DOCSLIB.ORG

The Politics of Plato and His Objection to Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Politics of Plato and His Objection to Democracy '2,FXULH ANNALES 81,9(56,7$7,60$5,$(&85,(6.à2'2:6.$ /8%/,1±32/21,$ 92/;;, 6(&7,2. 0D\LV8QLYHUVLW\,VWDQEXO7XUNH\ $<',1723$/2ö/8 The Politics of Plato and His Objection to Democracy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ey words: 3ODWRSROLWLFVLGHDOVWDWHMXVWLFHW\SHVRIJRYHUQPHQWVDQGGHPRFUDF\ 3ODWR*UHHNFODVVLFDOSKLORVRSKHUUHPDUNVLQKLVSeventh LetterWKDW³«3HR- SOHZHUHGLVVDWLVILHGZLWKWKHH[LVWLQJFRQVWLWXWLRQDQGDUHYROXWLRQWRRNSODFH$V DUHVXOWRIZKLFKSRZHUZDVFRQFHQWUDWHGLQWKHKDQGVRIILIW\RQHPHQ«´$ULV- WRWOHDWHDFKHURI$OH[DQGHUWKH*UHDWDQG3ODWR¶VWHDFKHUUHPDUNVLQKLV3ROLWLFV ³$GHPRFUDF\H[LVWVZKHQHYHUWKRVHZKRDUHIUHHDQGDUHQRWZHOORIIEHLQJLQWKH PDMRULW\DUHLQVRYHUHLJQFRQWURORIJRYHUQPHQWDQROLJDUFK\ZKHQFRQWUROOLHVZLWK 3ODWRPhaedrus and Letters VII and VIII, WUDQVOE\:DOWHU+DPLOWRQ 3HQJXLQ%RRNV /RQGRQS(OHYHQRIWKHVHILIW\RQHPHQZHUHLQFKDUJHLQWKHFLW\DQGWHQLQ3LUDHXVWKLUW\ DVVXPHGVXSUHPHFRQWURORIWKHZKROHVWDWHDFFRUGLQJWR3ODWR $<',1723$/2ö/8 WKHULFKDQGEHWWHUERUQWKHVHEHLQJIHZ´%RWK3ODWR¶VRZQDFFRXQWH[SODLQVZK\ KHWXUQHGDZD\IURPSXEOLFOLIHHYHQKHKDGGHVLUHVLQKLV\RXWKDQG$ULVWRWOH¶VODWHU GLVWLQJXLVKLQJWKHIRUPVRIUXOLQJE\RQH PRQDUFK\ DIHZ ROLJDUFK\DULVWRFUDF\ RUPDQ\ GHPRFUDF\ LQKLVPoliticsJLYHXVHQRXJKLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHSUREOHPDWLF DVSHFWVRI$WKHQLDQGHPRFUDF\RIDQFLHQW*UHHNVDQG3ODWR¶VUHDVRQVIRUGLVDSSURYDO ,QWKLVSDSHU,ZRXOGOLNHWRGHDOZLWK3ODWR¶VDSSURDFKWRWKHSROLF\ILUVWDQGWR VWUHVVRQKLVLGHDVDERXWVWDWHVW\SHVRIJRYHUQPHQWVLGHDOVWDWHMXVWLFHGHPRFUDF\ FULWLFVDQGVKLSDQDORJ\3ODWR %&%& KDGQRWRQO\KDGSROLWLFDOGH- VLUHVEXWKDGDOVRWULHGWRHQJDJHLQDFWLYHSROLWLFV,QKLVRepublic, Laws, Letters DQG Politicus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¶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he Politics WUDQVOE\7$6LQFODLU 3HQJXLQ%RRNV/RQGRQES 5\OH*³3ODWR´The Encyclopedia of Philosophy3(GZDUGV HG 0DFPLOODQ1HZ <RUNYROS /DHUWLXV'LRJHQHVLives of Eminent Philosophers³3ODWR´%RRN,,, WUDQVOE\5'+LFNV +DUYDUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV/RQGRQ9RO,SS±'HVPRQG/HH¶VLQWURGXFWLRQIRUThe Republic 3ODWR3HQJXLQ%RRNV/RQGRQSS[L±OYL)0&RUQIRUG¶VLQWURGXFWLRQIRUThe Republic3ODWR 2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV/RQGRQSS[Y±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¶VZRUGVZLWKWKHDFFXVDWLRQRIEHLQJLPSLRXVDQGWKHFRXUWFRQGHPQHGDQG SXWKLPWRGHDWK7KHWULDORI6RFUDWHVDQGKLVGHDWKDWWKHHQGSOXQJHGWKH\RXQJ 3ODWRLQWRGHVSDLU%HFDXVHWKHUHZDVQRKRSHVDQLW\RUPRGHUDWLRQHLWKHUIURP ROLJDUFKRUGHPRFUDW7 3ODWRGLVLOOXVLRQHGE\6RFUDWHV¶FRQGHPQDWLRQWRGHDWKDWWKHKDQGVRIWKHDV- VHPEO\DEDQGRQHGKLVSROLWLFDOGHVLUHDQGVWDUWHGWRODXQFKDGHYDVWDWLQJDWWDFN $VZHZLOOVHHODWHUKHSXWVLQWRTXHVWLRQWKHSHRSOHV¶DELOLW\WRUXOHMXVWO\+HZLOO GHQRXQFHWKHXVHRIORWWRVHOHFWRIILFLDOVDVJLYLQJXQGXHSRZHUWRWKHOHVVDEOHDQG NQRZOHGJHDEOH $IWHUZDWFKLQJWKHWULDORI6RFUDWHV3ODWRORVWDJDLQKLVEHOLHIIRUGHPRFUDF\DQG KHVWDUWHGWRTXHVWLRQHYHU\WKLQJUHODWHGWRVWDWHDQGVRFLDOOLIH+HXQGHUVWRRGWKDW LWZDVGLIILFXOWWRWDNHSDUWLQSXEOLFOLIHDQGUHWDLQRQH¶VLQWHJULW\DQGWKHPRUHKH REVHUYHGWKHROGHUKHEHFDPH1RWKLQJFRXOGEHGRQHZLWKRXWIULHQGVDQGOR\DODV- VRFLDWHVEXWVXFKPHQZHUHQRWHDV\WRILQG%HFDXVHRIWKHFRUUXSWLRQVKHHQGHGE\ JURZLQJGL]]\DWWKHVSHFWDFOHRIXQLYHUVDOFRQIXVLRQ+HWKRXJKWWKDWQRWKLQJFRXOG FXUHWKHLUFRQVWLWXWLRQVEXWDPLUDFXORXVUHIRUPDVVLVWHGE\JRRGOXFN$QGDIWHUWKLV VDGQHVV3ODWRWROGKLVIDPRXVVHQWHQFH³7KHWURXEOHVRIPDQNLQGZLOOQHYHUFHDVH XQWLOHLWKHUWUXHJHQXLQHSKLORVRSKHUVDWWDLQSROLWLFDOSRZHURUWKHUXOHUVRIVWDWHVE\ VRPHGLVSHQVDWLRQRISURYLGHQFHEHFRPHJHQXLQHSKLORVRSKHUV´8 )RU3ODWRWRNQRZVRPHWKLQJJRRGZDVQRWHQRXJKEXWWKHUHZDVDQHHGWRSUDF- WLFHWKHJRRGQHVVRQDOODVSHFWVRIVRFLDOOLIH3KLORVRSK\ZDVQRWRQO\DWKHRUHWLFDO LVVXHEXWDOVRDSUDFWLFDOYDOXH,WZDVZLVGRPZKHQSUDFWLFHDQGWKHRU\FRPELQHG HDFKRWKHU3ODWR¶VLQWHUHVWDQGSXUVXHRQUXOLQJVWDWHHWKLFODZDQGSROLF\PDGH KLPRQHRIWKHJUHDWHVWV\VWHPDWLFSKLORVRSKHUVRIKLVWRU\+HZDVRIWHQGHVFULEHG DVWKHJUHDWHVWZHVWHUQSKLORVRSKHUDV:KLWHKHDGSRLQWHGRXWWKDWWKHVDIHVWJHQHUDO FKDUDFWHUL]DWLRQRIWKH(XURSHDQSKLORVRSKLFDOWUDGLWLRQLVWKDWLWFRQVLVWVRIDVHULHV RIIRRWQRWHVWR3ODWR9 *UXEH*0$Plato’s Thought+DFNHWW3XEOLVKLQJ&RPSDQ\,QF,QGLDQDSROLVS 7 Ibid.S 8 3ODWRPhaedrus and Letters VII and VIII3HQJXLQ%RRNV/RQGRQS 9 :KLWHKHDG$1Process and Reality in Essays in Cosmology':6KHUEXUQH'5*ULIILQ HG 7KH)UHH3UHVV1HZ<RUNS $<',1723$/2ö/8 3ODWRWHOOVXVKLPVHOIWKDWKLVFKLHIUHDVRQZDVDQLQWHQVLYHIHHOLQJRIVKDPHOHVW KHVKRXOGILQGKLPVHOIWREHDPHUHEXLOGHURIWKHRULHVZKHQKHZDVFDOOHGXSRQE\ KLVIULHQG'LRQIRUHGXFDWLRQRIWKH\RXQJ'LRQ\VXV$QGVHFRQGWLPHKHVWDUWHGWR LQYROYHZLWKSROLF\ZLWKKRSLQJWRWHDFKJRRGQHVVDQGSKLORVRSK\WR'LRQ\VXVE\ HQFRXUDJLQJ'LRQ%HFDXVHSROLWLFVZDVDVFLHQFHDLPLQJDWPDNLQJWKHFLWL]HQVEHWWHU PHQDQGKHZRXOGQRWKDYHHVFDSHGIURPKLVUHVSRQVLELOLW\$IWHUDOLWWOHELWKHVLWDWLRQ 3ODWRDFFHSWHGWKHLQYLWDWLRQRI'LRQOHIWKLVODQGVDQGZHQWWR6\UDFXVH%\GRLQJ VRKHGLVFKDUJHGWKHFODLPVRIKRVSLWDOLW\DQGSUHVHUYHGKLPVHOIIURPDQ\UHSURDFK IURPSKLORVRSK\ZKLFKZRXOGKDYHVXIIHUHGVKDPHLIKHKDGSOD\HGWKHFRZDUGDQG LQFXUUHGGLVJUDFHE\VKLUNLQJKLVGXW\8QIRUWXQDWHO\KLVVHFRQGDWWHPSWIDLOHG WRR%HFDXVHKHXQGHUVWRRGWKDWSHRSOHOLVWHQRQO\WRZKDWSOHDVHVWKHP3HRSOHZKR FRQVXOWKLPKDYHFRPSOHWHO\DEDQGRQHGWKHWUXHSULQFLSOHVRIJRYHUQPHQWDQGILUPO\ UHIXVHWRUHWXUQWRWKHULJKWWUDFNDQGWHOOWKHLUDGYLVHUWROHWWKHFRQVWLWXWLRQDORQH RQSDLQRIGHDWKDQGWRFRQILQHKLPVHOIWRDGYLVLQJRQWKHTXLFNHVWDQGHDVLHVWZD\ IRUWKHPWRREWDLQWKHSHUPDQHQWVDWLVIDFWLRQRIWKHLUZLVKHVDQGGHVLUHV3ODWRFDOOV WKHSHUVRQZKRJDYHDGYLFHRQWKHVHWHUPVDFRZDUGDQGWKHSHUVRQZKRUHIXVHGLW DEUDYHPDQ$IWHUWKLVIDLOXUHEDGSROLWLFDOH[SHULHQFH3ODWRTXHVWLRQHGWKHV\VWHP LQZKLFKWKHPDVVHVGRPLQDWHWKHUXOHV+HZDVQRORYHURIWKH$WKHQLDQGHPRFUDF\ +HFULWLFL]HGWKH$WKHQLDQVDQGOLNHG'DULXVWKH.LQJRI3HUVLDDQGFDOOHGKLPDV DJRRGODZJLYHUDQGNLQJ%HFDXVH'DULXVSUHVHUYHGKLVHPSLUHXQWLOKLVWLPHZLWK EHOLHYLQJQRWWRRQO\KLVEURWKHUVRUPHQEURXJKWXSE\KLPVHOIEXWRQO\WKRVHZKR KHOSHGWKHPUHO\LQJRQOR\DOW\ZLWKRXWDQ\DWWDFNEHWZHHQWKHP $FFRUGLQJWR3ODWRVRFLHW\PXVWEHRUJDQL]HGDQGFRQWUROOHGQRWE\PDVVHVEXW E\SHUVRQVZKRUHDOO\NQRZZKDWWKHQRUPVDUH6DOYDWLRQIRUVRFLHW\OD\LQUHPRYLQJ JRYHUQPHQWIURPWKHXQWXWRUHGKDQGVRIWKHRUGLQDU\PDQLQRUGHUWKDWWKHVWDWHFRXOG EHGLUHFWHGDFFRUGLQJWRWKHILQGLQJVRISKLORVRSK\)RUH[DPSOHRUGLQDU\SHRSOH GRQRWNQRZZKDWµSLHW\¶RUµMXVWLFH¶LV7KH\FODLPWRNQRZWKHJRRGLQSROLWLFVEXW DVWKHLURSLQLRQVQHYHUVWDQGXSWRH[DPLQDWLRQWKHLUDFWLRQVDUHOLNHO\WREHZURQJ EHLQJEDVHGRQLJQRUDQFH,PSLHW\DQGXQMXVWQHVVVWHPIURPLJQRUDQFHµ*RRGPDQ¶ LVDVDKDSS\PDQEHFDXVHKHLVWHPSHUDWHDQGMXVWQRPDWWHUKHLVELJDQGVWURQJ RUVPDOODQGZHDNRUULFKRUSRRU,IKHLVXQMXVWKHLVDZUHWFKDQGOLYHVDOLIHRI PLVHU\HYHQLIKHGRHVVRPHWKLQJZKDWSHRSOHFRPPRQO\FDOO³JRRG´%HFDXVHWKLQJV RUGLQDU\SHRSOHXVXDOO\FDOOµJRRG¶DUHPLVQDPHG6RFDOOHGHYLOVDUHJRRGIRUWKH XQMXVWDQGVRFDOOHGµJRRGV¶DUHHYLOVIRUWKHZLFNHG+HUHZHVHH6RFUDWHV¶UHIOH[LRQV RQ3ODWR+HKDVQRIDLWKLQLJQRUDQWPDVVHVDQGSD\VQRDWWHQWLRQWRWKHOLIHZLWKLQ WKHP:KHQ6RFUDWHVZDVH[HFXWHGLQ3ODWROHIW$WKHQVDVDGLVDSSRLQWPHQW PDQIURPSROLWLFDODWWHPSWV+HWKRXJKWWKDWDOOVWDWHVKDGQRWEHHQJRYHUQHGZHOO 3ODWRThe Republicop. cit.S Ibid.S 3ODWRLaws WUDQVOE\7-6DXQGHUV 3HQJXLQ%RRNV/RQGRQSS± Ibid.SS± 7+(32/,7,&62)3/$72$1'+,62%-(&7,2172'(02&5$&< 77
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cicero Gubernator: the Ship of State in Cicero's Letters Among the Most
    Cicero Gubernator: The Ship of State in Cicero’s Letters Among the most common metaphors in Greek and Roman political literature is the so- called “ship of state” metaphor. This metaphor represents the state or body politic as a ship sailing through a stormy sea. Just as the ship must navigate through storms, so too must the state navigate through political strife, war, or despotism. The metaphor was used by a wide variety of Greek authors including Alcaeus, Theognis, Solon, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Plato, Aristophanes, and Demosthenes. Various Roman authors adopted this metaphor for their own purposes, as well, but nowhere is the metaphor so striking as in Cicero’s works. Scholarship on this metaphor in Cicero’s works has to date focused largely on his political speeches and philosophical treatises. For example, May (1980) discusses the use of the metaphor in Cicero’s Pro Sestio, while Wood (1988) and Zarecki (2014) explore the metaphor from more philosophical and political perspectives. Fantham (1972) surveys Republican imagery and includes indispensable information on the ship of state metaphor. Cicero’s letters offer many valuable instances of the metaphor, and since they span a significant length of Cicero’s life, they provide a useful historical context for understanding the metaphor in Cicero’s other works as well. In his letters, the ship of state metaphor reveals Cicero’s perceptions of changing political circumstances. I argue that Cicero employs this metaphor in three distinct ways. First, he most commonly uses it to express pessimism about politics or his own life. For example, there are three letters from around the time of Cicero’s exile that use the metaphor to express his utter grief, and at the outbreak of civil war, he uses the metaphor to show his lack of faith in Pompey, his gubernator.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Ancient Athens Was Different from What We Have in Canada Today
    54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 54 CHAPTER Democracy in 3 Ancient Athens Take a long step 2500 years back in time. Imagine you are a boy living in the ancient city of Athens, Greece. Your slave, words matter! Cleandros [KLEE-an-thros], is walking you to school. Your father Ancient refers to something and a group of his friends hurry past talking loudly. They are on from a time more than their way to the Assembly. The Assembly is an important part of 2500 years ago. democratic government in Athens. All Athenian men who are citizens can take part in the Assembly. They debate issues of concern and vote on laws. As the son of a citizen, you look forward to being old enough to participate in the Assembly. The Birthplace of Democracy The ancient Greeks influenced how people today think about citizenship and rights. In Athens, a form of government developed in which the people participated. The democracy we enjoy in Canada had its roots in ancient Athens. ■ How did men who were citizens participate in the democratic government in Athens? ■ Did Athens have representative government? Explain. 54 54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 55 “Watch Out for the Rope!” Cleandros takes you through the agora, a large, open area in the middle of the city. It is filled with market stalls and men shopping and talking. You notice a slave carrying a rope covered with red paint. He ? Inquiring Minds walks through the agora swinging the rope and marking the men’s clothing with paint.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Aristotle's Concept of the State
    Page No.13 2. Aristotle's concept of the state Olivera Z. Mijuskovic Full Member International Association of Greek Philosophy University of Athens, Greece ORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5950-7146 URL: http://worldphilosophynetwork.weebly.com E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract: In contrast to a little bit utopian standpoint offered by Plato in his teachings about the state or politeia where rulers aren`t “in love with power but in virtue”, Aristotle's teaching on the same subject seems very realistic and pragmatic. In his most important writing in this field called "Politics", Aristotle classified authority in the form of two main parts: the correct authority and moose authority. In this sense, correct forms of government are 1.basileus, 2.aristocracy and 3.politeia. These forms of government are based on the common good. Bad or moose forms of government are those that are based on the property of an individual or small governmental structures and they are: 1.tiranny, 2.oligarchy and 3.democracy. Also, Aristotle's political thinking is not separate from the ethical principles so he states that the government should be reflected in the true virtue that is "law" or the "golden mean". Keywords: Government; stat; , virtue; democracy; authority; politeia; golden mean. Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016) Issue- December ISSN 2347-6869 (E) & ISSN 2347-2146 (P) Aristotle's concept of the state by Olivera Z. Mijuskovic Page no. 13-20 Page No.14 Aristotle's concept of the state 1.1. Aristotle`s “Politics” Politics in its defined form becomes affirmed by the ancient Greek world.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Notes for Aristotle's Politics
    Sean Hannan Classics of Social & Political Thought I Autumn 2014 Discussion Notes for Aristotle’s Politics BOOK I 1. Introducing Aristotle a. Aristotle was born around 384 BCE (in Stagira, far north of Athens but still a ‘Greek’ city) and died around 322 BCE, so he lived into his early sixties. b. That means he was born about fifteen years after the trial and execution of Socrates. He would have been approximately 45 years younger than Plato, under whom he was eventually sent to study at the Academy in Athens. c. Aristotle stayed at the Academy for twenty years, eventually becoming a teacher there himself. When Plato died in 347 BCE, though, the leadership of the school passed on not to Aristotle, but to Plato’s nephew Speusippus. (As in the Republic, the stubborn reality of Plato’s family connections loomed large.) d. After living in Asia Minor from 347-343 BCE, Aristotle was invited by King Philip of Macedon to serve as the tutor for Philip’s son Alexander (yes, the Great). Aristotle taught Alexander for eight years, then returned to Athens in 335 BCE. There he founded his own school, the Lyceum. i. Aside: We should remember that these schools had substantial afterlives, not simply as ideas in texts, but as living sites of intellectual energy and exchange. The Academy lasted from 387 BCE until 83 BCE, then was re-founded as a ‘Neo-Platonic’ school in 410 CE. It was finally closed by Justinian in 529 CE. (Platonic philosophy was still being taught at Athens from 83 BCE through 410 CE, though it was not disseminated through a formalized Academy.) The Lyceum lasted from 334 BCE until 86 BCE, when it was abandoned as the Romans sacked Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Phil 110: Logic Phil 120: Ethics Phil 130: Philosophy of Religion Phil 140
    philosophy2012 philj-term 185: big questions Perhaps the greatest single attempt to answer the basic questions of philosophy is Plato’s famous work The Republic. With its unforgettable images of “the ship of state”, “the divided line”, prof.“the allegory matt of the simpson cave”, and “the myth of Er”, Plato’s Republic is not only fascinating and influential, it is also very fun to read. First-year seminar. phil 185: philosophy through film Plato said “those who tell stories rule society.” Today the primary storytellers are not philosophers but filmmakers. Embedded in many films are powerful statements concerning the funda- mental philosophical questions that every thoughtful person must face: What is the nature of reality? What is the extent of human knowledge? Are there objective moral facts? Does God exist? prof.This course greg invites studentsjesson to analyze the many films selected for the class by critically thinking about the views being presented, and discussing them in a rigorous way. First-year seminar. phil 240: philosophy of art: art & its others Every definition of art requires the identification of what is not art. In this course we will consider the history of such definitions, identifying the battle-grounds of its inclusions and exclusions. In order to better understand the significance of art’s boundaries, students will study local art practices among traditionally excluded art forms and artists. Pre-req.: 1 Philosophy or 2 Art prof.courses, orholly instructor moore approval. spring Anphil introduction 100: to basic questions introduction in philosophy concerning God,to the philosophynature of reality, knowledge and truth, human nature, morality, and the individual in society, together with the range of arguments and answers that philosophers have developed in response to them.
    [Show full text]
  • ARISTOTLE and the IMPORTANCE of VIRTUE in the CONTEXT of the POLITICS and the NICOMACHEAN ETHICS and ITS RELATION to TODAY Kyle Brandon Anthony Bucknell University
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2010 ARISTOTLE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF VIRTUE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLITICS AND THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS AND ITS RELATION TO TODAY Kyle Brandon Anthony Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Anthony, Kyle Brandon, "ARISTOTLE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF VIRTUE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLITICS AND THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS AND ITS RELATION TO TODAY" (2010). Honors Theses. 21. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/21 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 What does it mean to live a good life? 7 The virtuous life 8 Ethical virtue 13 Bravery as an ethical virtue 20 Justice 22 Chapter 2 The Politics and the ideal polis 28 Development of a polis 29 Features of an ideal polis 32 What does it mean to be a citizen of a polis? 40 Aristotle’s views on education 42 Social groups in a polis who are not recognized as citizens 45 Non-ideal political systems 51 Chapter 3 Connections between the Politics and the Ethics 57 Chapter 4 Difficulties in applying Aristotle’s theories to a modern setting 68 Conclusion Where do we go from here? 87 Bibliography 89 iv Acknowledgements First off, I have to thank God, as He helped me endure this project and gave me the courage to press on when I became frustrated, angry, and ready to quit.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 BC Exiles
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1971 Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 B. C. Exiles: A Case of Political Irrationality Peter Karavites Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Karavites, Peter, "Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 B. C. Exiles: A Case of Political Irrationality" (1971). Dissertations. Paper 1192. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1192 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1971 Peter. Karavites PROBLEMS IN ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY 510-480 B.C. EXILES A Case of Political Irrationality A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty o! the Department of History of Loyola University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy b;y Peter Karavites ?ROBLEt'.n IN ATP.EHIA:rT n:s::ocRACY 5'10-480 n.c. EXIL:ffi: A case in Politioal Irrationality Peter·KARAVIT~ Ph.D. Loyola UniVGl'Sity, Chicago, 1971 This thesis is m attempt to ev"aluate the attitude of the Athenian demos during the tormative years of the Cleisthenian democracy. The dissertation tries to trace the events of the period from the mpul­ sion of Hippian to the ~ttle of Sal.amis. Ma.tural.ly no strict chronological sequence can be foll.amtd.. The events are known to us only f'ragmen~. some additional archaeological Wormation has trickled dcmn to us 1n the last tro decad.all 11h1ch shed light on the edating historical data prO\Tided ma:1nly by Herodotus md Arletotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Aristotle
    Politics Aristotle Translated by Benjamin Jowett Batoche Books Kitchener 1999 Contents BOOK ONE .............................................................................. 3 BOOK TWO ........................................................................... 22 BOOK THREE ....................................................................... 51 BOOK FOUR ......................................................................... 80 BOOK FIVE ......................................................................... 108 BOOK SIX ........................................................................... 140 BOOK SEVEN ..................................................................... 152 BOOK EIGHT ...................................................................... 180 BOOK ONE Part I Every state is a community of some kind, and every community is es- tablished with a view to some good; for mankind always act in order to obtain that which they think good. But, if all communities aim at some good, the state or political community, which is the highest of all, and which embraces all the rest, aims at good in a greater degree than any other, and at the highest good. Some people think that the qualifications of a statesman, king, house- holder, and master are the same, and that they differ, not in kind, but only in the number of their subjects. For example, the ruler over a few is called a master; over more, the manager of a household; over a still larger number, a statesman or king, as if there were no difference be- tween a great household and a small state. The distinction which is made between the king and the statesman is as follows: When the government is personal, the ruler is a king; when, according to the rules of the politi- cal science, the citizens rule and are ruled in turn, then he is called a statesman. But all this is a mistake; for governments differ in kind, as will be evident to any one who considers the matter according to the method which has hitherto guided us.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato‟S Concept of Democracy and Contemporary Political Scenario In
    International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR) ISSN: 2000-006X Vol. 3 Issue 4, April – 2019, Pages: 10-16 Plato‟s Concept of Democracy and Contemporary Political Scenario in Nigeria Eugene Anowai, PhD (Louvain) Philosophy Department, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Igbariam Campus, Anambra State [email protected] +234-7032852434 Abstract: Plato finds that the necessity for society and the state resides in human nature itself. No one is sufficient in himself; everyone needs the aid of others in order to live life worthy of man. Hence man must live with others in society in order to make use of them both materially and morally. So from the moment society arises out of necessity of meeting the needs of man, the members which make up society must be organised into different classes according to the diversity of works to be performed. This paper examines the Plato’s ideal state and criticisms of democracy and tries to prove that it is relevant in Nigeria’s present democratic scenario. The paper will show how significant they are to abate Nigerian democratic corruption and some of his suggestions for good governance could be utilized to address the problem of present day democracy in Nigeria. Keywords: Society, Democracy, good governance, Ideal State, Corruption. 1. INTRODUCTION extremely prosperous commercial state, a thorough-going democracy, a community in which material prosperity went Plato has exerted a greater influence over human thought together with a magnificent culture, a culture in which art than any other individual with the possible exception of went together with science and both were overtopped by Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Empire in Greek Antiquity
    This course will explore the history, culture, and art of post- classical Greek antiquity, focusing on the period between two of the most studied and renowned figures of the ancient world: Alexander the Great and Cleopatra VII. We will learn and analyze how the ancient world changed with Alexander and his successors, emphasizing the political, social, and cultural transformations; changes in the religious landscape; and formation of the state. We will also discuss the legacy of the Hellenistic world as an integral part of our intellectual heritage. Developments in Athenian Democracy DRACONIAN Laws (DRACO)7th c BCE strict laws enforcing aristocratic rule- there was only one penalty prescribed, death, for every crime from murder down to loitering (see Plut. Sol. 17.1). - the new Constitution gave political rights to those Athenians “who bore arms,” those Athenians wealthy enough to afford the bronze armor and weapons of a hoplite. CRISIS- 1) Tensions among aristocrats- 2) Poor citizens, in years of poor harvests, had to mortgage portions of their land to wealthier citizens in exchange for food and seed to plant. They became more vulnerable to subsequent hardships (see Aristot. Ath. Pol. 2.1-2). SOLON- 6th c. SOLONIAN LAWS they did not establish a democracy as radical as what would follow He took steps to alleviate the crisis of debt that the poor suffered He abolished the practice of giving loans with a citizen’s freedom as collateral He gave every Athenian the right to appeal to a jury, thus taking ultimate authority for interpreting the law out of the hands of the Nine Archons (remnant of aristocracy) and putting it in the hands of a more democratic body, since any citizen could serve on a jury.
    [Show full text]