DOCSLIB.ORG

Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys Clearwater, Salmon, Weiser, and Payette River Basins Summary Report 1934 - 1942 DOE/BP-02246-2 January 1990 Field37: This Document should be cited as follows: McIntosh, Bruce, Sharon Clarke, James Sedell, ''Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys'', Project No. 1989-10400, 423 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-02246-2) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. Summary Report for Bureau of Fisheries Stream Habitat Surveys: Clearwater, Salmon, Weiser, and Payette River Basins 1934-1942 Prepared by: Bruce A. McIntosh Sharon E. Clarke and James R. Sedell Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA-Forest Service Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P. O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project No. 89-104 Contract No. DE-AI79-89BP02246 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction i Methods iii Literature Cited ix Summary Reports 1 A. Clearwater River Subbasin Clearwater River ......................... 1 Potlatch Creek ......................... 8 Orofino Creek .......................... 12 Middle Fork,Clearwater River .......... 15 Selway River ....................... 19 Lochsa River ....................... 23 B. Salmon River Subbasin Salmon River ............................. 27 Little Salmon River .................... 41 Middle Fork,Salmon River .......... 48 Big Creek ............ 1::: .......... 69 Camas Creek ........................ 74 West Fork ...................... 79 Loon Creek ......................... 84 Rock Creek ..................... 98 Warm Spring Creek .............. 99 Trapper Creek ............. 111 Mayfield Creek ................. 117 West Fork ................. 123 East Fork ................. 129 Trail Creek .................... 136 Pioneer Creek .................. 143 Little Loon Creek .................. 146 Marble Creek ....................... 152 Indian Creek ....................... 159 Pistol Creek ....................... 170 Big Pistol Creek ............... 175 Little Pistol Creek ............ 182 Rapid River ........................ 188 Soldier Creek ...................... 197 Elkhorn Creek ...................... 201 Sulphur Creek ...................... 205 Marsh Creek ........................ 213 Beaver Creek ................... 223 Cape Horn Creek ................ 231 Banner Creek .............. 238 Knapp Creek .................... 243 Bear Valley Creek .................. 247 Elk Creek ...................... 258 Paae Sack Creek ..................... 265 Cache Creek ........................ 267 Panther Creek ............................ 271 North Fork, Salmon River ................. 277 Lemhi River .............................. 278 Wimpey Creek ....................... 294 Pahsimeroi River ......................... 295 Redfish Lake Creek ....................... 300 C. Weiser River Subbasin Weiser River ............................. NP Mann Creek ............................. 304 Pine Creek ............................. 316 Middle Fork,Weiser River .............. 322 D. Payette River Subbasin Payette River'............................ 330 North Fork, Payette River .............. 338 Clear Creek ......................... 347 Big Creek ........................... 350 Gold Fork Creek ..................... 354 Lake Fork Creek ..................... 360 South Fork, Payette River .............. 365 Middle Fork, Payette River .......... 375 Silver Creek ...................... 381 Deadwood River ...................... 385 Clear Creek ......................... 390 Eightmile Creek ..................... 394 Tenmile Creek ....................... 397 Warm Springs Creek .................. 401 Canyon Creek ........................ 404 NP =not present INTRODUCTION This document contains summary reports of stream habitat surveys, conducted in Idaho,by the Bureau of Fisheries (BOF, now National Marine Fisheries Service) from 1938-1942.. These surveys were part of a larger project to survey streams in the Columbia River basin that provided, or had provided, spawning and rearing habitat for salmon and steelhead (Rich, 1948). The purpose of the survey was, as described by Rich, "to determine the present condition of the various tributaries with respect to their availability and usefulness for the migration, breeding, and rearing of migratory fishes". The Idaho portion of the survey consisted of extensive surveys of the Clearwater, Salmon, Weiser, and Payette River Subbasins. Current estimates of the loss of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin are based on a series of reports published from 1949-1952 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The reports were brief, qualitative accounts of over 5000 miles of stream surveys conducted by the BOF from 1934-1946 (Bryant, 1949; Bryant and Parkhurst, 1950; Parkhurst, 1950a-c; Parkhurst et al., 1950). Despite their brevity,these BOF reports have formed the basis for estimating fish habitat losses and conditions in the Columbia River Basin (Fulton, 1968, 1970; Thompson, 1976; NPPC, 1986). Recently, the field notebooks from the BOF surveys were discovered. The data is now archived and stored in the Forest Science DataBank at Oregon State University (Stafford et al., 1984; 1988). These records are the earliest and most comprehensive documentation available of the condition and extent of anadromous fish habitat before hydropower development in the Columbia River Basin. They provide the baseline data for quantifying changes and setting a benchmark for future restoration of anadromous fish habitat throughout the Basin. The summaries contained in this book are exact replicates of the originals. Due to discrepancies between the field data and the summaries, the database should be used to assess pooland substrate conditions. This data is available from the Bonneville Power Administration. The Bureau of Fisheries survey is unique because it is the only long-term data set that quantifies fish habitat in a manner that is replicable over time;no other similar work is known to exist. Other surveys, such as Thompson and Haas (1960), inventoried extensive areas in a manner that was mostly qualitative,subjectively estimating physical characteristics like bank cover and stream shading. Spawning, rearing, and resting habitat were not systematically quantified to allow comparisons over time. Knowledge of the pastand present quantity and quality of anadromous fish habitat in the Columbia River Basin is essential to any effort to enhance fish populations. Habitat condition is a key element in monitoring and evaluating progress towards the doubling goal.Integration of this information into the Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Plan can provide the baseline information to greatly enhance understanding of past, present, and future habitat conditions in the basin to provide for improved management decisions. ii METHODS This description of the survey is taken from Rich (1948). In cases where his meaning was unclear, we have clarified his descriptions where possible. Most of the field work for the survey was accomplished by teams of two men. Each stream was examined on foot if warranted by its existing or potential value in a program of fishery maintenance. At times, horses and boats were used to conduct the surveys. It was customary to start at the mouth and work up to a point at which the stream ceased to be important. The survey was commonly terminated if the stream became to small to be of value, at total barriers,such as waterfalls, or wherever other conditions were such that the stream was of no present value and there was no reasonable hope of improvement. Beyond such points a more cursory inspection was frequently made although not always. As the stream was traversed on foot, field observations were recorded on forms provided for the purpose--the "Observation Blank". Records were made at approximately 100-yard intervals. Distances were estimated by counting steps when conditions were favorable for pacing and, otherwise,by estimating short distances by eye. When possible,the sums of such estimated distances have been checked against maps,particularly when surveys were made by boat, and any substantial discrepancy has been noted on the survey record. At the upper end of each 100-yard section a record was made on the Observation Blank of such things as stream size, pools, character of the bottom, fish observed, etc. The location of barriers to upstream migration of fish, such as log jams, falls or dams was also recorded and an estimate made of' the degree of obstruction. Stations were designated, usually at intervals of several miles,at important landmarks or where stream conditions exhibited a marked change. At these stations special data were obtained and recorded on a "station Blank" that included measurements of width, depth, flow and temperature. Record was also made of 'general conditions observed between stations that were not recorded on the observation blank. These included such items as the nature of the marginal vegetation (riparian), evidences of erosion and of fluctuations in water level, gradient, character of the valley, type and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Riggins & Salmon River Canyon
    RRiiggggiinnss && SSaallmmoonn RRiivveerr CCaannyyoonn EEccoonnoommiicc DDeevveellooppmmeenntt SSttrraatteeggyy (FINAL DRAFT) Prepared for the City of Riggins February 2006 by James A. Birdsall & Associates The Hingston Roach Group, Inc. Bootstrap Solutions FINAL DRAFT [Inside cover.] RIGGINS AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FEBRUARY 2006 FINAL DRAFT CONTENTS 1. Introduction......................................................................................1 Planning Process and Project Phases ..............................................................1 Riggins History and Assets. ..............................................................................2 2. Socio-Economic Trends....................................................................4 Population. ..........................................................................................................4 Age Composition................................................................................................5 Education & Enrollment...................................................................................5 Industry Trends..................................................................................................6 Employment, Wages & Income.......................................................................7 Business Inventory.............................................................................................9 Retail Trends.......................................................................................................9 Tourism
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Migration and Survival Between the Upper Salmon River Basin and Lower Granite Dam for Juvenile Snake River Sockeye Salmon, 2011-2014
    Characterizing migration and survival between the Upper Salmon River Basin and Lower Granite Dam for juvenile Snake River sockeye salmon, 2011-2014 Gordon A. Axel, Christine C. Kozfkay,† Benjamin P. Sandford, Mike Peterson,† Matthew G. Nesbit, Brian J. Burke, Kinsey E. Frick, and Jesse J. Lamb Report of research by Fish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112 and †Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1800 Trout Road, Eagle, Idaho 83616 for Division of Fish and Wildlife, Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 Project 2010-076-00; covers work performed and completed under contract 46273 REL 78 from March 2010 to March 2016 May 2017 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of its program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. Views in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. ii Executive Summary During spring 2011-2014, we tagged and released groups of juvenile hatchery Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka to Redfish Lake Creek in the upper Salmon River Basin. These releases were part of a coordinated study to characterize migration and survival of juvenile sockeye to Lower Granite Dam. We estimated detection probability, survival, and travel time based on detections of fish tagged with either a passive integrated transponder (PIT) or radio transmitter and PIT tag.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho LSRCP Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations Report – March 2011
    4U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region Columbia River Basin Hatchery Review Team Columbia River Basin, Mountain Snake Province Snake, Salmon, and Clearwater River Watersheds Idaho Lower Snake River Compensation Plan State Operated Hatcheries Clearwater, Magic Valley, McCall, and Sawtooth Fish Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations Final Report, Summary March 2011 Please cite as: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Review of Idaho Lower Snake River Compensation Plan State-Operated Hatcheries, Clearwater, Magic Valley, McCall, and Sawtooth Fish Hatcheries: Assessments and Recommendations. Final Report, Summary, March 2011. Hatchery Review Team, Pacific Region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/Pacific/fisheries/ hatcheryreview/reports.html. USFWS COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN HATCHERY REVIEW TEAM Idaho LSRCP Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations Report – March 2011 Preface The assessments and recommendations presented in this report represent the independent evaluations of the Hatchery Review Team and do not necessarily represent the conclusions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). The Review Team used the most current scientific information available and the collective knowledge of its members to develop the recommendations presented in this report. The Service will respect existing agreements with comanagers when considering the recommendations presented in this report. The Review Team and Service acknowledge that the U.S. v Oregon process is the appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004
    Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004 Coeur d'Alene #S LEWIS WASHINGTON #SMoscow MONTANA NEZ Lewiston #S #S PERCE #S #S OREGON Boise Sun Valley # #S #S Grangeville #S Idaho Falls WYOMING S IDAHO #S a #S Pocatello l m Twin Falls o IDAHO n R i v e r r e v # i . Dixie R k F Salmon River n . Riggins o # N Towns # m l n a erlai S Counties r mb e ha Sa C lmon R v ek iver i re Major streams R C d i p Watershed (HUC) boundaries a L i Salmon R t t r l # e e Big LEMHI . v Cre S i e k k r e a F R k v New l . e i m n e S o r R L o m C e n l r n o m a Meadows R e # S h h t m i l v i n a e a R ADAMS r S P i VALLEY v # e Mid Fk r Yellow Lodge # Pine r e # iv R P n a Leadore o hs lm im a Challis e S ro k # i F R i id ve M r iver on R Stanley Salm # S r a e l v m i R o n n o R lm iv e a S r . k F . E CUSTER 100 1020304050Miles Galena # BLAINE Compiled by IDFG, CDC, 2001 Written by Ecovista Contracted by Nez Perce Tribe Watershed Division and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Contract Entities and Plan Participants.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Little Salmon River SBA and TMDL Addendum Implementation Plan for Agriculture (HUC 17060210)
    Little Salmon River SBA and TMDL Addendum Implementation Plan for Agriculture (HUC 17060210) Prepared by the Idaho Soil and Water Conservation Commission in cooperation with the Adams Soil and Water Conservation District April 2016 Original Plans: Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL (IDEQ February 2006) and Little Salmon River Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan for Agriculture, Forestry, and Urban/Suburban Activities (November 2008) Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Setting ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Land Use and Land Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 4 Conservation Accomplishments ................................................................................................................... 4 Resource Concerns........................................................................................................................................ 4 Sediment ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1967, Al and Frances Randall and Ramona Hammerly
    The Mountaineer I L � I The Mountaineer 1968 Cover photo: Mt. Baker from Table Mt. Bob and Ira Spring Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during March and April by The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington, 98111. Clubroom is at 719Y2 Pike Street, Seattle. Subscription price monthly Bulletin and Annual, $5.00 per year. The Mountaineers To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of North­ west America; To make expeditions into these regions m fulfill­ ment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all lovers of outdoor life. EDITORIAL STAFF Betty Manning, Editor, Geraldine Chybinski, Margaret Fickeisen, Kay Oelhizer, Alice Thorn Material and photographs should be submitted to The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington 98111, before November 1, 1968, for consideration. Photographs must be 5x7 glossy prints, bearing caption and photographer's name on back. The Mountaineer Climbing Code A climbing party of three is the minimum, unless adequate support is available who have knowledge that the climb is in progress. On crevassed glaciers, two rope teams are recommended. Carry at all times the clothing, food and equipment necessary. Rope up on all exposed places and for all glacier travel. Keep the party together, and obey the leader or majority rule. Never climb beyond your ability and knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:100,000 1 Inch = 1.6 Miles Central Idaho-01
    R 10 E R 11 E 115°7'30"W R 12 E 115°W R 13 E 114°52'30"W R 14 E 114°45'W R 15 E 114°37'30"W R 16 E 114°30'W R 17 E 114°22'30"W R 18 E S k i k e l v e Joe Jump Basin e Lookout Mountain k La e e r st e r r k C k e R C e h ee r C e e Little a Cr u Iron Cre k nce C l h r w Airport Rd e Car c C Central Idaho-01 e bo n an k B liv o t C nat e l e d e r u k i a r C e a g l C e F S r r e e e e S e C a M M C k e t s r a k o in a C a G o Creek s th rc in k i o m o e C Fire Suppression Constraints e S re C r k y e r k e e C m re e ek n m C e k i r r Alpine Peak o Ziegler Basin t Fish Critical Habitats T 10 N a C Observation Peak J e an s B g je T 10 N n d i Jimmy Smith Lake n v i ulch Bull Trout Critical Habitat a G r Hoodoo Lake L k rry k Creek ake Cree he G Big L Big Lake Creek 222 e Lake C Grandjean e Big Balsam Rd r k Trailer Lakes Regan, Mount C e Spawning Areas of Concern Little Redfish Lake e ry r S a C ek 222 F re Trail Creek Lakes d o o C n c rk l u r Resource Avoidance Area 36 P i 36 o a ra Big Lake Creek a Williams Peak B M ye T NF-214 Rd tte 31 31 36 31 31 36 31 Ri Cleveland Creek Safety Concerns ve 36 Wapiti Creek Rd r EAST FORK 36 S a l Suppression tactics Avoidance Area 01 Thompson Peak m o Railroad Ridge n Crater Lake 06 01 R Bluett Creek D Misc Resource Areas i ry 06 01 k v 01 01 06 06 Gu 01 06 k e e lc e re h e C r k r k k e Meadows, The C e oo re Watson Peak im Creek x Wilderness Area e hh C Iron Basin J o r Fis old Chinese Wall ek F C G re ti C Bluett Creek i Slate Creek r Retardant Avoidance Area p Gunsight Lake e a ld W ou B
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan Summary
    Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan Summary Introduction This recovery plan (Plan) serves as a blueprint for the protection and restoration of Snake River Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Snake River Sockeye Salmon were listed as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1991. The listing was reaffirmed in 2005. The species remains at risk of extinction. Today, the last remaining Snake River Sockeye Salmon spawn in Sawtooth Valley lakes, high in the Salmon River drainage of central Idaho in the Snake River basin. While very few Sockeye Salmon currently follow an anadromous life cycle, the small remnant run of the historical population migrates 900 miles downstream from the Sawtooth Valley through the Salmon, Snake and Columbia Rivers to the ocean (Figure ES-1). After one to three years in the ocean, they return to the Sawtooth Valley as adults, passing once again through these mainstem rivers and through eight major federal dams, four on the Columbia River and four on the lower Snake River. Anadromous Sockeye Salmon returning to Redfish Lake in Idaho’s Sawtooth Valley travel a greater distance from the sea (900 miles) to a higher elevation (6,500 feet) than any other Sockeye Salmon population. They are the southernmost population of Sockeye Salmon in the world. Figure ES-1. Snake River Sockeye Salmon migration corridor from Columbia River estuary to Sawtooth Valley lakes. Before the turn of the twentieth century, an estimated 150,000 Sockeye Salmon returned annually to the Snake River basin. Sockeye Salmon ascended the Snake River to the Wallowa River basin in northeastern Oregon and the Payette and Salmon River basins in Idaho to spawn in natural lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species (MIS) Were
    2009 Sawtooth Aquatic Management Indicator Species Monitoring Report John Chatel – Forest Aquatics Program Manager Dan Kenney – Zone Fisheries Biologist Scott Vuono – SNRA Aquatic Ecologist Introduction In order to evaluate the effects of management practices on fisheries and wildlife resources, the U.S. Forest Service monitors select species whose population trends are believed to reflect the effects of management activities on Forest ecosystems. These species are termed “management indicator species” (MIS) and the rationale for MIS monitoring is outlined in federal regulation 36 CFR 219.19. “In order to estimate the effects of each alternative on fish and wildlife populations, certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the area shall be identified and selected as management indicator species and the reasons for their selection will be stated. These species shall be selected because their population changes are believed to indicate the effects of management activities.” “Population trends of the management indicator species will be monitored and relationships to habitat changes determined.” An important criterion integral to the MIS foundation is that monitoring results must allow managers to answer questions about population trends. Historically, monitoring of habitat was 1 used a surrogate for direct quantification of MIS populations. However, recent court cases (Sierra Club v. Martin, 168 F.3d 1 (11th Cir. 1999)) have ruled that assessing changes in habitat will no longer be accepted as a substitute for direct monitoring of populations. The Forest Service has an obligation to collect and analyze quantitative population trend data at both the Forest-plan and project level. In response to issues raised by court challenges, the Sawtooth, Boise, and Payette National Forests revisited aquatic MIS species for the Draft Forest Plan EIS to determine if the population data were sufficient to determine trend at the Forest scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawtooth NF Stock Users Pamphlet
    The Stock User’s Guide Sawtooth National Recreation Area “It was a land of vast silent spaces, of lonely rivers, and of plains where the wild game stared at passing horsemen. We felt the beat of hardy life in our veins, and ours was the glory of work and the joy of living.” Theodore Roosevelt Contents 1 Welcome, Weeds and Frontcountry Camping 2 Avoiding Bruises (and Bears) 3 Where should I go? 4 A few Sawtooth facts 5-6 Leave No Trace at a Glance 7-10 Sawtooth Wilderness Backcountry Stock Tie Areas 11-12 Sawtooth Wilderness Regulations 13-14 Boulder-White Clouds Backcountry Stock Tie Areas and Regulations 15 Checklist: What to Take Back Contact Us Cover Welcome! The mountain meadows, alpine lakes and jagged peaks of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area (SNRA) await your visit. The task of keeping this area beautiful and undamaged belongs to all of us. As a stock user, you must take extra pre- cautions to safeguard the land. The introduction of noxious weeds, overgrazing, tree girdling and other impacts can be easily avoided with a bit of skill and preparation. This user’s guide can help you prepare for your trip. For example, did you know you must get a free wilderness permit from a Forest Service office if you are taking stock overnight into the Sawtooth Wilderness? Are you aware that the eastern side of the Wilderness is closed to grazing? So if you go, bring certified weed seed free feed (no loose hay or straw). For more useful tips, please read on, and have a great journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program Research Element
    SNAKE RIVER SOCKEYE SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM RESEARCH ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT January 1, 2004—December 31, 2004 Prepared by: Catherine Willard, Senior Fisheries Research Biologist Mike Peterson, Fisheries Research Biologist Kurtis Plaster, Senior Fisheries Technician Jason Castillo, Fisheries Technician Dan Baker, Hatchery Manager II Jeff Heindel, Assistant Hatchery Manager Jeremy Redding, Fish Culturist and Paul Kline, Principal Fisheries Research Biologist IDFG Report Number 06-01 January 2006 SNAKE RIVER SOCKEYE SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM RESEARCH ELEMENT 2004 Annual Project Progress Report Part 1—Project Overview Part 2—Oncorhynchus nerka Population Monitoring Part 3—Redfish and Stanley Lakes Sport Fishery Investigations Part 4—Sockeye Salmon Smolt Monitoring and Evaluation Part 5—Sockeye Salmon Spawning Investigations and Unmarked Juvenile Out-migrant Monitoring Part 6—Parental Lineage Investigations Part 7—Proximate Analysis for Juvenile Fish Quality Assessment Part 8—Predator Surveys By Catherine Willard Mike Peterson Kurtis Plaster Jason Castillo Dan Baker Jeff Heindel Jeremy Redding Paul Kline Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 To: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97283-3621 Project Number 1991-07-200 Contract Number 5342 IDFG Report Number 06-01 January 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]