Salmon River Drainage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salmon River Drainage Volume 059 Article 08 STATE OF IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 518 Front Street Boise, Idaho April 2, 1959 Recipients of this report: The attached report, prepared by Stacy Gebhards, contains a summary of information collected by him and other Department workers and constitutes the initial phase of the preparation of a planning report on the entire Salmon River drainage. Before the report is completed for the entire drainage, many persons will contribute additional information which will be inserted as it becomes available. The attached should be used as a guide in preparing reports on future survey work. LWM:cjc encl. COLUMBIA RIVER FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Preliminary Planning Report SALMON RIVER by Stacy V. Gebhards STATE OF IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Salmon, Idaho January 6, 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .................................................... 1 Little Salmon River.......... 1 ................................. 2 South Fork of the Salmon River .................................. 5 Secesh River and Lake Creek ................................ 7 East Fork of the South Fork ................................ 7 Johnson Creek .............................................. 8 Cabin Creek ................................................ 9 Warm Lake Creek ............................................ 9 Middle Fork of the Salmon River ................................ 13 Big Creek ................................................. 14 Wilson Creek .............................................. 15 Camas Creek ............................................... 15 Yellowjacket Creek ........................................ 18 Duck Creek ................................................ 18 West Fork of Camas Creek .................................. 18 Silver Creek .............................................. 19 South Fork of Camas Creek ................................. 19 Loon Creek ................................................ 19 Warm Spring Creek ......................................... 20 Mayfield Creek ............................................ 20 Trail Creek ............................................... 20 Marble Creek .............................................. 21 Indian Creek .............................................. 21 Pistol Creek .............................................. 21 Little Pistol Creek ....................................... 21 Rapid River ............................................... 21 Sulphur Creek ............................................. 22 Dagger Falls .............................................. 22 Marsh Creek ............................................... 23 Beaver Creek .............................................. 23 Cape Horn Creek ........................................... 24 Knapp Creek ............................................... 24 Bear Valley Creek ......................................... 25 Elk Creek ................................................. 26 Panther Creek .................................................. 29 Clear Creek ............................................... 31 Napias Creek .............................................. 31 North Fork of the Salmon River ................................. 33 Hughes Creek............................................... 35 Sheep Creek ............................................... 35 Dahlonega Creek ........................................... 35 Anderson Creek ............................................ 35 Twin Creek ................................................ 36 Page Carmen Creek .............................................. 38 Lemhi River ............................................... 39 Hayden Creek ......................................... 42 Bear Valley Creek .................................... 43 Spring Creek ......................................... Pahs imero i River ........................................ 45 Big Spring Creek ..................................... 46 Sulphur Creek ........................................ 46 Challis Creek ............................................. 48 East Fork of the Salmon River ............................. 49 Herd Creek ........................................... 49 Warm Springs Creek ........................................ 51 Yankee Fork ............................................... 52 Valley Creek .............................................. 54 Redfish Lake Creek ........................................ 56 Little Redfish Lake .................................. 56 Redfish Lake .......................................... 56 Alturas Lake Creek ........................................ 58 Salmon River .............................................. 60 North Fork to Morgan Creek ........................... 60 Morgan Creek to Stanley .............................. 61 Stanley to headwaters ................................ 61 Discussion ................................................ 64 Bibliography .............................................. 66 INTRODUCTION The Salmon River, originating in the rugged Sawtooth Mountains, flows in a northerly direction for approximately 170 miles to North Fork. Here the river turns directly west for 150 miles, cutting through the second deepest canyon on the North American continent, from which came the name of "River of No Return". At Riggins the river again swings north and west for 82 miles and enters the Snake River. The drainage area of the Salmon River encompasses some 13,600 square miles, making it the largest river system within the boundaries of one state. Average discharge over a 43 year period near Whitebird, Idaho, was 10,710 cubic feet per second. A maximum discharge of 103,000 cubic feet per second was recorded on June 3, 1948, and a minimum of 1,580 cubic feet per second on December 11, 1931 (Anon., 1955). Pirtle (1957) lists the average number of spring chinook utilizing the drainage as 68,087, with an estimated sport catch of 35,702 fish and a spawning escapement of 32,385 fish. In 1955 a total of 4,361 blueback sal- mon were counted at the Redfish Lake Creek weir. The average annual sport catch of steelhead trout for the Salmon River is estimated at 14,185 fish. The purpose of this report is to outline the data gathered on the streams in the drainage along with recommendations for future planned pro- jects under the Columbia River Program. 1 LITTLE SALMON RIVER Basin description Stream topography. The Little Salmon River enters the main Salmon River at Riggins, 82 miles above the mouth. It is 43 miles in length and drains an area of 576 square miles. The lower 24 miles of stream follows a steep gradient. Discharge. Maximum discharge recorded between 1951-1955 was 5,560 c.f.s. on June 13, 1953 and minimum of 116 c.f.s. on February 20, 1955. The mean discharge is around 814 c.f.s. On June 1, 1948, a flood discharge of 9,200 c.f.s. caused considerable damage to property and to the stream itself in the lower half of the river. Economic development The economy of the region is supported chiefly by cattle raising in the New Meadows area and logging. About 13,600 acres are under irrigation in the drainage. Trout fishing anc hunting on the upper river supports a small tourist industry. History of the fishery According to local residents, the Little Salmon at one time supported a fair run of salmon. In 1942, Parkhurst considered the stream to be of little or no value as a salmon producer. Present status of the stream Parkhurst (1942) estimated the available spawning area of the stream in the lower 34 miles to be 76,000 square yards, constituting 9 per cent of the total bottom. Much of the spawning area has undoubtedly been altered since that time by erosive floods, deposition of gravel, and channel changes by the state highway department. The area above Little Salmon Falls affords the best present potential value for anadromous fish. During November 28-30, 1956, a general reconnaissance was made of the area. Critical evaluation of the stream at that time was impossible since over 50 per cent of it was cov- 2 ered by ice. Little Salmon Falls to Zim's plunge. The area at the time of the sur- vey was largely covered with ice except in riffle areas. Riffles were characterized by large gravel 3 to 6 inches in diameter and would provide poor spawning areas. The gradient was fairly constant which resulted in a low percentage of riffle areas. The stream bottom, except in the riffles, consisted of fine gravel and mud. Average stream width was 30 feet and the average depth was 1.5 feet. Water velocities were generally 1 foot per second or less, and the volume of flow was estimated to be 75 c.f.s. Water temperature was 33°F. The surrounding terrain is pastureland, and stream bank vegetation is primarily grass. Length of the area is about 7_stream miles. The spawning potential of-this stream section was considered to be poor. This was based on the low percentage of riffles, poor spawning gravel, slow water velocities, and inadequate cover and resting pools. Zim's Plunge to U.S. 95 highway bridge. This section exhibited a slightly steeper gradient, resulting in faster water velocities (1.5 to 3.0 feet per second). The stream bottom contained fine gravel and sand in pool areas and small gravel (½ to 3 inches in diameter) in the riffles. Average stream width was 20 feet with an average depth of 1 foot. Discharge below Goose Creek was estimated to be 55 c.f.s. The two forks of Goose Creek enter this section of the river but could not be surveyed because of ice conditions. The surrounding terrain is pastureland
Recommended publications
  • C&P IDAHO4 8X11 2004.Indd
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Camping and Picnicking on the Service Intermountain Region National Forests of Ogden, Utah Southern Idaho & Western Wyoming 95 90 Lewiston IDAHO Salmon MONTANA 93 55 95 Challis 20 14 93 21 15 20 20 26 Jackson Boise Idaho Falls 20 20 84 Pocatello 189 86 30 Twin Falls Big Piney 93 Montpelier 189 WYOMING 84 15 Kemmerer 80 UTAH 30 30 Ogden 80 Evanston THE NATIONAL FORESTS America’s Great 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 4 Outdoors 1 in your multiple-use National partners in seeing that the National This Land is Your Land Forests. Forests fulfi ll and magnify the intent This guide is provided as an wildernesses, adventure, solitude, For those who prefer a less of their creation. Your partnership introduction to the the camping and scenery enough to saturate your robust trip, how about a scenic drive, decrees the right to enjoy, but not and picnicking opportunities in the aesthetic cravings. photography excursion, bird watch- destroy, any facet of the National National Forests of the Intermoun- A National Forest is more than ing, or a picnic? All these experi- Forest. tain Region. More detailed infor- trees and camping, hiking, fi shing, ences–and more–await you. Forest Supervisors, District mation can be obtained from each and hunting. You can enjoy the Woodcutting, a popular family Rangers, their staffs, and volunteers, National Forest offi ce listed. Two magnifi cence of the mountains; the outing in the Intermountain Region, live and work in the National Forests. key documents that you may wish serenity of the wilderness; the thrill starts early in the summer and con- They will answer your questions, to request are the “National Forest of skiing and kayaking; the miracles tinues through the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................................... 1 3 PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Project Area ............................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2.1 Current Permit ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.2 Grazing System ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.3 Conservation Measures ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2.4 Changes From Existing Management ................................................................................... 5 3.2.5 Resource Objectives and Standards .................................................................................... 6 3.2.6 Annual Grazing Use indicators .............................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2004
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2004 Ellis River Challis Fork Salmon Yankee Squaw T h o m Valley p s o n Creek Creek Creek Creek Elk Salmon River Stanley Iron Creek Salmon River Redfish Lake Obsidian July Salmon of Creek Fourth Champion Creek River Alturas Fork Lake Pole Creek Creek East Creek Beaver Smiley Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5212 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Instream Flow Characterization of Upper Salmon River Basin Streams, Central Idaho, 2004 By Terry R. Maret, Jon E. Hortness, and Douglas S. Ott Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5212 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Maret, T.R., Hortness, J.E., and Ott, D.S., 2005, Instream flow characterization of upper Salmon River Basin streams, Central Idaho, 2004: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Habitat Evaluation for Offsite Mitigation Record This Is Invisible Text
    June 1985 IDAHO HABITAT EVALUATION FOR OFFSITE MITIGATION RECORD THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Annual Report FY 1984 DOE/BP-13381-1 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views of this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This document should be cited as follows: Petrosky, C.E., T.B. Holubetz - Idaho Department of Fish & Game, Idaho Habitat Evaluation for Offsite Mitigation Record, Annual Report FY 1984, Report to Bonneville Power Administration, Contract No. 1984BP13381, Project No. 198300700, 207 electronic pages (BPA Report DOE/BP-13381-1) This report and other BPA Fish and Wildlife Publications are available on the Internet at: http://www.efw.bpa.gov/cgi-bin/efw/FW/publications.cgi For other information on electronic documents or other printed media, contact or write to: Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife Division P.O. Box 3621 905 N.E. 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97208-3621 Please include title, author, and DOE/BP number in the request. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 METHODS AND MATERIALS . 4 Evaluation Approach 4 Methods .
    [Show full text]
  • 1967, Al and Frances Randall and Ramona Hammerly
    The Mountaineer I L � I The Mountaineer 1968 Cover photo: Mt. Baker from Table Mt. Bob and Ira Spring Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during March and April by The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington, 98111. Clubroom is at 719Y2 Pike Street, Seattle. Subscription price monthly Bulletin and Annual, $5.00 per year. The Mountaineers To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of North­ west America; To make expeditions into these regions m fulfill­ ment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all lovers of outdoor life. EDITORIAL STAFF Betty Manning, Editor, Geraldine Chybinski, Margaret Fickeisen, Kay Oelhizer, Alice Thorn Material and photographs should be submitted to The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington 98111, before November 1, 1968, for consideration. Photographs must be 5x7 glossy prints, bearing caption and photographer's name on back. The Mountaineer Climbing Code A climbing party of three is the minimum, unless adequate support is available who have knowledge that the climb is in progress. On crevassed glaciers, two rope teams are recommended. Carry at all times the clothing, food and equipment necessary. Rope up on all exposed places and for all glacier travel. Keep the party together, and obey the leader or majority rule. Never climb beyond your ability and knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemhi County, Idaho
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BUIJLETIN 528 GEOLOGY AND ORE DEPOSITS 1 OF LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO BY JOSEPH B. UMPLEBY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Outline of report.......................................................... 11 Introduction.............................................................. 15 Scope of report......................................................... 15 Field work and acknowledgments...................................... 15 Early work............................................................ 16 Geography. .........> ....................................................... 17 Situation and access.........................--.-----------.-..--...-.. 17 Climate, vegetation, and animal life....................----.-----.....- 19 Mining................................................................ 20 General conditions.......... 1..................................... 20 History..............................-..............-..........:... 20 Production.................................,.........'.............. 21 Physiography.............................................................. 22 Existing topography.................................................... 22 Physiographic development............................................. 23 General features...............................................'.... 23 Erosion surface.................................................... 25 Correlation............. 1..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan Summary
    Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan Summary Introduction This recovery plan (Plan) serves as a blueprint for the protection and restoration of Snake River Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Snake River Sockeye Salmon were listed as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1991. The listing was reaffirmed in 2005. The species remains at risk of extinction. Today, the last remaining Snake River Sockeye Salmon spawn in Sawtooth Valley lakes, high in the Salmon River drainage of central Idaho in the Snake River basin. While very few Sockeye Salmon currently follow an anadromous life cycle, the small remnant run of the historical population migrates 900 miles downstream from the Sawtooth Valley through the Salmon, Snake and Columbia Rivers to the ocean (Figure ES-1). After one to three years in the ocean, they return to the Sawtooth Valley as adults, passing once again through these mainstem rivers and through eight major federal dams, four on the Columbia River and four on the lower Snake River. Anadromous Sockeye Salmon returning to Redfish Lake in Idaho’s Sawtooth Valley travel a greater distance from the sea (900 miles) to a higher elevation (6,500 feet) than any other Sockeye Salmon population. They are the southernmost population of Sockeye Salmon in the world. Figure ES-1. Snake River Sockeye Salmon migration corridor from Columbia River estuary to Sawtooth Valley lakes. Before the turn of the twentieth century, an estimated 150,000 Sockeye Salmon returned annually to the Snake River basin. Sockeye Salmon ascended the Snake River to the Wallowa River basin in northeastern Oregon and the Payette and Salmon River basins in Idaho to spawn in natural lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE STANLEY, IDAHO—The Sawtooth
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE STANLEY, IDAHO—The Sawtooth Society’s Austin Kraal Memorial Volunteer program has ended its third season of volunteer work with miles of trails cleared, old fences clipped, thousands of weeds pulled and scores of campsites cleaned. All told, there were more than 1,200 hours of boots-on-the-ground work completed by the Austin Kraal Memorial youth and adult volunteers who all gave back to the Sawtooth National Recreation Area (NRA) in a big way this season. Courtesy photo A group of boys from Cherry Gulch in Emmett, Idaho work together to build a logworm fence along the shore of Alturas Lake. The fence will help keep foot traffic away from badly eroding banks. “I’ve backpacked quite a bit in the Sawtooths, and I saw this program as an opportunity to give back to a special place that I love,” said Will Gattiker, a youth volunteer who participated in the program. The volunteer program is more than a plan to help maintain and enhance the Sawtooth NRA, it gives people a chance to experience the Sawtooths in a different and more meaningful way. “I’ve had experiences in the outdoors since I was very young,” Gattiker said. “But this was different and special in that I was able to share it with a great variety of people—people I might not otherwise have had the opportunity to camp and work beside.” Courtesy photo Kids from The Boise Parks and Recreation and Foothills Learning Center Sawtooth Camp pull Spotted Knapweed on the steep banks of the Salmon River.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho: Lewis Clark Byway Guide.Pdf
    The Lewis and Clark Backcountry Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho Meriwether Lewis’s journal entry on August 18, 1805 —American Philosophical Society The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway and Adventure Road is a 36 mile loop drive through a beautiful and historic landscape on the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail. The mountains, evergreen forests, high desert canyons, and grassy foothills look much the same today as when the Lewis and Clark Expedition passed through in 1805. THE PUBLIC LANDS CENTER Salmon-Challis National Forest and BLM Salmon Field Office 1206 S. Challis Street / Salmon, ID 83467 / (208)756-5400 BLM/ID/GI-15/006+1220 Getting There The portal to the Byway is Tendoy, Idaho, which is nineteen miles south of Salmon on Idaho Highway 28. From Montana, exit from I-15 at Clark Canyon Reservoir south of Dillon onto Montana Highway 324. Drive west past Grant to an intersection at the Shoshone Ridge Overlook. If you’re pulling a trailer or driving an RV with a passenger vehicle in tow, it would be a good idea to leave your trailer or RV at the overlook, which has plenty of parking, a vault toilet, and interpretive signs. Travel road 3909 west 12 miles to Lemhi Pass. Please respect private property along the road and obey posted speed signs. Salmon, Idaho, and Dillon, Montana, are full- service communities. Limited services are available in Tendoy, Lemhi, and Leadore, Idaho and Grant, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species (MIS) Were
    2009 Sawtooth Aquatic Management Indicator Species Monitoring Report John Chatel – Forest Aquatics Program Manager Dan Kenney – Zone Fisheries Biologist Scott Vuono – SNRA Aquatic Ecologist Introduction In order to evaluate the effects of management practices on fisheries and wildlife resources, the U.S. Forest Service monitors select species whose population trends are believed to reflect the effects of management activities on Forest ecosystems. These species are termed “management indicator species” (MIS) and the rationale for MIS monitoring is outlined in federal regulation 36 CFR 219.19. “In order to estimate the effects of each alternative on fish and wildlife populations, certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the area shall be identified and selected as management indicator species and the reasons for their selection will be stated. These species shall be selected because their population changes are believed to indicate the effects of management activities.” “Population trends of the management indicator species will be monitored and relationships to habitat changes determined.” An important criterion integral to the MIS foundation is that monitoring results must allow managers to answer questions about population trends. Historically, monitoring of habitat was 1 used a surrogate for direct quantification of MIS populations. However, recent court cases (Sierra Club v. Martin, 168 F.3d 1 (11th Cir. 1999)) have ruled that assessing changes in habitat will no longer be accepted as a substitute for direct monitoring of populations. The Forest Service has an obligation to collect and analyze quantitative population trend data at both the Forest-plan and project level. In response to issues raised by court challenges, the Sawtooth, Boise, and Payette National Forests revisited aquatic MIS species for the Draft Forest Plan EIS to determine if the population data were sufficient to determine trend at the Forest scale.
    [Show full text]
  • BPA Partners with Idaho to Secure More Than 4600 Acres to Benefit Fish
    BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Fact Sheet July 2015 BPA partners with Idaho to secure more than 4,600 acres to benefit fish Habitat conservation – PURPOSE: The Bonneville Power Administration is partially funding the purchase of a conservation public notice easement that would permanently protect nearly DATE: July 2015 10 miles of in-stream and riparian habitat near the town of Leadore in Lemhi County, Idaho. LOCATION: Leadore, Lemhi County, Idaho (see map on page 4) This acquisition will partially mitigate the impacts to salmon and steelhead from the construction, ACRES: 4,682 (nearly 10 miles of in-stream and inundation and continued operation of federal riparian habitat along the mainstem of the Lemhi River) hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River and Snake © ILONA MCCARTY OPEN VIEW PHOTOGRAPHY the elimination of a ditch on the Lemhi River and participation in a 72-hour high flow event during which water withdrawals will be curtailed to mimic or enhance channel forming and maintaining events. When combined with similar efforts on neighboring conservation easements on the Lemhi River, these actions will result in 100 cubic feet per second flowing through more than 25 miles of main river and tributary habitat. These flushing flows will help increase egg and smolt survival over time as gravels are consistently washed clean for successive brood years. SPECIES BENEFITED: Snake River spring/summer Headwaters of the Lemhi River at the confluence of Texas and chinook, steelhead Eighteen Mile creeks. Leadore Land Partners Ranch, 2012 TYPES OF LAND: In-stream and riparian River basins. The conservation of habitat is one TYPE OF ACTION: BPA is working with the Idaho component of a broader, comprehensive strategy to Office of Species Conservation and the Lemhi Regional improve conditions for fish at all stages of their life in Land Trust to negotiate a conservation easement on the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program Research Element
    SNAKE RIVER SOCKEYE SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM RESEARCH ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT January 1, 2004—December 31, 2004 Prepared by: Catherine Willard, Senior Fisheries Research Biologist Mike Peterson, Fisheries Research Biologist Kurtis Plaster, Senior Fisheries Technician Jason Castillo, Fisheries Technician Dan Baker, Hatchery Manager II Jeff Heindel, Assistant Hatchery Manager Jeremy Redding, Fish Culturist and Paul Kline, Principal Fisheries Research Biologist IDFG Report Number 06-01 January 2006 SNAKE RIVER SOCKEYE SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM RESEARCH ELEMENT 2004 Annual Project Progress Report Part 1—Project Overview Part 2—Oncorhynchus nerka Population Monitoring Part 3—Redfish and Stanley Lakes Sport Fishery Investigations Part 4—Sockeye Salmon Smolt Monitoring and Evaluation Part 5—Sockeye Salmon Spawning Investigations and Unmarked Juvenile Out-migrant Monitoring Part 6—Parental Lineage Investigations Part 7—Proximate Analysis for Juvenile Fish Quality Assessment Part 8—Predator Surveys By Catherine Willard Mike Peterson Kurtis Plaster Jason Castillo Dan Baker Jeff Heindel Jeremy Redding Paul Kline Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 To: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97283-3621 Project Number 1991-07-200 Contract Number 5342 IDFG Report Number 06-01 January 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]