IS the ACTS of the APOSTLES HISTORICALLY RELIABLE? Part 2 of 2 by Brian Janeway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IS the ACTS of the APOSTLES HISTORICALLY RELIABLE? Part 2 of 2 by Brian Janeway IS THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES HISTORICALLY RELIABLE? Part 2 of 2 by Brian Janeway Part one of this article dealt primarily with the history of the criti- cism of the Book of Acts. In it I traced the birth of radical skepticism developed out of Enlightenment philosophy and brought to maturity by the likes of Ferdin and Baur among others. However, a "weighty counter-blow" was struck by new archaeological discoveries, espe- cially by Sir William Ramsay which affirmed the historicity of Acts. Next the speeches in Acts and the ancient practice of historiography were examined. Luke was found to be a faithful recorder of the essence of what was actually said in the best tradition of historians like Thucy- dides and Lucian. The second and final half of this article will analyze three more aspects of Luke's work: the "we" passages, archaeological and histori- cal data, and alleged difficulties in the text. These will be consummated in a verdict on whether the Book of Acts is indeed wor- thy of our trust. "We" Passages Style Criticism The so-called "we" passages in Acts present a unique and interest- ing opportunity to probe Luke's reliability. Analyses of these accounts are often bound up with questions of authorial identity. Whether the author actually accompanied Paul on these voyages or not, Cadbury called an "insoluble riddle."1 Upon closer examination, however, the "riddle" does not appear insoluble. The "we" passages all appear in the last chapters of Acts. The ac- counts are linked with "theys," giving the appearance that the author moved in and out of the story as a participant. The passages being considered are: 1 Cadbury, Making, 357. 48 CTS Journal, vol. 5, #2 (April-June 1999) 16:10-17 Journey from Troas to Philippi 20:5-16 Journey from Philippi to Miletus 21:1-18 Journey from Miletus to Jerusalem 27:1-28:16 Journey from Caesarea to Rome Except for short overland segments, the majority of the passages concern sea voyages. The immediately obvious and simplest explana- tion for these accounts is that the writer was a participant whenever he uses the term "we."2 However, nothing is taken prima facie in the field of biblical criticism. There are three different views on these passages. The first holds that the author was an eyewitness; the second that the author was not present but used accounts from sources that were; and, the third is that the author used them as a literary device to portray verisimilitude. For the purposes of establishing historical trustworthiness, the distinction between the first two is irrelevant. Luke could well have used accurate accounts borrowed from others. Therefore, we are left with two possi- bilities. Either the accounts represent eyewitness information, or they were a product of literary convention. Again, the work of Dibelius is credited with bringing a new per- spective to the field. His hypothesis has been widely accepted by later scholars. He proposed that the author had access to a travel diary or "itinerary" that he used as a framework. Into the framework he in- serted "edifying" tales at appropriate junctures. He supports this by noting that places are mentioned at which nothing really occurs; for example, Attalia (14:2-5), Samothrace and Neapolis (16:11), and Am- phipolis (17:1).3 However, a stronger counter argument could be made that the numerous incidental details are best explained by eyewitness participation. What better reason for their inclusion? 2 Ibid., 359. Cadbury, by applying the preface of Luke's gospel to Acts (as many critics do) shows that Luke quite likely was not an eyewitness to all "the things fulfilled among us" but drew on sources for the earlier chapters while clearly implying involvement in the later ones. 3 Conzelmann, Acts, xxxix. Acts of the Apostles 49 Paul’s Shipwreck Voyage The case of Paul's shipwreck journey (Acts 27-28) is an excellent one for a closer analysis. Ludemann in his chapter-by-chapter redac- tion study asserts that the use of technical nautical expressions should not mislead one into believing the account to be real. Deriving from Dibelius the itinerary theory, he notes that Paul is only mentioned in four passages during the sequence from Myra to Malta. Hence, Paul could easily be "detached from the action without difficulty."4 Ludemann continues in his effort to separate redactions from tradi- tions from historical material. Not surprisingly, after filtering out the former two, he is left with precious little that one can consider histori- cal. The shipwreck he attributes to parallels in ancient literature that mingle the first person with the third person such as Odysseus. How- ever, the result is a "literary entity" in which Luke added Paul to the passages noted. In an astoundingly curt dismissal, he concludes "there should no longer be any dispute here."5 Unfortunately, one cannot so easily dispense with the accounts. Gilchrist lists several reasons for supporting his contention that Luke drew on personal recollections. • The realism of the passages and their extensive, even unneces- sary detail explainable only by personal memory. • The "unobtrusive use of `we' and its introduction without ex- planation." • The author's failure to use "we" throughout the narrative when he could have made extensive use of it. • The apparent knowledge of the emergency measures taken at sea.6 In addition, he makes an astute observation concerning the overall natural construction of the passages. He counts nearly one hundred uses of "we" in which the author has no problem alternating with 4 Ludemann, Early, 257. 5 Ibid., 259. 6 J. M. Gilchrist, "The Historicity of Paul's Shipwreck," Journal for the Study of the New Testament 61 (1996):34. 50 CTS Journal, vol. 5, #2 (April-June 1999) "theys" and other third person pronouns. The impression is of a seam- less series of transitions that would require a "particularly well- disciplined imagination" to execute. The most satisfactory conclusion is that he simply remembered his own experiences.7 In the 1840’s, a layman named James Smith did a remarkable study on Paul's last voyage. He was an amateur yachtsman of thirty years experience who traveled throughout the eastern Mediterranean where Paul's voyage took place. His findings are still referenced today. In it he wrote of Luke: His style . though accurate, is unprofessional. No sailor would have written in a style so little like that of a sailor; no man not a sailor could have written a nar- rative of a sea voyage so consistent in all its parts, unless from actual observation. This peculiarity of style is to me, in itself, a demonstration that the narra- tive of the voyage is an account of real events, written by an eyewitness. The geographical details must have been taken from actual observation, for the geographi- cal knowledge of the age was not such as to enable a writer to be so minutely accurate in any other way.8 What were some of these peculiarities and geographical details? Hemer compiled an extensive, but not exhaustive, list of these features. Acts 27:6 Myra was a principal port for the Alexandrian corn ships and the exact place that the centurion would have found a Roman ship.9 Acts 27:7 The passage around the south of Crete would appear to be an unlikely one but due to the prevailing northwest wind it was forced upon the ship. In fact, this was the normal direction for ves- sels to take.10 7 Ibid., 35. 8 James Smith, The Voyage and Shipwreck of St. Paul (London, 1866), xxx. 9 Hemer, Setting, 134. 10 Ibid. Acts of the Apostles 51 Acts 27:8 The obscure locations of ‘Fair Havens’ and Lasea the author accurately attests and they are unlikely to be known by someone not on the voyage.11 Acts 27:16 The island of Cauda is precisely placed and correctly named. It is also realistically where a ship would be driven helpless by a northeast wind from beyond the refuge of Cape Matala.12 Acts 27:27 Calculations made by Smith to estimate the time for a ship to drift from Cauda to Malta were confirmed by local sailors at close to 14 days.13 Acts 27:27 The expanse of sea named Adria, now known as the Adri- atic, Josephus accurately corroborates.14 Acts 28:7 The title "leading man of the island" in Malta has been con- firmed by inscriptions.15 Acts 28:15 Two waypoints on the Appian Way; Market of Appius and Three Inns, the author accurately locates.16 The precision and detail of these accounts is formidable and argue strongly against an artificial creation. Many scholars have taken note of the richness of this account.17 Contrasted to the earlier parts of Acts, the "we" passages are superior in detail. It would appear reasonable that where Luke was a participant, the graphic descriptions would re- flect that fact and where he used sources, either oral or written, the same texture would be absent. On the other hand, it is generally accepted that the "we" passages do not differ from the sections in which they are embedded in either 11 Ibid., 136. 12 Ibid., 142, 331. 13 Smith, Voyage, 122-26. 14 Hemer, Setting, 146f. 15 Ibid., 153. 16 Ibid., 156. 17 For example, Hanson, Acts, 22, Gilchrist, Historicity, 37, Dibelius, Studies, 78, Alfred Wikenhauser, New Testament Introduction (New York: Herder and Herder, 1958), 328. 52 CTS Journal, vol. 5, #2 (April-June 1999) style or vocabulary or subject matter. This consistency of style demon- strates that the author was skillful in his incorporation of sources and eyewitness accounts into a uniform whole.
Recommended publications
  • The Tuesday Afternoon Bible Study - Acts 23
    The Tuesday Afternoon Bible Study - Acts 23 Acts 21-28 encompass several years, covering a long period of time in which Paul is always in captivity. Chapters 21-23 tell the first episode in this period, where Paul’s life is threatened three times. Paul has returned to Jerusalem, where so long ago (back in ch 8) he launched his persecution again Christians. Paul’s presence in the temple causes an angry mob to seize him, bringing Roman soldiers to keep the peace, and thus saving him. When the soldiers learn that Paul is a Roman citizen, this allows him a favored status. Allowed to speak to the Jews, in ch 22 Paul offers his defense. After his speech, the Roman tribune in charge wants to understand more about these charges leveled against Paul by the Jews. He orders Paul to speak before Jerusalem’s high-ranking Jewish leaders (sometimes referred to by the Greek word for council, Sanhedrin.) Ch 23 tells of this next encounter. (Hint: it won’t end well.) Let’s read ch 23 in three sections, answering questions after reading each section. Acts 23: 1-11 Read all of Paul’s speech before this gathered body of Jewish leaders. 1. Speaking truth to power is dangerous and can result in injury. Paul starts with a statement about his long-standing faithfulness to the God of Israel. This results in an order by the high priest, Ananias, for Paul to be struck on the mouth. This is the third person named Ananias we encounter in Acts - all 3 are different persons, and the first time we encounter this one.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Saccio
    Great Figures of the New Testament Parts I & II Amy-Jill Levine, Ph.D. PUBLISHED BY: THE TEACHING COMPANY 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax—703-378-3819 www.teach12.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 2002 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company. Amy-Jill Levine, Ph.D. E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Professor of New Testament Studies Vanderbilt University Divinity School/ Vanderbilt University Graduate Department of Religion Amy-Jill Levine earned her B.A. with high honors in English and Religion at Smith College, where she graduated magna cum laude and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. Her M.A. and Ph.D. in Religion are from Duke University, where she was a Gurney Harris Kearns Fellow and W. D. Davies Instructor in Biblical Studies. Before moving to Vanderbilt, she was Sara Lawrence Lightfoot Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Religion at Swarthmore College. Professor Levine’s numerous publications address Second-Temple Judaism, Christian origins, Jewish-Christian relations, and biblical women. She is currently editing the twelve-volume Feminist Companions to the New Testament and Early Christian Literature for Continuum, completing a manuscript on Hellenistic Jewish narratives for Harvard University Press, and preparing a commentary on the Book of Esther for Walter de Gruyter (Berlin).
    [Show full text]
  • A:Cts of the Apostles (Revised Version)
    THE SCHOOL AND COLLEGE EDITION. A:CTS OF THE APOSTLES (REVISED VERSION) (CHAPTERS I.-XVI.) WITH BY THK REV. F. MARSHALL, M.A., (Lau Ezhibition,r of St, John's College, Camb,idge)• Recto, of Mileham, formerly Principal of the Training College, Ca11narthffl. and la1ely Head- Master of Almondbury Grammar School, First Edition 1920. Ten Impressions to 1932. Jonb.on: GEORGE GILL & SONS, Ln., MINERVA HOUSE, PATERNOSTER SQUARE, E.C.4. MAP TO ILLUSTRATE THE ACTS OPTBE APOSTLES . <t. ~ -li .i- C-4 l y .A. lO 15 20 PREFACE. 'i ms ~amon of the first Sixteen Chapters of the Acts of the Apostles is intended for the use of Students preparing for the Local Examina­ tions of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge and similar examinations. The Syndicates of the Oxford and Cambridge Universities often select these chapters as the subject for examination in a particular year. The Editor has accordingly drawn up the present Edition for the use of Candidates preparing for such Examinations. The Edition is an abridgement of the Editor's Acts of /ht Apostles, published by Messrs. Gill and Sons. The Introduction treats fully of the several subjects with which the Student should be acquainted. These are set forth in the Table of Contents. The Biographical and Geographical Notes, with the complete series of Maps, will be found to give the Student all necessary information, thns dispensing with the need for Atlas, Biblical Lictionary, and other aids. The text used in this volume is that of the Revised Version and is printed by permission of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, but all editorial responsibility rests with the editor of the present volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Empire in New Testament Times
    Roman Empire In New Testament Times Weepier and ordinate Staffard feminize while confounded Pierre ingulfs her polynomials luculently and insults onstage. Glairier Lindy chairman his strata infringe flourishingly. Rab dost her treatments nationwide, she expeditate it conspiratorially. Hbrews and despair, in believing that which all of the roman empire building projects increased throughout their empire in roman new testament times Nicola denzey lewis is in times as empire, or more flexible and empires that we read through this article is known. Roman comedy loved to fuck the extreme types of shrewish and conniving wives, libidinous women, and misbehaving domestic slaves, among many others. Son appointed to became the world? The empire creates shopify component ui. Ruth, would have been valuable to near relatives who wished to increase their land holdings while also continuing the family line of the deceased. The empire is unlikely that which paul hired a name three parts or. Christian Jewish community plays an important role in smart list of questions. Roman marriage, with its limited intrusion by official state and religious authorities, may also offer a useful perspective on the values and limits of external attempts at control. Thank frank for subscribing! But stomp was trying once recalled, and finding Augustus in failure last illness but still out, he spent her entire marriage with sweep in private. The event extreme expression from this city of early attachment by parents may need found hit the practices of infanticide and exposure. There was a king Herod but he never massacred children. Constantine likewise attempted a series of marital reforms, albeit with questionable effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Felix's Treatment of Paul
    Governor Felix’s Treatment of Paul We have just looked at the doctrine of resurrection, which the Apostle Paul taught, and preached, and left us so much information. Three times in sermons, or speeches that he gave, the Apostle Paul wasn’t allowed to say any more after mentioning the resurrection of the dead. In ACTS 17 during his sermon on Mars hill, we read this concerning Paul preaching about Jesus: 31 ..whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he bath raised him from the dead 32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter. 33 So Paul departed from among them. We see here that the majority in Athens didn’t want to here the message about resurrected Jesus Christ. Again before the Sanhedrin council in ACTS 23:6 Paul’s final words he was allowed to speak unto them were: ...Men and brethren, 1 am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. 7 And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees and the Sadducees: and the multitude was divided. 8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both. 9 And there arose a great cry: and the scribes that were of the Pharisee? part arose, and strove, saying, We find no evil in this man: but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speeches in Acts*
    Criswell Theological Review 5.1 (1990) 31-41. Copyright © 1990 by The Criswell College. Cited with permission. THE SPEECHES IN ACTS* SIMON J. KISTEMAKER Reformed Theological Seminary Jackson, MS 39209 About half of the Book of Acts consists of speeches, discourses, and letters. Counting both the short and the long addresses, we number at least 26 speeches that are made by either apostles and Christian leaders or by non-Christians (Jews and Gentiles). Classifying these speeches, we have eight addresses delivered by Peter,1 a lengthy sermon of Stephen before the Sanhedrin (7:2-53), a brief explanation by Cornelius (10:30-33), a short address by James at the Jerusalem Council (15:13- 21), the advice to Paul by James and the elders in Jerusalem (21:20-25), and nine sermons and speeches by Paul.2 The rest of the discourses were given by Gamaliel the Pharisee (5:35-39), Demetrius the silver- smith (19:25-27), the city clerk in Ephesus (19:35-40), Tertullus the lawyer (24:2-8), and Festus the governor (25:24-27).3 In addition, Luke relays the text of two letters: one from the Jerusalem Council to the Gentile churches (15:23-29), and the other written by Claudius Lysias addressed to Governor Felix (23:27-30). I. Sources The speeches in Acts make the book interesting, because when people talk we learn something about their personalities. Luke gives * A few paragraphs in this article have been taken from my commentary An Exposition of Acts (New Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids: Baker, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • <Ttnurnrbiu Mqtnlngirul ~Ut41!J
    <tTnurnrbiu mqtnlngirul ~ut41!J Continuing LEHRE UND -WEHRE MAGAZIN FUER EV.-LuTH. HOMILETIK THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY-THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY Vol. XVII July, 1946 No.7 CONTENTS Page Dr. Walther's Foreword for Volume XIV of "Lelu:e und Webre," 1868 Tr. by Alex Wm. C. Guebert _____________________ 481 The Author of Hebrews _ . A Fresh Approach E. L. Lueker _____ 499 Outlines on the Standard Epistle Lessons ___. _____________ 514 Miscellanea _________ . _____________________ .. ___ . ____________ 524 Theological Observer _____________ . _____________________ 532 Book Review ______. _____________ . ___ .________________ 550 Ein Predlger muss nicht allein wei­ Es ist kein Ding, das die Leute den, also dass er die Schafe unter­ mehr bei der Kirche behaelt denn weise, wic sie rechte Christen sollen die gute Predigt. - ApoLogie, Art. 24 sein, sondern auch daneben den Woel­ fen wehren, dass sie die Schafe nicht angreifen und mit falscher Lehre ver­ If the trumpet give an uncertain fuehren und Irrtum einfuehren. sound, who shall prepare himself to Luther the battle? -1 Cor. 14:8 Published by the Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States CONCORDIA PUBLISmNG HOUSE, St. Louis 18, Mo. PRINTED IN 'fl. S. A. _I Miscellanea Some Notes for a Lecture on Judaism and Early Christianity in the Roman State, with Special Reference to the Book of Acts In the two-volume work of Luke-Acts the author tells a story which moves almost entirely among the people of the Jews within and outside of Palestine, a nation which at that time was a part of the world empire of Rome. It is natural that the Christian movement came into close contact, sometimes into violent conflict, with the Jewish environment from which it grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts – Paul's Three Captivities – 21:17 – 28:31
    Acts – Paul’s Three Captivities – 21:17 – 28:31 Pastor Tom Gang » Sunday, January 3, 2021 UNWAVERING, WILLING AND WISE – ACTS 21:17 – 23:11 The In our last study of Acts we saw the conclusion of Paul’s third official missionary journey. As we examined this last text (Acts 21:1-17) we learned of the four warnings God gave the apostle through the Holy Ghost. He was specifically told not to go up to Jerusalem, for if he did, the result would be afflictions and incarceration. But, because of his heartfelt ____________________ for his Jewish brethren, he ignored God’s warnings and pressed on in his own endeavor to the city. Today we will see the historic narrative describe the course of events as they unfolded for Paul in Jerusalem and witness the fulfillment of his foretold turmoil. Even though this message is more of a commentary on the events, we will do well to pay close attention to every detail as God’s Spirit seeks to reveal issues surrounding our own _______________ endeavors for Christ. 1. Some of the main characters in the text - Paul – The apostle to the ______________. Paul has just completed a third missionary journey to of the uttermost parts of the known world. He has reached thousands of people for Christ and established countless churches. He is a Greek and Hebrew speaking Roman Jewish Pharisee. the - The Jewish crowds – They consist of both lost and saved people. Some are gathered from all parts of the known world in Jerusalem to observe various Jewish rites and holidays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Empire: the Defender of Early First Century Christianity
    Running head: THE ROMAN EMPIRE 1 The Roman Empire: the Defender of Early First Century Christianity John Toone A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2011 THE ROMAN EMPIRE 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ David A. Croteau, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Michael J. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Willie E. Honeycutt, D.Min. Committee Member ______________________________ James H. Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date THE ROMAN EMPIRE 3 Abstract All of the events, authors, and purposes of the books in the New Testament occurred under the reign of the Roman Empire (27 B.C.—A.D. 476). Therefore, an understanding of the Roman Empire is necessary for comprehending the historical context of the New Testament. In order to fully understand the impact of the Roman Empire on the New Testament, particularly before the destruction of the Jewish Temple in A.D. 70, Rome’s effect on religion (and the religious laws that governed its practice) must be examined. Contrary to expectations, the Roman Empire emerges from this examination as the protector (not persecutor) of early Christianity. Scripture from this time period reveals a peaceful relationship between the new faith and Roman authorities. THE ROMAN EMPIRE 4 The Roman Empire: The Defender of Early First Century Christianity Any attempt to describe the life of first century Christians before A.D. 70 is ultimately tenuous without understanding the cultural background of the society in which they lived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church in Rome in the First Century
    The Church in Rome in the First Century Author(s): Edmundson, George (1849-1930) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: In 1913, George Edmundson gave the University of Oxford©s Bampton Lectures, an annual (now biennial) lecture series that concentrates on Christian theological topics. This book contains the collection of Edmundson©s lectures, all of which concern Christianity©s first two hundred years. The majority of the book©s content addresses the New Testament directly, while a couple of the later lectures concern later early church figures such as Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertul- lian. During his time, Edmundson©s work was largely ignored, as he was a clergyman rather than a New Testament scholar. Not only this, but his conclusions differed vastly from the scholarly consensus of his contemporaries. Today, readers can approach Edmundson©s work as one piece of the ongoing dialogue in literary/historical criticism of the Bible. Kathleen O©Bannon CCEL Staff Subjects: Christianity History By period Early and medieval i Contents Title Page 1 Extract from the Last Will and Testament of the Late Rev. John Bampton 3 Synopsis of Contents 5 Lecture I 10 Lecture II 30 Lecture III 50 Lecture IV 71 Lecture V 90 Lecture VI 112 Lecture VII 136 Lecture VIII 154 Appendices 177 Note A. Chronological Table of Events Mentioned in the Lectures 178 Note B. Aquila and Prisca or Priscilla 181 Note C. The Pudens Legend 183 Note D. 188 Note E. The Tombs of the Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul 194 Note F.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT “As Paul Discoursed on Righteousness, Self-Control and the Judgment to Come, Felix Was Afraid
    JUDGMENT “As Paul discoursed on righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come, Felix was afraid . .” (Acts 24:25) There is no doubt about it, the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Ps. 111:10). The thought of making God mad makes rational people repent. Students study harder when they know a test is coming and sinners think twice about their conduct if they believe they will face God in Judgment after they die. Thus, the Day Judgment is an integral part of Biblical preaching. John the Baptist warned that some day God was going to gather the wheat and burn the chaff (Matt. 3:12). Jesus said that the men of Nineveh would rise up in the Judgment and condemn those who refused to repent (Matt. 12:41). Paul promised the Philosophers on Mars Hill that God had set a day in which He will judge the world (Acts 17:31). The writer of Hebrews assured his readers that it is appointed unto men once to die and after that the Judgment (Heb. 9:27). Those who preach the truth must warn the world about Judgment. One of the reasons why God sent His Holy Spirit was to convict the world of sin, righteousness, and Judgment (Jn. 16:8). If the watchman fails to warn sinners, they will die in their iniquity, but their blood will be required at the watchman’s hand (Ez. 3:18). Jesus warned: “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 the CHURCH in the FIRST CENTURY Political
    CHAPTER 2 THE CHURCH IN THE FIRST CENTURY Political background 1. Julians a. Augustus (30 BC - AD 14). Established emperorship, with constitutional forms; ordered census when Jesus born (ca. 5 BC; Lk. 2:1) b. Tiberius (AD 14-37). (not Lake Tiberias) Adopted son of Augustus, given life emperorship by senate; very suspicious, especially after unsuccessful revolt in AD 31; appointed Pontius Pilate as procurator of Judea, AD 26-36; time of Jesus’ ministry and death (cf. Lk. 3:1; 15th year of Tiberius = ca. AD 27) c. Caligula (AD 37-41). Mentally unstable (appointed horse to high office); reckless spender, emptied treasury, used extortion to raise taxes; demanded deification while still living (before, emperors had been worshiped as gods only after they died); ordered a stature of himself erected in the Jerusalem temple (Jews conducted “passive resistance,” delays, etc.; statue never set up; Caligula assassinated by Praetorian Guard d. Claudius (AD 41-54). Able ruler, but greatly expanded the bureaucracy; hated foreign religions; drove Jews out of Rome (Acts 18:2; ca. AD 51) e. Nero (AD 54-68). Son of Claudius, by fourth wife Agrippina; first five years peaceful (epistle to Romans written during this time); became raving maniac; murdered most of his family, including his mother; kicked his wife to death; murdered his teacher Seneca; wasted the treasury; very “dramatic” character; wanted new Rome (“Neropolis”); in July 64, two-thirds of Rome was burned; Nero the popular suspect; in turn he accused the Christians; many put to horrible deaths in Rome; * * * Nero started the official anti-Christian attitude of the Roman government; after him came intermittent persecutions until Constantine in the fourth century.
    [Show full text]