TF SIS495F 2009.Pdf (1.398Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TF SIS495F 2009.Pdf (1.398Mb) 2009 TASK FORCE SIS 495F, WINTER QUARTER 2009 U.S. RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA TASK FORCE EVALUATOR: DR. DAVID KRAMER TASK FORCE INSTRUCTOR: DR. ROBERT HUBER TASK FORCE STUDENT COORDINATOR: MICHAEL JUSSAUME TASK FORCE MEMBERS: DEMI ANTZOULATOS, TONY BOHORFOUSH, KATHRYN BURNS, REGINALD GOOCH, ZONG GUO, ANTHONY HARTMAN, MEI LI MCNEIL, LUCAS OLSON, REBECCA POTTS, JULIE SHULTZ, RORY STANLEY, GARRETT STRAIN, AND ANDREA SWENSON Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 4 GROUP REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Overview by Michael Jussaume ................................................................................................................................ 6 Arms Control Subgroup Report by Tony Bohorfoush, AJ Hartman, Andrea Swenson ............................................................................. 12 Economy and Trade Subgroup Report by Bennett Guo, Lucas Olson, Garett Strain ........................................................................................... 26 Human Rights Subgroup Report by Demi Antzoulatos, Kathryn Burns, Meili Mc Neil, Rebecca Potts.................................................... 48 Regional Issues Subgroup Report by Reginald Gooch, Julie Shultz, Rory Stanley ...................................................................................... 70 INDIVIDUAL TASK FORCE PAPERS FROM PARTICIPANTS IN THE COMMISSION ON UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA ...................................................................... 89 Arms Control……………………………………………………………………………………………90 Tony Bohorfoush, “Arms Control and the Obama Administration.” ................................................. 91 Anthony Hartman, “Making or Breaking U.S.-Russia Relations: The Potential for American ABM Policy to Change the World Dynamic.” ............................................................................................ 100 Andrea Swenson, “The Recent Decline in American Foreign Policy Towards Russia in Regards to Nuclear Arms Control.” .................................................................................................................... 115 Economy and Trade .............................................................................................................................. 129 Zong Guo, “Diversification of Energy Supply to Counter Russia’s Monopolization.” .................... 129 Michael Jussaume, “Challenges to Russian WTO Accession:Inclinations towards Protectionism in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis.” ........................................................................................ 151 Garrett Strain, “Russia’s Accession to the WTO: Implications and Challenges for the U.S.” ......... 165 Human Rights ....................................................................................................................................... 189 2 Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia Demi Antzoulatos, “A Managed Democracy: The Disappearance of Free Speech through the Weakening of Russian Civil Society.” .............................................................................................. 189 Katie Burns, “Until Parole or Death: Tuberculosis in Russian Prisons.”………………………….. 199 Mei Li McNeil, “Retreat of Religious Freedoms: The Russian Orthodox Church and the Rights of Religious Organizations.” ................................................................................................................. 224 Rebecca Potts, “Human Rights Violations Against Migrant Workers in the Russian Federation.” . 236 Regional Issues ..................................................................................................................................... 256 Reggie Gooch, “Efficacy of US Policy toward Russia Regarding Iran: 1993-Present.” .................. 256 Lucas Olson, “Taking a Look at U.S.-Russian Relations Through NATO ...................................... 269 Julie Shultz, “Contributing Factors to Increased Tensions between Russia and Georgia.” .............. 282 Rory Stanley, “Russia-Venezuela and U.S. Relations: Will There be Another Missile Crisis?” ..... 296 3 Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia Acknowledgements At this time, the commission would like to thank Professor Bob Huber, who in his attempt to be modest, named himself the “Grand Poobah” of the Task Force. However, “Grand Poobah” may not be a fitting title, as he truly deserves credit for his guidance, patience, and advice while helping us through this long and arduous process. It would not be an understatement to say that without his help and mentoring influence, the successful completion of the Report would not have been possible. The Editor and Task Force Coordinator would also like to take this time to thank all the members of the Task Force for their unflagging effort in this endeavor. All members of the task force remained both cooperative and receptive to the undoubtedly trying and bothersome comments and suggestions, both good and poor, made by the Task Force Coordinator over the course of the quarter. In addition, they were extremely gracious in putting up with the Coordinator’s numerous inadequacies, especially in the area of graphic arts, and remained pleasant to work and grow with until the very end. The chance to work with them all was both an honor and a pleasure. 4 Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia GROUP REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA I. Arms Control Subgroup Report By Tony Bohorfush, Anthony Hartman, and Andrea Swenson II. Economy and Trade Subgroup Report Zong Guo, Lucas Olson, and Garrett Strain III. Human Rights Subgroup Report Demi Antzoulatos, Katie Burns, Mei Li McNeil, and Rebecca Potts IV. Regional Issues Subgroup Report Reggie Gooch, Julie Shultz, and Rory Stanley Editors: Bob Huber and Michael Jussaume 5 Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia Overview Michael Jussaume Over the course of the Bush Administration’s tenure in Washington, the United States’ policies were increasingly focused on issues of national security. This development was not surprising in that the Terrorist Attacks on September 11th sent shockwaves through America that both heralded and necessitated a change in American foreign policy. For better or for worse, the Bush administration chose to pursue a swift, aggressive, uncompromising, and increasingly unilateral stance on security issues and swiftly reached the decision to wage a global “War on Terror.” Indeed, the issue of Terrorism and the “War on Terror,” came to be the defining issue of the Bush Administration, and have strongly affected United States relations with Russia. The years following the September 11th attacks saw the International Standing of the United States decline as the United States largely spurned international organizations such as the UN, and struck out on its own to pursue a hard line and unilateral foreign security policy. In addition, apparent human rights violations such as in Guantanamo Bay further sapped United States credibility in the international arena. Though the impacts of events following the September 11th Terrorist Attacks are too numerous to discuss here, there is one in particular that is an important issue when considering future United States-Russia relations. I believe that the Iraq War, and the quagmire that ensued, displayed the limits of American power and influence in the world. Though much was made of 6 Report of the Commission on United 2009 States Relations with Russia American “hegemony” in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union, such “hegemony,” if it existed at all, seems to have been short lived. The United States had limited success in gathering the support of allied nations in its “Coalition of the Willing,” and while being bogged down in Iraq, repeatedly showed its inability to force nations to accede to its demands. One of the best examples of this is Iran, which has refused American demands to refrain from developing nuclear technology, despite its limited military strength. In other words, though the United States may be the only remaining global power, it does not have the strength to unilaterally impose its will on other nations, and must in the future seek to work together and attempt to develop better relationships with important regional powers to reach its goals. Of course, one of the most important regional powers is Russia. Unfortunately for the United States, relations with Russia have soured in recent years. Indeed, Stephen Pifer, author of the policy paper, Reversing the Decline: An Agenda for U.S.-Russian Relations in 2009, claims that “U.S.-Russian relations have fallen to their lowest level since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.”1 The US-Russian relationship has been beset with numerous issues that have both increased tensions, and must be addressed for a fruitful relationship between the two nations in the future. Such issues include the perpetual issue of arms control and the expiring START treaty, the issue of the Eastern Europe missile shield and Anti Ballistic
Recommended publications
  • Advancing Freedom in Russia Steven Groves
    No. 2088 November 29, 2007 Advancing Freedom in Russia Steven Groves The current Moscow power establishment is The Moscow leadership seems impervious to leading Russia back in time. Instead of moving for- America’s and Europe’s pleas to foster democracy. ward toward a nation that cherishes and protects While the U.S. and its allies wait for a more oppor- freedom and democracy, the establishment is creat- tune time to reengage, they should consider refo- ing a state and body politic dominated by a new cusing their efforts on Russia’s neighbors that are breed of oligarchic groups composed of security willing to democratize. Ultimately, the Russians officers and their business allies. themselves need to realize that they can benefit The Russian media are no longer free and unre- more by integrating into the West and developing stricted. With the exception of a few minor show- democratic institutions that will preserve and pro- case outlets and the Internet, the media are tect their freedoms. dominated by the Kremlin and its allies. The major- On the other hand, Washington cannot ignore ity of political parties are under state control, and Moscow. Too many pressing issues—from Iran and the activities of nongovernmental organizations nuclear proliferation to arms control treaties and the (NGOs) with foreign ties are under severe scrutiny. future of conventional forces in Europe—are on the Russia is no longer a free nation. table. Even during the Soviet era, Washington and A return to authoritarianism is not in the interests Moscow at times had a robust diplomatic engage- of the Russian people, their European neighbors, or ment, despite viewing the world very differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Brave New World Service a Unique Opportunity for the Bbc to Bring the World to the UK
    BRAVE NEW WORLD SERVIce A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BBC TO BRING THE WORLD TO THE UK JOHN MCCaRTHY WITH CHARLOTTE JENNER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Value 4 Integration: A Brave New World Service? 8 Conclusion 16 Recommendations 16 INTERVIEWEES Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, Ishbel Matheson, Director of Media, Save the Children and University of Westminster former East Africa Correspondent, BBC World Service John Baron MP, Member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee Rod McKenzie, Editor, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat and Charlie Beckett, Director, POLIS BBC 1Xtra News Tom Burke, Director of Global Youth Work, Y Care International Richard Ottaway MP, Chair, Foreign Affairs Select Committee Alistair Burnett, Editor, BBC World Tonight Rita Payne, Chair, Commonwealth Journalists Mary Dejevsky, Columnist and leader writer, The Independent Association and former Asia Editor, BBC World and former newsroom subeditor, BBC World Service Marcia Poole, Director of Communications, International Jim Egan, Head of Strategy and Distribution, BBC Global News Labour Organisation (ILO) and former Head of the Phil Harding, Journalist and media consultant and former World Service training department Director of English Networks and News, BBC World Service Stewart Purvis, Professor of Journalism and former Lindsey Hilsum, International Editor, Channel 4 News Chief Executive, ITN Isabel Hilton, Editor of China Dialogue, journalist and broadcaster Tony Quinn, Head of Planning, JWT Mary Hockaday, Head of BBC Newsroom Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, BOND Peter
    [Show full text]
  • VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Abduzokirkhuja Ozodkhujayev
    VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND DIMPLOMACY POLITICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT Abduzokirkhuja Ozodkhujayev MODERN FORMS OF POLITICAL PROTEST IN RUSSIA (MODERNIOSIOS PROTESTO FORMOS RUSIJOJE) Bachelor final thesis World politics and economy, state code 612L20009 Political science studies Supervisor _____ Dr. Gintare Zukaite_______________ Defended _____Prof. dr. Sarunas Liekis_________________ Kaunas, 2020 CONTENTS Contents ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. 3 SANTRAUKA .......................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 I. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF PROTEST ............................................................................... 10 1.1 Concept of Protest ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 Theories of protest ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Traditional forms of protest ......................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Reasons for protest ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Effects and Russian Disinformation Campaigns
    Homeland Security Affairs Journal SPECIAL COVID-19 ISSUE COVID-19 Effects and Russian Disinformation Campaigns By Wesley R. Moy and Kacper Gradon 2 COVID-19 Effects and Russian Disinformation Campaigns By Wesley R. Moy and Kacper Gradon Abstract The effects of the novel coronavirus and its related disease COVID-19 have been far reaching, touching American society and its Western partners’ health and mortality, economics, social relationships, and politics. The effects have highlighted longstanding societal divisions, disproportionately harming minority groups and the socioeconomically disadvantaged with Black Americans and their communities hit especially hard. The problem being considered is the potential for Russian malign foreign influence to exploit the divides exacerbated by the coronavirus and target the United States and its European allies during the period leading to the 2020 elections and beyond. Possible coronavirus effects are inventoried and categorized into economic, healthcare, and environmental issue areas that may be leveraged and weaponized. The article includes the scenarios of such weaponization, including the description of focal points that may be attacked. We conclude with a set of recommendations to counter malign foreign influence. Suggested Citation Moy, Wesley and Kacper Gradon. “COVID-19 Effects and Russian Disinformation” Homeland Security Affairs 16, Article 8 (December, 2020) www.hsaj.org/articles16533. Introduction In late-May 2020, the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its related illness COVID-19, had resulted in the deaths of more than 100,000 Americans and infected nearly 1.7 million. By mid- October 2020, deaths had increased to over 210,000 and nearly 8,000,000 have been infected.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Apply a News User Model in Digital Publishing WAN-IFRA Dubai 2021
    How to apply a news user model in digital publishing WAN-IFRA Dubai 2021 19 May 2021 Dmitry Shishkin @dmitryshishkin Independent digital consultant Content, Transformation, Innovation How is my experience relevant to this talk? Career ● 20+ years as a journalist and editor: radio, online, video, social - BBC News Russian, BBC News and BBC World Service ● Chief Content Officer, Culture Trip ● Independent digital consultant, working with publishers, content creators, tech companies ● Board Member, World Editors’ Forum, WAN-IFRA ● Leader in Residence, University of Central Lancashire, UK Without data, you are just another person with an opinion. W. Edwards Deming The basics: Success = delivering superior quality in your niche …”What is important to note, though, is that while quality is relatively binary, the number of ways to be focused — that is, the number of niches in the world — are effectively infinite; success, in other words, is about delivering superior quality in your niche — the former is defined by the latter”... Ben Thompson, Stratechery - Disney and Integrators Versus Aggregators Audience-centric approach to doing news based on user needs* 1. ‘Hard’ news is not enough to attract people regularly or with sufficient engagement. 2. Commodity, ‘agenda’ news are everywhere, relevancy, unique takes and engagement become the differentiator. 3. There is misalignment between what audience wants in digital - information, yes, but also understanding, inspiration, utility, fun - and what it currently gets from media outlets. What Do News Readers Really Want to Read About? How Relevance Works for News Audiences Newsroom mission is directly linked to its audience user needs 1. Failing to satisfy them means loss of audience and lack of engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFLICTS to COME | 15 SCENARIOS for 2030 European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)
    CHAILLOT PAPER / PAPER CHAILLOT 161 CONFLICTS TO COME 15 scenarios for 2030 CONFLICTS TO COME COME TO CONFLICTS Edited by Florence Gaub With contributions from Natasha E. Bajema, Lotje Boswinkel, Daniel Fiott, | Franz-Stefan Gady, Zoe Stanley-Lockman, Kathleen 15 SCENARIOS FOR 2030 J. McInnis, Nicolas Minvielle, Andrew Monaghan, Katariina Mustasilta, Ali Fathollah-Nejad, Patryk Pawlak, Tobias Pietz, Sinikukka Saari, Stanislav Secrieru, Simona R. Soare, Bruno Tertrais and Olivier Wathelet CHAILLOT PAPER / 161 December 2020 European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) 100, avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris http://www.iss.europa.eu Director: Gustav Lindstrom © EU Institute for Security Studies, 2020. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. print ISBN 978-92-9198-973-7 online ISBN 978-92-9198-972-0 CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-AA-20-005-EN-C CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-AA-20-005-EN-N ISSN 1017-7566 ISSN 1683-4917 DOI 10.2815/101723 DOI 10.2815/966219 Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in Belgium by Bietlot. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. Cover image credit: Daniel Cheung/unsplash CONFLICTS TO COME 15 scenarios for 2030 Edited by Florence Gaub With contributions from Natasha E. Bajema, Lotje Boswinkel, Daniel Fiott, Franz-Stefan Gady, Zoe Stanley-Lockman, Kathleen J. McInnis, Nicolas Minvielle, Andrew Monaghan, Katariina Mustasilta, Ali Fathollah-Nejad, Patryk Pawlak, Tobias Pietz, Sinikukka Saari, Stanislav Secrieru, Simona R. Soare, Bruno Tertrais and Olivier Wathelet CHAILLOT PAPER / 161 December 2020 The editor Florence Gaub is the Deputy Director of the EUISS.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA DA APPARTAMENTO Per BCL- SWL
    Panorama radiofonico internazionale n. 27 Dal 1982 dalla parte del Radioascolto Rivista telematica edita in proprio dall'AIR Associazione Italiana Radioascolto c.p. 1338 - 10100 Torino AD www.air-radio.it l’editoriale ………………. radiorama PANORAMA RADIOFONICO INTERNAZIONALE organo ufficiale dell’A.I.R. Associazione Italiana Radioascolto Anche il nuovo anno vi porta un nuovo numero di recapito editoriale: radiorama con tanti articoli ed informazioni. radiorama - C. P. 1338 - 10100 TORINO AD e-mail: [email protected] AIR - radiorama Vi ricordo che la quota associativa AIR per l’anno 2014 è - Responsabile Organo Ufficiale: Giancarlo VENTURI - Responsabile impaginazione radiorama:Claudio RE di 8,90 euro e deve essere necessariamente versata nel più breve - Responsabile Blog AIR-radiorama: i singoli Autori - Responsabile sito web: Emanuele PELICIOLI tempo possibile magari utilizzando il metodo di pagamento con ------------------------------------------------- PAYPAL tramite il nostro sito www.air-radio.it Il presente numero di radiorama e' pubblicato in rete in proprio dall'AIR Associazione Italiana Radioascolto, tramite Il nostro Blog AIR-Radiorama ha superato le 900.000 il server Aruba con sede in località Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena Stazione visualizzazioni in 156 diversi Paesi ed il Gruppo Facebook che ha (AR). Non costituisce testata giornalistica, superato i 4000 iscritti sono gli altri principali traini multimediali non ha carattere periodico ed è aggiornato secondo la disponibilità e la reperibilità dei per la opera di divulgazione della Cultura del Radioascolto nel materiali. Pertanto, non può essere mondo . considerato in alcun modo un prodotto editoriale ai sensi della L. n. 62 del 7.03.2001. La responsabilità di quanto Ricordo infine che ogni appassionato può partecipare pubblicato è esclusivamente dei singoli Autori.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare
    November 2019 Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare Candace Rondeaux Last edited on November 05, 2019 at 11:41 a.m. EST Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Peter Bergen and It is worth noting that some of the best research Daniel Rothenberg, co-directors of the New America/ produced about the Wagner Group and Russian Arizona State University Future of War project for private military security contractors has been their support throughout the production of this paper. produced by anonymous open source intelligence A deep debt of gratitude is owed to David Sterman researchers, human rights activists and investigative for applying his sharp editorial eye to the text and journalists in Ukraine, Russia, Syria, and elsewhere. sharing his analytical intuition throughout the This paper would not be what it is without their brave research for this report. I also benefited greatly efforts to hold power to account and the extensive Sergey Sukhankin’s research on Russian military advice and help of so many people, many of whom affairs and the Wagner Group and his direct could not be named here due to security concerns. contributions to the historical sections of this report All errors of fact or interpretation are, of course, the covering Moscow’s Cold War strategy in the Middle author’s alone. East elevated the analysis greatly. Navvar Saban’s research on private security contractors and pro- Assad militias likewise helped answer critical questions about Russia’s influence over local proxy forces in Syria. Christopher Miller, Mike Eckel, and many other long-time Russia hands who have spent time living and covering the Kremlin and the conflict in Ukraine were essential sounding boards and critical pillars of support throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Jeremy Summerly 17 September 2020
    RADIO IN THE 78 RPM ERA (1920-1948) PROFESSOR JEREMY SUMMERLY 17 SEPTEMBER 2020 At 7.10 pm on 15 June 1920, a half-hour broadcast was given by Australian prima donna Dame Nellie Melba (‘the world’s very best artist’). Singing from a workshop at the back of the Marconi Wireless and Telegraph Company, the 59-year old soprano described her Chelmsford recital as ‘the most wonderful experience of my career’. The transmission was received all around Europe, as well as in Soltan-Abad in Persia (now Arak in Iran) to the East, and Newfoundland (at the time a Dominion of the British Empire) to the West. Dame Nellie’s recital became recognized as Britain’s first official radio broadcast and the Daily Mail (predictably, perhaps, in its role as sponsor) described the event as ‘a great initiation ceremony; the era of public entertainment may be said to have completed its preliminary trials’. The Radio Corporation of America had been founded a year earlier, run by a young Russian- American businessman David Sarnoff. Sarnoff believed that ‘broadcasting represents a job of entertaining, informing and educating the nation, and should therefore be distinctly regarded as a public service’, words that were later echoed more famously by John Reith of the British Broadcasting Company. On 11 May 1922, daily radio transmissions of an hour began from the 7th floor of Marconi House at London’s Aldwych. The Marconi Company’s London station was known as 2LO and its first concert (for voice, cello, and piano) was broadcast on 24 June; the Prince of Wales (later Edward VIII) broadcast from Marconi House on 7 October.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Prepare for COVID Lawmakers Seek ‘Endangered’ Status for Local Protocols for Dealing with Virus Not Affected by Gov
    Project1:Layout 1 6/10/2014 1:13 PM Page 1 Olympics: A look back at some top images of empathy /B1 TUESDAY T O DA Y C I T R U S C O U N T Y & n e x t m o r n i n g HIGH 91 Partly sunny; LOW scattered evening storms. 75 PAGE A4 www.chronicleonline.com AUGUST 10, 2021 Florida’s Best Community Newspaper Serving Florida’s Best Community $1 VOL. 126 ISSUE 307 NEWS BRIEFS Schools prepare for COVID Lawmakers seek ‘endangered’ status for Local protocols for dealing with virus not affected by Gov. DeSantis order manatees HANNAH signed into law House Bill Health and the Florida parents’ right under Flor- In addition, the order 241, the Parents’ Bill of Department of Education ida law to make health states the Florida Com- With Florida seeing a SACHEWICZ Staff writer Rights, which prevents to work together. care decisions for their missioner of Education record number of mana- any governmental institu- The goal of this partner- minor children; and pro- will pursue all legal tee deaths this year, two On July 30, Gov. Ron De- tion from making health ship is to ensure COVID- tect children with disabil- means available to ensure congressmen Monday Santis issued an execu- care decisions for minor 19 safety protocols that, ities or health conditions districts adhere to Flor- said they have introduced tive order, “Ensuring children. according to the executive who would be harmed by ida law, including with- legislation that would des- Parents’ Freedom to The governor’s execu- order, “do not violate Flo- certain protocols such as holding funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Satellite Imagery of Recent Cross-Border
    Hostle Territory: Lessons Learned from Satellite Imagery of Recent Cross-Border Conficts Disclaimer Contact the Geospatial Technologies Project geotech © Copyright 2015 Geospatial Technologies Project Program Associate Acknowledgement Table of Contents Introducton 2 Africa 4 Sudan and South Sudan, 2011-2012 4 Djibout and Eritrea, 2008 12 Intra-Regional Comparison 20 Asia 22 Cambodia and Thailand, 2008-2011 22 India and Pakistan, 2001-2002 30 Intra-Regional Comparison 38 Former Soviet Union 40 Russia and Georgia, 2008 40 Armenia and Azerbaijan, 2008-2012 46 Ukraine and Russia, 2014 52 Intra-Regional Comparison 60 Inter-Regional Comparison 62 Endnotes 66 Table of Contents 1 Introducton In 2013, with funding from the United Because countries engaged in border States Insttute of Peace, the Geospatal disputes almost always difer on the subject Technologies and Human Rights Project of the of the boundary's locaton, and due to the American Associaton for the Advancement of potental for error in the various datasets Science began the project “Hostle Territory: in use, this investgaton did not limit itself Revealing Trends in Cross-Border Confict to observing phenomena directly adjacent Using Satellite Imagery.” The goal of this to internatonally-recognized fronters. project was to evaluate the prospects for Instead, the entrety of the disputed area providing early warning of confict using was considered for analysis, along with, in analysis of high-resoluton satellite imagery of many cases, facilites such as military bases historical border conficts as case studies. The that were located deep within uncontested project analyzed imagery of the belligerents territory, but which were deemed relevant to prior to and during the confict in order to the confict.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Military Intelligence: Background and Issues for Congress
    Russian Military Intelligence: Background and Issues for Congress November 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46616 SUMMARY R46616 Russian Military Intelligence: Background and November 24, 2020 Issues for Congress Andrew S. Bowen Following Russia’s occupation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and invasion of eastern Ukraine in Analyst in Russian and 2014, many observers have linked Russia to additional malicious acts abroad. U.S. and European European Affairs officials and analysts have accused Russia of, among other things, interfering in U.S. elections in 2016; attempting a coup in Montenegro in 2016; conducting cyberattacks against the World Anti- Doping Agency and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in 2016 and 2018, respectively; attempting to assassinate Russian intelligence defector Sergei Skripal in the United Kingdom in 2018; and offering “bounties” to Taliban-linked fighters to attack U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. Implicated in all these activities is Russia’s military intelligence agency, the Main Directorate of the General Staff (GU), also known as the GRU. The United States has indicted GRU officers and designated the GRU for sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, cybercrimes, and election interference. The Department of Justice has indicted GRU officers for cyber-related offenses against the World Anti-Doping Agency and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, NotPetya malware attacks in 2017, various cyberattacks against the 2018 Olympics, and interference in the 2016 U.S. elections. The GRU as an agency has been designated for sanctions under Executive Order 13694, as amended, and Section 224 of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
    [Show full text]