Socialist Constructions: Modern Urban Housing and Social Practice By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socialist Constructions: Modern Urban Housing and Social Practice By Socialist Constructions: Modern Urban Housing and Social Practice By Natallia Barykina A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Geography University of Toronto © Copyright by Natallia Barykina 2015 ii Socialist Constructions: Modern Urban Housing and Social Practice Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Natallia Barykina Department of Geography University of Toronto Abstract My dissertation, “Socialist Constructions: Modern Urban Housing and Social Practice,” investigates the modernist production of living space by focusing on housing reform in Weimar Germany’s Berlin and Frankfurt am Main as well as on the subsequent projects of German modernist architects working in the USSR in the early 1930s. Broadly, my work addresses questions of urban politics (primarily in Germany and Soviet Union), ownership, modernist urban visions, and everyday living practices. I take as a starting point the claim that home was central to the production of modern subjectivity, and, more specifically, that suburban public housing was instrumental in the production of Weimar modernity. By surveying a range of constitutive material and discursive elements for these new forms of settlement (including new technologies and construction methods, state and civic managerial bureaucracies, struggles over finance policies, discursive, aesthetic, and propagandistic legitimizing strategies, etc.), I look at how suburban, large scale, and publicly funded housing estates ( Großsiedlung ) were organized, constructed, and inhabited. Informed by a conceptual model of “coproduction,” I aim to articulate how domesticity and public housing figured in the production of modern subjects and sensibilities and to re- connect discussions of policies to understandings of the sphere of the home as a site of everyday iii life, paying close attention to spaces that shape and produce—and are produced by—complex networks of social practices in the modern city. I investigate the ways in which different actors (Social Democratic government, city planners, municipal authorities, housewife associations, residents) involved themselves in the construction, legitimation and provision of emerging modern organizations of space. My case studies target specific and resonant sites of coproduction of the modern home: Martin Wagner’s and Bruno Taut’s housing estate Hufeisensiedlung in Berlin; the International Congress of Modern Architecture (CIAM) in Frankfurt, which introduced the notion of “minimal dwelling”; such minimalist innovations as Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky’s Frankfurt kitchen; and the new industrial cities of the USSR, where German architects worked to adapt concepts of “minimal living” into a different cultural context. iv Acknowledgments For her guidance, insight, and patience, I would like to thank my Supervisor, Sue Ruddick. Let me acknowledge as well the great support and critical advice I have received from all members of my committee, Matt Farish, Kanishka Goonewardena, Mark Hunter, and Thomas Lahusen. Thanks to my parents and my sister Olga as well. For friendship and insightful feedback I thank Margaret Haderer, Iris Mendel, Nora Ruck, Regina Sidel, and Christine Decker. I am immensely grateful to the librarians and archivists who helped me with this project. I am most grateful to my husband, Art Redding, who read many drafts of this dissertation, for his constant support, encouragement and confidence. This work is dedicated to a dear friend, Antje Lachmann. You are greatly missed. v Table of Contents INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………….….1 Theoretical Influences……………………………………………………………………...….6 Archives: Putting the Story Together. Overview of Chapters…………………………………………………………………………...………...…19 CHAPTER 1. The Reform of Public Housing in Weimar Berlin during the late 1920’s…….25 Federal Legal and Financial Mechanisms and Local Municipal Housing Programmes……....27 Mechanisms of Government Involvement: GEHAG. Role of Hufeisensiedlung for SPD….....35 Housing Reform as Urban Spatial Reorganization…………………………………….……...42 Hufeisensiedlung as New Suburban Form of Settlement………………………………….….51 CHAPTER 2. “The Dissolution of Cities”: Mass Housing in Weimar Germany, from “The Largest Tenement City in the World” to Suburban Settlements……………………….…..…56 Weimar Housing Reformers’ Critique of Mietskaserne : Siedlung as a Solution to the Housing Crisis……………………………………………………………………..………………..…..57 Bruno Taut and Martin Wagner: Efficient and Communal Living………………………..…..67 CHAPTER 3. The Reform of Domestic Space and the Rationalization of Everyday Life: “Wohnung für Existenzminimum”……………………………………………..…………..….81 Theorizing the Rationalization of Home…...…………………………………………………………………………….....….…85 The Rationalization of Home: the Second International Congress of Modern Architecture, Frankfurt am Main………………………………………………………………………...….90 The Frankfurt Kitchen…………………………………………………………………….….108 Hufeisensiedlung : Rationalization as a “Cultural Model”………………………………....…121 CHAPTER 4. Modernity and "Uneven Development": German Modernist Architects and Planners in the USSR………………………………………………………………………….142 Foreign Architects’ Work in Soviet Industrial Cities: Context………………………………..144 “Western” Architects’ Expectations and Practices within an Emergent Doctrine of Socialist Realism…………….……………………………………………………………………….…..152 vi Working Conditions: Industrialization and Forced Labour in the “New Cities”……………….162 CONCLUSION. Preserving and Discarding the Architectural Modernist Legacy in Contemporary Germany and Russia………………………………….……………………...…188 NOTES………………………………………………………………………………………….201 APPENDIX: ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………….228 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………….….……..235 vii Table of Illustrations Illustration 1: from Bruno Taut, Bauen der neue Wohnbau . Leipzig und Berlin, 1927, 65. Illustrations 2 and 3: Falkenberg, architect Bruno Taut, 1913-1916. Photographs by author. Illustrations 4 and 5: colours in Hufeisensiedlung. Photographs by author. Illustration 6: from “Reichswohnungsbauprogramm” in Wohnungswirtschaft 3/17 (1926) Illustration 7: “Die Auflösung der Städte,” 1920. From Junghanns, Kurt. Bruno Taut, 1880- 1938 . Berlin: Henschelverlag, 1970. Abbildung 70 and 71. Illustration 8: Frankfurt kitchen installation, Museum der Dinge , Berlin, December 2010. Photograph by author. Illustrations 9 and 10: from Erna Meyer, “Verbesserte Arbeitsmethoden.” Baugilde 14 (25 Aug 1932): 783-784. Illustration 11: from “Die Küche Der Klein- und Mittelwohnung.” Reichsforschungsgesellschaft für Wirtschaftlichkeit im Bau- und Wohnungswesen. Gruppe II 6, nr. 2 (Juni 1928). Illustration 12: cover of Taut, Bruno. Die Neue Wohnung: Die Frau als Schöpferin . 5th ed. Leipzig: Verlag Klinkhardt and Bierman, 1928. Illustration 13: from Taut, Bruno. Die Neue Wohnung: Die Frau als Schöpferin, 57. Illustration 14: from “Kleinstwohnungsgrundrisse.” EINFA Nachrichtenblatt 1/4 (1930): 4. Illustration 15: from Hans Leistikow, “Deutsche Bauen in der UdSSR.” Das Neue Frankfurt 9, 1930. Englert und Schlosser: Frankfurt am Main. Illustration 16: from Novokuznetsk. Ed. A. Vypov. Moskva: Sovetskaia Rossia, 1983, 58. Illustration 17: from Mart Stam folder, Planungschema der Stadt Orsk . Sotsgorod Orsk. 003- 422-008. Archiv des Deutschen Architekturmuseums, Frankfurt am Main. viii Note on Sources The research for this dissertation was made possible by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Research Scholarship (2010-2011) and Doctoral Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) (2010-2012). In Berlin, I consulted the magazines and architectural periodicals held at the Staatsbibliothek, Bauhaus- archiv, Archiv der Akademie der Künste and Werkbundarchiv-Museum der Dinge . In Vienna, I consulted Margarete Schütte-Lihotsky archive at Universität für angewandte Kunst and in Frankfurt am Main I consulted the Mart Stam and Hannes Meyer collections at the Deutsches Arkhitekturmuseum . I accessed the Archives of the Soviet Communist Party and Soviet State Microfilm Collection located at the State Archives of the Russian Federation ( Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii , GARF) at the Lamont library at Harvard University, where some materials of the collections are on microfilm. The complete original archives are in Moscow. These Russian archival documents are cited according to the collection (fond), inventory (opis’), file (delo) and folio (list, l in singular, ll in the plural). All archival sources along with secondary sources are cited in the Bibliography in alphabetical order. 1 INTRODUCTION Pondering the interdependency of social transformation and everyday living space, Henri Lefebvre points out in The Production of Space that there is no easy or quick answer to the question of ‘socialism’s’ space; much careful thought is called for here. It may be that the revolutionary period, the period of intense change, merely establishes the preconditions for a new space, and that the realization of that space calls for a rather longer period-for a period of calm. The prodigious creative ferment in Soviet Russia between 1920 and 1930 was halted even more dramatically in the fields of architecture and urbanism than it was in other areas; and those fertile years were followed by the years of sterility. What is the significance of this sterile outcome? Where can an architectural production be found today that might be described as ‘socialist’—or even as new when contrasted with the corresponding efforts of capitalist planning? 1 In
Recommended publications
  • Politics and History of 20Th Century Europe Shifted Radically, Swinging Like a Pendulum in a Dramatic Cause and Effect Relationship
    Politics and history of 20th Century Europe shifted radically, swinging like a pendulum in a dramatic cause and effect relationship. I explored the correlation between art movements and revolutions, focusing specifically on Russian Constructivism and the Russian Revolution in the 1920s, as well as the Punk movement in East Germany that instigated the Fall of the Berlin Wall. I am fascinated by the structural similarities of these movements, and their shared desire of egalitarianism, which progressed with the support of opposing political ideologies. I chose fashion design because it was at the forefront of both Constructivism and Punk, and because it is what I hope to pursue as a career. After designing a full collection in 2D, I wanted to challenge myself by bringing one of my garments to life. The top is a plaster cast cut in half and shaped with epoxy and a lace up mechanism so that it can be worn. A paste made of plaster and paper pulp serves to attach the pieces of metal and create a rough texture that produces the illusion of a concrete wall. For the skirt, I created 11 spheres of various sizes by layering and stitching together different shades of white, cream, off-white, grey, and beige colored fabrics, with barbed wire and hardware cloth, that I then stuffed with Polyfil. The piece is wearable, and meant to constrict one’s freedom of movement - just like the German Democratic Party constricted freedom of speech in East Germany. The bottom portion is meant to suffocate the body in a different approach, with huge, outlandish, forms like the ones admired by the Constructivists.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Commons and Urban Policy Among Real and Virtual Walls
    Vol.2 Vol.2no.1| no.22019 | 2019 MISCELLANEA Where Is Berlin? Cultural Commons and Urban Policy Among Real and Virtual Walls Chiara Carolina Donelli — University of Parma — [email protected] Michele Trimarchi — Magna Graecia University (Italy); University of Bologna (Italy) — [email protected] ABSTRACT “Poor but Sexy” is Berlin, in a well-known institutional slogan. The city has experienced a unique evolution since the end of World War II and the Cold War years, attracting creative talents who crafted a metropolitan and cosmopolitan network of fertile connections and exchanges. Berlin appears to be structured in micro-areas: kiez is the urban and social unit, a small commons where shared views and actions define the neighbourhood. Since the fall of the Wall, the Berlin community has lived in a multiple-layered town whose dynamics revealed many contradictions, due to the virtual walls and maps that end up opposing to the elabo- ration of a consistent metropolitan strategy. This article discusses the role of cultural com- mons in urban development, which does not fit a unique model or mechanism. An effective administrative action can encourage the diffusion and location of creative industries and cultural enterprises, generating a sustainable value chain for Berlin’s identity, based upon cultural commons. KEYWORDS Social Dynamics; Urban Strategies; Cultural Commons; Art System; Localisation. PEER REVIEWED https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/9126 ISSN 2612-0496 Copyright © 2019 Chiara Carolina Donelli, Michele Trimarchi 4.0 152 Donelli, Trimarchi Where is Berlin? 1 Cultural Commons within a complex urban texture Urban Commons in Berlin can be interpreted through the concept of kiez,1 the micro-framework defining the urban structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilmersdorf, Friedenau, Steglitz, Mariendorf Und Tempel- Liof
    download www.zobodat.at 190 Wilmersdorf, Friedenau, Steglitz, Mariendorf und Tempel- liof. Aufgestellt im Jahre 1903 von Stadtbaur. Gerlaoli. 1:5000. 129 X 84,5 cm. Farbdr. Schöneberg [1903]. (Berlin, H. Peters.) II. Geologie. Vom Kgl. Landesgeologen Prof. Dr. K. K oilkack-W ilm ersdorf (Berlin). Graebner, P. „Die Haide Norddeutschlands und die sich anschliessenden Formationen in biologischer Betrachtung.“ Eine Schilderung ihrer Vegetations - Verhältnisse, ihrer Existenzbedingungen und ihrer Beziehungen zu den übrigen Formationen, besonders zu Wald und Moor in Mittel­ europa. Mit einer Karte. Engl er & Drude, Die Vege­ tation der Erde. V. Leipzig (Wilh. Engelmann), 1901. Preis geb. 20 Mk. Milt her s, V. „Forelöbig Beretning om en geologisk Reise i det nordöstlige Tyskland og russik Polen.“ (Vor­ läufiger Bericht über eine geologische Reise im nordöst­ lichen Deutschland und Russisch-Polen.) Danmarks geol. Und., III Räkke, No. 3, 18 S., Kjöbenhavn, 1902. Hartz, N. „Interglaciale Afleiringer i Danmark og Nord- tyskland.“ (Interglaziale Bildungen in Dänemark und Norddeutschland.) Geogr. Ts., 16, S. 242—250, Kjöben­ havn, 1901—1902. Wahnschaffe, F. „Ueber die Auffindung der Paludinen- bank in dem Bohrloche Karolinenhöhe bei Spandau.“ Z. d. deutsch, geol. Ges., Bd. 54, 1902, P., S. 1 — 4. Oppenheim, P. „Noch einmal über die Tiefenzone des Septarienthones.“ Zentral bl. f. Min. etc., 1902, S. 468 bis 472. v. Lin stow, O. „Ueber Triasgeschiebe.“ Jb. d. k. pr. geol. L.-A. f. 1900, S. 200—210, mit einer Tafel, 8°, Berlin, 1901. Weber, C. A. „Versuch eines Ueberblicks über die Vege­ tation der Diluvialzeit in den mittleren Regionen Europas.“ Ann. geol. et min. de la Russie.
    [Show full text]
  • BENN-Britz Handlungskonzept Für Den Zeitraum Juli 2020
    BENN-Britz Handlungskonzept FÜR DEN ZEITRAUM JULI 2020 – DEZEMBER 2021 STEPHANUS STIFTUNG, BENN BRITZ | HANNE NÜTE 1, 12359 BERLIN | BENN [email protected] | 030 6260 8614 Stephanus-Stiftung und Tochtergesellschaften Geschäftsbereich Migration und Integration Julia Morais, Leitung Albertinenstr. 20, 13086 Berlin Nachbarschaftsbüro BENN-Britz Hanne Nüte 1 12359 Berlin Tel.: 030 62608614 • 030 62608868 E-Mail: [email protected] www.benn-britz.de Team BENN-Britz Susen Engel, Leitung Tel. 0151 18887901 Luca Gefäller, Projektmanagement Tel. 0151 40664748 Dr. Lina Sánchez Steiner, Projektmanagement Stand: 29.06.2020 1 Inhalt Einleitung ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Aktuelle Situation ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Kurzanalyse des Aktionsraums Britz ........................................................................................ 4 1.2 Nachbarschaft und Soziale Infrastrukturen im Aktionsraum Britz .......................................... 5 1.3 Rückblick und aktuelle Bedarfe im Aktionsraum Britz ............................................................ 6 2. Handlungsbedarfe und Ziele ......................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Corona ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merger Agreement Between Linde Intermediate Holding
    Notarial deed by Notary Dr. Tilman Götte, Munich, as of November 1, 2018 - UR 2924 G/2018 Convenience Translation MERGER AGREEMENT BETWEEN LINDE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING AG AND LINDE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Merger Agreement between Linde Intermediate Holding AG, Klosterhofstraße 1, 80331 Munich, – hereinafter also referred to as “Linde Intermediate” or the “Acquiring Company” – and Linde Aktiengesellschaft, Klosterhofstraße 1, 80331 Munich, - hereinafter also referred to as “Linde AG” or the “Transferring Company” – Acquiring Company and Transferring Company also referred to as “Parties” or individually referred to as a “Party” – - 2 - Preliminary Remarks I. Linde Intermediate is a stock corporation, incorporated under the laws of Germany and registered with the commercial register of the local court of Munich under HRB 234880, having its registered office in Munich, whose shares are neither admitted to trading on the regulated market segments of a stock exchange nor traded on an over-the-counter market of a stock exchange. The nominal capital of Linde Intermediate registered with the commercial register amounts to € 50,000. It is divided into 50,000 registered shares with no par value each having a notional value of € 1.00. The fiscal year of Linde Intermediate is the calendar year. The sole shareholder of Linde Intermediate is Linde Holding GmbH, registered with the commercial register of the local court of Munich under HRB 234787, having its registered office in Munich (“Linde Holding GmbH”). The nominal capital of Linde Holding GmbH is, in turn, fully held by Linde plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland, having its registered office in Dublin, Ireland, and its principal executive offices in Surrey, United Kingdom (“Linde plc”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno Tauts Hufeisensiedlung Und Das UNESCO-Welterbe „Siedlungen Der Berliner Moderne“
    PRESSEEINLADUNG ZUR BUCHPRÄSENTATION Bruno Tauts Hufeisensiedlung und das UNESCO-Welterbe „Siedlungen der Berliner Moderne“ Termin: Mittwoch, den 5. Oktober 2016, 19.00 – 20.30 Uhr Ort: Buchhandlung Bücherbogen am Savignyplatz, Berlin-Charlottenburg Veranstalter: Ben Buschfeld/buschfeld.com, Deutscher Werkbund Berlin, Bücherbogen ZUM THEMA: Mit seinen Wohnsiedlungen setzte der Visionär, Architekt und Stadtplaner Bruno Taut (1880–1938) zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts Maßstäbe. Vor allem das 1925–1930 errichtete Denkmalensemble Hufeisensiedlung in Berlin-Britz wird international als Schlüsselwerk des reformorientierten Wohnungsbaus gewürdigt. Die sehr farbenfroh, variantenreich und mit vielen Gärten und Freiflächen gestaltete denkmalgeschützte Siedlung gruppiert sich um eine 350 Meter lange, in Form eines DE • EN Hufeisens erbaute Gebäudeformation. Das knapp 2.000 gut geschnittene Wohneinheiten BRUNO TAUTs umfassende Ensemble folgte damals dem populären Leitbild „Licht, Luft und Sonne BEN BUSCHFELD für alle“ und zeigt, wie ab 1920 im Zuge des Zusammenschlusses der Region zu „Groß- Berlin“ neue durchgrünte Stadtquartiere entstehen konnten. Hierbei avancierte der auf Bruno Taut zurückgehende Teil der Großsiedlung Britz bereits früh zu einer Ikone des „Neuen Bauens“. Bis heute gilt die Anlage als die bekannteste der sechs, 2008 zum UNESCO-Welterbe erklärten, „Siedlungen der Berliner Moderne“. Die seinerzeit von einer städtischen Gesellschaft errichtete, seit 1998 privatisierte Siedlung ist aber auch aus einem aktuellen Blickwinkel ein interessantes
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract: Datenbank Hufeisensiedlung
    30. Berliner Denkmaltag am 15. April 2016 Denkmal digital. Dokumentieren – Kommunizieren – Mobilisieren“ Technische Universität Berlin, Architekturgebäude, Raum A053 Ben Buschfeld, Dipl. Designer Abstract: Datenbank Hufeisensiedlung Die von dem Architekten Bruno Taut, Stadtbaurat Martin Wagner und dem Gartenarchitekten Leberecht Migge gestaltete, zwischen 1925 und 1930 von der GEHAG errichtete Hufeisensiedlung in Neukölln-Britz gilt international als Schlüsselwerk modernen städtischen Siedlungsbaus. Sie umfasst knapp 2.000 Wohneinheiten und steht seit 1986 als Gesamtensemble unter Denkmalschutz. Im Juli 2008 wurde sie, gemeinsam mit fünf weiteren Siedlungen der Berliner Moderne, in die UNESCO-Welterbeliste aufgenommen, seit 2010 ist sie zusätzlich eingetragenes Gartendenkmal. Der 1998 erfolgte Verkauf der städtischen Wohnungsbaugesellschaft GEHAG mündete in verschiedenen Übernahmen deren umfangreichen Gebäude-Portfolios am Finanzmarkt. Er befindet sich heute im Eigentum der Deutsche Wohnen AG, die damit ein Großteil der Berliner Welterbesiedlungen besitzt und – speziell in der Hufeisensiedlung – seit 2000/2001 begann, die Reihenhausbestände sukzessive als Einzeleigentum zu verkaufen. Diese Situation bringt eine Zersplitterung der Eigentumsverhältnisse in dem von Taut sehr virtuos und detailreich variierten Denkmalensemble mit sich und erschwert dessen denkmalgerechten Erhalt. Die 679, je mit einem Garten versehenen, Reihenhäuser befinden sich heute fast komplett in Einzeleigentum. Dies bedeutet, dass mehrere Hundert private, nicht fachlich
    [Show full text]
  • Circling Opera in Berlin by Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College
    Circling Opera in Berlin By Paul Martin Chaikin B.A., Grinnell College, 2001 A.M., Brown University, 2004 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in the Department of Music at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 This dissertation by Paul Martin Chaikin is accepted in its present form by the Department of Music as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_______________ _________________________________ Rose Rosengard Subotnik, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Jeff Todd Titon, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Philip Rosen, Reader Date_______________ __________________________________ Dana Gooley, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_______________ _________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Deutsche Akademische Austauch Dienst (DAAD) for funding my fieldwork in Berlin. I am also grateful to the Institut für Musikwissenschaft und Medienwissenschaft at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin for providing me with an academic affiliation in Germany, and to Prof. Dr. Christian Kaden for sponsoring my research proposal. I am deeply indebted to the Deutsche Staatsoper Unter den Linden for welcoming me into the administrative thicket that sustains operatic culture in Berlin. I am especially grateful to Francis Hüsers, the company’s director of artistic affairs and chief dramaturg, and to Ilse Ungeheuer, the former coordinator of the dramaturgy department. I would also like to thank Ronny Unganz and Sabine Turner for leading me to secret caches of quantitative data. Throughout this entire ordeal, Rose Rosengard Subotnik has been a superlative academic advisor and a thoughtful mentor; my gratitude to her is beyond measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Krajobrazy Z Murem Berlińskim W Filmach Fabularnych Podzielonego Kina Do Roku 1989
    Title: Krajobrazy z murem berlińskim w filmach fabularnych podzielonego kina do roku 1989 Author: Andrzej Gwóźdź Citation style: Gwóźdź Andrzej. (2017). Krajobrazy z murem berlińskim w filmach fabularnych podzielonego kina do roku 1989. W: B. Kita, M. Kempna-Pieniążek (red.), "Filmowe pejzaże Europy" (S. 77-105). Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Andrzej Gwóźdź Krajobrazy z murem berlińskim w filmach fabularnych podzielonego kina do roku 1989 Ostateczny podział Berlina, zapoczątkowany budową muru w nocy z 12 na 13 sierpnia 1961 roku, nie stanowił cezury historycznofilmowej. Nawet fakt, że jedyna NRD-owska wytwórnia filmów fabularnych Defa, ulokowana tuż przy murze w dzielnicy Poczdamu Babelsberg, została na- gle odcięta od bezpośredniej komunikacji ze stolicą NRD, niewiele w isto- cie na razie zmieniał – poza tym, że dramatycznie wydłużał czas dojazdu filmowców do pracy z samego Berlina Wschodniego, bo trzeba było ob- jechać Berlin Zachodni, by dostać się przed bramę wytwórni. Wprawdzie wymieniono dyrektora generalnego wytwórni (Alberta Wilkeninga zastą- pił Joachim Mückenberger, który piastował tę funkcję do czystki po 11. Plenum KC SED w grudniu 1965 roku), ale na pozytywne efekty tej zmiany przyjdzie jeszcze poczekać. Pracownicy Defy, jak wymagała tego potrzeba chwili, w pamiętną noc i później sami z bronią w ręku uczestniczyli w „za- bezpieczaniu granicy państwowej NRD”, biorąc czynny udział w oddzia- łach bojowych rozlokowanych wokół leżącego nieopodal kanału Teltow1. Na wschodzie i zachodzie Niemiec – w Niemieckiej Republice De- mokratycznej i Republice Federalnej Niemiec – a także w czterech sek- torach Berlina dalej powstawały filmy typowe dla antagonistycznych struktur państwowych, politycznych i społecznych powojennych Nie- miec. Żywa jednak była w NRD wiara w zelżenie restrykcji ideologicz- 1 Wśród 62 filmowców strzegących granicy był także czołowy reżyser Defy Konrad Wolf, którego „wyznanie wiary” wydrukował już 15 sierpnia 1961 roku par- tyjny dziennik „Neues Deutschland”.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufactured Proletariat: Constructivism and the Stalinist Company Town
    86'rH ACSA ANNUAL MEETING AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 655 Manufactured Proletariat: Constructivism and the Stalinist Company Town GREG CASTILLO University of California, Berkeley A procession of clashing architectural styles documents the "From the Constructivists to the World."' El Lissitzky, who USSR's attempt to devise the environment for a socialist helped found Switzerland's Constructivist architectural asso- "new man." Of these, Constructivism is conventionally seen ciation (but declined to join its Soviet equivalent), declared as an emblem of the Great Utopia, a vision of this project the factory "the crucible of socialization for the urban popu- predating its totalitarian metamorphosis. But, for areputation lation" and "the university for the new Socialist man."J as the antithesis of "Stalinist" architecture, Constructivism's Constructivists venerated machine environments for their timing is problematic, to say the least. Constructivism came ordained capacity to transform human nature. Aleksandr into its own during the First Five-Year Plan (1928-32), an era Vesnin praisedengineering's invention of "objects of genius" that witnessed the rise of Stalin's "cult of personality" and his and called for artists to create devices equal in the "potential campaigns to collectivize agriculture and industrialize at energy of their psycho-physiological influence on the con- breakneck speed. This period, marked by the emergence of sciousness of the indi~idual."~The factory was considered the Stalinist state, corresponds to the building of the most potent specimen of the "social condenser" - building Constructivism's canonic monuments.' types that, while fulfilling basic social needs, instilled social- In servicing the First Five-Year Plan, Constructivist archi- ist modes of behavior and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt0m64w57q.Pdf
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Ideologies of Pure Abstraction Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0m64w57q Author Kim, Amy Chun Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Ideologies of Pure Abstraction By Amy Chun Kim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Whitney Davis, Chair Professor Todd Olson Professor Robert Kaufman Spring 2015 Ideologies of Pure Abstraction © 2015 Amy Chun Kim Abstract Ideologies of Pure Abstraction by Amy Chun Kim Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art University of California, Berkeley Professor Whitney Davis, Chair This dissertation presents a history of the development of abstract art in the 1920s and 1930s, the period of its expansion and consolidation as an identifiable movement and practice of art. I argue that the emergence of the category of abstract art in the 1920s is grounded in a voluntaristic impulse to remake the world. I argue that the consolidation of abstract art as a movement emerged out of the Parisian reception of a new Soviet art practice that contained a political impetus that was subsequently obscured as this moment passed. The occultation of this historical context laid the groundwork for the postwar “multiplication” of the meanings of abstraction, and the later tendency to associate its early programmatic aspirations with a more apolitical mysticism. Abstraction has a long and varied history as both a conceptual-aesthetic practice and as an ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Gartenstadt Staaken Als Prototyp Der Modernen Deutschen Siedlung
    Karl Kiem Die Gartenstadt Staaken als Prototyp der modernen deutschen Siedlung Bekannt ist über die Gartenstadt Staaken bisher im Wesentlichen nur das konkret Faktische, soweit sich dieses aus der Sekundärliteratur (1) erschließen läßt: Die Siedlung wurde 1914-1917 zur Wohnungsversorgung der Beschäftigten der staatlichen Munitionsfabriken in Spandau gebaut. Das Reichsamt des Inneren (Innenministerium) kaufte 1913 das Grundstück, ließ eine Genossenschaft gründen und bestellte den Architekten Paul Schmitthenner (1884-1972). Von den von ihm geplanten 1000 Wohnungen wurden etwa vier Fünftel fertiggestellt. Auch ein Kaufhaus und zwei Schulen entstanden nach seinem Entwurf. Paul Schmitthenner, Gartenstadt Staaken, 1914-17, Lageplan Werden in der baugeschichtlichen Literatur die Fakten mehr oder weniger genau referiert, so läßt die konkretisierte Beschränkung das tatsächliche Geschehen an den entscheidenden Stellen im Dunkeln. Sucht man nach der eigentlichen Triebfeder zum Bau der Gartenstadt Staaken, so erscheint die Wohnungsversorgung der Spandauer Munitionsarbeiter sekundär. In erster Linie ging es nämlich hier darum, daß der Staat eine Mustersiedlung bauen wollte, bei der neben dem architektonischen und städtebaulichen Vorbild auch Baunormen, Finanzierungsmodelle und Organisationsformen entwickelt und festgeschrieben werden sollten.(2) Gehen wir der damals ungewöhnlichen staatlichen Initiative auf den Grund, so finden wir ein Bündel von Einflußfaktoren, die auf die fortschrittlichsten Bewegungen der Zeit zurückzuführen sind. Der politische Druck kommt vor allem von der Sozialdemokratie. Aber auch die Stadtplaner und Architekten kämpfen für ihre Überzeugungen. Die gestalterische Avantgarde hat im Deutschen Werkbund ein wichtiges Sprachrohr. Und der Architekt Hermann Muthesius (1861-1927) weiß diesem an höchster Stelle Gehör zu verschaffen. Anregend für den modernen deutschen Siedlungsbau sind die gartenstädtischen Wohnanlagen in England, wie Port Sunlight (ab 1892), Bourneville (ab 1895) und Hampstead (ab 1903).
    [Show full text]