DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital New Critical Services Structure New York City, Kings County, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital New Critical Services Structure New York City, Kings County, New York Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital New Critical Services Structure New York City, Kings County, New York 4085-DR-NY July, 2015 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II 26 Federal Plaza, NY, NY 10278 Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND .......................................................... 2 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................................ 3 4.1 Alternative 1: No Action Alternative ................................................................ 4 4.2 Alternative 2: Proposed Alternative: New Critical Services Structure ......... 4 4.3 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed ............................................................ 6 4.3.1 Mitigation in Place ................................................................................... 6 4.3.2 Perimeter Floodwall ................................................................................. 7 4.4 Summary of Alternatives ................................................................................... 7 5.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ................................. 7 5.1 Geology, Topography, and Soils ........................................................................ 7 5.1.1 Existing Conditions.................................................................................. 7 5.1.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................. 8 5.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 8 5.2.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 10 5.2.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 11 5.3 Wetlands and Water Quality ........................................................................... 12 5.3.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 12 5.3.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 13 5.4 Floodplain .......................................................................................................... 13 5.4.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 14 5.4.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 15 5.5 Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 15 5.5.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 16 5.5.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 16 5.6 Wildlife and Fish ............................................................................................... 17 5.6.1 Endangered and Threatened Species ..................................................... 17 5.6.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ..................................................................... 17 5.6.3 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .................................................. 17 5.6.4 Essential Fish Habitat ............................................................................ 18 5.6.5 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 18 5.6.6 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 21 5.7 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 21 5.7.1 Historic (Standing) Structures ............................................................... 22 5.7.2 Archaeological Resources ...................................................................... 25 5.8 Aesthetic Resources .......................................................................................... 27 5.8.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 28 5.8.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 28 5.9 Socioeconomic Resources and Environmental Justice .................................. 28 5.9.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 28 5.9.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 29 5.10 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................... 30 5.10.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 30 ii Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital 5.10.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 30 5.11 Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 31 5.11.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 31 5.11.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 31 5.12 Noise ................................................................................................................... 32 5.12.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 33 5.12.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 33 5.13 Transportation .................................................................................................. 34 5.13.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 34 5.13.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 35 5.14 Public Health and Safety .................................................................................. 36 5.14.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 36 5.14.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 36 5.15 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 36 5.15.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 36 5.15.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 37 5.16 Climate Change ................................................................................................. 38 5.16.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................ 39 5.16.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................... 39 5.17 Cumulative Impacts .......................................................................................... 40 6.0 PERMITS AND PROJECT CONDITIONS ............................................................... 42 7.0 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT.............................. 44 8.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 46 9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................. 46 10.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS .......................................................................................... 47 11.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 52 iii Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Documents Document 5.2-1 Air Title V Facility Permit Document 5.4-1 8-Step Floodplain Decision Making Notice Document 5.4-2 Hydrology and Hydraulics Document 5.7-1 U.S. Department of the Interior Correspondence APPENDIX B: Figures Figure 1-1 Project Location Map Figure 1-2 Existing Campus Layout Figure 4-1 Proposed Alternative Figure 5.1-1 SSURGO Soils Figure 5.3-1 NWI Wetlands Figure 5.3-2 NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Figure 5.4-1 FEMA Preliminary Flood Hazard Areas Figure 5.5-1 NYC Coastal Zone Boundary Figure 5.6-1 Photograph Key Figure 5.6-2 Natural Resources Photographs Figure 5.10-1 Community of Concern – Environmental Justice Study Area Figure 5.11-1 Existing Land Use Figure 5.13-1 Transportation APPENDIX C: Tables Table 5.2-1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Table 5.2-2 Representative Monitored Ambient Air Quality Data Table 5.6-1 Vegetation Identified within the Project Site iv Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital Table 5.7-1 New York State Breeding Bird Atlas (2000-2005) Results for Block 5849C APPENDIX D: Correspondence Correspondence 5.7-1 New York State Historic Preservation Office Consultation v Environmental Assessment HHC Coney Island Hospital LIST OF ACRONYMS APE – Area of Potential Effects BFE – Base Flood Elevation NYCBSA – New York City Board of Standards and Appeals CAA – Clean Air Act CEHA – Coastal Erosion Hazard Area CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality CFR – Code of Federal Regulations CHASP – Construction-Related Health and Safety Plan CIH – Coney Island Hospital CO – Carbon monoxide COC – Community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center
    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report
    Geotechnical Environmental Water Resources Ecological Final Remedial Investigation Report Fulton Municipal Works Former Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site Brooklyn, New York Order on Consent Site No. 224051 Index No. A2-0552-0606 Submitted to: Submitted by: National Grid GEI Consultants, Inc. One MetroTech Center 455 Winding Brook Drive Brooklyn, NY 11201 Glastonbury, CT 06033 860-368-5300 July 2012 Project 093020-1-1110 _____________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP Vice President FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Qualified Environmental Professional’s Certification I, David B. Terry, certify that I am currently a Qualified Environmental Professional as defined in 6 NYCRR Part 375 and that this Report was prepared in accordance with applicable statues and regulations and in substantial conformance with the DER Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation (DER-10) and that all activities were performed in accordance with the DER-approved work plans and DER-approved work plan modifications as discussed in this Report. Date: July 6, 2012 _____________________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP GEI Consultants, Inc. i FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms viii Executive Summary xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Remedial Investigation Objectives and Scope 2 1.2 Site Description 5 1.2.1 Fulton MGP and RI Study Area History 5 1.2.1.1 Pre-MGP History 5 1.2.1.2 MGP History
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn: Economic Development and the State of Its Economy
    Brooklyn: Economic Development And the State of Its Economy February 2004 New York State Office of the State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York Kenneth B. Bleiwas, Deputy Comptroller Report 12-2004 Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Office of the State Comptroller New York City Public Information Office 633 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 681-4824 Or through the Comptroller’s Web site at: www.osc.state.ny.us To help reduce printing costs, please notify the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller at (212) 383-3916 if you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list or if your address has changed. Contents I. Executive Summary..................................................................................................1 II. An Overview of the Brooklyn Economy .................................................................. 3 III. Economic Development in Brooklyn ...................................................................... 7 Major Issues Affecting Economic Development...............................................................................................................7 Waterfront Development and Zoning ................................................................................................................................8 Retail Expansion: Big Box Stores.....................................................................................................................................10 Tourism..........................................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-Term Debt Issuing Companies
    National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-term Debt Issuing Companies National Grid plc ■ National Grid’s US companies have several Moody’s / S&P / Fitch Baa1 / BBB+ / BBB+ rated issuing entities. The large number is for regulatory transparency. National Grid USA ■ The operating companies typically issue in USD Baa1 / BBB+ / - 144A or private placement format Niagara Mohawk Power KeySpan Corporation Corporation Baa1 / A - / BBB + ■ KeySpan Corporation is a legacy holding A2 / A - / - company that will not issue new debt Massachusetts Electric The Brooklyn Union Gas Company Company (KEDNY) ■ National Grid USA (NGUSA) has no long-term A3 / A - / - A2 / A - / A - debt but does have active commercial paper New England Power Company KeySpan Gas East Corporation programmes A3 / A - / - (KEDLI) A2 / A - / A - The Narragansett Electric Colonial Gas Company Company A3 / A - / - A3 / A - / - Boston Gas Company A3 / A - / - National Grid Generation LLC Baa1 / A - / - * Ratings shown are senior unsecured long-term ratings, or issuer/corporate ratings where there is no senior unsecured rating. Our US Operations Our Network ■ We both own and operate electricity transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont ■ We own and operate electricity distribution networks in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, serving approximately 3.4 million customers ■ We own and operate gas distribution networks across the northeastern US, located in upstate New York, New
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation Securities Litigation 01-CV-05852-Amended
    Case 1:01-cv-05852-ARR-MDG Document 64 Filed 04/07/2003 Page 1 of 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION CV 2001-5852 (ARR) (MDG) SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------X AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1. Lead Plaintiffs Donald Kassan and Peter E. Hubbard (“Lead Plaintiffs”), for their amended complaint against defendants, allege the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included, inter alia, a review of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, press releases and other public statements issued by KeySpan Corporation (“KeySpan” or the “Company”), securities analysts' reports and advisories by or about the Company, media and third party reports about the Company, and a review of the case file and certain discovery in the litigation styled KeySpan Services Inc. et al. v. LeRoy Kay et al., Docket No. MON-C-95-01, pending in the Chancery Court Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County (the “Monmouth County litigation”). Lead Plaintiffs in good faith believe that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 2. This amendment addresses the deficiencies found by the Court in its Opinion and Order dated March 18, 2003. Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to appeal said Order. INTRODUCTION 3. This is a federal class action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act” or “1934 Act”) on behalf of purchasers of KeySpan securities between March 24, 2000, and July 17, 2001 inclusive (the “Class Period”). As more fully set forth herein, the defendants have admitted that financial and operational improprieties had not been disclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Independent System Operator: a Ten-Year Review
    The New York Independent System Operator: A Ten-Year Review Susan F. Tierney, Ph.D. Analysis Group Boston, Massachusetts April 12, 2010 This White Paper was prepared at the request of the New York Independent System Operator. The paper reflects the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of the NYISO, or its members. www.analysisgroup.com Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 BACKGROUND: The Goals Underlying Changes in New York’s Electric Industry in the 1990s ...................................... 7 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 New York’s Electric Industry Before the Establishment of NYISO .................................................................................... 9 Impetus for Change: The Pressure of High Electricity Prices ........................................................................................... 10 Planning for NYISO ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Establishing NYISO ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
    KeySpan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 KEYSPAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditor's Report………………………………...………………..…………………..…………………….………………………………………..3 Consolidated Statements of Income………………...…………………..……………..……………………………………………………………………………………………4 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income……………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows…………….……………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………6 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheets…………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………7 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Capitalization…………………………………………………..…….…………………………………………………………………………………9 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity ………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation………………………………….………………………………………………11 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies …………………………………………………………………………………………13 3 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities ………………………..……………………...………………………………………………………22 4 - Rate Matters …………...……………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………24 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment …………………………………………………….……...………………………..………………………27 6 - Derivative Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Canal
    Public Health Assessment Final Release GOWANUS CANAL CITY OF NEW YORK BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORK EPA FACILITY ID: NYN000206222 Prepared by New York State Department of Health JANUARY 11, 2017 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Characterization Phase Iv Data Summary Report
    SITE CHARACTERIZATION PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT WORK ASSIGNMENT D004433-22 MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA KINGS (C), NY Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 625 Broadway, Albany, New York Alexander B. Grannis, Commissioner DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B URS Corporation 77 Goodell Street Buffalo, New York 14203 Final G3359U May 2009 PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT SITE CHARACTERIZATION MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE ID NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. D004433-22A PREPARED BY: URS CORPORATION 77 GOODELL STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 FINAL MAY 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Site Background ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Site Location and Description ............................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Previous Investigations.......................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Findings of Previous Phases of Site Investigation Fieldwork ............................ 1-7
    [Show full text]
  • * Nationalgrid
    -* nationalgrid The Honorable Jaclyn A. Brilling Secretary, New York Public Service Commission 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 RE: CASE 06-M-0878 -Joint Petition of National Grid PLC and KeySpan Corporation for Approval of Stock Acquisition and other Regulatory Authorizations. CASE 06-G-1185 -Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of The Brooklyn Union Gas Company d/b/a KeySpan Energy Delivery New York for Gas Service. CASE 06-G-1186 -Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as Charges, Rules and Regulations of KeySpan Gas East Energy Delivery Long Island for Gas Service. Statement of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation in Support of the Merger & Gas Revenue Reauirement Joint Provosal Dear Secretary Brilling: Enclosed for filing pursuant to Judge's Lynch's Ruling of July 5,2007 in the above-captioned proceedings please find enclosed an original and fifteen copies of the Statement of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation in Support of Merger Joint Proposal. We have also enclosed a copy of this cover letter and would please ask that you date stamp the service copy and return it to me in the enclosed prepaid, pre-addressed envelope. Respectfully s mitte OA,&~L, STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Case 06-M-0878 Joint Petition of National Grid plc and KeySpan Corporation for Approval of Stock Acquisition and Other Regulatory Authorizations. Case 06-6-1185 Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of The Brooklyn Union Gas Company for Gas Sewice Case 06-G-1186 Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of KeySpan Gas East Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan
    Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Queens East River and North Shore Greenway Master Plan New York City Department of City Planning New York City Department of Parks & Recreation 2006 2006 • NYC Department of Parks & Recreation Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Project PIN X500.97 The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part through funds from the U.S.Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report refl ect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area
    [Show full text]