DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Baptist and Scientific Perspectives on Creation Science and Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Baptist and Scientific Perspectives on Creation Science and Evolution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`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a_!/.3![D+/*! 12!5/1*+a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email protected]!*+,!6(9/.A1!',.*,-!*(!#/A9(-=!$(;,!(5! *+,2,!D,-,!V),2*1(.2!E!313.b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c3,201*,!*+12!.(*!@,1.B!/!4/2)/9!4(.7,-2/*1(.!*(014d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
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals
    UNDERSTANDING THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONIST MOVEMENT: ITS TRUE NATURE AND GOALS A POSITION PAPER FROM THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY OFFICE OF PUBLIC POLICY AUTHOR: BARBARA FORREST, Ph.D. Reviewing Committee: Paul Kurtz, Ph.D.; Austin Dacey, Ph.D.; Stuart D. Jordan, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Lindsay, J. D., Ph.D.; John Shook, Ph.D.; Toni Van Pelt DATED: MAY 2007 ( AMENDED JULY 2007) Copyright © 2007 Center for Inquiry, Inc. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the Center for Inquiry, Inc. Table of Contents Section I. Introduction: What is at stake in the dispute over intelligent design?.................. 1 Section II. What is the intelligent design creationist movement? ........................................ 2 Section III. The historical and legal background of intelligent design creationism ................ 6 Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) ............................................................................ 6 McLean v. Arkansas (1982) .............................................................................. 6 Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) ............................................................................. 7 Section IV. The ID movement’s aims and strategy .............................................................. 9 The “Wedge Strategy” .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Earth Is Flat! Exploring the Mental Models of the Solar System in the Foundation Phase K
    THE EARTH IS FLAT! EXPLORING THE MENTAL MODELS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM IN THE FOUNDATION PHASE K. Nthimbane1, S. Ramsaroop2 & F. Naude3 University of Johannesburg [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT- This paper aims at describing the changes in the mental models that foundation phase learners construct about the relationships between the Earth, the Sun and the Moon. A series of clinical interviews were conducted with Foundation phase learners at a primary school in Soweto, Johannesburg, to elicit their thinking in relation to the shape, colour and relative positions of the Earth, the Sun and the Moon. The participants in this study consisted of 10 grade R and 10 grade three learners. Learners constructed their representations of the Earth, the Sun and the Moon using clay. From this, their intuitive ideas about colours and shapes of these objects became evident. The question this research asks is: “How do learners’ concepts of the relationships between the Earth, Moon, and Sun change throughout the foundation phase?” Data was collected through interviews and video recordings and was analyzed using open coding. The findings revealed that there is a marked change between the flat Earth models that are prevalent with the grade R sample and the spherical depictions made by the grade 3 learners. The findings further show that despite the changes in representations of the shape of the Earth, most learners still hold a geocentric model of the solar system. The authors recommend that foundation phase teachers use the protocol that was developed for these interviews as a means to establish the intuitive theories that children hold before attempting to teach content relating to weather, seasons, day/night cycles and the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Creationism, Geocentricity and the Flat Earth These Three Movements Have More in Common Than They Like to Acknowledge
    Scientific Creationism, Geocentricity and the Flat Earth These three movements have more in common than they like to acknowledge Robert Schadewald Evolution is a scientific fairy-tale just as the "flat-earth theory" was in the 12th century. —Edward Blick, scientific creationist1 Poor flat-earthers! Few modern intellectual movements have been so widely scorned and misunderstood. Among Christians, religious tolerance and ecumenicalism seem to break down at the edge of the earth. The opening quotation suggests the contempt that most "scientific creationists" feel for the flat-earthers. Comparing them to evolutionists is an especially low blow, since the flat-earthers have always been in the forefront of the battle against evolution. Though flat-earthism is as well-supported scripturally and scientifically as creationism, the creationists plainly do not want to be associated with flat-earthers. In a public debate with creationist Duane Gish, paleontologist Michael Voorhies suggested that the Creation Research Society resembled the Flat Earth Society. According to a report of the debate published in the creationist newsletter Acts & Facts, Gish replied that not a single member of the Creation Research Society was a member of the Flat Earth Society and that Voorhies's linking of the two was nothing more than a smear.2 Gish's remarks brought a rejoinder in the Flat Earth News from an outraged letter writer (identified only as "G.J.D.") who had read the Acts & Facts report. "G.J.D."contested Gish's claim that no members of the Flat Earth Society belong to the Creation Research Society, concluding, "He doesn't know what he's talking about, as I belong to both, and I am writing to him to let him know that he is wrong."3 Ironically, Gish may have created a fact.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of Life's Origin
    The Mystery of Life’s Origin The Continuing Controversy CHARLES B. THAXTON, WALTER L. BRADLEY, ROGER L. OLSEN, JAMES TOUR, STEPHEN MEYER, JONATHAN WELLS, GUILLERMO GONZALEZ, BRIAN MILLER, DAVID KLINGHOFFER Seattle Discovery Institute Press 2020 Description The origin of life from non-life remains one of the most enduring mysteries of modern science. The Mystery of Life’s Origin: The Continuing Controversy investigates how close scientists are to solving that mystery and explores what we are learning about the origin of life from current research in chemistry, physics, astrobiology, biochemistry, and more. The book includes an updated version of the classic text The Mystery of Life’s Origin by Charles Thaxton, Walter Bradley, and Roger Olsen, and new chapters on the current state of the debate by chemist James Tour, physicist Brian Miller, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, biologist Jonathan Wells, and philosopher of science Stephen C. Meyer. Copyright Notice Copyright © 2020 by Discovery Institute, All Rights Reserved. Library Cataloging Data The Mystery of Life’s Origin: The Continuing Controversy by Charles B. Thaxton, Walter L. Bradley, Roger L, Olsen, James Tour, Stephen Meyer, Jonathan Wells, Guillermo Gonzalez, Brian Miller, and David Klinghoffer 486 pages, 6 x 9 x 1.0 inches & 1.4 lb, 229 x 152 x 25 mm. & 0.65 kg Library of Congress Control Number: 9781936599745 ISBN-13: 978-1-936599-74-5 (paperback), 978-1-936599-75-2 (Kindle), 978-1-936599-76-9 (EPUB) BISAC: SCI013040 SCIENCE / Chemistry / Organic BISAC: SCI013030 SCIENCE / Chemistry / Inorganic BISAC: SCI007000 SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Biochemistry BISAC: SCI075000 SCIENCE / Philosophy & Social Aspects Publisher Information Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104 Internet: http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/ Published in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Catastrophism and Geology
    BIBLICAL CATASTROPHISM AND GEOLOGY HENRY M. MORRIS Professor of Civi I Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute Theories of catastrophism in geological interpretation are not new. Prior to the time of Sir Charles Lyell, scientists generally believed that most geological formations must be attributed to great physical catastrophes or revolutions. Lyell, however, taught that these phenomena could be explained by the ordinary processes of nature, acting over vast expanses of geological time. This is his "principle of uniformitarianism, II. now almost universally accepted as the foundation princ~ple of modern historical geology. Profoundly influenced by LyelPs theories, Charles Darwin soon published his theory of evolu­ tion by natural selection. The supposed paleontologi cal record of the evolutionary history of life on earth, together with the principle of uniformity, now constitutes the interpretive framework within which all data of historical geology are supposed to be explained. Furthermore, this phil­ osophy of evolutionary uniformitarianism now serves also as the interpretive framework in the social sciences and economi cs, and even in the study of religion itself. Thus a superstructure of gigantic size has been erected on the Lyellian-Darwinian foundation. However, catastrophism is not dead. The inadequacies of a thorough-going uniformitarianism have become increasingly obvious in recent years, and such quasi-catastrophist concepts as wan­ dering continents, shifting poles, slipping crusts, meteoritic and cometary collisions, etc., are appearing more and more frequently in geological literature. It is, in fact, generally recognized that even the ordinary fossiliferous deposits of the sedimentary rocks must often have at least a semi-catastrophist basis, since the process of fossilization usually requires rather rapid burial, under conditions seldom encountered in the modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Biophysical Information Transfer Mechanisms (Nbit)(U)
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 10 April 2018 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. 27305 W. Live Oak Road Suite #1203 Castaic, CA 91384 Reference: F-2018-01307 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is a final response to your 3 April 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, received in the office of the Information and Privacy Coordinator on 4 April 2018, for the following document: Parapsychology and AI Research Report, 75-11096. We conducted a search of our previously released database and located the document you requested, consisting of 118 pages. Because you are entitled to the first 100 pages free and the remaining amount would be minimal, there is no charge for processing your request. If you have any questions regarding our response, you may contact us at: Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Information and Privacy Coordinator 703-613-3007 (Fax) Sincerely, Allison Fong Information and Privacy Coordinator Enclosure I {co3o 6367 6 Approved For Release 2002/10/21 : CIA-RDP79-00999A000300070001-4 SG1A Approved For Release 2002/10/21 : CIA-RDP79-00999A000300070001-4 SG11 Approved For Release 2002/10/21 : CIA-RDP79-00999A000300070001-4 C03063676 I I Approved For Release 2002/10/21 : CIA-RDP79-00999A000300070001-4 SECRET Copy No.3 Final Report NOVEL BIOPHYSICAL INFORMATION TRANSFER MECHANISMS (NBIT)(U) January 14, 1976 SG1A Document No.
    [Show full text]
  • Polanyi Review Committee Report
    THE EXTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT BAYLOR UNIVERSITY The External Review Committee was convened to review the status of the Michael Polanyi Center at Baylor University, which was established a year ago with the primary aim of advancing the understanding of the sciences. In the early summer, members of the Committee received copies of books and articles relevant to the work of the Center. On September 8 and 9, 2000, the Committee met to discuss what they had read, to hear from persons who addressed matters about which the Committee was concerned, and to formulate a response to the charge the Committee had been given. The vigorous discussions about the issues contained in the charge reflected the variety in the backgrounds and perspectives of the Committee members. The outcome of these discussions was a thorough and even- handed review of the concerns before the Committee. It is important from the outset to emphasize that the sciences at Baylor University are the inheritors of a long and distinguished tradition. For many years, undergraduate instruction in the sciences at Baylor has been conducted in an exciting and effective manner. The graduate and research programs are solid and well respected throughout the scientific community. Not only have students and faculty been active in the mainstream of scientific disciplines, but they have also pursued initiatives in new areas and directions. Baylor’s heritage, in this regard, is clearly one of which it can be proud. The relationship of the sciences to other academic fields is a further responsibility that Baylor seeks to address. Relationships between the sciences and the humanities, as well as issues relating to the environment and public policy, are matters of real concern to the Baylor community.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach?
    Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education Bio: Dr. Eugenie C. Scott is Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc., a not-for-profit membership organization of scientists, teachers, and others that works to improve the teaching of evolution and of science as a way of knowing. It opposes the teaching of “scientific” creationism and other religiously based views in science classes. A former college professor, Dr. Scott lectures widely and is called upon by the press and other media to explain science and evolution to the general public. Scott is the author of the 2004 book, Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction, and has served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Scott has been honored by both scientists and educators by being awarded the National Science Board Public Service Award, the AIBS Outstanding Service Award, the Geological Society of America Public Service Award, and the California Science Teachers Association Distinguished Service Award. She holds a Ph.D. in physical anthropology from the University of Missouri, an honorary D.Sc. from McGill University, and an honorary Doctor of Science from Ohio State University. Abstract: In this essay, I sketch an overview of the foundations of the creation/evolution debate in the United States today. Evolution is rejected by many Americans because it conflicts with their religious views. This conflict may occur because evolution is not compatible with biblical literalism, or because evolution creates other problems in Christian theology. Most Americans do not belong to Christian traditions that require a literal interpretation of the Bible; in addition, there is a long tradition of accommodation of evolution and science to Christian theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian Physicist Examines Noah's Flood and Plate Tectonics
    A Christian Physicist Examines Noah’s Flood and Plate Tectonics by Steven Ball, Ph.D. September 2003 Dedication I dedicate this work to my friend and colleague Rodric White-Stevens, who delighted in discussing with me the geologic wonders of the Earth and their relevance to Biblical faith. Cover picture courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey, copyright free 1 Introduction It seems that no subject stirs the passions of those intending to defend biblical truth more than Noah’s Flood. It is perhaps the one biblical account that appears to conflict with modern science more than any other. Many aspiring Christian apologists have chosen to use this account as a litmus test of whether one accepts the Bible or modern science as true. Before we examine this together, let me clarify that I accept the account of Noah’s Flood as completely true, just as I do the entirety of the Bible. The Bible demonstrates itself to be reliable and remarkably consistent, having numerous interesting participants in various stories through which is interwoven a continuous theme of God’s plan for man’s redemption. Noah’s Flood is one of those stories, revealing to us both God’s judgment of sin and God’s over-riding grace and mercy. It remains a timeless account, for it has much to teach us about a God who never changes. It is one of the most popular Bible stories for children, and the truth be known, for us adults as well. It is rather unfortunate that many dismiss the account as mythical, simply because it seems to be at odds with a scientific view of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology & Science Fact Sheet
    © 2006 Summit Ministries (summit.org) BIOLOGY & SCIENCE FACT SHEET KEY VERSES: Genesis 1 John 1:1–3 Hebrews 11:3 Mark 10:6 Colossians 1:16–17 KEY PUBLICATIONS: Answers Magazine | www.answersingenesis.org | Creation Research Society Quarterly | www.creationresearch.org | Acts & Facts | www.icr.org | KEY QUOTES: Evolutionists "Evolution is a fact amply demonstrated by the fossil record and by contemporary molecular biology. Natural selection is a successful theory devised to explain the fact of evolution."1 "Man is the result of a purposeless and natural process that did not have him in mind. He was not planned. He is a state of matter, a form of life, a sort of animal, and a species of the Order Primates, akin nearly or remotely to all of life and indeed to all that is material."2 "Biology teaches us that the species man was not specially created but is merely, in a long chain of evolutionary changes of forms of life, the last link, made in the likeness not of God but of nothing so much as an ape."3 "With me, the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind, which has been developed from the mind of lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?"4 Creationists/ID "The essential point of creation has nothing to do with the timing or the mechanism the Creator chose to employ, but with the element of design or purpose.
    [Show full text]