Political Parties and Democratization in Georgia a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Parties and Democratization in Georgia a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East POLITICAL PARTIES AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN GEORGIA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY YELDA KARADAĞ IN THE PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUIRMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EURASIAN STUDIES DECEMBER 2011 Approval of the Graduate of Social Sciences _________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. _________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Head of the Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. _________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Havva Kök Arslan (Hacettepe, IR.) _________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat (METU, SOC.) _________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant (METU, IR.) _________________ ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rule and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original in this work. Name, Last Name: Yelda Karadağ Signature: iii ABSTRACT THE POLITICAL PARTIES IN GEORGIAN DEMOCRATIZATION Karadağ, Yelda M.S., Department of Eurasian Studies Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat December 2011, 181 Pages This thesis analyzes the development of the multi-party system and the role of political parties in the process of democratization in Georgia during both pre- independence and post-independence periods. The conditions shaping both the multi-party system and democratization are analyzed in the light of findings obtained through in-depth interviews with the representatives of political parties, civil society organizations and academicians in Georgia. In accordance with the post-Soviet political system, the nature of the relationship between the ruling party and the opposition is crucial. The diversification among the elite groups and the lack of pact formation among the political elite is the main reason which hinders the process of democratization. Hence, despite the Georgian political party system has numerous political parties; it is shaped in accordance with the dominant political party system. Keywords: Georgia, Political Parties, Political Elites, Democratization iv ÖZ GÜRCİSTAN’DAKİ SİYASİ PARTİLER VE DEMOKRATİKLEŞME Karadağ, Yelda Yüksek Lisans, Avrasya Çalışmaları Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Doç. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat Aralık 2011, 181 sayfa Bu tez Gürcistan’daki demokratikleşme sürecinde çok partili sistemin gelişimini ve siyasi partilerin rolünü incelemektedir. Gürcistan’daki çok partili sistem ve demokratikleşme sürecine ışık tutmak için bağımsızlık öncesi ve bağımsızlık sonrası süreçler ayrıntıyla incelenecektir. Hem çok partili sistemi hem de demokratikleşmeyi şekillendiren koşullar Gürcistan’daki siyasi parti yöneticileri, sivil toplum örgütleri sorumluları ve akademisyenler ile gerçekleştirilen derinlemesine mülakatlar ile elde edilen bulgular ışığında yorumlanmıştır. Sovyetler sonrası gelişen siyasi sistemde iktidar partisi ve muhalefetin arasındaki ilişkilerin niteliği demokratikleşme açısından önemlidir. Siyasi seçkinlerin arasındaki farklılaşma ve mutabakat eksikliği demokratikleşme sürecini sekteye uğratan temel nedenlerdir. Dolayısıyla, Gürcistan’daki siyasi parti sistemi sayı olarak birçok siyasi partiye sahip olsa da siyasi sistem iktidar partisinin güdümündedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Gürcistan, Siyasi Partiler, Siyasi Seçkinler, Demokratikleşme v To My Mother vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun Özbolat whose knowledge, experience and advice enabled me to pursue this study and conduct fieldwork in Georgia. Her guidance, encouragement and unfailing patience made this thesis possible. I want to express my sincere appreciation to Prof. Dr. Ayşe Ayata for her support and granting me the opportunity to conduct the fieldwork in Georgia. I would also like to thank the members of the examining committee, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Havva Kök Arslan and Asisst. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant for their comments and suggestions. I am grateful to the Georgian respondents for their trust and evaluations, which enlightened my way during the thesis process. I am also thankful to my beloved friends; Firuze Balta for her bright mind and unique companionship to grasp the world more. Ege Hazar Gürsoy for her invaluable friendship and encouragement all the time we shared in Georgia and at home. Leyla Sayfutdinova, who introduced Georgia and always refreshed my mind with her insightful suggestions. Daan Sauren for his moral support during the writing process. I also would like to express my gratitude to Gökten vii Doğangün, Duygu Ünsal and Zelal Özdemir, who are always with me with their everlasting support and understanding. Without you, it would be very difficult for me to write this thesis. I am very much indebted to Todd M. Warren for his valuable effort and friendship for editing my thesis. No words of gratitude would be sufficient enough to thank my beloved family, especially my mother, who never gave up encouraging and believing me. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM .......................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. iv ÖZ ............................................................................................................................... v DEDICATION .......................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................... vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. xiii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Methodology .................................................................................................... 5 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... .6 2.2 Definitions of Democratization ...................................................................... .6 2.3 Theories of Democratization ........................................................................... 9 2.4 Development of Political Parties in Post-Soviet Georgia .............................. 22 3. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 35 3.1 Political Context of the Pre-Independence Period ......................................... 37 ix 3.1.1 Political Movements in the Pre-Independence Period ........................... 47 3.2 Political Context of the Post-Independence Period ....................................... 51 3.2.1 The Gamsakhurdia Era .......................................................................... 51 3.2.2 The Shevardnadze Era ........................................................................... 57 3.3 The Rose Revolution ..................................................................................... 67 4. POLITICAL PARTIES IN GEORGIA ................................................................ 78 4.1 An Overview of the Multi-Party System ....................................................... 79 4.2 The Role of Political Parties in Democratization .......................................... 85 4.3 The Role of the Opposition Parties in Democratization .............................. 104 4.4 The Relationship between the Opposition Parties and the Ruling Party ..... 124 4.5 The Role of the International Actors in Democratization ........................... 138 4.6 The Future Prospects ................................................................................... 150 5.CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 162 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 167 APPENDICES A. INTERVIEW LIST ....................................................................................... 177 B. INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................... 179 C. TEZ FOTOKOPİSİ İZİN FORMU ............................................................... 180 x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AO Autonomous Oblasts AR Autonomous Regions ASSR Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republics CIPDD The Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development CoE Council of Europe CPSU Communist Party of the Soviet Union CRRC The Caucasus Research Resource Center CUG Citizens’ Union of Georgia EU European Union GCP The Georgian Communist Party GFSIS Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies GLP The Georgian Labour Party GSP The Georgian Socialist Party IFES International Foundation for Electoral Systems IRI International Republican Institute xi ISFED International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy
Recommended publications
  • Protecting Politics: Deterring the Influence Of
    Protecting Politics Deterring the Influence of Organized Crime on Elections Protecting Politics: Deterring the Influence of Organized Crime on Elections Elections are essential elements of democratic systems. Unfortunately, abuse and manipulation (including voter intimidation, vote buying or ballot stuffing) can distort these processes. However, little attention has been paid to an intrinsic part of this threat: the conditions and opportunities for criminal interference in the electoral process. Most worrying, few scholars have examined the underlying conditions that make elections vulnerable to organized criminal involvement. This report addresses these gaps in knowledge by analysing the vulnerabilities of electoral processes to illicit interference (above all by organized crime). It suggests how national and international authorities might better protect these crucial and coveted elements of the democratic process. Case studies from Georgia, Mali and Mexico illustrate these challenges and provide insights into potential ways to prevent and mitigate the effects of organized crime on elections. International IDEA Clingendael Institute ISBN 978-91-7671-069-2 Strömsborg P.O. Box 93080 SE-103 34 Stockholm 2509 AB The Hague Sweden The Netherlands T +46 8 698 37 00 T +31 70 324 53 84 F +46 8 20 24 22 F +31 70 328 20 02 9 789176 710692 > [email protected] [email protected] www.idea.int www.clingendael.nl ISBN: 978-91-7671-069-2 Protecting Politics Deterring the Influence of Organized Crime on Elections Protecting Politics Deterring the Influence of Organized Crime on Elections Series editor: Catalina Uribe Burcher Lead authors: Ivan Briscoe and Diana Goff © 2016 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance © 2016 Netherlands Institute of International Relations (Clingendael Institute) International IDEA Strömsborg SE-103 34 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 698 37 00, fax: +46 8 20 24 22 Email: [email protected], website: www.idea.int Clingendael Institute P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests
    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Implementation of the Code of Conduct by Political Parties in Georgia
    REPORT MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT BY POLITICAL PARTIES IN GEORGIA PREPARED BY GEORGIAN INSTITUTE OF POLITICS - GIP MAY 2021 ABOUT The Georgian Institute of Politics (GIP) is a Tbilisi-based non-profit, non-partisan, research and analysis organization. GIP works to strengthen the organizational backbone of democratic institutions and promote good governance and development through policy research and advocacy in Georgia. It also encourages public participation in civil society- building and developing democratic processes. The organization aims to become a major center for scholarship and policy innovation for the country of Georgia and the wider Black sea region. To that end, GIP is working to distinguish itself through relevant, incisive research; extensive public outreach; and a bold spirit of innovation in policy discourse and political conversation. This Document has been produced with the financial assistance of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the GIP and can under no circumstance be regarded as reflecting the position of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. © Georgian Institute of Politics, 2021 13 Aleksandr Pushkin St, 0107 Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 599 99 02 12 Email: [email protected] For more information, please visit www.gip.ge Photo by mostafa meraji on Unsplash TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 KEY FINDINGS 7 INTRODUCTION 8 METHODOLOGY 11 POLITICAL CONTEXT OF 2020 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS AND PRE-ELECTION ENVIRONMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Information Bulletin, No. 75 Council of Europe
    Human ISSN 1608-9618 H/Inf (2009) 1 Rights Information Bulletin No. 75, July-October 2008 Building a Europe for and with Children – Towards a strategy for 2009-2011 9-10 October 2008, Strasbourg 10 October 2008: European Day 8-10 September 2008, Stockholm Conference “Enhancing the impact of against the Death Penalty. This Day is A Seminar was organised on the the Framework Convention: past held on 10 October of each year. As theme “Towards European guidelines experience, present achievements and from October 2008, it is organised on child-friendly justice” in the future challenges” celebrating the 10th jointly with the European Union. framework of the Conference anniversary of the Framework “Building a Europe for and with Convention for the protection of Children – Towards a strategy for national minorities. 2009-2011”. Human rights information bulletin No. 75, July-October 2008 The Human rights information bulletin is published three times a year This issue published January 2009. Date of next issue: April 2009. ISSN: by the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council 1608-9618 (print edition) and 1608-7372 (electronic edition). Internet of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex. address: http://www.coe.int/justice/. Contents Treaties and conventions Signatures and ratifications . 4 European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber judgments . 5 I. v. Finland, 11 Cuc Pascu v. Romania, 19 Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey, 5 The Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia, 11 Bogumil v. Portugal, 19 Korbely v. Hungary, 7 Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, 13 Moiseyev v. Russia, 20 Kovačić and Others v. Slovenia, 8 Liberty & Other Organisations v.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Georgia 2014 Local Self-Government Elections
    Elections in Georgia 2014 Local Self-Government Elections Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Asia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW | Fifth Floor | Washington, D.C. 20006 | www.IFES.org June 9, 2014 Frequently Asked Questions Who will Georgians elect on June 15, 2014? ................................................................................................ 1 Why are the local self-government elections important? What is at stake? ............................................... 1 What are the changes to the local self-government elections in 2014? ...................................................... 2 Will there be any changes in the way voters are identified on the voter lists on Election Day? ................. 3 What is the current political situation in Georgia? ....................................................................................... 3 What is the state of political parties in Georgia? ......................................................................................... 4 When will the results be announced? .......................................................................................................... 4 What laws regulate the self-government elections in Georgia? .................................................................. 4 Who is eligible to run for mayor, gamgebeli, or sakrebulo member? .......................................................... 5 What political parties are registered for the 2014 local self-government elections? .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Secession and Survival: Nations, States and Violent Conflict by David S
    Secession and Survival: Nations, States and Violent Conflict by David S. Siroky Department of Political Science Duke University Date: Approved: Dr. Donald L. Horowitz, Supervisor Dr. David L. Banks Dr. Alexander B. Downes Dr. Bruce W. Jentleson Dr. Erik Wibbels Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 abstract (Political Science) Secession and Survival: Nations, States and Violent Conflict by David S. Siroky Department of Political Science Duke University Date: Approved: Dr. Donald L. Horowitz, Supervisor Dr. David L. Banks Dr. Alexander B. Downes Dr. Bruce W. Jentleson Dr. Erik Wibbels An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 Copyright c 2009 by David S. Siroky All rights reserved Abstract Secession is a watershed event not only for the new state that is created and the old state that is dissolved, but also for neighboring states, proximate ethno-political groups and major powers. This project examines the problem of violent secession- ist conflict and addresses an important debate at the intersection of comparative and international politics about the conditions under which secession is a peaceful solution to ethnic conflict. It demonstrates that secession is rarely a solution to ethnic conflict, does not assure the protection of remaining minorities and produces new forms of violence. To explain why some secessions produce peace, while others generate violence, the project develops a theoretical model of the conditions that produce internally coherent, stable and peaceful post-secessionist states rather than recursive secession (i.e., secession from a new secessionist state) or interstate dis- putes between the rump and secessionist state.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 89, 15 November 2016 2
    No. 89 15 November 2016 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN GEORGIA Special Editor: Tatia Chikhladze, Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen ■■Undecided Voters in 2016: Leaning Towards a Multi-Party System? 2 Tamar Iakobidze, Tbilisi ■■Georgia’s Parliamentary Elections—a Step Forward? 6 Tornike Zurabashvili, Tbilisi ■■Implication of Increased Anti-Western Propaganda in the Election Results 10 Teona Turashvili, Tbilisi ■■DOCUMENTATION The Results of the Georgian Parliamentary Elections 14 This publication has been produced within the Innovative Training Network “Caspian” which is funded by an MSCA grant of the European Union in the context of Horizon 2020 (Grant agreement no: 642709). This publication reflects only the authors’ views. The funding body is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 89, 15 November 2016 2 Undecided Voters in 2016: Leaning Towards a Multi-Party System? Tamar Iakobidze, Tbilisi Abstract The Georgian political party system has been marked by radical polarization between the Georgian Dream (GD) and the United National Movement (UNM) since 2012. However, the Parliamentary Elections in 2016 have shown growing indecision among voters, which indicates dissatisfaction with both GD and UNM as well as the need for a third alternative. Examining the profile of undecided voters and their behavior dur- ing the 2016 October elections gives insight into the prospects of a multi-party system in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Labour Party – Employment – Electoral Commission – Electoral Fraud – Internal Relocation 22 December 2009
    Country Advice Georgia Georgia – GEO35862 – Georgia Labour Party – Employment – Electoral Commission – Electoral fraud – Internal relocation 22 December 2009 1 Please provide information regarding the current treatment of Georgia Labour Party (GLP) members – both high profile and ordinary members. Are they targeted by the authorities/national government for persecution? Limited information on the treatment of GLP members by the government was found among the sources consulted. However, a number of sources indicate that ‘opposition activists’ more generally have been attacked and detained on various occasions. Attacks on opposition activists The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Election Observation Mission report on Georgia’s 21 May 2008 elections identifies “widespread allegations of intimidation…of candidates, party activists and state employees” during the election campaign, several of which were deemed credible. Such intimidation included “pressure on opposition supporters by local officials to desist from campaigning”. It is also reported that “[t]he post- election environment was marred by a series of violent attacks by unknown assailants on opposition activists, which took place daily between 29 May and 2 June”.1 The US Department of State human rights report on Georgia released in February 2009 similarly explains that “[u]nknown assailants attacked members of the political opposition before and after the January 5 presidential and May 18 parliamentary elections…[and that] [u]nknown assailants also physically assaulted opposition figures at other times during the year”. In addition, the report highlights problems experienced by “politically active persons who were not members of the ruling party”, including “selective prosecution for corruption”.2 An article from Eurasia Insight dated 13 August 2009 identifies “a disturbing pattern of arrests, beatings and kidnappings involving opposition members and supporters [which] has developed in Georgia over the past four months”.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: Parliamentary Elections November 2003
    GEORGIA: PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 2003 Report by Hans Dieset NORDEM Report 07/2004 Copyright: the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights/NORDEM and author(s). NORDEM, the Norwegian Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights, is a programme of the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (NCHR), and has as its main objective to actively promote international human rights. NORDEM is jointly administered by NCHR and the Norwegian Refugee Council. NORDEM works mainly in relation to multilateral institutions. The operative mandate of the programme is realised primarily through the recruitment and deployment of qualified Norwegian personnel to international assignments, which promote democratisation and respect for human rights. The programme is responsible for the training of personnel before deployment, reporting on completed assignments, and plays a role in research related to areas of active involvement. The vast majority of assignments are channelled through the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. NORDEM Report is a series of reports documenting NORDEM activities and is published jointly by NORDEM and the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights. Series editor: Siri Skåre Series consultants: Hege Mørk, Gry Kval, Christian Boe Astrup The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher(s). ISSN: 1503–1330 ISBN: 82–90851–75–8 NORDEM Report is available online at: http://www.humanrights.uio.no/forskning/publ/publikasjonsliste.html Preface On 31 March 2003, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human rights (ODIHR) received a formal invitation from Georgian authorities to observe the November 2003 parliamentary elections. Upon this invitation, the OSCE/ODHIR deployed a Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) to Georgia in June 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on ELECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION Approved by The
    Strasbourg, 8 October 2020 CDL-AD(2020)025 Opinion No. 913/2018 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) REPORT ON ELECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION Approved by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 68th meeting (online, 15 June 2020) and adopted by the Venice Commission at its 124th Plenary Session (online, 8-9 October 2020) on the basis of comments by Mr Eirik HOLMØYVIK (Substitute member, Norway) Mr Oliver KASK (Member, Estonia) Ms Katharina PABEL (Substitute member, Austria) Mr José Luis VARGAS VALDEZ (Substitute member, Mexico) Mr Samuele DOMINIONI (Expert, Italy) Mr Serhii KALCHENKO (Expert, Ukraine) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Restricted document. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2020)025 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. General remarks ........................................................................................................... 4 III. International instruments and case-law ......................................................................... 6 A. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ................................................... 6 B. European Convention on Human Rights .................................................................... 6 C. Code of good practice in electoral matters ................................................................. 7 D. OSCE 1990 Copenhagen Document and
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNET OWNERSHIP in GEORGIA Author: Salome Tsetskhladze
    INTERNET OWNERSHIP IN GEORGIA Author: Salome Tsetskhladze Contributor: Rusa Machaidze Co-author and research supervisor: Mamuka Andguladze The publication was prepared with the financial support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Transparency International Georgia bears the sole responsibility for the content of this report. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. CONTENTS Introduction _________________________________________________________ 4 Overview ___________________________________________________________ 5 Protection of Personal Data _______________________________________ 10 Open Net Project ___________________________________________________ 11 What the project involved ____________________________________________ 11 Project Funding ______________________________________________________ 12 Market Oligopoly and Largest Internet Operators _______________ 14 Ownership of Internet Operators ________________________________ 19 Magticom ____________________________________________________________ 20 Silknet ______________________________________________________________ 20 Akhali Kselebi ______________________________________________________ 22 Skytel _______________________________________________________________ 23 Georgianairlink ______________________________________________________ 24 Global Erti ___________________________________________________________ 25 Ordunet ______________________________________________________________ 25 Trialeti-Net
    [Show full text]