DOCSLIB.ORG

This Is Only a Guide of Animals That MAY Be Legal in a State. Due to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Is Only a Guide of Animals That MAY Be Legal in a State. Due to The VERMONT LEGAL PET GUIDE POSSESS IMPORT TAKE COMMENTS This is only a guide of animals that MAY be legal in a state. Due to the extensive amount of laws involved that are constantly changing, UAPPEAL cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. Users are responsible for checking all laws BEFORE getting an animal. Legal as Pets as Legal Permit VFWD Pets for Legal Permit VFWD Permit Ag Pets for Legal ARACHNID, CENTIPEDE, MILLIPEDE Scorpion, Bark No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Scorpion, Fattail (Androctonus, No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Parabuthus, Buthacus, Buthus, Compsobuthus, Hottentota, Mesobuthus, Odontobuthus) Scorpion, Five Keeled Gold No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Scorpion (Hemiscorpius) No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Scorpion, Yellow Legged Burrowing No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Australian Funnel-Web (Atrax) No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Funnel-Web No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Hobo No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Hunting No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Mouse No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Recluse No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Wandering (Armed) No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Widow No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Spider, Yellow-sac No No NA Exception to Unrestricted - No pets Unlisted Yes No Yes No No NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Import - See Ag BATS All No No NA Restricted animal - No pets BEARS All No No NA Restricted animal - No pets BIRDS Budgerigar Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Buzzard, European (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Canary, Common (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Cockatiel Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit VERMONT LEGAL PET GUIDE POSSESS IMPORT TAKE COMMENTS This is only a guide of animals that MAY be legal in a state. Due to the extensive amount of laws involved that are constantly changing, UAPPEAL cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. Users are responsible for checking all laws BEFORE getting an animal. Legal as Pets as Legal Permit VFWD Pets for Legal Permit VFWD Permit Ag Pets for Legal Conure, Jenday (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Duck, Muscovy (domestic varieties) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Emu Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Black-throated (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Chestnut-breasted (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Double-barred (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Gouldian (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Masked (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Painted (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Pictorella (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Plum-headed (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Society (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Star (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Finch, Zebra (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Goose, Egyptian (domestic varieties) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Goose, Greylag (domestic varieties) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit including: Emden Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Gray African Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Pilgrim Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Sebastopol Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Toulouse Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Goose, Swan (domestic varieties) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit including: African Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Chinese Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Grassfinch, Long-tailed (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Unrestricted animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Guineafowl, Helmeted (domestic Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit varieties) Junglefowl, Red (domestic chicken Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit varieties) VERMONT LEGAL PET GUIDE POSSESS IMPORT TAKE COMMENTS This is only a guide of animals that MAY be legal in a state. Due to the extensive amount of laws involved that are constantly changing, UAPPEAL cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. Users are responsible for checking all laws BEFORE getting an animal. Legal as Pets as Legal Permit VFWD Pets for Legal Permit VFWD Permit Ag Pets for Legal Lorikeet, Scaly-breasted (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Lovebird, Masked (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Lovebird, Peach-faced (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Mallard (domestic varieties) including: Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Aylesbury Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Blue Swedish Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Buff Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Cayuga Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Crested White Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit English Call Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Indian Runner Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Pekin Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Roen Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Mallard (captive-bred w/federal mark) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Ostrich Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parakeet, Alexandrine (blue/lutino Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit captive-bred) Parakeet, Indian Ringneck (captive- Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit bred) Parakeet, Lineolated (white/blue/ yellow) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit (captive-bred) Parakeet, Mulga (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parakeet, Red-fronted (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parakeet, Red-rumped (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parakeet, Yellow-fronted (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Partridge, Chukar Yes No Yes No Yes NA Ag Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Blue-winged (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Bourke's (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Elegant (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Mallee Ringneck (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit VERMONT LEGAL PET GUIDE POSSESS IMPORT TAKE COMMENTS This is only a guide of animals that MAY be legal in a state. Due to the extensive amount of laws involved that are constantly changing, UAPPEAL cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. Users are responsible for checking all laws BEFORE getting an animal. Legal as Pets as Legal Permit VFWD Pets for Legal Permit VFWD Permit Ag Pets for Legal Parrot, Princess (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Red-capped (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Regent (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Scarlet-chested (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag Import Permit Parrot, Superb (captive-bred) Yes No Yes No Yes NA Domestic animal - No VFWD permit needed; Ag
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Lates Niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nile Perch (Lates niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – September 2014 Photo: © Biopix: N Sloth 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Schofield (2011): “Much of central, western and eastern Africa: Nile River (below Murchison Falls), as well as the Congo, Niger, Volga, Senegal rivers and lakes Chad and Turkana (Greenwood 1966 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also present in the brackish Lake Mariot near Alexandria, Egypt.” Lates niloticus Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version - 8/14/2012 Status in the United States From Schofield (2011): “Scientists from Texas traveled to Tanzania in 1974-1975 to investigate the introduction potential of Lates spp. into Texas reservoirs (Thompson et al. 1977 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Temperature tolerance and trophic dynamics were studied for three species (L. angustifrons, L. microlepis and L. mariae). Subsequently, several individuals of these three species were shipped to Heart of the Hills Research Station (HOHRS) in Ingram, Texas in 1975 (Rutledge and Lyons 1976 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also in 1975, Nile perch (L. niloticus) were transferred from Lake Turkana, Kenya, to HOHRS. All fishes were held in indoor, closed-circulating systems (Rutledge and Lyons 1976).” “From 1978 to 1985, Lates spp. was released into various Texas reservoirs (Howells and Garrett 1992 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Almost 70,000 Lates spp. larvae were stocked into Victor Braunig (Bexar Co.), Coleto Creek (Goliad Co.) and Fairfield (Freestone Co.) reservoirs between 1978 and 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Bar, Stripe and Spot Development in Sand-Dwelling Cichlids from Lake Malawi
    Hendrick et al. EvoDevo (2019) 10:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-019-0132-7 EvoDevo RESEARCH Open Access Bar, stripe and spot development in sand-dwelling cichlids from Lake Malawi Laura A. Hendrick1, Grace A. Carter1, Erin H. Hilbrands1, Brian P. Heubel1, Thomas F. Schilling2 and Pierre Le Pabic1* Abstract Background: Melanic patterns such as horizontal stripes, vertical bars and spots are common among teleost fshes and often serve roles in camoufage or mimicry. Extensive research in the zebrafsh model has shown that the devel- opment of horizontal stripes depends on complex cellular interactions between melanophores, xanthophores and iri- dophores. Little is known about the development of horizontal stripes in other teleosts, and even less is known about bar or spot development. Here, we compare chromatophore composition and development of stripes, bars and spots in two cichlid species of sand-dwellers from Lake Malawi—Copadichromis azureus and Dimidiochromis compressiceps. Results: (1) In D. compressiceps, stripes are made of dense melanophores underlaid by xanthophores and overlaid by iridophores. Melanophores and xanthophores are either loose or absent in interstripes, and iridophores are dense. In C. azureus, spots and bars are composed of a chromatophore arrangement similar to that of stripes but are separated by interbars where density of melanophores and xanthophores is only slightly lower than in stripes and iridophore density appears slightly greater. (2) Stripe, bar and spot chromatophores appear in the skin at metamorphosis. Stripe melanophores directly diferentiate along horizontal myosepta into the adult pattern. In contrast, bar number and position are dynamic throughout development. As body length increases, new bars appear between old ones or by splitting of old ones through new melanophore appearance, not migration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fish Habitat Partnership
    A Fish Habitat Partnership Strategic Plan for Fish Habitat Conservation in Midwest Glacial Lakes Engbretson Underwater Photography September 30, 2009 This page intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. BACKGROUND 7 II. VALUES OF GLACIAL LAKES 8 III. OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS TO GLACIAL LAKES 9 IV. AN ECOREGIONAL APPROACH 14 V. MULTIPLE INTERESTS WITH COMMON GOALS 23 VI. INVASIVES SPECIES, CLIMATE CHANGE 23 VII. CHALLENGES 25 VIII. INTERIM OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS 26 IX. INTERIM PRIORITY WATERSHEDS 29 LITERATURE CITED 30 APPENDICES I Steering Committee, Contributing Partners and Working Groups 33 II Fish Habitat Conservation Strategies Grouped By Themes 34 III Species of Greatest Conservation Need By Level III Ecoregions 36 Contact Information: Pat Rivers, Midwest Glacial Lakes Project Manager 1601 Minnesota Drive Brainerd, MN 56401 Telephone 218-327-4306 [email protected] www.midwestglaciallakes.org 3 Executive Summary OUR MISSION The mission of the Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership is to work together to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance sustainable fish habitats in glacial lakes of the Midwest for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations. Glacial lakes (lakes formed by glacial activity) are a common feature on the midwestern landscape. From small, productive potholes to the large windswept walleye “factories”, glacial lakes are an integral part of the communities within which they are found and taken collectively are a resource of national importance. Despite this value, lakes are commonly treated more as a commodity rather than a natural resource susceptible to degradation. Often viewed apart from the landscape within which they occupy, human activities on land—and in water—have compromised many of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Land Management Plan
    2009 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (Updated Annual Harvest Plan -2014) Itasca County Land Department 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Itasca County Land Department Acknowledgements This Land Management Plan was produced by Itasca County Land Department employees Garrett Ous, Dave Marshall, Michael Gibbons, Adam Olson, Bob Scheierl, Roger Clark, Kory Cease, Steve Aysta, Tim Stocker, Perry Leone, Wayne Perreault, Blair Carlson, Loren Eide, Bob Rother, Andrew Brown, Del Inkman, Darlene Brown and Meg Muller. Thank you to all the citizens for their sincere input and review during the public involvement process. And thank you to Itasca County Commissioners Lori Dowling, Karen Burthwick, Rusty Eichorn, Catherine McLynn and Mark Mandich for their vision and final approval of this document. Foreword This land management plan is designed for providing vision and direction to guide strategic and operational programs of the Land Department. That vision and direction reflects a long standing connection with local economic, educational and social programs. The Land Department is committed to ensuring that economic benefits and environmental integrity are available to both present and future generations. That will be accomplished through actively managing county land and forests for a balance of benefits to the citizens and for providing them with a sustained supply of quality products and services. The Department will apply quality forestland stewardship practices, employ modern technology and information, and partner with other forest organizations to provide citizens with those quality products and services. ________________________________ Garrett Ous September, 2009 Itasca County Land Commissioner 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 ICLD - LMP Section i., page 1 of 3 Itasca County Land Department Land Management Plan Table of Contents i.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    CICHLIFORMES: Cichlidae (part 3) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 6.0 - 30 April 2021 Order CICHLIFORMES (part 3 of 8) Family CICHLIDAE Cichlids (part 3 of 7) Subfamily Pseudocrenilabrinae African Cichlids (Haplochromis through Konia) Haplochromis Hilgendorf 1888 haplo-, simple, proposed as a subgenus of Chromis with unnotched teeth (i.e., flattened and obliquely truncated teeth of H. obliquidens); Chromis, a name dating to Aristotle, possibly derived from chroemo (to neigh), referring to a drum (Sciaenidae) and its ability to make noise, later expanded to embrace cichlids, damselfishes, dottybacks and wrasses (all perch-like fishes once thought to be related), then beginning to be used in the names of African cichlid genera following Chromis (now Oreochromis) mossambicus Peters 1852 Haplochromis acidens Greenwood 1967 acies, sharp edge or point; dens, teeth, referring to its sharp, needle-like teeth Haplochromis adolphifrederici (Boulenger 1914) in honor explorer Adolf Friederich (1873-1969), Duke of Mecklenburg, leader of the Deutsche Zentral-Afrika Expedition (1907-1908), during which type was collected Haplochromis aelocephalus Greenwood 1959 aiolos, shifting, changing, variable; cephalus, head, referring to wide range of variation in head shape Haplochromis aeneocolor Greenwood 1973 aeneus, brazen, referring to “brassy appearance” or coloration of adult males, a possible double entendre (per Erwin Schraml) referring to both “dull bronze” color exhibited by some specimens and to what
    [Show full text]
  • The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE
    The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE ltd 26 Zennor Road Trade Park, Balham, SW12 0PS Ph: 020 7580 6764 [email protected] PLEASE CALL TO CHECK AVAILABILITY ON DAY Complete Freshwater Livestock (2019) Livebearers Common Name In Stock Y/N Limia melanogaster Y Poecilia latipinna Dalmatian Molly Y Poecilia latipinna Silver Lyre Tail Molly Y Poecilia reticulata Male Guppy Asst Colours Y Poecilia reticulata Red Cap, Cobra, Elephant Ear Guppy Y Poecilia reticulata Female Guppy Y Poecilia sphenops Molly: Black, Canary, Silver, Marble. y Poecilia velifera Sailfin Molly Y Poecilia wingei Endler's Guppy Y Xiphophorus hellerii Swordtail: Pineapple,Red, Green, Black, Lyre Y Xiphophorus hellerii Kohaku Swordtail, Koi, HiFin Xiphophorus maculatus Platy: wagtail,blue,red, sunset, variatus Y Tetras Common Name Aphyocarax paraguayemsis White Tip Tetra Aphyocharax anisitsi Bloodfin Tetra Y Arnoldichthys spilopterus Red Eye Tetra Y Axelrodia riesei Ruby Tetra Bathyaethiops greeni Red Back Congo Tetra Y Boehlkea fredcochui Blue King Tetra Copella meinkeni Spotted Splashing Tetra Crenuchus spilurus Sailfin Characin y Gymnocorymbus ternetzi Black Widow Tetra Y Hasemania nana Silver Tipped Tetra y Hemigrammus erythrozonus Glowlight Tetra y Hemigrammus ocelifer Beacon Tetra y Hemigrammus pulcher Pretty Tetra y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Diamond Back Rummy Nose y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Rummy nose Tetra y Hemigrammus rubrostriatus Hemigrammus vorderwimkieri Platinum Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amandae Ember Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amapaensis Amapa Tetra Y Hyphessobrycon bentosi
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian and Madagascan Cichlids
    FAMILY Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 - cichlids SUBFAMILY Etroplinae Kullander, 1998 - Indian and Madagascan cichlids [=Etroplinae H] GENUS Etroplus Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830 - cichlids [=Chaetolabrus, Microgaster] Species Etroplus canarensis Day, 1877 - Canara pearlspot Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) - green chromide [=caris, meleagris] GENUS Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868 - cichlids [=Lamena] Species Paretroplus dambabe Sparks, 2002 - dambabe cichlid Species Paretroplus damii Bleeker, 1868 - damba Species Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis Sparks, 2008 - Sparks' cichlid Species Paretroplus kieneri Arnoult, 1960 - kotsovato Species Paretroplus lamenabe Sparks, 2008 - big red cichlid Species Paretroplus loisellei Sparks & Schelly, 2011 - Loiselle's cichlid Species Paretroplus maculatus Kiener & Mauge, 1966 - damba mipentina Species Paretroplus maromandia Sparks & Reinthal, 1999 - maromandia cichlid Species Paretroplus menarambo Allgayer, 1996 - pinstripe damba Species Paretroplus nourissati (Allgayer, 1998) - lamena Species Paretroplus petiti Pellegrin, 1929 - kotso Species Paretroplus polyactis Bleeker, 1878 - Bleeker's paretroplus Species Paretroplus tsimoly Stiassny et al., 2001 - tsimoly cichlid GENUS Pseudetroplus Bleeker, in G, 1862 - cichlids Species Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795) - orange chromide [=coruchi] SUBFAMILY Ptychochrominae Sparks, 2004 - Malagasy cichlids [=Ptychochrominae S2002] GENUS Katria Stiassny & Sparks, 2006 - cichlids Species Katria katria (Reinthal & Stiassny, 1997) - Katria cichlid GENUS
    [Show full text]
  • The Complexity of Alternative Splicing of Hagoromo Mrnas Is Increased in an Explosively Speciated Lineage in East African Cichlids
    The complexity of alternative splicing of hagoromo mRNAs is increased in an explosively speciated lineage in East African cichlids Yohey Terai*, Naoko Morikawa*, Koichi Kawakami†, and Norihiro Okada*‡§ *Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan; †Department of Developmental Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan; and ‡Division of Cell Fusion, National Institute of Basic Biology, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585 Aichi, Japan Edited by Tomoko Ohta, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan, and approved August 29, 2003 (received for review May 12, 2003) The adaptive radiation of cichlid fishes in the lakes of East Africa other fish, including cichlids. With insertional mutagenesis, the is a prime example of speciation. The choice of cichlid mates on the zebrafish gene hagoromo (hag) was shown to be responsible for basis of a variety of coloration represents a potential basis for pigment pattern formation (17). Recently, we cloned a cichlid speciation that led to adaptive radiation. Here, we characterize the homolog of hag and showed a correlation between the morpho- cichlid homolog of the zebrafish hagoromo (hag) gene that was logical diversity of the Great Lakes lineage and the evolutionary recently cloned and characterized from a pigmentation mutant. rate of amino acid sequence changes in the hag gene (18). Here Although only one hag mRNA was reported in zebrafish, cichlids we show a correlation between the explosive speciation of express nine different hag mRNAs resulting from alternative splic- cichlids and the complexity of alternative splicing variants of this ing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Systematic Biology of Fossil and Living Bony-Tongue Fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei)
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 16(3): e180031, 2018 Journal homepage: www.scielo.br/ni DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180031 Published online: 11 October 2018 (ISSN 1982-0224) Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Printed: 30 September 2018 (ISSN 1679-6225) Review article A review of the systematic biology of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei) Eric J. Hilton1 and Sébastien Lavoué2,3 The bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha, have been the focus of a great deal of morphological, systematic, and evolutio- nary study, due in part to their basal position among extant teleostean fishes. This group includes the mooneyes (Hiodontidae), knifefishes (Notopteridae), the abu (Gymnarchidae), elephantfishes (Mormyridae), arawanas and pirarucu (Osteoglossidae), and the African butterfly fish (Pantodontidae). This morphologically heterogeneous group also has a long and diverse fossil record, including taxa from all continents and both freshwater and marine deposits. The phylogenetic relationships among most extant osteoglossomorph families are widely agreed upon. However, there is still much to discover about the systematic biology of these fishes, particularly with regard to the phylogenetic affinities of several fossil taxa, within Mormyridae, and the position of Pantodon. In this paper we review the state of knowledge for osteoglossomorph fishes. We first provide an overview of the diversity of Osteoglossomorpha, and then discuss studies of the phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha from both morphological and molecular perspectives, as well as biogeographic analyses of the group. Finally, we offer our perspectives on future needs for research on the systematic biology of Osteoglossomorpha. Keywords: Biogeography, Osteoglossidae, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Taxonomy. Os peixes da Superordem Osteoglossomorpha têm sido foco de inúmeros estudos sobre a morfologia, sistemática e evo- lução, particularmente devido à sua posição basal dentre os peixes teleósteos.
    [Show full text]