DOCSLIB.ORG

Juneteenth at Wikipedia.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juneteenth at Wikipedia.Pdf Juneteenth at Wikipedia Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight @Rosiestep | Visiting Scholar, Northeastern University | V-P, Wikimedia DC | Co-founder, Women in Red Zoom training event via AfroCROWD & Women in Red | 06.20.2020 | CC-BY-SA-4.0 1 Wikipedia ● An encyclopedia ● Neutral point of view ● Free content ● Respect and civility ● No firm rules 2 Wiki… huh? ● ‘Wiki’: model of openly-editable content ● Hawaiian word meaning fast/quick ● 1995: coined by Ward Cunningham, inventor of the editing language used by Wikipedia editors 3 Jimmy Wales “Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing.” -Jimmy Wales 4 Wikimedia Foundation 5 Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emancipation_Day_celebration_-_1900-06-19.jpg (Mrs. Charles Stephenson (Grace Murray) / Public domain) 6 Wikidata 7 8 9 Volunteers ● “... 77 percent of Wikipedia articles are written by just one percent of Wikipedia editors…” (Daniel Oberhaus, "Motherboard, Tech by Vice", 7 Nov 2017) ● “Just 3,541 Wikipedia editors are considered ‘very active’, and very few of them are female.” (“New https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AfroCROW Statesman”, 8 Jan 2019) D_Team_at_the_first_AfroCROWD_Summit_Brookly n_NY,_1-2019.png (Shanluan / CC BY-SA) 10 Policies, guidelines, best practices ● https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies 11 Notability (WP:N) ● “If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.” 12 Reliable sources (WP:RS) ● Sources should be “published”, not “oral”. ● Online sources are convenient, but sources do not have to be available online. ● Sources in any language are acceptable. 13 Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV) ● All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view. 14 Paid editing (WP:PAID) ● Issues: ○ Trust ○ Disclosure 15 Conflict of interest (WP:COI) ● Disclose any potential conflicts of interest on your userpage. ● Don’t create an account in the name of your organization. 16 Conflict between editors ● Wikipedia can get frustrating. ● Take criticism as a learning opportunity. ● Wikipedia always wins. Don’t bet against Wikipedia. 17 Gender gap: editors 18 Who is editing Wikipedia? Who isn’t? 19 Women editors 2010 United Nations University study 12.6% 2011 Wikipedia Editor Survey 8.5% 2011 Wikimedia Foundation goal set: 25% women editors by 2015 2015 No survey 2018 Wikimedia Community 9% Engagement Insights survey https://w.wiki/GUp 20 “Conflict, confidence, or criticism” https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Movement_strategy_discussion_at_WikiConference_North_America_2016_ -_2.jpg (Pax Ahimsa Gethen / CC BY-SA) 21 Gender gap: content 22 23 The example of another encyclopedia ● “...Diccionario biográfico, geograf́ico e histórico de Venezuela, -Ramón Armando Rodriguez (1957) ● 3.6% https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roger_Ba mkin_y_Rosie_Stephenson-Goodknight_en_Wikiman ia_2015_22.JPG (Luisalvaz / CC BY-SA) 24 % of women’s biographies on Wikipedia ● Oct 2014: 15.5% http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.02341v1.pdf ● Jun 2020: 18.46% http://whgi.wmflabs.org/gender-by-language.html 25 % of women’s scientist biographies on Wikipedia ● https://www.denelezh.org/gender-gap/ 26 Article anatomy 27 Exploring tabs: Article history Edit summary Editor Date username 28 Exploring tabs: talk page, community discussion 29 Lead paragraphs Main photo or Infobox Lead paragraphs placement 30 References; inline citations 31 Categories 32 Decide on a ‘username’ that is not your institution's real name. Note that sharing an account is not allowed in Wikipedia, so you should not create an account for your organization as a whole. Create your 1. Click on the blue link "Create Account" in the top right corner. 2. Click on the blue link "Create One" in Wikipedia the sign in box. 3. Fill out the information on the page account (email is not necessary) and click the "Create Account" button. 4. Your username will now appear in red in the top right corner. 33 AfroCROWD Juneteenth 2020 editathon page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/AfroCROWD/Juneteenth2020 Click here. 34 Thank you Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, “Juneteenth at Wikipedia”, 2020, Zoom training event via AfroCROWD & Women in Red, CC-BY-SA-4.0 35.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Contribute Climate Change Information to Wikipedia : a Guide
    HOW TO CONTRIBUTE CLIMATE CHANGE INFORMATION TO WIKIPEDIA Emma Baker, Lisa McNamara, Beth Mackay, Katharine Vincent; ; © 2021, CDKN This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly credited. Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), qui permet l’utilisation, la distribution et la reproduction sans restriction, pourvu que le mérite de la création originale soit adéquatement reconnu. IDRC Grant/ Subvention du CRDI: 108754-001-CDKN knowledge accelerator for climate compatible development How to contribute climate change information to Wikipedia A guide for researchers, practitioners and communicators Contents About this guide .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Why Wikipedia is an important tool to communicate climate change information .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Enhancing the quality of online climate change information ............................................. 8 1.2 Sharing your work more widely ......................................................................................................8 1.3 Why researchers should
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Wikimedia and Why New Zealand Museums Should Pay Attention
    The Future of Wikimedia and Why New Zealand Museums Should Pay Attention Susan Tolich On the 21st of May it was announced that Mike Dickison will be assuming the position as Aotearoa’s frst Wikipedia-at-large. Tis new role will entail several placements at GLAM institutions around the country where Dickison will act as a ‘Wikipedian in Residence.’ Tis position does not involve editing Wikipedia on behalf of the organisations but focuses on training staf in how to contribute and engage with all parts of Wikimedia and its editing community. Wikipedia is just one of the projects run by the non-proft Wikimedia Foundation; others include Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Troughout his career Dickison has had years of experience advocating for Wikipedia to be used in the GLAM sector and has hosted various events to improve the representation of New Zealand endemic species and female scientists on the site.1 While Dickson is the frst Wikipedian-at-large in New Zealand he is part of a much larger global movement which works towards creating a freely accessed ‘sum of all knowledge.’ Wikimedians have partnered with GLAM institutions around the world since 2010 with the mission of ‘connecting audiences to open knowledge, ideas and creativity on a global scale.’2 Other Wikipedian-in-residence projects have ranged from creating documentary photography of Carpathian folk lore, to upskilling librarians in the Ivory Coast to be able to promote their heritage using Wikimedia platforms. It was eforts such as these that also delivered Te Metropolitan Museum 1 Mike Dickison, “New Zealand Wikimedian at large,” Giant Flightless Bird (Blog), 21 May 2018, http://www.giantfightlessbirds.com/2018/05/new-zealand-wikipedian-at-large/ 2 Katherine Maher and Loic Tallon, “Wikimedia and the Met: a shared digital vision,” Medium, 20 April 2018, https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/wikimedia-and -the-met-a-shared-digital-vision-f91b59eab2e9.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikimedia and Universities | Martin Poulter and Nick Sheppard
    Insights – 33, 2020 Wikimedia and universities | Martin Poulter and Nick Sheppard Wikimedia and universities: contributing to the global commons in the Age of Disinformation In its first 30 years the world wide web has revolutionized the information environment. However, its impact has been negative as well as positive, through corporate misuse of personal data and due to its potential for enabling the spread of disinformation. As a large-scale collaborative platform funded through charitable donations, with a mission to provide universal free access to knowledge as a public good, Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world. This paper explores the role of Wikipedia in the information ecosystem where it occupies a unique role as a bridge between informal discussion and scholarly publication. We explore how it relates to the broader Wikimedia ecosystem, through structured data on Wikidata for instance, and openly licensed media on Wikimedia Commons. We consider the potential benefits for universities in the areas of information literacy and research impact, and investigate the extent to which universities in the UK and their libraries are engaging strategically with Wikimedia, if at all. Keywords Wikipedia; Wikimedia; Wikidata; information literacy; research impact; strategy MARTIN POULTER NICK SHEPPARD Open Research Website Editor and Advisor Technical Developer University of Leeds University of Bristol Introduction ‘The original idea of the web was that it should be a collaborative space … by writing something together [people] could iron out misunderstanding.’ Tim Berners-Lee1 The world wide web has both fulfilled and fallen short of its early promise. Its impact on how we access and share information has been revolutionary.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikimania Stockholm Program.Xlsx
    Wikimania Stockholm Program Aula Magna Södra Huset combined left & right A wing classroom. Plenary sessions 1200 Szymborska 30 halls Room A5137 B wing lecture hall. Murad left main hall 700 Maathai 100 Room B5 B wing classroom. Arnold right main hall 600 Strickland 30 Room B315 classroom on top level. B wing classroom. Gbowee 30 Menchú 30 Room B487 Officially Kungstenen classroom on top level. B wing classroom. Curie 50 Tu 40 Room B497 Officially Bergsmann en open space on D wing classroom. Karman 30 Ostrom 30 middle level Room D307 D wing classroom. Allhuset Ebadi 30 Room D315 Hall. Officially the D wing classroom. Yousafzai 120 Lessing 70 Rotunda Room D499 D wing classroom. Juristernas hus Alexievich 100 Room D416 downstairs hall. Montalcini 75 Officially the Reinholdssalen Williams upstairs classroom 30 Friday 16 August until 15:00 All day events: Community Village Hackathon upstairs in Juristernas Wikitongues language Building Aula Magna Building 08:30 – Registration 08:30 – 10:00 10:00 Welcome session & keynote 10:00 – Michael Peter Edson 10:00 – 12:00 12:00 co-founder and Associate Director of The Museum for the United Nations — UN Live 12:00 – Lunch 12:00 – 13:00 13:00 & meetups Building Aula Magna Allhuset Juristernas hus Södra Huset Building Murad Arnold Curie Karman Yousafzai Montalcini Szymborska Maathai Strickland Menchú Tu Ostrom Ebadi Lessing Room A5137 B5 B315 B487 B497 D307 D315 D499 Room Space Free Knowledge and the Sustainable RESEARCH STRATEGY EDUCATION GROWTH TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Challenges and Opportunities of a Feminist Rhetorical Approach for Wikipedia-Based Writing Instruction in First-Year Composition
    2/4/2021 CF 45: A Feminist Rhetorical Approach for Wikipedia-based Writing Instruction by Jialei Jiang and Matthew A. Vetter Composition Forum 45, Fall 2020 http://compositionforum.com/issue/45/ Addressing the Challenges and Opportunities of a Feminist Rhetorical Approach for Wikipedia-based Writing Instruction in First-Year Composition [http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&username=compforum] Jialei Jiang and Matthew A. Vetter Abstract: Wikipedia’s gender gaps are both well-established and well-challenged, and while Wikipedia- based assignments have become more common in composition, teacher-scholars have not fully explored the opportunities for feminist pedagogy offered by the encyclopedia. This article reports on a teacher research study designed to examine the efficacy of the feminist rhetorical approach for understanding critical literacy learning through Wikipedia-based assignments in First-Year Composition (FYC). Findings from student forum posts, surveys, and reflection essays suggest that, despite its benefits, the Wikipedia assignment has been met with challenges that hinder students from making contributions critically and effectively, especially as they struggle to assume agency and criticality in the FYC classroom. By identifying and addressing these challenges, we seek to offer alternative approaches to teaching feminist rhetorical inquiries in FYC, and to expand the current critical practices in Wikipedia-based writing instruction. Introduction In what has by now become a widely-cited study, the Wikimedia Foundation found that less than 10% of Wikipedia editors identify as women, and less than 1% as transgender (Glott et al.). The encyclopedia that “anyone can edit,” according to this research, is primarily edited by an overwhelmingly male demographic.
    [Show full text]
  • 16€€€€Toward a Wikipedia for and from Us
    Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 16 Toward a Wikipedia For and From Us All Adele Godoy Vrana, Anasuya Sengupta, Siko Bouterse Published on: Oct 15, 2020 Updated on: Nov 16, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 16 Toward a Wikipedia For and From Us All To build a Wikipedia that reflects the full breadth and depth of humanity, we must deconstruct the myths that allow misogyny, racism, colonialism, and other forms of oppression to flourish in our communities and build new practices for the next twenty years. As Whose Knowledge? cofounders, we draw on our experiences to offer paths forward. We love Wikipedia. As readers, and as contributors. But we also hate what it can do to many of us from marginalized communities around the world. Most Wikipedians find it hard to accept that a truly inspiring model of peer production can sit alongside misogyny, racism, and colonialism, but this has indeed been our experience of Wikipedia’s first twenty years. Don’t get us wrong; we do love Wikipedia. But for us, our passion for the projects translates into tough love. We believe in speaking up about some of the critical issues of marginalization that have been lurking, invisible, or silenced over the past twenty years. And we believe that acting to change this status quo will make Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement more powerful and relevant over the next twenty. We were initially drawn to the encyclopedia and the movement several years ago as feminists, scholars, organizers, and people who are curious about the many worlds we inhabit.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Wikipedia Often Overlooks Stories of Women in History Lara Nicosia Rochester Institute of Technology
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Articles 3-16-2018 Why Wikipedia Often Overlooks Stories of Women in History Lara Nicosia Rochester Institute of Technology Tamar Carroll Rochester Institute of Technology This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/article Part of the History of Gender Commons, and the Information Literacy Commons Recommended Citation Nicosia, Lara and Carroll, Tamar, "Why Wikipedia Often Overlooks Stories of Women in History" (2018). The Conversation,Accessed from http://scholarworks.rit.edu/article/1847 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. https://theconversation.com/why-wikipedia-often-overlooks-stories-of-women-in-history-92555 Academic rigor, journalistic flair Why Wikipedia often overlooks stories of women in history March 16, 2018 6.25am EDT Less than a third of biographical entries on Wikipedia are about women. aradaphotography/shutterstock.com Why Wikipedia often overlooks stories of women in history March 16, 2018 6.25am EDT Movements like #MeToo are drawing increased attention to the systemic discrimination Authors facing women in a range of professional fields, from Hollywood and journalism to banking and government. Discrimination is also a problem on user-driven sites like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the fifth most popular website worldwide. In January, the English-language version of the online Tamar Carroll Associate Professor of History, Rochester encyclopedia had over 7.3 billion page views, more than 2000 percent higher than other Institute of Technology online reference sites such as IMDb or Dictionary.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Women in Mathematics Into Wikipedia
    Writing Women in Mathematics into Wikipedia Marie A. Vitulli University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1222 October 20, 2017 Abstract In this article I reflect upon the problemsconnected with writing women in mathematics into Wikipedia. I discuss some of the current projects and efforts aimed at increasing the visibility of women in mathe- matics on Wikipedia. I present the rules for creating a biography on Wikipedia and relate my personal experiences in creating such articles. I hope to provide the reader with the background and resources to start editing existing Wikipedia articles and the confidence to create new articles. I would also like to encourage existing editors to look out for and protect new articles about women mathematicians and submit new articles. 1 Introduction The twin problems of the paucity of women subjects and scarcity of women editors on Wikipedia are well known but no solutions are on the horizon. We can nevertheless take small steps to address these problems. In response to my concerns about these problems and in order to gain first-hand experience, I became a Wikipedia editor in 2013. In this article I will update and expand upon my article Writing Women in Mathematics into Wikipedia, which appeared in the May–June 2014 issue of the Association for Women in Mathematics Newsletter [8]. Since 2013 some things have improved on Wikipedia and others have remained more or less the same. I will first report on these and then relate some of my personal experiences as a Wikipedia editor. Briefly, this is how this article is organized.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    OLA Quarterly Volume 25 Number 2 Oregon Libraries are for Everyone: Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion 10-28-2019 Writing African American History Into Wikipedia Laurie M. Bridges Oregon State University Diana Park Oregon State University Tiah K. Edmunson-Morton Oregon State University Recommended Citation Bridges, L. M., Park, D., & Edmunson-Morton, T. K. (2019). Writing African American History Into Wikipedia. OLA Quarterly, 25(2), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1987 © 2019 by the author(s). OLA Quarterly is an official publication of the egonOr Library Association | ISSN 1093-7374 Writing African American History Into Wikipedia by Laurie Bridges LAURIE BRIDGES is an Instruction and Outreach Instruction and Outreach Librarian, librarian at Oregon State University. She is the Oregon State University [email protected] library liaison for international programs and liberal arts. In 2019, she taught a two-credit Wikipedia and undergraduate course; co-authored a column for the Diana Park Journal of Academic Librarianship about Wikipedia; Science Librarian, participated in the international Wikipedia + Oregon State University Education conference; and is currently co-researching [email protected] librarian use of Wikipedia in Spain as an outreach and and instruction tool. She received an MS from Oregon State University in College Student Services Tiah Edmunson-Morton Administration with a minor in Women Studies and Director of the Oregon Hops and Brewing Archives, her MLIS from the University of Washington. Oregon State University Diana Park is a Science librarian at Oregon State [email protected] University. She started at OSU in the fall of 2018 and immediately joined the team in planning OSU’s first Wikipedia editathon.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Women in Mathematics Into Wikipedia
    COMMUNICATION Writing Women in Mathematics into Wikipedia Marie A. Vitulli Communicated by Harriet Pollatsek The Paucity of Women Subjects ABSTRACT. In this article I reflect upon the problems connected with writing women in mathematics into There have been numerous allegations that Wikipedia Wikipedia. I hope to persuade the reader to start editing suffers from systemic gender bias with respect to both existing Wikipedia articles and to create new articles. content and editors and that the attempts to increase 1 I also hope to persuade existing editors to contribute women’s participation have failed. new articles about women mathematicians. One disturbing manifestation of the underrepresenta- tion of women in Wikipedia is the dearth of biographies of notable women. According to WikiProject Women in Red, The twin problems of the paucity of women subjects and only 16.36% of the biographies in English Wikipedia were scarcity of women editors on Wikipedia are well known, about women as of August 7, 2016. This is up from just but no solutions are on the horizon. We can nevertheless over 15% in November 2014. Wikipedia has guidelines on take small steps to address these problems. In response academic notability (also called the professor test) that to my concerns about these problems and in order to gain a subject must meet to merit a Wikipedia page. The first first-hand experience, I became a Wikipedia editor in 2013. two of the nine criteria of academic notability are: the In the first section, I discuss gender bias on Wikipedia and person’s research has made significant impact in their the underrepresentation of women subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Women in Engineering on Wikipedia
    Science Museum Group Journal The history of women in engineering on Wikipedia Journal ISSN number: 2054-5770 This article was written by Alice White 11-07-2018 Cite as 10.15180; 181008 Research The history of women in engineering on Wikipedia Published in Autumn 2018, Issue 10 Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/181008 Abstract This paper explores the representation of the history of women in engineering as it appears on the online encyclopaedia, Wikipedia. Using biography pages on women engineers for a high-level quantitative overview, and the ‘History of women in engineering’ page as a specific example for qualitative examination, this research highlights inequalities in how women engineers are represented compared with men engineers. There are significantly fewer Wikipedia biography articles on women engineers compared with men engineers, and those articles are far less central and findable, with fewer incoming links. The article page on the ‘History of women in engineering’ is of poor quality and is flagged as such to readers. Here, the under-representation of women engineers on Wikipedia is set in the specific context of Wikipedia. The context of societal differences beyond the internet is also explored. The paper concludes by discussing practical attempts to redress the imbalance, and challenges to consider in planning future efforts. Component DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/181008/001 Keywords Women engineers, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, gender gap, encyclopaedia, history of engineering, systemic bias, women in STEM Introduction: the ‘gender gap’ Wikipedia has a ‘women problem’ (Gleik, 2013). Engineering also has a women problem (Peters, 2018). Sadly, biases in the real world combine with biases in the online world, and the result is that women engineers are nowhere near as visible online as they should be.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    OLA Quarterly Volume 25 Number 2 Oregon Libraries are for Everyone: Article 1 Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion 10-28-2019 Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Recommended Citation (2019). Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. OLA Quarterly, 25(2), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.7710/ 1093-7374.25.02 © 2019 by the author(s). OLA Quarterly is an official publication of the egonOr Library Association | ISSN 1093-7374 Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Erratum Removal of name of person who did not work on issue This full issue is available in OLA Quarterly: https://commons.pacificu.edu/olaq/vol25/iss2/1 OLA Quarterly Summer 2019 Vol 25 • No 2 OLA Quarterly Oregon Library Association Summer 2019 http://www.olaweb.org Vol 25 • No 2 ISSN 1093-7374 The OLA Quarterly is an official publication of the Oregon Library Association. Please refer questions and input regarding the Quarterly to: OLA Quarterly Editor-in-Chief: Charles Wood [email protected] Graphic Production: Julie Weiss Tobias Weiss Design [email protected] www.tobiasweissdesign.com The views expressed in this issue do not necessarily represent the views of the Oregon Library Association. Upcoming Issue Fall 2019 Youth Services Take Over OLA Quarterly! COVER: Original artwork by Rebecca McCorkindale. See: https://hafuboti.com/ If you would like to use this image at your library, please contact: [email protected] From the Guest Editor ELAINE HIRSCH Elaine is the Associate Director of Watzek Library at Lewis & Clark College and currently serves as OLA President. OLA has been the focus of Elaine’s professional service for over twenty years and she is constantly inspired by her innovative, socially conscious, and dedicated association colleagues.
    [Show full text]