberia REPORT 2010 Land Commission Consultations Land Commission Consultations 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was compiled and written by the Program Staff of the Technical Secretariat of the Land Commission (LC) under the guidance and supervision of Mr. Stanley N. Toe, Land Policy and Program Development Officer. The Technical Secretariat extends its profound appreciation and gratitude to Chairman Brandy and other Commissioners of the LC for their unflinching support to this undertaking from the inception stage to the conclusion. We also acknowledge with thanks, the vital role played by Mrs. Guglielma da Passano, UN-Habitat Technical Advisor to the Land Commission in providing editorial guidance and useful feed- back during the entire exercise. An array of individuals and institutions also contributed immensely to the successful conduct of the county meetings. We hereby mention some of their names in recognition of their contributions in the form of financial and logistical support: the Minister and staff of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), superintendents and local officials of the counties, our international partners in particular, the UN-Habitat for providing the funding and logistical support for these consultative meetings. Also, the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) for logistical and related support during the consultative meetings in Nimba, Bong and Lofa Counties respectively and the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL). Finally, to the participants from the various counties, normally unheralded and acknowledged in matters such as this, we say in the proverbial Liberian jargon ‘thank you yah’ for taking time off your engaging schedules to honor our invitation to participate in these meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Sime Darby and Land Grabs in Liberia French Banks Financing Land Grabbing
    Sime Darby and land grabs in Liberia French banks financing land grabbing FACTSHEET | APRIL 2013 for the people | for the planet | for the future The case What is Sime Darby doing in Liberia? Malaysia-based Sime Darby, one of the world’s largest • On July 23, 2009 Sime Darby signed a 63-year lease producers of palm oil, is developing palm oil plantations in agreement with the government of Liberia, for 311,187 Liberia, swallowing up farmlands and forests used by local hectares (about 760000 acres) of land which is referred to as communities to sustain their livelihoods. the Gross Concession Area. The contracts for land concessions signed by Sime Darby and • The government agreed to allocate land ‘free of the Liberian Government violate several Human Rights encumbrances’ to Sime Darby, with the understanding that principles in conventions ratified by the Liberian Government the company would cultivate 220,000 hectares within as well as principles enshrined in Liberian Law. Affected twenty years of signing the agreement. communities and civil society have organised to demand from • The company agreed that it would pay US$5 per hectare per the company and Liberian Government that communities’ year for land it cultivates for oil palm and provide rights are recognized and the contract between Sime Darby employment for more than 30,000 Liberians. and the Government are renegotiated to ensure that it is compliant with these human rights principles and laws. • In 2010, Sime Darby started operations in western Liberia, Sime Darby Plantation is the agri-business division of the Sime cultivating land to set up an oil palm nursery.
    [Show full text]