The Monochrome Print Version

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Monochrome Print Version December 2010 onomica tr l A s s A s e o s c i o a J t i EPHEMERIS o n a n S SJAA 1980 occultation observation of a SJAA Activities Calendar satellite of asteroid (216) Jim Van Nuland Gene A. Lucas November (late) detector. Holiday Party follows. Observations of a satellite of asteroid 21 Fall Swap. Open at noon, selling See page 5. (216) Kleopatra made 30 years ago by 1:00 to about 4:00 p.m. In the SJAA members, Gerry Rattley and Bill hall at Houge Park. January Cooke, have now been substantiated 26 Astronomy Class at Houge Park. 1 Dark-Sky weekend. Sunset 5:01 professionally. 7:30 p.m. Topic is “What You p.m, 5% moon rises 5:59 a.m. Can See In The Sky - Part 2”. 8 Dark-Sky weekend. Sunset 5:07 At the recent American Astronomical 26 Houge Park star party. Sunset p.m, 21% moon sets 9:38 p.m. Society meeting in Pasadena on October 6, 2010, a presentation was made by 4:52 p.m., 68% moon rises 10:04 Henry Coe Park’s “Astronomy” lot has Dr. Franck Marchis (SETI Institute, UC- p.m. Star party hours: 7:00 until been reserved. Berkeley) on “Characteristics of Known 14 Houge Park star party. Sunset 5:13 10:00. Triple Asteroids in the Main Belt”. One p.m, 75% moon sets 3:28 a.m. Star 27 Dark Sky weekend. Sunset 4:51 point made during Dr. Marchis’ AAS talk p.m., 57% moon rises 11:13 p.m. party hours: 7:00 until 10:00 p.m. was that the visual observations made by 15 General Meeting. Our speaker Gerry Rattley and Bill Cooke during the December is TBD. Board meeting at 6:30; October 10, 1980 stellar occultation by 4 Dark Sky weekend. Sunset 4:50 General Meeting at 8:00 (216) Kleopatra (near Loma Prieta, CA; p.m., no moon. Henry Coe 28 Astronomy Class at Houge Park. reported to IOTA), were now deemed Park’s “Astronomy” lot has been 7:00 p.m. The topic: TBA. not only plausible, but very probable. The reserved. 28 Houge Park star party. Sunset 5:22 results for (216) Kleopatra were included 10 Astronomy Class at Houge Park. p.m, 23% moon rises 3:53 a.m. Star with further results for five other asteroids 7:30 p.m. Topic is TBD. party hours: 7:00 until 10:00 p.m. that show duplicity and/or satellites. 10 Houge Park star party. Sunset 29 Dark-Sky weekend. Sunset 5:29 4:50 p.m., 29% moon sets 9:56 p.m, 15% moon rises 4:46 a.m. (216) Kleopatra is a relatively large asteroid, measuring 217 × 94 × 81 km. It is believed p.m. Star party hours: 7:00 until to be a loosely packed metallic object, 10:00. based on its radar albedo. Kleopatra is 18 General Meeting at 8 p.m. Our 217 km (135 miles) long, give or take The Board of Directors meets speaker is Dr. Tim Dubbs, speak- 25% — about the size of the state of New before each general meeting at ing on Particle Physics and on Jersey. The irregular, bi-lobate (“dumbbell’) 6:30 p.m. All are welcome to his work on the LHC’s particle elongated shape has been strongly attend. confirmed by teams of IOTA occultation observers on several occasions (1980, 1991, 24 hour news and information hotline: 2008, and 2009). (408) 559-1221 http://www.sjaa.net Continued on page 2 Copyright © 2010 San Jose Astronomical Association, Inc. Volume 21 Number 12 Official publication of the San Jose Astronomical Association, December 2010 1980 occultation observation of a satel- lite of asteroid (216) by the professionals — For many edu/~fmarchis/Science/Asteroids/ Continued from page 1 years, the thought of the existence of Triple/DPS2010/DPS2010_Marchis.pdf satellites of asteroids was held to be And an abstract for their forthcoming In 2008, Marchis’ team imaged (216) implausible, if not impossible — just paper, submitted for publication in Kleopatra with the Keck II telescope as the concept of irregular shapes for the professional journal ICARUS, adaptive optics, definitely showing the the asteroids was also held in contempt is here:http://adsabs.harvard.edu/ irregular “peanut” shape of the asteroid, by many theoreticians previously. Of abs/2010DPS....42.4605M along with two nearby satellites. Other course, direct images from spacecraft researchers have previously imaged have confirmed what was previously Kleopatra with the large radar dishes at suggested by many ground-based Goldstone and Arecibo, producing a 3-D occultation observations. (This is also Gerry Rattley served as an SJAA officer map of its shape and orientation. Now, true for several of the comet nuclei and Board Member during the 1980s, Marchis and his team have plotted the which have been imaged, including and was a recipient of the A.B Gregory orbits for two satellites of the asteroid, recent radar results for Comet 103P Award in 1982. He has continued to which strongly confirms likelihood of Hartley.) be an active occultation observer the visual occultation observations of a and member of the International satellite by Rattley and Cooke, made in The details of the story are explained Occultation Timing Association (IOTA). October, 1980. in an article published on the internet Since moving to Gilbert, Arizona in by Kelly Beatty, a columnist for Sky July, 1982, Gerry has been active in the This marks a distinct turning point — and Telescope magazine, who was Saguaro Astronomy Club and more for now, 30 years later, professionals in the audience at the October AAS recently, the East Valley Astronomy have at last recognized the value of meeting in Pasadena: http://www. Club. Presently he is an active volunteer such occultation observations by skyandtelescope.com/news/104690129. telescope operator at the Gilbert Rotary amateurs. For since that time, those html. The complete PPT presentation Centennial Observatory (GRCO) in observations have been either largely by Dr. Marchis and his team may be Gilbert, AZ. ignored, or denigrated completely downloaded here: http://astro.berkeley. The Shallow Sky Full of Moon Akkana Peck Although there are plenty of planets usual, the moon is offset within the Prior to LOLA, the highest point on the to watch in December — Jupiter high Earth's shadow; the north limb of the moon was thought to be Beta in the in the sky, Uranus and Neptune visible moon will be brighter than the south Leibnitz Range, at 36,000 feet. That one in the early evening, Mercury low in during totality. you *can* see, at least in months when the evening during the first half of the there's a good western libration so Mare month, and Venus and Saturn in the It's been a while since we've had an Orientale is tilted toward us. December morning — the real news this month is eclipse this good! But the eclipse isn't the isn't ideal but it isn't bad. On the 20th all about the moon. only moon news. Our satellite has been while you're waiting for the eclipse to in the science press quite a bit over the start, swing over to the southwestern We'll see (weather permitting) a past month. limb of the moon, get out your Rukl and spectacular lunar eclipse on the evening turn to chart 61 and libration chart VII. of Monday December 20th, perfectly For instance, the Lunar Orbiter Laser Rukl doesn't label the Leibnitzes, but placed with the moon way up at 75 Altimeter (LOLA) team just announced they're near Valles Bouvard, just outside degrees. The moon will be just above that they'd found the highest point the southern edge of the Cordillera the raised arm of Orion, as though the on the moon. Unfortunately, you mountains. full moon were a tennis ball Orion is can't see it: it's on the lunar far side, a about to lob right through the Hyades. visually undistinguished gentle rise near Okay, so the Engel'gardt area isn't the Engel'gardt on the fringe of the Korolev most impressive lofty peak you've seen. The penumbral eclipse begins at 9:29pm plain. It's 10,786 meters (35,387 feet) But there was other moon news last PST. This stage is very subtle and you above the lunar datum — an arbitrary month. probably won't see any difference, but it point chosen to act as "sea level" on the doesn't hurt to try! Partial eclipse begins moon. For comparison, Everest is 8,848 "Water on the moon!" screamed the at 10:32, with totality lasting from 11:40 meters above Earth's sea level. headlines. The results came from several p.m. until 12:53 Tuesday morning. As new papers analyzing the results of the SJAA EPHEMERIS Page 2 December 2010 LCROSS impact. Remember LCROSS? the big bare spot in the mountainside month, so you'd need somewhere It crashed into Cabeus crater near the that you can't help but notice when you around 65 tons of rock, 650 cubic feet moon's south pole in October 2009, and fly out of San Jose? 12 gallons doesn't or about 24 cubic yards, or a cube about we were all disappointed that it didn't sound like very much compared to the 8.6 feet on a side. produce a big visual plume. But it did needs of a working lunar base. produce lots of spectral data, which has Okay, that isn't that big a slag pile after finally been processed and published — But how much rock is a ton of rock? all.
Recommended publications
  • (704) Interamnia from Its Occultations and Lightcurves
    International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014, 4, 91-118 Published Online March 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijaa http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2014.41010 A 3-D Shape Model of (704) Interamnia from Its Occultations and Lightcurves Isao Satō1*, Marc Buie2, Paul D. Maley3, Hiromi Hamanowa4, Akira Tsuchikawa5, David W. Dunham6 1Astronomical Society of Japan, Yamagata, Japan 2Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, USA 3International Occultation Timing Association, Houston, USA 4Hamanowa Astronomical Observatory, Fukushima, Japan 5Yanagida Astronomical Observatory, Ishikawa, Japan 6International Occultation Timing Association, Greenbelt, USA Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 9 November 2013; revised 9 December 2013; accepted 17 December 2013 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract A 3-D shape model of the sixth largest of the main belt asteroids, (704) Interamnia, is presented. The model is reproduced from its two stellar occultation observations and six lightcurves between 1969 and 2011. The first stellar occultation was the occultation of TYC 234500183 on 1996 De- cember 17 observed from 13 sites in the USA. An elliptical cross section of (344.6 ± 9.6 km) × (306.2 ± 9.1 km), for position angle P = 73.4 ± 12.5˚ was fitted. The lightcurve around the occulta- tion shows that the peak-to-peak amplitude was 0.04 mag. and the occultation phase was just be- fore the minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM in the 1960S, the United States Was Not the Only Country That Was Trying to Land Someone on the Moon and Bring Him Back to Earth Safely
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM In the 1960s, the United States was not the only country that was trying to land someone on the Moon and bring him back to Earth safely. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, also called the Soviet Union, also had a manned lunar program. This lesson describes some of it. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. Have you ever been busy doing something when somebody challenges you to a race? If you decide to join the race—and it is usually up to you whether you join or not—you have to stop what you’re doing, get up, and start racing. By the time you’ve gotten started, the other person is often halfway to the goal. This is the sort of situation the Soviet Union found itself in when President Kennedy in 1961 announced that the United States would set a goal of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth before the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Water on the Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity
    Water on The Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity Arlin Crotts (Columbia University) For centuries some scientists have argued that there is activity on the Moon (or water, as recounted in Parts I & II), while others have thought the Moon is simply a dead, inactive world. [1] The question comes in several forms: is there a detectable atmosphere? Does the surface of the Moon change? What causes interior seismic activity? From a more modern viewpoint, we now know that as much carbon monoxide as water was excavated during the LCROSS impact, as detailed in Part I, and a comparable amount of other volatiles were found. At one time the Moon outgassed prodigious amounts of water and hydrogen in volcanic fire fountains, but released similar amounts of volatile sulfur (or SO2), and presumably large amounts of carbon dioxide or monoxide, if theory is to be believed. So water on the Moon is associated with other gases. Astronomers have agreed for centuries that there is no firm evidence for “weather” on the Moon visible from Earth, and little evidence of thick atmosphere. [2] How would one detect the Moon’s atmosphere from Earth? An obvious means is atmospheric refraction. As you watch the Sun set, its image is displaced by Earth’s atmospheric refraction at the horizon from the position it would have if there were no atmosphere, by roughly 0.6 degree (a bit more than the Sun’s angular diameter). On the Moon, any atmosphere would cause an analogous effect for a star passing behind the Moon during an occultation (multiplied by two since the light travels both into and out of the lunar atmosphere).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of the GENUINE CHRISTIAN IMAGE
    In Pursuit of THE GENUINE CHRISTIAN IMAGE Erland Forsberg as a Lutheran Producer of Icons in the Fields of Culture and Religion Juha Malmisalo Academic dissertation To be publicly discussed, by permission of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium XII in the Main Building of the University, on May 14, 2005, at 10 am. Helsinki 2005 1 In Pursuit of THE GENUINE CHRISTIAN IMAGE Erland Forsberg as a Lutheran Producer of Icons in the Fields of Culture and Religion Juha Malmisalo Helsinki 2005 2 ISBN 952-91-8539-1 (nid.) ISBN 952-10-2414-3 (PDF) University Printing House Helsinki 2005 3 Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ................................................................................................................... 6 Preface ..................................................................................................................... 7 1. Encountering Peripheral Cultural Phenomena ......................................... 9 1.1. Forsberg’s Icon Painting in Art Sociological Analysis: Conceptual Issues and Selected Perspectives ............................................................ 9 1.2. An Adaptation of Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Fields .......................... 18 1.3. The Pictorial Source Material: Questions of Accessibility and Method .. 23 2. Attempts at a Field-Constitution ................................................................ 30 2.1. Educational, Social, and
    [Show full text]
  • New Double Stars from Asteroidal Occultations, 1971 - 2008
    Vol. 6 No. 1 January 1, 2010 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 88 New Double Stars from Asteroidal Occultations, 1971 - 2008 Dave Herald, Canberra, Australia International Occultation Timing Association (IOTA) Robert Boyle, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA Dickinson College David Dunham, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA; Toshio Hirose, Tokyo, Japan; Paul Maley, Houston, Texas, USA; Bradley Timerson, Newark, New York, USA International Occultation Timing Association (IOTA) Tim Farris, Gallatin, Tennessee, USA Volunteer State Community College Eric Frappa and Jean Lecacheux, Paris, France Observatoire de Paris Tsutomu Hayamizu, Kagoshima, Japan Sendai Space Hall Marek Kozubal, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA Clay Center Richard Nolthenius, Aptos, California, USA Cabrillo College and IOTA Lewis C. Roberts, Jr., Pasadena, California, USA California Institute of Technology/Jet Propulsion Laboratory David Tholen, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA University of Hawaii E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Observations of occultations by asteroids and planetary moons can detect double stars with separations in the range of about 0.3” to 0.001”. This paper lists all double stars detected in asteroidal occultations up to the end of 2008. It also provides a general explanation of the observational method and analysis. The incidence of double stars with a separation in the range 0.001” to 0.1” with a magnitude difference less than 2 is estimated to be about 1%. Vol. 6 No. 1 January 1, 2010 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 89 New Double Stars from Asteroidal Occultations, 1971 - 2008 tions. More detail about the method of analysis is set Introduction out in the Appendix. Asteroids and planetary moons will naturally oc- cult many stars as they move through the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL-Identified Gravity Anomalies in Oceanus Procellarum: Insight Into 2 Subsurface Impact and Magmatic Structures on the Moon 3 4 Ariel N
    1 GRAIL-identified gravity anomalies in Oceanus Procellarum: Insight into 2 subsurface impact and magmatic structures on the Moon 3 4 Ariel N. Deutscha, Gregory A. Neumannb, James W. Heada, Lionel Wilsona,c 5 6 aDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 7 02912, USA 8 bNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 9 cLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 10 11 Corresponding author: Ariel N. Deutsch 12 Corresponding email: [email protected] 13 14 Date of re-submission: 5 April 2019 15 16 Re-submitted to: Icarus 17 Manuscript number: ICARUS_2018_549 18 19 Highlights: 20 • Four positive Bouguer gravity anomalies are analyzed on the Moon’s nearside. 21 • The amplitudes of the anomalies require a deep density contrast. 22 • One 190-km anomaly with crater-related topography is suggestive of mantle uplift. 23 • Marius Hills anomalies are consistent with intruded dike swarms. 24 • An anomaly south of Aristarchus has a crater rim and possibly magmatic intrusions. 25 26 Key words: 27 Moon; gravity; impact cratering; volcanism 1 28 Abstract 29 30 Four, quasi-circular, positive Bouguer gravity anomalies (PBGAs) that are similar in diameter 31 (~90–190 km) and gravitational amplitude (>140 mGal contrast) are identified within the central 32 Oceanus Procellarum region of the Moon. These spatially associated PBGAs are located south of 33 Aristarchus Plateau, north of Flamsteed crater, and two are within the Marius Hills volcanic 34 complex (north and south). Each is characterized by distinct surface geologic features suggestive 35 of ancient impact craters and/or volcanic/plutonic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Mapping of the Structural Deformation of Large Impact Craters on the Moon and Mercury
    MODELING AND MAPPING OF THE STRUCTURAL DEFORMATION OF LARGE IMPACT CRATERS ON THE MOON AND MERCURY by JEFFREY A. BALCERSKI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2015 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Jeffrey A. Balcerski candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Committee Chair Steven A. Hauck, II James A. Van Orman Ralph P. Harvey Xiong Yu June 1, 2015 *we also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein ~ i ~ Dedicated to Marie, for her love, strength, and faith ~ ii ~ Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1 2. Tilted Crater Floors as Records of Mercury’s Surface Deformation .....................4 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................5 2.2 Craters and Global Tilt Meters ................................................................8 2.3 Measurement Process...............................................................................12 2.3.1 Visual Pre-selection of Candidate Craters ................................13 2.3.2 Inspection and Inclusion/Exclusion of Altimetric Profiles .......14 2.3.3 Trend Fitting of Crater Floor Topography ................................16 2.4 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Impact Basins Revealed by Gravity Recovery and Interior
    Lunar impact basins revealed by Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory measurements Gregory Neumann, Maria Zuber, Mark Wieczorek, James Head, David Baker, Sean Solomon, David Smith, Frank Lemoine, Erwan Mazarico, Terence Sabaka, et al. To cite this version: Gregory Neumann, Maria Zuber, Mark Wieczorek, James Head, David Baker, et al.. Lunar im- pact basins revealed by Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory measurements. Science Advances , American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2015, 1 (9), pp.e1500852. 10.1126/sci- adv.1500852. hal-02458613 HAL Id: hal-02458613 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02458613 Submitted on 26 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ARTICLE PLANETARY SCIENCE 2015 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed Lunar impact basins revealed by Gravity under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). Recovery and Interior Laboratory measurements 10.1126/sciadv.1500852 Gregory A. Neumann,1* Maria T. Zuber,2 Mark A. Wieczorek,3 James W. Head,4 David M. H. Baker,4 Sean C. Solomon,5,6 David E. Smith,2 Frank G.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Gravity Observations of the Transition from Complex Crater to Peak-Ring Basin on the Moon: Implications for Crustal Structure and Impact Basin Formation
    Icarus 292 (2017) 54–73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus GRAIL gravity observations of the transition from complex crater to peak-ring basin on the Moon: Implications for crustal structure and impact basin formation ∗ David M.H. Baker a,b, , James W. Head a, Roger J. Phillips c, Gregory A. Neumann b, Carver J. Bierson d, David E. Smith e, Maria T. Zuber e a Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA b NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA c Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA d Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA e Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: High-resolution gravity data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission provide Received 14 September 2016 the opportunity to analyze the detailed gravity and crustal structure of impact features in the morpho- Revised 1 March 2017 logical transition from complex craters to peak-ring basins on the Moon. We calculate average radial Accepted 21 March 2017 profiles of free-air anomalies and Bouguer anomalies for peak-ring basins, protobasins, and the largest Available online 22 March 2017 complex craters. Complex craters and protobasins have free-air anomalies that are positively correlated with surface topography, unlike the prominent lunar mascons (positive free-air anomalies in areas of low elevation) associated with large basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0706.3947V1
    Transient Lunar Phenomena: Regularity and Reality Arlin P.S. Crotts Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 ABSTRACT Transient lunar phenomena (TLPs) have been reported for centuries, but their nature is largely unsettled, and even their existence as a coherent phenomenon is still controversial. Nonetheless, a review of TLP data shows regularities in the observations; a key question is whether this structure is imposed by human observer effects, terrestrial atmospheric effects or processes tied to the lunar surface. I interrogate an extensive catalog of TLPs to determine if human factors play a determining role in setting the distribution of TLP reports. We divide the sample according to variables which should produce varying results if the determining factors involve humans e.g., historical epoch or geographical location of the observer, and not reflecting phenomena tied to the lunar surface. Specifically, we bin the reports into selenographic areas (300 km on a side), then construct a robust average count for such “pixels” in a way discarding discrepant counts. Regardless of how we split the sample, the results are very similar: roughly 50% of the report count originate from the crater Aristarchus and vicinity, 16% from Plato, 6% from recent, major impacts (Copernicus, ∼ ∼ Kepler and Tycho - beyond Aristarchus), plus a few at Grimaldi. Mare Crisium produces a robust signal for three of five averages of up to 7% of the reports (however, Crisium subtends more than one pixel). The consistency in TLP report counts for specific features on this list indicate that 80% of the reports arXiv:0706.3947v1 [astro-ph] 27 Jun 2007 ∼ are consistent with being real (perhaps with the exception of Crisium).
    [Show full text]
  • (GRAIL) Mission Maria T. Zuber1*, David E. Smith1, M
    Gravity Field of the Moon from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission Maria T. Zuber1*, David E. Smith1, Michael M. Watkins2, Sami W. Asmar2, Alexander S. Konopliv2, Frank G. Lemoine3, H. Jay Melosh4, Gregory A. Neumann3, Roger J. Phillips5, Sean C. Solomon6,7, Mark A. Wieczorek8, James G. Williams2, Sander J. Goossens9, Gerhard Kruizinga2, Erwan Mazarico1, Ryan S. Park2 and Dah-Ning Yuan2 Submitted to: Science 12 October 2012 Spacecraft-to-spacecraft tracking observations from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) have been used to construct a gravitational field of the Moon to spherical harmonic degree and order 420. The GRAIL field reveals features not previously resolved, including tectonic structures, volcanic landforms, basin rings, crater central peaks, and numerous simple craters. From degrees 80 through 300, over 98% of the gravitational signature is associated with topography, which reflects the preservation of craters in highly fractured crust. The remaining 2% represents fine details of subsurface structure not previously resolved. Ghost craters in the maria are not abundant, consistent with underlying highland crust being significantly modified by dikes and intrusions. GRAIL elucidates the role of impact bombardment in homogenizing the distribution of shallow density anomalies on terrestrial planetary bodies. _____________ The Moon is a key to deciphering the evolutionary history of the terrestrial planets because it is the most accessible planetary body that preserves a surface record spanning most of solar system history. Reconstructing planetary evolution requires an understanding of the structure of the interior, which contains information on bulk composition, differentiation, and the nature of heat generation and heat loss that has influenced the style, extent, and duration of volcanism and tectonics.
    [Show full text]