DOCSLIB.ORG

Graduate Student Interviews -- Andrew Roscoe and the 24Th Michigan at Gettysburg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Graduate Student Interviews -- Andrew Roscoe and the 24Th Michigan at Gettysburg H-CivWar Graduate Student Interviews -- Andrew Roscoe and the 24th Michigan at Gettysburg Discussion published by John Legg on Wednesday, February 10, 2021 Hello H-CivWar subscribers, Today we’re joined by Andrew Roscoe, a recent graduate of Norwich University’s graduate program, to chat about his Gettysburg Magazine article, “Who Commanded the Iron Brigade at Gettysburg?” You can follow Roscoe on Twitter at @RoscoeHistorian. Hello Andrew, thanks for joining us. Before we get into your essay, could you briefly explain to our readers how you came to this work? What is your positionality that led to your interest in the Iron Brigade at Gettysburg? Was this essay part of your research for your M.A. thesis? AR: Hi, John. Thanks for inviting me to chat on your platform. This article came out of something I found while doing my research for my MA thesis at Norwich University. I researched the 24th Michigan, who fought in its first major battle at Gettysburg with the Iron Brigade, and examined the various factors that resulted in the regiment giving such a stellar combat performance in its first major action and compared and contrasted it to other regiments in the Army of the Potomac. Being from Metro Detroit, I have always had an affinity for the 24th Michigan, but have often found that as an additional replacement assigned to the Iron Brigade after it had already earned fame, it has been often marginalized by histories of the brigade. Along the way, I found a reference on a website purportedly containing letters written to the Governor of Wisconsin from Brig. Gen. James Wadsworth, and another First Corps brigade commander and Iron Brigade alumnus, Brig. Gen. Lysander Cutler. In their letters, they discussed the actions of a member of the Iron Brigade staff in the battle up to essentially commanding the brigade after Meredith was wounded. Since it was not particularly germane to my capstone, I set it aside as something for later. It was an uncited source on a website and we all know that while the internet is a great tool for historians, it requires a high degree of skepticism. Later, I set out to track down the original letters. Even though I could not trust the website, the letters felt authentic in their composition and tone. I contacted the Wisconsin State Archives to see if they could find the original letters in their files, since official letters to Governors are in their collections, but they could not find either. When I reached out to the historical society that administered the website, they pointed me to the source. It was a Grand Army of the Republic—the primary US veterans’ organization after the war—publication The Soldiers and Sailor's Album of Biographical Record for Wisconsin. The book gives brief biographies of notable natives of Wisconsin who fought for the Union. From there, I started digging into the Official Records of the War of the Rebellion to examine the correspondence and reports surrounding the Battle of Gettysburg. Interestingly, I found in Citation: John Legg. Graduate Student Interviews -- Andrew Roscoe and the 24th Michigan at Gettysburg. H-CivWar. 02-11-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4113/discussions/7256668/graduate-student-interviews-andrew-roscoe-and-24th-michigan Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-CivWar Wadsworth's account that he had to actually order the ranking colonel in the brigade, William Robinson of the 7th Wisconsin, to take command of the brigade. Importantly, Wadsworth recorded that he did this only after the First Corps had been driven back to Cemetery Hill late in the day and after fighting had ceased. As I started to read through the reports of other commanders, I could sense there was something that had happened that no one was willing to discuss. So, who commanded the Iron Brigade at Gettysburg? Based on your research, what’s the central argument you’re making in this Gettysburg Magazine article? AR: It appears that after Meredith was wounded, the second most senior colonel, Henry Morrow of the 24th Michigan, and Richardson, together directed the brigade during the critical hours of combat on July 1st 1863. Maj. Gen. Abner Doubleday, then the acting corps commander, recalled in his memoir of the campaign that he directed Morrow to take charge of the regiment, as he mistakenly thought Morrow was the next senior officer after Meredith. Morrow was a veteran of the Mexican War and proved himself to be a talented commander. Later in the war, he rose to command the Iron Brigade and led it ably in combat in the winter of 1864-5. After the war, he was offered a Regular Army commission as a lieutenant colonel and eventually rose to colonel before his death. Morrow also definitely still continued to command the 24th Michigan directly, as is clear from his after-action report and the accounts from his unit. From the 24th Michigan's position in the center of the brigade's position on a knoll, he could easily see the entire brigade. Additionally, Lieutenant Colonel Mark Flannigan and Major Edwin Wight of the regiment were already wounded by that point, so perhaps he felt he had to do both jobs at the same time since there was no officer of sufficient experience to take over the unit if he was commanding the brigade. I think Morrow knew he wasn't supposed to be in command of the brigade, and did his best to do so while not appearing to actually take command. I can find nothing that talks about if Robinson was told he was in command and refused to do so or if he simply did not know that Doubleday was directing orders to Morrow by mistake. Either way, Richardson seems to have aided and abetted Morrow. He was active and moving among the brigade, and delivered orders to the regiments. Robinson recounts Richardson relaying an order to withdraw the 7th Wisconsin back towards Seminary Ridge as the fighting progressed. It is impossible to tell if Morrow and Richardson were actually working in concert or in parallel, but they certainly were not at cross purposes. Morrow was wounded immediately before the brigade made its final stand in front of the Seminary, and at that point, Richardson was as close to a brigade commander as the brigade would have until they reached their rally position. Cutler and Wadsworth's letters mostly refer to his actions in this part of the fighting. Where do you see the future of military history moving to? What’s the importance of studying the units that fought and died during the Civil War, in addition to other important themes of the Civil War, like social, cultural, and environmental history? AR: While models like "War and Society" are in vogue right now within the field, I think that insightful studies of units, campaigns, battles, and actions will always be the bedrock of military history. It is important to look at the broad, national topics that W&S examines, because it has led to greater understanding of many society forces at work during a war. The influence it has had on Citation: John Legg. Graduate Student Interviews -- Andrew Roscoe and the 24th Michigan at Gettysburg. H-CivWar. 02-11-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4113/discussions/7256668/graduate-student-interviews-andrew-roscoe-and-24th-michigan Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-CivWar traditional military historians has been a positive force as well. My own capstone used the lens of demography and social forces to examine the 24th Michigan. I found that the unit was older and more middle-class on average than the typical Civil War regiment. I think that it led to a group of men who recognized more clearly what they were willing to sacrifice and through some superior leadership at the regiment and company levels, translated into battlefield success. However, I think there is a disconnect between W&S and the actual soldiers who did the fighting and with the main audience that consumes military history. Broad societal studies tend to overlook the service of individuals and units in favor of demographic groups. A great unit study should take the reader into who this group of men were, and drive home the complexities of their experience. They were individuals, with their own stories, and the regiment, the brigade, the corps were part of their identity in the army. I think it is important to understand the place of the war in society and within the culture, but it cannot come at the expense of overlooking the stories of the soldiers and civilians caught in the actual fighting. There is an ongoing discussion over the place of military history and if traditional military history or "New Military History" glorify war by simply discussing combat at all. The recent article by Max Hastings in Bloomberg News illustrates this divide. As a historian, I find myself motivated by going to the battlefields and wanting to understand what happened. I dig into a primary account and hear the voice from someone who died long before I was born and feel a living connection to that person, and I want to see what I can do to articulate that story. I think that is a visceral reaction for many people who study and consume history. There is always going to be that person who goes to a place like Chickamauga or Gettysburg and wonders what happened there and who were the people who fought there.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VOL. XLIII, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2003
    VOL. XLIII, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2003 "It wasn't like a battle at all…it was more like Indian warfare," remembered John McClure, a young private in the 14th Indiana Infantry. "I hid behind a tree and looked out. Across the way…was a rebel aiming at me. I put my hat on a stick…and stuck it out from behind the tree-as bait. Then I saw him peep out of the thicket and I shot him. It was the first time I'd ever seen the man I'd killed, and it was an awful feeling." This deadly incident, on May 5, 1864, was only one of such commonplace bloody episodes that occurred in the bitter struggle known as the Wilderness. Beginning in 1864 North and South stood in weary stalemate. All of the Federal victories from the previous year, including Gettysburg and Vicksburg, had seriously weakened the Confederacy, but, it remained bowed, not broken. For the North to win the war, now starting its fourth year, the Confederate armies must be crushed. The South, conversely, had one final hope: stymie the North's plans and count upon a war-weary Northern home front to force the conflict to the peace table. Now in early May of 1864, the two most notable titans of the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, were about to come face-to-face in a final showdown to determine the war's outcome. Grant, whose roller coaster career had nearly ended on several occasions, was given the revitalized rank of Lieutenant General by President Lincoln, and the amazingly difficult task of besting the Army of Northern Virginia, something his predecessors had found nigh impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • 89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015
    89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015 Marker Text One-quarter mile south of this marker is the home of General Solomon A. Meredith, Iron Brigade Commander at Gettysburg. Born in North Carolina, Meredith was an Indiana political leader and post-war Surveyor-General of Montana Territory. Report The Bureau placed this marker under review because its file lacked both primary and secondary documentation. IHB researchers were able to locate primary sources to support the claims made by the marker. The following report expands upon the marker points and addresses various omissions, including specifics about Meredith’s political service before and after the war. Solomon Meredith was born in Guilford County, North Carolina on May 29, 1810.1 By 1830, his family had relocated to Center Township, Wayne County, Indiana.2 Meredith soon turned to farming and raising stock; in the 1850s, he purchased property near Cambridge City, which became known as Oakland Farm, where he grew crops and raised award-winning cattle.3 Meredith also embarked on a varied political career. He served as a member of the Wayne County Whig convention in 1839.4 During this period, Meredith became concerned with state internal improvements: in the early 1840s, he supported the development of the Whitewater Canal, which terminated in Cambridge City.5 Voters next chose Meredith as their representative to the Indiana House of Representatives in 1846 and they reelected him to that position in 1847 and 1848.6 From 1849-1853, Meredith served
    [Show full text]
  • California, Pennsylvania
    66 BOOK REVIEWS JANUARY sentiment had "congealed" prior to the war and (2) that the Grant "coattail" factor was minimal in predicting the final configuration of the black suffrage vote. Mohr does a creditable job of editing, including an excellent in- troduction and a knowledgeable historiographical postscript. These essays, as he suggests, partially filla gap in historiography and serve to encourage others to follow up with additional and/or corrective re- search. This volume, indeed, is now a commendable companion to Richard O. Curry's Radicalism, Racism, and Party Alignment: The Border States during Reconstruction (1969). The gap will not be closed, however, untilthe legislative and voter behavior is analyzed and synthesized withtraditional methodologies. Until then, this collection willact as an important catalyst in many seminars. Department of History J. Kent Folmar California State College California, Pennsylvania The Iron Brigade: A MilitaryHistory, By Alan T. Nolan. (Madi- son: The State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1975. Pp. xii,412. Introduction, preface, prologue, maps, notes, selected bibliography, index. $12.00.) Since it was originally published by Macmillan in 1961 as The Black Hat Brigade, a surfeit of Civil War military histories have filled bookstore shelves. Reissued in 1975 as The Iron Brigade by the State Historical Society of Wisconsin, the book remains a thoroughly researched, reliable, and absorbing account of the best fighting unit in the Union army. The "Iron Brigade/' which was organized near Washington in October 1861, comprised the Second, Sixth, and Seventh Wisconsin volunteer regiments and the Nineteenth Indiana. It was the Army of the Potomac's only completely western brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
    GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Reader
    Course Reader Gettysburg: History and Memory Professor Allen Guelzo The content of this reader is only for educational use in conjunction with the Gilder Lehrman Institute’s Teacher Seminar Program. Any unauthorized use, such as distributing, copying, modifying, displaying, transmitting, or reprinting, is strictly prohibited. GETTYSBURG in HISTORY and MEMORY DOCUMENTS and PAPERS A.R. Boteler, “Stonewall Jackson In Campaign Of 1862,” Southern Historical Society Papers 40 (September 1915) The Situation James Longstreet, “Lee in Pennsylvania,” in Annals of the War (Philadelphia, 1879) 1863 “Letter from Major-General Henry Heth,” SHSP 4 (September 1877) Lee to Jefferson Davis (June 10, 1863), in O.R., series one, 27 (pt 3) Richard Taylor, Destruction and Reconstruction: Personal Experiences of the Late War (Edinburgh, 1879) John S. Robson, How a One-Legged Rebel Lives: Reminiscences of the Civil War (Durham, NC, 1898) George H. Washburn, A Complete Military History and Record of the 108th Regiment N.Y. Vols., from 1862 to 1894 (Rochester, 1894) Thomas Hyde, Following the Greek Cross, or Memories of the Sixth Army Corps (Boston, 1894) Spencer Glasgow Welch to Cordelia Strother Welch (August 18, 1862), in A Confederate Surgeon’s Letters to His Wife (New York, 1911) The Armies The Road to Richmond: Civil War Memoirs of Major Abner R. Small of the Sixteenth Maine Volunteers, ed. H.A. Small (Berkeley, 1939) Mrs. Arabella M. Willson, Disaster, Struggle, Triumph: The Adventures of 1000 “Boys in Blue,” from August, 1862, until June, 1865 (Albany, 1870) John H. Rhodes, The History of Battery B, First Regiment Rhode Island Light Artillery, in the War to Preserve the Union (Providence, 1894) A Gallant Captain of the Civil War: Being the Record of the Extraordinary Adventures of Frederick Otto Baron von Fritsch, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg OOB Source
    Gettysburg OOB Source: Gettysburg 1863 by Carl Smith (Copyright, Osprey Publishing Ltd, 1998) North Union Army of the Potomac (MG George G. Meade) 112,735 total, 95,799 engaged General HQ (Provost Marshal M. Patrick) 1528 Guards & Orderlies (Oneida NY Cav.) 42 93rd NY (detachments) 148 8th U.S. 401 2nd PA Cavalry 489 6th PA (cos. E & I) 81 Regular Cav. Det. From 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 6th U.S. 15 Signal Corps 51 Engineers (not present) ? 15th NY ? 50th NY ? U.S. Battalion of Engineers ? I Corps (MG John F. Reynolds) (MG Abner Doubleday) (MG John Newton) 12596 General HQ 1st Maine Cav. (Co. L) 57 B/121st PA 306 1st Division (BG James S. Wadsworth) 3860 1st (Iron) Brigade (BG Solomon Meredith) (Col. W.W. Robinson) 1829 2nd WI 302 6th WI 344 7th WI 364 19th IN 308 24th MI 496 2nd Brigade (BG Lysander Cutler) 2020 84th NY (14th Brooklyn Militia) 318 147th NY 380 76th NY 375 95th NY 241 56th PA 252 7th IN 437 2nd Division (BG John C. Robinson) 3027 1st Brigade (BG Gabriel R. Paul) 1829 94th NY 411 104th NY 309 11th PA 292 107th PA 255 16th ME 298 13th MA 284 2nd Brigade (MG Henry Baxter) 1198 12th MA 261 83rd NY (9th Militia) 215 97th NY 236 88th PA 274 90th PA 208 3rd Division (MG Abner Doubleday) (BG Thomas A. Rowley) 4711 Provost Guard 149th PA (Co. C) 60 1st Brigade (BG T. Rowley) (Col. Chapman Biddle) 1387 80th NY 287 121st PA 263 142nd PA 362 151st PA 467 2nd "Bucktail" Brigade (Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneath a Northern Sky: a Short History of the Gettysburg Campaign
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2003 Article 6 Beneath a Northern Sky: A Short History of the Gettysburg Campaign Kent Gramm Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Gramm, Kent (2003) "Beneath a Northern Sky: A Short History of the Gettysburg Campaign," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 5 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol5/iss3/6 Gramm: Beneath a Northern Sky: A Short History of the Gettysburg Campaig Review Gramm, Kent Summer 2003 Woodworth, Steven E. Beneath a Northern Sky: A Short History of the Gettysburg Campaign. Scholarly Resources, $14.95 ISBN 842029338 On Union soil Lucid and engrossing narrative offers surprises In Beneath a Northern Sky: A Short History of the Gettysburg Campaign, we have an interesting, fast-paced, and efficient narration of the battle and campaign. The author, Steven E. Woodworth, an associate professor of History at Texas Christian University and general editor of a series of books on the Civil War era, states at the outset that his book relies much more than usual on secondary sources; and the advantages and drawbacks of using relatively few, and recent, books on the subject are readily apparent in Beneath a Northern Sky. Readers should not skip the brief preface, because it both effectively invites readers into what will be an engaging narrative, and alerts him or her to the necessity of thinking critically while reading the narrative. There is a predictable reference to Gettysburg as having spawned a voluminous literature, followed by a valid justification of presenting a new book meant for those just embarking on their study of Gettysburg and those who desire a summary overview of the recent scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Have Never Seen the Like Before”
    “I Have Never Seen the Like Before” Herbst Woods, July 1, 1863 D. Scott Hartwig Of the 160 acres that John Herbst farmed during the summer of 1863, 18 were in a woodlot on the northwestern boundary, adjacent to the farm owned by Edward McPherson. Until July 1, 1863 these woods provided shade for Herbst’s eleven head of cattle, wood for various needs around the farm, and some income. Because of the level of human and animal activity in these woods they were free of undergrowth, except for where they came up against Willoughby Run, a sluggish stream that meandered along their western border. Along this stream willows and brush grew thickly.1 Although Confederate troops passed down the Mummasburg road on June 26 on their way to Gettysburg, either Herbst’s farm was too far off the path of their march, or he was clever about hiding his livestock, for he suffered no losses. His luck at avoiding damage or loss from the Confederate invasion of Pennsylvania began to run out on June 30. It was known that a large force of Confederates had occupied Cashtown on June 29, causing a stir of uneasiness. William Comfort and David Finnefrock, the tenant farmers on the Emmanuel Harmon farm, Herbst’s neighbor west of Willoughby Run, chose to take their horses away to protect them. Herbst and John Slentz, the tenant who farmed the McPherson farm, apparently decided to try their chances and remained on their farms, thinking they stood a better chance of protecting their property if they remained.2 On the morning of June 30 a large Confederate infantry brigade under the command of General James J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gettysburg Campaign: a Contemporary Account by Whitelaw Reid
    I The Gettysburg Campaign: A Contemporary Account by Whitelaw Reid Assignment 1863, June 18 From Philadelphia “Pennsylvania invaded!” “Harrisburg expected to fall!” “Lee’s whole army moving through Chambersburg in three grand columns of attack!” And so on for quantity. Such were the pleasing assurances that began to burst on us in the West on Tuesday morning. All Pennsylvania seemed to be quivering in spasms over the invasion. Pittsburgh suspended business and went to fortifying; veracious gentlemen along the railroad lines and in little villages of the interior rushed to the telegraph offices and did their duty to their country by giving their fears to the wings of the lightning. I was quietly settling myself in comfortable quarters at the Neil House to look on at the counterpart of last week’s Vallandigham Convention1 when dispatches reached me, urging an immediate 1 Reid’s reference is to the Ohio state Democratic convention, which convened in Columbus on June 11 and nominated Clement L. Vallandigham for the gover- norship. A leader of the northern Peace Democrats (often called Copperheads), Vallandigham had been arrested for treason on May 5, 1863, and, following banish- ment to Confederate lines, took up exile in Canada that July. The peace movement in the North gained thousands of adherents in the spring of 1863. 99781405181129_4_001.indd781405181129_4_001.indd 1 99/9/2008/9/2008 88:02:01:02:01 PPMM 2 Two Witnesses at Gettysburg departure for the scene of action. I was well convinced that the whole affair was an immense panic, but the unquestioned movements of Lee and Hooker gave certain promise to something; and besides, whether grounded or groundless, the alarm of invasion was a subject that demanded attention.2 And so, swallowing my disgust at the irregular and unauthorized demonstrations of the rebels, I hastened off.
    [Show full text]
  • A Standard History of Sauk County Wisconsin an Authentic Narrative Of
    CHAPTER XIII MILITARY AFFAIRS SOLDIERS OF THE MEXICAN WAR-JAMES O'RILEZY,, OF REEDSBURG- CHARLES S. LADD, MERRIMACK-CAPT. LEVI MOORE-COL. STEPHEN V. R. ABLEMAN-FIRST CIVIL WAR ORGANIZATIONS-SAUK COUNTY CONTRIBUTES TO THE MADISON GUARDS-INTO CAMP AT CHAMBERS- BURG-BATTLE OF FALLING WATERS, VIRGINIA--RE-ENLISTED- REPRESENTATION IN THE "IRON BRIGADE "-THE SECOND WISCON- SIN INFANTRY-THE SIXTH AND SEVENTH REGIMENTS-THE IRON BRIGADE IN THE WILDERNESS-OTHER RECORDS OF THE BRIGADE- JOSEPH A. WEIRICH--COMPANY D, NINTH REGIMENT--THE ELEVENTH WISCONSIN-THE MARCHING REGIMENT-THE FOUR- TEENTH WISCONSIN-COMPANY H, SEVENTEENTH REGIMENT- COL. JAMES S. ALBAN, OF THE EIGHTEENTH-COMPANY A, NINE- TEENTH REGIMENT-COMPANIES F AND K, OF THE TWENTY-THIRD- COMPANY K, OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH! REGIMENIT-COL, DAVID K. NOYES, FORTY-NINTH REGIMENT-THE CAPTURE OF JEFF DAVIS- JOHN G. KLEINLEIN-THE CAVALRY COMPANIES-COLONEL VITTUM, OF THE THIRD CAVALRY-THE SIXTH BATTERY-MEMORIES OF LIN- COLN-NEWS OF THE ASSASSINATION AT BARABOO-A LINCOLN GUARD OF HONOR-BARABOO TRIPLETS NAMED BY LINCOLN-WHEN THEY SAW LINCOLN-SOLDIERS' MONUMENT AT BARABOO-COL. W. A. WYSE--THE SAUK COUNTY COMPANY; HEADQUARTERS, REEDSBURG -COMPANY A, FIRST WISCONSIN INFANTRY-COMPANY I-THE HONOR LIST. Although there were several residents of Sauk County who served in the Mexican war, and at least one who was a veteran of the Civil war at the time of his death; some, like Colonel Ableman, who had earned a military title in other states, and others whose titles were purely honor- ary (?), and conferred for no known military service, the real history of the county in matters military, commences definitely with the period of the Civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Railroad Cut Reconsidered
    7KH5DLOURDG&XW5HFRQVLGHUHG 5REHUW:6OHGJH Gettysburg Magazine, Number 52, January 2015, pp. 25-40 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI1HEUDVND3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/get.2015.0010 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/get/summary/v052/52.sledge.html Accessed 14 Oct 2015 15:30 GMT The Railroad Cut Reconsidered Robert W. Sledge Th e story of the battle in the railroad cut northwest ing just to their north and began to turn to face the of Gettysburg has been told from several perspec- oncoming southerners. In the meantime, another tives. Th e events of the half hour or so at midday, of Wadsworth’s brigades had come onto the fi eld July 1, 1863, have received so much detailed analysis and entered McPherson’s woods south of the pike. that another article on the subject may seem redun- Th ey were the Black Hats, Brig. Gen. “Long Sol” dant, but there are several matters that could still be Meredith’s famous Iron Brigade of the West. Four of open to reconsideration. these regiments quickly clashed in mortal struggle Th e Battle of Gettysburg began when Maj. Gen. with Archer’s men. Th e Iron Brigade’s other regi- Henry Heth dispatched two Confederate brigades ment, the Sixth Wisconsin, augmented by the Iron toward the town of Gettysburg from his base at Brigade Guard of some one hundred men, was at Cashtown to probe the Union positions. Led by fi rst held in reserve but now double- timed north to Brig. Gen. James J. Archer south of the Cashtown head off the oncoming attack of Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg As a Turning Point Joseph Griffith Cedarville University, [email protected]
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville History Capstone Research Papers Senior Capstone Papers 4-22-2015 A Study of Civil War Leadership: Gettysburg as a Turning Point Joseph Griffith Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Griffith,os J eph, "A Study of Civil War Leadership: Gettysburg as a Turning Point" (2015). History Capstone Research Papers. 3. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones/3 This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Capstone Research Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of Civil War Leadership: Gettysburg as a Turning Point Written and Researched by Joseph Griffith Spring 2015 The Civil War was a pivotal and tragic period in our country’s history. The years that spanned from 1860-1865 were years that were paved with the blood of American men, and what determined whether these men lived or died was the men who led them. Civil War leadership on both sides of the battlefield was critical to the success of the Union and the failure of the Confederacy. Success did not happen overnight, however. The road for the Union was a long and frustrating one, with constant changes in leadership positions and a plague of poor generals. This was not the case for the whole war. The Battle of Gettysburg served as a turning point for the Union, and the Union rode this change to an eventual victory in the war.
    [Show full text]