The Social Landscape, and the Interdependency of Landscape and Social Understanding (David and Thomas 2008:33)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The Gendered Landscape A discussion on gender, status and power expressed in the Viking Age mortuary landscape Marianne Moen Masters dissertation in Archaeology Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History (IAKH) Faculty of Humanities University of Oslo Spring 2010 2 Table of Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT – AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................ 5 1.2 MORTUARY EVIDENCE .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 GENDER AND MORTUARY EVIDENCE – A PAST POPULATED BY MEN? ........................................................... 8 1.4 GENDER EXPRESSED IN THE LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................. 12 1.5 AN OUTLINE OF WHAT IS TO FOLLOW ....................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 16 2.1 THE HISTORY OF VIKING STUDIES IN NORWAY......................................................................................... 16 2.2 GENDER STUDIES .................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 LANDSCAPE – FINALLY LOOKING PAST THINGS ........................................................................................ 22 2.4 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 23 CHAPTER 3. THE VIKING AGE – A WIDER CONTEXT ...................................................................... 25 3.1 ‘RELIGION’, BELIEF SYSTEMS AND THE RITUAL LANDSCAPE ..................................................................... 25 3.2 GENDER IDENTITIES AND ROLES .............................................................................................................. 28 3.3 THE LANDSCAPE OF POWER – CAN WE READ SOCIAL STATUS FROM LANDSCAPE? ...................................... 32 3.4 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 4. THE OSEBERG BURIAL ...................................................................................................... 35 4.1. THE OSEBERG FIND ................................................................................................................................ 35 4.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE FIND ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.3 THE BARROW’S POSITIONING IN THE LANDSCAPE ..................................................................................... 38 4.3 THE OSEBERG WOMEN ............................................................................................................................ 44 4.4 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 47 CHAPTER 5. THE CEMETERIES AT KAUPANG ................................................................................... 48 5.1 THE KAUPANG CASE ............................................................................................................................... 48 5.2 THE KAUPANG LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................................... 49 5.3 NORDRE KAUPANG AND HAGEJORDET .................................................................................................... 52 5.4 LAMØYA ................................................................................................................................................. 57 5.5 BIKJHOLBERGET ..................................................................................................................................... 60 5.6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................... 65 6.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... 65 6.2 WOMEN ON THE MARGINS: OF VIKING AGE SOCIAL ORDER OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION?........ 66 6.3 POWER AND INFLUENCE, THE DIFFERENCE FACES OF STATUS.................................................................... 68 6.4 FEMALE POWER: WITCHES, SHIELD MAIDENS AND MATRONS? .................................................................. 69 6.5 KAUPANG AND OSEBERG – EXCEPTIONS OR THE RULE? ............................................................................ 73 6.6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 77 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 78 BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................................................... 81 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................................... 95 3 List of illustrations Figure 1. Map showing the local area around the Oseberg mound 38 Figure 2. Raet, and it’s relation to some relevant sites in Vestfold 40 Figure 3. The Oseberg mound seen from a distance 41 Figure 4. View from the Oseberg mound 42 Figure 5. View from the Gokstad mound. 43 Figure 6. Two staffs from the Oseberg find 46 Figure 7. The Kaupang area as it would have appeared in the Viking Age 50 Figure 8. Map of the Kaupang cemeteries 51 Figure 9. Map of the graves of Nordre Kaupang in relation to road 54 Figure 10. Male to female ratio of gendered graves at Nordre Kaupang 55 Figure 11. Male to female ratio of gendered graves at Lamøya 58 Figure 12. Male to female ratio at Bikjholberget 62 Figure 13. Possible Volve staff? 70 4 Chapter 1. Introduction This chapter will outline the aims and objectives for my dissertation. In order to give a theoretical background for the evidence which will be presented in following chapters, I will start with a discussion of the main categories of evidence used: mortuary evidence, gendered evidence and the landscape. An outline of the structure and contents of the dissertation is will also be included. 1.1 Introductory statement – aims and objectives This dissertation is the result of a long standing interest in the expression of social identities of the past, perhaps more specifically, social identities as translated through gender, and their resulting cultural expressions and material remains. The overarching subject I wish to explore is the gender structures prevalent in the Late Iron Age in the county of Vestfold, Norway. The Scandinavian Late Iron Age, popularly known as the Viking Age, is often represented as deeply and inherently male, with male aggressiveness as the ideal presented to the public, leaving little room for alternative gender roles in the popular imagination (Jesch 1994:1). Gender is one of the basic structuring principles of most societies (Skogstrand 2002:121), and as a social category it must be understood in order to grasp the cultural complexity of a society. I will attempt to show that the gender roles of the Viking Age are perhaps often interpreted and represented too simplistically, and that popular stereotypes fail to take into account the complex multitude of categories, variations and negotiations which one ought to expect from the interpretation of gender. My basic proposition is that if the gender roles of the Viking Age were more complex than what is often believed, this may be reflected in the mortuary landscape and choice of location for burials: if there was sharp gender segregation in terms of social importance, this ought arguably to be reflected in burial customs. If it is not, this may lead towards a re-examination of the traditional gender roles assigned to the Late Iron Age. In order to approach this subject, I will look at the relative positioning of female graves in the mortuary landscape of the Viking Age, and I have chosen to focus on two different sites in the county now known as Vestfold: Oseberg and Kaupang. The choice of these two sites in particular was dominated by concerns including that they are both well documented, and have received a lot of attention in archaeological research. These considerations make the sites approachable for a student lacking the option of carrying out independent field research, and also amenable for a dissertation which relies on earlier research in order to re-examine established views of the past, as I aim to do here. The sites 5 represent different burial traditions, Oseberg being of a monumental nature in rural surroundings,