Development of Environmental Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Elaborate and update of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment report of the Shipyard "Bijela” contaminated soil and blasting grit waste Reference No.#: MNE-IWMCP-8428-CQ-CS-16-1.3.6.2 Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard July 2016 A project implemented by AMBIENTE S.C. (Italy) in Joint Venture with DBA Progetti S.p.A. (Italy), MEDIX Ltd. (Montenegro) and Smart Environmental Solutions (SES) (Montenegro) Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard Document Control Sheet Client: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Project: Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Elaborate and update of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment report of the Shipyard "Bijela” contaminated soil and blasting grit waste Reference No.#: MNE-IWMCP-8428-CQ-CS-16-1.3.6.2 Title of the Report: Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard –25 July 2016 Contractor: AMBIENTE S.C. DBA Progetti S.p.A. Via Frassina, 21 – 5 MEDIX Ltd. 4033 Carrara (MS) - Italy Smart Environmental Solutions (SES) Prepared by Quality Check by Approved by Mr. Franco ROCCHI Project Manager (EPA) Team Leader Ms. Sara TONLORENZI and Ms. Inés Sanchez Ms. Cristina LAZARO Quality Control Expert and Project Manager Supporting Environmental Signature Mr. Nicola BERTOLINI Team Contract Manager Date 25th July 2016 25th July 2016 Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Elaborate and update of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment report of the Shipyard "Bijela” contaminated soil and blasting grit waste 2 REFERENCE NO.#: MNE-IWMCP-8428-CQ-CS-16-1.3.6.2 LOAN NO. 8428-0 ME Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard Table of contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Policy, legal, and administrative framework .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Montenegrin regulations .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Directives and regulations of the European Union in the field of waste management .................................... 9 2.3 World Bank Policies and Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 11 3 Project description .................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Remediation of Shipyard Bijela Contaminated site ......................................................................................... 14 4 Baseline data - current situation of the Environment .............................................................................................. 19 4.1 Description of the site and surroundings ........................................................................................................ 19 4.2 Flora, fauna and natural resources ................................................................................................................. 19 4.3 Cultural assets ................................................................................................................................................. 19 4.4 Climate ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 4.5 Previous investigations.................................................................................................................................... 19 4.5.1. Additional investigation by CDM .................................................................................................................... 20 4.5.2. Additional investigations by CETI, considered by Tauw & Witteveen+Bos .................................................... 22 4.5.3. "Zero" state investigation by CETI .................................................................................................................. 22 4.6 Potential risk and design parameter ............................................................................................................... 23 4.7 General characterization of the waste body ................................................................................................... 23 4.8 Social Economic baseline ................................................................................................................................ 23 4.8.1. General information ....................................................................................................................................... 23 4.8.2. Potential for employment .............................................................................................................................. 24 5 Environmental impacts ............................................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 Impact assessment of the current situation and possible mitigation measures ............................................. 25 6 Analysis of alternatives ............................................................................................................................................. 28 7 Environmental management plan (EMP).................................................................................................................. 31 7.1 Environmental Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................................................... 32 7.2 Environmental Monitoring Plan ...................................................................................................................... 38 8 Appendixes ............................................................................................................................................................... 42 8.1 List of report preparers – the Joint Venture (Consultant) ............................................................................... 43 8.2 References – list of written materials and study visit report used in study preparation ................................ 44 8.2.1 Policy, legal, and administrative framework ............................................................................................... 44 8.2.2 Plans, programs, studies and projects ........................................................................................................ 45 8.2.3 Consultant’s Site visit on 1st July 2016 ....................................................................................................... 46 8.3 Public consultation – Minutes ......................................................................................................................... 48 Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Elaborate and update of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment report of the Shipyard "Bijela” contaminated soil and blasting grit waste 3 REFERENCE NO.#: MNE-IWMCP-8428-CQ-CS-16-1.3.6.2 LOAN NO. 8428-0 ME Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard List of Abbreviations European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of ADR Dangerous Goods by Road CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CETI Center for Eco-Toxicological Research Podgorica I.l.c. EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment EU European Union IWMCP Industrial Waste Management and Clean-up Project JV Joint Venture LNAPL Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MCDA Multi Criteria Decision Analysis SES Smart Environmental Solutions TBT Tributyltin ToR Terms of References WB World Bank Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Elaborate and update of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment report of the Shipyard "Bijela” contaminated soil and blasting grit waste 4 REFERENCE NO.#: MNE-IWMCP-8428-CQ-CS-16-1.3.6.2 LOAN NO. 8428-0 ME Updated ESIA and EMP for Bijela Shipyard 1 Executive Summary The Government of Montenegro has obtained a loan (Loan No. IBRD 8428) from The World Bank for the ‘Industrial Waste Management and Clean-up Project’ to remediate five selected industrial waste disposal sites and to manage the ongoing disposal of industrial hazardous waste. The development objective of the IWMCP is to reduce contamination of Montenegro’s natural resources and public health risks of exposure to this contamination from selected industrial waste disposal sites. The IWMCP will achieve its objective through: 1. The development and implementation of a remediation investment program for selected legacy industrial waste disposal sites, and 2. Related to these interventions, supporting institutions and related industries in bringing the management of industrial hazardous waste in compliance with Montenegrin legislation. The Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism of Montenegro and Environmental Protection Agency of Montenegro (EPA), in June 2012, published Environmental and Social Impact Assessment study (ESIA) for remediation of 5 locations for waste disposal, that were selected for remediation within IWMCP, with one of them being waste blasting
Recommended publications
  • Cape Mimoza Tourist Complex About Atlas Group
    Cape Mimoza Tourist complex About Atlas Group Atlas Group has over 30 members operating in the area of banking,​​ financial services, insurance, real estate, production, tourism, media, education, culture and sport. Our companies have offices in Montenegro, Serbia, Cyprus and Russia Atlas Group is organised as a modern management unit with a main objective to increase the value of all member companies by improving performance, investing in new projects and creating of synergy between the member companies. Atlas Group operates in line with global trends promoting sustainable development and utilization of renewable energy sources. Philanthropic activities conducted through the Atlas Group Foundation, which is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative. Atlas Bank was awarded the status of the best Bank in Montenegro, and Atlas Group as best financial group for 2009. by world economy magazine "World finance’’. In order to promote its mission Atlas Group has hosted many famous personalities from the spheres of politics, business, show business and arts. About Montenegro Located in Southeast Europe in the heart of Mediterranean. Extreme natural beauty and cultural – historical heritage (4 national parks, Old town Kotor under UNESCO protection). Area: 13.812 km2; population: 620.000; climate: continental, mediterranean and mountain; Capital city Podgorica with around 200.000 inhabitants. Borders with Croatia, BIH, Serbia, Albania and South part faces Adriatic Sea. Traffic connection: airports Podgorica, Tivat in Montenegro and airport in Dubrovnik, Croatia, port of Bar and Porto Montenegro, good connection of roads with international traffic. Currency: EUR Achieved political and economic stability – in the process of joining: EU, WTO and NATO Economy is largely oriented towards real estate and tourism development– stimulative investment climate (income tax 9%, VAT 17%, customs rate 6,6%, tax on real estate transaction 3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Citizens in Herceg Novi Municipality in 1811
    UDC: 314.7.044(497.16)”1807/1814” Историјски записи, година XC, 3-4/2017 Marija CRNIć PEJOVIć* FOREIGN CITIZENS IN HERCEG NOVI MUNICIPALITY IN 1811 ABSTRACT: At the time of the French rule in the Bay of Kotor (1807- 1814), records were kept on the foreigners residing on its territory. During this period, the civil authorities were subordinated to the military authori- ties who adopted orders on recording foreigners. The persons who did not register a foreigner immediately and offer him lodging before receiving an approval from the military authorities were subjected to a fine and military laws. On the basis of the list of foreigners from 1811, we find out that there were twenty-eight of them together with their family members residing in the Herceg Novi municipality. The majority came from Trebinje, and then from the east Adriatic coast. They arrived at the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century. KEY wORDS: French administration, Trebinje, Podi, Mokrine, pro- fessions, age According to the Treaty of Tilsit (25 May 1807), the Bay of Kotor came under French control and their troops entered Herceg Novi on 29 July and remained there almost seven years – until 27 May 1814.1 At the time of the French rule, the territory of the Herceg Novi munic- ipality covered a smaller area than in the previous period, because the French administration established the Bijela municipality, for which it was not de- termined which area it encompassed, whether it was only Bijela or the sur- rounding villages as well (and which ones if so).2 * Autorka je viša arhivistkinja u penziji.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Template
    Acta hydrotechnica 25/43 (2012), Ljubljana Open Access Journal ISSN 1581-0267 Odprtodostopna revija UDK/UDC: 579:628.144(497.16) Prejeto/Received: 13. 09. 2012 Kratki znanstveni prispevek– Short scientific paper Sprejeto/Accepted: 19. 11. 2013 APPLICATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF WATER QUALITY IN SPECIFIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS UPORABA KAZALCEV USPEŠNOSTI ZA KAKOVOST VODE V SPECIFIČNIH SISTEMIH OSKRBE Z VODO Olivera Doklestić 1,∗ 1 Ekoboka projekt d.o.o, Herceg Novi, Montenegro Abstract This paper deals with the management in the area of water quality in systems characterized by uneven seasonal water production and consumption. We present a model for managing water supply systems in terms of monitoring water quality, while introducing performance indicators (abbreviated PI) containing variables directly or indirectly related to water quality. In the discussion section, we explain each individual group of indicators and give reasons for their use. We present results of setting an IP matrix related to the issue of improving water quality in the system. The main aim is to establishing a methodology to improve efficiency, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a water system with a seasonal customer boom when resources and the total quantity of water in the system are at a minimum, by applying IPs. Keywords: performance indicators, microbiological quality of water, chlorination, water cuts, Montenegro. Izvleček Študija se ukvarja z upravljanjem na področju kakovosti vode pri sistemih s sezonsko neenakomerno proizvodnjo in porabo vode. Predstavljamo model upravljanja vodovodnega sistema s pomočjo monitoringa kakovosti, z uporabo kazalcev uspešnosti (KU), ki vsebujejo spremenljivke, ki se posredno ali neposredno nanašajo na kakovost vode.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions
    1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects Of
    Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects of European Transformation in the Countries Targeted by EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policies Montenegro Jelena Džankiü Jadranka Kaluÿeroviü, Ivana Vojinoviü, Ana Krsmanoviü, Milica Dakoviü, Gordana Radojeviü, Ivan Jovetiü, Vojin Goluboviü, Mirza Muleškoviü, Milika Mirkoviü, ISSP – Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognosis Bosiljka Vukoviü June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION PROCESS IN MONTENEGRO ............. 4 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 5 1.2 The Creation of Democratic Institutions and Their Functioning ............................. 7 1.2.1 Political institutions in Montenegro throughout history: the effect of political traditions on the development of democratic institutions................................................ 7 1.2.2 The constitutional establishment of Montenegro .......................................... 12 1.2.3 Observations ................................................................................................ 26 1.3 The Implementation of the EU’s Democratic Requirements................................. 27 1.3.1 Transparency ............................................................................................... 27 1.3.2 Decision-making processes .......................................................................... 29 1.3.3 Minority rights............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAP of INVESTMENTS.Pdf
    Contents: About the city.................................................... 6 Porto Bono....................................................... 8 Montrose.......................................................... 10 One&Only resort Porto Novi............................ 12 Cape Mimosa.................................................... 14 Luxury resort Mrkovi........................................ 16 Marine resort Rupe.......................................... 18 Hotel resort Lazaret......................................... 20 Hotel complex Žager......................................... 22 Zirine gardens & Podi vistas............................ 24 Hotel F.C. Igalo................................................. 26 Ski centre Orjen................................................ 28 Business centre Igalo....................................... 30 Atrium mall...................................................... 32 Organic food centre Kameno........................... 34 City harbour...................................................... 36 Football town Sutorina..................................... 38 City garage &square......................................... 40 Underwater tunnel Herceg Novi—Luštica....... 42 Underground escalator..................................... 44 Traffic corridor.................................................. 46 Fortresses......................................................... 48 Herceg Novi The city you have yearned for Herceg Novi is a city in the south-west of Montenegro, located at a strategic and attractive
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Law on Courts of Montenegro
    Strasbourg, 20 October 2014 CDL-REF(2014)043 Engl.Only Opinion no. 790 / 2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT LAW ON COURTS OF MONTENEGRO This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int 2 CDL-REF(2014)043 DRAFT LAW ON COURTS I BASIC PROVISIONS Scope Article 1 The present Law shall regulate establishment, organisation, and jurisdiction of courts; organisation of work of courts and judicial administration, and other matters of importance for orderly and timely functioning of courts. Judicial Power Article 2 Judicial power shall be exercised by courts established under the present Law. Courts shall decide on legal matters under their jurisdiction in a lawful, objective, and timely manner. Judicial office shall be exercised by judges and lay judges. Accessibility of Courts and Equality of Arms Article 3 Everyone shall have the right to address a court for the purpose of exercising his/her rights. Everyone shall be equal before a court. Publicity Article 4 The work of courts shall be public. Public nature of the work of courts shall be ensured in accordance with law. Impartiality Article 5 Everyone shall have the right to an impartial trial within a reasonable time and to have their legal matter, notwithstanding the parties and the characteristics of the legal matter, heard by a judge to whom the case was allocated randomly. Resources for Work of Courts Article 6 The resources and conditions for work of courts shall be ensured in the budget of Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • 176 Vedecká Štúdia Scientific Study
    Children department IN Herceg NOVI Detské oddelenie V HERCEGU Novom Photo Foto: Stevan Kordić, 2010 176 VEDECKÁ šTÚDIA SCIENTIFIC STUDY Context in the Works of Nikola Dobrović on the Territory of Herceg Novi Kontext v dielach Nikolu Dobrovića pre lokalitu Herceg Novi Veljko Radulović, Sanja Paunović Žarić V podmienkach súčasných globalizačných trendov, vzniku k regionálnemu kontextu. Toto zameranie sprostredkúva nový nového európskeho politického a teritoriálneho kontextu pohľad a kritické prehodnotenie celkovej práce architekta, ktorá a formulovania kultúrnych regionálnych rozdielov vznikla je referenčným bodom v diskusii o modernej architektúre 20. potreba vytvoriť novú definíciu vlastnej kultúrnej a mestskej storočia v skúmanom regióne. Nedávnejšie výskumy sa pritom identity. Mimoriadne sa prejavila v prostrediach špecifických pozoruhodnou tvorbou tohto autora v Hercegu Novom zaoberali svojimi geoklimatickými podmienkami, kultúrnym a historic- len veľmi okrajovo. Príspevok zároveň prináša aj porovnanie kým dedičstvom, ako je pobrežie Jadranského mora. Osobitne sa s jeho skoršou tvorbou, vyznačujúcou sa podobnou citlivosťou kládol dôraz na zátoku Boka Kotorska a na Herceg Novi, ako na pre daný kontext, ktorú preukázali už jeho projekty pre Dubrov- jej najväčšie a pritom najmladšie mesto. Herceg Novi pozostáva ník. z mestských aglomerácií rozmiestnených pozdĺž dynamickej Dobrovićov urbanistický plán bol prvým dokumentom topografie terénu v úzkej pobrežnej zóne. systematického mestského plánovania v histórii rozvoja mesta, Prehodnotenie a analýza rázu architektúry nedávnej minu- vytvorený na základe organizovanej a kontrolovanej komuni- losti môže v procese redefinície už existujúcej mestskej identity, kácie s miestnou komunitou a administratívnym vedením. Je či budovania novej, poskytnúť odpovede a cenné usmernenia. prvým priekopníckym krokom smerom k definovaniu nového Je preto mimoriadne dôležité opätovne sa zaoberať referenč- modelu plánovaného rozvoja mesta Herceg Novi a zátoky Boka nými dielami a autormi druhej polovice 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Scientific Study Vedecká Štúdia Josip Broz Tito on The
    JOSIP BROZ TITO ON THE VIEWING TERRACE OF THE VILLA GALEB, POSING FOR A SCULPTOR. THE PANORAMA OF HERCEG NOVI CAN BE SEEN IN THE BACKGROUND JOSIP BROZ TITO NA VYHLIADKOVEJ TERASE VILY GALEB PÓZUJE SOCHÁROVI. V POZADÍ VIDNO PANORÁMU MESTA HERCEG NOVI Source Zdroj: Archives of the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Igalo 60 SCIENTIFIC STUDY VEDECKÁ ŠTÚDIA Tito’s Villas in Herceg Novi – Regional Contexts and State Residences Titove vily v meste Herceg Novi – regionálne kontexty a štátne rezidencie Veljko Radulović, Sanja Paunović Žarić, Ema Alihodžić Jašarović https://doi.org/10.31577/archandurb.2021.55.1-2.5 Tento príspevok sa zameriava na súčasnú architektúru zálivu nemocnice v Meljine, na svahoch vrchu Savina, vo východnej Kotorská boka, oblasti Svetového dedičstva UNESCO, prihlia- časti samosprávy v blízkosti centra mesta Herceg Novi. Budova, dajúc na trendy rastu miest v špecifickom regionálnom kon- ktorá mala vyjadrovať oddanosť armády najvyššiemu veliteľovi, texte. Najmladším a najväčším mestom je Herceg Novi, ležiaci dostala názov Lovćenka podľa čiernohorského pohoria, ktoré pri vstupe do zálivu. Dynamický kultúrno-historický kontext má zásadný symbolický význam a čestné miesto na štátnom s atraktívnym pobrežím a vnútrozemím podmieňuje výstavbu znaku Čiernej Hory. Architektonika vily je špecifická, s jasnou architektonických objektov, ktoré nemožno redukovať len na asociáciou na architektúru Blízkeho východu, vizuálne členená súbor formálnych vzťahov s lokalitou. prvkom lomeného oblúka, ktorý sa opakuje na všetkých štyroch Hlavným predmetom výskumu tohto príspevku je architek- stranách centrálneho kubického objektu. Stavba samotná nevy- tonický diskurz posledných desaťročí 20. storočia, ako aj archi- tvára rozpoznateľné vzťahy ani s prvkami prírodného prostredia, tektonická perspektíva.
    [Show full text]
  • The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro Impressum
    The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro Impressum Project coordinators: Marina MarkoviÉ, MSc, PAP/RAC. Aleš Mlakar, PhD, PNAM, Ivana StojanoviÉ, Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism Habitats: Milena BatakoviÉ, Mihailo JoviÏeviÉ Fish – pelagic: Milica MandiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology, Ana PešiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Fish – demersal: Mirko ÒuroviÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Eutrophication and Ana MišuroviÉ, MSc contamination: Marine litter: Milica MandiÉ, PhD, Institute of Marine Biology Landscapes: Aleš Mlakar, PhD, PNAM, Nika Cigoj Sitar, PNAM Data and images: Mihailo JoviÏeviÉ; Nika Cigoj Sitar, PNAM Translator: Assia BariÉ Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphic design: Ljudomat Cover photo: Montenegrin coast © Slaven Vilus The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UNEP/MAP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The report was prepared as part of the GEF Adriatic project, funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). For citation: UNEP/MAP-PAP/RAC i MEPU (2021). The State and Pressures of the Marine Environment in Montenegro. Authors (alphabetically): BatakoviÉ Milena, Cigoj Sitar Nika, ÒuroviÉ Mirko, JoviÏeviÉ Mihailo, MandiÉ Milica, MarkoviÉ Marina, MišuroviÉ Ana, Mlakar Aleš, PešiÉ Ana, StojanoviÉ Ivana. Ur: PAP/RAC – GEF Adriatic project. pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Plan Montenegro Eng Final
    Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO UNTIL 2020 Podgorica, March 2008 1 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Title of the document: Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ordering party: Ministry of Economic Development (Contract No. 01/367/2/02, 9 th December 2007) Contractor: “Montenegroinženjering”, Podgorica Technical support: GTZ German Technical Cooperation Elaboration: ‘Montenegroinženjering’, Podgorica, Ratimir Mugoša, CEO Institute for Architecture and Urbanism of Serbia, Belgrade, Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., CEO Institute for Urbanism of Slovenia, Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, Ph.D., CEO Core Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Ratimir Mugoša, Architect, Coordinator of the elaboration and main planner Ivan Stani č, udia Miodrag Vujoševi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Predrag Bulaji ć, Graduate Engineer in Electrotechnics Svetislav Popovi ć, MA in Architecture Vasilije Radulovi ć, Graduate Engineer in Geology Extended Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Vasilije ðurovi ć, Architect Spatial organization and development Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, PhD, udia Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., Architect Ksenija Vukmanovi ć, Architect Dragana Čeni ć, Architect Vasilije Radulovi ć, Geology Engineer Natural Spatial Characteristics Maja Ba ćovi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Demography Vasilije Buškovi ć, MA in Biology Qualities of environment and protection of nature 2 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ljubiša Kuzovi ć, Traffic Engineer Traffic- economy activity Drašenko Glavni ć, Traffic Engineer Simeun
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    AUGUST 2012/REVISED JANUARY 2013 MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Environmental and Public Disclosure Authorized Social Impact Assessment of Remediation of Five Contaminated Sites WORLD BANK ESIA AND SAFEGUARD STUDIES FOR CONTAMINATED INDUSTRIAL SITES REMEDIATION Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ADDRESS COWI A/S Parallelvej 2 2800 Kongens Lyngby Denmark TEL +45 56 40 00 00 FAX +45 56 40 99 99 WWW cowi.com AUGUST 2012/REVISED JANUARY 2013 MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Remediation of Five Contaminated Sites WORLD BANK ESIA AND SAFEGUARD STUDIES FOR CONTAMINATED INDUSTRIAL SITES REMEDIATION PROJECT NO. A22211-001 DOCUMENT NO. C VERSION 9 DATE OF ISSUE 8 August 2012/revised January 2013 PREPARED LBCH CHECKED BOC APPROVED LBCH Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Five Contaminated Sites 3 CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary and Non-Technical Description 5 2 Objective of the Project and the ESIA Study 18 3 Legislation and guidelines 21 4 Description of the Project 25 5 Gradac remediation project 27 5.1 Remediation Project for Gradac Contaminated Site 29 5.2 Environmental Baseline 31 5.3 Social-Economic baseline 35 5.4 Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plans 36 5.5 Alternatives 42 6 Nikšić Remediation Project 44 6.1 Remediation of Nikšić Contaminated Site 46 6.2 Environmental Baseline 47 6.3 Social-Economic baseline 50 6.4 Environmental
    [Show full text]