DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Introductory Geometry Terminology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Introductory Geometry Terminology MAT104: Fundamentals of Mathematics II Introductory Geometry Terminology Summary Section 11-1: Basic Notions Undefined Terms: Point; Line; Plane Collinear Points: points that lie on the same line Between[-ness]: exactly what the term implies with regard to points [Line] Segment: part of a line consisting of (and named by) two endpoints and all points between them Closed Segment: segment with two included endpoints Half-Open Segment: segment with one included endpoint (also called Half-Closed Segment) Open Segment: segment with no included endpoints Ray: part of a line consisting of one endpoint, a second unique point on the line, all points between them, and all points that have the aforementioned second point between them and the endpoint Half-Line: part of a line on one side of a point on the line (does not include the point) Coplanar: lying on the same plane (points, lines, or parts of lines) Noncoplanar: not coplanar Intersecting Lines: lines with exactly one point in common Skew Lines: lines that cannot be contained in a single plane Concurrent Lines: three or more lines that intersect in the same point Coinciding Lines: identical lines; lines intersecting at every point Parallel Lines: either: a) nonintersecting coplanar lines; or b) two lines that are actually the same line (any line is parallel to itself; coinciding lines as defined above); symbol is Intersecting Planes: planes with exactly one line in common Coinciding Planes: identical planes; planes intersecting at every line Parallel Planes: either: a) nonintersecting planes; or b) two planes that are actually the same plane (any plane is parallel to itself; coinciding planes as defined above) Parallel Line and Plane: a line and plane that either: a) do not intersect in any point; or b) intersect in every point on the line Half-Plane: part of a plane on one side of a line in the plane (does not include the line) Prof. Fowler Axiom: a statement universally known to be factual but not able to be proven Axiom 1: There is exactly one line that contains any two distinct points. Axiom 2: If two points lie in a plane, then the line containing the points lies in the plane. Axiom 3: There is exactly one plane that contains any three distinct noncollinear points. Axiom 4: If two distinct planes intersect, then their intersection is a line. Axiom 5: A line and a point not on the line determine a unique plane. Axiom 6: Two distinct parallel lines determine a unique plane. Axiom 7: Two distinct intersecting lines determine a unique plane. Theorem: statement proven true based on given information, undefined terms, definitions, axioms, and previously proven theorems Angle: the union of two rays with a common endpoint and all points between the rays Sides of an Angle: the rays that form the angle Vertex of an Angle: the common endpoint of the rays that form the angle Interior of an Angle: all points between the rays that form the angle Adjacent Angles: angles with a common vertex, a common side, and nonoverlapping interiors Protractor: tool used to measure an angle Degree: unit used to measure angles; 1/360 of a circle; symbol is Minute: 1/60 of a degree; symbol is ( ) Second: 1/60 of a minute; symbol is ( ) Zero Angle: angle measuring ; formed by coinciding rays (rays with the same endpoint and going in the same direction, thus forming a single ray) Acute Angle: angle measuring between and Right Angle: angle measuring exactly Obtuse Angle: angle measure between and Straight Angle: angle measuring exactly ; formed by opposite rays (rays with the same endpoint and going in opposite directions, thus forming a line) Reflex Angle: angle measuring between and Complementary Angles: degree measures add up to Supplementary Angles: degree measures add up to Prof. Fowler Circle: set of all points equidistant from a given point called the center (does not include the interior) Arc: a continuous part of a circle Chord: a segment with both endpoints on a circle Diameter: 1) a chord containing the center of the circle in which it is constructed 2) the length of the chord containing the center of the circle in which it is constructed Central Angle: an angle with its vertex at the center of a circle (Note: the measure of an arc is equal to the measure of the central angle by which it is determined.) Minor Arc: an arc measuring less than Major Arc: an arc measuring between and Semicircle: an arc with its endpoints coinciding with the endpoints of a diameter of the circle Perpendicular Lines: lines intersecting at a angle; symbol is Line Perpendicular to a Plane: a line not in the plane that is perpendicular to every line in the plane passing through its point of intersection with the plane Dihedral Angle: the [smallest] angle formed between two planes Perpendicular Planes: planes with a dihedral angle measuring Prof. Fowler Section 11-3: Curves, Polygons, and Symmetry Connected Drawing: a figure that can be constructed without lifting the writing implement Curve: any connected drawing; can contain or consist exclusively of straight segments Simple Curve: a curve that does not intersect itself Closed Curve: a curve with the same starting and stopping point Polygon: a simple closed curve consisting of only line segments called its sides (does not include the interior); named by the number of sides as listed below Henagon: 1 side (also called a Monogon; degenerate case in Euclidean Geometry: a point) Digon: 2 sides (degenerate case in Euclidean Geometry: a line segment) Triangle: 3 sides (also called a Trigon) Quadrilateral: 4 sides (also called a Tetragon) Pentagon: 5 sides Hexagon: 6 sides Heptagon: 7 sides (also called a Septagon) Octagon: 8 sides Nonagon: 9 sides (also called an Enneagon) Decagon: 10 sides Hendecagon: 11 sides (also called an Undecagon) Dodecagon: 12 sides Icosagon: 20 sides Hectogon: 100 sides Chiliagon: 1000 sides Myriagon: 10,000 sides Megagon: 1,000,000 sides Googolgon: googol sides Apeirogon: infinite number of sides (degenerate case in Euclidean Geometry: a circle) n-gon: n sides; replace n with the actual number of sides (e.g., 15-gon) Convex Curve: a simple closed curve such that the segment connecting any two points in its interior is completely contained in its interior Concave Curve: a simple closed curve that is not convex Polygonal Region: the union of a polygon and its interior Vertex of a Polygon: the common endpoint of any two consecutive sides of the polygon [Interior] Angle of a Polygon: an angle formed by consecutive sides of a polygon with its interior being inside the polygon Exterior Angle of a Polygon: an angle formed by one side of a polygon and the extension of a contiguous side of the polygon with its interior being outside the polygon Prof. Fowler Diagonal: any segment connecting nonconsecutive vertices of a polygon Congruent Figures: figures with the same size (measure) and shape Equiangular Polygons: polygons with congruent interior angles in order Equilateral Polygons: polygons with congruent sides in order Regular Polygon: a polygon with all sides congruent in order and all interior angles congruent in order Right Triangle: a triangle with one right angle Acute Triangle: a triangle with all three angles being acute angles Obtuse Triangle: a triangle with one obtuse angle Scalene Triangle: a triangle with no sides (or angles) congruent Isosceles Triangle: a triangle with [at least] two sides congruent Equilateral Triangle: a triangle with all three sides (and angles) congruent Trapezoid: a quadrilateral with [at least] one pair of parallel sides Kite: a quadrilateral with two distinct pairs of adjacent sides congruent Isosceles Trapezoid: a trapezoid with congruent base angles (angles formed at opposite ends of one of the parallel sides) Parallelogram: a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides Rectangle: a quadrilateral with four right angles Rhombus: a quadrilateral with all four sides congruent Square: a quadrilateral with four right angles and all four sides congruent Hierarchy among Quadrilaterals: Page 669 Line of Symmetry: a line through which a figure is its own image when folded along it (also called a reflecting line) Rotational Symmetry: property of a figure indicated by the ability to rotate the figure less than about its center such that it coincides with itself (also called Turn Symmetry) (note: the smallest degree measure through which the figure can be turned to coincide with itself is the properly reported measure of the rotational symmetry of the figure, although multiple degree measures may exist) Point Symmetry: property of a figure indicated by the possession of rotational symmetry Prof. Fowler .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vertex-Transplants on a Convex Polyhedron
    CCCG 2020, Saskatoon, Canada, August 5{7, 2020 Vertex-Transplants on a Convex Polyhedron Joseph O'Rourke Abstract Regular Tetrahedron. Let the four vertices of a regu- lar tetrahedron of unit edge length be v1; v2; v3 forming Given any convex polyhedron P of sufficiently many ver- the base, and apex v0. Place a point x on the v3v0 edge, tices n, and with no vertex's curvature greater than π, close to v3. Then one can form a digon starting from x it is possible to cut out a vertex, and paste the excised and surrounding v0 with geodesics γ1 and γ2 to a point y portion elsewhere along a vertex-to-vertex geodesic, cre- on 4v1v2v0, with jγ1j = jγ2j = 1. See Fig. 1(a,b). This ating a new convex polyhedron P0 of n + 2 vertices. digon can then be cut out and its hole sutured closed. The removed digon surface can be folded to a doubly covered triangle, and pasted into edge v1v2. The re- 1 Introduction sulting convex polyhedron guaranteed by Alexandrov's Theorem is a 6-vertex irregular octahedron P0. The goal of this paper is to prove the following theorem: Theorem 1 For any convex polyhedron P of n > N vertices, none of which have curvature greater than π, there is a vertex v0 that can be cut out along a digon of geodesics, and the excised surface glued to a geodesic on P connecting two vertices v1; v2. The result is a new convex polyhedron P0 with n + 2 vertices. N = 16 suffices.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygon Review and Puzzlers in the Above, Those Are Names to the Polygons: Fill in the Blank Parts. Names: Number of Sides
    Polygon review and puzzlers ÆReview to the classification of polygons: Is it a Polygon? Polygons are 2-dimensional shapes. They are made of straight lines, and the shape is "closed" (all the lines connect up). Polygon Not a Polygon Not a Polygon (straight sides) (has a curve) (open, not closed) Regular polygons have equal length sides and equal interior angles. Polygons are named according to their number of sides. Name of Degree of Degree of triangle total angles regular angles Triangle 180 60 In the above, those are names to the polygons: Quadrilateral 360 90 fill in the blank parts. Pentagon Hexagon Heptagon 900 129 Names: number of sides: Octagon Nonagon hendecagon, 11 dodecagon, _____________ Decagon 1440 144 tetradecagon, 13 hexadecagon, 15 Do you see a pattern in the calculation of the heptadecagon, _____________ total degree of angles of the polygon? octadecagon, _____________ --- (n -2) x 180° enneadecagon, _____________ icosagon 20 pentadecagon, _____________ These summation of angles rules, also apply to the irregular polygons, try it out yourself !!! A point where two or more straight lines meet. Corner. Example: a corner of a polygon (2D) or of a polyhedron (3D) as shown. The plural of vertex is "vertices” Test them out yourself, by drawing diagonals on the polygons. Here are some fun polygon riddles; could you come up with the answer? Geometry polygon riddles I: My first is in shape and also in space; My second is in line and also in place; My third is in point and also in line; My fourth in operation but not in sign; My fifth is in angle but not in degree; My sixth is in glide but not symmetry; Geometry polygon riddles II: I am a polygon all my angles have the same measure all my five sides have the same measure, what general shape am I? Geometry polygon riddles III: I am a polygon.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of N-Sided Regular Polygons
    PROPERTIES OF N-SIDED REGULAR POLYGONS When students are first exposed to regular polygons in middle school, they learn their properties by looking at individual examples such as the equilateral triangles(n=3), squares(n=4), and hexagons(n=6). A generalization is usually not given, although it would be straight forward to do so with just a min imum of trigonometry and algebra. It also would help students by showing how one obtains generalization in mathematics. We show here how to carry out such a generalization for regular polynomials of side length s. Our starting point is the following schematic of an n sided polygon- We see from the figure that any regular n sided polygon can be constructed by looking at n isosceles triangles whose base angles are θ=(1-2/n)(π/2) since the vertex angle of the triangle is just ψ=2π/n, when expressed in radians. The area of the grey triangle in the above figure is- 2 2 ATr=sh/2=(s/2) tan(θ)=(s/2) tan[(1-2/n)(π/2)] so that the total area of any n sided regular convex polygon will be nATr, , with s again being the side-length. With this generalized form we can construct the following table for some of the better known regular polygons- Name Number of Base Angle, Non-Dimensional 2 sides, n θ=(π/2)(1-2/n) Area, 4nATr/s =tan(θ) Triangle 3 π/6=30º 1/sqrt(3) Square 4 π/4=45º 1 Pentagon 5 3π/10=54º sqrt(15+20φ) Hexagon 6 π/3=60º sqrt(3) Octagon 8 3π/8=67.5º 1+sqrt(2) Decagon 10 2π/5=72º 10sqrt(3+4φ) Dodecagon 12 5π/12=75º 144[2+sqrt(3)] Icosagon 20 9π/20=81º 20[2φ+sqrt(3+4φ)] Here φ=[1+sqrt(5)]/2=1.618033989… is the well known Golden Ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulas Involving Polygons - Lesson 7-3
    you are here > Class Notes – Chapter 7 – Lesson 7-3 Formulas Involving Polygons - Lesson 7-3 Here’s today’s warmup…don’t forget to “phone home!” B Given: BD bisects ∠PBQ PD ⊥ PB QD ⊥ QB M Prove: BD is ⊥ bis. of PQ P Q D Statements Reasons Honors Geometry Notes Today, we started by learning how polygons are classified by their number of sides...you should already know a lot of these - just make sure to memorize the ones you don't know!! Sides Name 3 Triangle 4 Quadrilateral 5 Pentagon 6 Hexagon 7 Heptagon 8 Octagon 9 Nonagon 10 Decagon 11 Undecagon 12 Dodecagon 13 Tridecagon 14 Tetradecagon 15 Pentadecagon 16 Hexadecagon 17 Heptadecagon 18 Octadecagon 19 Enneadecagon 20 Icosagon n n-gon Baroody Page 2 of 6 Honors Geometry Notes Next, let’s look at the diagonals of polygons with different numbers of sides. By drawing as many diagonals as we could from one diagonal, you should be able to see a pattern...we can make n-2 triangles in a n-sided polygon. Given this information and the fact that the sum of the interior angles of a polygon is 180°, we can come up with a theorem that helps us to figure out the sum of the measures of the interior angles of any n-sided polygon! Baroody Page 3 of 6 Honors Geometry Notes Next, let’s look at exterior angles in a polygon. First, consider the exterior angles of a pentagon as shown below: Note that the sum of the exterior angles is 360°.
    [Show full text]
  • An FPT Algorithm for the Embeddability of Graphs Into Two-Dimensional Simplicial Complexes∗
    An FPT Algorithm for the Embeddability of Graphs into Two-Dimensional Simplicial Complexes∗ Éric Colin de Verdière† Thomas Magnard‡ Abstract We consider the embeddability problem of a graph G into a two-dimensional simplicial com- plex C: Given G and C, decide whether G admits a topological embedding into C. The problem is NP-hard, even in the restricted case where C is homeomorphic to a surface. It is known that the problem admits an algorithm with running time f(c)nO(c), where n is the size of the graph G and c is the size of the two-dimensional complex C. In other words, that algorithm is polynomial when C is fixed, but the degree of the polynomial depends on C. We prove that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable in the size of the two-dimensional complex, by providing a deterministic f(c)n3-time algorithm. We also provide a randomized algorithm with O(1) expected running time 2c nO(1). Our approach is to reduce to the case where G has bounded branchwidth via an irrelevant vertex method, and to apply dynamic programming. We do not rely on any component of the existing linear-time algorithms for embedding graphs on a fixed surface; the only elaborated tool that we use is an algorithm to compute grid minors. 1 Introduction An embedding of a graph G into a host topological space X is a crossing-free topological drawing of G into X. The use and computation of graph embeddings is central in the communities of computational topology, topological graph theory, and graph drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Octagonal Pets by Richard Evan Schwartz
    The Octagonal PETs by Richard Evan Schwartz 1 Contents 1 Introduction 11 1.1 WhatisaPET?.......................... 11 1.2 SomeExamples .......................... 12 1.3 GoalsoftheMonograph . 13 1.4 TheOctagonalPETs . 14 1.5 TheMainTheorem: Renormalization . 15 1.6 CorollariesofTheMainTheorem . 17 1.6.1 StructureoftheTiling . 17 1.6.2 StructureoftheLimitSet . 18 1.6.3 HyperbolicSymmetry . 21 1.7 PolygonalOuterBilliards. 22 1.8 TheAlternatingGridSystem . 24 1.9 ComputerAssists ......................... 26 1.10Organization ........................... 28 2 Background 29 2.1 LatticesandFundamentalDomains . 29 2.2 Hyperplanes............................ 30 2.3 ThePETCategory ........................ 31 2.4 PeriodicTilesforPETs. 32 2.5 TheLimitSet........................... 34 2.6 SomeHyperbolicGeometry . 35 2.7 ContinuedFractions . 37 2.8 SomeAnalysis........................... 39 I FriendsoftheOctagonalPETs 40 3 Multigraph PETs 41 3.1 TheAbstractConstruction. 41 3.2 TheReflectionLemma . 43 3.3 ConstructingMultigraphPETs . 44 3.4 PlanarExamples ......................... 45 3.5 ThreeDimensionalExamples . 46 3.6 HigherDimensionalGeneralizations . 47 2 4 TheAlternatingGridSystem 48 4.1 BasicDefinitions ......................... 48 4.2 CompactifyingtheGenerators . 50 4.3 ThePETStructure........................ 52 4.4 CharacterizingthePET . 54 4.5 AMoreSymmetricPicture. 55 4.5.1 CanonicalCoordinates . 55 4.5.2 TheDoubleFoliation . 56 4.5.3 TheOctagonalPETs . 57 4.6 UnboundedOrbits ........................ 57 4.7 TheComplexOctagonalPETs. 58 4.7.1 ComplexCoordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrie Schemes
    Canad. J. Math. Vol. 57 (4), 2005 pp. 844–870 Petrie Schemes Gordon Williams Abstract. Petrie polygons, especially as they arise in the study of regular polytopes and Coxeter groups, have been studied by geometers and group theorists since the early part of the twentieth century. An open question is the determination of which polyhedra possess Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. The current work explores combinatorial structures in abstract polytopes, called Petrie schemes, that generalize the notion of a Petrie polygon. It is established that all of the regular convex polytopes and honeycombs in Euclidean spaces, as well as all of the Grunbaum–Dress¨ polyhedra, pos- sess Petrie schemes that are not self-intersecting and thus have Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. Partial results are obtained for several other classes of less symmetric polytopes. 1 Introduction Historically, polyhedra have been conceived of either as closed surfaces (usually topo- logical spheres) made up of planar polygons joined edge to edge or as solids enclosed by such a surface. In recent times, mathematicians have considered polyhedra to be convex polytopes, simplicial spheres, or combinatorial structures such as abstract polytopes or incidence complexes. A Petrie polygon of a polyhedron is a sequence of edges of the polyhedron where any two consecutive elements of the sequence have a vertex and face in common, but no three consecutive edges share a commonface. For the regular polyhedra, the Petrie polygons form the equatorial skew polygons. Petrie polygons may be defined analogously for polytopes as well. Petrie polygons have been very useful in the study of polyhedra and polytopes, especially regular polytopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1812.02806V3 [Math.GT] 27 Jun 2019 Sphere Formed by the Triangles Bounds a Ball and the Vertex in the Identification Space Looks Like the Centre of a Ball
    TRAVERSING THREE-MANIFOLD TRIANGULATIONS AND SPINES J. HYAM RUBINSTEIN, HENRY SEGERMAN AND STEPHAN TILLMANN Abstract. A celebrated result concerning triangulations of a given closed 3–manifold is that any two triangulations with the same number of vertices are connected by a sequence of so-called 2-3 and 3-2 moves. A similar result is known for ideal triangulations of topologically finite non-compact 3–manifolds. These results build on classical work that goes back to Alexander, Newman, Moise, and Pachner. The key special case of 1–vertex triangulations of closed 3–manifolds was independently proven by Matveev and Piergallini. The general result for closed 3–manifolds can be found in work of Benedetti and Petronio, and Amendola gives a proof for topologically finite non-compact 3–manifolds. These results (and their proofs) are phrased in the dual language of spines. The purpose of this note is threefold. We wish to popularise Amendola’s result; we give a combined proof for both closed and non-compact manifolds that emphasises the dual viewpoints of triangulations and spines; and we give a proof replacing a key general position argument due to Matveev with a more combinatorial argument inspired by the theory of subdivisions. 1. Introduction Suppose you have a finite number of triangles. If you identify edges in pairs such that no edge remains unglued, then the resulting identification space looks locally like a plane and one obtains a closed surface, a two-dimensional manifold without boundary. The classification theorem for surfaces, which has its roots in work of Camille Jordan and August Möbius in the 1860s, states that each closed surface is topologically equivalent to a sphere with some number of handles or crosscaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs
    Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs George Olshevsky TETRACOMB is a four-dimensional tessellation. In any tessellation, the honeycells, which are the n-dimensional polytopes that tessellate the space, Amust by definition adjoin precisely along their facets, that is, their ( n!1)- dimensional elements, so that each facet belongs to exactly two honeycells. In the case of tetracombs, the honeycells are four-dimensional polytopes, or polychora, and their facets are polyhedra. For a tessellation to be uniform, the honeycells must all be uniform polytopes, and the vertices must be transitive on the symmetry group of the tessellation. Loosely speaking, therefore, the vertices must be “surrounded all alike” by the honeycells that meet there. If a tessellation is such that every point of its space not on a boundary between honeycells lies in the interior of exactly one honeycell, then it is panoploid. If one or more points of the space not on a boundary between honeycells lie inside more than one honeycell, the tessellation is polyploid. Tessellations may also be constructed that have “holes,” that is, regions that lie inside none of the honeycells; such tessellations are called holeycombs. It is possible for a polyploid tessellation to also be a holeycomb, but not for a panoploid tessellation, which must fill the entire space exactly once. Polyploid tessellations are also called starcombs or star-tessellations. Holeycombs usually arise when (n!1)-dimensional tessellations are themselves permitted to be honeycells; these take up the otherwise free facets that bound the “holes,” so that all the facets continue to belong to two honeycells. In this essay, as per its title, we are concerned with just the uniform panoploid tetracombs.
    [Show full text]
  • Locating Diametral Points
    Results Math (2020) 75:68 Online First c 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG Results in Mathematics https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-020-01193-5 Locating Diametral Points Jin-ichi Itoh, Costin Vˆılcu, Liping Yuan , and Tudor Zamfirescu Abstract. Let K be a convex body in Rd,withd =2, 3. We determine sharp sufficient conditions for a set E composed of 1, 2, or 3 points of bdK, to contain at least one endpoint of a diameter of K.Weextend this also to convex surfaces, with their intrinsic metric. Our conditions are upper bounds on the sum of the complete angles at the points in E. We also show that such criteria do not exist for n ≥ 4points. Mathematics Subject Classification. 52A10, 52A15, 53C45. Keywords. Convex body, diameter, geodesic diameter, diametral point. 1. Introduction The tangent cone at a point x in the boundary bdK of a convex body K can be defined using only neighborhoods of x in bdK. So, one doesn’t normally expect to get global information about K from the size of the tangent cones at one, two or three points. Nevertheless, in some cases this is what happens! A convex body K in Rd is a compact convex set with interior points; we shall consider only the cases d =2, 3. A convex surface in R3 is the boundary of a convex body in R3. Let S be a convex surface and x apointinS. Consider homothetic dilations of S with the centre at x and coefficients of homothety tending to infinity. The limit surface is called the tangent cone at x (see [1]), and is denoted by Tx.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Shape and Space
    Volume 2 Shape and Space Colin Foster Introduction Teachers are busy people, so I’ll be brief. Let me tell you what this book isn’t. • It isn’t a book you have to make time to read; it’s a book that will save you time. Take it into the classroom and use ideas from it straight away. Anything requiring preparation or equipment (e.g., photocopies, scissors, an overhead projector, etc.) begins with the word “NEED” in bold followed by the details. • It isn’t a scheme of work, and it isn’t even arranged by age or pupil “level”. Many of the ideas can be used equally well with pupils at different ages and stages. Instead the items are simply arranged by topic. (There is, however, an index at the back linking the “key objectives” from the Key Stage 3 Framework to the sections in these three volumes.) The three volumes cover Number and Algebra (1), Shape and Space (2) and Probability, Statistics, Numeracy and ICT (3). • It isn’t a book of exercises or worksheets. Although you’re welcome to photocopy anything you wish, photocopying is expensive and very little here needs to be photocopied for pupils. Most of the material is intended to be presented by the teacher orally or on the board. Answers and comments are given on the right side of most of the pages or sometimes on separate pages as explained. This is a book to make notes in. Cross out anything you don’t like or would never use. Add in your own ideas or references to other resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits
    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
    [Show full text]