HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing Review of 15 Countries in Europe and Central Asia Sustainability Livability HOUSING REVIEW 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing Review of 15 Countries in Europe and Central Asia Sustainability Livability HOUSING REVIEW 2015 AffordabilityHOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia Sustainability Livability HOUSING REVIEW 2015 1 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia Housing Review 2015 AFFORDABILITY, LIVABILITY, SUSTAINABILITY On the cover A girl washes her feet from a water tap in the interior courtyard of a block of flats in Baia Mare, Romania on July 21, 2011 where the mayor has decided to construct a wall around the flats housing a majority of Roma families. ©AFP PHOTO/Daniel Mihailescu 2 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia Housing Review 2015 AFFORDABILITY, LIVABILITY, SUSTAINABILITY 3 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Habitat for Humanity would like to acknowledge the contribution of the authors, editorial team, proofreader and designer to the 2015 Housing Review. Authors Dr. József Hegedüs and Vera Horváth (Housing in Europe) Dr. Marja Elsinga and Dr. Marietta Haffner (Affordability) Michelle Norris and Anna Carnegie (Sustainability) Dr. Christiane Droste (Livability) Habitat for Humanity staff (All boxes in chapters) Dr. Wolfgang Amann (Part Two) Images and illustrations Kai Klump (planungsgruppe agsn) Geert de Pauw (Community Land Trust Brussels) Claire Carriou Tina Bühner (GrandHotel Cosmopolis) Jutta Geisenhofer Sabina Prommersberger (Frauenwohnen eG) Bence Komlosi (GrandHome Budapest) Andreas Delleske Dinah Roake (Brixton Green) Nick Philipps (metwork) Editorial team Christopher Sorek and Katerina Bezgachina, Habitat for Humanity, Europe, Middle East and Africa Lani Charlwood, Habitat for Humanity Great Britain Managing editor Jean Milligan Proofreader: Adam Smith, Habitat for Humanity International Design and layout: Barbora Fricova, Habitat for Humanity, Europe, Middle East and Africa 4 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 FOREWORD 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PART ONE: HOUSING ASSESSMENT 2015 9 Chapter I Housing in Europe 11 Chapter II Affordability 29 Chapter III Sustainability 43 Chapter IV Livability 57 PART TWO: HOUSING REVIEW OF 15 COUNTRIES IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA 77 Chapter A Housing Stock and Provision 79 Chapter B Housing Construction, Markets, Housing Finance 107 Chapter C Demography, Economy, Living Conditions 121 Chapter D Annex 135 5 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia FOREWORD The housing crisis sparked by the 2008 global financial meltdown is far from over in Europe. The facts listed in the 2015 Habitat for Humanity Housing Review make evident this silent emergency. Some 10.1 percent of European households suffer from housing cost overburden, and 36.9 percent of these are also at risk of poverty. According to Eurostat, nearly 50 million Europeans (9.6 percent of the European Union’s population) live in severe material deprivation. This rate is almost twice as high (18.6 percent) in new member states. Resolution of the crisis does not look imminent as the share of young adults age 18-34 living with their parents is at record highs, reaching 55 percent of young adults in Portugal, 66 percent in Italy, and 74 percent in Slovenia. The housing situation for Europe’s middle- and low-income groups has not improved significantly since the 2013 Housing Review. Despite this, Habitat remains determined to push for change, and help lead and define new policies. Our aspiration with the 2015 Housing Review is to continue to raise the alarm on Europe’s housing crisis, to shape the debate on regional and national housing policy discussions, and increase understanding among politicians, governmental officials, academics and civil society on what it means to provide affordable, sustainable and livable housing for Europe’s middle- and low-income groups. What emerges in the three thematic chapters is that Europe needs to look at better ways of developing and providing housing that helps Europeans, regardless of class or income, have a decent place to live. It needs to augment investment in sustainable housing ranging from building materials and technology to construction practices to make current and future building more resilient, environmentally friendly and economically viable. Finally, the trends and threats to Europe’s middle- and low-income neighbourhoods need to be analysed and concrete solutions developed to ensure the region’s cities remain livable for everyone. The 2015 Housing Review concludes with updated statistics and analysis, based on the 2013 edition, on housing in 15 European and Central Asian countries. The most worrying trend is the limited, or in some countries the complete lack of, new social housing. The arrival of thousands of refugees from conflicts in the Middle East and Africa over the past 18 months means more people than ever in Europe need access to social housing. Habitat is alarmed that only a very few European countries are responding on a large scale to this worrying shortage. Our next step is to make certain that the issues raised in this Review are at the core of regional and national discussions. In the longer term, we will publish biannual reports that monitor the state of housing in Europe. The goal is to be an alternative reference publication, which offers independent expert analysis on Europe’s housing industry. Finally, this publication is one pillar in Habitat’s regional efforts to ensure that Europe’s political and private sector leadership do not forget that middle and low-income people need safe and livable homes today and in the future. Greg Foster Area Vice President Europe, Middle East and Africa Habitat for Humanity International 6 HOUSING REVIEW 2015 Housing review of 15 countries in Europe and Central Asia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Europe’s middle- and lower-income groups are facing a landscape, while also identifying good practices. The major housing crisis. According to the European Union’s closing section identifies the barriers to the effective design statistics agency, Eurostat, 3 million people in the region and implementation of sustainable housing policies. were homeless in 2010, while 17 percent were ill-housed, meaning they lived in poor conditions or were threatened Part One, Chapter 4 aims to clarify the many definitions with losing their home. The situation has improved little of livability, how it is incorporated into European policy, in the past five years. and the current research of non-governmental housing organizations advocating for affordable housing. The The 2015 Housing Review from Habitat for Humanity chapter goes on to explore the main threats to Europe’s aims to shape the debate around Europe’s multitude of middle and low-income neighborhoods. It raises alarm housing policies. The review looks at the latest European on the increasing gap across all larger European cities housing crisis through three themes: between poverty and affluence, dynamic and poor areas, centre and periphery – spatial and social. Affordability — getting people into housing and keeping them there. It concludes by advocating for community-driven social housing programs that have the potential to provide Sustainability — building energy-efficient, environmen- opportunities to create new homes for low-income groups. tally friendly residential housing and living spaces. Concrete examples are provided from different European countries of community-driven housing and land-use to Livability — creating communities of the future through show the positive impact these programs have had on social integration and community building. low-income communities. These bottom-up initiatives open up new perspectives on potential partnerships and The review, which is divided into two parts, each with community-driven opportunities to respond to the major four chapters, examines the issues and offers long-term trends in society and neighborhoods. solutions that could provide fair housing for Europe’s middle- and lower-income citizens. Part Two is an update of the 2013 Housing Review with the latest numbers and new information related to Part One, Chapter 1 includes an overview of the latest housing in Europe and Central Asian (ECA) countries. facts and figures related to the three themes. It assesses The latest figures show there are some positive trends, the diversity of housing problems throughout the region with ownership increasing to 90 percent in most ECA and provides insight into challenges the “new poor” countries. Additionally, housing costs in relation to living in urban centers and the “traditional poor” in total household expenditures remained stable in most rural areas are facing in relation to housing. It advocates countries or even decreased as governmental policies for a convergence of national housing policies into one succeeded in keeping costs in line. The bad news is that European model that can be adapted to different contexts. the rental sector is stagnant and social rental housing has further declined in most ECA countries, and housing Part One, Chapter 2 highlights measures of housing policies are not prepared to handle the demographic shift affordability in order to better understand the extent of of an aging population that does not have the financial the problem; review trends, policies and practices over the means to maintain their homes. past century; and analyze current efforts to help resolve, or at least alleviate, affordability problems for Europe’s The review ends with an annex providing
Recommended publications
  • 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan
    JRC SCIENCE AND POLICY REPORTS 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan Technology Descriptions Report EUR 26345 EN Joint Research Centre JRC13_TMAP_08AP14_P5-NS-Print.indd 1 09/04/2014 16:20:55 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact: Johan Carlsson Address: Joint Research Centre, 3 Westerduinweg 1755 LE Petten the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +31 224565341 Fax: +31 224565616 http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ This publication is a Scientific and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC86357 EUR 26345 EN ISBN 978-92-79-34721-4 (print) ISBN 978-92-79-34720-7 (pdf) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) doi: 10.2790/9986 (print) doi: 10.2790/99812 (online) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Luxembourg JRC13_TMAP_08AP14_P5-NS-Print.indd 2 09/04/2014 16:20:55 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) Technology Descriptions JRC13_TMAP_08AP14_P5-NS-Print.indd 1 09/04/2014 16:20:55 JRC13_TMAP_08AP14_P5-NS-Print.indd 2 09/04/2014 16:20:56 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of Epigean Freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) in Romania: Fragmented Distributions and Wide Altitudinal Variability
    Zootaxa 3893 (2): 243–260 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3893.2.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8336FFDA-F1A5-4026-A5B6-CCEBFF84F40A Zoogeography of epigean freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) in Romania: fragmented distributions and wide altitudinal variability DENIS COPILAȘ-CIOCIANU1, MICHAŁ GRABOWSKI2, LUCIAN PÂRVULESCU3 & ADAM PETRUSEK1 1Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Viničná 7, 12844, Prague, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2University of Łódź, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology & Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237, Łódź, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] 3West University of Timișoara, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Pestalozzi 16A, 300115, Timișoara, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Inland epigean freshwater amphipods of Romania are diverse and abundant for this region has a favourable geographical position between the Balkans and the Black Sea. Excluding Ponto-Caspian species originating in brackish waters and freshwater subterranean taxa, there are 11 formally recognized epigean freshwater species recorded from this country. They belong to 3 genera, each representing a different family: Gammarus (Gammaridae, 8 species or species complexes), Niphargus (Niphargidae, 2 epigean species) and Synurella (Crangonyctidae, one species). Their large-scale distribution patterns nevertheless remain obscure due to insufficient data, consequently limiting biogeographical interpretations. We provide extensive new data with high resolution distribution maps, thus improving the knowledge of the ranges of these taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trillion Dollar Question: Tracking Public and Private Investment in Transport
    Working Paper THE TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION: TRACKING PUBLIC AND PRIVate INVESTMENT IN TRANSport BENOIT LEFEVRE, DAVID LEIPZIGER, MATTHEW RAIFMAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS In a first step to quantify global public and private invest- ment in transport across all modes, WRI estimated annual Executive Summary............................................................1 capital expenditures (excluding consumer spending) at Introduction........................................................................2 between US$1.4 trillion and US$2.1 trillion annually Investment Estimates .........................................................3 (Figure 1). In aggregate, this investment consists of Conclusions .......................................................................6 slightly more private investment than public. Public investment, at US$569 billion to US$905 billion per year, Appendix ............................................................................8 consists almost exclusively of domestic budget expendi- References ........................................................................12 tures. In 2010, 2 percent of public investment was inter- national, mostly provided through official development assistance (ODA). Less than half a percent comes from Disclaimer: Working Papers contain preliminary climate-focused funds and institutions. Private investment, research, analysis, findings, and recommendations. They including both domestic and cross-border flows, is esti- are circulated to stimulate timely discussion and critical
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Radical Right Populism and Their Discourses in Public Spheres: the Case of Romania and Hungary
    Mapping the radical right populism and their discourses in public spheres: the case of Romania and Hungary RESEARCH PLAN Aim of the project Despite the growing body of literature which explains the emergence and the electoral contours of radical right populism in Central and Eastern Europe (e.g. Minkenberg 2002, Hanley et al. 2008, Mudde 2005, Kovács 2013, Auers–Kasekamp 2013) we have sporadic knowledge about the radical right mass communication channels and media discourses. Cross-country researches with comparative focus are particularly needed to gain more insight into the contemporary nature of the radical right populism. The proposed project fills this gap by conducting a cross-case analysis focusing on Romania and Hungary. The aim is twofold. First, we envisage an analysis of the characteristics of media discourses of the radical right. Second, we aim to identify the positions of the radical right populist media products within the network structure of the general media sphere. Our purpose is to shed lights on one of the major public issues in our region: the communicative construction of radical right populism and its location in the public spheres. Case selection: why Romania and Hungary? Romania and Hungary are excellent comparative cases as countries with different electoral patterns concerning the radical right populism. In Romania, the radical right political parties gained significant electoral success soon after the collapse of the communist regime and by 2000 the Greater Romania Party (Partidul România Mare, PRM) became the largest opposition force. Contrary to the wider European trend, popular support for the PRM has declined so far and no other radical right-wing group has managed to replicate its electoral performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Control Policy-Making in Portugal: Vested Interests Or Public
    Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Industry Monitoring Letter Tobacco control policy-making in Portugal: vested interests or public health? Sofia Ravara1,2, Hilson Cunh Filho2,3, Paula Lobato Faria4, Natercia Miranda2, Jose Manuel Calheiros1,2 INTRODUCTION acceptance of the tobacco industry and interfere 4,14 Tobacco use remains a threat to global health in policy-making . AFFILIATION and socio-economic development1. In order to Currently, the EU has a window of opportunity 1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of curb the tobacco epidemic, the World Health to advance TC: the implementation of the Tobacco Beira Interior, Covilha, Organisation (WHO) developed the Framework Products Directive (TPD)15. The challenge now Portugal 2 Centre for Advocacy, Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), facing EU MS is its transposition into national Treatment and which aims to protect populations from tobacco legislation, effective enforcement and subsequent Reabilitation, NGO(CATR), 2 monitoring. Lisbon, Portugal consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke . 3 Faculty of Social The FCTC binds its ratifying parties, such as The weaknesses of loopholes in tobacco Sciences and Humanities, 4, 16-17 NOVA University of Lisbon, the European Union (EU) and the EU Member control policy-making are well documented . Portugal States (MS), to implement evidence-based Following FCTC ratification by Portugal in 2005, 4 National School of Public 2 Health, NOVA University of tobacco control (TC) policies . Although FCTC a new tobacco law was approved in 2007 and Lisbon, Portugal policies are implementable at the EU and MS came into force in January 200818. Cunha-Filho et CORRESPONDENCE TO level, Europe still ranks first regarding smoking al., using the case of the Portuguese 2007 tobacco Ravara S.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT REPORT Influenza Season 2012–2013 in Europe: Moderate
    Epidemiol. Infect. (2014), 142, 1809–1812. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2014 doi:10.1017/S0950268814001228 SHORT REPORT Influenza season 2012–2013 in Europe: moderate intensity, mixed (sub)types R. SNACKEN1*, E. BROBERG1,J.BEAUTÉ1,J.E.LOZANO2,P.ZUCS1 1 AND A. J. AMATO-GAUCI on behalf of the European Influenza Surveillance Network 1 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden 2 Public Health Directorate General, Regional Ministry of Health. Government of Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain Received 30 October 2013; Final revision 21 March 2014; Accepted 23 April 2014; first published online 9 May 2014 SUMMARY This paper summarizes influenza activity in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) in 2012–2013. The influenza season 2012–2013 in Europe lasted from early December to late April. Overall the severity of the season could be described as moderate, based on the ILI/ARI consultation rates and the percentage of sentinel specimens positive for influenza compared to previous seasons. Both influenza A and B viruses circulating accounted for 47% and 53% of positive sentinel specimens, respectively, with both A(H1) and A(H3) varying for dominance. Compared to outpatients, the proportion of laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalized cases infected by A(H1N1)pdm09 was significantly higher in middle-aged patients (33% vs. 17%, χ2 =66·6, P<0·01). Despite a relatively good match between vaccine and circulating strains, vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be moderate. Key words:
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Socially Integrative Cities
    Towards Socially Integrative Cities Bernhard Müller, Jian Liu, Jianming Cai, Paulina Schiappacasse, Hans-Martin Neumann and Baojun Yang (Eds.) Towards Socially Integrative Cities Perspectives on Urban Sustainability in Europe and China MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tianjin • Tokyo • Cluj EDITORS Bernhard Müller Jian Liu Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Tsinghua University, Dresden, Germany Beijing, China Jianming Cai Paulina Schiappacasse IGSNRR, Chinese Academy of Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Sciences (CAS), Dresden, Germany Beijing, China Hans-Martin Neumann Baojun Yang Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT), China Academy of Urban Vienna, Austria Planning and Design (CAUPD), Beijing, China EDITORIAL OFFICE MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated below: Author 1, and Author 2. 2021. Chapter Title. In Towards Socially Integrative Cities. Perspectives on Urban Sustainability in Europe and China. Edited by Bernhard Müller, Jian Liu, Jianming Cai, Paulina Schiappacasse, Hans-Martin Neumann and Baojun Yang. Basel: MDPI, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03936-678-1 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03936-679-8 (PDF) doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03936-679-8 © 2021 by the authors. Chapters in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum
    [Show full text]
  • 20, Rue De Lille 59140 DUNKERQUE Tél. : 03 28 29 22 92
    Groupe EPID/VAUBAN 20, rue de Lille 59140 DUNKERQUE Tél. : 03 28 29 22 92 www.epid.fr 1, place Vauban 59140 DUNKERQUE Tél. : 03 28 29 26 40 www.lycee-vauban-dunkerque.com Editorial INNOVER : c’est l’un des thèmes de cette REFLECHIR : est l’autre thème qui mettra les année scolaire 2015 2016 pour le groupe équipes éducatives du groupe en réflexion. EPID/Vauban. Comment partir de 2 histoires, 2 entités Aller de l’avant, être force de proposition différentes pour écrire un projet d’é tablis­ pédagogique, innover… Et toujours au service sement commun, dans lequel chacun pourra du jeune. se reconnaître sans effacer ce qui s’est vécu Cette année, nous avons créé la 2nde Avenir, en avant et qui fait ce que sont l’EPID et le Lycée regroupant les 2ndes GT de l’EPID et de Vauban, Vauban aujourd’hui ? sur le site de Vauban. C’est un challenge passionnant, qui sera relevé Ce qui nous permet d’offrir un plus large choix d’en­ cette année. seignements d’exploration, d’options et de sections Chaque membre de l’équipe éducative : enseignant, sportives. L’objectif visé est de mieux accompagner les APEL, personnel OGEC sera mobilisé pour réfléchir jeunes durant cette année de transition entre le collège ensemble et écrire les valeurs que nous portons lors­ et le cycle terminal du lycée, et de leur permettre de qu’un jeune vient s’inscrire soit sur le site de l’EPID, soit préparer en toute sérénité leur orientation de fin de 2nde. sur le site de Vauban, quelle que soit la formation qu’il souhaite suivre.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat for Humanity St. Tammany West (HFHSTW) Using Generally Accepted Research Methods, Models and Techniques
    October 3, 2011 The Southeastern Louisiana University Business Research Center (BRC) is jointly operated by the Southeast Louisiana Business Center and the Southeastern College of Business. The BRC provides applied economic analyses and research studies that aid business and economic development efforts for the five‐parish Northshore region of southeast Louisiana. The Center represents one aspect of the University’s commitment to economic development in the region. The Center is located in the Southeast Louisiana Business Center on Martens Drive, two blocks west of the main campus of Southeastern Louisiana University. The Business Research Center is a proud member of the Association for University Business and Economic Research (AUBER) and the Council for Community and Economic Research (C2ER). The following study was conducted at the request of Habitat for Humanity St. Tammany West (HFHSTW) using generally accepted research methods, models and techniques. The research, results and report are copyrighted ©, but may be reproduced and distributed through any means, provided the report is reproduced in its entirety with the Southeastern Louisiana University name and logo attached. The information gathered and/or study results are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for investment or lending decisions. Research and results of this study do not represent any form of endorsement by Southeastern Louisiana University. Sincerely, William Joubert Director Business Research Center Southeastern Louisiana University Business Research Center A Collaborative Effort of the Southeast Louisiana Business Center and the Southeastern Louisiana University College of Business 1 Estimated Economic Impacts of the Activities of: Habitat for Humanity St. Tammany West October 2011 Southeastern Louisiana University Business Research Center & College of Business Herb Holloway Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Quilvest Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents General Section Part One List of Directors and Group Management 7 Chairman’s Statement 8 Executive Management’s Statement 9 Group Highlights 13 Financial Section Part Two Director’s report 25 Auditor’s report 28 Consolidated Financial Statements 32 ANNUAL REPORT | 3 General Section is a financial holding company whose activities are in the wealth management QUILVEST and private equity & real estate business. was incorporated in Paris on 20 September 1888. The Group established in Luxembourg in 1960. Since the spin-off of the industrial activities QUILVEST in 1991, it has solely focused on managing financial assets with private banks -in Switzerland established in 1932 - in France established in 1917 and -in Luxembourg which combined its activities in 2011. QUILVEST’s global Private Equity activities date back to 1972. consists of almost 400 professionals with offices in Luxembourg, New York, Zurich, Geneva, Paris, Dubai, London, Montevideo, Hong Kong, Singapore, QUILVEST Ghent, Brussels and Santiago de Chile. 6 | ANNUAL REPORT List of Directors and Group Management Board of Directors Chairman Christian Baillet Directors Robin Filmer-Wilson Philippe Hoss Robert Kneip François Manset Stanislas Poniatowski Alvaro Sainz de Vicuña Jean-Louis Schiltz Gonzalo Tanoira International Advisory Services (until 6 December 2017) (represented by Christian Baillet) Vauban Participations S.A. (represented by Norbert Becker) Audit Committee François Manset, President Christian Baillet Norbert Becker
    [Show full text]
  • FRANET Migrants and Their Descendants: Social Inclusion And
    FRANET Migrants and their Descendants: Social Inclusion and Participation in Society Romania, 2015 FRANET contractor: Human European Consultancy Authors: Voicu, O., Bucur, A. Reviewed by: Iordache, R. Language editor: Grant, A. DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Social Inclusion and Migrant Participation in Society’. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. 1 Table of Contents Executive summary................................................................................................ 4 1.Legal and policy instruments for migrant integration ..................... 10 1.1.Description of existing instruments and target groups .............. 10 1.2. Drivers & barriers in developing, implementing and assessing legal and policy instruments ........................................................................... 12 1.2.1.Drivers ........................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.2.Barriers .......................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3.Language learning and integration tests
    [Show full text]
  • Cinergy Citizens for Energy Cinergy Citizens for Energy
    CINERGY CITIZENS FOR ENERGY CINERGY CITIZENS FOR ENERGY Anamarija Jere Written by Giulia Dakli Salvatore Altiero Simona Maltese Ce.S.F.Or. Contributions A Sud Ecologia e Cooperazione Low Carbon Communities Network Za Zemiata Asociatia Prietenii Pamantului DOOR CIPRA Slovenia London Borough of Haringey Front cover Grega Žorž and layout The contents of this report may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the authors, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. This publication was developed as a part of the project CINERGY – Citizens for Energy (LLP Gruntvig). This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily reflective of Haringey Council June, 2014 Visit our project database at www.cinergyproject.eu More info at: [email protected] Index About the cinergy project 1 1. Eu legislation, directives and tools towards a post-carbon europe 5 1.1. “Energy conflicts”: new challenges for energy policies, beyond the protection of the environment and the struggle against climate change 5 1.2 From conflicts over the hoarding of resources to environmental conflicts: energy policies and climate change 7 1.3 First conclusions: geopolitics versus the biosphere 9 1.4 The enhancement of the critical aspects of the ets in times of financial crisis 11 1.5 European strategy on renewable energy from its birth 13 1.6.
    [Show full text]