An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle As an Underwater Glider and Its Depth Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle As an Underwater Glider and Its Depth Control International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems (2015) 13(5):1212-1220 ISSN:1598-6446 eISSN:2005-4092 DOI 10.1007/s12555-014-0252-8 http://www.springer.com/12555 An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle as an Underwater Glider and Its Depth Control Moon G. Joo* and Zhihua Qu Abstract: To provide a conventional autonomous underwater vehicle with gliding capability, we as- sume a moving battery and a buoyancy bag installed in a torpedo shaped autonomous underwater ve- hicle. We develop a mathematical model for the underwater vehicle and derive a stable gliding condi- tion for it. Then an LQR controller is designed to control the zigzag depth of the vehicle, where the de- rived gliding condition is used as set-points of the control system. For control efforts in the gliding movement, the changes in the center of gravity and the net buoyancy are used, but neither thruster nor rudders are used. By using the gliding capability, the underwater vehicle can move to a farther location silently with less energy consumption and then start operating as a normal autonomous underwater ve- hicle. We show the feasibility of the proposed method by simulations using Matlab/Simulink. Keywords: Autonomous underwater vehicle, depth control, LQR controller, underwater glider. 1. INTRODUCTION winged airplane, and it performs a vertical zigzag movement to go forward by changing net buoyancy and Unmanned underwater vehicles have been developed the position of center of gravity [6-10]. UWG has been in many countries. They can be roughly categorized into developed as a moving device for measuring temperature, autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) [1-4] and salinity, water currents, etc. Since a very small amount of remotely operated vehicle (ROV) depending on the energy is required to inflate/deflate buoyancy bag or to existence of tether that determines the autonomy level. push/pull the position of the battery position to change AUV has on-board power and an on-board navigation the center of gravity, UWG has a long operation time system free from a tether, whereas ROV needs a tether to that lasts over a month and thus offers a long range be supplied with power and steering control from the coverage wider than 1000 km. However, it has mother ship on the surface. A kind of hybrid AUV has disadvantages from the large turning radius which makes also been developed which has the appearance of a it difficult for precise position control. conventional ROV having several thrusters to move to Combining the good aspects of the conventional AUV any direction but having no tether to transport power and and UWG is so natural that some of the combined control signals from the mother ship [5]. underwater vehicles have been developed including an The conventional AUV has a torpedo shape. It has at UWG without wings [11-13], an UWG with thruster and least one thruster to go forward and rudders to change rudders [14], and an AUV with buoyancy bag and direction. The main area of application is military moving mass [15]. It can be another type of hybrid AUV operation such as mine detection, terrain search, in a sense that it can be used either as an AUV or as an surveillance mission, and so on. Its advantages include a UWG when necessary. rapid response and a small turning radius. Since propeller From the viewpoint of modeling for control purpose, a thrust needs much energy, however, its operating time is REMUS as a conventional AUV has been modeled in [1], limited to a few hours. On the other hand, the underwater where the AUV was assumed to be a rigid body and the glider (UWG) is a kind of AUV, which is shaped like a external forces were mathematically obtained by the mechanical shapes of the hull, rudder, and sterns. Then __________ the higher order terms of the external forces were Manuscript received June 23, 2014; revised September 26, ignored for simplification. Control inputs are the thruster 2014; accepted November 1, 2014. Recommended by Associate Editor Sung Jin Yoo under the direction of Editor Hyouk Ryeol velocity and the angle of sterns and rudders. There have Choi. been many control schemes reported such as PID, state This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program feedback, sliding mode controller, neuro-fuzzy system, through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded and so on [16-20]. The modeling for UWG was also by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2013 conducted in [21,22] assuming the vehicle as a multi R1A1A4A01005930). body system consisting of moving masses, a hull, and a Moon G. Joo is with the Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Pukyong National University, variable mass buoyancy. External forces are not modeled Busan 608-737, Korea (e-mail: [email protected]). directly, but obtained by the experiment or Zhihua Qu is with the Department of Electrical Engineering computational fluid dynamics software. They are and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, FL 32816, described as functions of lift and drag depending on the USA (e-mail: [email protected]). angle of attack. Control inputs are the position of moving © ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2015 An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle as an Underwater Glider and Its Depth Control 1213 mass and the mass of buoyancy. Some control schemes have been also reported [23-27]. In modeling of the hybrid AUV combining AUV and UWG, no unified modeling to handle both aspects of AUV and UWG has been reported yet to the best of our knowledge. We, thus, propose a method of developing a unified model in order to add a gliding capability to the conventional AUV with which it can travel a long distance to a far location as an UWG and then operate as a normal AUV. The REMUS model in [1] is applied basically to use the already developed AUV control scheme in the AUV mode, and the work in [21] is adopted to derive the stable gliding condition in glider Fig. 2. State variables represented in the body fixed mode. This kind of hybrid AUV is advantageous from coordinate system and the earth fixed coordinate the aspect of quietness and energy saving under low system. current since it makes neither the noise nor the turbulence which an AUV inevitably makes because of equations using 12 state variables, (,xyzuvw ,,,, ,,φθ , the propeller thruster. ψ ,,,)pqr as shown in Fig. 2 [28,29]. The NED Section 2 develops a dynamic model for an AUV as an coordinate is used as the earth fixed coordinate system. UWG. Section 3 derives the desired value of several Generally, the center of buoyancy is used as the origin necessary state variables for a stable gliding. Section 4 of the body fixed coordinate, i.e., xyz===0. The develops a linearized depth model to design a controller bbb center of gravity in each direction is denoted as (,x y , for vertical plane movement. Section 5 gives the gg z ). The mass of the vehicle is mmmm=++ simulation results using Matlab. A brief summary is g vh b where mh is the mass of hull and its static components, followed in Section 6. m m is the moving mass such as battery pack, and b is 2. MODELING OF AUV AS UWG the point mass buoyancy. The mass of the water m displaced by the vehicle is denoted as . Then the net mmm=−. Because the controllers of AUV such as REMUS have buoyancy mass is ov I been widely studied, this paper focuses on controlling an Now we have the following 12 dynamic equations. xx, I I AUV as UWG under the assumption that the AUV has a yy and zz are moments of inertia in the body fixed buoyancy bag and a moving battery pack in its hull as coordinate. Among them, equations (1)-(6) are labeled to shown in Fig. 1. The purpose of modification is to endow depict the vertical plane movement of the robot for later the AUV with gliding capability which does not use any use. propeller propulsion. m[() u −+ vr wq − x q22 + r It is worth to mention that unwinged UWGs in [11-13] vg (1) +−++=ypqr()()] zprq X, are supposed to be operated as underwater gliders only. g g ∑ ext UWG in [14] focused on the change of parameter values mv[() −+− wpury r22 + p due to the thruster and rudders from only the viewpoint vg (2) of underwater glider. AUV in [15] is most similar and +−++=z ()()]qr p x qp r Y , gg∑ ext has a buoyancy bag and a moving battery in its hull, but I pI+−()[() Iqrmywuqvp + −+ it uses the buoyancy bag and the moving battery to xx zz yy v g achieve zero angle of attack at neutral buoyancy, for −−+zvwpur(), ] = K g ∑ ext efficient propeller propulsion to minimize drag effect and I qI+−()[() Irpmzuvrwq + −+ thus to lengthen the operational time and range. In other yy xx zz v g (3) words, the AUV operates always as a propeller-driven −−+xwuqvp() ],= M g ∑ ext AUV, even though the vertical zigzag trajectory is used I rI+−()[() Ipqmxvwpur + −+ during its operation. zz yy xx v g −−+yuvrwq(), ] = N It is well known that an underwater robot with 6 g ∑ ext degrees of freedom is described by nonlinear differential xu =+cosψθ cos v (cos ψθφ sin sin − sin ψ cos φ) (4) ++w(cosψθφ sin sin sin ψφ sin ), yu =+sinψθ cos v (sin ψθφ sin sin + cos ψφ cos ) +−w(sinψθφ sin cos cos ψφ sin ), (5) zu =−sinθθφθφ + v cos sin + w cos sin , φφθφθ =+pqsin tan + r cos tan , θφφ =−qrcos sin , (6) Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying
    Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology available for Routine Marine Surveying Project Leaders: Dr Russell Wynn (NOC) and Dr Elizabeth Linley (NERC) Report Prepared by: Dr James Hunt (NOC) Inventory correct as of September 2013 1 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Contents United Kingdom Institutes ................................................................. 16 Marine Autonomous and Robotic Systems (MARS) at National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Southampton ................................. 17 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at MARS ................................... 18 Autosub3 ...................................................................................................... 18 Technical Specification for Autosub3 ......................................................... 18 Autosub6000 ................................................................................................ 19 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 19 Autosub LR ...................................................................................................... 20 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 20 Air-Launched AUVs ........................................................................................ 21 Gliders at MARS .............................................................................................. 22 Teledyne
    [Show full text]
  • AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: a Review
    applied sciences Review AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: A Review Jimin Hwang 1 , Neil Bose 2 and Shuangshuang Fan 3,* 1 Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, TAS, Australia; [email protected] 2 Department of Ocean and Naval Architectural Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada; [email protected] 3 School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 2 August 2019 Abstract: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots that have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions. They are programmed to perform at various levels of autonomy, including autonomous behaviours and intelligent behaviours. Adaptive sampling is one class of intelligent behaviour that allows the vehicle to autonomously make decisions during a mission in response to environment changes and vehicle state changes. Having a closed-loop control architecture, an AUV can perceive the environment, interpret the data and take follow-up measures. Thus, the mission plan can be modified, sampling criteria can be adjusted, and target features can be traced. This paper presents an overview of existing adaptive sampling techniques. Included are adaptive mission uses and underlying methods for perception, interpretation and reaction to underwater phenomena in AUV operations. The potential for future research in adaptive missions is discussed. Keywords: autonomous underwater vehicle(s); maritime robotics; adaptive sampling; underwater feature tracking; in-situ sensors; sensor fusion 1. Introduction Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots. Owing to their mobility and increased ability to accommodate sensors, they have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions, such as surveying underwater plumes and other phenomena, collecting bathymetric data and tracking oceanographic dynamic features.
    [Show full text]
  • MODELING, DESIGN and CONTROL of GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By
    MODELING, DESIGN AND CONTROL OF GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By Feitian Zhang A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Electrical Engineering – Doctor of Philosophy 2014 ABSTRACT MODELING, DESIGN AND CONTROL OF GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By Feitian Zhang Autonomous underwater robots have been studied by researchers for the past half century. In particular, for the past two decades, due to the increasing demand for environmental sustainability, significant attention has been paid to aquatic environmental monitoring using autonomous under- water robots. In this dissertation, a new type of underwater robots, gliding robotic fish, is proposed for mobile sensing in versatile aquatic environments. Such a robot combines buoyancy-driven gliding and fin-actuated swimming, inspired by underwater gliders and robotic fish, to realize both energy-efficient locomotion and high maneuverability. Two prototypes, a preliminary miniature underwater glider and a fully functioning gliding robotic fish, are presented. The actuation system and the sensing system are introduced. Dynamic model of a gliding robotic fish is derived by in- tegrating the dynamics of miniature underwater glider and the influence of an actively-controlled tail. Hydrodynamic model is established where hydrodynamic forces and moments are dependent on the angle of attack and the sideslip angle. Using the technique of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) water-tunnel simulation is carried out for evaluating the hydrodynamic coefficients. Scaling analysis is provided to shed light on the dimension design. Two operational modes of gliding robotic fish, steady gliding in the sagittal plane and tail- enabled spiraling in the three-dimensional space, are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Glider Robot a Sleek Ocean Explorer 27 December 2009, by Sandy Bauers
    Glider robot a sleek ocean explorer 27 December 2009, By Sandy Bauers The sea was heaving, the skies gray. The captain surface. of the research ship was worried about the weather. About 120 miles off the coast of Spain, Roemmich works with another project, dubbed three Rutgers University scientists had a narrow Argo, which employs 3,000 buoys worldwide, about window of opportunity to find and retrieve their 180 miles apart, to sample the water column. But prize -- an 8-foot, torpedo-shaped yellow robot that they can only drift. they had launched seven months earlier off the coast of New Jersey. The glider, loaded with data sensors, can be directed. They could grab it and learn from it, or in the rough seas accidentally ram it and sink it. "We are data poor for understanding how the ocean operates, and this is going to give us the capability After an hour of pitching in the 20-foot waves, the to understand this much better," said Richard shipmates let out a cheer. Having spent 221 days Spinrad, assistant administrator of the National at sea on a voyage of 4,604 miles, the robot Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Silver dubbed Scarlet Knight was safely aboard. Spring, Md. With that came the completion of a mission that "If we can go across the Atlantic, we can go just made oceanographic history. about anywhere with these." Not only was the robot -- an underwater glider -- And what a way to go. the first of its ilk to cross the Atlantic, a mission supporters compared to Sputnik and Charles For its long, solo flights, the glider needs to be a Lindbergh's solo flight.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Level Motion Controller for Low-Cost Underwater Gliders
    2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Washington State Convention Center Seattle, Washington, May 26-30, 2015 A Multi-level Motion Controller for Low-Cost Underwater Gliders Guilherme Aramizo Ribeiro, Anthony Pinar, Eric Wilkening, Saeedeh Ziaeefard, and Nina Mahmoudian Abstract— An underwater glider named ROUGHIE (Research deploying UGs [23] for submarine tracking. With a valida- Oriented Underwater Glider for Hands-on Investigative Engineer- tion platform, researchers will be able to better understand ing) is designed and manufactured to provide a test platform and glider dynamics [24] and improve UG effectiveness in littoral framework for experimental underwater automation. This paper presents an efficient multi-level motion controller that can be used zones. Additionally, underwater localization and positioning to enhance underwater glider control systems or easily modified and path planning in high risk areas will be improved. for additional sensing, computing, or other requirements for ROUGHIE is 1 m long and weighs 12 kg (payload 1 kg) advanced automation design testing.The ultimate goal is to have with minimum operating endurance of 8 hours and maximum a fleet of modular and inexpensive test platforms for addressing depth of 40 m. At 10% of the cost of commercial underwater the issues that currently limit the use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Producing a low-cost vehicle with maneuvering gliders, a ROUGHIE fleet is affordable without compromis- capabilities and a straightforward expansion path will permit easy ing the sophisticated control systems and maneuverability experimentation and testing of different approaches to improve (See the detailed characteristics in Table I). underwater automation. In this paper, the mechanical and electrical components of the ROUGHIE are introduced in Section I as a plant for the INTRODUCTION controller design.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday Morning, 30 November 2016 Lehua, 8:00 A.M
    WEDNESDAY MORNING, 30 NOVEMBER 2016 LEHUA, 8:00 A.M. TO 9:05 A.M. Session 3aAAa Architectural Acoustics and Speech Communication: At the Intersection of Speech and Architecture II Kenneth W. Good, Cochair Armstrong, 2500 Columbia Ave., Lancaster, PA 17601 Takashi Yamakawa, Cochair Yamaha Corporation, 10-1 Nakazawa-cho, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 430-8650, Japan Catherine L. Rogers, Cochair Dept. of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, USF, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., PCD1017, Tampa, FL 33620 Chair’s Introduction—8:00 Invited Papers 8:05 3aAAa1. Vocal effort and fatigue in virtual room acoustics. Pasquale Bottalico, Lady C. Cantor Cutiva, and Eric J. Hunter (Commu- nicative Sci. and Disord., Michigan State Univ., 1026 Red Cedar Rd., Lansing, MI 48910, [email protected]) Vocal effort is a physiological entity that accounts for changes in voice production as vocal loading increases, which can be quanti- fied in terms of Sound Pressure Level (SPL). It may have implications on potential vocal fatigue risk factors. This study investigates how vocal effort is affected by room acoustics. The changes in the acoustic conditions were artificially manipulated. Thirty-nine subjects were recorded while reading a text, 15 out of them used a conversational style while 24 were instructed to read as if they were in a class- room full of children. Each subject was asked to read in three different reverberation time RT (0.4 s, 0.8 s, and 1.2 s), in two noise condi- tions (background noise at 25 dBA and Babble noise at 61 dBA), in three different auditory feedback levels (-5 dB, 0 dB, and 5 dB), for a total of 18 tasks per subject presented in a random order.
    [Show full text]
  • Navegación Y Control De Un Mini Veh´Iculo Submarino Autónomo
    CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION´ Y DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO´ NACIONAL UNIDAD ZACATENCO DEPARTAMENTO DE CONTROL AUTOMATICO´ Navegaci´on y control de un mini veh´ıculo submarino aut´onomo TESIS Que presenta M. en C. Iv´an Torres Tamanaja Para obtener el grado de DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS EN LA ESPECIALIDAD DE CONTROL AUTOMATICO´ Directores de Tesis: Dr. Jorge Antonio Torres Mu˜noz Dr. Rogelio Lozano Leal MEXICO´ DISTRITO FEDERAL AGOSTO DEL 2013. El riego de nadar entre tiburones, no son los tiburones. El verdadero riesgo es sangrar mientras lo haces. (I.T.T.) A la memoria de mi Chan´ın. Q.E.P.D. Dedicatoria A mis padres: Sa´ul Torres Jim´enez Guillermina Tamanaja Ram´ırez Por su palabras de aliento, por la confianza que siempre me han dado, porque son el refugio en mis momentos de duda, porque con nada pago el gran amor y cari˜no que me profesan sin esperar nada a cambio. Por ser una gu´ıa, ejemplo y motor impulsor en mi vida. A mis hermanas: Ivonne e Ivette Qu´epor todo y sobre todo han mostrado ser las mejores hermanas, porque demuestran su afecto y cari˜no con las cosas m´as b´asicas. A mis sobrinos: Iv´an Santiago David Con sus sonrisas me recuerdan que la vida es un juego. Agradecimientos A Dios, que me da la oportunidad de abrir los ojos a un nuevo d´ıatodos los d´ıas. Al CONACYT, por otorgarme una beca para poder realizar mis estudios de docto- rado. Al Dr. Pedro Castillo Garcia, que con su estilo muy particular de aconsejar..
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Endurance Maritime Surveillance with Ocean Glider Networks
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2015-09 Long-endurance maritime surveillance with ocean glider networks Nott, Bradley J. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/47308 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS LONG-ENDURANCE MARITIME SURVEILLANCE WITH OCEAN GLIDER NETWORKS by Bradley J. Nott September 2015 Thesis Advisor: John E. Joseph Second Reader: Tetyana Margolina Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704–0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2015 Master’s thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS LONG-ENDURANCE MARITIME SURVEILLANCE WITH OCEAN GLIDER NETWORKS 6. AUTHOR(S) Nott, Bradley J. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943–5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND 10. SPONSORING / ADDRESS(ES) MONITORING AGENCY N/A REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Undersea Technologies
    Monday 9th May 2016, at the National Liberal Club, Whitehall British Pugwash workshop: Emerging Undersea Technologies Report by British Pugwash authored by: Carol Naughton, Senior Research Fellow and Sebastian Brixey-Williams, Researcher Introduction The workshop brought together seventeen scientists, technical experts and academics from the US and UK to assess current and emerging undersea technologies, their likely future direction of travel, and the implications of developments in sensing, computing and communications for the undersea battle space. The morning sessions concentrated on developments in underwater sensing and communications technologies and advances in marine robotic vehicles. The afternoon session focussed on the implications of these for the deployment, strategy and modalities of SSBNs. The day began with a short video overview of this subject Seaexplorer underwater glider diving Photo (cc) by Yann le Page taken, with his permission, from Bryan Clark’s presentation of his The conclusion of the above report states: 1 report, “The Emerging Era in Undersea Warfare”. “The emerging era in undersea competition to the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary will require a significant rethinking of how Assessments (CSBA) in January 2015 military forces conduct undersea warfare. A former US submariner, Bryan Clark was, Dramatic changes are occurring in the until 2013, Special Assistant to the US Chief of technological realm that should inform new Naval Operations and Director of his operational concepts, which will have Commander’s Action Group, where he led significant implications for kinds of development of the US Navy strategy and undersea capabilities that should be implemented new initiatives in electromagnetic developed and the ways in which larger spectrum operations, undersea warfare and naval and joint forces should evolve to expeditionary operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Gliders: Mission Profiles and Utilisation Strategies in the Mediterranean Sea
    2019 IMEKO TC-19 International Workshop on Metrology for the Sea Genoa, Italy, October 3-5, 2019 Underwater Gliders: Mission Profiles and Utilisation Strategies in the Mediterranean Sea Enrico Petritoli1, Fabio Leccese1, Marco Cagnetti1 1 Science Department, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre” Via Della Vasca Navale n°84, 00146, Roma, Italy, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract – The final aim of this paper is to create The Sea is located at mid-latitudes between Europe, Asia peculiar strategies in order to optimise the use platform and Africa and is an enclosed sea, communicating with the for underwater scientific research that can Atlantic Ocean to the west across the Strait of Gibraltar accommodate a wide range of different payloads. The and with the Sea of Marmara and the Black Sea to the east main mission profiles and the related employment across the strait of the Dardanelles. In the Mediterranean strategies are optimized, according to the dedicated Sea occurs almost all of the bio-geophysical processes like environment: we will examine in detail the three types the great oceans occur so it can be considered a "sea of typical mission (pure drift, corrected drift and laboratory". glider) finally a hybrid one (Jellyfish). It can be subdivided into two large sub-basins, the Western and the Eastern Mediterranean linked together by Keywords — Mission, Profiles, Autonomous, the Strait of Sicily, which exhibit a noteworthy Underwater, Glider, AUV. bathygraphy difference, which prevents the free circulation of great volumes of water. I. INTRODUCTION The final aim of this paper is to create peculiar strategies in order to optimise the use platform for underwater scientific research that can accommodate a wide range of different payloads.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Keeping with an Autonomous Underwater Glider Using A
    Appears in Proc. AI in the Oceans and Space Workshop, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Melbourne, Australia, August 2017. Station Keeping with an Autonomous Underwater Glider Using a Predictive Model of Ocean Currents Andrew Branch1, Martina Troesch1, Mar Flexas2, Andrew Thompson2, John Ferrara3, Yi Chao3, Steve Chien1 3 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2California Institute of Technology 3Remote Sensing Solutions Correspondence Author: [email protected] Abstract time, and can travel horizontally at approximately 0.25 m/s. [Hodges and Fratantoni 2009] and [Rudnick, Johnston, and We investigate the use of an autonomous underwater glider as Sherman 2013] both used gliders as virtual moorings with a platform for a virtual mooring. Our approach uses a simple vehicle motion model, a predictive model of ocean currents, some success. [Hodges and Fratantoni 2009] achieved an and a greedy search algorithm in order to simulate possible average distance from the mooring location of 2.0 km and actions available to the vehicle and select an action to mini- [Rudnick, Johnston, and Sherman 2013] achieved an aver- mize the distance from the target point. Results from a 19 day age distance of 3.6 km and 1.8 km in two separate experi- experiment in October 2016 near Monterey Bay are presented ments. where we test our control algorithm as well as investigate the Our approach to station keeping uses a greedy search al- effect of a glider’s dive profile on its ability to act as a virtual gorithm and a predictive model of ocean currents in order mooring.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Chapter 5 Autonomous Maritime Asymmetric Systems [Hood]
    5. Chapter 5 Autonomous Maritime Asymmetric Systems [Hood] Student Learning Objectives 1. Students will be able to understand what asymmetric warfare is and how autonomous underwater systems can be utilized to conduct it. 2. Current applications for autonomous maritime vehicles. 3. Introduction to emerging AUV / UUV technologies and programs that will allow the student to better understand the potential for growing threats. Asymmetry in Warfare: War between belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly, or whose strategy or tactics differ significantly. This is typically a war between a standing, professional army and an insurgency or resistance movement militias who often have status of unlawful combatants. Asymmetric warfare can describe a conflict in which the resources of two belligerents differ in essence and, in the struggle, interact and attempt to exploit each other’s characteristic weaknesses. Such struggles often involve strategies and tactics of unconventional warfare, the weaker combatants attempting to use strategy to offset deficiencies in quantity or quality of their forces and equipment. (Thomas, 2010) Such strategies may not necessarily be militarized. (Stepanova, 2016) This is in contrast to symmetric warfare, where two powers have comparable military power and resources and rely on tactics that are similar overall, differing only in details and execution. (Thomas, 2010) 130 | Chapter 5 Autonomous Maritime Asymmetric Systems This chapter was written to expose the reader to current and envisioned autonomous maritime technologies under development. The likes of which could potentially be used in non-standard or asymmetric methods. With the unspoken goal of possibly subvert or attack US naval forces and the Department of Homeland Security.
    [Show full text]