Tara Leigh Grove's CV

Home , Bloomberg Law

TARA LEIGH GROVE Charles E. Tweedy, Jr., Endowed Chairholder of Law Director, Program in Constitutional Studies University of Alabama School of Law P.O. Box 870382, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 Email: [email protected]; Phone: 205-348-2032

ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE

University of Alabama School of Law, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2020-present Charles E. Tweedy, Jr., Endowed Chairholder of Law & Director, Program in Constitutional Studies

Courses: Federal Courts, Constitutional Law, Legislation and Regulation, and Civil Procedure

William & Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia, Mills E. Godwin, Jr., Professor of Law 2011-2020

Courses: Federal Courts, Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, Congress and the Courts (seminar)

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Visiting Professor Fall 2017

Courses: Civil Procedure, Congress and the Courts (reading group)

Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois, Visiting Professor Fall 2012

Course: Civil Procedure

Florida State University College of Law, Tallahassee, Florida, Assistant Professor of Law 2009-2011

Courses: Federal Courts, Constitutional Law, Bankruptcy, Statutory Interpretation (seminar)

ACADEMIC WORKS

FEDERAL COURTS AND THE LAW OF FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS (9th ed.): 2021 Supplement (with Peter W. Low, John C. Jeffries, Jr., & Curtis A. Bradley) (forthcoming 2021)

Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary, 121 COLUM. L. REV. 1555 (2021)

Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Some Puzzles of State Standing, 94 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1883 (2019) (invited essay: Foreword to Symposium on Federal Courts, Practice and Procedure) 1

ACADEMIC WORKS (CONT.)

The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018)

The Power of “So-Called Judges,” 93 N.Y.U. L. REV. ONLINE 14 (2018) (invited essay: Symposium on “Courts Under Pressure: Protecting Rule of Law in the Age of Trump”)

Justice Scalia’s Other Standing Legacy, 84 U. CHI. L. REV. 2243 (2017) (invited essay: Special Issue on Justice Antonin Scalia’s jurisprudence)

When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Tiers of Scrutiny in a Hierarchical Judiciary, 14 GEO. J. L. & PUB. POL’Y 475 (2016) (invited essay: Symposium on “Is the Rational Basis Test Unconstitutional?”)

The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine, 90 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1908 (2015)

Article III in the Political Branches, 90 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1835 (2015) (invited essay: Symposium on Federal Courts, Practice and Procedure)

Standing Outside of Article III, 162 U. PA. L. REV. 1311 (2014)

Congress’s (Limited) Power to Represent Itself in Court, 99 CORNELL L. REV. 571 (2014) (with Neal Devins)

The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard, 113 COLUM. L. REV. 929 (2013)

A (Modest) Separation of Powers Success Story, 87 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1647 (2012) (invited essay: Symposium on Federal Courts, Practice and Procedure)

The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 112 COLUM. L. REV. 250 (2012)

The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 124 HARV. L. REV. 869 (2011)

The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism, 95 CORNELL L. REV. 1 (2009)

Standing as an Article II Nondelegation Doctrine, 11 U. PENN. J. CONST. L. 781 (2009)

EDUCATION

Harvard Law School, J.D., June 2002, magna cum laude Honors/Activities: Harvard Law Review, Supreme Court Chair Professor Laurence Tribe, Research Assistant/Teaching Assistant

Duke University, B.A., Political Science, May 1998, summa cum laude Minors: French, Japanese

AWARDS

Cabell Research Professorship, William and Mary Law School 2019-2020

Walter L. Williams, Jr., Memorial Teaching Award, William and Mary Law School May 2018

Plumeri Award for Faculty Excellence, College of William and Mary February 2017

Alumni Fellowship Award for Teaching Excellence, College of William and Mary September 2016 Conferred annually on one graduate school professor for excellence in teaching

Paul M. Bator Award February 2016 National award conferred annually by the Federalist Society on an outstanding legal scholar under the age of forty

Cabell Research Professorship, William and Mary Law School 2016-2017

Robert and Elizabeth Scott Research Professorship, William and Mary Law School 2015-2016

Plumeri Award for Faculty Excellence, College of William and Mary January 2014

Best Untenured Federal Courts Article of 2012 (inaugural recipient) January 2013 Conferred by the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools for The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 112 COLUM. L. REV. 250 (2012)

PRESENTATIONS

Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut (Zoom) April 2021 Presented Which Textualism?

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. (Zoom) April 2021 Discussant, Constitutional Law Symposium: Salmon P. Chase Faculty Colloquium Topic: Commemorating the Nineteenth Amendment

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia (Zoom) February 2021 Symposium: Originalism Under Fire Panelist, Textualism After Bostock Presented Which Textualism?

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland February 2013 Discussion Group on Constitutionalism Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California (Zoom) February 2021 Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism Commentator, Originalism Works-in-Progress Conference

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia (Zoom) February 2021 Institute for Bill of Rights Law Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

Federal Courts Panel, Association of American Law Schools (Zoom) January 2021 2021 Annual Meeting Topic: Federal Courts Employment Reforms

Association of American Law Schools (Zoom) January 2021 2021 Annual Meeting Topic: The Political Question Doctrine, Departmentalism, and the Limits of Justiciability Presented The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine

Twenty-Third Annual Faculty Conference (Zoom) January 2021 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California (Zoom) January 2021 Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia (Zoom) November 2020 Bostock, the Future of LGBTQ+ Rights, and Textualism Presented Which Textualism?

University of Alabama School of Law, Tuscaloosa, Alabama (Zoom) November 2020 Moderator, Conversation with Justice Sotomayor

Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Chicago, Illinois (Zoom) November 2020 Eleventh Annual Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia (Zoom) October 2020 Panelist, Court Reform: How and Whether to Reform our Nation’s Highest Court

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia (Zoom) October 2020 Federal Courts Seminar Presented The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma and Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, Washington, D.C. (Zoom) October 2020 Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State: Research Roundtable Discussant, Judicial Review After Kisor and the Census Case

University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin (Zoom) October 2020 Wisconsin Discussion Group on Constitutionalism Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

University of Alabama School of Law, Tuscaloosa, Alabama (Zoom) October 2020 Presented Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary

University of Connecticut School of Law, Hartford, Connecticut (Zoom) October 2020 Connecticut Law Review Symposium Empires or Umpires?: Political Questions, Separation of Powers, and Judicial Legitimacy Panelist, The Constitution, the Courts, and the Development of the Political Question Doctrine Presented The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Zoom) September 2020 Harvard Law Review Colloquium Series Presented Which Textualism?

Teaching Civil Procedure from a Distance (Zoom) June 2020 Presented Socratic Teaching Even for the Non-Tech Savvy

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia February 2020 Originalism and Stare Decisis Presented Tiers of Scrutiny in a Hierarchical Judiciary

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia February 2020 Black Law Students Association Symposium: Social Activism and the Law

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia January 2020 Blackstone Lecture: The Fragility of Judicial Independence

Twenty-Second Annual Faculty Conference, New Orleans, LA January 2020 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Panelist, Is Everything Political?

Duke University School of Law, Durham, NC December 2019 Roundtable: Judicial Administration/Judicial Process

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. December 2019 Discussant, Constitutional Law Symposium: Seventh Annual Salmon P. Chase Faculty Colloquium Topic: Commemorating the 200th anniversary of McCulloch v. Maryland

2019 National Lawyers Convention, Washington, D.C. November 2019 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Panelist, Originalism and Precedent

University of Texas School of Law, Austin, Texas October 2019 Commentator, Civil Procedure Workshop

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

District Conference: Independence and the Courts, Providence, Rhode Island October 2019 U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island Panelist, Threats to Judicial Independence Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

Marquette Law School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin October 2019 Panelist, Public Understanding and Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court Presented The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma

Temple University Beasley School of Law, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania October 2019 Panelist, “The People v. the White House: Using State Legal Institutions to Influence and Control Federal Policy” Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

University of Alabama School of Law, Tuscaloosa, Alabama September 2019 Presented Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2018 Supreme Court Preview Panelist, Chief Justice Roberts and Challenges to the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (Event: Washington, D.C.) June 2019 Hoover Institution: Regulation and Rule of Law Conference Presented State Litigants as Federal Policymakers

U.S. Capitol Visitor’s Center: Senate Meeting Room, Washington, D.C. May 2019 Panel: “Congress and the Judiciary: What the House and Senate Can Do to Fix the Courts” Presented The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. April 2019 Georgetown Advanced Constitutional Law Seminar Presented Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory

University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, Illinois April 2019 “Government Plaintiffs and the New Frontier of Standing” Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury and When Can a State Sue the United States?

Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, Washington, D.C. April 2019 Presented Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. April 2019 Discussant, Constitutional Law Symposium: Thomas Cooley Book Prize & Symposium Focus: Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2019 Climenko Fellow Reunion Moderator and Panelist, Entry-Level Hiring

Stanford Law School, Palo Alto, California March 2019 Constitutional Conversations “State Suits Against the Federal Government: Are They Constitutional and What Are the Limits?” Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California March 2019 Hoover Institution: Regulation and Rule of Law Conference Presented State Litigants as Federal Policymakers

University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, Tucson, Arizona March 2019 National Conference of Constitutional Law Scholars Presented Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory

University of Texas School of Law, Austin, Texas February 2019 American Constitution Society & Texas Law Review Symposium: Reclaiming—and Restoring—Constitutional Norms Panelist, “Norms for—and Toward—the Judiciary”

Stanford Law School, Palo Alto, California February 2019 Panelist, Supreme Court at Mid-Term Conference

University of Florida Levin College of Law, Gainesville, Florida January 2019 Presented Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory

Federal Courts Panel, Association of American Law Schools, New Orleans, LA January 2019 2019 Annual Meeting Topic: Teaching the Federal Courts Class

Twenty-First Annual Faculty Conference, New Orleans, LA January 2019 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Moderator, Debate: Resolved: The Supreme Court Should Overrule Qualified Immunity

Twenty-First Annual Faculty Conference, New Orleans, LA January 2019 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Presented Is the Supreme Court Still Legitimate?

Duke University School of Law, Durham, NC December 2018 Roundtable: Judicial Administration/Judicial Process Presented Is the Supreme Court Still Legitimate? (later retitled The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma)

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

Federal Judicial Center & National Constitution Center, Philadelphia, PA December 2018 Judicial Independence and the Federal Courts: A Historical Perspective Panelist, Judicial Independence and the Federal Courts in the 20th Century Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. December 2018 Discussant, Constitutional Law Symposium: Sixth Annual Salmon P. Chase Faculty Colloquium Topic: Constitutional Limitations at 150

Stanford Law School, Palo Alto, California November 2018 Civil Procedure Workshop Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury

University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa October 2018 Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury

George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C. September 2018 NATSECDEF 2018: “Preserving Justice in National Security” Panelist, The Meaning of Judicial Independence in Counter-Terrorism Cases Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

University of Southern California Gould School of Law, Los Angeles, California September 2018 Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2018 Supreme Court Preview Panelist, The Legal Resistance to the Trump Administration

Next Generation of Legal Scholars Colloquium, Park City, Utah September 2018 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Discussant, Topics in Constitutional Law

Brennan Center: Emergency Planning Meeting, Washington, D.C. June 2018 Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

District of Columbia Bar, Administrative Law and Agency Practice, Washington, D.C. May 2018 Panelist, A Discussion About Suing the President Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. April 2018 Discussant, Constitutional Law Symposium: Thomas Cooley Book Prize & Symposium Focus: A Great Power of Attorney: Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution

Berkeley Law, Berkeley, CA March 2018 2018 Public Law & Policy Workshop Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. March 2018 Georgetown Advanced Constitutional Law Seminar Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA February 2018 “When Suing the Government Isn’t the Answer” Presented Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury and When Can a State Sue the United States?

New York University School of Law, New York, New York November 2017 Courts Under Pressure: Protecting Rule of Law in the Age of Trump Panelist, Is Judicial Independence at Risk? Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts October 2017 American Constitution Society Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts October 2017 Panelist, Preview of the Supreme Court’s 2017 Term

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2017 Supreme Court Preview Panelist, The Constitution Under Trump

Workshop for Judges of the Fourth Circuit, Baltimore, Maryland June 2017 Credibility, Courts and the Constitution: Judging in Interesting Times Panelist, Constitutional Issues in Litigation Between State and Federal Governments Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia February 2017 Presented The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence

Federal Courts Panel, Association of American Law Schools, San Francisco, CA January 2017 2017 Annual Meeting Topic: Inter-governmental Disputes and Justiciability Presented When Can Federal Institutions Assert “Institutional Injuries”?

Nineteenth Annual Faculty Conference, San Francisco, CA January 2017 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Presented Building Conventions of Judicial Independence (later retitled The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence)

Council of State Governments, Williamsburg, VA December 2016 2016 Annual Meeting Topic: Defending the Principles of Federalism Presented When Can a State Sue the United States? 9

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

Institute for Justice, Washington, D.C. October 2016 Topic: Are the Cases Out There? Scrutinizing the Supreme Court’s Declining Docket Panelist, Exploring the Court’s Docket Management—Is Reform Needed?

George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C. March 2016 Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia February 2016 2016 National Student Symposium for the Federalist Society Panelist, Becoming a Law Professor

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia February 2016 Host, William & Mary Law Review Symposium Topic: Judicial Supremacy v. Departmentalism Moderator, The Politics of Interpretive Control

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. February 2016 Symposium: Is the Rational Basis Test Unconstitutional? Presented Tiers of Scrutiny in a Hierarchical Judiciary

University of Notre Dame in London, London, England February 2016 Comparative Perspectives on Commonwealth and American Constitutional Law Commentator, Bottom-Up and Top-Down Constitutional Conventions

Eighteenth Annual Faculty Conference, Washington, D.C. January 2016 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Young Legal Scholars Paper Competition Panel Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin November 2015 Wisconsin Discussion Group on Constitutionalism Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Chicago, Illinois November 2015 Sixth Annual Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented When Can a State Sue the United States?

Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina October 2015 Roundtable: Historical Practice and the Federal Judicial Power Presented The Article III Anticanon

Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois September 2015 Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2015 Supreme Court Preview Moderator, Obama, the Court, and the Battle Over Executive Power

2015 Junior Scholars Colloquium, Warrenton, VA June 2015 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Presented Reconsidering the Political Question Doctrine (later retitled The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine)

Widener University School of Law, Harrisburg, PA April 2015 Ninth Annual John L. Gedid Lecture Presented The Executive’s Duty to Enforce the Law

Federal Courts Panel, Association of American Law Schools, Washington, D.C. January 2015 2015 Annual Meeting Topic: The Role of History in the Federal Courts Canon Presented Article III in the Political Branches

Seventeenth Annual Faculty Conference, Washington, D.C. January 2015 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Moderator, The Executive Power to Not Enforce the Law

Seventeenth Annual Faculty Conference, Washington, D.C. January 2015 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Presented Reconsidering the Political Question Doctrine

University of Texas School of Law, Austin, Texas November 2014 Presented Reconsidering the Political Question Doctrine

University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illinois October 2014 Program on Constitutional Theory, History and Law Presented Reconsidering the Political Question Doctrine

University of Georgia School of Law, Athens, Georgia October 2014 Seventh Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop Presented Reconsidering the Political Question Doctrine

Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, Tennessee May 2014 New Voices in Civil Justice Workshop Presented Standing Outside of Article III

American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C. April 2014 Presented Standing Outside of Article III

TEDx Event, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia April 2014 Presented The Executive’s Duty to Enforce the Law

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia February 2014 The Contemporary First Amendment: Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly Moderator, Free Speech and Economic Interests

Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Chicago, Illinois November 2013 Fourth Annual Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented Standing Outside of Article III

Brooklyn Law School, Brooklyn, New York October 2013 Sixth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop Presented Standing Outside of Article III

Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. September 2013 Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented Standing Outside of Article III

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2013 Supreme Court Preview Moderator, First Amendment and Separation of Powers

Florida State University College of Law, Tallahassee, Florida September 2013 Presented Standing Outside of Article III

University of Richmond School of Law, Richmond, Virginia April 2013 Virginia Junior Faculty Forum Presented The Non-Article III Foundations of Standing

University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illinois April 2013 Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court (later retitled Congress’s (Limited) Power to Represent Itself in Court)

University of Alabama School of Law, Birmingham, Alabama February 2013 Symposium: The Structure of Standing at 25 (in honor of Judge William Fletcher) Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland February 2013 Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court

Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Chicago, Illinois November 2012 Third Annual Constitutional Law Colloquium Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia October 2012 Fifth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop (Host, Organizer, and Presenter) Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois October 2012 Presented The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard

Tulane University Law School, New Orleans, Louisiana September 2012 Presented The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2012 Supreme Court Preview Moderator, International Law and Federal Courts

Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois August 2012 Faculty Scholarship Day Presented Why Congress Cannot Represent Itself in Court

Southeastern Association of Law Schools, Amelia Island, Florida July 2012 Moderator, Federal Courts and Passive-Aggressive Virtues

Washington and Lee University School of Law, Lexington, Virginia February 2012 Presented The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard

University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin November 2011 Wisconsin Discussion Group on Constitutionalism Presented Second-Best Safeguards for the Federal Judiciary

Notre Dame Law School, South Bend, Indiana October 2011 Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Fordham University School of Law, New York, New York October 2011 Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Kansas University School of Law, Lawrence, Kansas September 2011 Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2011 Supreme Court Preview Moderator, Separation of Powers and Gun Rights

American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C. September 2011 Judges and Judging Workshop Presented The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard

Southeastern Association of Law Schools, Hilton Head, South Carolina July 2011 Moderator, The National Security Constitution and the Federal Courts Canon

Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois February 2011 Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

PRESENTATIONS (CONT.)

University of Florida Levin College of Law, Gainesville, Florida December 2010 Southeast Regional Junior Faculty Working Papers Conference Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Emory Law, Atlanta, Georgia November 2010 Presented The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Boston University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts October 2010 Presented The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illinois October 2010 Third Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop (held in Chicago, Illinois) Presented The Article II Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

William and Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia September 2010 Presented The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, Tennessee April 2010 Presented The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

Michigan State University College of Law, Lansing, Michigan October 2009 Second Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop Presented The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction

University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia May 2009 May Gathering Presented The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism

ACADEMIC SERVICE

Commissioner, Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States 2021-present

Director, Program in Constitutional Studies, University of Alabama School of Law 2020-present

Strategic Planning Committee: Curriculum, University of Alabama School of Law 2021-present

Executive Committee, Federal Courts Section, Association of American Law Schools 2011-present

Committee for Academic Freedom and Tenure, Association of American Law Schools 2019-present

Chair, Federal Courts Section, Association of American Law Schools 2014-2015

Chair-Elect, Federal Courts Section, Association of American Law Schools 2013-2014

Prize Committee, Federal Courts Section, Association of American Law Schools 2014-2017, 2019-2020

ACADEMIC SERVICE (CONT.)

Advisor, National Public Radio, WNYC: Radiolab Supreme Court Podcast, More Perfect 2016-present

Advisor, The Constitution Project: Protecting Judicial Independence 2018-2020 This role entailed weekly conference calls and regular visits to Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. to meet with members of Congress or congressional staffers to discuss issues related to the judiciary, including court-curbing proposals.

Senior Commentator, Women in Law Teaching Workshop Summer 2021

Senior Commentator, Incoming Faculty Workshop: Advice for New Teachers Summer 2021

Senior Commentator, Incoming Faculty Workshop: Advice for New Teachers Summer 2020

Senior Commentator, Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations January 2020

Senior Commentator, Fifth Annual Civil Procedure Workshop October 2019 (University of Texas School of Law)

Senior Commentator, Incoming Faculty Workshop: Advice for New Teachers Summer 2019

Senior Commentator, Tenth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop Fall 2018 (University of Oklahoma College of Law)

Senior Commentator, Junior Scholars’ Colloquium Summer 2018

Senior Commentator, Incoming Faculty Workshop: Advice for New Teachers Summer 2018

Discussant, Colloquium: Originalism and Precedent, San Antonio, Texas Spring 2018

Senior Commentator, Ninth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop Spring 2017 (Emory Law)

Organizer, Fifth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop (William & Mary Law) Fall 2012

Appointments Committee, William and Mary Law School 2018-2020

Chair, Appointments Committee, William and Mary Law School 2018-2019

Status Committee, William and Mary Law School Spring 2020

Clerkship Committee, William and Mary Law School 2017-2020

Mentoring Program, William and Mary Law School 2016-2020 Mentor to Jay Butler

Ad-hoc Committee on Student Contact Hours, William and Mary Law School 2019-2020

ACADEMIC SERVICE (CONT.)

Search Committee for Chief Compliance Officer, College of William and Mary Spring 2019

Delegate, William and Mary, House of Representatives, Association of American Law Schools 2018-2019

Tack Faculty Lecture Series—Selection Committee, College of William and Mary Spring 2018

Delegate, William and Mary, House of Representatives, Association of American Law Schools 2016-2017

Organizer, 2016 William and Mary Law Review Symposium (Feb. 19-20, 2016) 2014-2016 Topic: Judicial Supremacy v. Departmentalism

Appointments Committee, William and Mary Law School Summer-Fall 2015

Self-Study Committee, William and Mary Law School Summer-Fall 2015

Clerkship Committee, William and Mary Law School Fall 2015

Founder, Junior Scholars’ Research Discussion Group, William and Mary Law School 2013-2015

Delegate, William and Mary, House of Representatives, Association of American Law Schools 2014-2015

Student Fee Professorship Committee (Class of 2018 Professor), College of William and Mary Spring 2015

Dean’s Advisory Committee, William and Mary Law School 2014-2015

Faculty Secretary, William and Mary Law School 2013-2014

Faculty Research and Enrichment Committee, William and Mary Law School 2011-2013

Dean’s Advisory Committee, William and Mary Law School 2011-2012

Appointments Committee, Florida State University College of Law January-December 2010

Curriculum Committee, Florida State University College of Law 2009-2010

Coach, Moot Court Team, Florida State University College of Law 2010-2011

LEGAL WORK EXPERIENCE

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., Attorney 2003-2007

Prepared appellate court briefs and presented 15 oral arguments in the courts of appeals on issues including administrative law, civil procedure, and statutory interpretation, with a particular focus on bankruptcy. Served as lead counsel in cases arising under Chapters 7, 11, and 13. Oversaw litigation arising out of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.

LEGAL WORK EXPERIENCE (CONT.)

Judge Emilio Garza, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Law Clerk 2002-2003

Hunton and Williams, Richmond, Virginia, Summer Associate Summer 2000

OTHER TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Climenko Fellow & Lecturer on Law 2007-2009

Yoto Junior High School, Utsunomiya, Japan, English Teacher 1998-1999

OTHER ACADEMIC WORKS

Case Comment, Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 115 HARV. L. REV. 447 (2001)

Developments in the Law (Part VI), 114 HARV. L. REV. 2049 (2001) The International Judicial Dialogue: When Domestic Constitutional Courts Join the Conversation

MEDIA

Quoted in Alan J. Borsuk, Still Winning in the Court of Public Opinion: Views of the Supreme Court Remain Generally Favorable and That May Have an Impact on What the Justices Do in the Coming Times, MARQUETTE LAWYER (Summer 2021), https://law.marquette.edu/assets/marquette-lawyers/pdf/marquette- lawyer/2021-summer/2021-summer-p32.pdf

Interviewed by David Westin, The Upcoming Supreme Court Docket: Podcast (discussing the Supreme Court’s agreement to take up a Mississippi abortion case), BLOOMBERG RADIO (May 18, 2021), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/audio/2021-05-18/the-upcoming-supreme-court-docket-podcast

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States announced in President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, The White House: Statements and Releases (April 9, 2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing- room/statements-releases/2021/04/09/president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-creating-the-presidential- commission-on-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Amy Howe, Biden to create bipartisan commission on Supreme Court reform, SCOTUSblog (Apr. 9, 2021, 1:27 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/biden-to-create-bipartisan-commission-on-supreme-court-reform/

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States discussed in Rick Hills, Taking Constitutional Conventions Seriously: Biden's SCOTUS Commission and the Futility of Comprehensive SCOTUS Reform, PrawfsBlawg (Apr. 21, 2021), https://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2021/04/tomorrow-evening-at-8-pm-eastern-time-i-am-joining- four-other-profs-nelson-mahboubi-eric-segall-marin-levy-and-tom-ginsb.html#comments 17

MEDIA (CONT.)

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Rachel Reed, President Biden appoints 16 Harvard Law School faculty and alumni to panel studying Supreme Court reform: The bipartisan commission is expected to analyze the ‘merits and legality’ of ideas such as term limits and additional justices, HARVARD LAW TODAY, (April 14, 2021), https://today.law.harvard.edu/president-biden-appoints-16-harvard-law-school-faculty-and-alumni-to-panel- studying-supreme-court-reform/

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Brian Leiter, Presidential commission on reform of the Supreme Court includes many law professors, Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports, (April 13, 2021), https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/04/presidential- commission-on-.html

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Debra Cassens Weiss, Law profs abound on Biden's new commission to study changing the Supreme Court, ABA JOURNAL, (April 9, 2021), https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/law-profs-abound-on-bidens-new-commission-to- study-changing-the-supreme-court

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Commission_on_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States (2021), Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_Commission_on_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_(2021)

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Josh Blackman, The Tenth Rule of Court Packing Is Play Your Base By Appointing A Well-Balanced Commission With No Actual Mandate, Reason: The Volokh Conspiracy, (April 9, 2021), https://reason.com/volokh/2021/04/09/the-tenth-rule-of-court-packing-is-play-your-base-by-appointing-a- well-balanced-commission-with-no-actual-mandate/

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Biden to Form Panel Studying Expanding Supreme Court, Spectrum News: New York (April 9, 2021), https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2021/04/09/biden-supreme-court-

Service on Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States mentioned in Emily Goodin, Biden launches 36-strong 'court-packing' commission to look at dismantling Trump's right-leaning Supreme Court by getting more liberal judges on the bench, DAILY MAIL (April 9, 2021), https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9454617/Biden-form-commission-reform-Supreme-Court-W- House.html

Quoted in Mike Cason, Alabama lawmakers take sides in national debate over gun rights, ALABAMA LOCAL NEWS, BREAKING NEWS, SPORTS, AND WEATHER (AL.COM) (March 27, 2021), https://www.al.com/news/2021/03/alabama-lawmakers-take-sides-in-national-debate-over-gun-rights.html

MEDIA (CONT.)

Article highlighted in Christian I. Bale, A Norm Restored? OMB’s Review of Draft Executive Orders, YALE J. REG. (March 23, 2021), https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/a-norm-restored-ombs-review-of-draft-executive- orders-by-christian-i-bale/ Highlighted Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

Article highlighted in Laura Orr, Another View of the Textualism and Statutory Interpretation Theory Cathedral (Jot Well) (linking to Anita Krishnakumar, The Multiple Faces of Textualism, JOTWELL (Jan. 15, 2021) (reviewing Tara Leigh Grove, Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)), https://lex.jotwell.com/the-multiple-faces-of-textualism/) Highlighted Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Scholarship relied on by Joan Biskupic, Biden’s Supreme Court commission set to launch as some liberals are eager to pack the court, CNN (Jan. 30, 2021), https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/30/politics/supreme-court- biden-commission/index.html

Quoted in Bart Jansen, Senate Impeachment Trial—Early signs hint acquittal: Trump’s words likely to be key evidence at trial, USA TODAY, at A1, A3 (Jan. 27, 2021)

Quoted in Bart Jansen, Senate Republicans overwhelmingly back failed challenge to impeachment trial, hinting at Trump acquittal, USA TODAY (Jan. 26, 2021), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2021/01/26/donald-trump-impeachment-trial-begin-senate-mulls- witnesses/6660660002/

Article featured in Anita Krishnakumar, The Multiple Faces of Textualism, JOTWELL (Jan. 15, 2021) (reviewing Tara Leigh Grove, Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)), https://lex.jotwell.com/the-multiple-faces-of-textualism/ Featured Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Article selected as a Download of the Year from 2020, LEGAL THEORY BLOG (edited by Lawrence Solum) (Jan. 1, 2021), https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2021/01/kevin-tobia-georgetown-university-law- center-georgetown-university-department-of-philosophy-john-mikhail-georgetown-uni.html Selected Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Article highlighted in Michael Ramsey, The Year in Review: Originalism Articles of 2020 (Part 2) - the "Top 25"?, The Originalism Blog (Jan. 6, 2020), https://originalismblog.typepad.com/the-originalismblog/2021/01/the-year-in-review-top-originalism-articles-of-2020-part-2michael-ramsey.html (Article listed as the fourth-most-downloaded) Highlighted Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Article featured in Amanda Frost, Academic highlight: The past, present and future of court packing, SCOTUSblog (Dec. 22, 2020, 10:30 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/12/academic-highlight-the- past-present-and-future-of-court-packing/ Featured The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018)

Quoted in Joan Biskupic, Supreme Court’s liberals face a new era of conservative dominance, CNN (Dec. 3, 2020), https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/03/politics/supreme-court-breyer-sotomayor-kagan/index.html

MEDIA (CONT.)

Quoted in Noah Y. Kim, Reassignment of Supreme Court justices won’t affect election results, POLITIFACT (Dec. 2, 2020), https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/02/gop-daily-brief/reassignment-supreme- court-justices-wont-affect-el/

Interviewed and article featured in Brian L. Frye, Ipse Dixit: Tara Leigh Grove of Versions of Textualism (Nov. 18, 2020), https://shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/episodes/tara-leigh-grove-of-versions-of-textualism Featured Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Quoted in Andrew Ross Sorkin, Jason Karaian, Michael J. de la Merced, Lauren Hirsch, & Ephrat Livni, Where Is Wall Street in Biden’s Transition Team?, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 11, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/11/business/dealbook/biden-transition-wall-street.html

Scholarship quoted and linked in Bruce Peabody, How the Supreme Court can maintain its legitimacy amid intensifying partisanship, KIOWA COUNTY PRESS (Oct. 25, 2020), https://kiowacountypress.net/content/how- supreme-court-can-maintain-its-legitimacy-amid-intensifying-partisanship Quoted and linked to The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Quoted in Bob Egelko, Equal Rights Amendment battle highlights obstacles to challenging federal decisions in court, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE (Oct. 23, 2020), https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Equal- Rights-Amendment-battle-highlights-15671497.php

Interviewed by David Westin, Balance of Power, BLOOMBERG TELEVISION (Oct. 13, 2020) (beg.-9:02), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2020-10-13/-balance-of-power-full-show-10-13-2020-video

Article highlighted in Christopher J. Walker, Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, September 2020 Edition (Oct. 8, 2020), https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/administrative-law-ssrn-reading-list-september-2020- edition/ (listing the most-downloaded recent papers) Highighted Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Interviewed by David Westin, Balance of Power, BLOOMBERG TELEVISION (Sept. 28, 2020) (2:30-11:55), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2020-09-28/-balance-of-power-full-show-09-28-2020-video

Article selected as Download of the Week, LEGAL THEORY BLOG (edited by Lawrence Solum) (Sept. 26, 2020), https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2020/09/download-of-the-week-.html Selected Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Quoted in Cara Bayles, RBG’s Biggest Opinions, From Civil Rights To Civil Procedure, LAW360 (Sept. 20, 2020), https://www.law360.com/texas/articles/1311928/rbg-s-biggest-opinions-from-civil-rights-to-civil- procedure

Quoted in Greg Stohr, Trump’s Court Redo Is Set to be Even Broader If He Wins New Term, BLOOMBERG (Aug. 21, 2020), https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/trump-s-court-redo-is-set-to-be-even-broader-if- he-wins-new-term

MEDIA (CONT.)

Article highlighted in Michael Ramsey, Tara Leigh Grove: Which Textualism?, The Originalism Blog (Aug. 18, 2020), https://originalismblog.typepad.com/the-originalism-blog/2020/08/tara-leigh-grove-which- textualismmichael-ramsey.html Highlighted Which Textualism?, 134 HARV. L. REV. 265 (2020)

Quoted in Tamara Keith, 'All Bark And No Bite': Trump Holds Prescription Drug-Pricing Order In Search Of Deal, NPR MORNING EDITION (Aug. 9, 2020), https://www.npr.org/2020/08/07/899937565/all-bark-and- no-bite-trump-holds-prescription-drug-pricing-order-in-search-of-de Story heard on NPR Morning Edition (5:22 am; 7:22 am Eastern) Comments drew on Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

Mentioned in Brian Leiter, Ten lateral moves that made law professors take notice during 2019-20, Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports, https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2020/08/ten-lateral-moves-that- made-law-professors-take-notice-during-2019-20.html

Quoted in Andrew Kragie, GOP Proxy Voting Challenge Faces Long Odds In Courts, LAW360 (May 29, 2020), https://www.law360.com/appellate/articles/1277414/gop-proxy-voting-challenge-faces-long-odds-in- courts

Quoted and scholarship discussed in Alan J. Borsuk, A Favorable Court Opinion, but Not Unanimous, MARQUETTE LAWYER (Summer 2020), https://law.marquette.edu/assets/marquette-lawyers/pdf/marquette- lawyer/2020-summer/2020-summer-full.pdf Discussed The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Quoted in Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux, Will The Supreme Court Finally Force Trump’s Tax Returns To Be Released?, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT (May 11, 2020), https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/will-the-supreme-court- finally-force-trumps-tax-returns-to-be-released/

Quoted in Ephrat Livni, The U.S. Supreme Court May Be Trying to Dodge Trump’s Tax Case, QUARTZ (April 29, 2020), https://qz.com/1847072/the-us-supreme-court-may-be-trying-to-dodge-trumps-tax-case/

Article selected as Download of the Week, LEGAL THEORY BLOG (edited by Lawrence Solum) (April 18, 2020), https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2020/04/download-of-the-week-sacrificing-legitimacy-in-a- hierarchical-judiciary-by-grove.html Selected Sacrificing Legitimacy in a Hierarchical Judiciary, 121 COLUM. L. REV. __ (forthcoming 2021)

Quoted in Greg Stohr, Top Court Poised to Act on Trump Bid to Shield Financial Records, BLOOMBERG LAW (Dec. 13, 2019), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/top-court-poised-to-act-on-trump-bid- to-shield-financial-records

Article mentioned in Michael B. Coenen, Presidential Administration and Judicial Review, JOTWELL (Nov. 28, 2019) (reviewing Lisa Manheim and Kathryn A. Watts, Reviewing Presidential Orders, 86 U. CHI. L. REV. 1743 (2019)), https://conlaw.jotwell.com/presidential-administration-and-judicial-review/ Mentioned Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

MEDIA (CONT.)

Quoted in Melissa Quinn, John Roberts is sucked into the vortex, WASHINGTON EXAMINER (Nov. 14, 2019), https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sucked-into-the-vortex

Quoted in Robert Barnes, Polls show trust in Supreme Court, but there is growing interest in fixed terms and other changes, WASH. POST (Oct. 24, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/polls-show-trust-in-supreme-court-but-there-is- growing-interest-in-fixed-terms-and-other-changes/2019/10/24/dcbbcba4-f64c-11e9-8cf0- 4cc99f74d127_story.html

Article discussed in Christopher J. Walker, My Jotwell Review of Grove’s Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory (Oct. 2, 2019), https://yalejreg.com/nc/my-jotwell-review-of-groves- presidential-laws-and-the-missing-interpretive-theory/ Discussed Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

Article featured in Christopher Walker, I’m Just a Presidential Directive, JOTWELL (Sept. 27, 2019) (reviewing Tara Leigh Grove, Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020), available at SSRN), https://adlaw.jotwell.com/im-just-a-presidential-directive/ Featured Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

Essay mentioned in Joseph D. Kearney, Public Views of the Supreme Court: A Marquette Law School Poll and Conference (Sept. 23, 2019), https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2019/09/public-views-of-the-u-s- supreme-court-a-marquette-law-school-poll-and-conference/ Mentioned The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Quoted in James Rowley, House Loses Bid to Defend Female Circumcision Statute on Appeal, BLOOMBERG GOVERNMENT (Sept. 16, 2019)

Quoted in Adam Liptak & Alicia Parlapiano, A Term Marked by Shifting Alliances and Surprise Votes, N.Y. TIMES, at 26 (June 30, 2019)

Article discussed in Michael Solimine, State Courts as Forums for Federal Partisan Gerrymandering Claims after Common Cause v. Rucho, Election Law Blog: Rucho Symposium (June 30, 2019) Discussed The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine, 90 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1908 (2015)

Quoted in Adam Liptak & Alicia Parlapiano, A Supreme Court Term Marked by Shifting Alliances and Surprise Votes, N.Y. TIMES (June 29, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/29/us/supreme-court- decisions.html

Essay discussed in Adam Liptak, Roberts Is the New Swing Vote and Neither Party is Pleased, N.Y. TIMES, at A1, A15 (June 28, 2019) Discussed The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

MEDIA (CONT.)

Article discussed in Will Baude, Can Federal Partisan Gerrymandering Claims be Brought in State Court?, Reason: The Volokh Conspiracy (June 28, 2019), https://reason.com/2019/06/28/can-federal-partisan- gerrymandering-claims-be-brought-in-state-court/ Discussed and linked to The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine, 90 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1908 (2015)

Essay discussed in Adam Liptak, After 14 Years, Chief Justice Roberts Takes Charge, N.Y. TIMES (June 27, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/chief-justice-roberts.html Discussed and linked to The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Essay discussed in Amanda Frost, Academic highlight: Fallon on “Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court”, SCOTUSblog (June 7, 2019), https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/academic-highlight-fallon-on- law-and-legitimacy-in-the-supreme-court/ Discussed and linked to The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Quoted in James Rowley, Genital Mutilation Case in Michigan Tests Court Role of Congress, BLOOMBERG GOVERNMENT (June 5, 2019), https://about.bgov.com/news/genital-mutilation-case-in-michigan-tests-court- role-of-congress

Quoted in and essay discussed in Aubrey Neal, Congress and the Judiciary: The top 3 takeaways from a discussion on what the House and Senate can do to fix the courts, R-STREET (May 16, 2019), https://www.rstreet.org/2019/05/16/congress-and-the-judiciary-the-top-3-takeaways-from-a-discussion-on- what-the-house-and-senate-can-do-to-fix-the-courts/ Discussed and linked to The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr., LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Essay featured in Panel: “Congress and the Judiciary: What the House and Senate Can Do to Fix the Courts” (May 14, 2019), https://mobile.twitter.com/RSI/status/1128329983485718529 Discussed The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Dilemma, 132 HARV. L. REV. 2240 (2019) (invited essay) (reviewing RICHARD H. FALLON, Jr. LAW AND LEGITIMACY IN THE SUPREME COURT (2018))

Quoted in Bart Jansen, President Donald Trump tees up the strangest test yet of executive privilege, USA TODAY (May 15, 2019), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/15/president-donald-trump- executive-privilege-fight-congress/1170333001/

Article highlighted in Chris Walker, Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, March 2019 Edition, Notice and Comment: A Blog from the Yale Journal on Law and Regulation and the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice (April 30, 2019), https://yalejreg.com/nc/administrative-law- ssrn-reading-list-march-2019-edition/ Highlighted Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

MEDIA (CONT.)

Article highlighted in Michael Ramsey, Tara Leigh Grove: Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, The Originalism Blog (March 15, 2019), https://originalismblog.typepad.com/the-originalismblog/2019/03/tara-leigh-grove-presidential-laws-and-the-missing-interpretive-theorymichael-ramsey.html Highlighted Presidential Laws and the Missing Interpretive Theory, 168 U. PA. L. REV. 877 (2020)

Quoted in Andrew Seidman, Should Pa. sue Trump over national emergency declaration? Democratic states are split, THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER (Feb. 20, 2019), https://www.philly.com/news/trump-national- emergency-pa-josh-shapiro-lawsuit-20190220.html

Quoted in David Schultz, Blue Wave Roils Environmental Lawsuits as States Turn to Courts, BLOOMBERG ENVIRONMENT (Jan. 8, 2019), https://news.bloombergenvironment.com/environment-and-energy/blue- wave-roils-environmental-lawsuits-as-states-turn-to-courts

Featured in “Judicial Independence and the Federal Courts: A Historical Perspective,” National Constitution Center Podcast: Live at America’s Town Hall (posted Jan. 1, 2019), https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/national-constitution-center/live-at-americas-town-hall/e/57965356 Discussed The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018)

Article featured in Emma Cueto, Trump Unlikely To Defy ‘So-Called Judges,’ Prof Argues, LAW360 (Dec. 7, 2018), https://www.law360.com/articles/1109101/print?section=legalethics Featured The Power of “So-Called Judges,” 93 N.Y.U. L. REV. ONLINE 14 (2018) (invited essay: Symposium on “Courts Under Pressure: Protecting Rule of Law in the Age of Trump”)

Article discussed in Jakob Stalnaker, Do State Legislators have Standing to Appeal a District Court Racial Gerrymandering Ruling?, State of Elections: William & Mary Election Law Society (Dec. 4, 2018), http://electls.blogs.wm.edu/2018/12/04/state-legislators-standing-appeal-district-court-racial- gerrymandering-ruling/ Discussed Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Quoted and article mentioned in Lydia Wheeler, Democrats in murky legal water with Whitaker lawsuits, THE HILL (Nov. 13, 2018), https://thehill.com/regulation/416538-democrats-in-murky-legal-water-with- whitaker-lawsuits Mentioned Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Quoted and article mentioned in Russell Berman, Democrats Quickly Confront the Limits of Their Power to Stop Trump, THE ATLANTIC (Nov. 9, 2018), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/11/democrats-vow-investigate-trumps-firing- sessions/575380/?utm_source=feed Linked to Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Quoted in Zoe Tillman, Republicans Scored Victories Investigating The Obama Administration. Now They May Wish They Hadn’t., BUZZFEED NEWS (Nov. 7, 2018), https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/republicans-obama-era-court-wins-could-come-back- to-haunt

MEDIA (CONT.)

Quoted in Melissa Heelan Stanzione, Kavanaugh Saga Amplifies Call for Supreme Court Term Limits, BLOOMBERG LAW (Oct. 13, 2018), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/kavanaugh-saga-amplifies-call-for-supreme-court-term-limits

Featured in “Conference Call: Defending America’s Courts” (Oct. 11, 2018), Business Forward, https://www.businessfwd.org/events/conference-call-defending-americas-courts/

Quoted in Melissa Heelan Stanzione, Adding More Justices to High Court Could Undermine Its Legitimacy, BLOOMBERG LAW (Oct. 9, 2018), https://biglawbusiness.com/adding-more-justices-to-high-court-could- undermine-its-legitimacy/

Article highlighted in Chris Walker, Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, April 2018 Edition, Notice and Comment: A Blog from the Yale Journal on Law and Regulation and the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice (May 28, 2018), https://yalejreg.com/nc/administrative-law-ssrn-reading-list- april-2018-edition/ Highlighted Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Quoted in Terry Carter, The executive branch pushes the boundaries of the separation of powers, ABA JOURNAL (Apr. 2018), http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/imbalance_of_power_executive_branch

Article highlighted in Akis Psygkas, Scholarship: New Articles on Administrative Law and Regulation: Comparative Administrative Law Blog (March 20, 2018), https://campuspress.yale.edu/compadlaw/tag/new-scholarship-series/ Highlighted Government Standing and the Fallacy of Institutional Injury, 167 U. PA. L. REV. 611 (2019)

Speech discussed in Tyler Good-Cohn, Tara Grove and Judicial Independence in the Era of Trump, American Constitution Society: Harvard Law School Chapter (Oct. 30, 2017), https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/acs/2017/10/30/tara-grove-and-judicial-independence-in-the-era-of-trump/

Quoted in Julia Harte, Democratic lawmakers sue Trump over foreign state payments to businesses, REUTERS (June 14, 2017), http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-lawsuit-idUSKBN1950AW?il=0

Article featured in Marin Levy, Rethinking Judicial Independence, JOTWELL (June 5, 2017) (reviewing Tara Leigh Grove, The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018), http://courtslaw.jotwell.com/rethinking-judicial-independence Featured The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018)

Article selected as Download of the Week, LEGAL THEORY BLOG (edited by Lawrence Solum) (May 13, 2017), http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2017/05/download-of-the-week-the-origins-and-fragility-of- judicial-independence-by-grove.html Selected The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465 (2018)

Quoted in Erik Larsen, David Voreacos, & Kartikay Mehrotra, Virginia Judge Tees Up Travel Ban Argument for Top Court, BLOOMBERG POLITICS (March 24, 2017), https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ articles/2017-03-24/trump-travel-ban-upheld-but-previous-rulings-blocking-it-remain

MEDIA (CONT.)

Quoted in Greg Stohr & David Voreacos, Fixing Trump Executive Order’s Legal Problems Is No Easy Task, BLOOMBERG POLITICS (Feb. 11, 2017), https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02- 11/fixing-trump-executive-order-s-legal-problems-is-no-easy-task

Article discussed in Michael Stern, Coleman v. Miller and the Political Question Doctrine, Point of Order: A Discussion of Congressional Legal Issues (Sept. 16, 2016), http://www.pointoforder.com/2016/09/16/coleman-v-miller-and-the-political-question-doctrine/ Discussed The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine, 90 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1908 (2015)

Quoted in “The Political Thicket” (June 9, 2016), Radiolab Supreme Court Podcast, More Perfect, National Public Radio, WNYC, http://www.wnyc.org/story/the-political-thicket/

Quoted in and article mentioned in Adam Liptak, Focus Is on the Chief Justice as Court Hears Immigration Case, N.Y. TIMES, at A1 (April 18, 2016): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/18/us/politics/focus-on-chief- justice-as-supreme-court-hears-immigration-challenge.html Linked to When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Article discussed in Amanda Frost, Academic Highlight: State standing and United States v. Texas, SCOTUSblog (April 14, 2016), http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/04/academic-highlight-state-standing-and- united-states-v-texas/ Discussed When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Article discussed in Seth Davis, Standing in the DAPA Case, PrawfsBlawg (March 8, 2016), http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2016/03/standin.html Discussed When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Article highlighted in Chris Walker, Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, November 2015 Edition, Notice and Comment: A Blog from the Yale Journal on Law and Regulation and the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice (Dec. 17, 2015), http://www.yalejreg.com/blog/administrative- law-ssrn-reading-list-november-2015-edition-by-chris-walker Highlighted When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Article featured as Immigration Article of the Day: When Can a State Sue the United States (Nov. 13, 2015), https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2015/11/immigration-article-of-the-day-.html Highlighted When Can a State Sue the United States?, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 851 (2016)

Article featured in Jonathan H. Adler, Opinion: Scholarship on congressional standing (and a prediction), WASH. POST (Sept. 10, 2015), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh- conspiracy/wp/2015/09/10/scholarship-on-congressional-standing-and-a-prediction/ Highlighted Congress’s (Limited) Power to Represent Itself in Court, 99 CORNELL L. REV. 571 (2014) (with Neal Devins)

Quoted in Mark Sherman, Questions on Plaintiffs Unlikely to Derail Health Lawsuit, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 14, 2015), http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/02/14/us/politics/ap-us-supreme-court-health-overhaul.html ◼ Associated Press article also carried by other media outlets, including The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle, The Miami Herald, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The Huffington Post, ABC News, FOX News, CNBC, and the Richmond Times-Dispatch 26

MEDIA (CONT.)

Quoted in Michael R. Crittenden & Colleen McCain Nelson, House Authorizes Boehner to Sue President, WALL STREET JOURNAL, at A4 (July 31, 2014), http://online.wsj.com/articles/house-votes-to-authorize- boehner-to-sue-obama-1406760762

Quoted in David G. Savage, Why experts see little hope for GOP plan to sue Obama over law’s delay, LOS ANGELES TIMES (July 19, 2014), http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-house-lawsuit-20140720- story.html#page=1

Quoted in Pema Levy, What If Boehner Wins His Lawsuit Against Obama?, NEWSWEEK (July 15, 2014), http://www.newsweek.com/what-if-boehner-wins-his-lawsuit-against-obama-259016

Quoted in Jacob Gershman, Hurdles Lie Ahead For Boehner Lawsuit, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, at A4 (July 3, 2014) http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB20001424052702304628604580005541077207082

Quoted in Stephanie Condon, Boehner v. Obama: House lawsuit brings new twist to familiar conflict, CBS NEWS (July 3, 2014), http://www.cbsnews.com/news/boehner-v-obama-house-lawsuit-brings-new-twist-to- familiar-conflict/

Quoted in Aliyah Frumin, Experts scoff at Boehner’s legal threats against Obama, MSNBC (July 7, 2014), http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/legal-experts-scoff-over-boehners-legal-threats-against-obama

Quoted in Jacob Gershman, Boehner Lawsuit Against Obama Administration Has Hurdles to Clear, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (July 2, 2014), http://online.wsj.com/articles/boehner-lawsuit-against-obama- administration-has-hurdles-to-clear-1404345609

Quoted in Jacob Gershman, A Legal Preview of House v. Obama, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL LAW BLOG (July 2, 2014), http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/07/02/a-legal-preview-of-house-v-obama/

Article selected as Download of the Week, LEGAL THEORY BLOG (edited by Lawrence Solum) (Dec. 7, 2013), http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2013/12/download-of-the-week.html Selected Standing Outside of Article III, 162 U. PA. L. REV. 1311 (2014)

Quoted in Dylan Scott, What the Supreme Court’s Prop. 8 Ruling Means for Voter-Approved Laws, GOVERNING MAGAZINE (June 26, 2013), http://www.governing.com/blogs/fedwatch/gov-what-the-supreme- courts-prop-8-standing-ruling-means.html

Neal Devins & Tara Grove, Commentary on marriage grants: Article III & same-sex marriage, SCOTUSblog (Dec. 8, 2012), http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/12/commentary-on-marriage-grants-article- iii-same-sex-marriage/

Article discussed in Amanda Frost, Academic Highlight, SCOTUSblog (May 4, 2012), http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/05/academic-highlight/ Discussed The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard, 113 COLUM. L. REV. 929 (2013)

BAR

Member of the Virginia Bar. Admitted as a government attorney to practice in the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits.