“The King's Good Servant, but God's First: Responses in Canon and Civil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“The King's Good Servant, but God's First: Responses in Canon and Civil “The King’s Good Servant, but God’s First: Responses in Canon and Civil Law to Governmental Threats to the Church’s Freedom to Carry Out Her Mission” Speculum Iustitiae Conference for Canon and Civil Lawyers Shrine Of Our Lady Of Guadalupe La Crosse, Wisconsin August 3, 2021 Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, STL, MBA, JD, JCD Bishop of Springfield in Illinois Adjunct Professor of Law Notre Dame Law School Summary This presentation on “Responses in Canon and Civil Law to Governmental Threats to the Church’s Freedom to Carry Out Her Mission” will begin with examining the basic foundations for religious freedom in theology and natural law. After surveying key canons from the Code of Canon Law that deal with the rights of the Church and her faithful, an overview will be given examining some key cases of the United States Supreme Court dealing with COVID restrictions on freedom of worship; same-sex marriage; foster care and adoption services; abortion, contraceptive and abortifacient mandates; school funding; Blaine amendments; church and school employees/ministers; school prayer; and public expressions of religion. Finally, some resources will be noted highlighting organizations providing legal assistance for litigation involving religious liberty. I. Religious liberty in theology and natural law The title of this presentation is, “The King’s Good Servant, but God’s First: Responses in Canon and Civil Law to Governmental Threats to the Church’s Freedom to Carry Out Her Mission.” Not too long ago, references to “Governmental Threats to the Church’s Freedom to Carry Out Her Mission” would have brought to mind the repressive atheistic regimes of the Soviet Union and Communist China, as well as the ant-Christian laws of Muslim-dominated countries such as Saudi Arabia. While Communist China and predominantly Muslim nations certainly continue to impede the Church’s freedom to carry out her mission, it is disconcerting, to say the least, that threats to the Church’s freedom to carry out her mission are becoming 2 increasingly apparent here in the United States. It is here in our domestic context that I will focus our attention. A. Maxim: “Law follows theology” In the canon law courses that I teach at Notre Dame Law School, I emphasize the maxim that “law follows theology.” By that I mean that we canon lawyers do not just sit around making up canon law out of thin air. The norms of canon law emanate from the teachings of Sacred Scripture and the principles of our faith in the Sacred Tradition of the Church as handed down over the past 2,000 years by lawful ecclesiastical authority. Thus, the canons of the Code of Canon Law that address the preeminence of divine law and canon law over civil law are based on Sacred Scripture and Tradition. So we will look at some of these principles first. B. Sacred Scripture on the Preeminence of Divine Law The classic biblical basis for the relationship between religious belief and government authority is found in the instruction from Jesus for His disciples to “render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s,” in the translation that is most familiar to English-speaking people (cf. Matthew 22:21 and Mark 12:17). While at first hearing it may seem that Our Lord is making a neat distinction between Church and State, the more incisive listener will realize that since God is the Creator of the universe, everything in it effectively belongs to Him. Nevertheless, Our Lord is allowing that there are circumstances in which civil authority should be followed as long as they are not contrary to divine purposes. Thus, Saint Peter wrote that Christians should “Be subject to every human institution for the Lord’s sake, whether it be to the king as supreme or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the approval of those who do good. For it is the will of God that 3 by doing good you may silence the ignorance of foolish people.” But he quickly adds, “Be free, yet without using freedom as a pretext for evil, but as slaves of God” (1 Peter 2:13-16). We see Saint Peter put this teaching into practice in the Acts of the Apostles, which tells us about the activities of the first Christians during the earliest days of the Church. There we read that when the apostles were imprisoned for preaching about Jesus, the angel of the Lord opened the doors of the prison during the night and led them out, and said, “Go and take your place in the temple area, and tell the people everything about this life.” When they heard this, they went to the temple early in the morning and taught. When the high priest and his companions arrived, they convened the Sanhedrin, the full senate of the Israelites, and sent to the jail to have them brought in. But the court officers who went did not find them in the prison, so they came back and reported, “We found the jail securely locked and the guards stationed outside the doors, but when we opened them, we found no one inside.” When they heard this report, the captain of the temple guard and the chief priests were at a loss about them, as to what this would come to. Then someone came in and reported to them, “The men whom you put in prison are in the temple area and are teaching the people.” Then the captain and the court officers went and brought them in, but without force, because they were afraid of being stoned by the people. When they had brought them in and made them stand before the Sanhedrin, the high priest questioned them, “We gave you strict orders [did we not?] to stop teaching in that name. Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and want to bring this man’s blood upon us.” But Peter and the apostles said in reply, “We must obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:20-29) Thus, we see both in the teachings of Jesus and the life of Saint Peter, the premise that Christians should generally comply with civil authority, however, that compliance is not absolute, but is conditioned on civil authority being subservient to the divine law. 4 C. St. Thomas Aquinas on religious liberty A comprehensive study of Thomistic thought on religious liberty if beyond the scope of this presentation, but a brief mention of some key themes will be illustrative. Saint Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor, taught that unbelievers who have never received the faith should not be compelled to believe. He wrote: Among unbelievers there are some who have never received the faith, such as the heathens and the Jews: and these are by no means to be compelled to the faith, in order that they may believe, because to believe depends on the will: nevertheless they should be compelled by the faithful, if it be possible to do so, so that they do not hinder the faith, by their blasphemies, or by their evil persuasions, or even by their open persecutions. It is for this reason that Christ's faithful often wage war with unbelievers, not indeed for the purpose of forcing them to believe, because even if they were to conquer them, and take them prisoners, they should still leave them free to believe, if they will, but in order to prevent them from hindering the faith of Christ.1 The corollary of this argument is that the faithful should not be compelled to act contrary to their beliefs. While Aquinas did argue that heretics should be compelled to keep the faith, he saw this more as a matter of enforcing the obligations of believers who had freely accepted the faith and thus were abjuring their promises as distinguished from compelling belief ab initio.2 D. St. Thomas Becket’s witness to the rights of the Church vs. the State St. Thomas Becket was born around 1118 in London, England. He served as Chancellor of England (1155–62) and Archbishop of Canterbury (1162–70) during the reign of King Henry 5 II. His career was marked by a long quarrel with Henry that ended with Becket’s murder in Canterbury Cathedral on December 29, 1170. He is venerated as a saint and martyr in the Roman Catholic Church and in the Anglican Communion. He was canonized in 1173 and his feast day is December 29th.3 E. St. Thomas More and St. John Fisher’s witness to the priority of God’s law The home page for Religious Freedom Week on the website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has the following description of the heroic witness of the lives of Saints Thomas More and John Fisher: Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher were Renaissance men. Talented and energetic, they contributed to the humanist scholarship of early modern England. More wrote theological and philosophical treatises, while making a career as a lawyer and government official. Bishop John Fisher worked as an administrator at Cambridge, confronted the challenge Martin Luther presented to Christian Europe, and most importantly served as Bishop of Rochester. As a bishop, he is notable for his dedication to preaching at a time when bishops tended to focus on politics. These men were brilliant. They both corresponded with Erasmus, who helped Bishop Fisher learn Greek and Hebrew, and who also famously referred to More as a man for all seasons [which is the title of the 1964 movie about his life.
Recommended publications
  • WHAT IS TRINITY SUNDAY? Trinity Sunday Is the First Sunday After Pentecost in the Western Christian Liturgical Calendar, and Pentecost Sunday in Eastern Christianity
    The Blessed Trinity with Crown, by Max Fürst (1846–1917) Welcome to OUR 15th VIRTUAL GSP class! Trinity Sunday and the Triune God WHAT IS IT? WHY IS IT? Presented by Charles E.Dickson,Ph.D. First Sunday after Pentecost: Trinity Sunday Almighty and everlasting God, who hast given unto us thy servants grace, by the confession of a true faith, to acknowledge the glory of the eternal Trinity, and in the power of the Divine Majesty to worship the Unity: We beseech thee that thou wouldest keep us steadfast in this faith and worship, and bring us at last to see thee in thy one and eternal glory, O Father; who with the Son and the Holy Spirit livest and reignest, one God, for ever and ever. Amen. WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF THIS COLLECT? This collect, found in the first Book of Common Prayer, derives from a little sacramentary of votive Masses for the private devotion of priests prepared by Alcuin of York (c.735-804), a major contributor to the Carolingian Renaissance. It is similar to proper prefaces found in the 8th-century Gelasian and 10th- century Gregorian Sacramentaries. Gelasian Sacramentary WHAT IS TRINITY SUNDAY? Trinity Sunday is the first Sunday after Pentecost in the Western Christian liturgical calendar, and Pentecost Sunday in Eastern Christianity. It is eight weeks after Easter Sunday. The earliest possible date is 17 May and the latest possible date is 20 June. In 2021 it occurs on 30 May. One of the seven principal church year feasts (BCP, p. 15), Trinity Sunday celebrates the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, the three Persons of God: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, “the one and equal glory” of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, “in Trinity of Persons and in Unity of Being” (BCP, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Note to Users
    NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie Wellington OMW~ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Yw#e votm rf5mrDnœ Our hLB NMe référence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libraty of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distriiute or sell reproduire, prêter, distriiuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fonne de microfiche/fllml de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être impximés reproduceà without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. English Historians' Treatments of Sir Thomas More and Bishop John Fisher in the Sixteenth and Nineteenth Gmhmies by John C. R Taylor-Hood A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fullillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Deparfment of History Mernorial University of Newf'oundland St. John's nie siuteenth-oentury personages of Sir Th011185 More and Bishop John Fiiher have repeatedy appeanxî as signiticant figures in historical works.
    [Show full text]
  • Life, Liberty and Law Foundation
    NOS. 13-354, 13-356 In the Supreme Court of the United States KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, ET AL., Petitioners, v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., ET AL., Respondents. CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORP., ET AL., Petitioners, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, ET AL., Respondents. On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Tenth and Third Circuits BRIEF OF LIBERTY, LIFE , AND LAW FOUNDATION, THOMAS MORE SOCIETY, AND CHRISTIAN FAMILY COALTION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF HOBBY LOBBY AND CONESTOGA, ET AL. Thomas Brejcha Deborah J. Dewart Thomas More Society Counsel of Record President and Chief Counsel 620 E. Sabiston Drive 19 S. LaSalle, Ste. 603 Swansboro, NC 28584 Chicago, IL 60603 (910) 326-4554 (312) 782-1680 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation, Thomas More Society, and Christian Family Coalition Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................. iv INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................ 2 ARGUMENT............................... 3 I. OPERATING A PRIVATE BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSCIENCE IS NOT THE INVIDIOUS, IRRATIONAL, ARBITRARY DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED BY THE CONSTITUTION. 3 A. Respect For Individual Conscience Is Deeply Rooted In American History..... 4 B. Courts Have Long Respected The Conscience Rights Of Both Patients And Health Care Professionals............. 6 C. Like Many Successful Free Exercise Cases, This Case Involves Conscientious Objectors—Not Civil Disobedience. ..... 7 II. AN EMPLOYER’S REFUSAL TO FINANCE OR FACILITATE CONTRACEPTION IS NOT THE INVIDIOUS, IRRATIONAL, ARBITRARY DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED BY THE CONSTITUTION. 8 ii A.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Version
    Case 3:16-cv-00236-WHO Document 609 Filed 05/23/19 Page 1 of 29 Charles S. LiMandri (CA Bar No. 110841) Thomas Brejcha, pro hac vice 1 Paul M. Jonna (CA Bar No. 265389) Peter Breen, pro hac vice Jeffrey M. Trissell (CA Bar No. 292480) 2 B. Dean Wilson (CA Bar No. 305844) THOMAS MORE SOCIETY FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE DEFENSE FUND 309 W. Washington St., Ste. 1250 3 P.O. Box 9520 Chicago, IL 60606 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Tel: (312) 782-1680 4 Tel: (858) 759-9948 [email protected] [email protected] 5 [email protected] Denise M. Harle (CA Bar No. 275561) 6 ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM Matthew F. Heffron, pro hac vice 1000 Hurricane Shoals Rd., NE THOMAS MORE SOCIETY 7 Suite D1100 10506 Burt Circle, Suite 110 Lawrenceville, GA 30043 8 Tel: (770) 339-0774 501 Scoular Building [email protected] Omaha, NE 68114 9 Tel: (312) 782-1680 Harmeet K. Dhillon (CA Bar No. 207873) [email protected] 10 Gregory R. Michael (CA Bar No. 306814) DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 11 177 Post Street, Suite 700 Attorneys for Defendant David Daleiden San Francisco, CA 94108 12 415-433-1700 415-520-6593 (fax) 13 [email protected] 14 Attorneys for Defendant David Daleiden 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 PLANNED PARENTHOOD Case No. 3:16-CV-00236 (WHO) 19 FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., et al., 20 Hon. William H. Orrick III Plaintiff, 21 vs. Defendant David Daleiden’s 22 Motion for Summary Judgment 23 THE CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, et al., Hearing Date: July 17, 2019, 2:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Anselm & Becket
    Anselm & Becket Two Canterbury Saints’ Lives by JOHN OF SALISBURY John of Salisbury (d. 1180), a scholar, author and diplomat, was numbered among the eruditi, the learned clerks in service to Theobald and to Thomas Becket, successive archbishops of Can- terbury. Indeed, John was a member of Becket’s household and present in the cathedral when the archbishop’s infamous murder occurred, albeit from a rather ignominious position, concealed in the shadows of the darkening church. Within two years of that fateful event, John composed a brief Life of his friend, the martyr. This would be his second biography of a saint. The first was written at the behest of Archbishop Thomas Becket early in 1163 for inclusion in the dossier presented to Pope Alexander III at the Council of Tours petitioning the pope to canonize Anselm (1033– 1109), a former archbishop of Canterbury. Although neither of these biographies has secured the universal acclaim that modern scholars have bestowed on John of Salisbury’s other writings, both certainly warrant scholarly attention. This translation of the Lives of Anselm and Becket finally makes available in English all the known writings of John of Salisbury. These two works are his only contributions to the genres of biography and hagiography. In them we see how this notable Christian humanist employed his considerable rhetorical skills to create lasting literary memorials to figures of great importance in English ecclesiastical history. His profound concern for the free- dom of the Church, his loathing of tyrants and tyrannical behavior, his affection for the classics and Sacred Scripture, are themes woven into his accounts of the lives and activities of two arch- bishops of Canterbury who endured indignity and exile for the sake of Church liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • All SS Individual Windows.Pub
    THE MEDIEVAL STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS OF ALL SAINTS NORTH STREET, YORK WINDOW 1 15TH-CENTURY COATS OF ARMS These shields were originally in the East window of the Lady Chapel (window 5), where some of them are believed to be connected with the VISIONS OF OUR LADY received in All Saints by the anchoress Emma Raughton in 1421. In particular the shield at bottom right, containing six pears, belongs to the Beachamp family. In the visions Our Lady instructed that Richard Beachamp, Earl of Warwick, was to have care of the as-yet- unborn infant son of King Henry V, whose death was also foretold (he died on campaign in France in 1422). The son was to be crowned as King Henry VI in England and also in France (he was) and was to be educated by Beauchamp (he was). In the top of each of the three lights is an exuberant architectural fantasy known as a ‘canopy’. Similar canopies can be seen in many of the windows in All Saints. These canopies originally went with a different, now unknown, window. 10 1 2 9 3 8 4 5 6 7 THE MEDIEVAL STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS OF ALL SAINTS NORTH STREET, YORK WINDOW 2 The S. Thomas Window (c. 1410) In the left light is S. Thomas the Apostle, known as ‘Doubting Thomas’ because according to S. John’s Gospel he refused to believe in the resurrection of Christ until he saw and touched him. The scroll behind his head reads ‘Dominus meus et Deus meus’, ‘My Lord and my God’, Thomas’s confession of faith when the risen Christ showed himself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cult of St Edmund, King and Martyr, and the Medieval Kings of England
    The Cult of St Edmund, King and Martyr, and the Medieval Kings of England PAUL WEBSTER Cardiff University Abstract Two notable late-medieval images depicting St Edmund King and Martyr, or his shrine, associate his cult with prayers and intercession for the king. In Lydgate’s illustrated verse life of the saint, Henry VI is shown kneeling before the shrine, while on the Wilton Diptych, Edmund is one of three saints presenting Richard II to the Virgin Mary. This article explores royal devotion to Edmund, examining efforts of kings to sustain a religious aura linked to saintly predecessors. The article considers evidence for royal visits to Bury St Edmunds abbey and gift-giving in honour of the saint. Rulers from the eleventh century onwards venerated Edmund, including Edward the Confessor (himself later canonised). Twelfth- and thirteenth-century royal pilgrimages combined visits to shrines at Westminster, Canterbury, Bury and East Anglian holy sites. Henry III named his second son in honour of the saint. Meanwhile, Edmund’s banner was carried, and gifts made in intercession or thanks, for success in battle. Despite emerging interest in the martial cult of St George, kingly giving in honour of Edmund continued in the fourteenth century, with the saint honoured alongside others, notably the Confessor and Becket. This combined devotion, it is argued, was the predominant way in which kings of England invoked the saints. St Edmund’s importance in kingly religious activity linked sanctified kingship with appeals to the attributes of a range of saints. urdered by the Danes in 869 and swiftly accorded popular veneration as a saint, Edmund, king of East Anglia from 855 M to 869, became the focus of a cult to which devotion was established in the tenth and eleventh centuries, and then sustained across the Middle Ages.1 In particular, the martyred saint attracted the attention of successive generations of the rulers of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Becket and Clerical Immunity Erika Zabinski University of St
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of St. Thomas, Minnesota University of St. Thomas, Minnesota UST Research Online School of Divinity Master’s Theses and Projects Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity Winter 12-2015 Thomas Becket and Clerical Immunity Erika Zabinski University of St. Thomas, Minnesota, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/sod_mat Part of the Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Zabinski, Erika, "Thomas Becket and Clerical Immunity" (2015). School of Divinity Master’s Theses and Projects. 12. https://ir.stthomas.edu/sod_mat/12 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity at UST Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Divinity Master’s Theses and Projects by an authorized administrator of UST Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SAINT PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS Thomas Becket and Clerical Immunity A THESIS Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Divinity of the University of St. Thomas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Theology © Copyright All Rights Reserved by Erika Zabinski St. Paul, MN 2015 1 I. Introduction We hear much more about the heroism of St. Thomas Becket, the martyr-archbishop of Canterbury, than we hear about the cause for which he made his stand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tradition of the Red Mass Was Begun by Pope Innocent IV in 1243
    Mass with Bishop Timothy L. Doherty followed by a dinner for legal professionals and a presentation by Notre Dame Law Professor Richard W. Garnett The tradition of the Red Mass was begun by Pope Innocent IV in 1243 for the Ecclesial Judical Court asking the invocation of the Holy Spirit as a source of wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude and strength for the coming term of the court. The color red signifies the Holy Spirit and martyrdom. St. Thomas More is the patron saint of lawyers. The Diocese of Lafayette-in-Indiana will celebrate the fifth annual Red Mass on Monday, October 5, 2020, at the Cathedral of St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception in Lafayette at 5:30 pm. All government officials (federal, state, local levels, executive, legislative, judicial branches), attorneys, paralegals, law students and their spouses are cordially invited to attend. One does not have to be Catholic to join us in prayer and fellowship for the legal community. The Red Mass is a tradition in the Catholic Church which dates back to the 13th century. The first Red Mass is believed to have been celebrated in the Cathedral of Paris in 1245, and thereafter the tradition spread throughout Europe. A Red Mass was initially celebrated to mark the beginning of the annual term of the courts but can be held at other times. The word “red” was originally used to describe the Mass in 1310, because the justices of the English Supreme Court wore scarlet robes. Over time the “Red” Mass came to have a deeper theological meaning, with red symbolizing the “tongues of fire” that descended upon the Apostles at Pentecost bestowing the gifts of the Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Thomas Becket 1321 North Burning Bush Lane • Mt
    July 12, 2020—15th Sunday in Ordinary Time St. Thomas Becket 1321 North Burning Bush Lane • Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 PJG PG`7 N_,7 847- 827-9220 PJG E-_JY: [email protected] PJG +7,J7: www.shomasbecketmp.org PJG OAAJ-7 H Monday— Friday 8:00am - 1:00pm Saturday & Sunday - closed Find us on fb FACEBOOK! MASS TIMES Saturday: 4pm Sunday: 9:00am & 12:30pm 7:30am & 10:45am in Polish Weekdays: 9am Mass: Monday - Friday Friday - 7pm Mass in Polish CONFESSIONS Please check our webpage for mes and sign up: shomasbecketmp.org PARISH STAFF Business Director: Patrick Reynolds [email protected] BAPTISMS & WEDDINGS Please call the parish office Pastor: Rev. Chris Kulig Music Director: Paula Kowalkowski to make arrangements. [email protected] [email protected] (847) 298-5450 Pastor Emeritus: Rev. John Roller Administrave Assistant: PARISHIONERS When moving in or out of Deacon Couple: Krystyna Maciorowski [email protected] the parish, please nofy the Tony and Doreen Jannoa: (847) 690-9970 [email protected] Faith Formaon Coordinator: parish office. Renata Sosin: (847) 296-9051 Office Manager/Bullen Editor: [email protected] Liz Mika: [email protected] Maintenance: Mariusz Klimek Page 2 Welcome to St. Thomas Becket 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time Special Sacrament No maer who I ask about their First Communion, young or older, people have always something to share about it. The First Communion seems to be this special sacrament for everyone. Some remember the gi s they get and having family around, others explain the dress or suit and feeling fancy and some acknowledge the nice and warm feeling of receiving the Host for the first me.
    [Show full text]
  • 162286 01 02 Brief
    RECEIVED by MSC 11/26/2020 2:44:13 AM STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE SUPREME COURT _________________ ANGELIC JOHNSON, et al. Supreme Court Case No. _______ Petitioners, PETITIONERS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT v OF PETITION FOR WRITS JOCELYN BENSON, et al., Respondents. IMMEDIATE RELIEF REQUESTED BEFORE DECEMBER 8, 2020 SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR THOMAS MORE SOCIETY— AMISTAD PROJECT Ian A. Northon, Esq. (P65082) Erin Elizabeth Mersino, Esq. (P70886) Gregory G. Timmer (P39396) GREAT LAKES JUSTICE CENTER* RHOADES MCKEE, PC* 5600 W. Mt. Hope Highway 55 Campau Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48917 Suite 300 (517) 322-3207 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 [email protected] Tel.: (616) 233-5125 Fax: (616) 233-5269 *for identification purposes only [email protected] COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS [email protected] Robert J. Muise, Esq. (P62849) AMERICAN FREEDOM LAW CENTER* PO Box 131098 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113 Tel: (734) 635-3756 Fax: (801) 760-3901 [email protected] THIS ORIGINAL PROCEEDING INVOLVES A RULING THAT A PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION, A STATUTE, RULE OR REGULATION, OR OTHER STATE GOVERNMENTAL ACTION IS INVALID RECEIVED by MSC 11/26/2020 2:44:13 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES.......................................................................................................... iv STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION............................................................................................ viii STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE DECISION FROM WHICH THIS PETITION ARISES AND ITS DATE OF ENTRY ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ¨§¦94 ¨§¦35 ¨§¦35
    ST70 Catholic Services Appeal Foundation ST107 Student Recipients High School Reward Recipients per Parish per Parish 0 School Year 2015-2016 1 - 3 4 - 5 ST35 6 - 8 169 ¤£ ST65 9 - 11 ¦¨§35 ST95 ST23 g Catholic High Schools ¤£8 Parish Boundaries ¦¨§94 ST55 63 St. Stephen ¤£ ¤£10 3 St Genevieve St Timothy St Joseph 4 4 4 St Gerard 64 St Vincent de Paul Majella ST64 ST St Thomas 3 8 Totino-Grace St Mary of the Lake St Michael ST35 3 St John 3 St William 2 12 55 Providence the Baptist £ ST St. Anne Academy 2 g ¤ 3 St Odilia 1 4 g Hill-Murray Holy Name of Jesus De La Salle St Charles 1 g Guardian 1 gCristo Rey Angels Saint Agnes Benilde-St. Margaret's Jesuit g 5 St. Boniface g g Cretin-Derham Hall 1 St. Francis of 7 7 g Assisi ST ST St Ambrose Holy Family Academy of Visitation 2 2 St Joseph gHoly Angels St. Thomas Academy St Victoria St Hubert gg 2 g St Edward St Patrick 2 4 3 Nativity St Thomas 2 St Rita Guardian Angels Becket 3 St John St Thomas 2 3 1 St Bernard Neumann 1 £212 St Mary St John the Baptist 4 10 ¤ 1 4 2 ¤£ St Michael Risen Savior 2 2 ST13 ¤£52 ST25 ST5 ¤£61 Annunciation 1 St Pius 2 ST3 ST58 ST13 ¦¨§35 Bethlehem Academy ST60 g ¤£52 Divine Mercy 11 ¤£63 ¤£14 ST60 RRaammsseeyy AAnnddoovveerr HHaamm LLaakkee 35 Catholic Services Appeal Foundation A n o k a ¦¨§ Student Recipients 101 ST per Parish High School StudentS t.R Steephwen ard Recipients per PCaoriusnhtt y ST101 3 0 DDaayyttoonn AAnnookkaa ¤£10 ScRo ghers ool Year 2015-2016 1 - 3 Ro g ers ¤£61 49 65 LLiinnoo LLaakkeessST St Genevieve 4 - 5 CCoooonn RRaappiiddss ST CChhaammpplliinn
    [Show full text]