DOCSLIB.ORG

100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the Future Foresight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Foresight 100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the future EN 100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the future European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A.2 — Research & Innovation Strategy Contact Nikolaos Kastrinos E-mail [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Manuscript completed in May 2019 – re-edition November 2019 This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use, which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-13045-1 doi: 10.2777/563770 KI-01-19-886-EN-N © European Union, 2019. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover page image: © Lonely # 46246900, ag visuell #16440826, Sean Gladwell #6018533, LwRedStorm #3348265, 2011; kras99 #43746830, 2012. Source: Fotolia.com. EUROPEAN COMMISSION 100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the future The Radical Innovation Breakthrough Inquirer Authors Philine Warnke, Kerstin Cuhls, Ulrich Schmoch, Lea Daniel Fraunhofer ISI Liviu Andreescu, Bianca Dragomir, Radu Gheorghiu, Catalina Baboschi, Adrian Curaj Institutul de Prospectivă Marjukka Parkkinen, Osmo Kuusi University of Turku 2019 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation EN Acknowledgements Our special thanks go to the foresight team of DG RTD, Nikolaos Kastrinos and Nathalie Vercruysse. They organized the workshops in Brussels, contributed to reports and workshop agendas, and supported the project with a lot of patience until the very end. The following collaborators have greatly contributed to the drafting of technological briefs that are presented in this report: Enache Vlad, Ungureanu Irina, Burinaru Tiberiu, Ilian Virgil, Vieru Vlad, Brabete Valentin, Cojocaru Ovidiu, Chihaia Viorel, Chiriac Alexandru, Tudorie George, Mitarca Monica, Popa Octavian, Ungureanu Viorel, Cosmescu Codruta, Matei Lilia, Sima Maria. We express our sincere appreciation to the distinguished panel of interviewees who shared their expertise and time to discuss Global Value Networks in fall 2017: André Alvarim, Anzori Barkalaja, Martin Bristol, Jennifer Cassingena Harper, Zoya Damianova, Tea Danilov, Martin Fatun, Patrick Garda, Anne Guichard, Eric Hauet, Jozef Herčko, Lars Klüver, Sofi Kurki, Ira Van Keulen, Emmanuel Koukios, Alois Krtil, Jan Lesinsky, Tõnis Mets, Katrien Mondt, László Monostori, Michael Nentwich, Juan Carlos Parajó, Melanie Peters, Roberto Poli, Robert Redhammer, Ramojus Reimeris, Mari Rell, Anna Sacio-Szymańska, Róbert Šimončič, Peter De Smedt, Peter Stanovnik, Amos Taylor, Arnold Ubelis, Anders Vestergaard Jensen and Karl Westberg. In addition, we express our gratitude to Jurgita Petrauskienė and Eugenijus Butkus for a discussion on the topic. A special “thank you” is given to the PhD Panel that filled in the survey on Global Value Networks and Radical Innovation Breakthroughs in spring 2018 under severe time pressure: Ernest Aigner, Divya Balakrishnan, Robert Emprechtinger, Laura Hille, Jan Janošec, Anton Jansson, Nikolaos Korakas, Ilya Kuzovkin, Daniel Alsina Leal, Ashish Rauniyar, Adrian Sima, Jaroslaw Skowronski, Amos Taylor, Fabiana Troisi, Irina Ungureanu, Marjolein van der Waal. We are very thankful for the active contributions of the participants in our workshops in Brussels. The speakers of our workshop on Global Value Networks were Barbara Haering, E-Concept AG, Ezio Andreta, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Adrian Curaj, Institul de Prospectiva, Michael Keenan, OECD, Osmo Kuusi, Finland Futures, Andrea Renda, Center for European Policy Studies, Keith Smith, Imperial College London, and the Member of the Committee of the Future of the Parliament of Finland Ville Vähämäki. Active groupwork participants were: Michele Acciaro, Kühne Logistics University, Amanda Allertop Sorensen, Copenhagen EU Office, Antonio Alvarenga, ALVA RC, Carlos Alvarez-Pereira, Innaxis Foundation & Research Institute, Maria Boile, Hellenic Institute for transport, Michael Carus, Nova-Institute for Ecology & Innovation, Tea Danilov, Foresight Center, Dianne Dredge, Aalborg University, Charles Featherstone, Government Office for Science, Siliva Ganzerla, EUROCITIES, Kenisha Garnett, Cranfield University, Christian Grunwald, Z-Punkt Foresight Company, Olli Hietanen, University of Turku, Pierfrancesco Moretti, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Augusta Maria Paci, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche,Aape Pohjavirta, Funzi, Ramojus Reimeris, Research & Higher Education Monitoring and Analysis, Sybille Vandenhove, Bridging for Sustainability SPRL, Barend Van der Meulen, Rathenau Institute, Bosjan Vasle, Governmental Institute of Macroeconomics Analysis, Catherine 2 Whitelegg, German Federal Ministry for Education and Research, Alfred Wuëst, EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic S & T as our external guests; and from EU institutions Thomas Arnold, DG RTD, Olivier Chassagne, DG GROW, Nuno Eca Guimaraes, DG JUST, Elisabeta Florescu, JRC, Artur Furtado, DG SANTE, Laszlo Helmle, DG RTD, Ilona Lelonek Husting, DG GROW, Cristina Marolda, DG MOVE, Elena Montani, DG ENV, Eamonn Noonan, Europan Parliament Research Service, Daniele Rechard, Europan Parliament Research Service, David Rios Morentin, DG HOME, Frank Smit, DG RTD, Vincent Viaud, European, Environment Agency. During the final RIBRI workshop, we discussed vividly with Thomas Arnold (RTD), Laure Baillargeon (GROW), Florence Buchholze (AGRI), Olivier Chassagne (GROW), Fabrizio Colimberti (RTD), Phebe Dudek (RTD), Elizabeth Florescu (JRC), Jessica Giraldi (JRC), Georgios Kastrinos (RTD), Katerina Kokesova (RTD), Raphaela Kotsch (RTD), Carla Santos, Harald Stieber (JUST), Eckhard Stormer (JRC), Szekacs Szabolcs (GROW), Luigi Vitiello (GROW) and Jyri Ylkanen (GROW). Thank you for the additional input! 3 FOREWORD Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe are ambitious EU research and innovation programmes aiming at strengthening science, technology and innovation, fostering European industrial competiveness, and helping to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. These ambitions will require a step-change in breakthrough innovation in Europe. The proposal for the European Innovation Council is at the heart of our ambitions for breakthrough innovations. But it is not alone. Breakthrough innovations are needed to boost the quality of our science as well as to address the many challenges faced by people today, individually as well as collectively. Our Horizon Scanning for Radical Innovation Breakthroughs is part of the preparation for Horizon Europe’s implementation. A massive automated survey of recent scientific and technical literature filtered through panels of experts has been combined with reviews of important recent foresight projects worldwide. The results have been screened for their potential impact on future global value creation, and assessed in terms of current maturity, long-term diffusion potential and relative strength of the EU in research and innovation. This report “100 radical innovation breakthroughs for the future” captures the most potentially impactful results. It provides a strategic resource to all those concerned with decisions on science, technology and innovation. For example, in EU research and innovation policy planning we need to understand the potential of breakthroughs as enablers or barriers to sustainability transitions. Such transitions involve interactions and potential synergies between different policies of the Union. The collection of radical innovation breakthroughs can create common references between different policies and facilitate interactions. With the publication of this report, we hope to also contribute to national and regional strategies, be they on research and innovation priorities or on smart specialization. To improve the lives of people, our reflection about the future should be inspired by the goals of sustainability in order to stretch the boundaries of what is feasible in function of what is desirable for people. Radical innovation breakthroughs are aspirational and inspirational. Scanning the horizon to identify them is a growing part of policy intelligence. Jean-Eric PAQUET Director General for Research and Innovation European Commission 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 10 1 Introduction 18 2 Overview methodology 19 3 How to read the report 20 4 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs (RIBs) in technology 21 4.1 Group 1. Artificial Intelligence and Robots 27 4.2 Group 2. Human-Machine Interaction & Biomimetics 79 4.3 Group 3. Electronics & Computing 97 4.4 Group 4. Biohybrids 125 4.5 Group 5. Biomedicine 141 4.6 Group 6. Printing & Materials 173 4.7 Group 7. Breaking Ressource Boundaries 198 4.8 Group 8. Energy 222
Recommended publications
  • Looking for Podcast Suggestions? We’Ve Got You Covered

    Looking for Podcast Suggestions? We’Ve Got You Covered

    Looking for podcast suggestions? We’ve got you covered. We asked Loomis faculty members to share their podcast playlists with us, and they offered a variety of suggestions as wide-ranging as their areas of personal interest and professional expertise. Here’s a collection of 85 of these free, downloadable audio shows for you to try, listed alphabetically with their “recommenders” listed below each entry: 30 for 30 You may be familiar with ESPN’s 30 for 30 series of award-winning sports documentaries on television. The podcasts of the same name are audio documentaries on similarly compelling subjects. Recent podcasts have looked at the man behind the Bikram Yoga fitness craze, racial activism by professional athletes, the origins of the hugely profitable Ultimate Fighting Championship, and the lasting legacy of the John Madden Football video game. Recommended by Elliott: “I love how it involves the culture of sports. You get an inner look on a sports story or event that you never really knew about. Brings real life and sports together in a fantastic way.” 99% Invisible From the podcast website: “Ever wonder how inflatable men came to be regular fixtures at used car lots? Curious about the origin of the fortune cookie? Want to know why Sigmund Freud opted for a couch over an armchair? 99% Invisible is about all the thought that goes into the things we don’t think about — the unnoticed architecture and design that shape our world.” Recommended by Scott ABCA Calls from the Clubhouse Interviews with coaches in the American Baseball Coaches Association Recommended by Donnie, who is head coach of varsity baseball and says the podcast covers “all aspects of baseball, culture, techniques, practices, strategy, etc.
  • Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges

    Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges

    DANIEL NETTLE Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges Essays on Science, Society and the Academic Life D ANIEL Essays on Science, Society I love this book. I love the essays and I love the overall form. Reading these essays feels like entering into the best kind of intellectual conversati on—it makes me want and the Academic Life to write essays in reply. It makes me want to get everyone else reading it. I almost N never feel this enthusiasti c about a book. ETTLE —Rebecca Saxe, Professor of Cogniti ve Science at MIT What does it mean to be a scien� st working today; specifi cally, a scien� st whose subject ma� er is human life? Scien� sts o� en overstate their claim to certainty, sor� ng the world into categorical dis� nc� ons that obstruct rather than clarify its complexi� es. In this book Daniel Ne� le urges the reader to unpick such DANIEL NETTLE dis� nc� ons—biological versus social sciences, mind versus body, and nature versus nurture—and look instead for the for puzzles and anomalies, the points of Hanging on to the Edges connec� on and overlap. These essays, converted from o� en humorous, some� mes autobiographical blog posts, form an extended medita� on on the possibili� es and frustra� ons of the life scien� fi c. Pragma� cally arguing from the intersec� on between social and biological sciences, Ne� le reappraises the virtues of policy ini� a� ves such as Universal Basic Income and income redistribu� on, highligh� ng the traps researchers and poli� cians are liable to encounter.
  • Njit-Etd2010-076

    Njit-Etd2010-076

    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT AUTOMATION OF ANATOMIC TORSION MONITOR FOR EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF LOW BACK DYSFUNCTION by Vishal Kumar Singh The existing Anatomical Torsion Monitor (ATM) to evaluate mechanical stiffness and viscoelasticity of the low back suffers from various inherent defects. This has to be replaced by an improved device. Also the existing ATM cannot provide oscillations to the low back.
  • Harnessing the Innovation Opportunities of Novel Technologies and Technological Change

    Harnessing the Innovation Opportunities of Novel Technologies and Technological Change

    Business Research Methodologies and the need for Economies of Scale in the Business Research Process: Harnessing the Innovation Opportunities of Novel Technologies and Technological Change Chris William Callaghan University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] DOI: 10.34190/JBRM.17.3.007 Abstract: Theory and evidence suggests that returns to research and research and development are currently declining. This paper seeks to identify patterns in the use of business research methodologies in certain of the latest articles published at the forefront of the field of business research innovation, from its leading journal. This literature is used to identify the current front line of business research methodologies at the forefront of the field. Propositions are derived from novel theory, and are critically juxtaposed against identified topics and methodologies in these articles. In so doing, the conceptual distance of the front line of empirical research in the field from the radical front line of theory in the broader field is quantified. Methodological implications are discussed and recommendations are made for the development of a future research agenda. Keywords: Research methodology; Innovation; Technology; Technological change; Management; Crowdsourcing 1. Introduction Global growth in volumes of goods and services- produced using a given amount of labour and capital- has over time fundamentally determined growth in human living standards (Fabina and Wright, 2013). For example, the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) has risen over 20-fold since 1850, globally transforming standards of living (Stewart, 2018). This rise in our standards of living has therefore been ascribed to technical progress, measured as total factor productivity- the contribution to growth of how effectively we combine given amounts of labour and capital.
  • Projected Roles for Disruptive and Emergent Technologies

    Projected Roles for Disruptive and Emergent Technologies

    50 Technology as a Driver of Future Change in the Forest Sector Technology as a Driver of Future Change in the Forest Sector: Projected Roles for Disruptive and Emergent Technologies George H. Kubik Abstract: This paper examines emergent and disruptive technologies as potential drivers of change in forest sector futures. Two questions are addressed: (1) Which emergent and disruptive technologies can be projected to substantively impact forestry futures? (2) What are the possible implications of emergent and disruptive technologies for decision makers, policymakers, and other stakeholders involved in forest sector futures? A 20-year timeframe is used for this explorative paper. A cross-disciplinary review of futures literature was implemented to identify and investigate leading emergent and disruptive technologies. A list of candidate technologies was developed from the literature review and eight technologies were selected: artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, electronic performance enhancement systems, genomics and synthetic biology, the Internet of Things, materials science, nanotechnology, and robotics. Each of the eight technologies was then defined and three representative forecasts were projected for each technology. The goal is to provide decision makers, policymakers, and other stakeholders in the forest sector with an awareness of emergent and potentially disruptive technologies and how they might disrupt forest sector futures. The purpose of this paper is not to predict the future in detail, but to (1) promote awareness and informed thinking about the relationship between potentially disruptive technologies and forest sector futures and (2) stimulate a research agenda based on the study of these projected futures. KEY WORDS: emergent technology, disruptive technology, artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, electronic performance enhancement systems, genomics and synthetic biology, Internet of Things, materials science, nanotechnology and robotics Citation: Kubik, George H.
  • Reducing Stress Via Three Different Group Counseling Styles

    Reducing Stress Via Three Different Group Counseling Styles

    The Journal for Specialists in Group Work ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/usgw20 The Critical Cycle of Mixtape Creation: Reducing Stress via Three Different Group Counseling Styles Ian Levy & Raphael Travis To cite this article: Ian Levy & Raphael Travis (2020) The Critical Cycle of Mixtape Creation: Reducing Stress via Three Different Group Counseling Styles, The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 45:4, 307-330, DOI: 10.1080/01933922.2020.1826614 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2020.1826614 Published online: 15 Oct 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 76 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=usgw20 THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2020, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 307–330 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2020.1826614 RESEARCH The Critical Cycle of Mixtape Creation: Reducing Stress via Three Different Group Counseling Styles Ian Levya and Raphael Travisb aManhattan College; bTexas State University ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY While significant attention has been given to student learning loss Received October 09, 2019 across summer, much less attention is given to student stressors and Accepted September 09, 2020 mental health concerns. To assist youth in processing and coping with KEYWORDS emotional stress, research explores approaches to group counseling Hip Hop; school counseling; wherein youth write, record, and perform emotionally themed hip hop social work; multicultural mixtapes. Hip hop, counseling, and social work literature lack studies counseling; group work comparing the effectiveness of different group types.
  • Alphabet's 2019 CDP Climate Change Report

    Alphabet's 2019 CDP Climate Change Report

    Alphabet, Inc. - Climate Change 2019 C0. Introduction C0.1 (C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization. As our founders Larry and Sergey wrote in the original founders' letter, "Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one." That unconventional spirit has been a driving force throughout our history -- inspiring us to do things like rethink the mobile device ecosystem with Android and map the world with Google Maps. As part of that, our founders also explained that you could expect us to make "smaller bets in areas that might seem very speculative or even strange when compared to our current businesses." From the start, the company has always strived to do more, and to do important and meaningful things with the resources we have. Alphabet is a collection of businesses -- the largest of which is Google. It also includes businesses that are generally pretty far afield of our main internet products in areas such as self-driving cars, life sciences, internet access and TV services. We report all non- Google businesses collectively as Other Bets. Our Alphabet structure is about helping each of our businesses prosper through strong leaders and independence. We have always been a company committed to building products that have the potential to improve the lives of millions of people. Our product innovations have made our services widely used, and our brand one of the most recognized in the world. Google's core products and platforms such as Android, Chrome, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Maps, Google Play, Search, and YouTube each have over one billion monthly active users.
  • Television Academy Awards

    Television Academy Awards

    2019 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Directing For A Documentary/Nonfiction Program Adam Ruins Everything Adam Ruins Guns November 27, 2018 Adam Conover takes aim at both sides of the gun debate by explaining why an assault weapons ban would be ineffective at stopping gun violence, outlining how the Second Amendment has been twisted to benefit the NRA, and revealing that liberal and conservative gun policies have impacted people of color. Tim Wilkime, Directed by America To Me Listen To The Poem! September 30, 2018 Spring semester brings fresh challenges. Jada clashes with junior Diane over her new film. Brendan recalls a racially charged basketball past. Tiara and the cheerleading squad go for the gold. Charles’ poetry slam team faces an epic challenge. Steve James, Directed by American Dream/American Knightmare December 21, 2018 Documentary that delves into the life and exploits of the iconic Death Row Records co-founder Suge Knight, and the era in gangsta rap he presided over. Through a series of face-to-face interviewers, Knight reveals exactly how it all happened and why it all fell apart. Antoine Fuqua, Directed by American Experience: The Circus October 08, 2018 - October 09, 2018 American Experience: The Circus explores the colorful history of this popular, influential and distinctly American form of entertainment, from the first one-ring show at the end of the 18th century to 1956, when the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey big top was pulled down for the last time. Sharon Grimberg, Directed by American Experience: The Eugenics Crusade October 16, 2018 American Experience: The Eugenics Crusade explores the unknown campaign to breed a “better” American race.
  • Capability by Stacking: the Current Design Heuristic for Soft Robots

    Capability by Stacking: the Current Design Heuristic for Soft Robots

    biomimetics Review Capability by Stacking: The Current Design Heuristic for Soft Robots Stephen T. Mahon 1 ID , Jamie O. Roberts 1,2, Mohammed E. Sayed 1, Derek Ho-Tak Chun 1,2 ID , Simona Aracri 1, Ross M. McKenzie 1,2, Markus P. Nemitz 1,3 and Adam A. Stokes 1,* 1 School of Engineering, The Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, The University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3LJ, UK; [email protected] (S.T.M.); [email protected] (J.O.R.); [email protected] (M.E.S.); [email protected] (D.H.-T.C.); [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (R.M.M.); [email protected] (M.P.N.) 2 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Robotics and Autonomous Systems, School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3LJ, UK 3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, 2260 Hayward St. BBB3737, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-131-650-5611 Received: 1 June 2018; Accepted: 10 July 2018; Published: 13 July 2018 Abstract: Soft robots are a new class of systems being developed and studied by robotics scientists. These systems have a diverse range of applications including sub-sea manipulation and rehabilitative robotics. In their current state of development, the prevalent paradigm for the control architecture in these systems is a one-to-one mapping of controller outputs to actuators.
  • Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology
  • Apple Strategy Teardown

    Apple Strategy Teardown

    Apple Strategy Teardown The maverick of personal computing is looking for its next big thing in spaces like healthcare, AR, and autonomous cars, all while keeping its lead in consumer hardware. With an uphill battle in AI, slowing growth in smartphones, and its fingers in so many pies, can Apple reinvent itself for a third time? In many ways, Apple remains a company made in the image of Steve Jobs: iconoclastic and fiercely product focused. But today, Apple is at a crossroads. Under CEO Tim Cook, Apple’s ability to seize on emerging technology raises many new questions. Primarily, what’s next for Apple? Looking for the next wave, Apple is clearly expanding into augmented reality and wearables with the Apple Watch AirPods wireless headphones. Though delayed, Apple’s HomePod speaker system is poised to expand Siri’s footprint into the home and serve as a competitor to Amazon’s blockbuster Echo device and accompanying virtual assistant Alexa. But the next “big one” — a success and growth driver on the scale of the iPhone — has not yet been determined. Will it be augmented reality, healthcare, wearables? Or something else entirely? Apple is famously secretive, and a cloud of hearsay and gossip surrounds the company’s every move. Apple is believed to be working on augmented reality headsets, connected car software, transformative healthcare devices and apps, as well as smart home tech, and new machine learning applications. We dug through Apple’s trove of patents, acquisitions, earnings calls, recent product releases, and organizational structure for concrete hints at how the company will approach its next self-reinvention.
  • Public Support for Science and Innovation

    Public Support for Science and Innovation

    Public Support for Science and Innovation A supplementary submission to the Productivity Commission from CSIRO responding to the draft report December 2006 Introduction and overview CSIRO believes that the draft report on public support for science and innovation makes a substantial contribution to discussions on the rationale for such support and on the benefits that flow to Australia from public investment in science. The findings of the report result from a rigorous analysis of available data using a variety of methods; acknowledge the considerable difficulties that can exist in trying to quantify even the economic returns that result from public sector support for science and innovation; and take a realistically broad view of the range of tangible and intangible benefits that such investment can produce. The report and the debate it generates should provide an opportunity to re-set the baselines for what publicly supported research does, and why. CSIRO in general supports the findings and conclusions of the report, which are fair, balanced and recognise the uncertainties that will always exist. While the findings that there ‘are strong rationales for the provision of public funding support for science and innovation’ and that ‘there are significant positive economic, social and environmental impacts from publicly supported science and innovation’ are not surprising, they are none the less welcome as the conclusions of an independent disinterested, technical study. Another important feature of the report is that it makes explicit the diversity of pathways through which science can have impact. This puts commercialisation into perspective as only one of many possible pathways to impact, noting that too great a focus on commercialisation can divert attention from some broader and even more important outcomes of research.