DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Numerical Relativity Erik SchneEr Perimeter InsTute for TheoreCal Physics CGWAS 2013, Caltech, 2013-07-26 What Is Numerical Relativity?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Numerical Relativity Erik Schne�Er Perimeter Ins�Tute for Theore�Cal Physics CGWAS 2013, Caltech, 2013-07-26 What Is Numerical Relativity? Introduction to Numerical Relativity Erik Schneer Perimeter Ins1tute for Theore1cal Physics CGWAS 2013, Caltech, 2013-07-26 What is Numerical Relativity? • Solving Einstein equaons numerically • Can handle arbitrarily complex systems • Sub-field of Computaonal Astrophysics • Also beginning to be relevant in cosmology • Einstein equaons relevant only for dense, compact objects: • Black holes • Neutron stars Overview • General Relavity: Geometry, Coordinates • Solving the Einstein equaons • Relavis1c Hydrodynamics • Analyzing Space1mes: horizons, gravitaonal waves Some relevant concepts GENERAL RELATIVITY Einstein Equations • Gab = 8π Tab • Gab: Einstein tensor, one measure of curvature • Tab: stress-energy tensor, describes mass/energy/momentum/ pressure/stress densi1es • Gab and Tab are symmetric: 10 independent components in 4D • Loose reading: (some part of) the space-1me curvature equals (“is generated by”) its maer content Spacetime Curvature • Difference between special and general relavity: in GR, space1me is curved • 2D example of a curved manifold: earth’s surface • Can’t use a straight coordinate system for a curved manifold! • E.g. Cartesian coordinate system doesn’t “fit” earth’s surface • In GR, one needs to use curvilinear, 1me-dependent coordinate systems • In fact, if one knows how to use arbitrary coordinate systems for a theory (e.g. hydrodynamics or electrodynamics), then working with this theory in GR becomes trivial Riemann, Ricci, Weyl • Curvature is measured by Riemann tensor Rabcd; has 20 independent components in 4D describing curvature completely • (unrelated to “Riemann problem” in hydrodynamics) • [blackboard sketch explaining how to measure curvature] • Can split Riemann tensor into two pieces: Ricci tensor Rab and Weyl tensor Cabcd • Ricci tensor directly (locally) determined by maer content (similar to div E and div B in electrodynamics); does not evolve • Weyl tensor evolves freely, determined by ini1al and boundary condi1ons (describing gravitaonal interac1ons) Metric • Metric gab is fundamental concept in GR • “Solving” a space1me usually means calculang its metric • Everything (curvature, gravitaonal waves, horizons, …) can be calculated from the metric • Conceptually (within theory of GR) similar to gravitaonal poten1al in Newtonian gravity, or poten1als Φ/Ai in electrodynamics • [blackboard sketch explaining meaning of metric] • Metric gab is symmetric, has 10 components in 4D • Metric defines geometry: lengths and angles Covariant Derivatives • Par1al derivaves ∂a are coordinate dependent a a • In other words, given e.g. a vector field Φ , the derivave ∂b Φ does not transform like a tensor under a coordinate transformaon • Note: This is unrelated to curvature – just a property when using non-uniform coordinate systems • Covariant derivaves Da are coordinate independent (“covariant”) a a a c • Db Φ = ∂b Φ + Γ bc Φ a • Christoffel symbol Γ bc contains first derivaves of the metric • A physically meaningful theory must be covariant (coordinate independent) The Einstein Equations as Wave-Type Equations • Can express the Riemann tensor, Ricci tensor etc. in terms of the metric: cd • Rab = -½ g ∂c ∂d gab + (many other terms involving first and second derivaves of the metric) • That is: • Einstein equaons are 10 wave-type equaons (coupled, non- linear) for the metric components • It is (in principle) well known how to solve such equaons (compare Maxwell equaons when wri+en in terms of poten1als) • However, the Einstein equaons have many terms and are thus technically complex 3+1 Decomposition • 4-vectors and 4-tensors are very elegant… • …but our everyday understanding, our astrophysical experience, and most numerical methods are based on space and 1me being separate… • …we thus split 4D space1me into 3D space and 1D 1me, so that the Einstein equaons look like a “conven1onal” theory. • Procedure: 1. Choose some 1me coordinate t for the space1me 2. Hypersurfaces t=const define a 3D space each (must be spacelike) 3. Split 4-vectors into scalar and 3-vector, 4-tensors into scalar, 3-vector, and 3-tensor Lapse and Shift i • The 4-metric gab is split into lapse α, ship β , and 3-metric γij (with simple geometric meanings) • Introduce extrinsic curvature Kij of t=const hypersurfaces (essen1ally 1me derivave of 3-metric) • [blackboard sketch explaining lapse and ship] • [blackboard sketch explaining extrinsic curvature] 2 i j • g00 = -α + γij β β j • g0i = γij β • gij = γij • ∂t γij = -2 α Kij + Di βj + Dj βi [Di is covariant derivave] Gauge Freedom • Certain parts of the 3-metric γij and extrinsic curvature Kij do not influence curvature • They can be chosen freely, and only influence the choice of coordinate system (e.g. div γij and trace Kij) • Called gauge degrees of freedom • Similarly, lapse α and ship βi are not determined by Einstein equaons • They select how the gauge degree of freedoms evolve in 1me • Can thus be chosen freely as well • 4 gauge degrees of freedom in total • Compare to choice of gauge freedom (div A) for vector poten1al A in electrodynamics Constraints • It turns out that some of the Einstein equaons do not involve 1me derivaves, i.e. they are not evolu1on equaons • These have to be sasfied at all 1mes • Compare to div E, div B in electrodynamics • Called Hamiltonian constraint (energy constraint) (scalar) and momentum constraint (3-vector) • Connec1ng curvature and maer content • Can be cast as ellip1c equaons (i.e. boundary value problems) • 4 constraints in total • Constraints need to be sasfied for ini1al condi1on • If so, they remain sasfied during 1me evolu1on • unless there are numerical errors ADM Formulation • A common formulaon that casts the 4D Einstein equaons into a 3+1 1me evolu1on system • ADM: named aer Arnowi+, Deser, Misner (1959) • Developed by James york • Note: several versions of ADM, beware e.g. sign conven1ons for Kij or Rij • ADM system: • 12 evolved variables: γij, Kij • 4 “gauge” variables: α, βi • their 1me derivaves A, Bi • 4 constraints H, Mi • 4 gauge condi1ons Literature • Wald, General Relavity • Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relavity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035 Solving the Einstein Equaons numerically INITIAL VALUE PROBLEMS Time Evolution • Par1al Differen1al Equaons generally fall into one of two classes: • Hyperbolic systems: ini1al value problems (IVP, 1me evolu1on) • Ellip1c systems: boundary problems • Einstein equaons form an IVP • Made explicit by 3+1 split, ADM formulaon • Numerical solvers can be viewed as black boxes: • Input: • Ini1al condi1on at t=0 • Evolu1on equaons: ∂tu = f(u, ∂xu, …) • Output: • Solu1on for all 1mes t≥0 Numerical Stability • In principle, could now: • Write down evolu1on equaons for γij, Kij (ADM system) • Choose some simple gauge condi1ons α, βi (e.g. α=1, βi=0: normal coordinates) • …and solve the equaons on a computer • However, it turns out that this is impossible for two (unrelated) instabili1es: • ADM system amplifies small errors in constraints (which are numerically always present) • Such simple gauge condi1ons lead to coordinate singulari1es (coordinate lines cross aer some 1me) • Numerical relavity community struggled with this for a long 1me: hard mathemacal problem BSSN System • Through trial and error, good evolu1on systems were found (family of BSSN formulaBons) • Through mathemacal analysis, another good class of evolu1on systems was found (harmonic formulaBons) • It turns out that stability crucially depends on the gauge condi1ons, hence lapse and ship cannot really be chosen freely either • Literature: Well-posedness of the BSSN system proven (and BSSN equaons/gauge condi1ons listed in detail) in Brown et al., Phys. Rev. D 79, 044023 (2009) BSSN Variables i i • ADM variables: γij, Kij, α, β , A, B (20 evolved variables) • BSSN uses a different set of variables (25 evolved variables): 1 • φ = /12 log det γij ~ -4φ • γ ij = e γij ij • K = γ Kij ~ -4φ • A ij = e (Kij - ⅓ γij K) ~I ~ij • Γ = - ∂j γ • α, βi remain • A, Bi are essen1ally 1me derivaves of α and βi • Note: there are several slightly different BSSN variants; all work fine, but they have slightly different behaviour near black holes BSSN Gauge Conditions • Time evolu1on equaons of the BSSN variables are readily determined from their defini1ons and the ADM evolu1on equaons • BSSN lapse condi1on: 1+log slicing • Similar to a harmonic 1me coordinate • Also called K driver: drives K (trace of Kij) or ∂t K to zero • BSSN shi condion: Γ driver • Somewhat similar to harmonic spaal coordinates ~I ~I • Drives Γ or ∂t Γ to zero • These gauge condi1ons can drive the coordinate system to being Cartesian (Minkowski) when space1me is flat BSSN Constraints • Since the BSSN system has more variables, it also introduces new constraints (in addi1on to Hamiltonian and momentum constraint): ~ • det γ ij = 1 ~ • trace A ij = 0 ~I ~ij ~I • Γ = - ∂j γ [definion of Γ ] • As with the Hamiltonian and momentum constraint, they need to be sasfied ini1ally, and will then be preserved during evolu1on • BSSN contains divergence cleaning terms ~ • Numerically, trace A ij = 0 needs to be enforced explicitly; the other constraints are well-behaved on their own Initial Conditions • Metric and extrinsic curvature need to sasfy constraints • Thus need to solve constraints before evolu1on – highly non-trivial step! • Typically, ini1al condi1ons are prepared in terms of ADM variables, then converted to BSSN, then evolved • ADM variables are “common language” in numerical relavity (used for ini1al condi1ons, analysis, interac1on with GR hydro, etc.) • York-Lichnerowicz procedure for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Relativity for Vacuum Binary Black Hole Luisa T
    Numerical Relativity for Vacuum Binary Black Hole Luisa T. Buchman UW Bothell SXS collaboration (Caltech) Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics Albert Einstein Institute GWA NW @ LIGO Hanford Observatory June 25, 2019 Outline • What is numerical relativity? • What is its role in the detection and interpretation of gravitational waves? What is numerical relativity for binary black holes? • 3 stages for binary black hole coalescence: • inspiral • merger • ringdown • Inspiral waveform: Post-Newtonian approximations • Ringdown waveform: perturbation theory • Merger of 2 black holes: • extremely energetic, nonlinear, dynamical and violent • the strongest GW signal • warpage of spacetime • strong gravity regime The Einstein equations: • Gμν = 8πTμν • encodes all of gravity • 10 equations which would take up ~100 pages if no abbreviations or simplifications used (and if written in terms of the spacetime metric alone) • pencil and paper solutions possible only with spherical (Schwarzschild) or axisymmetric (Kerr) symmetries. • Vacuum: G = 0 μν (empty space with no matter) Numerical Relativity is: • Directly solving the full dynamical Einstein field equations using high-performance computing. • A very difficult problem: • the first attempts at numerical simulations of binary black holes was in the 1960s (Hahn and Lindquist) and mid-1970s (Smarr and others). • the full 3D problem remained unsolved until 2005 (Frans Pretorius, followed quickly by 2 other groups- Campanelli et al., Baker et al.). Solving Einstein’s Equations on a Computer •
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Gauge Polyvalent Numerical Relativity Code: Numerical Methods, Boundary Conditions and Different Formulations
    UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS Towards a gauge polyvalent numerical relativity code: numerical methods, boundary conditions and different formulations per Carles Bona-Casas Tesi presentada per a l'obtenci´o del t´ıtolde doctor a la Facultat de Ci`encies Departament de F´ısica Dirigida per: Prof. Carles Bona Garcia i Dr. Joan Mass´oBenn`assar "The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be." Douglas Adams. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge everyone who ever taught me something. Specially my supervisors who, at least in the beginning, had to suffer my eyes, puzzling at their faces, saying that I had the impression that what they were explaining to me was some unreachable knowledge. It turns out that there is not such a thing and they have finally managed to make me gain some insight in this world of relativity and computing. They have also infected me the disease of worrying about calculations and stuff that most people wouldn't care about and my hair doesn't seem very happy with it, but I still love them for that. Many thanks to everyone in the UIB relativity group and to all the PhD. students who have shared some time with me. Work is less hard in their company. Special thanks to Carlos, Denis, Sasha and Dana for all their very useful comments and for letting me play with their work and codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Relativity
    Paper presented at the 13th Int. Conf on General Relativity and Gravitation 373 Cordoba, Argentina, 1992: Part 2, Workshop Summaries Numerical relativity Takashi Nakamura Yulcawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, JAPAN In GR13 we heard many reports on recent. progress as well as future plans of detection of gravitational waves. According to these reports (see the report of the workshop on the detection of gravitational waves by Paik in this volume), it is highly probable that the sensitivity of detectors such as laser interferometers and ultra low temperature resonant bars will reach the level of h ~ 10—21 by 1998. in this level we may expect the detection of the gravitational waves from astrophysical sources such as coalescing binary neutron stars once a year or so. Therefore the progress in numerical relativity is urgently required to predict the wave pattern and amplitude of the gravitational waves from realistic astrophysical sources. The time left for numerical relativists is only six years or so although there are so many difficulties in principle as well as in practice. Apart from detection of gravitational waves, numerical relativity itself has a final goal: Solve the Einstein equations numerically for (my initial data as accurately as possible and clarify physics in strong gravity. in GRIIS there were six oral presentations and ll poster papers on recent progress in numerical relativity. i will make a brief review of six oral presenta— tions. The Regge calculus is one of methods to investigate spacetimes numerically. Brewin from Monash University Australia presented a paper Particle Paths in a Schwarzshild Spacetime via.
    [Show full text]
  • The Initial Data Problem for 3+1 Numerical Relativity Part 2
    The initial data problem for 3+1 numerical relativity Part 2 Eric Gourgoulhon Laboratoire Univers et Th´eories (LUTH) CNRS / Observatoire de Paris / Universit´eParis Diderot F-92190 Meudon, France [email protected] http://www.luth.obspm.fr/∼luthier/gourgoulhon/ 2008 International Summer School on Computational Methods in Gravitation and Astrophysics Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics, Pohang, Korea 28 July - 1 August 2008 Eric Gourgoulhon (LUTH) Initial data problem 2 / 2 APCTP School, 31 July 2008 1 / 41 Plan 1 Helical symmetry for binary systems 2 Initial data for orbiting binary black holes 3 Initial data for orbiting binary neutron stars 4 Initial data for orbiting black hole - neutron star systems 5 References for lectures 1-3 Eric Gourgoulhon (LUTH) Initial data problem 2 / 2 APCTP School, 31 July 2008 2 / 41 Helical symmetry for binary systems Outline 1 Helical symmetry for binary systems 2 Initial data for orbiting binary black holes 3 Initial data for orbiting binary neutron stars 4 Initial data for orbiting black hole - neutron star systems 5 References for lectures 1-3 Eric Gourgoulhon (LUTH) Initial data problem 2 / 2 APCTP School, 31 July 2008 3 / 41 Helical symmetry for binary systems Helical symmetry for binary systems Physical assumption: when the two objects are sufficiently far apart, the radiation reaction can be neglected ⇒ closed orbits Gravitational radiation reaction circularizes the orbits ⇒ circular orbits Geometrical translation: spacetime possesses some helical symmetry Helical Killing vector ξ:
    [Show full text]
  • 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity
    3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity Lecture notes Eric´ Gourgoulhon Laboratoire Univers et Th´eories, UMR 8102 du C.N.R.S., Observatoire de Paris, Universit´eParis 7 arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 6 Mar 2007 F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France [email protected] 6 March 2007 2 Contents 1 Introduction 11 2 Geometry of hypersurfaces 15 2.1 Introduction.................................... 15 2.2 Frameworkandnotations . .... 15 2.2.1 Spacetimeandtensorfields . 15 2.2.2 Scalar products and metric duality . ...... 16 2.2.3 Curvaturetensor ............................... 18 2.3 Hypersurfaceembeddedinspacetime . ........ 19 2.3.1 Definition .................................... 19 2.3.2 Normalvector ................................. 21 2.3.3 Intrinsiccurvature . 22 2.3.4 Extrinsiccurvature. 23 2.3.5 Examples: surfaces embedded in the Euclidean space R3 .......... 24 2.4 Spacelikehypersurface . ...... 28 2.4.1 Theorthogonalprojector . 29 2.4.2 Relation between K and n ......................... 31 ∇ 2.4.3 Links between the and D connections. .. .. .. .. .. 32 ∇ 2.5 Gauss-Codazzirelations . ...... 34 2.5.1 Gaussrelation ................................. 34 2.5.2 Codazzirelation ............................... 36 3 Geometry of foliations 39 3.1 Introduction.................................... 39 3.2 Globally hyperbolic spacetimes and foliations . ............. 39 3.2.1 Globally hyperbolic spacetimes . ...... 39 3.2.2 Definition of a foliation . 40 3.3 Foliationkinematics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... 41 3.3.1 Lapsefunction ................................. 41 3.3.2 Normal evolution vector . 42 3.3.3 Eulerianobservers ............................. 42 3.3.4 Gradients of n and m ............................. 44 3.3.5 Evolution of the 3-metric . 45 4 CONTENTS 3.3.6 Evolution of the orthogonal projector . ....... 46 3.4 Last part of the 3+1 decomposition of the Riemann tensor .
    [Show full text]
  • GW190521: a Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine Physics Faculty Research & Creative Works Physics 04 Sep 2020 GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙ R. Abbott T. D. Abbott Marco Cavaglia Missouri University of Science and Technology, [email protected] For full list of authors, see publisher's website. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/phys_facwork Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Recommended Citation R. Abbott et al., "GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙," Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, no. 10, American Physical Society (APS), Sep 2020. The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This Article - Journal is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Faculty Research & Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 125, 101102 (2020) Editors' Suggestion Featured in Physics GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙ R. Abbott et al.* (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (Received 30 May 2020; revised 19 June 2020; accepted 9 July 2020; published 2 September 2020) On May 21, 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observed a short duration gravitational-wave signal, GW190521, with a three-detector network signal-to-noise ratio of 14.7, and an estimated false-alarm rate of 1 in 4900 yr using a search sensitive to generic transients.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Relativity
    Numerical Relativity Sascha Husa The Sound of Space-time Sao Paulo, December 2018 Numerical Relativity Sascha Husa The Sound of Space-time Sao Paulo, December 2018 Numerical Relativity including alternative gravity Sascha Husa The Sound of Space-time Sao Paulo, December 2018 • Mathematical problems and exact solutions have dominated GR until recently. Deep insights gained: positive mass theorem, nonlinear stability of Minkowski spacetime . • Astrophysics, cosmology, general understanding of the solution space of the EE require approximate solutions – analytical and numerical! • Numerical solutions allow to study the equations (in principle) without simplifying physical assumptions, and allow mathematical control over the convergence of the approximation! What we will talk about, and what not. • Only talk about classical gravity, no computational quantum gravity! • Solve Einstein Equations as PDEs, alternatively discretize geometry directly (e.g. Regge calculus, discrete differential forms, . ). 10 lectures + some practical problems Practical Problems • Choose 1 of 3 Tracks: • ODEs: post-Newton black holes to leading order. • Wave equation in 1+1 dimensions. • Scalar field in AdS • Choose a programming language you are familiar with. I can help with Fortran, C, Python, Mathematica. • Some worked out codes can be provided, but try yourself first. 1. Initial value problems for GR Motivation • Classical physics is formulated in terms of PDEs for tensor fields. • To understand a physical theory (GR, Maxwell, QCD, ...) requires to understand the
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Problems in General Relativity
    NUMERICAL PROBLEMS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY DOUGLAS N. ARNOLD Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA The construction of gravitational wave observatories is one of the greatest scientific efforts of our time. As a result, there is presently a strong need to numerically sim- ulate the emission of gravitation radiation from massive astronomical events such as black hole collisions. This entails the numerical solution of the Einstein field equations. We briefly describe the field equations in their natural setting, namely as statements about the geometry of space time. Next we describe the compli- cated system that arises when the field equations are recast as partial differential equations, and discuss procedures for deriving from them a more tractable sys- tem consisting of constraint equations to be satisfied by initial data and together with evolution equations. We present some applications of modern finite element technology to the solution of the constraint equations in order to find initial data relevant to black hole collisions. We conclude by enumerating some of the many computational challenges that remain. 1 General relativity and gravity waves: the scientific problem In the theory of general relativity spacetime is a smooth four-dimensional manifold endowed with a pseudo-Riemannian metric.aThe metric determines the intrinsic curvature of the manifold, and the Einstein field equations relate the curvature of the metric at a point of spacetime to the mass-energy there. All bodies in free fall, that is, bodies not subject to any external forces other than gravity, trace out a geodesic in spacetime. Thus gravity|rather than being a force-field defined throughout space|is just a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Relativity: Instituto De Ciencias Instituto De Ciencias UNAMUNAM Nuclearesnucleares on Overview of the Field and Recent Results on Black Hole Simulations
    Numerical Relativity: Instituto de Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias UNAMUNAM NuclearesNucleares On overview of the field and recent results on black hole simulations Miguel Alcubierre Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM, Mexico SIAM Conference, Philadelphia, August 2010 Gravitational wave detectors InstitutoInstitutode de Ciencias Ciencias UNAM Nucleares UNAM NuclearesA global network of gravitational wave detectors in now either in an advanced state of construction, or actually taking data! The collision of compact objects (black holes, neutron stars) is considered one of the most promising sources for detection in the next few years. TAMA, Tokio VIRGO, Pisa LIGO,Washington GEO 600, Hanover LIGO, Louisiana The future: LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) Instituto de Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias UNAMUNAM NuclearesNucleares Einstein’s field equations Instituto de Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias UNAMUNAM NuclearesNucleares The dynamics of the gravitational field are described by the Einstein field equations: G 8 3,2,1,0 These equations relate the geometry of space‐time (the left hand side) with the distribution of mass and energy (the right hand side). Einstein’s equations form a system of 10 non‐linear, coupled, partial differential equations in 4 dimensions. Written on a general coordinate system they can have thousands of terms! Numerical relativity Instituto de Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias UNAMUNAM NuclearesNucleares There are books full of exact solutions to Einstein’s equations, but few of those solutions have a clear astrophysical interpretation. Exact solutions are typically found by asking for space‐time to have a high degree of symmetry: • Schwarzschild black hole: Static and spherically symmetric. • Kerr black hole: Stationary and axially symmetric.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Relativity Beyond General Relativity
    Numerical Relativity beyond General Relativity Thesis by Maria Okounkova In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2019 Defended May 1st, 2019 ii © 2019 Maria Okounkova ORCID: 0000-0001-7869-5496 All rights reserved iii Space may be the final frontier but it’s made in a Hollywood basement - Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have many wonderful colleagues to thank for the work presented in this thesis. Thank you to Saul Teukolsky, my advisor, for all of the physics discussions we have had over the years. Your suggestions and advice are always helpful. Thank you to Mark Scheel, for teaching me about numerical relativity, and patiently answering questions about code. Thank you to (Professor!) Leo Stein, for motivating me to delve deeper into theory. Thank you to Daniel Hemberger, for all of the work that you have put into developing a good, working code, and for your ever-inspiring coding practices. Thank you to Swetha Bhagwat, for being an amazing co-author. Thank you to the other members of the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) collaboration, for all of your help over the years. Thank you to my additional coauthors, Matthew Giesler, Duncan Brown, and Stefan Ballmer. Thank you to my committee members, Rana Adhikari, Yanbei Chen, Sergei Gukov, and Alan Weinstein, for your interest in this work. v ABSTRACT Einstein’s theory of general relativity has passed all precision tests to date. At some length scale, however, general relativity (GR) must break down and be reconciled with quantum mechanics in a quantum theory of gravity (a beyond-GR theory).
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Relativity from a Gauge Theory Perspective Will M. Farr
    Numerical Relativity from a Gauge Theory Perspective by Will M. Farr B.S. Physics California Institute of Technology, 2003 Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2010 c Will M. Farr, MMX. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author.............................................................. Department of Physics 30 September 2009 Certified by. Edmund Bertschinger Professor of Physics Head, Department of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by......................................................... Krishna Rajagopal Professor of Physics Associate Department Head for Education 2 Numerical Relativity from a Gauge Theory Perspective by Will M. Farr Submitted to the Department of Physics on 30 September 2009, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract I present a new method for numerical simulations of general relativistic systems that eliminates constraint violating modes without the need for constraint damping or the introduction of extra dynamical fields. The method is a type of variational integrator. It is based on a discretization of an action for gravity (the Pleba´nski action) on an un- structured mesh that preserves the local Lorentz transformation and diffeomorphism symmetries of the continuous action. Applying Hamilton’s principle of stationary action gives discrete field equations on the mesh. For each gauge degree of freedom there is a corresponding discrete constraint; the remaining discrete evolution equa- tions exactly preserve these constraints under time-evolution. I validate the method using simulations of several analytically solvable spacetimes: a weak gravitational wave spacetime, the Schwarzschild spacetime, and the Kerr spacetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical-Relativity Simulations of the Quasi-Circular Inspiral and Merger of Non-Spinning, Charged Black Holes: Methods and Comparison with Approximate Approaches
    Numerical-relativity simulations of the quasi-circular inspiral and merger of non-spinning, charged black holes: methods and comparison with approximate approaches Gabriele Bozzola1, ∗ and Vasileios Paschalidis1, 2, y 1Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA (Dated: April 15, 2021) We present fully general relativistic simulations of the quasi-circular inspiral and merger of charged, non-spinning, binary black holes with charge-to-mass ratio λ 0:3. We discuss the key fea- tures that enabled long term and stable evolutions of these binaries. We≤ also present a formalism for computing the angular momentum carried away by electromagnetic waves, and the electromagnetic contribution to black-hole horizon properties. We implement our formalism and present the results for the first time in numerical-relativity simulations. In addition, we compare our full non-linear solutions with existing approximate models for the inspiral and ringdown phases. We show that Newtonian models based on the quadrupole approximation have errors of 20 %{100 % in key gauge- invariant quantities. On the other hand, for the systems considered, we find that estimates of the remnant black hole spin based on the motion of test particles in Kerr-Newman spacetimes agree with our non-linear calculations to within a few percent. Finally, we discuss the prospects for detecting black hole charge by future gravitational-wave detectors using either the inspiral-merger-ringdown signal or the ringdown signal alone. I. INTRODUCTION detect these signals and perform the associated param- eter estimations. Therefore, it should come to no sur- In previous work [1,2], we initiated a systematic pro- prise that the scarcity of simulations of compact binary gram to study the interactions between charged black mergers in modified theories of gravity [9] severely lim- holes in full non-linear Einstein-Maxwell theory.
    [Show full text]