DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2016 The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple Stuart W. Adams Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Adams, Stuart W., "The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple" (2016). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 5075. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5075 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF ROOTSTOCK, SCION, GRAFTING METHOD AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE OF APPLE by Stuart W. Adams A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Plant Science Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Brent Black, Ph.D. Bruce Bugbee, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Gennaro Fazio, Ph.D. Mark McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Stuart Adams 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple by Stuart W. Adams, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Brent Black Department: Plants, Soils and Climate The apple rootstock ‘Geneva® 41’ (‘G.41’), is desirable for its resistance to fire blight, Erwinia amylovora, while producing high yields. However, ‘G.41’ and other Geneva® selections tend to form weak graft unions in the nursery that are susceptible to breaking in the wind, at harvest, or during shipment. In order to understand and remedy this graft union weakness, six scions (‘Fuji’, ‘Gala’, ‘Honeycrisp’, ‘McIntosh’, ‘Pink Lady’, and ‘Scilate’) by seven rootstocks (‘G.41’, ‘G.935’, ‘G.214’, ‘G.11’, ‘M.9-NIC 29’, ‘B.9’ and ‘EMLA 26’), by two grafting methods (chip bud and saddle graft) in a factorial design were tested for graft union flexural strength and flexibility. Additionally, plant growth regulators (PGR) were applied to trees with ‘G.41’ as rootstock as a solution to overcome graft union weakness. Transpiration rate and hydraulic resistance were measured for comparison of a weak graft forming rootstock (‘G.41’) to a strong graft forming rootstock (‘M.9-NIC 29’). ‘G.41’ consistently formed a weaker graft union iv regardless of scion or grafting method. Scions such as ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Pink Lady’ formed stronger graft unions, while ‘Scilate’ and ‘Honeycrisp’ form weaker graft unions. Saddle grafting did not improve graft union strength. Nurseries that graft on ‘G.41’ should choose scions that form stronger graft unions. Benzyl adenine (BA) in a latex paint increased the strength and flexibility of the graft union relative to scion cross sectional area (SCSA), but further research is needs to identify more efficient methods of application. Rootstock effect on transpiration rate was different between years. No detectable differences were found for hydraulic resistance through the graft union of different rootstocks, suggesting weaker graft unions did not limit hydraulic conductance or transpiration rate. Thus graft union weakness is not an indicator of poor vascular connection. (172 pages) v PUBLIC ABSTRACT The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple Stuart W. Adams Fruit trees are always produced through grafting, which unites two genetically distinct plant parts at a graft union to make a complete tree. The two parts are termed the scion (fruiting system) and rootstock (root system). Some rootstock cultivars tend to form weaker graft unions that are susceptible to breaking due to wind, harvest or shipment of finished trees. Some Geneva® apple rootstocks, especially ‘Geneva® 41’ (‘G.41’), form weak graft unions leading to large losses to commercial nurseries. In an effort to understand and possibly remedy the problem, flexural strength was determined for the graft unions of weak graft forming rootstock compared to other rootstock in a factorial study of six scion cultivars grafted onto seven rootstock cultivars using two grafting techniques (chip bud and saddle graft). Additionally, trees grown on ‘G.41’ rootstock received applications of plant growth regulators (PGR) in a spray over the leaves, and as a latex paint application directly on the graft union. PGR treated trees were tested for changes in growth and graft union strength. Transpiration rate and hydraulic resistance were used on a sub-sample to see if a weaker graft union (‘G.41’) was correlated with less water flow through the graft. vi ‘G.41’ consistently formed weaker graft unions regardless of what scion, or grafting technique was used. Scion cultivars, such as ‘McIntosh’, formed stronger unions, while ‘Scilate’ formed weaker unions. Saddle grafting did not improve the graft union strength over chip budding and is thus not a justified remedy for graft union weakness. Benzyl adenine (BA) in a latex paint and prohexadione-calcium (PCa) both increased the strength of the graft union relative to scion cross-sectional area (SCSA). However, further research is needed to find efficient application methods for BA. The rootstock effect on transpiration rate were opposite between trial years. Hydraulic resistance testing yielded no detectable difference between rootstocks for graft resistance. These suggest that weaker graft unions were not correlated with reduced flow and transpiration rate. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Willow Drive Nursery first for making this research possible through the donations of several thousand trees. I would also like to thank the Utah Agriculture Experiment Station, Cornell University in connection with the United States Department of Agriculture and the International Fruit Tree Association for funding this project. I would also like to thank Terrence Robinson in providing the original idea and protocol for this research project. I would especially like to thank my committee members, Drs. Brent Black, Gennaro Fazio and Bruce Bugbee, for their support and assistance throughout the process. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Nick Roberts for his assistance with flexural strength testing in the engineering lab, and James Frisby for his help in the greenhouse. I give special thanks to my family, especially my dear wife, Angelica, who has supported and assisted me in all stages of the research. I dedicate this work to her and our daughter Eva. Stuart W. Adams viii CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... iii PUBLIC ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ..............................................................................................................x LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ xiii CHAPTER I. LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1 Graft Formation ......................................................................................................2 Graft Incompatibility ..............................................................................................8 Wood Formation ...................................................................................................14 Measuring Incompatibility ....................................................................................16 Remediation for Improved Graft Formation .........................................................26 Conclusion ............................................................................................................34 Literature Cited .....................................................................................................36 II. THE EFFECT OF ROOTSTOCK, SCION, AND GRAFT METHOD ON THE GRAFT UNION FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND RIGIDITY OF APPLE ...........................................................................................................42 Abstract ..................................................................................................................42 Introduction ...........................................................................................................43 Materials and Methods ..........................................................................................46 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................51 Conclusion ............................................................................................................60
Recommended publications
  • Using and Breeding Drought Tolerant Grape Rootstocks

    Using and Breeding Drought Tolerant Grape Rootstocks

    Using and Breeding Drought Tolerant Grape Rootstocks Andy Walker [email protected] Acknowledgements • California Grape Rootstock Improvement Commission / California Grape Rootstock Research Foundation • CDFA NT, FT, GV Improvement Advisory Board • California Table Grape Commission • American Vineyard Foundation • E&J Gallo Winery • Louis P. Martini Endowed Chair in Viticulture Thanks! Summaira Riaz, Nina Romero Kevin Fort – Post-doc Claire Heinitz, Jake Uretzky, Inez Hugalde, Cassie Bullock – PhD students Andrew McElrone, USDA-ARS Rootstock Origin • First developed to address grape phylloxera in the late 1800s • French scientists came to the US to collect Vitis species resistant to phylloxera • Took back cuttings of many, but only V. riparia and V. rupestris rooted well from dormant cuttings • Later added V. berlandieri for lime tolerance V. riparia Missouri River V. rupestris Jack Fork River, MO V. berlandieri Fredericksburg, TX V. monticola V. candicans “Isn’t there a cactus gene out there that might help?” Breeding Rootstocks to Tolerate Drought • The ability to continue growth when exposed to water stress • The ability to maintain crop yield with less water • Adaptation vs. resistance • Root architecture – shallow to deep rooting angles • Root density – two tiered to even distributions • Fine root recovery after drought • Structural roots – which persist? • Hydraulic lift • Water uptake and permeability of structural roots • In collaboration with Andrew McElrone Grape roots • Many perennial root systems mimic top growth – grape roots
  • Transmission of Xylella Fastidiosa Through Pecan Rootstock

    Transmission of Xylella Fastidiosa Through Pecan Rootstock

    PLANT PATHOLOGY HORTSCIENCE 41(6):1455–1456. 2006. and Oct. 2005. The data from each year were combined, and statistical significance evalu- Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa ated by the chi-square test. through Pecan Rootstock Results and Discussion 1 The overall graft success rates were low R. S. Sanderlin and R. A. Melanson (54.5% for grafts on uninfected rootstocks Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Pecan Research-Extension and 40% on infected rootstocks), probably Station, PO Box 5519, Shreveport, LA 71135 because the trees had been confined to small pots for several years and were in poor Additional index words. Carya illinoinensis, graft transmission, pecan bacterial leaf scorch nutritional condition. Abstract. Xylella fastidiosa Wells et al., the pathogen that causes pecan [Carya illinoinensis In 2004, infected rootstocks came from (Wangenh.) C. Koch] bacterial leaf scorch disease, was demonstrated to be highly six seed sources and uninfected rootstocks transmissible through graft unions from infected rootstock into new growth developing came from five of the same six seed sources from scions. Infected rootstocks were obtained by inoculation of pecan seedlings in pots (Table 1). Eleven of the 12 successful grafts with in vitro cultures of the pathogen. If rootstock infection occurs in nature, trans- on infected rootstocks developed PBLS mission of the pathogen into tissue growing from scions could serve as a significant source symptoms in either 2004 or 2005, and 10 of of introduction of the disease into pecan orchards. Because symptom development in these tested positive for X. fastidiosa infec- infected trees typically begins in midsummer and grafting takes place in the early spring, tion in at least one of the serological assays it would be difficult to identify infected rootstock before grafting.
  • Propagating Grapevines

    Propagating Grapevines

    EHT-116 4/19 Propagating Grapevines Justin Scheiner and Andrew King Department of Horticultural Sciences, The Texas A&M University System Plant propagation is the process of creating new Dormant Hardwood Cuttings plants. Asexual propagation is the development Dormant canes are one-year-old wood that con- of a new plant from a piece of another plant. The tain buds. These canes are the tissue of choice for result is a plant that is genetically identical to propagating grapes. Most of the wood removed the mother or stock plant. Sexual propagation is during dormant winter pruning can be used to the development of a new plant from a seed with generate new vines (Fig. 1). Dormant canes con- genetic material from two plants. This process tain fully developed buds with rudimentary shoots results in offspring that are genetically different comprised of leaf and cluster primordia and stored from the mother plant and from one another. energy. The carbohydrates contained in the wood This difference is due to genetic recombination will fuel the growth of roots and shoots until the during meiosis. Although grapes can be readily new grapevine has enough functioning leaves to grown from seed, all commercial grape cultivars support itself. are propagated asexually. This is the only way to maintain the exact characteristics of a specific grape cultivar. The mother plant’s characteristics must be maintained to use the cultivar name for marketing purposes, such as on a wine label. Some of the grape cultivars grown today were developed hundreds of years ago and have been preserved through asexual propagation.
  • Apples: Organic Production Guide

    Apples: Organic Production Guide

    A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Apples: Organic Production Guide By Tammy Hinman This publication provides information on organic apple production from recent research and producer and Guy Ames, NCAT experience. Many aspects of apple production are the same whether the grower uses low-spray, organic, Agriculture Specialists or conventional management. Accordingly, this publication focuses on the aspects that differ from Published nonorganic practices—primarily pest and disease control, marketing, and economics. (Information on March 2011 organic weed control and fertility management in orchards is presented in a separate ATTRA publica- © NCAT tion, Tree Fruits: Organic Production Overview.) This publication introduces the major apple insect pests IP020 and diseases and the most effective organic management methods. It also includes farmer profiles of working orchards and a section dealing with economic and marketing considerations. There is an exten- sive list of resources for information and supplies and an appendix on disease-resistant apple varieties. Contents Introduction ......................1 Geographical Factors Affecting Disease and Pest Management ...........3 Insect and Mite Pests .....3 Insect IPM in Apples - Kaolin Clay ........6 Diseases ........................... 14 Mammal and Bird Pests .........................20 Thinning ..........................20 Weed and Orchard Floor Management ......20 Economics and Marketing ........................22 Conclusion
  • Full Text [PDF]

    Full Text [PDF]

    ® Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology ©2011 Global Science Books Apple Breeding – From the Origin to Genetic Engineering Andreas Peil1* • Markus Kellerhals2 • Monika Höfer1 • Henryk Flachowsky1 1 Julius Kühn-Institut - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Institute for Breeding Research on Horticultural and Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, D-01326 Dresden, Germany 2 Swiss Federal Research Station Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland Corresponding author : * [email protected] ABSTRACT Apple is the most important temperate fruit crop and ranks fourth in world production of fruits after citrus, grapes and bananas. Although more than 10,000 cultivars are documented, only a few dozen are grown on a commercial scale worldwide. Despite the abundant number of cultivars there is a demand for new cultivars better adapted to climatic conditions/changes and sustainable production. Yet, the challenge for apple breeding is the establishment of improved, multiple disease resistant cultivars with high and regularly yield suited for modern production systems. Due to the fast development of molecular techniques an increasing knowledge on the genome of apple is available, e.g. the whole genome sequence of ‘Golden Delicious’ (Velasco et al. 2010). Molecular markers for a lot of major traits, mostly resistance genes, and QTLs facilitate marker assisted selection, especially the pyramiding of resistance genes to achieve more durable resistance. Mainly the breakdown of the Rvi6 (Vf) scab resistance enhanced the breeding for pyramided resistance genes. But nevertheless, until now there is a gap between the existing molecular knowledge and its application in apple breeding. This paper will focus on the origin and domestication of apple, breeding objectives and classical as well as molecular approaches to achieve breeding aims.
  • Bench Grafting Fruit Trees

    Bench Grafting Fruit Trees

    Bench grafting fruit trees Bench grafting is where you graft a piece of scion wood onto a rootstock to grow a new tree. It is carried out in late winter or early spring, using dormant scion wood from a tree of the variety you want to propagate. There are many different methods of bench grafting, but the whip and tongue is a good one with high success rates. Whip and tongue method The ‘whip and tongue’ graft is probably the most widely adopted method of bench grafting. It is best done with root and scion material of the same thickness as this maximises the chance of cambial contact all the way around. The cambial layer lies between wood on the inside and bark on the outside, and grafting is enabled by joining cambial layers in the scion and root through corresponding cuts joined end to end and then bound. The interlocking ‘tongues’ add structural support to the join as the cambial layers heal and fuse together, as well giving a larger surface area of cambial contact. This graft is best done in late winter or early spring and it is extremely important that the scion wood is dormant, with no signs of growth. It is well worth practicing this on some spare pieces of fruit scion beforehand so that you are confident with the cuts you are making. Be careful not to touch the cut surface of either your scion or rootstock, as oils from your skin can interfere with the healing of the graft. The graft Make a slanting cut in the rootstock with a sharp grafting knife.
  • Rootstocks As a Management Strategy for Adverse Vineyard Conditions

    Rootstocks As a Management Strategy for Adverse Vineyard Conditions

    FACT SHEET 14 MODULE 14 Rootstocks as a management strategy for adverse vineyard conditions AUTHOR: Catherine Cox - Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia These updates are supported by the Australian Government through the Irrigation Industries Workshop Programme - Wine Industry Project in partnership with the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation. waterandvine.gwrdc.com.au Rootstocks as a management strategy for adverse vineyard conditions Introduction 2 Understanding different rootstock This Fact Sheet consolidates current knowledge around the key characteristics rootstocks used in Australian Viticulture in terms of tolerance to V. riparia x V. rupestris drought, salinity and lime. These rootstocks offer low-moderate vigour to the scion, and in The aim of this module is to briefly summarise the pros and cons certain situations hasten ripening. They do not tolerate drought of each rootstock and showcase the existing industry resources conditions. These characteristics make them particularly suited that can be used to aid in the selection of rootstocks in the key to cool climate viticulture. These rootstocks perform best on growing regions within the Murray Darling Basin. soils that dry out slowly and have moderate-high water holding For more information and training contact your local Innovator’s capacities. They impart low vigour to the scion and hence are Network member or go to http://waterandvine.gwrdc.com.au. suitable to high fertility sites and growing conditions. V. berlandieri x V. riparia 1 Introduction to rootstocks These rootstocks offer moderate-high vigour to the scion Grapevine rootstocks are derived from American Vitis species that depending on the soil type.
  • Guidelines for the Production and Handling of High Quality Grapevine Planting Material

    Guidelines for the Production and Handling of High Quality Grapevine Planting Material

    Grapevine Propagation; Principles and Methods for the Production and Handling of High Quality Grapevine Planting Material Helen Waite1*, David Gramaje2 and Lucie Morton3 1National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia 2Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (IAS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Alameda del Obispo s/n, P.O. Box 4084, 14080 Córdoba, Spain. 3Viticulturist, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. *Corresponding author [email protected] 1 Contents Draft Guidelines for the Production and Handling of High Quality Grapevine Planting Material .......... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Part 1: Quality Criteria for Vitis vinifera and Rootstock Cuttings Entering the Propagation Chain ........ 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Intrinsic characteristics of Good Quality Vitis vinifera and rootstock cuttings ................................... 5 Quality cuttings: .............................................................................................................................. 5 Visible Characteristics of good Quality Vitis vinifera and Rootstock Cuttings .................................... 6 Quality dormant cuttings are: ........................................................................................................
  • Effects of Rootstocks and Irrigation Levels on Grape Quality of Vitis Vinifera L

    Effects of Rootstocks and Irrigation Levels on Grape Quality of Vitis Vinifera L

    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 9(25), pp. 3801-3807, 21 June, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Effects of rootstocks and irrigation levels on grape quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz M. Ozden1*, H. Vardin2, M. Simsek3 and M. Karaaslan2 1Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, 63040 Sanliurfa, Turkey. 2Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, 63040 Sanliurfa, Turkey. 3Department of Farm Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, 63040 Sanliurfa, Turkey. Accepted 31 May, 2010 The influence of two rootstocks (SO4 and 1103P) on grape quality and berry chemical composition was studied in a factorial experiment, in field grown grapevines of cv. Shiraz (Vitis vinifera L.), subjected to five irrigation levels [0% (T1), 25% (T2), 50% (T3), 75% (T4) and 100% (T5) of irrigation depth (IW, mm): Class A pan evaporimeter (CPE)]. Spectrophotometric analyses of total anthocyanins (TA), total phenolics (TP) and total antioxidant activity (AA) in grape extracts were performed. Also, total soluble solids (TSS), total acidity, pH, total sugar content, ash, juice yield and color index of red grapes (CIRG) of berry samples were determined. TA, TP, AA, TSS, total sugar content, ash, and CIRG values decreased together with increasing irrigation levels. On the contrary, T4 and T5 irrigation treatments increased total acidity, pH and juice yield of samples compared to the effects of T1, T2 and T3 irrigation treatments for both rootstocks. Moreover, T1 or T2 treatments caused an increase in TA, TP, AA, TSS, total sugar content, ash, and CIRG index values of grape samples in comparison to that of vines irrigated with T3, T4 and T5 levels.
  • Vegetative Propagation of Chestnut

    Vegetative Propagation of Chestnut

    242 Vol. 4 VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF CHESTNUT E. VIEITEZ Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Santiago de Compositela, Spain (Received for publication 13 September 1973) ABSTRACT A review is made of the principal methods used for the vegetative propagation of chestnut (Castanea spp.). Results obtained by classical grafting, nursery grafting, topworking and budding are reported, as well as those from special techniques such as nurse seed grafting, juvenile tissue grafting, inverted radicle grafting, and layering. For stooling, the stage of growth of shoots is discussed as well as the effect of maleic hydrazide and the effects of etiolation caused by wrapping shoots with aluminium foil. For cuttings, the effect of juvenility, ageing, auxins and growth inhibitors are examined. The physiology of rooting is discussed, and the content of growth promoters and growth inhibitors in different types of cuttings is reported. A possible relationship is also suggested between the rootability of cuttings, their anatomical features and their content of growth promoters and growth inhibitors. INTRODUCTION The selection of chestnuts (Castanea spp.) which are resistant to blight or ink diseases, and the necessity of propagating them asexually, created one of the most complicated forestry problems of recent decades and attracted the attention of many people from both management and scientific fields. GRAFTING Grafting in chestnut has met with only limited success (Turner, 1964; Shafer, 1966). One of the main causes of failure is incompatibility between stock and scion. Reasons for this are many: lack of winter hardiness of stock-scion, chestnut blight in the graft union, poor grafting techniques, and the use of different strains or species of chestnut for stock and scion.
  • Signature Drinks

    Signature Drinks

    Signature Drinks SPICED CRANBERRY SANGRIA Red wine, brandy, triple sec, infused with cranberries & fresh apple. Cinnamon stick garnish RED SANGRIA Red wine infused apricot brandy, triple sec, fresh orange & apples. Fresh fruit garnish WHITE MOSCATO SANGRIA Moscato infused white wine, peach nectar, triple sec, Fresh peaches & sliced grapes ELECTRIC BLUE LEMONADE Citrus infused vodka, blue curacao, fresh country lemonade and sour mix. Fresh lemon garnish MOJITO Run, Mint infused simple syrup, freshly squeezed lime & club soda. Garnished with fresh mint Virgin (Non Alcoholic) Options: VIRGIN MERRY MIMOSAS Berry, orange juice, sparkling grape juice SHIRLEY TEMPLE Ginger ale, a splash of orange juice and a drizzle of grenadine FESTIVE FAMILY SANGRIA Ginger ale, passion fruit juice, fresh kiwi and cranberries drizzled with lime BLUEBERRY LEMONADE Fresh blueberries, lemon juice and mint leaves. Garnished with a sugared lemon wedge SPICED APPLE CIDER Homemade spiced apple cider, cinnamon stick garnish (Served hot or cold) STRAWBERRY MARGARITA Fresh strawberries, simple syrup, fresh lime juice and sour mix Served over ice or straight-up in a salt rimmed glass VIRGIN PIÑA COLADA Cream of coconut, crushed pineapple, pineapple juice garnished with a pineapple wedge Additional Options: SPICED APPLE BOURBON CIDER Homemade Spiced Apple Cider, Bourbon, Cinnamon Stick Garnish (Served Hot or Cold) S’MORES MARTINI Vodka, Crème De Cacao, Non-Dairy Creamer Served in a Marshmallow, Chocolate or Crushed Graham Cracker Rimmed Glass. Garnished with Mini S’mores.
  • Phytogeographic Basis Plant Breeding

    Phytogeographic Basis Plant Breeding

    PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC BASIS of PLANT BREEDING 1. Local Varieties and Their Significance :— The -varieties of cultivated plants grown in the different regions of the Soviet Union until recently were varieties introduced from various localities and countries, and were inseparable from human migration and colonization. The list of cultivated plants reflects the history of our country in its recent past, it shows the effects of individual peasant farming. In the separate groups and varieties of plants one can trace the routes by which they were brought from Western Europe, the United States, Asia Minor, Mongolia, and Iran. In the pre-revolutionary period, the introduction of new varieties in our country was haphazard. Beginning with the eighteenth century, individual amateur growers and societies unsystemati- cally introduced new varieties from abroad. Sometimes these new varieties were quite valuable but because of the vastness of our country and the com- plete absence of any state-planned system of plant introduction, the imported varieties usually restricted themselves to very limited areas and disappeared. It may be considered that pedigree seed production, in the real meaning of the term, did not exist in our country before the October Revolution. We have just begun a planned distribution of varieties in accordance with the needs of our large-scale socialized and mechanized agricultural economy. Yet, there is no doubt that the varietal materials which were introduced in our country and cultivated for decades and centuries were subjected to natural selection, and also to deliberate or casual artificial selection, and that some local varieties evolved that were ecologically adapted. The proximity of the Soviet Union to the basic centers of origin of numer- ous cultivated plants facilitated the selection of exceptionally valuable forms.