Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report Geotechnical Environmental Water Resources Ecological Final Remedial Investigation Report Fulton Municipal Works Former Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site Brooklyn, New York Order on Consent Site No. 224051 Index No. A2-0552-0606 Submitted to: Submitted by: National Grid GEI Consultants, Inc. One MetroTech Center 455 Winding Brook Drive Brooklyn, NY 11201 Glastonbury, CT 06033 860-368-5300 July 2012 Project 093020-1-1110 _____________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP Vice President FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Qualified Environmental Professional’s Certification I, David B. Terry, certify that I am currently a Qualified Environmental Professional as defined in 6 NYCRR Part 375 and that this Report was prepared in accordance with applicable statues and regulations and in substantial conformance with the DER Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation (DER-10) and that all activities were performed in accordance with the DER-approved work plans and DER-approved work plan modifications as discussed in this Report. Date: July 6, 2012 _____________________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP GEI Consultants, Inc. i FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms viii Executive Summary xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Remedial Investigation Objectives and Scope 2 1.2 Site Description 5 1.2.1 Fulton MGP and RI Study Area History 5 1.2.1.1 Pre-MGP History 5 1.2.1.2 MGP History 6 1.2.1.3 Potential Sources in the Study Area 8 1.2.1.4 Gowanus Canal 8 1.2.1.5 Post-MGP Operation Land Use 11 1.2.2 Surrounding Property Use 14 1.3 Physical and Environmental Setting 15 1.3.1 Regional Geology 16 1.3.2 Regional Hydrogeology 17 1.3.3 Regional Water Use 18 1.3.4 Local Water Use 18 1.4 Environmental Records, Fulton MGP Parcels 19 1.4.1 Fulton MGP Parcels 20 1.4.1.1 Parcel I 20 1.4.1.2 Parcel III 20 1.4.1.3 Parcel V 20 1.4.2 Off-Site Parcels 21 1.4.2.1 Parcel VI 22 1.4.2.2 267 Douglass Street 22 1.4.2.3 510 Sackett Street (Former Bayside Fuel Oil Depot) 22 1.4.2.4 318 Nevins Street [Verizon Property] 23 1.5 Previous Investigations 24 1.5.1 NYSDEC Site Characterization-September 2007 24 1.5.2 Gowanus Canal Investigations 24 1.5.2.1 KeySpan Gowanus Canal Investigation 2009 24 1.5.2.2 USEPA Gowanus Canal Investigation 2011 26 2. Remedial Investigation Methods 28 2.1 Subsurface Utility and Former Structure Location 29 2.2 Surface Soil Sampling 29 2.3 Subsurface Explorations and Sample Collection 30 ii FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 2.3.1 Test Pit Excavations 30 2.3.2 Soil Boring Installation 31 2.4 Monitoring Well Installation 33 2.5 Air Monitoring 34 2.6 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling 35 2.6.1 Depth-to-Water Measurements and NAPL Gauging 35 2.6.2 Groundwater Sampling 36 2.7 Hydraulic Conductivity Testing 37 2.8 Soil Vapor Sampling 37 2.9 Indoor Air Sampling 39 2.10 Ambient (Outdoor) Air Sampling 39 2.11 Data Validation and Management 40 2.12 Survey 40 3. Site Geology and Hydrogeology 41 3.1 Geology 41 3.1.1 Fill 41 3.1.2 Alluvial/Marsh Deposits 42 3.1.3 Glacial Deposits 42 3.1.4 Gardiners Clay 43 3.1.5 Jameco Gravel 43 3.1.6 Fordham Gneiss 43 3.2 Site Hydrogeology 44 3.2.1 Upper Glacial Aquifer 45 3.2.1.1 Upper Glacial Aquifer – Shallow (Water Table) Zone 45 3.2.1.2 Upper Glacial Aquifer – Intermediate Zone 48 3.2.1.3 Upper Glacial Aquifer – Deep Zone 50 3.2.1.4 Jameco Aquifer 50 3.2.2 Vertical Head Potentials 51 4. Nature and Extent 54 4.1 Soil 57 4.1.1 Surface Soils 58 4.1.2 Subsurface Soils 60 4.1.2.1 Parcel I 60 4.1.2.2 Parcel II 65 4.1.2.3 Parcel III 71 4.1.2.4 Parcel IV 73 4.1.2.5 Parcel V 75 4.1.2.6 Parcel VI 77 4.1.2.7 Parcel VII 80 4.1.2.8 Parcel VIII (West of Gowanus Canal) 82 4.1.3 Lateral Extent Delineation 84 iii FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 4.1.3.1 Northern Extent 84 4.1.3.2 Southern Extent 84 4.1.3.3 Eastern Extent 85 4.1.3.4 Western Extent (West Side of Gowanus Canal) 85 4.2 Groundwater Analytical Results 89 4.2.1 Shallow Groundwater Zone 89 4.2.2 Intermediate Groundwater 92 4.2.3 Deep Groundwater Zone 93 4.2.4 Jameco Aquifer 94 4.3 Soil Vapor, Indoor Air, and Ambient Air (Outdoor) Analytical Results 95 4.3.1 Parcel I 95 4.3.2 Parcel II 96 4.3.3 Parcel III 96 4.3.4 Parcel IV 98 4.3.5 Parcel V 98 4.4 NAPL 100 5. Fate and Transport 101 5.1 NAPL 101 5.1.1 Parcel I 103 5.1.2 Parcel II and Adjacent Street ROWs 103 5.1.3 Parcel III and Parcel IV 104 5.1.4 Parcel VI 104 5.1.5 Borings Adjacent to Gowanus Canal Bulkheads 104 5.2 Surface Soil 105 5.3 Subsurface Soil 106 5.4 Groundwater 108 5.5 Soil Vapor 109 6. Qualitative Human Health Exposure Assessment (QHHEA) 110 6.1 Exposure Pathways 110 6.2 Surface Soils 111 6.3 Subsurface Soils 112 6.4 Groundwater 113 6.5 Soil Vapor 114 6.6 Indoor Air 114 6.7 QHHEA Discussion 115 6.7.1 Summary of Potential Exposure Pathways 115 6.7.2 Surface soils 118 6.7.3 Subsurface Soils 119 6.7.4 Groundwater 119 6.7.5 Soil Vapor 120 6.7.6 Indoor Air 120 6.8 QHHEA Summary 120 iv FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 7. Fish and Wildlife Resources Impact Analysis (FWRIA) 122 7.1 Ecological Setting 122 7.2 Fish and Wildlife Resources 123 7.2.1 Terrestrial Resources 123 7.2.2 Aquatic Resources – Gowanus Canal 123 7.2.3 Freshwater and Tidal Wetlands 123 7.2.4 Fish and Wildlife Resources 124 7.2.5 Observation of Stress 124 7.2.6 Value of Habitat to Associated Fauna 124 7.2.7 Value of Resources to Humans 124 7.2.8 Applicable Fish and Wildlife Criteria and Standards 125 7.3 Exposure Pathways Analysis 125 7.3.1 Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern 125 7.3.2 Fate and Transport 125 7.3.3 Exposure Pathways 127 7.4 Conclusions 127 8. Conceptual Site Model 128 9. Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations 132 References 136 v FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Tables 1 Summary of Environmental Records 2 Detected Subsurface Soil Analytical Results Summary -KeySpan Gowanus Canal Investigation 3 Detected Subsurface Soil Analytical Results Summary -USEPA Gowanus Canal RI 4 Groundwater Analytical Results Summary - USEPA Gowanus Canal RI 5 USEPA Gowanus Canal RI Background Outdoor Air Analytical Results Summary 6 Sample Location and Collection Rationale 7 Monitoring Well Construction Data 8 Groundwater Depths and Elevations 9 Final Groundwater Parameters 10 Hydraulic Conductivity Values Summary 11 Detected Surface Soil Analytical Results Summary 12 Detected Subsurface Soil Analytical Results Summary 13 Detected Groundwater Analytical Results Summary 14 Detected Soil Vapor, Indoor and Outdoor Ambient Air Analytical Results Summary 15 Vertical Hydraulic Head Differential and Gradients 16 Typical Background Concentrations of Metals in Soil 17 Background Concentrations of PAHs in Surface Soils in New York City 18 Surface Soil Analytical Data Statistical Summary 19 Subsurface Soil Analytical Data Statistical Summary 20 Groundwater Analytical Data Statistical Summary 21 Soil Vapor Analytical Data Statistical Summary 22 Indoor Ambient Air Analytical Data Statistical Summary 23 Outdoor Ambient Air Analytical Data Statistical Summary Figures 1 Site Location Map 2 Remedial Investigation Parcel Identification Map 3 Historical MGP Structures and RI Study Area Sample Location Map 4 Land Use Summary 5 1849 Map of Site Vicinity 6 Fulton Former MGP Site Footprint Summary 7 Topography and Surface Water Features 8 Conceptual Hydrogeologic Schematic 9 Summary of Environmental Records 10 Extent of Observed Marsh Deposits 11 Geologic Cross-Sections A-A′, B-B′, and C-C′ With Physical Impacts and Analytical Summary 12 Geologic Cross-Section D-D′ and E-E′ With Physical Impacts and Analytical Summary 13 Summary of Physical Observations Elevation 0 to -25 Feet 14 Shallow Groundwater Contours at High Tide and Dissolved-Phase Groundwater Analytical Summary May 19, 2011 15 Intermediate Groundwater Contours at High Tide on May 19, 2011 and Dissolved-Phase Groundwater Analytical Summary 16 Shallow and Intermediate Groundwater Contours at Low Tide (May 19, 2011) 17 Receptor and Habitat Summary vi FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Appendices (Electronic Only) A NYSDEC Approval Letters and Field Decision Confirmation Form B Representative Site Photographs C Historical Information and Historical Study of Gowanus Canal D Environmental Records Information E Soil Boring Logs, Monitoring Well Construction Logs, and Test Pit Logs F Data Usability Summary Report and Electronic Data Deliverable G Hydraulic Conductivity Calculations H Indoor Air Sampling Information I Excavation Oversight Summary Report, 270 Nevins Street, Fulton Municipal Works Former MGP Site, Brooklyn, New York H:\WPROC\Project\KEYSPAN\FultonMGP\RI Report\Final Fulton RIR July 2012\Final Fulton RIR 6-29-12.docx vii FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Abbreviations and Acronyms AOC Administrative Order on Consent Alpha Alpha Analytical Laboratory ADT Aquifer Drilling and Testing, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center
    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn: Economic Development and the State of Its Economy
    Brooklyn: Economic Development And the State of Its Economy February 2004 New York State Office of the State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York Kenneth B. Bleiwas, Deputy Comptroller Report 12-2004 Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Office of the State Comptroller New York City Public Information Office 633 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 681-4824 Or through the Comptroller’s Web site at: www.osc.state.ny.us To help reduce printing costs, please notify the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller at (212) 383-3916 if you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list or if your address has changed. Contents I. Executive Summary..................................................................................................1 II. An Overview of the Brooklyn Economy .................................................................. 3 III. Economic Development in Brooklyn ...................................................................... 7 Major Issues Affecting Economic Development...............................................................................................................7 Waterfront Development and Zoning ................................................................................................................................8 Retail Expansion: Big Box Stores.....................................................................................................................................10 Tourism..........................................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-Term Debt Issuing Companies
    National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-term Debt Issuing Companies National Grid plc ■ National Grid’s US companies have several Moody’s / S&P / Fitch Baa1 / BBB+ / BBB+ rated issuing entities. The large number is for regulatory transparency. National Grid USA ■ The operating companies typically issue in USD Baa1 / BBB+ / - 144A or private placement format Niagara Mohawk Power KeySpan Corporation Corporation Baa1 / A - / BBB + ■ KeySpan Corporation is a legacy holding A2 / A - / - company that will not issue new debt Massachusetts Electric The Brooklyn Union Gas Company Company (KEDNY) ■ National Grid USA (NGUSA) has no long-term A3 / A - / - A2 / A - / A - debt but does have active commercial paper New England Power Company KeySpan Gas East Corporation programmes A3 / A - / - (KEDLI) A2 / A - / A - The Narragansett Electric Colonial Gas Company Company A3 / A - / - A3 / A - / - Boston Gas Company A3 / A - / - National Grid Generation LLC Baa1 / A - / - * Ratings shown are senior unsecured long-term ratings, or issuer/corporate ratings where there is no senior unsecured rating. Our US Operations Our Network ■ We both own and operate electricity transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont ■ We own and operate electricity distribution networks in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, serving approximately 3.4 million customers ■ We own and operate gas distribution networks across the northeastern US, located in upstate New York, New
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation Securities Litigation 01-CV-05852-Amended
    Case 1:01-cv-05852-ARR-MDG Document 64 Filed 04/07/2003 Page 1 of 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION CV 2001-5852 (ARR) (MDG) SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------X AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1. Lead Plaintiffs Donald Kassan and Peter E. Hubbard (“Lead Plaintiffs”), for their amended complaint against defendants, allege the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included, inter alia, a review of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, press releases and other public statements issued by KeySpan Corporation (“KeySpan” or the “Company”), securities analysts' reports and advisories by or about the Company, media and third party reports about the Company, and a review of the case file and certain discovery in the litigation styled KeySpan Services Inc. et al. v. LeRoy Kay et al., Docket No. MON-C-95-01, pending in the Chancery Court Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County (the “Monmouth County litigation”). Lead Plaintiffs in good faith believe that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 2. This amendment addresses the deficiencies found by the Court in its Opinion and Order dated March 18, 2003. Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to appeal said Order. INTRODUCTION 3. This is a federal class action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act” or “1934 Act”) on behalf of purchasers of KeySpan securities between March 24, 2000, and July 17, 2001 inclusive (the “Class Period”). As more fully set forth herein, the defendants have admitted that financial and operational improprieties had not been disclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Independent System Operator: a Ten-Year Review
    The New York Independent System Operator: A Ten-Year Review Susan F. Tierney, Ph.D. Analysis Group Boston, Massachusetts April 12, 2010 This White Paper was prepared at the request of the New York Independent System Operator. The paper reflects the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of the NYISO, or its members. www.analysisgroup.com Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 BACKGROUND: The Goals Underlying Changes in New York’s Electric Industry in the 1990s ...................................... 7 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 New York’s Electric Industry Before the Establishment of NYISO .................................................................................... 9 Impetus for Change: The Pressure of High Electricity Prices ........................................................................................... 10 Planning for NYISO ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Establishing NYISO ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
    KeySpan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 KEYSPAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditor's Report………………………………...………………..…………………..…………………….………………………………………..3 Consolidated Statements of Income………………...…………………..……………..……………………………………………………………………………………………4 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income……………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows…………….……………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………6 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheets…………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………7 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Capitalization…………………………………………………..…….…………………………………………………………………………………9 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity ………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation………………………………….………………………………………………11 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies …………………………………………………………………………………………13 3 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities ………………………..……………………...………………………………………………………22 4 - Rate Matters …………...……………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………24 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment …………………………………………………….……...………………………..………………………27 6 - Derivative Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Canal
    Public Health Assessment Final Release GOWANUS CANAL CITY OF NEW YORK BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORK EPA FACILITY ID: NYN000206222 Prepared by New York State Department of Health JANUARY 11, 2017 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Characterization Phase Iv Data Summary Report
    SITE CHARACTERIZATION PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT WORK ASSIGNMENT D004433-22 MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA KINGS (C), NY Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 625 Broadway, Albany, New York Alexander B. Grannis, Commissioner DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B URS Corporation 77 Goodell Street Buffalo, New York 14203 Final G3359U May 2009 PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT SITE CHARACTERIZATION MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE ID NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. D004433-22A PREPARED BY: URS CORPORATION 77 GOODELL STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 FINAL MAY 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Site Background ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Site Location and Description ............................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Previous Investigations.......................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Findings of Previous Phases of Site Investigation Fieldwork ............................ 1-7
    [Show full text]
  • * Nationalgrid
    -* nationalgrid The Honorable Jaclyn A. Brilling Secretary, New York Public Service Commission 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 RE: CASE 06-M-0878 -Joint Petition of National Grid PLC and KeySpan Corporation for Approval of Stock Acquisition and other Regulatory Authorizations. CASE 06-G-1185 -Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of The Brooklyn Union Gas Company d/b/a KeySpan Energy Delivery New York for Gas Service. CASE 06-G-1186 -Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as Charges, Rules and Regulations of KeySpan Gas East Energy Delivery Long Island for Gas Service. Statement of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation in Support of the Merger & Gas Revenue Reauirement Joint Provosal Dear Secretary Brilling: Enclosed for filing pursuant to Judge's Lynch's Ruling of July 5,2007 in the above-captioned proceedings please find enclosed an original and fifteen copies of the Statement of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation in Support of Merger Joint Proposal. We have also enclosed a copy of this cover letter and would please ask that you date stamp the service copy and return it to me in the enclosed prepaid, pre-addressed envelope. Respectfully s mitte OA,&~L, STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Case 06-M-0878 Joint Petition of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation for Approval of Stock Acquisition and Other Regulatory Authorizations. Case 06-6-1185 Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of The Brooklyn Union Gas Company for Gas Sewice Case 06-G-1186 Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of KeySpan Gas East Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan
    Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Queens East River and North Shore Greenway Master Plan New York City Department of City Planning New York City Department of Parks & Recreation 2006 2006 • NYC Department of Parks & Recreation Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Project PIN X500.97 The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part through funds from the U.S.Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report refl ect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area
    [Show full text]
  • Power Plants and Mercury Pollution Across the Country
    September 2005 Power Plants and Mercury Pollution Across the Country NCPIRG Education Fund Made in the U.S.A. Power Plants and Mercury Pollution Across the Country September 2005 NCPIRG Education Fund Acknowledgements Written by Supryia Ray, Clean Air Advocate with NCPIRG Education Fund. © 2005, NCPIRG Education Fund The author would like to thank Alison Cassady, Research Director at NCPIRG Education Fund, and Emily Figdor, Clean Air Advocate at NCPIRG Education Fund, for their assistance with this report. To obtain a copy of this report, visit our website or contact us at: NCPIRG Education Fund 112 S. Blount St, Ste 102 Raleigh, NC 27601 (919) 833-2070 www.ncpirg.org Made in the U.S.A. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary...............................................................................................................4 Background: Toxic Mercury Emissions from Power Plants ..................................................... 6 The Bush Administration’s Mercury Regulations ................................................................... 8 Findings: Power Plant Mercury Emissions ........................................................................... 12 Power Plant Mercury Emissions by State........................................................................ 12 Power Plant Mercury Emissions by County and Zip Code ............................................... 12 Power Plant Mercury Emissions by Facility.................................................................... 15 Power Plant Mercury Emissions by Company
    [Show full text]