DOCSLIB.ORG

GDR 00.1-001 January 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GDR 00.1-001 January 2014 GDR 00.1-001 January 2014 Ground Investigation Report Ground Investigation Report January 2014 GDR 00.1-001 Femern A/S Vester Søgade 10 1601 København V Tel.: +45 3341 6300 Fax.: +45 3341 6301 www.femern.com CVR no. 28 98 65 64 Prepared by Rambøll Arup Joint Venture c/o Rambøll Danmark A/S Hannemanns Allé 53 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Danmark Phone +45 51611000 Rambøll Arup Joint Venture Danish reg. no: CVR-NR 31749077 Member of FRI This report is based on the geological/geotechnical knowledge gathered and evaluated by Femern A/S until January 2014. Prepared JRF, GLH, NLSM, 2014-01-31 CH, UTN Checked PM 2014-01-31 Approved JRF 2014-01-31 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 9 2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 12 2.1 Activities ......................................................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Seismic surveys .............................................................................................. 12 2.1.2 Boring campaigns ........................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Geophysical borehole logging ........................................................................ 12 2.1.4 Advanced laboratory testing ........................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Large scale testing .......................................................................................... 13 2.1.6 Seismicity ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Investigation Results ....................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 The Quaternary ............................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 The Palaeogene ............................................................................................... 15 2.2.3 The Cretaceous ............................................................................................... 15 2.2.4 Glacial tectonics.............................................................................................. 16 2.2.5 Salt tectonics ................................................................................................... 16 2.2.6 Geotechnical parameters ................................................................................. 16 2.3 Positioning System ......................................................................................... 17 3 Positioning System ......................................................................................... 18 3.1 General ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 18 4 Offshore Geophysical Investigations .............................................................. 20 4.1 General ............................................................................................................ 20 4.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 21 5 Onshore Geophysical Investigations .............................................................. 22 5.1 General ............................................................................................................ 22 5.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 22 5.2.1 Onshore Seismic ............................................................................................. 22 5.2.2 Continuous Vertical Electrical Sounding (CVES) ......................................... 22 6 Borings and Cone Penetration Tests (CPTUs) ............................................... 24 6.1 General ............................................................................................................ 24 6.2 Offshore Type C Borings, Fehmarnbelt ......................................................... 24 6.2.1 General ............................................................................................................ 24 6.2.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 25 6.3 Onshore Type A and Type B Borings, Lolland and Fehmarn ........................ 25 6.3.1 General ............................................................................................................ 25 6.3.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 25 6.4 Offshore Type A and Type B Borings, Fehmarnbelt ..................................... 26 6.4.1 General ............................................................................................................ 26 6.4.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 26 3 6.5 Sample Handling and Laboratory Classification Works ................................ 27 6.5.1 General ............................................................................................................ 27 6.5.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 27 6.6 Correlation Borings Lillebælt ......................................................................... 28 6.7 Correlation Borings Fehmarnsund .................................................................. 28 7 Geophysical Borehole Logging ...................................................................... 29 7.1 General ............................................................................................................ 29 7.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 29 8 Advanced Laboratory Testing ........................................................................ 31 8.1 General ............................................................................................................ 31 8.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 32 8.2.1 General ............................................................................................................ 32 8.2.2 Oedometer Testing.......................................................................................... 32 8.2.3 Triaxial Testing ............................................................................................... 34 8.2.4 Geological Dating of Samples ........................................................................ 35 9 Large Scale Testing ........................................................................................ 36 9.1 General ............................................................................................................ 36 9.2 Equipment and Procedures ............................................................................. 37 9.2.1 Trial Excavation Works and Surveys ............................................................. 37 9.2.2 Instrumentation and Monitoring ..................................................................... 37 9.2.3 CPTUs and Block Sampling ........................................................................... 38 9.2.4 Plate Load Testing .......................................................................................... 38 9.2.5 Pile Installation and Tension Load Testing .................................................... 39 9.2.6 Ground Anchor Installation and Tension Load Testing ................................. 40 10 Ground Conditions ......................................................................................... 42 10.1 Geologic Setting ............................................................................................. 42 10.1.1 Morphology and Seismic Stratigraphy ........................................................... 42 10.2 Salt Pillow Structures ..................................................................................... 43 10.3 Seismicity ....................................................................................................... 45 10.4 Ground Water Conditions ............................................................................... 46 10.4.1 Lolland ............................................................................................................ 46 10.4.2 Fehmarn .......................................................................................................... 47 10.5 The Series of Layers ....................................................................................... 48 11 Postglacial and Lateglacial Deposits .............................................................. 49 11.1 Geological Description ................................................................................... 49 11.2 Geotechnical Properties .................................................................................. 50 11.2.1 General ............................................................................................................ 50 11.2.2 Classification Properties ................................................................................. 50 11.2.3 CPTU .............................................................................................................. 51 11.2.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Borrow Pit Volumes**
    EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION AND LAYOUT **BORROW PIT VOLUMES** When trying to figure out Borrow Pit Problems you need to understand a few things. 1. Water can be added or removed from soil 2. The MASS of the SOLIDS CAN NOT be changed 3. Need to know phase relationships in soil….which I will show you next Phase relationship in Soil This represents the soil that you take from a borrow pit. It is made up of AIR, WATER, and SOLIDS. AIR WATER So if you separated the soil into its components it would look like this. It is referred to as a Soil Phase Diagram. SOIL When looking at a Soil Phase Diagram you think of it two ways, 1. Volume, 2. Mass. Volume Mass Va AIR Ma = 0 Va = Volume Air Ma = Mass Air = 0 V WATER M Vw = Volume Water w w Mw = Mass Water Vs = Volume Solid Ms = Mass Solid Vs SOIL Ms Vt = Volume Total = Va + Vw + Vs Mt = Mass Total = Mw + Ms EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION AND LAYOUT **BORROW PIT VOLUMES** Basic Terms/Formulas to know – Soil Phase relationship Specific Gravity = the density of the solids divided by the density of Water Moisture Content = Mass of Water divided by the Mass of Solids Void Ratio = Volume of Voids divided by the Volume of Solids Porosity = Volume of Voids divided by the Total Volume, Higher porosity = higher permeability Density of Water = γwater = Mw/Vw Specific Gravity = Gs = γsolids /γwater =M /(V * γ ) English Units = 62.42 pounds per CF(pcf) s s water SI Units = 1,000 g/liter = 1,000kg/m3 Moisture Content (w) = Mw/Ms Porosity (n) = Vv/Vt Vv = Volume of Voids = Vw + Va Vt = Total Volume = Vs +Vw + Va Degree of Saturation
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Plugging of Open-Ended Piles During Impact Driving in Cohesion-Less Soil
    Soil Plugging of Open-Ended Piles During Impact Driving in Cohesion-less Soil VICTOR KARLOWSKIS Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2014 © Victor Karlowskis 2014 Master of Science thesis 14/13 Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Division of Soil and Rock Mechanics ABSTRACT Abstract During impact driving of open-ended piles through cohesion-less soil the internal soil column may mobilize enough internal shaft resistance to prevent new soil from entering the pile. This phenomena, referred to as soil plugging, changes the driving characteristics of the open-ended pile to that of a closed-ended, full displacement pile. If the plugging behavior is not correctly understood, the result is often that unnecessarily powerful and costly hammers are used because of high predicted driving resistance or that the pile plugs unexpectedly such that the hammer cannot achieve further penetration. Today the user is generally required to model the pile response on the basis of a plugged or unplugged pile, indicating a need to be able to evaluate soil plugging prior to performing the drivability analysis and before using the results as basis for decision. This MSc. thesis focuses on soil plugging during impact driving of open-ended piles in cohesion-less soil and aims to contribute to the understanding of this area by evaluating models for predicting soil plugging and driving resistance of open-ended piles. Evaluation was done on the basis of known soil plugging mechanisms and practical aspects of pile driving. Two recently published models, one for predicting the likelihood of plugging and the other for predicting the driving resistance of open-ended piles, were compared to existing models.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qljarter Century of Geotechnical Researcll
    A QlJarter Century of Geotechnical Researcll PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-RD-98-139 FEBRUARY 1999 1111111111111111111111111111111 PB99-147365 \c-c.J/t).:.. L~.i' . u.s. D~~~~~~~Co~~~~~erce~ Natronal_Tec~nical Information Service u.s. DepartillCi"li of Transportation Spnngfleld, Virginia 22161 Research, Development & Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD This report summarizes Federal Highway Administration (FHW!\) geotechnical research and development activities during the past 25 years. The report incl!Jde~: significant accomplishments in the areas of bridge foundations, ground improvenl::::nt, and soil and rock behavior. A fourth category included important miscellaneous efrorts tl'12t did not fit the areas mentioned. The report vlill be useful to re~earchers and praGtitior,c:;rs in geotechnology. --------:"--; /~ /1 I~t(./l- /-~~:r\ .. T. Paul Teng (j Director, Office of Infrastructure Research, Development. and Technologv NOTiCE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States G~)\fernm8nt assumes no liahillty for its contt?!nts or use thereof. Thir. report dor~s not constiil)tl":: a standard, specification, or regu!p,tion. The; United States Government does not endorse products or n18;1ufaGturers, Traderrlc,rks or nianufacturers' narl1es appear in thi;-, report only bec:8'I)Se they arc considered essential to tile object of the document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-RD-98-139 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Quarter Century of Geotechnical Research February 1999 6. Performing Organization Code ).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Peripheral Velocity on Measurements of Undrained Shear Strength for an Artificial Soil
    Estimated Time to Failure, t (minutes) f 104 1000 100 10 1 0.1 2.0 u0 /s Rate Effect Model u β = 0.10 β s /s = (v /v ) u u0 p p0 1.5 0.05 1.0 Typical 0.5 Typical Range of Range of Interest for Wave Interest for Reference Rate & Storm Loading Earthquake ~ 3.4 mm/min Loading Norm. Undrained Shear Strength, s Strength, Shear Undrained Norm. 0.0 0.0100 0.100 1.00 10.0 100 103 Peripheral Velocity, v (mm/min) p Symbol Reference Soil This Work Bentonite-Kaolinite Mix Perlow & Richards, 1977 San Diego Clay Wiesel, 1973 Ska Edeby Tortensson, 1977 Backebol Tortensson, 1977 Askim Schapery & Dunlap, 1978 Gulf Mexico INFLUENCE OF PERIPHERAL VELOCITY ON UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF A BENTONITE- KAOLINITE MIXTURE by Giovanna Biscontin and Juan M. Pestana Geotechnical Engineering Report No UCB/GT/99-19 November 1999 Revised in December 2000 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Berkeley ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................................................................II INFLUENCE OF PERIPHERAL VELOCITY ON MEASUREMENTS OF UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH FOR AN ARTIFICIAL SOIL..............................................................................................................1 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Newmark Sliding Block Model for Predicting the Seismic Performance of MARK Vegetated Slopes ⁎ T
    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 101 (2017) 27–40 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/soildyn Newmark sliding block model for predicting the seismic performance of MARK vegetated slopes ⁎ T. Liang, J.A. Knappett ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper presents a simplified procedure for predicting the seismic slip of a vegetated slope. This is important Analytical modelling for more precise estimation of the hazard associated with seismic landslip of naturally vegetated slopes, and also Centrifuge modelling as a design tool for determining performance improvement when planting is to be used as a protective measure. Dynamics The analysis procedure consists of two main components. Firstly, Discontinuity Layout Optimisation (DLO) Earthquakes analysis is used to determine the critical seismic slope failure mechanism and estimate the corresponding yield Sand acceleration of a given slope. In DLO analysis, a modified rigid perfectly plastic (Mohr–Coulomb) model is Slopes Vegetation employed to approximate small permanent deformations which may accrue in non-associative materials when Ecological Engineering subjected to ground motions with relatively low peak ground acceleration. The contribution of the vegetation to enhancing the yield acceleration is obtained via subtraction of the fallow slope yield acceleration. The second stage of the analysis incorporates the vegetation contribution to the slope's yield acceleration from DLO into modified limit equilibrium equations to further account for the geometric hardening of the slope under in- creasing soil movement. Thereby, the method can predict the permanent settlement at the crest of the slope via a slip-dependent Newmark sliding block approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Kania, J.K., Sorensen, K.K., and Fellenius, B.H., 2020. Analysis of a Static Loading Test on an Instrumented CFA Pile in Silt and Sand
    Kania, J.K., Sorensen, K.K., and Fellenius, B.H., 2020. Analysis of a static loading test on an instrumented CFA pile in silt and sand. International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, 5(3) 170-181. doi: 10.4417/IJGCH-05-03-03 Analysis of a Static Loading Test on an Instrumented Cased CFA Pile in Silt and Sand Jakub G. Kania, Ph.D., cp test a/s / Aarhus University, Vejle/Aarhus, Denmark; email: [email protected] Kenny Kataoka Sørensen, Associate Professor, Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; email: [email protected] Bengt H. Fellenius, Consulting Engineer, Sidney, BC, Canada, V8L 2B9; email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A static loading test was performed on an instrumented 630 mm diameter, 12.5 m long, cased continuous flight auger (CFA) pile. The soil at the site consisted of a 4.0 m thick layer of loose sandy and silty fill layer underlain by a 1.6 m thick layer of dense silty sand and sand followed by dense sand to depth below the pile toe level. The instrumentation comprised vibrating wire strain gages at 1.0, 5.8, 9.4, and 12.0 m depth. The pile stiffness (EA) was determined by the secant and tangent methods and used in back-calculating the distributions of axial load in the pile. A t-z/q-z simulation of the test was fitted to the load-movement distributions of the pile head, gage levels, and pile toe. The load-movement response for the shaft resistance was strain-hardening. The records indicated presence of residual force.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 6D-1 Embankment Construction
    6D-1 Design Manual Chapter 6 - Geotechnical 6D - Embankment Construction Embankment Construction A. General Information Quality embankment construction is required to maintain smooth-riding pavements and to provide slope stability. Proper selection of soil, adequate moisture control, and uniform compaction are required for a quality embankment. Problems resulting from poor embankment construction have occasionally resulted in slope stability problems that encroach on private property and damage drainage structures. Also, pavement roughness can result from non-uniform support. The costs for remediation of such failures are high. Soils available for embankment construction in Iowa generally range from A-4 soils (ML, OL), which are very fine sands and silts that are subject to frost heave, to A-6 and A-7 soils (CL, OH, MH, CG), which predominate across the state. The A-6 and A-7 groups include shrink/swell clayey soils. In general, these soils rate from poor to fair in suitability as subgrade soils. Because of their abundance, economics dictate that these soils must be used on the projects even though they exhibit shrink/swell properties. Because these are marginal soils, it is critical that the embankments be placed with proper compaction and moisture content, and in some cases, stabilization (see Section 6H-1 - Foundation Improvement and Stabilization). Soils for embankment projects are identified during the exploration phase of the construction process. Borings are taken periodically along the proposed route and at potential borrow pits. The soils are tested to determine their engineering properties. Atterberg limits are determined and in-situ moisture and density are compared to standard Proctor values.
    [Show full text]
  • US5109702.Pdf
    |||||||||I|| US00509702A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,109,702 Charlie et al. 45) Date of Patent: . May 5, 1992 (54) METHOD FOR DETERMINING LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL OF FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS COHESIONLESS SOLS 124840 2/1986 U.S.S.R. .................................. 73/84 (75) Inventors: Wayne A. Charlie, Fort Collins, Primary Examiner-Robert Raevis Colo.; Leo W. Butler, Green Bay, Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Thomas C. Stover; Donald J. Wis. Singer (57) ABSTRACT 73) Assignee: The United States of America as A method for determining the liquefaction potential of represented by the Secretary of the cohesionless (granular) soils is provided in which a Air Force, Washington, D.C. rotational shear vane assembly having a plurality of radially disposed blades (herein a Piezovane) is (21) Appl. No.: 549,888 mounted to a shaft having a porewater pressure trans ducer mounted to such assembly and communicating to 22 Filed: Jun. 27, 1990 an outer edge of at least one the blades, with a torque (51) Int. C. ............................................... G01N3/00 transducer mounted to such shaft and a potentiometer 52 U.S. C. ........................................................ 73/84 connected to an upper portion of the shaft to measure Field of Search .................................... 73/784, 84 rotational displacement of such blades. The vane assem (58) bly blades are inserted into undisturbed soil and rotated (56) References Cited one or more turns to obtain porewater pressure re sponse measurements from the soil shear surface de U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS fined by the blade ends along with torque and rotational 3,456,509 7/1969 Thordarson .......................... 73/406 displacement measurements. A porewater pressure in 3,561,259 2/1971 Barendse ..
    [Show full text]
  • Issue No 14, July/August 2019
    FT / PHOTOBOOTH FT / NEWS FT / STEQ Take a look at the best Keep up-to-date with the Recognising Safety, photographs captured by latest news and updates Training, Environment and you on projects, fleet and Quality across the business machinery and employees Aarsleff JULY/AUGUST 2019 ISSUE NO.14 STAFF NEWSLETTER WELCOME Welcome to Aarsleff Ground Engineering’s newsletter. Driven Precast Piling, Bicker, Triton Knoll I would like to open by welcoming Graduate Civil Engineer, order to survive. In this uncertain time, I need everyone Samuel Saul, and placement student Henry Lewis-Borrell to commit to winning projects, delivering them to the high back to Aarsleff after their previous work placements with quality we continue to promote, and all with a strong focus us in 2018. It is great to see the young and upcoming talent on collaboration and communication. joining Aarsleff. And the fact that they are returning to us I know we are excellent at what we do, and don’t just take also says a lot of great things about the culture we have my word on that. We won ‘Civil Engineering Project of the developed here. Year’ for our work at Riverside Rochdale and received a highly …Kevin Hague, Managing Director As I have discussed in previous newsletters and Staff Chat commended for our people development skills in this year’s meetings this year; there are still many uncertainties in East Midlands Celebration Construction Awards. We also the everchanging market, and we are facing a lot more received two highly commended awards for ‘Employer of the competition than we have ever had before.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Mechanics
    Soil Mechanics Soil is the most misunderstood term in the field. The problem arises in the reasons for which different groups or professions study soils. Soil scientists are interested in soils as a medium for plant growth. So soil scientists focus on the organic rich part of the soils horizon and refer to the sediments below the weathered zone as parent material. Classification is based on physical, chemical, and biological properties that can be observed and measured. Soils engineers think of a soil as any material that can be excavated with a shovel (no heavy equipment). Classification is based on the particle size, distribution, and the plasticity of the material. These classification criteria more relate to the behavior of soils under the application of load - the area where we will concentrate. Soil Mechanics Most geologists fall somewhere in between. Geologists are interested in soils and weathering processes as indicators of past climatic conditions and in relation to the geologic formation of useful materials ranging from clay to metallic ore deposits. Geologists usually refer to any loose material below the plant growth zone as sediment or unconsolidated material. The term unconsolidated is also confusing to engineers because consolidation specifically refers to the compression of saturated soils in soils engineering. 1 Soil Mechanics Engineering Properties of Soil The engineering approach to the study of soil focuses on the characteristics of soils as construction materials and the suitability of soils to withstand the load applied by structures of various types. Weight-Volume Relationship Earth materials are three-phase systems. In most applications, the phases include solid particles, water, and air.
    [Show full text]
  • Limitations of Cyclic Pile Load Tests by Kentledge System in Soft Clay Soil
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES 7 (2020) 605–612 605 Research Paper Limitations of cyclic pile load tests by kentledge system in soft clay soil Lan V.H. Bach a,*, Dan V. Tran a a Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Architecture Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T The paper describes the inadequacies of cycled head-down load tests on two barrettes and Article history: one bored pile installed in soft clay soil region in Binh Thanh district, and district 7, Ho Received : 7 December 2020 Chi Minh City, Vietnam, respectively. The soil profile of these sites consisted of layers of Revised : 17 December 2020 organic soft clay and silt from 22.5 m to 28.6 m depth on compact silty sand or semi-stiff to stiff clays to about 60 m depth and followed by dense to very dense sand. The cross- Accepted : 17 December 2020 section area of two barrettes located on the Tan Cang complex area was 2,800 mm by 800 mm, which were constructed using the bucket drill technique with bentonite slurry into 65 m depth. The bored pile of the Lakeside project in district 7 having a pile diameter was Keywords: 1200 mm and 80 m depth. All instrumented piles were attached from ten to eleven strain gages levels along the pile shaft to record the deformation data during the load tests. The Static load test strain data analysis shows that the shaft frictions of pile portions located in the soft clay soil regions were increased dramatically, and the base resistances were smaller expected Cycled head-down load test by the setting-up of Kentledge and the cyclic loading tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Boring Logs and Laboratory Test Results
    #$%& '( !" #$%& '( !" - #%(:;< ;& $ 6"74 2 25#' +-,##%(: <<< <& $ 6"745#' 25#'6"74 +#!%(: = =& 22 , 6"74 225#'6"74 -39#-3' -%(:=;< AAB(:; 6"7422 =B(:; =& , 6"745#' 6"74225#' - # 8 (?%(:; = & $ 6"745#'1( 1(22 1(225#' #'%(:< @ ;& $ 6"745#'1( 1(225#'6"74 4?+-1 ?%(:;@A <& 21(22 $ 6"745#'2%1(22& 21(225#'6"74 :-###%(: = & 6"7421(22 $ 6"745#'2 %1(22 & 6"7421(225#' /##%(:A ; & ,#%(: & , 6"745#'1( 1( 1(5#' ,#C--%(:; =<D E& , 6"745#'1( 1(5#'6"74 21( > #3,-##3,-##1 ? , 6"745#'2 21(5#'6"74 %1(22& %(/(@A 3(/(A & 6"7421( , 6"745#'2 %1(22 & 6"7421(5#' ,# 1 ?%(: < & ,--:# 1(26"74 /"612 /"6125#' ,*#,## 1(26"745#' /"6125#'6"74 2/"612 " 7%(:< & 2426"74 2/"6125#'6"74 6"742/"612 4>!#%(: AA& 2426"745#' 6"742/"6125#' +96!#%(/( =& 1(232426"74 /"611( '*#%(:; ;& /"611(5#' 1(232426"745#' /"611(5#'6"74 5,##%(:; ;= <& 2/"611( ,*#(! $ 2/"611(5#'6"74 6"742/"611( 89 +-- %(: == =& $ 5#'6"74 6"742/"611(5#' 89 +-- "*%(:A<@ A & , 0#2 8- # 8 (? 0#25#' %(:@ <& , 5#'6"74 0#25#'6"74 29#2 8#$'#%(:; = ;& $ 5#'1( 29#25#'6"74 7'%(/(< A=D ;E& 6"7429#2 $ 5#'1( 6"74 6"7429#25#' $ 5#'2%1(22& 4-#1( 4-#1(5#' $ 5#'2 6"74 %1(22 6"74& 4-#1(5#'6"74 2-#1( , 5#'1( 2-#1(5#'6"74 6"742-#1( # ,##(-#%,(& , 5#'1( 6"74 6"742-#1(5#' , 5#'2%1(22& /"619#2 /"619#25#' , 5#'2 6"74 %1(22 6"74& /"619#25#'6"74 # 9+ 2/"619#2 1(2 2/"619#25#'6"74 6"742/"619#2 1(25#'6"74 6"742/"619#25#' : 9 9+ 242 /"61-#1( /"61-#1(5#' 2425#'6"74 /"61-#1(5#'6"74 2-#4(11( '( ,-#+ 1(23242 2/"61-#1(5#'6"74 6"742/"61-#1( 1(232425#'6"74 6"742/"61-#1(5#' /"61/1 )"* ."* ,4( /"61/15#' /"61/15#'6"74 2/"61/1 /4 2/"61/15#'6"74 *+ /#'%-*-& /4 /84" 6"742/"61/1 /84" 6"742/"61/15#' 0-#$#!" % & ##$#!" %-'# #& "# ! ##$#!" % #& ) * # ('--+#9#'+#++ ,*'-##-319#' +F# -' ##'5#'#'#+#9+# ,# #+##('--++-##'#9#'- ##'#9 -9 #- 99##'#- '##'-#5#'#'+--9#(' #+-# --+9#9# #-# 5A ) ,0.,2 +,.
    [Show full text]