Imnografia Liturgică Bizantină. Perspective Critice” Poate Părea Provocator Prin Titlul Său

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Imnografia Liturgică Bizantină. Perspective Critice” Poate Părea Provocator Prin Titlul Său STUDIA OECUMENICA 13 STUDIA OECUMENICA Colecţie editată de Centrul de Cercetare Ecumenică Sibiu Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” Sibiu Editor: Prof. Dr. Aurel Pavel Consiliul ştiinţific: ÎPS Prof. Dr. Laurenţiu Streza, Arhiepiscopul Sibiului şi Mitropolitul Ardealului ES Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Christoph Klein, Episcop em. al Bisericii Evanghelice C.A. din România Prof. Dr. Stefan Tobler, Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” Sibiu Prof. Dr. Ioan-Vasile Leb, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Dr. Daniel Benga, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Martin Tamcke, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Prof. em. Dr. Dr. h.c. Viorel Ioniţă, Universitatea din Bucureşti Prof. Dr. Piero Coda, Istituto Universitario Sophia, Loppiano (Firenze) ISBN 978-606-37-0640-0 STUDIA OECUMENICA 13 IMNOGRAFIA LITURGICĂ BIZANTINĂ PERSPECTIVE CRITICE Volum editat de Alexandru Ioniţă Presa Universitară Clujeană 2019 Redactor: Alexandru Prelipcean Concept copertă: Lucian Niculescu Acest volum apare în cadrul proiectului de cercetare finanțat prin UEFISCIDI: „Dialogul iudeo-creştin în secolul XX între toleranță şi anti-semitism: documente, interpretări şi perspective pentru contextul creştin ortodox” (PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0699) Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai Presa Universitară Clujeană Str. Hasdeu nr. 51, 400371 Cluj-Napoca, România Tel./fax: (+40)-264-597.401 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.editura.ubbcluj.ro/ Cuprins Cuvânt înainte (Constantin Oancea) 7 Imnografia Ortodoxă și anti-iudaismul Michael Azar Matrice profetică şi paradox teologic: iudei şi iudaism în Săptămâna Mare şi în ritualurile pascale din Biserica Ortodoxă 11 Ioannis Mourtzios Fenomenul antisemitismului şi Biserica Ortodoxă. Textele liturgice ale Săptămânii Patimilor 39 Bogdan G. Bucur Retorica anti-iudaică din imnografia bizantină: Contextualizare exegetică şi teologică 52 Maica Éliane Poirot o.c.d. Permanenţa legământului şi textele liturgice bizantine 78 Alexandru Ioniţă Vin vechi în burdufuri noi: Romani 9-11 ca sursă de inspirație pentru noi creații imnografice 95 Biblie și Liturghie Derek Krueger Biblia penitenţială şi Canonul cel Mare al lui Andrei Criteanul 123 Doru Costache Înțelegeri bizantine: Cartea Facerii, teologie şi spiritualitate în Canonul cel Mare al Sfântului Andrei Cretanul 179 Alexandru Prelipcean Imaginea lui Moise în condacele Sfântului Roman Melodul. Scurte remarci 217 Andrew Mellas Emoţii liturgice în imnele bizantine: condacul „La biruinţa Crucii” al lui Roman Melodul 240 Alexandru Prelipcean Numirile lui Hristos în textul Prohodului Domnului 270 Cosmin Pricop Receptarea Scripturii în textele liturgice. Studiu de caz: slujba ortodoxă a Logodnei 284 Stelian Paşca-Tuşa Psalmul 119[118] – elogiul liric al Torei: de la Scriptură spre Liturghie 305 Cuvânt înainte Alexandru Ioniță continuă seria volumelor tematice Studia Oecumenica cu un număr interesant şi, cu siguranță, provo- cator pentru cititorii de teologie ortodoxă românească. Când afirm acest lucru am în vedere faptul că, în cadrul activității desfăşurate până acum la Centrul de Cercetare Ecumenică din Sibiu, Alexandru Ioniță a reuşit să lanseze dezbateri de idei şi să atragă personalități cunoscute la masa dialogului teologic. Mai mult, prin conferințele, prelegerile şi publicațiile desfăşurate sub tutela Centrului de Cercetare Ecumenică, o serie de cerce- tători tineri au aflat posibilitate de exprimare şi afirmare – ceea ce nu este chiar de la sine înțeles în mediul academic românesc. Volumul pe care editorul îl propune se remarcă prin faptul că abordează două teme de mare actualitate. Pe de-o parte, in- teresul pentru cercetarea izvoarelor liturgice ale Bisericii Ortodoxe este deplin justificat. Dacă pentru textul Sfintei Scripturi există ediții critice de mai bine de un secol, ediții critice pentru tex- tele cultului ortodox sunt cvasi-inexistente. Tezaurul liturgic ar fi rămas, pesemne, un fel de „cenuşăreasă” a teologiei ortodoxe, dacă nu ar fi existat în ultimii 50 de ani un aport complinitor la cunoaşterea cultului răsăritean venit din afara Ortodoxiei, în- deosebi din partea unor teologi romano-catolici. Volumul de față doreşte să contribuie la o cunoaştere sporită a textelor din cultul ortodox. Textele semnate de Derek Krueger, Alexandru Prelipcean, Andrew Mellas, Doru Costache, Alexandru Ioniță şi Cosmin Pricop cercetează interpretarea Bibliei în imnografia răsăriteană – o temă pe care semnatarul acestor rânduri o consi- deră prioritară în teologia ortodoxă contemporană. La fel de importantă mi se pare o altă temă, în jurul căre- ia gravitează textele scrise de Michael Azar, Ioannis Mourtzios, 7 Bogdan Bucur şi Maica Eliane Poirot. Ele discută prezența unor texte cu conținut antiiudaic în imnografia liturgică ortodo- xă. Apariția textelor respective într-un anumit moment al is- toriei este explicabilă, însă utilizarea lor astăzi produce reacții surprinzătoare, uneori fundamental opuse în rândul celor care le ascultă. Dacă unii cer imperativ excluderea lor din cultul Bisericii, pentru alții ele sunt intangibile şi, din păcate, există tineri pentru care asemenea texte justifică şi chiar alimentează atitudini antisemite în prezent. Starea de fapt demonstrează că în teologia românească persistă lipsa unei dezbateri serioase şi obiective asupra antisemitismului în România primei jumătăți a secolului XX. Peste acest subiect, rămas încă tabú, se suprapune o cunoaştere superficială a istoriei dramatice a Bisericii Ortodo- xe Române în perioada comunismului. Din păcate, evitarea dis- cutării celor două problematici nu face decât să alimenteze, în România de astăzi, evaluări maniheiste – de o parte, sau pasiuni anacronice – de cealaltă parte. Cred că volumul de față ar trebui lecturat sine ira et studio de ambele categorii: atât de partizanii cenzurării textelor antiiudaice, cât şi de cei care cochetează cu clişeele antiiudaice ale antisemitismului interbelic românesc. Volumul „Imnografia liturgică bizantină. Perspective critice” poate părea provocator prin titlul său. „A critica” se reduce, pen- tru mulți, la a înşira defecte, lipsuri. La origine însă, în limba greacă, kritēs înseamnă judecător; „a critica” presupune aşadar a analiza şi evalua obiectiv afirmații, cântărind argumentele. Este şi sensul în care autorii contribuțiilor din acest volum „critică” imnografia ortodoxă: analizează atent texte liturgice, pentru a le înțelege mai bine şi pentru a da posibilitatea cititorilor de a cunoaşte roadele muncii lor. La rândul lor, cititorii sunt invitați să analizeze şi să evalueze cele scrise, trecând peste prejudecăți şi reflectând asupra celor citite. Sine ira et studio! Constantin Oancea*, Sibiu, 10 octombrie 2019 * Pr. conf. dr. habil. Constantin Oancea, Facultatea de Teologie Ortodoxă „Sf. Andrei Șaguna”, Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu. 8 Imnografia ortodoxă și anti-iudaismul 2 10 Matrice profetică şi paradox teologic: iudei şi iudaism în Săptămâna Mare şi în ritualurile pascale din Biserica Ortodoxă MICHAEL G. AZAR* „Paştile cele sfinţite astăzi nouă S-au arătat. Paştile cele nouă şi sfinte, Paştile cele de taină, Paştile cele preacinstite, Paştile Hristos-Izbăvitorul; Paştile cele fără prihană, Paştile cele mari, Paştile credincioşilor, Paştile care au deschis nouă uşile raiului, Paştile cele ce sfinţesc pe toţi credincioşii” (Stihoavna de la Vecernia Paştilor). This article offers a textual examination of the references to Jews and Judaism in the Holy Week and Pascha services of the Orthodox Church. These references are considered in light of both the distinctive elements of Orthodox Christian theology and the scriptural backgrounds from which the liturgical texts draw. For the sake of clarity, the examination is limited to texts from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. Keywords: Pascha, Holy Week, Jewish-Christian relations, Eastern Orthodox Church Paştile: continuitatea naraţiunii Originile sărbătorii creştine ale Paştelui sunt bine cunoscute dar încă învăluite în incertitudine. Pe de o parte, este clar că sărbă- toarea s-a dezvoltat după Învierea lui Iisus ca o continuare a prac- ∗ Michael G. Azar, Profesor asociat de Teologie/Studii religioase la Scranton University. Email: [email protected]. Traducerea studiului s-a efec- tuat după originalul: „Prophetic Matrix and Theological Paradox: Jews and Judaism in the Holy Week and Pascha Observances of the Greek Orthodox Church”, în: Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations 10 (1/2015), [versiune on- line: https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/scjr/article/view/8658, 27 august 2019] de către Alexandru Prelipcean. Mulțumim editorilor jurnalului precum şi autorului pentru permisiunea de a publica acest text în limba română. 11 Michael G. Azar ticilor de Paşti ale comunităților evreieşti în diasporă şi în țara lui Israel1. Cum această sărbătoare a devenit o respectare anuală şi, mai târziu săptămânală, a urmaşilor evrei şi a poporului lui Iisus, este totuşi mai puțin uşor de explicat. Printre aspectele mai am- bigue ale acestor origini incerte se regăseşte reproiectarea treptată a subiectului comemorării în sărbătoare. După moartea Sa, mulți dintre adepții lui Iisus au continuat sărbătoarea Paştilor anual– pascha, în limba greacă–dar, pe măsură ce mişcarea a continuat să crească, focalizarea comemorării s-a extins în cele din urmă din- colo de trăirea în jurul evenimentelor exodului din Egipt spre iz- băvirea legată de Ierusalimul din primul secol. Odată cu trecerea timpului, accentul mozaic a rămas în comemorări, dar eliberarea adusă prin Hristos, „Paştile nostru” (1 Co 5, 7), a luat treptat po- ziţia centrală.
Recommended publications
  • BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By
    BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Without, However, Aspiring to Completeness. Paul
    Jonathan Shepard publications without, however, aspiring to completeness. Paul Stephenson has provided a valuable review-article of secondary literature published in a western language on the history of the early Hungarians, while his book on Byzantium’s Balkan frontier sets the activities of Hungarians in the tenth century within the broader context of imperial Byzantine diplomacy, emergent Balkan polities and the needs of nomads. Stephenson and Tóth, building on the earlier work of Macartney and Göckenjan, point to the strong probability that the lands east of the Tisza were occupied by the De administrando’s Kavars (Kabaroi). These, in turn, may be associated with the “Khalisioi”/Kaliz, a grouping of Khazar provenance known from later Hungarian sources to have occupied the valley of the Tisza in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Constantine VII could well have drawn heavily on Kavar informants for his contemporary data about the Hungarians’ lands, and the De administrando’s generous coverage of this grouping in comparison with the other units of Hungarians becomes the more understandable. In addition, a number of scholars have independently reached the conclusion that imperial attention to, knowledge about, and policy towards a region or people fluctuated drastically in accordance with the empire’s ever- changing needs and apprehensions of perils. Stephenson’s book shows how adaptable Byzantine administrative arrangements were after the defeat of the Rus and the Bulgarians in 971. Comparable flexibility was applied to the northern borderlands after final victory over the Bulgarians had been won in 1018, and in the territories reconquered from the eastern Muslims in the 960s and 970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Personal Non‐Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge
    Malevitas, Isias (2015) The formation of Byzantine views on Muslims during the 'Dark Century' (ca. 650‐ca.750). PhD thesis. SOAS University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/29809 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. THE FORMATION OF BYZANTINE VIEWS ON MUSLIMS DURING THE ‘DARK CENTURY’ (ca. 650-ca. 750) ILIAS MALEVITIS Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD 2015 Department of History SOAS, University of London 2 Abstract Byzantine-Muslim relations have long attracted the interest of scholars, mainly through the study of political-military events and polemic-theological attitudes. Recently, with the growth of interest in the rise of Islam and its place in the Late Antique Mediterranean world and culture, academic discussions have started to pay attention to a variety of issues and broaden their perspectives through inter-disciplinary approaches and ideas. The aim of this study is to discuss Byzantine views about the Muslims and the impact that the rise of Islam had upon the formation of these views in Christian thought (in the Byzantine and Middle Eastern areas), during the Byzantine ‘dark century’ (beginning of 7th c.-ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Garden Culture
    Byzantine Garden Culture Byzantine Garden Culture edited by Antony Littlewood, Henry Maguire, and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Washington, D.C. © 2002 Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University Washington, D.C. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Byzantine garden culture / edited by Antony Littlewood, Henry Maguire and Joachim Wolschke- Bulmahn. p. cm. Papers presented at a colloquium in November 1996 at Dumbarton Oaks. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) ISBN 0-88402-280-3 (alk. paper) 1. Gardens, Byzantine—Byzantine Empire—History—Congresses. 2. Byzantine Empire— Civilization—Congresses. I. Littlewood, Antony Robert. II. Maguire, Henry, 1943– III. Wolschke- Bulmahn, Joachim. SB457.547 .B97 2001 712'.09495—dc21 00-060020 To the memory of Robert Browning Contents Preface ix List of Abbreviations xi The Study of Byzantine Gardens: Some Questions and Observations from a Garden Historian 1 Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn The Scholarship of Byzantine Gardens 13 Antony Littlewood Paradise Withdrawn 23 Henry Maguire Byzantine Monastic Horticulture: The Textual Evidence 37 Alice-Mary Talbot Wild Animals in the Byzantine Park 69 Nancy P. Sevcenko Byzantine Gardens and Horticulture in the Late Byzantine Period, 1204–1453: The Secular Sources 87 Costas N. Constantinides Theodore Hyrtakenos’ Description of the Garden of St. Anna and the Ekphrasis of Gardens 105 Mary-Lyon Dolezal and Maria Mavroudi Khpopoii?a: Garden Making and Garden Culture in the Geoponika 159 Robert Rodgers Herbs of the Field and Herbs of the Garden in Byzantine Medicinal Pharmacy 177 John Scarborough The Vienna Dioskorides and Anicia Juliana 189 Leslie Brubaker viii Contents Possible Future Directions 215 Antony Littlewood Bibliography 231 General Index 237 Index of Greek Words 260 Preface It is with great pleasure that we welcome the reader to this, the first volume ever put together on the subject of Byzantine gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program and Abstracts
    2013 Byzantine Studies Conference Yale University, New Haven, CT Meetings at the Byzantine Studies Conference will take place in the following rooms: Linsly-Chittenden Hall, 63 High Street Sudler Hall, 100 Wall Street (inside Harkness Hall) Sheffield-Sterling-Strathcona, 1 Prospect Street (corner of Grove and Prospect Streets) President's Room, 2nd floor of the Memorial Hall, (diagonally opposite Sheffield-Sterling- Strathcona) College and Grove Streets Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 121 Wall Street Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:30 - 6:30 P.M. Registration, Reception, and Manuscript Display Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library 4:30pm – 5:30 P.M. Exhibition of Byzantine manuscripts at the Beinecke – hosted by Roland Betancourt, Magdalene Breidenthal, Robert Nelson and Nicole Paxton Sullo (Note: this is the only time that these manuscripts, including new acquisitions, will be on display) Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Room 38/39 5:00pm – 6:30 P.M. Welcome Reception Mezzanine level, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library Friday, November 1, 2013 8:00 A.M. – Welcome Location: Sudler Hall Martin Jean, Director, Institute of Sacred Music, Yale University Robert Nelson, Yale University 8:30 – 10:45 A.M. – Session 1 1A Between Worlds: Caucasia at the End of Antiquity Chair: Walter Kaegi, University of Chicago Location: Linsly-Chittenden Hall 102 “Topographies of Power and Memory in Late Antique Armenia” Matthew Canepa, University of Minnesota “The Syrian Fathers in Georgia: Ethnicities and Christologies” Paul Crego, Library of Congress “The Excavations and Reconstruction Theories of Zuart’noc’ (c. 641-c.661)” Christina Maranci, Tufts University 1 “’You Shall Again Receive From Us Your Outstanding Positions of Honor:’ The Caucasian Aristocracies in Sasanian Armies, 220-651 CE” Scott McDonough, William Paterson University “The Parthian Contribution to Caucasia’s Christianization” Stephen H.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Empire (Ca 600-1200): I.1
    INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH ΙΝΣΤΙΤΟΥΤΟ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ SECTION OF BYZANTINE RESEARCH ΤΟΜΕΑΣ ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ NATIONAL HELLENIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION ΕΘΝΙΚΟ IΔΡΥΜΑ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ Τομοσ 31 VOLUME EFI RAGIA THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION NIKOLAOS L. KOSTOURAKIS OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE (CA 600-1200): I.1. THE APOTHEKAI OF ASIA MINOR (7TH-8TH C.) LITERARY REPRESENTATIONS OF DESCENT AND SOCIAL MOBILITY: THE CASE OF THE LAKAPENOI ΑΘΗΝΑ • 20092021 • ATHENS NIKOLAOS L. KOSTOURAKIS LITERARY REPRESENTATIONS OF DESCENT AND SOCIAL MOBILITY: THE CASE OF THE LAKAPENOI* The tenth century witnessed drastic developments in Byzantine history writing, as narrative historiography was gradually overshadowed by the new genre of historical biography. Its main novelty lies in ordering the material not in a linear timeline but around a certain individual, the history’s protagonist, whose deeds are exalted1. Though far from certain, historical biography might have originated in the court milieu as Genesios and Theophanes Continuatus seem to have taken the earliest steps towards that direction2. This did not prevent the Asia Minor military aristocracy, which emerged as a dominant political group in the tenth century, from taking advantage of the same tool in order to consolidate and expand its influence3. * This article originates from a chapter of my M.A. thesis, Οικογενειακές στρατηγικές και πολιτική στο Βυζάντιο τον Θ´ αιώνα (802–913), written at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens under the supervision of Associate Professor Katerina Nikolaou. Ι would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the journal for their useful comments and suggestions. 1. A. MARKOPOULOS, Byzantine history writing at the end of the first millennium, in: Byzantium in the year 1000 [The Medieval Mediterranean, 45], ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo the Deacon
    The History of Leo the Deacon Byzantine Military Expansion in the Tenth Century Introduction, translation, and annotations by Alice-Mary Talbot and Denis F. Sullivan Dumbarton Oaks Studies XLI THE HISTORY OF LEO THE DEACON THE HISTORY OF LEO THE DEACON Byzantine Military Expansion in the Tenth Century Introduction, translation, and annotations by Alice-Mary Talbot and Denis F. Sullivan with the assistance of George T. Dennis and Stamatina McGrath Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Washington, D.C. © 2005 Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University Washington, D.C. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Leo, the Deacon, b. ca. 950. [ History. English] The History of Leo the Deacon : Byzantine military expansion in the tenth century / introduction, translation, and annotations by Alice-Mary Talbot and Denis F. Sullivan ; with the assistance of George T. Dennis and Stamatina McGrath. p. cm. History translated into English from the original Greek; critical matter in English. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88402-306-0 1. Byzantine Empire—History, Military—527-1081. I. Talbot, Alice-Mary Maffry. II. Sullivan, Denis. III.Title. DF543.L46 2005 2005003088 Contents Preface and Acknowledgments vii Abbreviations χ Introduction A The Byzantine Empire in the Tenth Century: Outline of Military and Political Events 1 Β The Byzantine Military in the Tenth Century 4 C Biography of Leo the Deacon 9 D Leo as a "Historian" 11 Ε Manuscript Tradition of the History 50
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Zionism? *
    The End of Zionism? * By Brother Pierre LENHARDT, nds In “Cahiers Ratisbonne”, I wrote1 an article entitled: “La Terre d’Israël, Jérusalem, le Temple, leur valeur pour les Juifs et pour les Chrétiens” (The Land of Israel, Jerusalem, the Temple, their value for Jews and for Christians).2 It seemed to me that these values were being ignored too much by Christians in general and by Arab Christians in particular. I was struck by this when I heard a lecture by N.S. Ateek given at the “Ecumenical Theological Research Fraternity in Israel” and then when I read his book, Justice and only Justice. A Palestinian Theology of Liberation, New York, 1989.3 My perspective was explicitly religious, in order first of all to foster listening to Jewish Tradition, and then so as to situate myself as a Christian within the resonance of that tradition. My article, which has been translated and published in Dutch, Spanish and Italian, received good echoes. It also brought me some at times vehement criticism from certain Christians who are opposed to every territorial, political, or national dimension of a Jewish presence in the Holy Land. The same article was translated into English and sent to Father Michael Perko, a Jesuit in the USA, who is a professor at Loyola University in Chicago. It was well received by him, but he did not give any opinion on the “pro-Zionist” stance taken by me (“the pro-Zionist stance taken by Pierre Lenhardt in his elegant essay”).4 In reality, my article was not about Zionism and it did not give a justification for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Usurpation in Byzantium: Some Aspects of Communication, Legitimacy, and Moral Authority
    ‘THE GLORY OF RULING MAKES ALL THINGS PERMISSIBLE’: POWER AND USURPATION IN BYZANTIUM: SOME ASPECTS OF COMMUNICATION, LEGITIMACY, AND MORAL AUTHORITY By ALISTAIR JAMES DAVIDSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman, and Modern Greek Studies Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT In Byzantium, usurpation was made possible by the conflict between hereditary-dynastic and meritocratic-republican theories of rulership. Legitimacy was founded upon subjective notions of idealized moral-behavioural norms drawn from the imperial virtues and Christian ideology. Authority could be challenged when it was perceived to deviate from these norms. Investitures transformed a usurper from a private individual to an emperor on the basis of ratification by popular consent. The historic ritual of reluctance allowed emperors to present themselves as ‘moral ideals’ at the moment of proclamation, ridding them of blame for a usurpation. Guilt and sin were inevitable byproducts of usurpation, but imperial repentance facilitated an expiation and legitimized imperial authority in relation to moral ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Jewish Sources for a Christian
    The Importance of Jewish Sources for a Christian Pierre Lenhardt Introductory Remarks1 The Jewish sources with which I have been working now for many years are of vital importance for me as a Christian. Of course, I would like all Christians to recognize their importance and that more and more Christians become involved in the study of Jewish sources. Since I cannot claim any doctoral fame, my comments will be based only on the experience I have acquired through my contact with Israel and its religious Tradition. My personal position is that of a Catholic. That should not be understood in opposition to other Christian denominations. Rather, I want to be as clear as possible about my own identity in order to speak of the importance of Jewish studies for me. I want to say that the Jewish sources which I as a Catholic take into consideration are those which serve as a reference for “all Jews”, to borrow a phrase from Mark’s Gospel (7:13) which seems relevant. In fact, I believe that when the Catholic Church speaks of “Jews” and of “Judaism” in remembering the patrimony common to Judaism and to Christianity, in speaking of Jewish and of Christian identity, in affirming that ‘the First Covenant was never revoked’, it means and can only mean, first of all, those Jews and that Judaism which are in continuity with the Pharisees.2 Certainly, in signing a fundamental agreement with the State of Israel in December 1993, the Catholic Church acknowledges that this State represents the Jewish people and consequently other Jews besides those who claim to be in continuity with the Pharisees.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering for the Future
    REMEMBERINGFORTHEFUTURE: THEHOLOCAUSTINANAGEOFGENOCIDE REMEMBERING FORTHE FUTURE The Holocaust in an Age of Genocide Editors in Chief John K. Roth and Elisabeth Maxwell Editor Margot Levy Managing Editor Wendy Whitworth Volume 1 History # Remembering for the Future, 2001 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P OLP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2001 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St. Martin's Press LLC Scholarly and Reference Division and Palgrave Publishers Ltd (formerly Macmillan Press Ltd). ISBN 978-1-333-80486-5 ISBN 978-1-349-66019-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Dream Narratives: Texts and Translations
    Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, IV 18, 116 This dream comes from chapter 18 of the fourth book of the Stromata, where Clement is occupied with the topic of love and (repression of) desire. The narrative is introduced to stress the subtle dangers of sight. Clement is in fact much stricter than the nameless Gnostic exegete who told him the witty story. He stands by the point that looking with desire is the same as transgressing the law. A desiring gaze brings about “daydreaming”. Sin happens before reaching the point of “conceiving” an image of intercourse in the mind – the Greek verb συλλαμβάνω being the same for both mental and bodily conceptions. The combination of gaze and longing is an unlawful deed per se. Actually, Clement seems to imply that the ὕπαρ thus “conceived” is worse than a “regular” ὄναρ, as the man, when awake, should be in control of his assent. This dream narrative is moreover significant because it can be easily read against the background of both Rabbinic anthropology and stoic philosophy. It is a telling example of Clement’s multilayered cultural heritage. In particular, the narrative points to both the Rabbinic notion of yetzer (implicitly) and to the stoic construct of φαντασία (explicitly). In both instances a process of internalization of external images (and powers) is at stake. Ἐνταῦθα γενόμενος ἀνεμνήσθην τινὸς φάσκοντος ἑαυτὸν γνωστικόν. ἐξηγούμενος γὰρ τὸ «ἐγὼ δὲ λέγω, ὁ ἐμβλέψας τῇ γυναικὶ πρὸς ἐπιθυμίαν ἤδη μεμοίχευκεν» οὐ ψιλὴν τὴν ἐπιθυμίαν ἠξίου κρίνεσθαι, ἀλλὰ ἐὰν τῇ ἐπιθυμίᾳ τὸ κατ’ αὐτὴν ἔργον περαιτέρω τῆς ἐπιθυμίας χωροῦν ἐν αὐτῇ ἐκτελῆται· εἰ γὰρ ὄναρ τῇ φαντασίᾳ, συγκαταχρῆται ἤδη καὶ τῷ σώματι.
    [Show full text]