Jelgava in Figures for 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jelgava in Figures for 2019 Jelgava in figures • 2019 • Dear readers of “Jelgava in figures”! Jelgava – a city for development – has continued its improvement as one of Latvia’s educational, industrial and cultural centers in 2019 as well. A city that encourages business development, offers a wide range of educational opportunities, secure social environment and an active cultural life. Manufacturing and active business life is what promotes economic growth, and our city puts a lot of efforts to make every investor and entrepreneur to feel needed and welcome. By focusing on developing infrastructure, especially in industrial areas, the municipality has managed to take another step forward in arranging and adjusting the business environment, creating preconditions for the restoration of former production facilities and brownfields thus attracting private investment - the municipality has started the revitalization of industrial brownfields near Lielupe, among Garozas, Prohorova and Neretas streets, foreseeing investments in the amount of 12.5 million euros. As the performance indicators of industry, wholesale and retail sectors in Jelgava remain high, increasing freight transport flow, the importance of high-quality transit roads is a priority - in 2019, the reconstruction of the Platone Bridge in Miera Street was completed, as well as large-scale reconstruction works of the Loka Highway is still in progress, thus improving the existing transit and freight transport routes. Along with the improvement of the business environment, it is crucial to develop the potential of knowledge and innovation, to keep up with the requirements of the labor market and the needs of students. In 2019, we were the first in the country to implement educational reform by optimizing the network of municipal educational institutions and determining the specialization of each school to promote high quality education. In September 2019, the students of Jelgava State Gymnasium started the new school year in a fully modernized school. Also, the stadium of Jelgava Secondary School of Technology and the sports field near Jelgava 4th Primary School were reconstructed. We are proud of our award winning buildings in the “Construction Award of the Year 2019” and “Best Building of the Year in Latvia 2019” - 1st place in the nomination "Wooden Building" - open-air concert hall "Mītava" on Pasta (Post) Island and nomination “Restoration"- renovated wooden building at Vecpilsētas Street 14, Jelgava. The city is developing and requires more and more intellectual resources – young students hungry for knowledge and willing to learn, entrepreneurs, smart and provident. Change is the driving force of development and is the key to Jelgava's success - to be able to foresee one step ahead of events, to undertake initiative and responsibility. I invite you to get acquainted with the development of the city in the latest edition of "Jelgava in numbers" for new discoveries and opportunities! Andris Rāviņš Chairman of Jelgava City Council About Jelgava Jelgava is fourth largest city in Latvia by population and fifth by the territory. The total area is 60,3 km2 of which: - 2,72 km2 are covered by water - 1,62 km2 are covered by parks - 12,64 km2 are covered by forests Distance: Jelgava - Riga 42 km Jelgava - Vilnius 295 km Jelgava - Tallinn 350 km Jelgava - Moscow 1053 km Jelgava - Stockholm 482 km Jelgava - Berlin 1221 km Jelgava - Vienna 1403 km Jelgava Large Coat of Arms As approved by the National Heraldry Committee on the 24th of November, 2016, the Large Coat of Arms of Jelgava depicts two silver lions with heads looking backwards, red tongues and golden crowns, holding shield with Coat of Arms of Jelgava, standing on the silver base. Coat of Arms Jelgava is the only city in Latvia that contains the country`s small coat of arms within its coat of arms. The city received the coat of arms at the same time as it received city rights, in 1573. Thefirst coat of arms depicted a crowned stag head on a raspberry red field; the current coat of arms contains an elk head on a crimson field. Flag The City flag was approved on October 28, 1938. It is devided in two similar parts: dark blue on top and red on bottom. In the center of the flag Jelgava Coat of Arms is placed. 3 About Jelgava In 2012 Jelgava City logo was approved. The logo is made up of a contour of an elk head and the word “Jelgava”. The large antlers symbolize the rich historical experience and value of the city. Jelgava is the only city in Latvia, whose coat of arms also heraldically depicts the small coat of arms of the country, which makes the official symbolism of Jelgava heavy and its use solemn. For everyday use, a lighter and more attractive city logo has been created, which stylizes the elk's head and the name of the city. The large and branched horns of the Jelgava logo elk symbolize the historical value and experience of the city. On March 20th 2012 Jelgava city logo and motto were registered in the Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia as the trademark. The greatest value of the city of Jelgava is the people who live, study and work here - for their personal and city growth. Therefore, everyone here has the opportunity to find an area in which he wants to work, gain knowledge and skills, develop professionally and express himself creatively. These are growth opportunities from preschool to seniors. We, inhabitants of Jelgava, are growing together with our city, by giving it our special and invaluable contribution. The joint work of inhabitants is the foundation for a better future and beautiful today. People of Jelgava have achieved stable growth and welfare of the city. 4 City Budget Structure for the implementation of revenues of the general budget of Jelgava city municipality in 2019, euro un % Loans; 18 457 891; 15,71% Finances; 8 463 Income tax; 43 898; 7,20% 522 219; 37,04% Budget department income; 1 867 149; 1,59% Transferts of Local-governance budget; 917 477; 0,78% Real estate tax; 3 899 274; 3,32% Transferts of Gambling tax; 452 Goverment Non-tax revenue; 179; 0,38% budget; 39 370 558 971; 0,48% 284; 33,50% Source: Jelgava City municipality information Structure for the implementation of the general budget expenditure of Jelgava City municipality in 2019, euro un % Local gov.territory Healthcare; Recreation, culture and real estate 340 720; 0,3% and religion; 7 909 management; 442; 7,6% 4 124 432; 4,0% Education; 44 271 531; 42,5% Environment protection; 2 672 652; 2,6% Economic activity; 23 838 772; 22,9% Public order and security; 3 523 917; 3,4% Governance Social affairs; departments; Equity investment; Interest on a loan; 4 385 488; 4,2% 6 570 079; 6,3% 5 312 240; 5,1% 1 271 178; 1,2% Source: Jelgava City municipality information 5 Inhabitants City population of long-term residents of Jelgava at the beginning of the year 80 000 73 45573 71 39971 67 02667 65 51165 64 71664 64 16564 64 08464 63 98563 70 000 95863 63 74363 63 68463 63 35763 63 21963 62 82262 62 40462 60 92360 59 64059 58 28058 57 77357 57 33257 57 18057 57 05357 56 74356 56 38356 56 06256 60 000 97255 50 000 70045 40 000 13135 30 000 21 47921 20 000 10 13010 9 948 9 10 000 0 2020 1857 1914 1992 1996 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1795 Source:Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Ethnic makeup at the beginning of 2020, % Poles Germans Estonians Gypsies 1,7% 0,1% 0,7% 0,1% Others Ukrainians 2,0% 2,4% Rusians 25,1% Latvians 61,5% Belarussians 5,0% Lithuanians 1,4% Source:Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 6 Inhabitants Jelgava population, gender structure 2011 - 2020, % 100 90 80 70 60 54,2 54,4 54,5 54,4 54,4 54,5 54,4 54,5 54,6 54,5 50 45,8 45,6 45,5 45,6 45,6 45,5 45,6 45,5 45,4 45,5 40 30 20 10 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Women Men Source:Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Jelgava population gender/ age structure on Jan 1, 2020 2214 12 762 3084 11 1516 3418 10 2099 9 4642 4009 8 4221 4020 4521 7 4828 2603 6 2483 1643 5 1638 4 995 928 1761 3 1617 2 1374 1447 2141 1 2275 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Women Men Source: Jelgava City municipality information 7 Inhabitants Jelgava city population shown in under working age, in working age and retired proportion, 2011 - 2020,% 80 70 65,1 64,4 63,6 62,7 61,8 61,1 61,7 61,0 60,7 60,2 60 50 40 30 20,9 19,9 20,5 20,9 21,2 21,5 21,7 20,6 21,1 21,3 17,2 17,7 18,1 18,2 18,4 20 15 15,1 15,5 16,1 16,7 10 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Under working age Working age Retired Source:Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Dependency ratio1 in Jelgava and Latvia at the beginning of the year Dependency ratio Year Jelgava Latvia 2011 536 558 2012 553 572 2013 571 583 2014 596 598 2015 619 613 2016 637 625 2017 621 608 2018 638 621 2019 648 632 2020 660 643 Source:Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1 The total demographic dependency ratio is the ratio of the combined youth population and senior population to the working-age population.
Recommended publications
  • Intrazonal Agricultural Resources in Kurzeme Peninsula
    ECONOMICS INTRAZONAL AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES IN KURZEME PENINSULA Linda Siliòa Latvia University of Agriculture e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The paper focuses on the exposition of the research results on agricultural resources in Kurzeme peninsula–climatic resources, qualitative evaluation of the land, condition of land amelioration, topographic resources, and structural breakdown of farm land by types of use. It is concluded that extremely various climatic and soil conditions govern in the region. The Southeast part of Kurzeme peninsula is displayed very favourably by the aggregate value of agricultural resources. Labour productivity in Kurzeme has been analysed as well. Key words: agriculture, factor, peninsula, resources. Introduction ferent and even extremely different. These aspects have Encyclopaedical publication ‘Pasaules zemes un stimulated more profound or profound complex research tautas’ (Lands and Peoples of the World, 1978) defines on each intrazone or micro-region, or sub-district of natu- Kurzeme peninsula as the Northwest part of Latvia lying ral conditions. between the Baltic Sea in the West and the Riga Gulf in the K. Brîvkalns (1959), a researcher of soil and natural East. conditions, has displayed five sub-districts or intrazones of Latvian geographers (Latvijas ìeogrâfija, 1975) char- natural conditions (soils) in Kurzeme: acterise Kurzeme peninsula and its intrazonal differences • coastal sandy lowland (1a) stretching along the from climatic (Temòikova, 1958), relief, soil, and other as- coasts of the Baltic Sea and the Riga Gulf and covers pects essential for agriculture (Brîvkalns et al., 1968). the Northern part of the region; The total length of the sea and gulf borderline is twice • Western Kurzeme plain and hill land (2a) – parts of longer than its land borderline, where it verges on Dobele Liepâja and Kuldîga districts; and Riga districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarosław Charchuła a Report of the International Scientific Conference "Educational Paths of Poles Abroad", Ciechocinek, April 27-28, 2017
    Jarosław Charchuła A Report of the International Scientific Conference "Educational Paths of Poles Abroad", Ciechocinek, April 27-28, 2017 Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana. Rocznik Wydziału Pedagogicznego Akademii "Ignatianum" w Krakowie 20/4, 129-135 2017 jarosław charchuła Sj jesuit university ignatianum in krakow, poland A report of the international Scientific conference “Educational Paths of Poles Abroad”, Ciechocinek, April 27–28, 2017 On 27–28 April 2017 in Ciechocinek, an International Scientific Conference was held, entitled “Educational Paths of Poles Abroad”. It was organised by the Department of Educational Sociology and Social Education of the Faculty of Education of the Nicolaus Coper- nicus University in Toruń, and co-organised by: the Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, the University in Bialystok, the Department of Ethnology and Education Studies in Cieszyn of the University of Silesia in Katowice, the Marie Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin; the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University (Ukraine), and the Association for Support of Intercultural Education. The meeting was under the patronage of: the Marshal of the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship, the Mayor of the City of Toruń, His Magnificence, the Rector of the Nicolaus Copernicus Univer- sity in Toruń, the Education Sciences Committee, and the Polish Educational Research Association. The Scientific Committee was chaired by Prof. dr hab. Jerzy Nikitorowicz, the Program Commit- tee by Dr hab. Maria Marta Urlińska, Professor at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, and the Organisational Commit- tee by Dr hab. Jarosław Horowski. Secretaries of the conference were: Dr Tomasz Różański, Dr Jarosław Przeperski, Dr Monika Błendowska, Dr Jolanta Suchodolska. The conference was devoted to the problems of Poles living SPI Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saeima (Parliament) Election
    /pub/public/30067.html Legislation / The Saeima Election Law Unofficial translation Modified by amendments adopted till 14 July 2014 As in force on 19 July 2014 The Saeima has adopted and the President of State has proclaimed the following law: The Saeima Election Law Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Citizens of Latvia who have reached the age of 18 by election day have the right to vote. (As amended by the 6 February 2014 Law) 2.(Deleted by the 6 February 2014 Law). 3. A person has the right to vote in any constituency. 4. Any citizen of Latvia who has reached the age of 21 before election day may be elected to the Saeima unless one or more of the restrictions specified in Article 5 of this Law apply. 5. Persons are not to be included in the lists of candidates and are not eligible to be elected to the Saeima if they: 1) have been placed under statutory trusteeship by the court; 2) are serving a court sentence in a penitentiary; 3) have been convicted of an intentionally committed criminal offence except in cases when persons have been rehabilitated or their conviction has been expunged or vacated; 4) have committed a criminal offence set forth in the Criminal Law in a state of mental incapacity or a state of diminished mental capacity or who, after committing a criminal offence, have developed a mental disorder and thus are incapable of taking or controlling a conscious action and as a result have been subjected to compulsory medical measures, or whose cases have been dismissed without applying such compulsory medical measures; 5) belong
    [Show full text]
  • JSC “Latvian State Roads”
    JSC “Latvian State Roads” Annual Report 2004 JSC “Latvian State Roads” Annual Report 2004 2 Contents State Joint Stock Company “Latvian State Roads” Today . 4 Structure of State Joint Stock Company “Latvian State Roads” . 7 Personnel . 10 Road Laboratory . 14 Latvian Road Museum . 15 International Co-operation . 17 Resolution of Auditor . 19 Balance . 20 Tax and Social Security Payments . 22 Review on Changes in Equities . 23 Calculation of Reserve Fund for Time Period from January 1 to October 25, 2004 (turnover cost method) . 24 Profit/Loss Calculation for the Period from October 25 to December 31, 2004 (categorised in columns according to period cost method) . 25 Latvian Road Network . 26 Latvian Road Map . 27 Latvian State Roads by District . 28 Latvian State Main Roads by District . 29 Latvian State 1st Class Roads by District . 30 Latvian State 2nd Class Roads by District . 31 3 Annual Report 2004 JSC “Latvian State Roads” Bridges on Latvian State Roads . 32 Location of Bridges on Latvian State Roads . .33 Average Annual Daily Traffic Intensity . 34 Vehicles Registered in Latvia . 36 Road Network Development . 37 Environmental Protection . 40 Road Routine Maintenance . 42 Expenditures for State Road Routine Maintenance in 2004 . 45 Executed Routine Maintenance Works on State Roads in 2004 by District and City . 48 Winter Road Maintenance . 51 Maintenance of State Main and 1st Class Roads in the Winter of 2004/2005 . 52 Road and Bridge Periodic Maintenance and Reconstruction . 53 Road Traffic Organisation . 61 State Road Financing . 66 Financing of Cohesion Fund Projects in the Road Sector . 68 Financing for Investment Project “Improvements in VIA BALTICA Route and West–East Corridor” .
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Cross Border Business Support Libraries Network Strategy (ID No BNA 2012/072/ERAF)
    Latvia-Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 Project „Establishment of business support library cross border network” LLIV-253 Joint Cross Border Business Support Libraries Network Strategy (ID No BNA 2012/072/ERAF) Organisation responsible for this material: SAFEGE BALTIJA Ltd. Riga, 30 September 2013 This material has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this material are the sole responsibility of the Bauska, Rundale, Pakruojis, Pasvalys and Biržai municipalities and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. 1 Content EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 6 KOPSAVILKUMS ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 SANTRAUKA .................................................................................................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................13 1.1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • A Social Assessment of Poverty in Latvia
    LISTENING TO THE POOR: A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA Report on research findings (March – June 1998) Institute of Philosophy and Sociology Riga, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS TALKING TO THE POOR:............................................................................................................ I A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA .............................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... VII OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................ VII METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. VII FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER 1: OBJECTIVES AND METHODS............................................................................1 AN ECONOMY IN TRANSITION................................................................................................1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................2 METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Between the Number of Visitors at Tourist Accommodation Establishments and the Economic Development in Latvia
    Economics and Rural Development Vol. 8, No. 1, 2012 ISSN 1822-3346 INTERACTION BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF VISITORS AT TOURIST ACCOMMODATION ESTABLISHMENTS AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN LATVIA Aina Muska1, Ligita Bite2 Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia The research hypothesis: the economic development of a district affects the number of visitors at tourist accommodation establishments outside Riga region. The research aim is to identify a correlation between the number of visitors at tourist accommodation establishments and the economic development of a district in Latvia. The research was done using data broken down by statistical region and districts (a unit of administrative division of the territory of Latvia until the middle of 2009). The research showed that the majority (more than 60%) of visitors at Latvian tourist accommodation establishments were foreign tourists whose share at Riga tourist accommodation establishments accounted for more than 70%. Outside Riga region, more than 70% of visitors were local (Latvian) tourists, mostly business tourists. In the research period, more than half of visitors at tourist accommodation establishments concentrated in Riga region, while more than 10% – in Pieriga and Kurzeme regions. The share of visitors in the other regions did not exceed 6% of their total number. According to a cluster analysis, an explicit trend of monocentric economic development is specific to Latvia, resulting in significant differences between Riga, the capital city of Latvia, and the other districts of Latvia. The number of visitors at tourist accommodation establishments is higher in the clusters having a high (Riga) and medium (districts of Riga, Liepaja, Ventspils, and Daugavpils) level of economic development than in the clusters with a lower level of economic development (districts of Aluksne, Balvi, Dobele, Gulbene, Kraslava, Ludza, Preili, and Valka).
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 2-X WP6 D6.3 Site-Assessment
    Project: BiG>East (EIE/07/214) Assessment Studies for Specific Biogas Sites in Latvia Deliverable D 6.3 Submitted by: M.Sc.ing. Ilze Dzene EKODOMA Ltd. Noliktavas street 3-3, Riga LV-1010, Latvia 07 April 2009 With the support of: The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not represent the opinion of the Community. The Euro- pean Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. 1 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Results within Step 1: Selection of the Region......................................................................... 4 Description of the selected regions for potential Biogas Sites................................................. 4 Biogas Site 1: Ėekava parish ............................................................................................... 4 Biogas Site 2: Sesava parish................................................................................................. 6 Biogas Site 3: Zaube parish.................................................................................................. 8 Biomass supply ...................................................................................................................... 10 Biogas Site 1: Ėekava parish ............................................................................................. 10 Biogas Site 2: Sesava parish..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Euromosaic III Touches Upon Vital Interests of Individuals and Their Living Conditions
    Research Centre on Multilingualism at the KU Brussel E U R O M O S A I C III Presence of Regional and Minority Language Groups in the New Member States * * * * * C O N T E N T S Preface INTRODUCTION 1. Methodology 1.1 Data sources 5 1.2 Structure 5 1.3 Inclusion of languages 6 1.4 Working languages and translation 7 2. Regional or Minority Languages in the New Member States 2.1 Linguistic overview 8 2.2 Statistic and language use 9 2.3 Historical and geographical aspects 11 2.4 Statehood and beyond 12 INDIVIDUAL REPORTS Cyprus Country profile and languages 16 Bibliography 28 The Czech Republic Country profile 30 German 37 Polish 44 Romani 51 Slovak 59 Other languages 65 Bibliography 73 Estonia Country profile 79 Russian 88 Other languages 99 Bibliography 108 Hungary Country profile 111 Croatian 127 German 132 Romani 138 Romanian 143 Serbian 148 Slovak 152 Slovenian 156 Other languages 160 Bibliography 164 i Latvia Country profile 167 Belorussian 176 Polish 180 Russian 184 Ukrainian 189 Other languages 193 Bibliography 198 Lithuania Country profile 200 Polish 207 Russian 212 Other languages 217 Bibliography 225 Malta Country profile and linguistic situation 227 Poland Country profile 237 Belorussian 244 German 248 Kashubian 255 Lithuanian 261 Ruthenian/Lemkish 264 Ukrainian 268 Other languages 273 Bibliography 277 Slovakia Country profile 278 German 285 Hungarian 290 Romani 298 Other languages 305 Bibliography 313 Slovenia Country profile 316 Hungarian 323 Italian 328 Romani 334 Other languages 337 Bibliography 339 ii PREFACE i The European Union has been called the “modern Babel”, a statement that bears witness to the multitude of languages and cultures whose number has remarkably increased after the enlargement of the Union in May of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Report Submitted by Latvia Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
    Strasbourg, 6 December 2016 ACFC/SR/III(2016)001 Third Report submitted by Latvia pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Received on 6 December 2016) Third Report on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by the Republic of Latvia Rīga, 2016 2 List of Abbreviations ANCAL Association of National Cultural Associations of Latvia ACNM Advisory Council on National Minorities CL Criminal Law EEA European Economic Area EMM electronic mass media LJTC Latvian Judicial Training Centre LLA Latvian Language Agency MC Ministry of Culture MES Ministry of Education and Science MoI Ministry of the Interior NEMMC National Electronic Mass Media Council NGO non-governmental organisation OCMA Office for Citizenship and Migration Affairs PHARE financial instrument of the European Union for financial and technical co- operation with Central and Eastern European countries SIF Society Integration Fund SLC State Language Centre USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 3 Introduction Procedure for drafting and adoption of the Report 1. On 26 May 2005, the Parliament of Latvia (the Saeima) ratified the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (hereinafter – the Convention), and it entered into force on 1 October 2005. The Second State Report on the implementation of the Convention (hereinafter – the Second Report) was submitted on 3 September 2012. The second cycle of monitoring the implementation of the Convention
    [Show full text]
  • CONTINUITY in CHANGE? Latvia’S Local Governments After Regional Reform and Local Government Elections a REFORM to TACKLE REGIONAL DISPARITIES
    PERSPECTIVE DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS Despite a substantial recent re- gional reform which was vigor- ously opposed by local leaders, the local government elections held in June 2021 did not alter CONTINUITY the balance of power in Latvia. As a political project, the re- form may have achieved its IN CHANGE? goal to implement effi ciency gains, yet the phenomenon of “strongmen” mayors continues Latvia’s Local Governments after Regional Reform to persist. and Local Government Elections A record-low voter turnout Daunis Auers and a general discontent with Riga, June 2021 parties and government per- formance may be an indication that a chance to fi nd a widely accepted and long-term re- gional reform solution was missed. DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS CONTINUITY IN CHANGE? Latvia’s Local Governments after Regional Reform and Local Government Elections A REFORM TO TACKLE REGIONAL DISPARITIES Latvia’s eighth regular local government elections since the the ages of 41 and 60 years although just 31 candidates were renewal of independence in 1991 were held on Saturday under 20 years of age, refl ecting the dire demographic trends 5 June 2021. Both citizens of Latvia and other European Un- affl icting Latvia’s regions over the last three decades. ion Member States resident in Latvia and registered in a mu- nicipality 90 days before the election were eligible to vote. In a sense, these elections were far more “local” than those While turnout fell dramatically from 50.4% in the previous in previous years. An early municipal election was held in 2017 vote to just 34% in 2021, those who did bother to vote Latvia’s capital city Rīga in August 2020 after a series of cor- tended to support political continuity, particularly in Latvia’s ruption scandals had engulfed the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Latvian Government on the Visit to Latvia Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
    CPT/Inf (2013) 20 Report to the Latvian Government on the visit to Latvia carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 5 to 15 September 2011 The Latvian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its responses. The Government’s responses are set out in document CPT/Inf (2013) 21. Strasbourg, 27 August 2013 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................8 E. Monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty........................................................................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Police establishments ................................................................................................................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]