MADAGASCAR United Nations Development Programme Independent Evaluation Office

ANNEXES INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION - MADAGASCAR United Nations Development Programme Independent Evaluation Office

Contents Annex 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ...... 1 Annex 2: COUNTRY OVERVIEW ...... 10 Annex 3: COUNTRY OFFICE OVERVIEW ...... 12 Annex 4: PROJECT LIST ...... 15 Annex 5: CPD RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND STATUS OF INDICATORS ...... 18 Annex 6: PERSONS CONSULTED ...... 20 Annex 7: DOCUMENTS CONSULTED ...... 28

Annex 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE

I. Introduction The Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) conducts independent country programme evaluations (ICPEs), previously called “Assessment of Development Results) (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level, as well as the effectiveness of UNDP’s strategy in facilitating and leveraging national efforts for achieving development results. The purpose of an ICPE is to:

- Support the development of the next UNDP Country Programme Document - Strengthen accountability of UNDP to national stakeholders - Strengthen accountability of UNDP to the Executive Board ICPEs are independent evaluations carried out within the overall provisions contained in the UNDP Evaluation Policy.1 The IEO is independent of UNDP management and is headed by a Director who reports to the UNDP Executive Board. The responsibility of IEO is two-fold: (i) provide the Executive Board with valid and credible information from evaluations for corporate accountability, decision-making and improvement; and (ii) enhance the independence, credibility and utility of the evaluation function and its coherence, harmonization and alignment in support of United Nations reform and national ownership. Based on the principle of national ownership, IEO seeks to conduct ICPEs in collaboration with the national authorities where the country programme is implemented.

This is the first ICPE for Madagascar, and will be conducted in 2018 towards the end of the current UNDP programme cycle of 2015-2019, with a view to contributing to the preparation of UNDP’s new programme starting from 2020. The ICPE will be conducted in close collaboration with the Government of Madagascar, UNDP Madagascar country office, and UNDP Regional Bureau for Africa.

II. National context Madagascar is a large island nation located in the Indian Ocean, off the coast of east Africa. It is the world’s fourth largest island, and has an estimated population of 24.89 million.2 Despite having many natural assets and economic potential, the country has experienced a series of crises, the latest and longest of which was from 2009 to 2013, which has negatively affected its economic growth. In 2012, only 30% of Malagasy lived above the national poverty line and only 10% above the international poverty line.3 The return to constitutional order following successful presidential and legislative elections in 2013 has put the country back on a positive development path. However, weak governance at all level remains a challenge, with corruption being a serious impediment to development and only 58% of the population enjoying access to justice.4 With a score of 26/100 on the Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index in 2016, Madagascar ranks 145th out of 176 countries.5 Decentralization efforts have also

1 http://web.undp.org/evaluation/documents/evaluation-policy.pdf. 2 United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects (2016) 3 World Bank, Country Partnership Framework for the Republic of Madagascar for the period FY17-FY21, data drawn from the ENSOMD 2012 survey. 4 CPD 2015-2019, page 2, 3. 5 https://www.transparency.org/country/MDG#

1 not yielded the expected results due to the lack of an agreed national vision and adequate implementation capacities.6

Since 2014, the country has slowly been recovering from the economic crisis and political instability. GDP growth was 4.2% in 2016, up from -4.0% in 2009 and 2.3% in 2013. Madagascar’s Human Development Index value for 2015 was 0.512, putting the country in the low human development category, positioning it at 158 out of 188 countries and territories.7 Key challenges which the country faces include, among others, high poverty, high hunger (33% of the population lived below the minimum level of dietary energy consumption in 2015), low coverage of drinking water and sanitation (only 51.5% and 12% of population had access to improved drinking water sources and sanitation facility respectively in 2015), and high maternal mortality ratio. 8 Despite generally low unemployment rates (1.3% of the labour force), underemployment is a serious problem affecting 80% of the population.9

Madagascar is a disaster-prone country, and extreme weather events have affected the well-being of the population, particularly the poorest. Common natural disasters, to which the country is increasingly vulnerable due to climate change, include cyclones, locust infestation, flooding and droughts. Madagascar’s abundant of natural resources have suffered from the rapid growth of a trafficking economy around precious woods, gold and stones, cattle, and its rich biodiversity, leading to increasing tensions around the capture of natural resources rents.10

The Government of Madagascar demonstrated its commitment to address its development challenges through the National Development Plan 2015-2019, which includes 5 strategic areas: (i) governance, rule of law, security, decentralization, democracy and national solidarity; (ii) preserving macroeconomic stability and supporting development; (iii) inclusive growth and local roots of development; (iv) adequate human capital for the development process; and (v) valorisation of natural capital and strengthening resilience to natural disasters.

III. UNDP Programme in Madagascar The UNDP country programme in Madagascar for the period 2015-2019 focuses on two outcomes, in the areas of governance and sustainable development, with resilience running through both. The country programme is expected to contribute to the attainment of the first two outcomes of the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), which have a significant governance dimension.

The governance component is built around two pillars: (i) local governance, peace building and national reconciliation; and (ii) rule of law and access to justice with a focus on the penal system and political governance, which includes support to key institutions such as the parliament, the electoral administration and the anticorruption bodies.

In the sustainable development component, UNDP planned to support initiatives aimed at creating employment and income-generating activities benefiting women, youth and vulnerable populations. UNDP also planned to support initiatives aimed at reducing and recovering from the impact of natural disasters through national and local institutional capacity building, analysis and incorporation of risk-

6 CPD 2015-2019, page 3. 7 http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/MDG.pdf 8 http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/Progress2015/Snapshots/MDG.pdf 9 CPD 2015-2019, page 2. 10 World Bank, Country Partnership Framework for the Republic of Madagascar for the period FY17-FY21, page 3.

2 reduction measures and post-disaster recovery initiatives in national and local development plans. UNDP also intended to emphasize improving environmental governance and reconciling natural resource management with development challenges at the regional and community levels.

UNDAF outcomes, UNDP programme outputs and indicative resources are summarized in the following table:

Table 1: UNDAF outcomes, UNDP programme outputs and indicative resources (2015-2019) Indicative resources (US$ millions) UNDAF outcomes and UNDP country programme outputs Regular Other resources resources Outcome 1 Public Output 1: Decentralized entities, civil institutions, civil society and society and grassroots communities in media, at central and targeted areas are structured and decentralized level, carry equipped to foster social cohesion, peace, 11.5 2 out their roles and are security, effective recovery, resist external accountable contributing to shocks and boost local development, peaceful governance that responding to the needs expressed by the protects human rights population. Output 2: Democratic institutions and stakeholders responsible for accountability and the rule of law have clear mandate, appropriate resources and the capacity to carry out their functions in 8.537 8 an efficient and transparent manner enabling them to facilitate access to justice, the fight against corruption, and citizen participation Total Outcome 1 20.037 10 Outcome 2 - Vulnerable Output 3: Institutions and stakeholders at population groups in national and local level use tools and targeted areas access mechanisms that facilitate the 7 0 income and employment achievement of the MDGs/SDGs and more opportunities, thus effective use of development aid enhancing resilience and Output 4: Structural transformation, contributing to inclusive building sustainable production capacity and equitable growth and good environmental governance are which in turn fosters effective and foster the creation of 19.2 17 sustainable development employment and livelihood protection for vulnerable groups, women and young people Total Outcome 2 26.2 17 Grand total 73.237 Source: UNDP Madagascar Country Programme Document 2015-2019

IV. Scope of the evaluation

ICPEs are conducted in the penultimate year of the ongoing UNDP country programme in order to feed into the process of developing the new country programme. The ICPE will focus on the present programme cycle (2015-2019) while taking into account interventions which may have started in the previous programme cycle (2008-2011/2014) but continued for a few more years into the current programme cycle.

As a country-level evaluation of UNDP, the ICPE will focus on the formal UNDP country programme approved by the Executive Board, but will also consider any changes from the initial CPD during the period under review. The ICPE covers interventions funded by all sources of finance, core UNDP resources, donor funds, government funds, etc. It is important to note that a UNDP country office may be involved in a number of activities that may not be included in a specific project. Some of these “non-project” activities may be crucial for advancing the political and social agenda of a country.

Special efforts will be made to capture the role and contribution of UNV and UNCDF through undertaking joint work with UNDP. This information will be used for synthesis in order to provide corporate level evaluative evidence of performance of the associated fund and programme.

V. Methodology The evaluation methodology will adhere to the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms & Standards.11 The ICPE will address the following three evaluation questions.12 These questions will also guide the presentation of the evaluation findings in the report.

1. What did the UNDP country programme intend to achieve during the period under review? 2. To what extent has the programme achieved (or is likely to achieve) its intended objectives? 3. What factors contributed to or hindered UNDP’s performance and eventually, to the sustainability of results? To address question 1, a Theory of Change (ToC) approach will be used in consultation with stakeholders, as appropriate, to better understand how and under what conditions UNDP’s interventions are expected to lead to good governance and sustainable development in the country. Discussions of the ToC will focus on mapping the assumptions behind the programme’s desired change(s) and the causal linkages between the intervention(s) and the intended country programme outcomes.

As part of this analysis, the progression of the programme over the review period will also be examined. In assessing the CPD’s progression, UNDP’s capacity to adapt to the changing context in Madagascar and respond to national development needs and priorities will also be looked at.

The effectiveness of UNDP’s country programme will be analyzed in response to evaluation question 2. This will include an assessment of the achieved results and the extent to which these results have contributed to the intended CPD objectives. In this process, both positive and negative, direct and indirect as well as unintended results will be identified.

To better understand UNDP’s performance, the specific factors that influenced - positively or negatively - UNDP’s performance and eventually, the sustainability of results in the country will be examined in

11 http://www.uneval.org/document/detail/21 12 The ICPEs have adopted a streamlined methodology, which differs from the previous ADRs that were structured according to the four standard OECD DAC criteria.

4 response to evaluation question 3. In addition to country-specific factors that may explain UNDP’s performance, the utilization of resources to deliver results (including managerial practices), the extent to which the CO fostered partnerships and synergies with other actors (including through south-south and triangular cooperation), and the integration of gender equality and women’s empowerment in design and implementation of the CPD are some of the aspects that will be assessed under this question.

VI. Data collection

Assessment of existing data and data collection constraints. An assessment was carried out for each outcome area to ascertain the available information, identify data constraints, to determine the data collection needs and methods. The assessment outlined the level of evaluable data that is available. The assessment indicated that there were 6 decentralized evaluations undertaken during the period from 2015 to present, out of which one was the UNDAF mid-term review, one was the CPD mid-term review and the 4 others were project evaluations. All these evaluations will serve as important inputs into the ICPE. With respect to indicators, the CPD and CPAP list 8 indicators for the 2 outcome results, and 10 indicators to measure the 4 outputs, with baseline and targets. To the extent possible, the ICPE will seek to use these indicators to better understand the intention of the UNDP programme and to measure or assess progress towards the outcomes. Several indicators for CPD results did not include sources of data, while others indicated national statistics and/or project annual reports as data sources. The evaluation’s ability to measure progress against these indicators will therefore depend in part on the country office’s monitoring and national statistical capacities. The National Development Plan for 2015-2019 includes measures for monitoring and evaluation of national development indicators, which may constitute inputs for the ICPE. The General Housing and Population Census (RGPH 3) was planned to take place during 2017, and could also provide further data for the evaluation.

It is also important to note that UNDP projects that contributed to different outcomes are at different stages of implementation, and therefore it may not always be possible to determine the projects’ contribution to results. In cases where the projects/initiatives are still in their initial stages, the evaluation will document observable progress and seek to ascertain the possibility of achieving the outcome given the programme design and measures already put in place.

Initial discussions with the country office revealed no limitations to the evaluation team’s ability to travel to project sites located in different parts of the country.

Data collection methods: The evaluation will use data from primary and secondary sources, including desk review of documentation and information and interviews with key informants, including beneficiaries, partners and managers. An advance questionnaire will be administered to the country office before the data collection mission in the country. A multi-stakeholder approach will be followed and interviews will include government representatives, civil-society organizations, private-sector representatives, UN agencies, multilateral organizations, bilateral donors, and beneficiaries of the programme. Focus group discussions will be used to consult some groups of beneficiaries as appropriate.

The evaluation team will also undertake field visits to selected project sites to observe the projects first- hand. It is expected that regions where UNDP has a concentration of field projects (in more than one outcome area), as well as those where critical projects are being implemented will be considered. There should be a coverage of both outcome areas. The coverage should include a sample, as relevant, of both

5 successful projects and projects reporting difficulties where lessons can be learned, both larger and smaller pilot projects, as well as both completed and active projects.

The IEO and the country office have identified an initial list of background and programme-related documents which is posted on an ICPE SharePoint website. The following secondary data will be reviewed, among others: background documents on the national context, documents prepared by international partners during the period under review and documents prepared by UN system agencies; programme plans and frameworks; progress reports; monitoring self-assessments such as the yearly UNDP Results Oriented Annual Reports; and evaluations conducted by the country office and partners.

In line with UNDP’s gender mainstreaming strategy, the ICPE will examine the level of gender mainstreaming across all of UNDP Madagascar programmes and operations. Gender disaggregated data will be collected, where available, and assessed against its programme outcomes.

Validation. The evaluation will use triangulation of information collected from different sources and/or by different methods to ensure that the data is valid.

Stakeholder involvement: A participatory and transparent process will be followed to engage with multiple stakeholders at all stages of the evaluation process. During the initial phase a stakeholder analysis will be conducted to identify all relevant UNDP partners, including those that may have not worked with UNDP but play a key role in the outcomes to which UNDP contributes. This stakeholder analysis will serve to identify key informants for interviews during the main data collection phase of the evaluation, and to examine any potential partnerships that could further improve UNDP’s contribution to the country.

VII. Management arrangements Independent Evaluation Office of UNDP: The UNDP IEO will conduct the ICPE in consultation with the UNDP Madagascar Country Office, the Regional Bureau for Africa and the Government of Madagascar. The IEO Lead Evaluator will lead the evaluation and coordinate the evaluation team. The IEO will meet all costs directly related to the conduct of the ICPE.

UNDP Country Office in Madagascar: The country office will support the evaluation team to liaise with key partners and other stakeholders and ensure that all necessary information regarding UNDP’s programmes, projects and activities in the country is available to the team, and provide factual verifications of the draft report on a timely basis. The country office will provide the evaluation team in- kind organizational support (e.g. arranging meetings with project staff, stakeholders, beneficiaries; assistance for project site visits). To ensure the independence of the views expressed, country office staff will not participate in interviews and meetings with stakeholders held for data collection purposes. The country office will jointly organize the final stakeholder meeting, ensuring participation of key government counterparts, through a video-conference with the IEO, where findings and results of the evaluation will be presented. Additionally, the country office will support the use and dissemination of the final outputs of the ICPE process.

UNDP Regional Bureau for Africa (RBA): RBA will support the evaluation through information sharing, and will also participate in discussions on emerging conclusions and recommendations.

Evaluation Team: The IEO will constitute an evaluation team to undertake the ICPE. The IEO will ensure gender balance in the team which will include the following members:

• Lead Evaluator (LE): IEO staff member with overall responsibility for managing the ICPE, including preparing for and designing the evaluation (i.e. the present ToR) as well as selecting the evaluation team and providing methodological guidance. The LE will be responsible for the synthesis process and the preparation of the draft and final evaluation reports. The LE will be backstopped by a senior evaluator also from the IEO. • Associate Evaluator (AE): The AE will support the LE in the preparation and design of the evaluation, including background research and documentation, the selection of the evaluation team, and the synthesis process. The AE will review the draft report and support the LE in other aspects of the ICPE process as may be required. • Consultants: 2 consultants will be recruited and will be responsible for the outcome areas. Under the guidance of LE, they will conduct preliminary research and data collection activities, prepare outcome analysis, and contribute to the preparation of the final ICPE report. The roles of the different members of the evaluation team can be summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Data collection responsibilities by outcome areas

Outcome Report Data collection Governance Consultant Consultant Sustainable development Consultant Consultant General strategic and management LE LE/AE/consultant issues

VIII. Evaluation Process The evaluation will be conducted according to the approved IEO process. The following represents a summary of the five key phases of the process, which constitute the framework for conducting the evaluation.

Phase 1: Preparatory work. The IEO prepares the ToR and the evaluation design, including an overall evaluation matrix. Once the TOR is approved, additional evaluation team members, comprising international and/or national development professionals will be recruited. The IEO starts collecting data and documentation internally first and then filling data gaps with help from the UNDP country office.

Additional evaluation team members, comprising development professionals, will be recruited once the ToR is complete.

Phase 2: Desk analysis. Evaluation team members will conduct desk review of reference material, and identify specific evaluation questions, and issues. Further in-depth data collection will be conducted, by administering an advance questionnaire and interviews (via phone, Skype, etc.) with key stakeholders, including country office staff. Based on this, detailed evaluation questions, gaps and issues that require validation during the field-based phase of the data collection will be identified.

Phase 3: Field-based data collection. During this phase, the evaluation team undertakes a mission to the country to engage in data collection activities. The estimated duration of the mission is around 3 weeks. The evaluation team will liaise with CO staff and management, key government stakeholders and other partners and beneficiaries. At the end of the mission, the evaluation team will hold a debrief presentation of the key preliminary findings at the country office. Efforts will be made to coordinate the timing of the

7 evaluation mission with the audit mission by the Office of Audit and Investigation, planned to take place in the period 12-23 March 2018. Overlapping the evaluation and audit missions to have some joint meetings in the country will facilitate sharing of information, minimizing any duplication in data collection efforts between IEO and OAI, thus enhancing the efficiency of both exercises.

Phase 4: Analysis, report writing, quality review and debrief. Based on the analysis of data collected and triangulated, the LE will undertake a synthesis process to write the ICPE report. The draft will first be subject to peer review by IEO and its International Evaluation Advisory Panel. Once the draft is quality cleared, it will be circulated to the country office and the UNDP Regional Bureau for Africa for factual corrections. The second draft, which takes into account any factual corrections, will be shared with national stakeholders for further comments. Any necessary additional corrections will be made and the UNDP Madagascar country office will prepare the management response to the ICPE, under the overall oversight of the regional bureau.

The report will then be shared at a final debriefing where the results of the evaluation are presented to key national stakeholders. The way forward will be discussed with a view to creating greater ownership by national stakeholders with respect to the recommendations as well as to strengthening accountability of UNDP to national stakeholders. Taking into account the discussion at the stakeholder event, the evaluation report will be finalized and published.

Phase 5: Publication and dissemination. The ICPE report will be written in English. It will follow the standard IEO publication guidelines. A French version of the report will be produced, as needed and requested by the CO. The ICPE report will be widely distributed in both hard and electronic versions. The evaluation report will be made available to UNDP Executive Board by the time of approving a new Country Programme Document. It will be widely distributed by the IEO within UNDP as well as to the evaluation units of other international organisations, evaluation societies/networks and research institutions in the region. The Madagascar country office and the Government of Madagascar will disseminate to stakeholders in the country. The report and the management response will be published on the UNDP website13 as well as in the Evaluation Resource Centre. The Regional Bureau for Africa will be responsible for monitoring and overseeing the implementation of follow-up actions in the Evaluation Resource Centre.14

IX. Timeframe for the ICPE Process The timeframe and responsibilities for the evaluation process are tentatively15 as follows in Table 3:

Table 3: Tentative timeframe for the ICPE process going to the Board in June 2019 Activity Responsible party Proposed timeframe Phase 1: Preparatory work TOR completed and approved by IEO Director LE January 2018 Selection of consultant team members LE January – early February 2018 Phase 2: Desk analysis Preliminary desk review of reference material Evaluation team February 2018

13 web.undp.org/evaluation 14 erc.undp.org 15 The timeframe, indicative of process and deadlines, does not imply full-time engagement of evaluation team during the period.

Advance questionnaires to the CO LE/AE/CO February 2018 Phase 3: Field-based data collection Mission to Madagascar LE/AE/Consultants 12-30 March 2018 Phase 4: Analysis, report writing, quality review and debrief Analysis of data and submission of background Consultants April 2018 papers Synthesis and report writing LE/AE May-June 218 Zero draft for internal IOE clearance/IEAP comments LE July 2018 First draft to CO/RBA for comments LE/CO/RBA August 2018 Second draft shared with the government and LE/CO/GOV September 2018 national stakeholders Draft management response CO September 2018 Stakeholder workshop via video-conference IEO/CO/RBA October 2018 Phase 5: Publication and dissemination Editing and formatting IEO October 2018 Final report and evaluation brief IEO October 2018 Dissemination of the final report IEO October 2018

Annex 2: COUNTRY OVERVIEW

GDP growth GDP per capita PPP (constant 2011 international dollar) 8% $1,600

6% $1,400

4% $1,200 $1,000 2% $800 0% $600 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $400 -2% $200 -4% $0 -6% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Official Development Assistance Disbursements (2001-2016) Millions USD

International Development Association [IDA] $2,201.5 France $1,757.4 EU Institutions $1,499.3 United States $1,112.0 African Development Bank, Total $562.1 Japan $421.2 Global Fund $302.2 Germany $265.9 IMF (Concessional Trust Funds) $247.9 Spain $186.9 Norway $181.1 UNICEF $151.6 Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization [GAVI] $148.8 Italy $128.9 Switzerland $116.7 UNDP $111.8

Net ODA recieved Net ODA recieved constant 2015 USD in millions % of GNI $1,400 35%

$1,200 30%

$1,000 25%

$800 20%

$600 15%

$400 10%

$200 5%

$0 0% 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 201610 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016

HDI trends, 2010-2017 0.56

0.54 Sub-Saharan Africa

0.52 Madagascar

Low human 0.5 development

0.48

0.46

0.44

0.42 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Poverty rates Poverty rates % of the population (2012) % of the population

77.3% Global 71.5% 90% Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) 80%

48.5% 70% Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of population) 60%

50%

40%

30%

20% Rural Urban 2001 2010 2012

Annex 3: COUNTRY OFFICE OVERVIEW

Sources for all visualisations below, unless otherwise indicated, are Atlas extractions.

Outcome 28: Jobs and sustainable growth Outcome 29: Governance

Millions

$7 Budget Expenditure $6.9 $6

$5.7 $5 $5.6 $5.4

$4.7 $4 $4.5

$0 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

Execution Rate by Year Evolution of Programme Budget & Expenditure Millions Total Budget $14 100% Total Expenditure 90% $12 $13.2 80% 70% $10 $10.9 $10.7

60% $8 50% 40% $6

30% $4 20% $2 10%

0% $0 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

Total Expenditure by Fund Category and Year Millions $12.5 $10.2 $10.1 Total

$1.2 $1.3 $1.6 Vertical Trust Funds

Regular Resources $8.5 $8.5 $6.4 Government cost sharing

Bilateral/Multilateral Funds $2.5 $.3 $2.0

2015 2016 2017

Top 10 Sources of Funding Based on Programme Expenditures, 2015-2017 Millions UNDP Regular Resources $24.6 GEF Trust Fund $4.1 Peacebuilding Fund $1.8 European Commission $1.1 UNDSS $1.0 Southern African Development Community $.8 UNOCHA/CERF $.4 Government of Norway $.4 MPTF-JP MDG Androy Region $.2 Government of Japan $.1

Top 10 Donors of mobilised resources Based on signed agreements, 2015-2017 Millions GEF Trust Fund $13.8 Peacebuilding Fund $4.2 European Commission $4.0 USAID $1.2 Southern African Development Community $0.8 MPTF-JP MDG Androy Region $0.5 UNOCHA/CERF $0.4 Government of France $0.3 Government of Norway $0.2 Government of Switzerland $0.1

Source: UNDP Madagascar Country office

Expenditure by Gender Marker Expenditure by Gender Marker and Year Millions Millions $10

GEN0 $4.4 $8 GEN2 $6 GEN1 $5.6 $4 GEN1 GEN2 $22.2 $2 GEN0 GEN3 $0 GEN3 $1.6 2015 2016 2017 Program Expenditure by Source Millions CORE NON-CORE

2015 $10.7 $5.6

2016 $9.6 $3.3

2017 $7.7 $5.1

Implementation Modality Modality Number of Outputs Number of Projects

DIM 18

NIM 30

Annex 4: PROJECT LIST

Start End NIM Gender Project Project_title Output Output_Descr date date DIM Marker 2015 2016 2017 Grand Total Outcome 28 - Emploi et développement durable

00061027 Managed Resources Protected Area 00077104 PIMS 4172 BD FSP: Madagascar M 2011 2017 NIM GEN1 1,347,311 1,778,551 703,626 3,829,488 00078856 Preparation projet Adaptation et Resilience aux CC 00088945 Preparation projet Adaptation 2011 2017 DIM GEN1 64,215 64,215 00080514 Préparation projet Approche paysage 00090153 Préparation projet Approche pa 2014 2017 NIM GEN0 125,334 19,560 144,893 PLANIFICATION DU DEVELOPPEMENT, SECTEUR PLANIFICATION DU 00087361 PRIVE ET EMPLOI 00094390 DEVELOPPEMENT 2015 2019 NIM GEN1 472,064 250,127 232,453 954,644 00094391 SECTEUR PRIVE ET EMPLOI 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 1,276,291 1,516,392 2,486,701 5,279,384 00094655 PBF Surge 2015 2016 NIM GEN0 242,596 204,516 447,111 GESTION DU BUDGET POUR LA CROISSANCE GESTION BUDGETAIRE ET 00087362 INCLUSIVE ET ODD 00094392 OMD/ODD 2015 2019 NIM GEN0 487,338 761,597 386,453 1,635,387 PROMOTION DES MOYENS DE SUBSISTANCE 00088848 DURABLES 00095327 MSD MENABE 2015 2017 NIM GEN2 92,212 102,600 194,812 MSD ATSINANANA ET ATSIMO 00095328 ANDR 2015 2017 NIM GEN2 146,528 93,853 240,380 RENFORCEMENT CAPACITES 00089041 RESILIENCE COMMUNAUTAIRE 00095437 AGRICOL 2015 2017 OTHERS GEN2 20,598 224,915 245,513 00095438 PROGRAMMATION SAISONNIERE 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 358,779 358,779 00095439 ACCES AU FONCIER 2015 2019 OTHERS GEN2 74,637 74,637 00095440 ACCES FINANCE INCLUSIVE 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 67,887 122,367 190,255 00095441 ALPHABETISATION ET FP 2015 2019 OTHERS GEN2 120,767 23,076 143,843 00095442 PROMOTION CHAINES DE VALEURS 2015 2019 OTHERS GEN2 26,145 26,145 00095443 PROMOTION EMPLOI JEUNES 2015 2019 OTHERS GEN2 713,833 93,680 807,513 00090256 Projet Adaptation aux CC 00096109 Amélioration adaptation aux CC 2015 2017 NIM GEN2 34,296 913,408 947,704 00091371 Initiative pour l Emploi Vert 00096638 Emploi vert cree 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 33,200 75,561 108,761 DVLPMT ACCELERE ECONOMIE 00091469 Développement accéléré de l’économie rural 00096679 RURAL 2015 2016 NIM GEN2 61,783 87,438 149,221 TECHNOLOGIE SANS 00092732 REDUIRE POP MERCURE 00097308 INCINERATION 2015 2019 NIM GEN1 7,613 162,524 170,137 RENFORCEMENT CAPACITE NATIONALE 00096501 ENVIRONNEMENTALE 00100438 Document de projet 2016 2017 NIM GEN0 32,685 11,898 44,583 00098224 Relèvement précoce grand sud 00101612 Coordination de la reponse 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 159,621 299,297 458,918 00099229 Approche paysage foret Atsimo Andrefana 00102535 Protéger la biodiversité 2016 2021 NIM GEN2 183,296 183,296 00104234 DTF MDG 2017 00105906 DTF MDG 2017 2017 2017 DIM GEN3 69,581 69,581 Total outcome 28 5,630,734 5,689,229 5,449,237 16,769,200

Outcome 29 - Gouvernance Projet d'Appui au Cycle Electoral à Madagascar 00070692 2012-2014 00084541 Gestion & Fonctionnement PACEM 2012 2016 DIM GEN0 1,315,741 488,692 95,526 1,899,960 00084804 Dialogue et Prévention Conflit 2012 2016 DIM GEN1 305,651 4,588 310,239 00085200 Renforcement Capacités CENIT 2013 2018 DIM GEN3 1,119,423 1,119,423 00085356 Renf. capacités autres/sensib° 2013 2017 DIM GEN3 236,421 -11,705 224,715 00086068 Organisation des Scrutins 2013 2016 DIM GEN2 1,508,995 1,508,995 APPUI DECENTRALISATION ET RESILIENCE 00087359 COMMUNAUTAIRE 00094388 Collectivités structurées 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 1,092,651 1,634,409 1,075,137 3,802,197 00094710 Prg conjoint réponse VIH/SIDA 2015 2017 NIM GEN0 178,923 87,757 266,680 16

00087360 RENFORCEMENT ETAT DE DROIT 00094389 Etat de Droit et Redevabilité 2015 2019 NIM GEN2 699,246 937,333 575,243 2,211,822 00097006 Reconciliation et sécurité 2015 2017 NIM GEN2 37,387 305,923 -37 343,272 00101295 CENI Outillée 2015 2019 DIM GEN2 -32,589 92 -32,496 PROJET RESPONSABILISATION ET 00088550 AUTONOMISATION FEMMES 00095160 Participation Femmes 2015 2016 NIM GEN3 202,967 202,967 APPUI RECONCILIATION NATIONALE ET 00088839 CONSOLIDATION PAIX 00095321 Prevention conflit et paix 2015 2017 NIM GEN2 176,146 132,994 309,140 00097146 Institutions democratiques 00100981 Institutions democratiques int 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 11,885 418,253 430,138 00097148 Appui a la RSS à Madagascar 00100983 Sécurité communautaire 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 148,279 148,279 00102851 Acteur en charge état de droit 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 170,368 170,368 00098696 Appui au Secrétariat Technique du Fonds 00101926 Appui au Secrétariat Technique 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 103,764 436,360 540,124 00099549 Assistance préparatoire Elections 00102833 CENI outillee 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 815,899 352,568 1,168,467 00102837 Acteurs politiques renforces 2016 2018 DIM GEN2 44,911 141,403 186,314 00103705 SOUTIEN AU CYCLE ELECTORAL 00105598 Soutien au cycle electoral 2017 2017 DIM GEN2 1,269,597 1,269,597 Total outcome 29 6,873,550 4,523,860 4,682,789 16,080,199 Outcome inconnu - non lié au CPD 00033363 Joint UNDP-DPA Programme on Conflict Prevention 00034603 UNDP-DPA: Conflct Prevention 2004 2016 DIM 114,556 114,556 00049833 PIMS 2503 NCSA Madagascar 00061147 PIMS 2503 NCSA Madagascar 2009 2015 NIM 1,150 1,150 00058335 Sustainaible Land Management 00072428 Sustanaible Land Management 2009 2017 NIM GEN2 31,547 31,547 Moyens de Subsistance Durable Lutte Contre la 2012 2017 NIM 00063836 Pauvreté 00080717 Installation Dispositif Appui GEN2 271,842 271,842 00080718 Les moyens fédérateurs promus 2012 2017 NIM GEN2 193,097 193,097 00080720 Concept marché inclusif promu 2012 2015 NIM GEN2 214,691 214,691 00081539 Plans aménagement eau élaborés 2012 2017 NIM GEN1 223 223 00081540 Objectif du programme atteint 2012 2019 NIM GEN1 8,398 8,398 PROGRAMME « DROITS, DEVOIRS ET COHESION 2012 2014 NIM 00064869 SOCIALE» 00081518 Journalistes outillés en zones GEN2 8,571 8,571 00072065 Développement et Planification Territoriale 00085287 Développement et Planification 2013 2015 DIM GEN1 298,700 298,700 Total Outcome inconnu 1,111,229 31,547 0 1,142,776

Total Global 13,615,513 10,244,637 10,132,026 33,992,175

Annex 5: CPD RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND STATUS OF INDICATORS

“Outcomes,” “Indicator,” “Baseline,” and “Target” are defined in the 2015-2019 CPD. Any updates to these are reflected in the UNDP Corporate Planning System. “Status and progress” information, as well as the footnote comments, were extracted from the UNDP Corporate Planning System. Status/Progress Outcome / Indicator Baseline Target (2019) 2015 2016 2017 Outcome #28 – Vulnerable people in targeted areas have access to income and employment opportunities, improving their resilience and contributing to inclusive and equitable growth, which in turn leads to sustainable development. 52.7% (2012) - - - Rate of extreme poverty 70.7% 16 (updated in 40% 2017) No data No data No data

- - - Underemployment rate 80% (2012) 60% No data No data No data

Employment rate (formal and informal) disaggregated by - - 84.84% 17 sector, sub-sector, gender, age, vulnerable groups and 83.3% (2012) 90% income category if available No data No data Some progress

0.318 1.46319 1.463 20 Area (in millions Ha) of sustainably managed land, developed land, conservation reserve, or with generated 0.3 (2014) 1.5 benefits access/usage. No change Significant progress Significant progress

16 2012 Data updated based on the March 2017 World Bank report – no new data is available for recent years. 17 Source : ILO Madagascar 18 Protected areas were created by decree, the tools for their sustainable management need to be operationalized. 19 Business plans have been developed, validated, and are currently being implemented. 20 Within the MRPA project, 1.464.973 Ha of land are now sustainably managed and under conservation. The objective of 1.5 million Ha was not reached for administrative reasons, related to cartographic refining and rare-earth protection. 18

Status/Progress Outcome / Indicator Baseline Target (2019) 2015 2016 2017 MDG_OUTCOME29 – Public institutions, civil society and media, at the central and decentralized levels, fulfill their role and are accountable, contributing to pacific governance which protects human rights.

% of public spending under the responsibility of -- 1% 21 5%22 decentralized territorial entities (Collectivités 5% (2010) 15% Territoriales Decentralisées or CTD) No data Regression Some progress

Number of people that have access to judicial - 43 38523 49 885 24 services (disaggregated by gender and population 39 382 (2013) 100 000 group) No data Some progress Some progress

% of recommendations from the Universal Periodic - 28% 25 63.06% 26 Review mechanism (UPR) that have been endorsed 58% (2014) 70% and implemented No data Some progress Significant progress

------27 Men/Women ratio in Parliament 0.26 (2014) 0.54

No change No change No change

Source: Corporate Planning Website / IWP – Programme results.

21 According to the SEFAFI (SEhatra FAnaraha-maso ny FIainam-pirenena), this indicator’s value has fallen under 1% 22 Estimation from the Ministry of Interior and Decentralization 23 Out of 4002 people that have had access in 2016, 2785 were women 24 Out of 6500 (new) people that had access to judicial services in the targeted areas in 2017, 5265, or 81%, were women. 25 The baseline (58%) related to the 2010-2014 UPR cycle. For the current 2014-2018 cycle, 28% of the recommendations have been implemented after 2 years. Source: Ministry of Justice 26 63.06% (Source: Ministry of Justice). Related to the 2014-2018 UPR cycle. 27 The ratio has not changed since 2014 (26%), the country did not organize parliamentary elections since. Updated data for this indicator will be available following the 2018 elections.

Annex 6: PERSONS CONSULTED

AGOKLA-DZOGBEDO Afi (Ms), Conseiller Technique Principal Finance Inclusive, United Nations Capital Development Fund (Chief Technical Advisor Inclusive finance)

ANACLET Daniel (M), Directeur Executif, Conseil de Développement d’Andohatapenaka

ANDRIAMALAZARAY Andoniaina (M), Président National, KMF/CNOE - Fanabeazana Olompirenena/Education des Citoyens

ANDRIAMANANA Tolotra (mme), Chargée de Programme – Genre, Fond des Nations Unies pour la Population (Programme Specialist – Gender)

ANDRIAMANANAVO Remahavotse, Maire Imongy CR Tsihombe

ANDRIAMANDIMBISOA Holihasinoro S., Team Leader Pauvreté et Environnement

ANDRIAMIFIDY Jean Louis (M) Directeur Général, Bureau Indépendant Anti-Corruption

ANDRIANAJAKA Nirina Haja (M), Spécialiste en Suivi et Evaluation, Bureau du Coordonnateur Résident, Nations Unies (Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, Resident Coordinator's Office, United Nations)

ANDRIANJAKARIVELO Solofonirina, Membre du cabinet du Président du CENI

ANDRIANTSIMIETRY Sandrine Dr. (Mme), Coordonnateur National du Projet UPOPS

ANDRIATSIFERANA Dany, Point focal Région Androy PACARC Tsihombe

BENJA, Maire Maheny CR Beloha

BONI OUATTARA, Edith (Mme), Conseiller technique en Santé Maternelles, Fond des Nations Unies pour la Population (Technical Specialist Maternal Health)

BOTO François (M.), CLD, Village Tsirosy, Commune de Milenaka

CAROLIN Désiré, Para Juriste Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

Cdt FALY Aritiana Fabien, Coordonnateur de projet au BNGRC

CHERIF Mohamed A., Responsible Pays, Banque Africaine de Développement

CHRISTIAN Eric (M.) Conseiller en Prévention, Branche territoriale BIANCO, Toliara

DAMY, Directeur de Cabinet de la CU Ambovombe et Responsable de Projet

DIMOND Marie, Représentant Résident Adjoint, Programme

DODOO Ishmael, Regional Specialist, RBA

FALY Aritiana Fabien, Coordonnateur de Projet, Officier de Liaison du Corps de Protection Civile, Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes

FARALAHIVELO Marie Rufin, Président du Tribunal de Première Instance (TPI) Ambovombe

FUNAKOSHI Yohei (Mr. ) Adjoint au Représentant Résident et Administrateur du Programme, Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale (JICA)

Gal RAMBOLARSON Charles, Secrétaire Exécutif Adjoint du BNGRC

GEVERS Coralie (Mme), Country Manager, Banque Mondiale

HATAHIRISOA Miora Fahasoavana, VNU en appui de proximité Beloha

IARIMANANA, Maire Ankilivalo CR Tsihombe

ICHIJO Motonobu (Mr), Premier Secrétaire, Ambassade du Japon

JAOSOLO Gelase (M), Directeur Général d’Appui au Développement, Ministère de l’Economie et du Plan

KAKYOMYA Violette, Représentant Résident PNUD

KALAMEU Omer Kebiwou (Mr) Conseiller aux Droits de l’Homme, Bureau du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies aux Droits de l’Homme (Human Rights Advisor, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights)

KIDJA Marie Francine (Mme), Directeur Général de la Promotion de la Femme, Ministère de la Population, de la Protection Sociale et de la Promotion de la Femme

KROSBY Alexander, Chargée de Programme, Bureau de l’Ambassade Royale de Norvège

LAGERA Martial, Directeur d'Agence Adjoint d'OTIV Tana Fort Dauphin

LALANNE Marc (M), Chargé de programme, Volontaires des Nations Unies (UNV Programme Officer, United Nations Volunteers)

LENOME Divet, Maire Tranoroa CR Beloha

MAHAMARO Jean Michel, Membre Comité Local de Secours Ambovombe

MAHANDRY Hervé Soja, VNU Animateur Gouvernance locale PADRC Tsihombe

MAHAZOTAHY Sylvain, Recteur de l'Université d'Androy Ambovombe

MAMODALY Zoulphicaraly, Maire de la Commune Urbain d'Ambovombe

MANAGNOHATSY Prosper, Maire Bahabobo CR Beloha

MANAMBOLO Jacques, Maire Marovato CR Tsihombe

MANANKERY Faniria Léon, Chef de service de la promotion des jeunes (Maison des jeunes Ambovombe)

MANIHARIVELO Victor (Mr) Programme Associate, FAO

MANOLOSOA Jean Pierre, Maire Nikoly CR Tsihombe

MAROVOTOTSY Maire Antaritarika, CR Tsihombe

MARTIN Stéphanie (Mme), Chargée du Volet RSS, Projet ARSSAM, PNUD Madagascar

MISONI Flavien Mbayahe, Conseiller Technique Principal, SACEM

MOSA Romain, Chef de la Préfecture de l'Androy

NDALONA Marion, SAGE, Coordonnateur Toliara

NDRIANDAZAINA Hanitra, Conseiller en Education, Branche territoriale du BIANCO, Toliara

NOMESOA Colette (Mme), Coordinatrice et Présidente de l’ONG CAFED/FAFED, Clinique juridique Toliara

NYAKI ZANGBULA Kaningbi (M), Chargé Principal des Opérations, Banque Africaine de Développement

OUEDRAOGO Moumini (M) Directeur de Pays et Représentant, Programme Alimentaire Mondial (Country Director and Representative, World Food Programme)

PEPIN Jean Claude, SG Préfecture

PORTE Franck (M.), Chef de Coopération, Délégation de l’Union européenne

PROSPER Clément (M.) Deuxième Adjoint du Maire, Commune Rurale de Saint-Augustin, Toliara

RABEFARIHY Hanta, Conseiller Technique Principal MRPA

RABENAIVOMANAMIHANTA Lovatahina, Directeur d'Agence d'OTIV Tana Fort Dauphin

RADANYMANAHIRA Pascal (M.), Maire, Commune de Saint-Augustin, Toliara

RAFIDIMANANA, Hery Nirina Jimmy, Directeur chargé de l’Administration et la Finance, Bureau Indépendant Anti-Corruption

RAHARIJAONA Tsilavina Roméo, Chauffeur PDSPE

RAHARISON Clément (M.) Chef de division Education – Prévention, Branche territoriale du BIANCO, Toliara

RAHARIVELO Verosoa, Chargée de Programme Environnement et Eau, PNUD Madagascar

RAHERIVELONJARA Aimé Michel, PACARC

RAJAOBELINA Falihery, Secrétaire Général, Ministère des Finances et du Budget

RAJAONARISOA Mamitinne, Directeur territorial, BIANCO, Toliara

RAKOTOARISOA Ignace, 1er Adjoint au Maire CR Mahitsy

RAKOTOARISON Emile Razafimahatratra, VNU en appui de proximité Beloha

RAKOTOBE Tovondriaka, Secrétaire Général/MAE

RAKOTOMANANA Yves Herinirina (M.), Président de la CENI

RAKOTOMANGA Alexandre, Chauffeur PADRC

RAKOTONANAHARY Holiarisoa, VNU en appui de proximité Tsihombe

RAKOTONDRAZAFY Hasina (Mme), Spécialiste en Coordination, Bureau du Coordonnateur résident (UN Coordination Specialist, Resident Coordinator’s Office)

RAKOTONIARIVO Rodin, Coordinateur technique national SAGE

RAKOTOZANANY Celestin, Secrétaire Général/MID

RAMAHA RAKOTONIDINA (M.), Secrétaire général de la Commune Urbaine de Toliara

RAMANANJAFY Auguste, 3ème Adjoint au Maire CU Ambovombe

RAMANANJOELINA Tsimbina, Point focal de développement auprès de la CR Mahitsy

RAMANDAZAFY Zoara, Responsible Communication (PACARC)

RAMANGAVOLOLONA Harivola, AAF PDSPE

RAMAROSON Nivohary, Directrice du Bureau National de coordination sur le Changement Climatique (BNCC)

RAMBOLANOMENAHOSOLO Sahondra, Directeur des Coopérations Economiques Extérieures, Ministère de l’Economie et du Plan

RAMBOLARSON Charles, Secrétaire Exécutif Adjoint, Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes

RANAIVOMANANA Jean Bertrand, Coordinateur Régional Androy, Life Giving Water – Social Development

RANARIVELO Harilal (M), Assistant administratif et financier, Conseil de Développement d’Andohatapenaka

RANARIVELO Ny Andry, Spécialiste en développement communautaire Beloha

RANDAHY Benjanahary (M) Coordonnateur Général des Programmes et Projets, Ministère de l’Economie et du Plan

RANDRIANAIVO, Didier (M), Développement des activités à la Clinique Juridique, Conseil de Développement d’Andohatapenaka

RANDRIANAMBININA Jean Noel, VNU spécialiste en Appui de proximité

RANDRIANANDRASANA Ramananjafy, VNU en appui de proximité Tsihombe

RANDRIANANTENAINA Lahininina Chariel (M.), Para-juriste, Clinique juridique, Toliara

RANDRIANARISON Jean Gabriel (M.), Secrétaire Général, Ministère de l’Economie et du Plan

RANDRIANAVONY Anicet, MRPA

RANDRIANIRINA Michael, Chef de Région Androy

RANDRIANJAFISOLO Anthony, Directeur de cabinet du SG de l'Assemblée National

RANDRIANJAFISON Haniela Nambinintsoa, Coordonnateur National du projet PACARC

RANDRIANJAGIZANAKA SOARY (M.), Directeur, Direction Régionale Atsimo Andrefana/Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie et des Forêts,

RANDRIANLALA Thierry (M), Programme Manager, FAO

RANTOAVINA Patrice Falison (M.), Responable Maison des Jeunes Betavia Ankilifaly, Toliara

RAOLIARISOA Harimanitra, VNU spécialiste en Appui de proximité

RASOAMIARANIRINA Ranivoarinosy, RSE SAGE, Antananarivo

RASOANAIVO Andriamalala, Chef d’Antenne Atsimo Andrefana, Fondation Tany Meva

RASOANANDRASANA Georgeline, Présidente SLC Ambovombe

RASOANANTENAINA Edoxie, Spécialiste GRC

RASOLOARISOA Robine, Directeur de Projet Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin (Clinique Judiciaire)

RASOLONDRAIBE Germain, 1er Adjoint au Maire CU Ambovombe

RASOLONDRAINY Jeannick, Directeur du Centre d'Appui aux Communes (CAC) à Tsihombe

RASOLONJATOVO Jean Victor Nirina, Secrétaire Exécutif National de la CENI

Ravaka, IDIRC

RAVAOARISOA Charlotte (Mme.), Para-juriste, Clinique juridique, Toliara

RAVELOMITA, Adjoint au Maire de Beloha

RAVELONJANAHARY Nicole Rachelle, Directeur de la Coordination Interne, Ministère des finances et du budget

RAVELOSON Jean de Dieu, Directeur de Cabinet du Président du CENI

RAVELOSON Joel Lovanirina, Coordonnateur de Programme du projet sur la Convention de Rio

RAVELOSON Voahangy (Mme), Coordinatrice nationale, KMF/CNOE - Fanabeazana Olompirenena/Education des Citoyens

RAVOAHANGILALAO Francis, MEP

RAZAENDANDALALAMBO Taliana, Responsable technique, Direction Régionale Atsimo Andrefana/Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Écologie et des Forêts

RAZAFIARISON Jean Christian (M.) Directeur de la Planification Globale, Ministère de l’Economie et du Plan

RAZAFIARISONY Hyacinthe Aimé, Chef de Division Investigation, Branche territoriale du BIANCO, Toliara

RAZAFIMAHEFA Manoela (Mme), Chargée de Programmes, Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale (JICA)

RAZAFIMANANTSOA Tofito (Mr.) Directeur Général des Programmes et Ressources, Ministère de la Justice (+261 32 03 300 92; dgprajustice.mg)

RAZAFIMANATSOA Deleau, Assistant Resident Representative, Governance Programme, PNUD Madagascar

RAZAFIMANDIMBY Mahavita Daniel, Chef d'Antenne du Bureau National de GRC Ambovombe

RAZAFIMANDOMBA Léon Tovonasy (M.), Assistant Parlementaire du Vice-Président de l’Assemblée Nationale, proposé Secrétaire général de la Commune rurale de Saint-Augustin

RAZAFINDRALAMBO GUY (M.), Unité De Coordination des Projets Environnement (UCPE)

RAZAFINJATOVO Honoré Parfait (Mr.) Magistrat, Secrétaire Général du Ministère de la Justice

RAZAFINTSOA Martine, Dépositaire auprès de la CR Mahitsy

RAZAFISOAZARA Mihajasoa G, VNU spécialiste en Appui de proximité

RAZANADRAVILY Justine Lange Laïla, VNU Animateur Gouvernance locale PADRC Tsihombe

RAZATOMANANIRINA Alain (M.), PRMP, Direction Régionale Atsimo Andrefana/Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Écologie et des Forêts

RAZOARIHOLY Norosenheno, Chef de Division Prévention, Contrôle et Suivi et Evaluation, Bureau Indépendant Anti-Corruption

REFARA Katonirino (M.), CIR Commune de Milenaka

RETSITAMBY, Maire Tranovaho CR Beloha

ROGULSKI Andrzej (M), Conseiller de Coopération et d’Action Culturelle, Directeur de l’Institut Français à Madagascar, Ambassade de France

ROUGERIE Julien, Food Security and Nutrition Specialist, USAID (Spécialiste en Nutrition et Sécurite Alimentaire)

SAHONDRANIRINA Justine, Coordonateur Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

SALAME Abdou (M.) Coordonnateur du Programme d’Appui à la Décentralisation et à la Résilience Communautaire

SALIM Léonard Samdjee, Maire Marolinta CR Beloha

SARTVAHY Tovonozatsy, Maire Betanty Faux Cap CR Tsihombe

SCHATZ Florian (M), Conseiller technique/Expert du GiZ intégré au Bureau Indépendant Anti-Corruption

SOALAHATSE, Maire Behazomanga CR Tsihombe

SOJA II, 2ème Adjoint au Maire CU Ambovombe

SOSOLOHARINAIVO Yrma, Stagiaire Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

STERN Michael A, Program Office Director, USAID Madagascar (Directeur des Programmes)

TALLA TAKOUKAM Patrice (M), Représentant, Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture

TAMBISON Edmé Damase, Pocureur de la Répulique près de la TPI d'Ambovombe

TATANGIRAFENO Sebastien, Spécialiste en développement communautaire Tsihombe

THOMAS Rosat Nantenaina, Responsable Administratif et Financier Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

TODISOA KOTONIRINA, CLD Village Belanovenoba, Commune de Milenaka

TOLIA Bernard Maire Anjampaly, CR Tsihombe

TOMBOVELO Raminoson, Para Juriste Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

TOVONAY Félix (M.), Secrétaire CLD, Commune de Milenaka

TOVONDRIAKA Rakotobe (Mr.), Secrétaire général du Ministère auprès de la Présidence en charge de l’Agriculture et de l’Elevage

TSAMPAGAY Koto, Gardien Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

TSIALAHATSE, Maire Beloha

TSIOLANY, Maire Ambatotsivala CR Beloha

VELOMILA Jeannot, Para Juriste Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

VONINIRINA Amélie (Mme), Coordinateur de Programme GBCI, PNUD Madagascar

VONTSOA Christian, Maire Tsihombe

VOTSIRASOA Mazareny Lassice (M.), Para-juriste, Clinique juridique Toliara

VOULAND-ANEINI Véronique (Mme), Ambassadeur, Ambassade de France

WHYNER Daniel E., Environment and Climate Change Office Director, USAID Madagascar (Directeur du Programme de l’Environnement et du Changement Climatique)

WISCH Elke (Mme) Représentante, UNICEF (Representative, UNICEF)

ZAFIAVY Deviro, Para Juriste Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

ZAFIAVY Eulogine, Para Juriste Trano Aro Zo Fort Dauphin

ZAFILAHY Adrien, Responsable de Suivi de Programmes, Unité de Gestion de la Stratégie Nationale de Développement Local, Ministre de l’Intérieur et de la Décentralisation

ZEMENE Wilson Magniraka (M.), CCF, Village Vehivavy, Commune de Milenaka

ZOUNON Armel, VNU International Coordonateur Régional du PNUD

In addition, the evaluation team also held various interviews with groups of beneficiaries in Androy, Toliara and Mahitsy.

Annex 7: DOCUMENTS CONSULTED

African Development Bank (2016). Madagascar economic management reform support programme (PARGE). https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and- Operations/Madagascar_PARGE_Appraisal_Report_ENG_Final.pdf.

African Development Bank (2017). African Economic Outlook 2017: Entrepreneurship and industrialization. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/AEO_2017_Report_Full_Englis h.pdf

ALTEC Madagascar (2017). Capitalisation des acquis du projet MRPA. ALTEC Madagascar.

Banque Mondiale Madagascar (2015). Diagnostic systématique de pays : Madagascar. http://www.ordiecole.com/mada2012/journaux/20151100_diagnostic_banque_mondiale.pdf.

Banque Mondiale, Madagascar Vue d'ensemble, http://www.banquemondiale.org/fr/country/madagascar/overview

Bechraoui, N. et Ramanitriniaina, H. (2017). Revue à mi-parcours du Programme Pays (2015-2019). Programme des Nations unies pour le développement, Madagascar.

Bureau d’appui à la consolidation de la paix (2017). Renforcement de l’autorité de l’Etat dans le Sud de Madagascar (RAES). https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/MDG/RAES%20- %20PNUD%20et%20OIM%20(final%20signé).pdf.

Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes (BNGRC), Stratégie Nationale sur la Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes

Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes (BNGRC), Loi 2015-031 relative à la Politique Nationale sur la Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes

Commission Électorale Nationale Indépendante (2017). Rapport d’Évaluation de la mise en œuvre du Plan de travail pluriannuel 2016 – 2021 de la CENI (Période 2015 – 2017). https://www.ceni- madagascar.mg/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/RAPPORT-DEVALUATION-DU-PTP-CENI-TABLE-DES- MATIERES-AUTO.pdf

FAO (2015). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808e.pdf

FAO et PAM (2017). Rapport spécial - Mission FAO/PAM d’Evaluation des récoltes et de la sécurité alimentaire à madagascar. http://www.fao.org/3/I8306FR/i8306fr.pdf

FAO, FSIN, rapport mondial sur les crises alimentaires 2017, http://www.fao.org/3/a-br324f.pdf

Fond Monétaire International, Madagascar Selected Issues July 2017, IMF Country Report No. 17/224.

Fond Monétaire International (2016). République de Madagascar - Évaluation de la stabilité du système financier. Rapport du FMI no 16/377.

Food Security Information Network (2017). Rapport Mondial sur les crises alimentaires 2017. http://www.fao.org/3/a-br324f.pdf

Gouvernement de Madagascar (2015). DECRET n° 2015 – 957 Relatif à la Structure Locale de Concertation des Collectivités territoriales décentralisées.

Gouvernement de Madagascar (2015). Plan National de Développement (PN) 2015-2019. http://mg.chm-cbd.net/implementation/Documents_nationaux/document-cadre/plan-national-de- developpement-pnd-2015-2019

Gouvernement de Madagascar (2015). Stratégie Nationale de lutte contre la corruption 2015-2025. http://bianco-mg.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SNLCC-BOOKLET-A5.compressed.pdf

Gouvernement de Madagascar (2016). Loi n°2016-020 sur la lutte contre la corruption.

Gouvernement de Madagascar, Primature (2017). Plan national de la réforme du secteur de la sécurité. http://www.primature.gov.mg/plan-national-de-la-reforme-du-secteur-de-la-securite/

Groupe-conseil baastel (2012). UNDP/GEF Support to Madagascar’s Environmental Programme- Phase III (EP III) – Support to the Protected Area Network and Strategic Zones. Terminal Evaluation. Final Report. https://www.gefpmis.org/GEFProjectDocuments/MandE/EO_TEs_FY13/UNDP_TEs_APR2013/1884_UN DP_TE_EP3_UNDP_TE_Final_Report_07Dec2012_final_EN.pdf.

Groupe-conseil baastel (2017). Évaluation finale du projet MRPA “Network of Managed Resources Protected Areas”. Rapport d’évaluation finale.

Haute Cour Constitutionnelle (HCC), Décision n 15 - HCC/D3 du 3 mai portant sur la loi organique n 2018 – 008, http://www.hcc.gov.mg/decisions/d3/decision-n15-hcc-d3-du-3-mai-2018-portant-sur-la-loi- organique-n2018-008-relative-au-regime-general-des-elections-et-des-referendums/

Imbiki, Anaclet (2014). La réconciliation nationale à Madagascar : Une perspective complexe et difficile. L’Harmattan, Paris.

INSTAT, Enquête Périodique auprès des ménages 2010 - 2011

Lavigne Delville, Ph. (2016). Microfinance et mobilisation de l’anthropologie : une expérience dans le sud malgache. Bulletin de l'APAD. http://apad.revues.org/4122

Madagascar Matin (2018). Changement climatique – Le phénomène El Niño qui prend fin et ses conséquences. http://www.matin.mg/?p=35527

Madagascar Matin, Changement Climatique - le phènomene El Niño qui prend fin et ses conséquences, http://www.matin.mg/?p=35527

Ministère de l’Économie et de la Planification, Madagascar (2017). Document de développement économique 2017 -2019.

Ministère de l’Économie et des Finance, France (2016). Madagascar. https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Ressources/Pays/madagascar/6.

Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie et des Forêts, Madagascar (2014). Auto-évaluation Nationale des Capacités - Rapport Final et Plan d’Action.

Ministère de l'Intérieur et de la Décentralisation, Loi Organique 2014 sur la décentralisation

Ministère de l'Intérieur et de la Décentralisation, Stratégie Nationale de Développement Local (SNDL)

PNUD (2016). Human Development Report 2016.

PNUD Madagascar (2015). La stratégie 2015-2019 du PNUD Madagascar pour la promotion de l'égalité genre et de l'autonomisation des femmes.

PNUD Madagascar (2015). Le PNUD en action : Sur le chemin du développement - Rapport annuel 2014- 2015 – Madagascar. http://www.mg.undp.org/content/dam/madagascar/docs/rapportsUNDP_MDG/rapport- annuel/UNDP_mg2016_doc_Rapport2015.pdf

PNUD Madagascar (2015). PACEM - Rapport annuel d’activités 2015.

PNUD Madagascar (2015). Présentation du Projet Managed Resources Protected Areas (MRPA). http://mg.chm-cbd.net/implementation/acteurs-pour-la-mise-en-oeuvre/acteurs-nationaux/ministeres- sectoriels/ministere-de-l-environnement-de-l-ecologie-de-la-mer-et-des-forets/projets- programmes/projet-managed-resources-protected-areas-mrpa/presentation-du-projet-managed- resources-protected-areas-mrpa

PNUD Madagascar (2016). Projet d'Appui à la Réconciliation Nationale et la Consolidation de la Paix (PAPRECOP) - Rapport annuel 2016.

PNUD Madagascar (2016). Soutien au Gouvernement Malgache dans la Réponse à la Sécheresse provoquée par el Niño: Coordination de la Réponse et Développement d’un Plan Sectoriel de Relèvement Précoce. Draft Document de projet.

PNUD Madagascar (2017). Results Oriented Annual Report - MDG – 2017.

PNUD Madagascar (2017). Soutien au cycle électoral de Madagascar (SACEM) 2017 – 2019. Document de projet.

PNUD Madagascar (2017): Une mission conjointe de l’Etat Malagasy et du PNUD dans le Grand Sud de Madagascar. http://www.mg.undp.org/content/madagascar/fr/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2017/07/24/une- mission-conjointe-de-l-etat-malagasy-et-du-pnud-dans-le-grand-sud-de-madagascar.html).

PNUD Madagascar (2018). Androy: Un pas en avant pour renforcer la résilience de la population dans les sites d’intervention des projets du gouvernement appuyés par le PNUD. http://www.mg.undp.org/content/madagascar/fr/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2018/02/04/androy -un-pas-en-avant-pour-renforcer-la-r-silience-de-la-population-dans-les-sites-d-intervention-des- projets-du-gouvernement-appuy-s-par-le-pnud.html.

PNUD Madagascar (2018). Favoriser l’accès à la justice des populations vulnérables avec les cliniques juridiques de Madagascar.

http://www.mg.undp.org/content/madagascar/fr/home/presscenter/articles/2018/02/27/favoriser-l- acc-s-la-justice-des-populations-vuln-rables-avec-les-cliniques-juridiques-de-madagascar-.html.

PNUD Madagascar (2018). Rapport National sur le Développement Humain - Madagascar 2018. http://www.mg.undp.org/content/madagascar/fr/home/library/mdg/publication_1111/.

PNUD, Communication pour le Développement (C4D): Accroître l'efficacité des Nation Unies, https://undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/c4d-effectiveness-of-UN-FR.pdf

PNUD, Rapport National sur le Développement Humain - Madagascar 2018, http://www.mg.undp.org/content/madagascar/fr/home/library/mdg/publication_1111/

Présidence de la République de Madagascar, Plan National de Développement durable (PND)

Présidence de Madagascar, Secrétariat Général (2017). Conseil des Ministres du Mercredi 27 Septembre 2017 à 16 Heures au Palais d’Etat d’Iavoloha. I.- Communications. http://www.presidence.gov.mg/wp- content/uploads/2017/09/CM-du-27-09-2017.pdf.

Primature, Plan National de la réforme du secteur de la sécurité, http://www.primature.gov.mg/plan- national-de-la-reforme-du-secteur-de-la-securite/

Primature, Stratégie nationale de lutte contre la corruption

Service de Santé et Environnement du Ministère de la Santé Publique, Guide technique de gestion des déchets médicaux, https://www.washinhcf.org/documents/Madagascar-HCWMGuide-tech

Système des Nations Unies à Madagascar (2014). UNDAF 2015-2019.

Transparency International Initiative (2017). Indice de Perception de la Corruption (IPC) 2017. https://transparency.mg/article/indice-de-perception-de-la-corruption-2017.

Transparency International Initiative Madagascar (2016). Ensemble contre la corruption: Stratégie 2010 de Transparency International Iniative – Madagascar. https://transparency.mg/assets/uploads/page_content_document/TI-IM_Strategie2020_v02_ok.pdf.

UNDP (2013). Guidance note - Community infrastructure rehabilitation. http://www.ba.undp.org.

UNDP (2016). Africa Human Development Report 2016: Accelerating Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313969250_Africa_Human_Development_Report_2016_Acc elerating_Gender_Equality_and_Women%27s_Empowerment_in_Africa.

UNDP/GEF (2015). Enhancing the adaptation capacities and resilience to climate change in rural communities in Analamanga, Atsinanana, Androy, Anosy and Atsimo Andrefana in Madagascar. Document de projet.

World Bank (2016). Shifting fortunes and enduring poverty in Madagascar: Recent findings. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/madagascar/publication/shifting-fortunes-and-enduring- poverty-in-madagascar-recent-findings.

World Bank (2017). Doing Business Economy Profile 2017 : Madagascar. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25584.