DOCSLIB.ORG

Wondul Range National Park Management Plan 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wondul Range National Park Management Plan 2011 Brigalow Belt South Bioregion Prepared by: Planning Services Unit Department of Environment and Resource Management © State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2011 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Resource Management. Enquiries should be addressed to Department of Environment and Resource Management, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Qld 4001. Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. This management plan has been prepared in accordance with the Nature Conservation Act 1992. This management plan does not intend to affect, diminish or extinguish native title or associated rights. Note that implementing some management strategies might need to be phased in according to resource availability. For information on protected area management plans, visit <www.derm.qld.gov.au>. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3224 8412. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (including large print and audiotape) on request for people with a vision impairment. Contact (07) 322 48412 or email <[email protected]>. Front cover photograph: Macrozamia machinii. Photo: DERM. Top right photograph: Shedded bark, Wondul Range National Park. Photo: DERM. Centre right photograph: katydid. Photo: DERM. Bottom right photograph: Cyclorana novaehollandiae. Photo: DERM. May 2011 ISSN 1037-4698 MP045 Vision statement Wondul Range National Park will be managed to conserve open woodland species typical of the Western Downs. Maintaining and protecting the natural values of the park and conserving its plant communities will be the key focus for management. The park protects several species of conservation significance, including the gum-topped ironbark Eucalyptus decorticans, which is at the southern limit of its range. Wondul Range National Park will also be managed to present visitors with nature-based experiences that have minimal impact on the environment and ensure the sustainable use of the park. Contents 1. Management intent .............................................................................................................................................1 2. Basis for management........................................................................................................................................1 3. Location and regional context...........................................................................................................................1 4. Protecting and presenting the park’s values ...................................................................................................2 4.1 Landscape .......................................................................................................................................................2 4.2 Native animals .................................................................................................................................................2 4.3 Indigenous culture ...........................................................................................................................................3 4.4 Shared-history culture......................................................................................................................................4 4.5 Tourism and visitor opportunities.....................................................................................................................4 4.6 Education and science.....................................................................................................................................4 4.7 Partnerships.....................................................................................................................................................4 5. Other key issues and responses.......................................................................................................................5 5.1 Fire management.............................................................................................................................................5 5.2 Pest management............................................................................................................................................5 5.3 Resource use...................................................................................................................................................5 6. References...........................................................................................................................................................7 7. Hyperlinks............................................................................................................................................................7 8. Appendixes..........................................................................................................................................................8 Appendix A – Maps ...................................................................................................................................................9 Appendix B – Definitions .........................................................................................................................................12 Appendix C – Species of conservation significance ...............................................................................................13 iii Wondul Range National Park Management Plan 1. Management intent Wondul Range National Park will be managed as a representative sample of the open woodland species typical of the Western Downs. The primary purpose of management for this park will be to: • protect and conserve its natural and cultural values • identify and conserve species of conservation significance through specific management strategies, where appropriate • maintain access for self-sufficient visitors in a completely natural setting • provide neighbours, local government, Traditional Owners and other interested parties opportunities to be involved in managing the park, where appropriate. 2. Basis for management The Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) is responsible for the day-to-day management of Wondul Range National Park. The park is primarily managed in accordance with the Nature Conservation Act 1992 and associated regulations to protect land, wildlife and cultural values. Indigenous people have affiliations with the park and involving Traditional Owner groups is an important part of management. Wondul Range National Park is included in an area subject to native title claim (Bigambul QC01/006). This plan does not affect this claim. Cultural heritage places in Queensland are legislatively managed under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 and the Queensland Heritage Act 1992. The Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage and The Burra Charter provide detailed guidelines for managing cultural heritage places. Endangered, near threatened and vulnerable species are listed under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006. The Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) has a responsibility under the Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 to control declared pest plants and animals in protected areas. The park supports migratory species listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (that is, those species listed under the Bonn Convention, the China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement, Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement and Republic of Korea–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement). 3. Location and regional context Wondul Range National Park, 19 km west of Millmerran in the Toowoomba Regional Council area of southern Queensland, conserves 3555 ha of open woodland species typical of the Western Downs. The park is in the Brigalow Belt South bioregion, province 32: the Inglewood Sandstones. The park’s western boundary adjoins Bulli State Forest, with a small section of its south-west boundary abutting Whetstone State Forest. There are several rural freehold blocks adjoining the park’s northern boundary and these separate the park from the nearby Wondul Creek State Forest to the north-east. The remainder of the park is surrounded by pastoral leasehold land. Western Creek State Forest is close to the park (refer to Appendix A – Maps). Adjoining land uses include cattle grazing, forestry and a number of smaller rural residential properties. Wondul Range National Park provides a natural setting with few roads and no facilities. It is most suited to self- sufficient visitors with interests in nature-based activities in natural, undeveloped settings. Most visitors are seeking a venue for a particular nature-based experience, such as bird watching or wildlife observation. 1 Wondul Range National Park Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition
    THREATENED WILDLIFE PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION Winners Announced The Australian Wildlife Society Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition is a national competition that awards and promotes endangered Australian wildlife through the medium of photography. The Australian Wildlife Society invited photographers to raise the plight of endangered wildlife in Australia. Our Society aims to encourage the production of photographs taken in Australia, by Australians, which reflects the diversity and uniqueness of endangered Australian wildlife. The annual judge’s prize of $1,000 was won by Native Animal Rescue of Western Australia (Mike Jones, Black Cockatoo Coordinator). The winning entry was a photo of a forest red-tailed black cockatoo named Makuru. The forest red-tailed black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksia naso) is listed as Vulnerable; only two of the five subspecies of black cockatoo are listed as Threatened on account of habitat destruction and competition for nesting hollows. The photograph was taken in Native Animal Rescue’s Black Cockatoo Facility (opened 2011 thanks to a generous grant from Lotterywest), which allows them to receive and care for injured or ill black cockatoos. Makuru (a Nyungar word meaning The First Rains or Fertility Season) was the first captive-born black cockatoo at the facility in July 2016. The photo depicts the young cockatoo emerging from its breeding hollow at two months and 15 days. Thank you to all the contributors to the Society’s inaugural Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition – please enter again next year. Australian Wildlife Vol 4 - Spring 2017 7 The annual people’s choice prize of $500 was won by Matt White Matt’s entry was a photo of a greater glider (Petauroides volans).
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Ecological Assessment
    Detailed Ecological Assessment St Aidan’s Anglican Girls School Ambiwerra Sports Complex MID 30 Thalia Court, Corinda Client St Aidan’s Anglican Girls School File Ref S520038ER001_v1.5 Date 8 March 2021 ii Quality Control St Aidan’s Anglican Girl’s School Prepared for C/- John Gaskell Planning Consultants S5 Consulting Pty Ltd (ACN 600 187 844) 22 Wolverhampton Street Prepared by Stafford, QLD, 4053 T 3356 0550 www.s5consulting.com.au Date 8 March 2021 Version Control Version Description Date Author Reviewer Approver 1.0 FINAL August 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.2 FINAL September 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.3 FINAL November 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.4 FINAL 17 November 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.5 FINAL 8 March 2021 RG (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) S5 Consulting Pty Ltd has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of S5 Consulting Pty Ltd. These materials or parts of them may not be reproduced in any form, by any method, for any purpose except with written permission from S5 Consulting Pty Ltd. Subject to these conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. S520038ER001_v1.5 Ambiwerra Sports Precinct Detailed Ecological Assessment iii Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Hill South Project Environmental Impact Statement Volume 5 – Appendices February 2014 Boundary Hill South Project P2
    BOUNDARY HILL SOUTH PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 5 – Appendices February 2014 BOUNDARY HILL SOUTH PROJECT P2 Terrestrial Fauna Assessment NOTE: At the time of preparation of this technical assessment, the Project site included a larger footprint of 1,069 hectares. In June 2013, a decision was made to reduce the size of the Project site by removing a portion of the Mining Lease Application (MLA) area. This portion of the site, otherwise known as the Timber Reserve area, has been removed from the Project MLA and will not be subject to mining activity as part of the Project. This amendment to the MLA boundary reduces the size of the Project site from 1,069 hectares to 630 hectares. As such, the terrestrial fauna assessment has been undertaken within a broader survey area and included the Timber Reserve area. Whilst the terrestrial fauna survey was undertaken over the broader study area to include the originally proposed MLA, the impact assessment contained in Chapter 12A Terrestrial Ecology considers the revised Project area of 630 hectares. Boundary Hill South Environmental Impact Statement Boundary Hill South Anglo Coal (Callide Management) Pty Ltd 01-Nov-2012 Doc No. 60238883 Terrestrial Fauna Technical Report AECOM Boundary Hill South Terrestrial Fauna Technical Report Terrestrial Fauna Technical Report Client: Anglo Coal (Callide Management) Pty Ltd ABN: 75 009 666 200 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd 21 Stokes Street, PO Box 5423, Townsville QLD 4810, Australia T +61 7 4729 5500 F +61 7 4729 5599 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 01-Nov-2012 Job No.: 60238883 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Inspection of Pony Hills East Quarry Extension, Fairview Gas Field
    REPORT ON INSPECTION OF PONY HILLS EAST QUARRY EXTENSION, FAIRVIEW GAS FIELD. Compiled by BOOBOOK for SANTOS BOOBOOK 113 Euthulla Road PO Box 924 Roma QLD 4455 Ph. (07) 46222646 Fax (07) 46221325 [email protected] ABN: 94 617 952 309 www.boobook.biz DOCUMENT CONTROL REV DATE DETAILS AUTHOR VERIFIER APPROVED 0 26/12/2011 DRAFT V.1 RA CE ME 1 26/12/2011 FINAL RA CE CE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a summary of the results of a field inspection undertaken by Boobook on 29 and 30 September 2011 at the proposed Pony Hills East quarry extension within the Fairview Gas Field. The site was inspected to determine the presence or absence of sensitive habitats and significant species, as well as to provide an overview of the terrestrial ecology of the site. Descriptions of habitat were made at six sites within the proposed extension area. Data from nine sites recorded during a previous survey (Boobook 2010) is incorporated within this report. The proposed quarry extension is mapped by DERM as non-remnant vegetation, however, the field survey demonstrated that the entire quarry extension is comprised of remnant vegetation dominated by White Cypress Pine woodland which equates to a least concern regional ecosystem type, this being RE 11.10.9. No endangered or of concern regional ecosystems scheduled under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 or threatened ecological communities listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 are present within the quarry extension. No species of fauna scheduled as endangered, vulnerable or near threatened (EVNT) under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 and/or the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 were detected during the field survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report
    REPORT Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Ecological Assessment Report Lot 52 SP199328 Australia Pacific LNG Document No. Q-4500-15-RP-1033 23 January 2013 Ecological Assessment Report Lot 52 SP199328 Approved Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Study Sign-off Client Manager A 10/12/2012 Issued for review Sophie Cowie Jason Richard B 11/01/2013 Issued for use Michael Jones Jason Richard 0 23/01/2013 Issued for use Michael Jones Jason Richard Item Page Section Comments * Use after Rev. 0 52SP199328_REV0_23012013 Q-4500-15-RP-1033 Page 1 Ecological Assessment Report Lot 52 SP199328 Disclaimer This Ecological Assessment Report (Report) has been prepared for Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited (Australia Pacific LNG) by AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Australia Pty Ltd (AMEC), based on assumptions as identified throughout the text and upon information and data supplied by others. The Report is to be read in the context of the methodology, procedures and techniques used, AMEC’s assumptions, and the circumstances and constraints under which the Report was written. The Report is to be read as a whole, and sections or parts thereof should therefore not be read or relied upon out of context. AMEC has, in preparing the Report, followed methodology and procedures, and exercised due care consistent with the intended level of accuracy, using its professional judgment and reasonable care. However, no warranty should be implied as to the accuracy of estimates or other values and all estimates and other values are only valid as at the date of the Report and will vary thereafter. Parts of the Report have been prepared or arranged by Australia Pacific LNG or third party contributors, as detailed in the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially Explicit Cost-Effective Actions for Biodiversity Threat Abatement
    Spatially explicit cost-effective actions for biodiversity threat abatement Nancy Anne Auerbach BA, MBSc A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Biodiversity decline is indisputable, and rates of future decline depend on whether threats to species persistence are abated. However, current resources for threatened species management are less than required to stop further decline. Management that abates many threats to many species is necessary, yet decisions about how to do this under resource constraints are inherently complex. My thesis incorporates systematic conservation planning and cost-effectiveness analysis in a decision-support framework for prioritising spatially-explicit management actions for many species across a region. By prioritising action where it is expected to provide the greatest benefit to the most species at least cost, my research advances the thinking on decision support, and contributes to the effort to reduce biodiversity decline. Using information on threats to species that was compiled by the Queensland, Australia government, my research develops a decision-support process for managing threats to threatened species in a bio-diverse regional-scale management area, the Burnett-Mary Natural Resource Management Region. In my thesis, predicted distributions for 65 threatened species are modelled on co-occurring presence-only species locations and ecologically-meaningful environmental data. Three threats are addressed: invasive red fox predation; too frequent and intense fire; and habitat degradation from overgrazing. Indirect threat maps are made by combining predicted distribution models of species vulnerable to specific threats and are used to identify locations where threat- abating actions are most likely to provide benefit to species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment Report
    environmental management ecological assessment report environmental management Ecological Assessment Report — EPBC Act Referral Flinders Residential Development Undullah Road, Undullah Pacifiq Communities Pty Ltd 8020 E 15November 2017 saunders havill group page iii environmental management ecological assessment report Document Control Title Ecological Assessment Report — EPBC Act Referral Address Undullah Road, Undullah Queensland 4285 Job Number 8020 E Client Pacifiq Communities Pty Ltd Document Issue Issue Date Prepared By Checked By Draft (Client review) 28 September 2017 JB MS Draft (Client review) 3 November 2017 JB AD Draft (Client review) 10 November 2017 JB AD Final 15 November 2017 JB AD Disclaimer This report has been prepared for Pacifiq Communities Pty Ltd . Saunders Havill Group cannot accept responsibility for any use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any third party. Reports and/or Plans by Others Reports and/or plans by others may be included within this Environmental Management report to support the document. saunders havill group page i environmental management ecological assessment report Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Key action details 5 1.2. Purpose of this report 6 2. Methodology and process 9 2.1. Desktop research 9 2.2. Field surveys 9 Targeted species surveys 10 3. Legislation, policy and planning review 13 3.1. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 13 3.2. Nature Conservation Act 1992 15 3.3. Vegetation Management Act 1999 16 3.4. Other relevant Queensland environmental legislation and policy 21 Planning Act 2016 assessment benchmarks (Koala habitat) 21 Regional Planning Interests Act 2014 21 Fisheries Act 1994 22 State Planning Policy 22 ShapingSEQ South East Queensland Regional Plan 23 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna
    AECOM Coopers Gap Wind farm 225 Flora and Fauna 12.0 Flora and Fauna 12.1 Introduction This chapter of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) provides the flora and fauna assessment for the Project. The Project is located in the Eastern Darling Downs province of the Brigalow Belt Bioregion (Bioregion), and between Bunya Mountains National Park and Diamondy State Forest (Figure 12.1, Volume 2) and is subject to a number of flora and fauna values. The chapter describes the known ecological values within and adjacent to the Project Site that have been retrieved from desktop resources and a series of on-site investigations. This information has been used through the design refinement process to select the Project Site, including avoidance of threatened ecological values where possible. The potential impacts to flora and fauna from the construction and operational works within the Project Site are discussed and, where relevant, mitigation measures are provided to suitably avoid, minimise and/or mitigate those potential impacts. 12.2 Scope of assessment The aim of this assessment is to identify the ecological values that may exist within the Study Area and Project Site. This assessment seeks to use this information to: • Identify and map areas that are environmentally sensitive to the proposed construction of operation of the Project • Describe the terrestrial flora and fauna values within the Study Area and Project Site • Provide input to the design refinement process, so that - impacts to: (i) remnant vegetation; (ii) high value regrowth vegetation; (iii) essential habitat; and (iv) riparian areas are minimised - turbines avoid (where possible) remnant vegetation, regrowth vegetation, and habitat identified as important for species of conservation significance, in particular to minimise the occurrence of bird and bat strikes - individual paddock trees are avoided, which could provide stepping stones for fauna moving through the Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix BB Significant Species Management Plan
    Appendix BB Significant Species Management Plan Significant Species Management Plan Rev 1 September 2011 Significant Species Management Plans QCLNG Gas Field Rev 1 September 2011 Prepared by Unidel QCLNG-BX00-ENV-PLN-000025 Uncontrolled when printed 1 of 312 Significant Species Management Plan Rev 1 September 2011 Table of Contents DEFINITIONS 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations 10 Referenced / Associated Documents 10 1. INTRODUCTION 12 1.1 Purpose of the SSMP 13 1.2 Scope of SSMP 13 1.3 Legislative Requirements 16 1.3.1 Commonwealth ................................................................................................................................. 16 1.3.2 State .................................................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 SSMP Authors 16 1.5 Review of SSMP 16 1.6 Roles and Responsibilities 17 1.7 Reporting 17 1.8 Distribution and Intended Audience 18 2. BACKGROUND 18 3. SSMP FRAMEWORK 19 3.1 Structure of SSMP 19 3.1.1 Identification of TECs and Species ................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Standard Management Procedures .................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Individual Significant Species Management Plans ........................................................................... 19 3.2 Gas Field Project Staging 20 3.2.1 Development ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SMALL BUSINESS TASK FORCE on Regulatory Relief
    Small Business Regulatory Review Board Meeting Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10:00 a.m. No. 1 Capitol District Building 250 South Hotel Street, Honolulu, HI Conference Room 436 SMALL BUSINESS REGULATORY REVIEW BOARD Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) Tel 808 586-2594 No. 1 Capitol District Bldg., 250 South Hotel St. 5th Fl., Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2359, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Email: [email protected] Website: dbedt.hawaii.gov/sbrrb AGENDA Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10:00 a.m. David Y. Ige Governor No. 1 Capitol District Building 250 South Hotel Street - Conference Room 436 Luis P. Salaveria DBEDT Director I. Call to Order Members II. Approval of July 18, 2018 Meeting Minutes Anthony Borge Chairperson III. New Business Oahu Robert Cundiff A. Discussion and Action on Proposed New Rules and Regulations for Kauai Vice Chairperson County Code Section 18-5.3, Revocable Permits to Vend within County Oahu Right-of-Ways, promulgated by Department of Parks and Recreation / Garth Yamanaka nd County of Kauai – Discussion Leader – Will Lydgate 2 Vice Chairperson Hawaii IV. Old Business Harris Nakamoto Oahu A. Discussion and Action on the Small Business Statement After Public Hearing Nancy Atmospera-Walch and Proposed Amendments to Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) of Oahu Chapter 162, Food Safety Certification Costs Grant Program, Reg Baker promulgated by Department of Agriculture (DOA) – Discussion Leader – Oahu Robert Cundiff / Will Lydgate Mary Albitz Maui B. Discussion and Action on the Small Business Statement After Public Hearing William Lydgate and Proposed Amendments of HAR Title 4 Chapter 71, Plant and Non- Kauai Domestic Animal Quarantine, Non-Domestic Animal Import Rules, Director, DBEDT promulgated by DOA – Discussion Leader – Robert Cundiff / Will Lydgate Voting Ex Officio V.
    [Show full text]