DOCSLIB.ORG

Searching Coordination Compounds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Searching Coordination Compounds CAS ONLINEB Available on STN Internationalm The Scientific & Technical Information Network SEARCHING COORDINATION COMPOUNDS December 1986 Chemical Abstracts Service A Division of the American Chemical Society 2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3012 Columbus, OH 43210 Copyright O 1986 American Chemical Society Quoting or copying of material from this publication for educational purposes is encouraged. providing acknowledgment is made of the source of such material. SEARCHING COORDINATION COMPOUNDS prepared by Adrienne W. Kozlowski Professor of Chemistry Central Connecticut State University while on sabbatical leave as a Visiting Educator, Chemical Abstracts Service Table of Contents Topic PKEFACE ............................s.~........................ 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO SEARCHING IN CAS ONLINE ............... 1 What is Substructure Searching? ............................... 1 The Basic Commands .............................................. 2 CHAPTEK 2: INTKOOUCTION TO COORDINATION COPPOUNDS ................ 5 Definitions and Terminology ..................................... 5 Ligand Characteristics.......................................... 6 Metal Characteristics .................................... ... 8 CHAPTEK 3: STKUCTUKING AND REGISTKATION POLICIES FOR COORDINATION COMPOUNDS .............................................11 Policies for Structuring Coordination Compounds ................. Ligands .................................................... Ligand Structures........................................... Metal-Ligand Bonds ........................................... Pi.Donors ...............eo.o.................a............... Hydrogens ....................................o.................. Hydride Ions ................o.oo...................e....e.... Charges ..................................so................... Counter Ions ................................................ Ligands with Negative Charges ............................... The Central Metal Atom ...................................... Structuring Assumptions ....................................... Metal-Metal Bonds ............................................... Carboxylates..............................o.......s..e..ao... Incomplete Structures. ...................................... Policies for Assigning Registry Numbers ......................... 18 Counter Ions .................................................. 19 Geometric Ions ................................................ 19 Optical Isomers .............................................. 20 Different Oxidation States .................................... 20 Isotopes ............................................... 20 Ionized Ligands ........................................... 21 Component Registration.................................. 21 Polymers ...................................................... 21 CHAPTER 4: BUILDING STHUCTUKES - THE BASICS...................... 23 The GRAPH Command............................................... 23 The NODE Comand................................................ The BOND Comand................................................ Examples Using the CKAPIL, NODE, and BOND Commands............... Creating a 6-Coordinate Structure............................. Creating Chelate Riag~.....................................,., Creating Fused Rings as Ligands............................... Creating Clusters............................................. Creating Cyclopentadienyl Ligands............................. Creating Macrocyclic Ligands.................................. The RECALL Command - Using Models to Build Structures........... Recall a Registry Number...................................... Recall and Modify a Structure from the Fragment File.......... Variability in Structures....................................... Variable Donor Atoms and Variable Chelate Backbone............ Defining a Central Metal...................................... Defining Ligand Atolns......................................... CHAPTER 5: ADDING ATTKTHUTES TO STRUCTURES....................... The HCOUNT Comand.............................................. The RSPEC Comand............................................... The CONNECT Command............................................. Using CONNECT to Retrieve Metallocenes........................ Using CONNECT in Ligand Structures............................ Metal llydrides................................................ The NSPEC Comand............................................... Effect of aond Type on Node Specification..................... Effect of Bond Type and Node Specification..,................. System Defaults............................................. Ring or Chain Bonds......................................... Chain Bonds and Ring or Chain Nodes......................... All Bonds in Rings.......................................... One Chelate Ring............................................ One Tridentate Ligand....................................... Ring or Chain Node............................................ Bidentate or Tetradentate Ligands........................... CHAPTER 6: ADL)ING SCREENS TO REFINE YOUR SEARCH .................. 61 Screens That Are Often Useful ................................... 64 Adding Metal Screens When Structure Contains the M Node Symbol 64 Adding Screens that Specify Minimum Numbers of Ring or Chain Bonds ......................................................... 65 Hydrogen Augmented Atom Screens for Ligands ................... 69 Type of Ring Screens ......................................... 71 Pi-Bonding Ligands. Organometallics ......................... 72 Screens Not to Use ......................................... 73 BATCH Searching ................................................. 74 Dividing a Search that Will Not Complete in One Search .......... 74 CIWTER 7: SUMMARY OF GENERAL SEARCH TECHNIQUES .................. 75 Using Ring OK Chain Bond Types .................................. 75 LIsing Single Exact Bond Values .................................. 75 Using Ring or Chain Node Specification .......................... 75 Ring Isolation ............................................... 76 Using Gk Nodes ................................................. 76 Tautomers .......................................................76 Using A (Any Atom) Nodes ........................................ 76 Using the CONNECT Attribute ..................................... 77 Determining the Coordination Number ............................. 77 Using Hydrogen Counts for Hydrides .............................. 77 Attributes and the Gk Node ...................................... 77 Using Charges ................................................. 77 Using Screens ................................................... 78 Interpreting SAMPLE Searches .................................... 78 CASE STUDY 1: TAILORING THE COORDINATION SPHERE .................. 79 All Octahedral Dichloro Complexes of Cobalt ..................... 79 Dichloro Cobalt Complexes of Lower Coordination Number .......... 81 Two Different Halide Ligands ................................. 82 Bridging Halides .............................................. 84 Simple Halides and Halo Comp1.exes of Rhenium .................... 88 CASE STUDY 2: ORGANOMETALLZCS .................................... 93 Metallocenes ............................................... 94 Substituted Cyclopentadienyl Ligands ............................ 96 Noncyclic Polyenes .............................................. 97 Ethylene ...................................................... 98 Pentadiene ...................................................99 Partial Coordination of the Pi System ........................... 100 CASE STUDY 3: CAKBOXYLIC ACIDS ...................................103 Comprehensive Searching......................................... 104 .4l 1 Substances with the Ligand Bonded to the Metal .............. 107 Carboxylate Complexes as Salts - No Bond to Metal ............... 109 Specific Structures .N. 0 Chelates ..............................111 Structures with an Uncoordinated Carboxylate Group .............. 1.13 Structures with an Uncoordinated Pyridine Group ................. 115 CASE STUDY 4: UNSPECIFI!dD DEKXVATZVES ............................ 117 Substances without Registry Numbers .............................117 Manually Registered Compounds ............................... 120 CASE STUDY 5: CHELATES AND MACKOCYCLES ........................... 123 Tridentate Che,,ates............................................. 12'3 Tetradentate Macrocycles with Both Sulfur and Nitrogen Donors ... 127 Macrocyclic Complexes with Varying Numbers of Donor Sites ....... 129 CASE STUDY 6: LIYDRIDES ........................................... 133 CASE STUDY 7: XETAL CLUSTERS .....................................139 Gold Clusters with Phosphine Ligands ........................... 139 Iron Carbonyl Clusters .......................................... 142 Terminal Carbonyl Groups .................................. 142 Bridging Carbonyls ....................................... 147 Clusters of Specific Size..................................... 150 CASE STUDY 8: STEREOCHEMISTKY ....................................155 Geometry ........................................................159 Ligand Stereochemistry ..........................................162 Cis or Trans Iso~ners............................................ 165 CASE STUDY 9: NANE AND FOMULA SEARCrlZNG ........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crystal Structures
    Crystal Structures Academic Resource Center Crystallinity: Repeating or periodic array over large atomic distances. 3-D pattern in which each atom is bonded to its nearest neighbors Crystal structure: the manner in which atoms, ions, or molecules are spatially arranged. Unit cell: small repeating entity of the atomic structure. The basic building block of the crystal structure. It defines the entire crystal structure with the atom positions within. Lattice: 3D array of points coinciding with atom positions (center of spheres) Metallic Crystal Structures FCC (face centered cubic): Atoms are arranged at the corners and center of each cube face of the cell. FCC continued Close packed Plane: On each face of the cube Atoms are assumed to touch along face diagonals. 4 atoms in one unit cell. a 2R 2 BCC: Body Centered Cubic • Atoms are arranged at the corners of the cube with another atom at the cube center. BCC continued • Close Packed Plane cuts the unit cube in half diagonally • 2 atoms in one unit cell 4R a 3 Hexagonal Close Packed (HCP) • Cell of an HCP lattice is visualized as a top and bottom plane of 7 atoms, forming a regular hexagon around a central atom. In between these planes is a half- hexagon of 3 atoms. • There are two lattice parameters in HCP, a and c, representing the basal and height parameters Volume respectively. 6 atoms per unit cell Coordination number – the number of nearest neighbor atoms or ions surrounding an atom or ion. For FCC and HCP systems, the coordination number is 12. For BCC it’s 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Ligand Complexation Reactions On
    Organic ligand complexation reactions on aluminium-bearing mineral surfaces studied via in-situ Multiple Internal Reflection Infrared Spectroscopy, adsorption experiments, and surface complexation modelling A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 2010 Charalambos Assos School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................8 ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................10 DECLARATION.........................................................................................................11 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT....................................................................................12 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................13 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................38 CHAPTER 2 THE USE OF IR SPECTROSCOPY IN THE STUDY OF ORGANIC LIGAND SURFACE COMPLEXATION............................................40 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................40 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structure of a Material Is Way in Which Atoms, Ions, Molecules Are Spatially Arranged in 3-D Space
    Crystalline Structures – The Basics •Crystal structure of a material is way in which atoms, ions, molecules are spatially arranged in 3-D space. •Crystal structure = lattice (unit cell geometry) + basis (atom, ion, or molecule positions placed on lattice points within the unit cell). •A lattice is used in context when describing crystalline structures, means a 3-D array of points in space. Every lattice point must have identical surroundings. •Unit cell: smallest repetitive volume •Each crystal structure is built by stacking which contains the complete lattice unit cells and placing objects (motifs, pattern of a crystal. A unit cell is chosen basis) on the lattice points: to represent the highest level of geometric symmetry of the crystal structure. It’s the basic structural unit or building block of crystal structure. 7 crystal systems in 3-D 14 crystal lattices in 3-D a, b, and c are the lattice constants 1 a, b, g are the interaxial angles Metallic Crystal Structures (the simplest) •Recall, that a) coulombic attraction between delocalized valence electrons and positively charged cores is isotropic (non-directional), b) typically, only one element is present, so all atomic radii are the same, c) nearest neighbor distances tend to be small, and d) electron cloud shields cores from each other. •For these reasons, metallic bonding leads to close packed, dense crystal structures that maximize space filling and coordination number (number of nearest neighbors). •Most elemental metals crystallize in the FCC (face-centered cubic), BCC (body-centered cubic, or HCP (hexagonal close packed) structures: Room temperature crystal structure Crystal structure just before it melts 2 Recall: Simple Cubic (SC) Structure • Rare due to low packing density (only a-Po has this structure) • Close-packed directions are cube edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Field Theory (CFT)
    Crystal Field Theory (CFT) The bonding of transition metal complexes can be explained by two approaches: crystal field theory and molecular orbital theory. Molecular orbital theory takes a covalent approach, and considers the overlap of d-orbitals with orbitals on the ligands to form molecular orbitals; this is not covered on this site. Crystal field theory takes the ionic approach and considers the ligands as point charges around a central metal positive ion, ignoring any covalent interactions. The negative charge on the ligands is repelled by electrons in the d-orbitals of the metal. The orientation of the d orbitals with respect to the ligands around the central metal ion is important, and can be used to explain why the five d-orbitals are not degenerate (= at the same energy). Whether the d orbitals point along or in between the cartesian axes determines how the orbitals are split into groups of different energies. Why is it required? The valence bond approach could not explain the Electronic spectra, Magnetic moments, Reaction mechanisms of the complexes. Assumptions of CFT: 1. The central Metal cation is surrounded by ligand which contain one or more lone pair of electrons. 2. The ionic ligand (F-, Cl- etc.) are regarded as point charges and neutral molecules (H2O, NH3 etc.) as point dipoles. 3. The electrons of ligand does not enter metal orbital. Thus there is no orbital overlap takes place. 4. The bonding between metal and ligand is purely electrostatic i.e. only ionic interaction. The approach taken uses classical potential energy equations that take into account the attractive and repulsive interactions between charged particles (that is, Coulomb's Law interactions).
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrahedral Coordination with Lone Pairs
    TETRAHEDRAL COORDINATION WITH LONE PAIRS In the examples we have discussed so far, the shape of the molecule is defined by the coordination geometry; thus the carbon in methane is tetrahedrally coordinated, and there is a hydrogen at each corner of the tetrahedron, so the molecular shape is also tetrahedral. It is common practice to represent bonding patterns by "generic" formulas such as AX4, AX2E2, etc., in which "X" stands for bonding pairs and "E" denotes lone pairs. (This convention is known as the "AXE method") The bonding geometry will not be tetrahedral when the valence shell of the central atom contains nonbonding electrons, however. The reason is that the nonbonding electrons are also in orbitals that occupy space and repel the other orbitals. This means that in figuring the coordination number around the central atom, we must count both the bonded atoms and the nonbonding pairs. The water molecule: AX2E2 In the water molecule, the central atom is O, and the Lewis electron dot formula predicts that there will be two pairs of nonbonding electrons. The oxygen atom will therefore be tetrahedrally coordinated, meaning that it sits at the center of the tetrahedron as shown below. Two of the coordination positions are occupied by the shared electron-pairs that constitute the O–H bonds, and the other two by the non-bonding pairs. Thus although the oxygen atom is tetrahedrally coordinated, the bonding geometry (shape) of the H2O molecule is described as bent. There is an important difference between bonding and non-bonding electron orbitals. Because a nonbonding orbital has no atomic nucleus at its far end to draw the electron cloud toward it, the charge in such an orbital will be concentrated closer to the central atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Studies of Three Chemical Systems
    Computational Studies of Three Chemical Systems _______________________________________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by Haunani Thomas Prof. Carol A. Deakyne, Dissertation Supervisor December 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES OF THREE CHEMICAL SYSTEMS Presented by Haunani Thomas, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy of Chemistry, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Carol Deakyne (Chair) Professor John Adams (Member) Professor Michael Greenlief (Member) Professor Giovanni Vignale (Outside Member) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am forever indebted to my dissertation supervisor, Professor Carol Deakyne, for her guidance and support. She has been an excellent and patient mentor through the graduate school process, always mindful of the practical necessities of my progress, introducing me to the field of Chemistry, and allowing me to advance professionally through attendance and presentations at ACS meetings. I am fully aware that, in this respect, not all graduate students are as fortunate as I have been. I am also grateful to Professor John Adams for all his support and teaching throughout my graduate career. I am appreciative of my entire committee, Professor Deakyne, Professor Adams, Professor Michael Greenlief, and Professor Giovanni Vignale, for their sound advice, patience, and flexibility. I would also like to thank my experimental collaborators and their groups, Professor Joel Liebman of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Professor Michael Van Stip Donk of Wichita State University, and Professor Jerry Atwood of the University of Missouri – Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxide Crystal Structures: the Basics
    Oxide crystal structures: The basics Ram Seshadri Materials Department and Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106 USA [email protected] Originally created for the: ICMR mini-School at UCSB: Computational tools for functional oxide materials – An introduction for experimentalists This lecture 1. Brief description of oxide crystal structures (simple and complex) a. Ionic radii and Pauling’s rules b. Electrostatic valence c. Bond valence, and bond valence sums Why do certain combinations of atoms take on specific structures? My bookshelf H. D. Megaw O. Muller & R. Roy I. D. Brown B. G. Hyde & S. Andersson Software: ICSD + VESTA K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Cryst. 44 (2011) 1272–1276. [doi:10.1107/S0021889811038970] Crystal structures of simple oxides [containing a single cation site] Crystal structures of simple oxides [containing a single cation site] N.B.: CoO is simple, Co3O4 is not. ZnCo2O4 is certainly not ! Co3O4 and ZnCo2O4 are complex oxides. Graphs of connectivity in crystals: Atoms are nodes and edges (the lines that connect nodes) indicate short (near-neighbor) distances. CO2: The molecular structure is O=C=O. The graph is: Each C connected to 2 O, each O connected to a 1 C OsO4: The structure comprises isolated tetrahedra (molecular). The graph is below: Each Os connected to 4 O and each O to 1 Os Crystal structures of simple oxides of monovalent ions: A2O Cu2O Linear coordination is unusual. Found usually in Cu+ and Ag+.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplay Between Gating and Block of Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
    brain sciences Review Interplay between Gating and Block of Ligand-Gated Ion Channels Matthew B. Phillips 1,2, Aparna Nigam 1 and Jon W. Johnson 1,2,* 1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; [email protected] (M.B.P.); [email protected] (A.N.) 2 Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(412)-624-4295 Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Drugs that inhibit ion channel function by binding in the channel and preventing current flow, known as channel blockers, can be used as powerful tools for analysis of channel properties. Channel blockers are used to probe both the sophisticated structure and basic biophysical properties of ion channels. Gating, the mechanism that controls the opening and closing of ion channels, can be profoundly influenced by channel blocking drugs. Channel block and gating are reciprocally connected; gating controls access of channel blockers to their binding sites, and channel-blocking drugs can have profound and diverse effects on the rates of gating transitions and on the stability of channel open and closed states. This review synthesizes knowledge of the inherent intertwining of block and gating of excitatory ligand-gated ion channels, with a focus on the utility of channel blockers as analytic probes of ionotropic glutamate receptor channel function. Keywords: ligand-gated ion channel; channel block; channel gating; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; ionotropic glutamate receptor; AMPA receptor; kainate receptor; NMDA receptor 1. Introduction Neuronal information processing depends on the distribution and properties of the ion channels found in neuronal membranes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 D-Metal Organometalloc Chemistry
    Chapter 21 d-metal organometalloc chemistry Bonding Ligands Compounds Reactions Chapter 13 Organometallic Chemistry 13-1 Historical Background 13-2 Organic Ligands and Nomenclature 13-3 The 18-Electron Rule 13-4 Ligands in Organometallic Chemistry 13-5 Bonding Between Metal Atoms and Organic π Systems 13-6 Complexes Containing M-C, M=C, and M≡C Bonds 13-7 Spectral Analysis and Characterization of Organometallic Complexes “Inorganic Chemistry” Third Ed. Gary L. Miessler, Donald A. Tarr, 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expedia 13-1 Historical Background Sandwich compounds Cluster compounds 13-1 Historical Background Other examples of organometallic compounds 13-1 Historical Background Organometallic Compound Organometallic chemistry is the study of chemical compounds containing bonds between carbon and a metal. Organometallic chemistry combines aspects of inorganic chemistry and organic chemistry. Organometallic compounds find practical use in stoichiometric and catalytically active compounds. Electron counting is key in understanding organometallic chemistry. The 18-electron rule is helpful in predicting the stabilities of organometallic compounds. Organometallic compounds which have 18 electrons (filled s, p, and d orbitals) are relatively stable. This suggests the compound is isolable, but it can result in the compound being inert. 13-1 Historical Background In attempt to synthesize fulvalene Produced an orange solid (ferrocene) Discovery of ferrocene began the era of modern organometallic chemistry. Staggered
    [Show full text]
  • Inorganic Chemistry
    Inorganic Chemistry Chemistry 120 Fall 2005 Prof. Seth Cohen Some Important Features of Metal Ions Electronic configuration • Oxidation State/Charge. •Size. • Coordination number. • Coordination geometry. • “Soft vs. Hard”. • Lability. • Electrochemistry. • Ligand environment. 1 Oxidation State/Charge • The oxidation state describes the charge on the metal center and number of valence electrons • Group - Oxidation Number = d electron count 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Size • Size of the metal ions follows periodic trends. • Higher positive charge generally means a smaller ion. • Higher on the periodic table means a smaller ion. • Ions of the same charge decrease in radius going across a row, e.g. Ca2+>Mn2+>Zn2+. • Of course, ion size will effect coordination number. 2 Coordination Number • Coordination Number = the number of donor atoms bound to the metal center. • The coordination number may or may not be equal to the number of ligands bound to the metal. • Different metal ions, depending on oxidation state prefer different coordination numbers. • Ligand size and electronic structure can also effect coordination number. Common Coordination Numbers • Low coordination numbers (n =2,3) are fairly rare, in biological systems a few examples are Cu(I) metallochaperones and Hg(II) metalloregulatory proteins. • Four-coordinate is fairly common in complexes of Cu(I/II), Zn(II), Co(II), as well as in biologically less relevant metal ions such as Pd(II) and Pt(II). • Five-coordinate is also fairly common, particularly for Fe(II). • Six-coordinate is the most common and important coordination number for most transition metal ions. • Higher coordination numbers are found in some 2nd and 3rd row transition metals, larger alkali metals, and lanthanides and actinides.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of the VSEPR Model R.J
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Coordination Chemistry Reviews 252 (2008) 1315–1327 Review Fifty years of the VSEPR model R.J. Gillespie Department of Chemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. L8S 4M1, Canada Received 26 April 2007; accepted 21 July 2007 Available online 27 July 2007 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1315 2. The VSEPR model ..................................................................................................... 1316 3. Force constants and the VSEPR model ................................................................................... 1318 4. Linnett’s double quartet model .......................................................................................... 1318 5. Exceptions to the VSEPR model, ligand–ligand repulsion and the ligand close packing (LCP) model ........................... 1318 6. Analysis of the electron density.......................................................................................... 1321 7. Molecules of the transition metals ....................................................................................... 1325 8. Teaching the VSEPR model ............................................................................................. 1326 9. Summary and conclusions .............................................................................................. 1326 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Way for Probing Bond Strength J
    A New Way for Probing Bond Strength J. Klein, H. Khartabil, J.C. Boisson, J. Contreras-Garcia, Jean-Philip Piquemal, E. Henon To cite this version: J. Klein, H. Khartabil, J.C. Boisson, J. Contreras-Garcia, Jean-Philip Piquemal, et al.. A New Way for Probing Bond Strength. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, American Chemical Society, 2020, 124 (9), pp.1850-1860. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09845. hal-02377737 HAL Id: hal-02377737 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02377737 Submitted on 27 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A New Way for Probing Bond Strength Johanna Klein,y Hassan Khartabil,y Jean-Charles Boisson,z Julia Contreras-Garc´ıa,{ Jean-Philip Piquemal,{ and Eric H´enon∗,y yInstitut de Chimie Mol´eculaire de Reims UMR CNRS 7312, Universit´ede Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la Housse 51687 Reims Cedex 02 BP39 (France) zCReSTIC EA 3804, Universit´ede Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la Housse 51687 Reims Cedex 02 BP39 (France) {Sorbonne Universit´es,UPMC, Laboratoire de Chimie Th´eoriqueand UMR CNRS 7616, 4 Pl Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05(France) E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +33(3)26918497 1 Abstract The covalent chemical bond is intimately linked to electron sharing between atoms.
    [Show full text]