DOCSLIB.ORG

Bioblitz Cumulative Species Report 2011 & 2012, with 2013 Edits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bioblitz Cumulative Species Report 2011 & 2012, with 2013 Edits Bioblitz Cumulative Species Report 2011 & 2012, with 2013 edits In collaboration with the University Museum of Zoology and conservation partners across Cambridge, the Botanic Garden has held Bioblitz events in 2011 and 2012, during which experts and the visiting public have joined forces to discover, identify and record species resident or passing through. The Botanic Garden is a habitat actively managed for wildlife and this Bioblitz species list, though not absolutely comprehensive, gives the clearest picture we have of the species present in the Garden at mid-summer (Bioblitz 2011 was held in July, Bioblitz 2012 in June). The plants included in this list are those that have introduced themselves or self-seeded, rather than those that have been deliberately cultivated under the Garden’s collections policy. New species recorded in 2012 are highlighted. Additional identifications of molluscs observed at the Garden were made by Chris du Feu in December 2013, in orange. ANIMALS: vertebrates AMPHIBIA (amphibians) Bufo bufo Common toad Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth newt Rana temporaria Common frog Triturus cristatus* Great crested newt AVES (birds) Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Apus apus Swift Ardea cinerea Grey Heron Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch Carduelis chloris Greenfinch Certhia familiaris Treecreeper Columba oenas Stock Dove Columba palumbus Woodpigeon Corvus corone Carrion Crow Delichon urbicum House Martin Dendrocopos major Great Spotted Woodpecker Erithacus rubecula Robin Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch Gallinula chloropus Moorhen Garrulus glandarius Jay Larus fuscus Lesser Black-backed Gull Parus ater Coal Tit 1 Parus caeruleus Blue Tit Parus major Great Tit AVES (birds) continued….. Phasianus colchicus Common pheasant Phylloscopus collybita Chiffchaff Pica pica Magpie Picus viridis Green Woodpecker Prunella modularis Dunnock Regulus regulus Goldcrest Streptopelia decaocto Collared Dove Strix aluco Tawny Owl Sylvia atricapilla Blackcap Troglodytes troglodytes Wren Turdus merula Blackbird Turdus philomelos Song Thrush CHORDATA (fish) Gasterosteus aculeatus Three-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius Ten-pined stickleback Rutilus rutilus Roach Scardinius erythropthalmus Rudd MAMMALIA (mammals) Apodemus sylvaticus Wood mouse Meles meles Badger Muntiacus muntjak Muntjac Myodes glareolus Bank vole Myotis daubentonii Daubenton’s bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus Common pipistrelle bat Pipistrellus pygmaeus Soprano pipistrelle bat Vulpes vulpes Fox REPTILIA (reptiles) Natrix natrix Grass snake ANIMALS: invertebrates CHELICERATA: ARACHNIDA (spiders and harvestmen) Anelosimus vittatus Comb-footed spider Anyphaena accentuata Buzzing spider Araneus diadematus Garden spider Araniella cucurbitina Green orb spider Atea sturmi Orb web spider Clubiona brevipes Clubiona comta Sac spider Clubiona pallidula Diaea dorsata Green crab spider Dicranopalpus ramosus Harvestman Enoplognatha ovata Comb-footed or candystripe spider Gibbaranea gibbosa Orb spider Lepthyphantes tenibricola Lepthyphantes tenuis Money spider 2 Linyphia triangularis Hammock web spider CHELICERATA: ARACHNIDA (spiders and harvestmen) continued ... Meta segmentata Orb spider Mitopus morio Harvestman Nigma walckenaeri Green cribellate spider Opilio canestrinii Harvestman Opilio saxatilis Harvestman Paidiscura pallens Pardosa pullata Common wolf spider Phalangium opilio Harvestman Philodromus albidus Philodromus aureolus Running crab spider Philodromus collinus Philodromus praedatus Pisaura mirablis Nursery web spider Salticus scenicus Zebra spider Tetragnatha montana Shadow stretch spider Theridion impressum Theridion sisyphium Comb-footed spider Theridion tinctum Trochosa terricola Wolf spider Xysticus cristatus Crab spider Zelotes pedestris Zygiella atrica Orb web spider CRUSTACEA Amphipoda Gammarus Freshwater shrimp Cladocera Species unidentified Water flea Colembola Orchesella sp. Springtail Isopoda Armadillidium depressum Southern pill woodlouse Armadillidium vulgare Common pill woodlouse Asellus aquaticus Water hoglouse Oniscus assellus Common shiny woodlouse Philoscia muscorum Common striped woodlouse HEXAPODA: INSECTA (Insects) Coleoptera (beetles) Acilius sulcatus Water beetle Adalia 10-punctata 10 spot ladybird Adalia 2-punctata 2 spot ladybird Amara convexior Ground beetle Amara familiaris Ground beetle Badister bullata Ground beetle Bembidion lampros Ground beetle Brachypterus urticae Nettle pollen beetle Carabus violaceus Violet ground beetle 3 Ceutorhynchus pollinarius Weevil Chrysolina americana Rosemary beetle Coccinella septem-punctuata 7-spot ladybird Diaperis boleti Darkling beetle Dysticus Diving beetle Harmonia 4-punctata Cream-streaked ladybird Harmonia axyridis Harlequin ladybird Hister unicolor Clown beetle Lagria hirta Darkling beetle Loricera pilicornis Ground beetle Mycetophagus quadropustu- latus Fungus beetle Nebria brevicollis Ground beetle Notiophilus biguttatus Ground beetle Oedemera nobilis Thick-kneed flower beetle Ophonus rufibarbis Ground beetle Oulma melanopa Ceral leaf beetle Platydracus stercorarius Rove beetle Pogonocherus hispidus Lesser thorn-tipped longhorn beetle Pogonocherus fasciculatus Pine longhorn beetle Propylea 14-punctata 14-spot ladybird Psyllobora 22-punctata 22-spot ladybird Pterostichus madidus Ground beetle Rhagonycha fulva Soldier Beetle Silpha atrata Burying beetle Subcoccinella 24-punctata 24-spot ladybird Diving Beetle Whirligig Beetle Dermaptera (earwigs) Forficula auricula Common earwig Diptera (true flies) Coremacera tristis Snail-killing fly Diplonevra pilosell Scuttle fly Episyrphus balteatus Marmalade hoverfly Megaselia basispinata Scuttle fly Megaselia brevicostalis Scuttle fly Megaselia emarginata Scuttle fly Megaselia pusilla Scuttle fly Merodon equestris validus Large blub fly Syrphus ribesii Hoverfly Volucella inanis Hornet hoverfly Volucella zonaria Hornet hoverfly Ephemeroptera (mayflies) Chloeon Mayfly and mayfly nymphs Hemiptera-auchenorrhyncha (hoppers) Agalia consorbrina Leafhopper Anoscopus serratulae Leafhopper Aphrophora alni Alder spittlebug Cicadula frontalis Leafhopper 4 Cicadula quadrinotata Leafhopper Hemiptera-auchenorrhyncha (hoppers) continued …. Cicadula frontalis Leafhopper Cicadula quadrinotata Leafhopper Eupteryx aurata Leafhopper Eupteryx melissae Leafhopper Eupteryx urticae Leafhopper Euryhadnia pulchella Leafhopper Hyledelphax elegantula Planthopper Juvesella pellucida Planthopper Lamprotettix nitidulus Leafhopper Neophilaenus lineatus Froghopper Philaenus spumaris Common froghopper Hemiptera-heteroptera (true bugs) Acanthosoma haemorrhoi- dale Hawthorn shieldbug Aelia acuminate Bishop's mitre Coreus marginatus Squash bug Corixidae sp Lesser water boatman Dolycoris baccarum Sloe bug Elasmucha grisea Parent bug Empicoris vagabundus Assassin bug Gerris lacustris Pond skater Heterogaster urticae Nettle ground bug Heterotoma planicornis Mirid bug Himacers mirmicoides Ant damsel bug Liocoris tripustulatus Mirid bug Lygocoris pabulinus Common green capsid bug Notonecta glauca Greater Water Boatman Palomena prasina Green Shieldbug Pentatoma rufipes Forest bug Water Boatman Hemiptera-sternorrhyncha (aphids, psyllids and allies) Psyla alni Alder psyllid Trioza urticae Nettle psyllid Hymenoptera (bees and wasps) Anthidium mancatum Wool carder bee Bombus hortorum Garden bumblebee Bombus hypnorum Tree bumblebee Bombus lapidarius Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus lucorum White-tailed bumblebee Bombus pascuorum Common carder bee Bombus pratorum Early bumblebee Bombus terrestris Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus vestalis Cuckoo bumblebee Dolichovespula sylvestris Tree wasp Species unidentified Sawfly 5 Lepidoptera: butterflies Cynthia cardui Painted lady Inarchis io Peacock Maniola jurtina Meadow brown Pararge aegeria Speckled wood Pieris brassicae Large white Pieris napi Green-veined white Pieris rapae Small White Polygonia c-album Comma Pyronia tithonus Gatekeeper Thymelicus sylvestris Small skipper Vanessa atalanta Red admiral Lepidoptera: moths Abrostola tripartita The spectacle Acronicta psi/tridens Grey/ dark dagger Acronicta rumicis Knot grass Agrotis clavis Heart and club Agrotis exclamationis Heart and dart Agrotis puta Shuttle-shaped dart Apamea monoglypha Dark arches Autographa gamma Silver Y Biston betularia Peppered moth Bupalus piniaria Bordered white Cameraria ohridella Horse chestnut leaf miner moth Cosmia trapezina The dun-bar Cucullia verbasci Mullein moth Deilephila elpenor Elephant hawk moth Diarsia mendica Ingrailed clay Dioryctria abietella no common name Discestra trifolii The nutmeg Eilema griseola Dingy footman Furcula bifida Poplar kitten Hepialus lupulinus Common swift Hoplodrina alsines The uncertain Hylaea fasciaria Barred red Idaea aversata Riband wave Laothoe populi Poplar hawk moth Lozotaeniodes formosanus no common name Mesapamea secalis Common rustic Mythimna conigera Brown-line bright-eye Mythimna pallens Common wainscot Noctua comes Lesser yellow underwing Noctua fimbriata Broad bordered yellow underwing Lesser broad-bordered yellow under- Noctua janthe wing Noctua pronuba Large yellow underwing Ochropleura plecta Flame shoulder Oligia strigilis Marbled minor 6 Paradrina clavipalpis Pale mottled willow Lepidoptera: moths continued …. Pheosia tremula Swallow prominent Plagodis dolabraria Scorched wing Platyptilia gonodactyla Triangle plume Thera britannica Spruce carpet Neuroptera (lacewings and allies) Chrysopa septempunctata Green lacewing Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) Aeshna cyanea Southern hawker Aeshna
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers: the Diversity and Evolution of Manipulative Strategies in Host–Parasite Interactions
    CHAPTER 3 Invasion of the Body Snatchers: The Diversity and Evolution of Manipulative Strategies in Host–Parasite Interactions † Thierry Lefe`vre,* Shelley A. Adamo, ‡ David G. Biron, Dorothe´e Misse´,* § k } David Hughes, , ,1 and Fre´de´ric Thomas*, ,1 Contents 3.1. Introduction 46 3.2. How Parasites Alter Host Behaviour 49 3.2.1. Parasitic effects on host neural function 49 3.2.2. Proteomics and proximate mechanisms 56 3.3. A Co-Evolutionary Perspective 66 3.3.1. Exploiting host-compensatory responses 66 3.2.2. Facultative virulence 72 3.4. The (River) Blind Watchmaker 75 3.5. Concluding Remarks 76 References 76 Abstract Parasite-induced alteration of host behaviour is a widespread trans- mission strategy among pathogens. Understanding how it works is an exciting challenge from both a mechanistic and an evolutionary perspective. In this review, we use key examples to examine the * Ge´ne´tique et Evolution des Maladies Infectieuses, UMR CNRS/IRD 2724, Montpellier, France { Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada { PIAF, UMR 547 INRA/Universite´ Blaise-Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France § Department of Organismal Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA } Institut de recherche en biologie ve´ge´tale, De´partement de sciences biologiques Universite´ de Montre´al, Montre´al, Que´bec, Canada k School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 1 Both authors contributed equally Advances in Parasitology, Volume 68 # 2009 Elsevier Ltd. ISSN 0065-308X, DOI: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)00603-9 All rights reserved. 45 46 Thierry Lefe`vre et al. proximate mechanisms by which parasites are known to control the behaviour of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf
    104 Species 55 Mollusc 8 Mollusc 334 Species 181 Mollusc 28 Mollusc 44 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 45 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 269 Species 149 Vascular Plant 84 Flowering Plant 13 Species 7 Mollusc 1 Mollusc 42 Species 21 Mollusc 2 Mollusc 43 Species 22 Mollusc 3 Mollusc 59 Species 30 Mollusc 4 Mollusc 59 Species 31 Mollusc 5 Mollusc 68 Species 36 Mollusc 6 Mollusc 81 Species 43 Mollusc 7 Mollusc 105 Species 56 Mollusc 9 Mollusc 117 Species 63 Mollusc 10 Mollusc 118 Species 64 Mollusc 11 Mollusc 119 Species 65 Mollusc 12 Mollusc 124 Species 68 Mollusc 13 Mollusc 125 Species 69 Mollusc 14 Mollusc 145 Species 81 Mollusc 15 Mollusc 150 Species 84 Mollusc 16 Mollusc 151 Species 85 Mollusc 17 Mollusc 152 Species 86 Mollusc 18 Mollusc 158 Species 90 Mollusc 19 Mollusc 184 Species 105 Mollusc 20 Mollusc 185 Species 106 Mollusc 21 Mollusc 186 Species 107 Mollusc 22 Mollusc 191 Species 110 Mollusc 23 Mollusc 245 Species 136 Mollusc 24 Mollusc 267 Species 148 Mollusc 25 Mollusc 270 Species 150 Mollusc 26 Mollusc 333 Species 180 Mollusc 27 Mollusc 347 Species 189 Mollusc 29 Mollusc 349 Species 191 Mollusc 30 Mollusc 365 Species 196 Mollusc 31 Mollusc 376 Species 203 Mollusc 32 Mollusc 377 Species 204 Mollusc 33 Mollusc 378 Species 205 Mollusc 34 Mollusc 379 Species 206 Mollusc 35 Mollusc 404 Species 221 Mollusc 36 Mollusc 414 Species 228 Mollusc 37 Mollusc 415 Species 229 Mollusc 38 Mollusc 416 Species 230 Mollusc 39 Mollusc 417 Species 231 Mollusc 40 Mollusc 418 Species 232 Mollusc 41 Mollusc 419 Species 233
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo Y Atlas De Las Arañas De La Familia Philodromidae Thorell, 1870 De La Península Iberica E Islas Baleares
    Graellsia, 51: 55-81 (1995) CATÁLOGO Y ATLAS DE LAS ARAÑAS DE LA FAMILIA PHILODROMIDAE THORELL, 1870 DE LA PENÍNSULA IBERICA E ISLAS BALEARES C. Urones (*) RESUMEN En este artículo se da el listado de las 38 especies de Philodromidae (Araneae) cono- cidas en la Península Ibérica y Baleares. La lista ordenada alfabéticamente, se presenta indicando las localidades por provincias y referencias bibliográficas donde se ha citado cada especie. Se incluye el material existente en la colección del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid, así como ejemplares de Philodromidae de otras proce- dencias. Se da el atlas provisional de distribución de las especies de Philodromidae para España peninsular e islas Baleares, y para Portugal y Andorra. La distribución de cada especie se indica sobre mapas de cuadrícula U.T.M. de 50 km de lado. Y se aportan ade- más datos sobre su hábitat y ciclos de vida. Palabras clave: Arañas, Araneae, Philodromidae, Distribución Geográfica, España, Portugal ABSTRACT Catalogue and atlas of the Spider Family Philodromidae Thorell, 1870 of Iberian Peninsule and Balearic Islands A check-list of 38 species of Philodromidae found in Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands is given. The list, in alphabetic order, contains the provinces and bibliographic references where the species are cited. The material of Philodromidae from the “Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales in Madrid” has been studied, also several exemplars are examined. The provisional atlas of distribution of the species the Philodromidae in Spain, Portugal and Andorra is given, together with a distribution map for each species. We also give some data concerning its habitat and life cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen Und Angaben Zur Verbreitung Und Ökologie Der Einzelnen Arten
    5 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) Herausgeber: 4fr für Naturkunde, RosensteinV 70 19 l; , Staatliches Museum 1, D- r Stuttgart Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. A Nr. 506 170 S ,4. 9. 19.94 Professor Dr. Bernhard Ziegler zum 65. Geburtstag Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten The Tachinids (Diptera: Tachinidae) of Central Europe: Identification Keys for the Species and Data on Distribution and Ecology Von Hans-Peter Tschorsnig und Benno Herting, Stuttgart Mit 291 Abbildungen Summary Keys are given for all central and northern European species of Tachinidae (Diptera). The most important data on distribution and ecology (mainly habitat, phenology, and host-range) are listed for the central European species. Zuammenfassung Es werden Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle in Mittel- und Nordeuropa vorkommenden Arten der Tachinidae (Diptera) gegeben. Für jede mitteleuropäische Art werden die wichtigsten Kenndaten zur Verbreitung und Ökologie (vor allem Habitat, Flugzeit und Wirtskreis) aufge- listet. Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2 2. Beg'iff.c erklärungen 4 2.1. Allgemeines 4 2.2. Kopf 5 2.3. Thorax 7 2.4. Flügel 8 2.5. Beine 9 2.6. Abdomen 10 2.7. Bereifung 11 2.8. Färbung . 11 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 2 STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR NATURKUNDE Ser. A, Nr. 506 2.9. Körpergröße 11 2.10. Abkürzungen 11 3. Schlüssel für die Gattungen 12 4. Schlüssel für die Arten . 42 4.1. Subfamilie Exoristinae 42 4.2. Subfamilie Tachininae 63 4.3. Subfamilie Dexiinae 79 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024
    Bisley Road Cemetery, Stroud Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024 Prepared for Stroud Town Council CONTENTS 1 VISION STATEMENT 2 POLICY STATEMENTS 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 3.1 General background information 3.1.1 Location and site boundaries Map 1 Site Location 3.1.2 Tenure Map 2 Schedule Plan 3.1.3 Management/organisational infrastructure 3.1.4 Site infrastructure 3.1.5 Map coverage 3.2 Environmental information 3.2.1 Physical 3.2.2 Biological 3.2.2.1 Habitats Map 3 Compartment Map – Old Cemetery Map 4 Compartment Map – New Cemetery 3.2.2.2 Flora 3.2.2.3 Fauna 3.3 Cultural 3.3.1 Past land use 3.3.2 Present land use 3.3.3 Past management for nature conservation 3.3.4 Present legal status 4 NATURE CONSERVATION FEATURES OF INTEREST 4.1 Identification and confirmation of conservation features 4.2 Objectives 4.2.1 Unimproved grassland 4.2.1.1 Summary description 4.2.1.2 Management objectives 4.2.1.3 Performance indicators 4.2.1.4 Conservation status 4.2.1.5 Rationale 4.2.1.6 Management projects 4.2.2 Trees and Woodland 4.2.2.1 Summary description 4.2.2.2 Management objectives 4.2.2.3 Performance indicators 4.2.2.4 Conservation status 4.2.2.5 Rationale 4.2.2.6 Management projects 4.2.3 Lichens 4.2.3.1 Summary description 4.2.3.2 Management objectives 4.2.3.3 Performance indicators 4.2.3.4 Conservation status 4.2.3.5 Rationale 4.2.3.6 Management projects 4.3 Rationale & Proposals per compartment Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 2 5 HISTORIC INTEREST 5.1 Confirmation of conservation features 5.2 Objectives 5.3 Rationale 6 STAKEHOLDERS 6.1 Evaluation 6.2 Management projects 7 ACCESS / TOURISM 7.1 Evaluation 7.2 Management objectives 8 INTERPRETATION 8.1 Evaluation 8.2 Management Projects 9 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 9.1 Operational objectives 9.2 Management projects 10 WORK PLAN Appendix 1 Species List Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 3 1 VISION STATEMENT Stroud Town Council are committed to conserving Stroud Cemetery to: • Enable the people of Stroud to always have a place of peace and quiet reflection and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes
    kaft_def 7/8/04 11:22 AM Pagina 1 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY D ISTRIBUTION OF SPIDERS IN COASTAL GREY DUNES Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY- ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL - ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL Dries Bonte Dispersal is crucial in structuring species distribution, population structure and species ranges at large geographical scales or within local patchily distributed populations. The knowledge of dispersal evolution, motivation, its effect on metapopulation dynamics and species distribution at multiple scales is poorly understood and many questions remain unsolved or require empirical verification. In this thesis we contribute to the knowledge of dispersal, by studying both ecological and evolutionary aspects of spider dispersal in fragmented grey dunes. Studies were performed at the individual, population and assemblage level and indicate that behavioural traits narrowly linked to dispersal, con- siderably show [adaptive] variation in function of habitat quality and geometry. Dispersal also determines spider distribution patterns and metapopulation dynamics. Consequently, our results stress the need to integrate knowledge on behavioural ecology within the study of ecological landscapes. / Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eckhart Kuijken [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Dries Bonte Conservation] Co-promotor: Prf. Dr. Jean-Pierre Maelfait [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Conservation] and Prof. Dr. Luc lens [Ghent University] Date of public defence: 6 February 2004 [Ghent University] Universiteit Gent Faculteit Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2003-2004 Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes: spatial patterns and evolutionary-ecological importance of dispersal Verspreiding van spinnen in grijze kustduinen: ruimtelijke patronen en evolutionair-ecologisch belang van dispersie door Dries Bonte Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor [Ph.D.] in Sciences Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Promotor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Survey Results
    WILDLIFE IN COMMON SURVEY Wildlife in Common Survey Site Name: Pit Common (also known as Drove Hill Common) Parish: Southrepps Grid reference: TG 262353 Area: 0.36 hectares District: North Norfolk Survey date: 17 September 2018 Registered Common Number – CL 390 Pond on Pit Common 1 WILDLIFE IN COMMON SURVEY Annotated habitat map (showing target note numbers): 2 WILDLIFE IN COMMON SURVEY Habitat map 3 WILDLIFE IN COMMON SURVEY Habitat description: Situated in Lower Street Southrepps, Pit Common (registered as Drove Hill Common) is a small area of pond, grassland, scrub and planted trees, which rises up away from the road. Number Target Note (see map) 1 G1 (pond), F2.1 (Marginal vegetation) & A2 (Willow scrub) Pond. At the time of the survey the pond was dry. Invaded with New Zealand pygmy weed (Crassula helmsii) to the south and greater reed mace (Typha latifolia) to the North with a stand of common reed (Phragmites australis) to the East there was little open water. Small patches of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) to the east and west banks. Coppiced willow (Salix sp.) to the Northern end. Previous management of the pond has resulted in the presence of water lilies (Nyphaea alba). Also present are water plantain (Alisma plantago-aquatica), celery-leaved buttercup (Ranunculus scleratus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), hard rush (Juncus inflexus), and galingale (Cyperus longus). In 2009 the pond was completely dredged and a large area of open water formed. This has slowly silted up again and become overrun with the bulrush (Typha latifolia) and the Crassula that appeared this year (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Reactions to Auditory Stimulus by the Jumping Spider Phidippus Princeps (Araneae, Salticidae)
    Visual reactions to auditory stimulus by the jumping spider Phidippus princeps (Araneae, Salticidae) Philip Denbaum Degree project in biology, Master of science (2 years), 2019 Examensarbete i biologi 45 hp till masterexamen, 2019 Biology Education Centre, Uppsala University, and Elizabeth Jakob lab, University of Massachusetts Supervisors: Elizabeth Jakob and Anders Berglund External opponent: Emilie Laurent & Julian Baur Table of contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Methods and Materials 5 Spider collection and care 5 General experimental setup 5 Overview of the eyetracker 5 Securing the spider 6 Aligning spider and finding retinas 6 Experiment 7 Data analysis 8 Statistical analyses 9 Results 10 Analysis 1 10 Analysis 2 13 Discussion 14 Future studies 15 Conclusions 16 Acknowledgements 16 References 17 Appendix 19 !1 Abstract Jumping spiders (Family Salticidae) are known for their exceptional vision, including color vision and spatial acuity. Salticids use their vision in many behaviors, including predation and courtship. Recently evidence of their ability to sense airborne vibrations, i.e. sound, was published. I used a specialized jumping-spider-specific eyetracker to study the visual reaction of the retinas of the jumping spider Phidippus princeps when exposed to the sound of a predator. I used a generic wasp sound, previously shown to induce a startle response, as stimulus and played it from different directions. The spiders showed strong reactions to the sound stimulus by large increases in retinal movement when exposed to the stimulus, and they showed no habituation to the stimulus over three rounds of exposure. However, I found no indication that the direction of retinal movement corresponded to the location of the sound source.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi (8.011Mb)
    1 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) 2 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) ÖZET* 3 AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Yapılan bu çalışma ile Amasya, Sivas ve Tokat illerinin Kelkit havzasına ait kısımlarında bulunan ve farklı böcek takımlarında parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae (Diptera) türleri, bunların tanımları ve yayılışlarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için farklı böcek takımlarına ait türler laboratuvarda kültüre alınarak parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae türleri elde edilmiştir. Kültüre alınan Lepidoptera takımına ait türler içerisinden, Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.), Lymantria dispar (L.), Malacosoma neustrium (L.), Smyra dentinosa Freyer, Thaumetopoea solitaria Freyer, Thaumetopoea sp. ve Vanessa sp.,'den parazitoit elde edilmiş,
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuid Moth (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Communities in Urban Parks of Warsaw
    POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA MEMORABILIA ZOOL. 42 125-148 1986 GRAŻYNA WINIARSKA NOCTUID MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN URBAN PARKS OF WARSAW ABSTRACT A total of 40 noctuid moth species were recorded in four parks of Warsaw. Respective moth communities consisted of a similar number of species (17—25), but differed in their abundance index (3.5 —7.9). In all the parks, the dominant species were Autographa gamma and Discrestra trifolii. The subdominant species were represented by Acronicta psi, Trachea atriplicis, Mamestra suasa, Mythimna pallens, and Catocala nupta. There were differences in the species composition and dominance structure among noctuid moth communities in urban parks, suburban linden- oak-hornbeam forest, and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forest. In the suburban and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forests, the number of species was higher by 40% and their abundance wao 5 — 9 times higher than in the urban parks. The species predominating in parks occurred in very low numbers in suburban and natural habitats. Only T. atriplicis belonged to the group of most abundant species in all the habitats under study. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the interest of ecologists in urban habitats has been increasing as they proved to be rich in plant and animal species. The vegetation of urban green areas is sufficiently well known since its species composition and spatial structure are shaped by gardening treatment. But the fauna of these areas is poorly known, and regular zoological investigations in urban green areas were started not so long ago, when urban green was recognized as one of the most important factors of the urban “natural” habitat (Ciborowski 1976).
    [Show full text]