Dynamic China British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies Annual Conference 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamic China British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies Annual Conference 2016 Dynamic China British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies Annual Conference 2016 23-24 June 2016 Strand Campus, King’s College London Organisers: Partners: FOREWORD Dear participants, We are pleased to welcome you to ‘Dynamic China: British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies Annual Conference 2016’, which aims to gather postgraduate researchers with a particular interest and research focus in Chinese Studies. You will find enclosed in this brochure some important information regarding the conference, including: (1) General information about organisers, conference venues, and social events; (2) A full agenda of the conference; (3) Biographies of our invited speakers and abstracts of panel presentations; (4) A list of participants, including affiliation. If you have any additional queries during and after the conference, please feel free to get in touch with our organising team ([email protected]), who will be more than happy to assist you. We hope that this conference will give you all an inspiring and rewarding experience. Organising Team 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On behalf of the British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies, I would like to thank the generosity of King’s College London, our sponsor, for granting financial support to this international conference. I would also like to thank the Lau China Institute, and especially Dr. Konstantinos Tsimonis, who secured funding from the Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, and PhD students Agatha Kratz, Linxi Li and Chunsen Yu for their help in organizing the conference. Let me extend our gratitude to Mr. Shi Lei, the First Secretary of Education Section, who will be joining our conference on behalf of the Embassy of China in the United Kingdom, and to our partners: the British Association for Chinese Studies, the China Daily, the Chinese Weekly, Combined Academic Publishers, Cypress Books, Mother’s Bridge of Love, the Society for Anglo-Chinese Understanding, and the Young China Watchers, who have all contributed to this conference in their own way. Finally, I would like to thank our keynote speakers Prof. Kerry Brown (King’s College London), Prof. Barend ter Haar (University of Oxford) and Prof. Julia C. Strauss (SOAS, University of London) for sharing their research and knowledge during this conference, as well as all of you for your participation and valuable insights on China, from a broad range of academic disciplines. Gabriel F. Y. Tsang President, British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies 2 DIRECTIONS TO AND FROM KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The conference will take place at the Strand Building, Strand Campus of King’s College London: King’s College London Strand Campus Strand London WC2R 2LS Tel: +44 (0)20 7836 5454 There are a number of ways to travel to King’s College London’s Strand Campus, including: Underground Temple (District and Circle lines): 2 minute walk. Charing Cross (Bakerloo and Northern lines): 10 minute walk, Embankment (District, Circle and Bakerloo lines): 10 minute walk, Waterloo (Jubilee, Northern, Bakerloo, Waterloo & City lines): 12 minute walk, Holborn (Central and Picadilly lines): 12 minute walk, or Chancery Lane (Central line): use exit 4 - 15 minute walk. Train Charing Cross: 9 minute walk. Waterloo: 12 minute walk. Waterloo East: 10 minute walk. Blackfriars: 12 minute walk. Bus Buses stopping outside the university: 1, 4, 26, 59, 68, 76, X68, 168, 171, 172, 176 (24 hour), 188, 243 (24 hour), 341 (24 hour), 521, RV1. Car Note that there is no public parking at King’s College London, but a pay and display parking system operates in nearby streets including Surrey Street. 3 Conference venues: A (King’s Building): Anatomy Museum B (Strand Building): Lucas Theatre, S-1.04, S-1.06, S-1.08, S3.40 4 WIFI King’s College London provides access to Eduroam. It allows users at any participating organisation to log on to the wireless network using the same username and password that they would use at their home organisation. (You may use the email address of your home institution as the username.) Eduroam technical support is provided by your home organisation. Therefore, you must ensure that you are able to connect to eduroam at your home organisation before travelling. King's College London is unable to provide technical support to visitors. SOCIAL EVENT (UNOFFICIAL) Plan A (good weather): A City Walk (guided by local students; visiting Trafalgar Square, Buckingham Palace, Big Ben, Westminster Abbey, etc.) A light picnic (at St. Jame’s Park) Plan B (in case of rain): A City Walk with umbrellas A Drink at a café Time: 2:00pm-6:00pm, 25th June, 2016 Meet at the reception of the Strand Campus, King’s College London Free of charge, but you have to pay for any food and drink you bring or order. 5 WELCOME TO KING’S COLLEGE LONDON King’s College London, one of England’s oldest universities and a founding college of the University of London, was established by King George IV and the Duke of Wellington in 1829. King’s College London has a long and established tradition and history of excellence, both in terms of teaching and research, being the third higher education institution in England after Oxford and Cambridge to receive a royal charter to award degrees. Today, King’s is ranked 16th in the world and 5th in the UK and is a five star university according to the QS World University Ranking. 25,000 students currently study at King’s College London, spread across five campuses. About 9,000 of them are international students from over 150 countries. King’s College London’s objective, up until today, is to provide them with a modern education and an inspiring environment, and to help them reach a fulfilling future and make their mark in today’s world. ABOUT THE LAU CHINA INSTITUTE The Lau China Institute at King’s College London is part of a network of Global Institutes dedicated to understanding twenty- first century political, economic and cultural powers in a global context. The Institute focuses on interdisciplinary research into contemporary China and its impact on world affairs. It coordinates and develops China-related research capabilities and China-focused programmes of study, while also building links with Chinese organizations in education, the cultural and creative sectors, business and government. Together with the Brazil, India, North America and Russia Institutes and the International Development Institute at King’s, the Lau China Institute aims to promote understanding, provide a hub of excellence and build connections through study, staff and student exchanges, research and knowledge sharing. 6 ABOUT THE BRITISH POSTGRADUATE NETWORK FOR CHINESE STUDIES The British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies (BPCS), previously the China Postgraduate Network (CPN), is an academic network for the growing number of postgraduates, young scholars and early-career researchers in Chinese Studies at British universities. We hope that the BPCS will become your primary source of information on developments in the area of Chinese Studies in the UK, as well as allow you to connect with others working in your field. Membership of the British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies is free and open to everyone. To join, simply go to our official website (http://bacsuk.org.uk/bpcs) and subscribe via ‘BPCS mailing list’. Our mailing list includes news on China-related events, funding opportunities, training and jobs. In an effort to create more space for interaction between BPCS members and keep you updated to our events and other academic activities, we set up a LinkedIn group and a facebook page which you are most welcome to join. ABOUT THIS CONFERENCE Under the leadership of Xi Jinping, China have entered a new phase. Widely referred to as the era of realising the ‘Chinese dream’ and building the ‘new normal’, it is commonly characterised by notions of ‘slow growth’, ‘anti-corruption’, ‘middle income status’, and ‘urbanisation’. At the same time, Xi’s push to rehabilitate Chinese culture and traditional Confucian values prompted both the Chinese society and China scholars to rethink China’s ideological, cultural and historical heritage. But what are exactly the changes in politics, economy, culture and society that have taken place under Xi Jinping, and what can be expected in the future? With the 13th five-year plan underway, China is faced with revaluation of its past, complexity of its present, and uncertainty of its future. Now is the time to revisit old questions and develop new lines of academic inquiry. What is the future of China in a changing world? What is the true nature of power in China? How far has popular culture in China been influenced by the proliferation of new media? What impact has China’s popular and literary culture had in the non-Chinese speaking world? Is China’s pre-modern history still relevant today? What is the relationship between urbanisation and a consumption-led economic model? What can China’s foreign relations tell us about its global future? These are some of the questions that ‘Dynamic China: British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies 2016 Annual Conference’ explores. 7 Conference Schedule 23/06/2016 (Thursday) - Day 1 9:00 – 9:30 Registration (at the Lucas Theatre [S-2.18], Strand Building) 9:30 – 9:55 Conference Opening – Welcome speeches by the British Postgraduate Network for Chinese Studies (at the Lucas Theatre) 09:55 – 10:55 Keynote Speech 1: Prof. Kerry Brown (King’s College London)– ‘Reading the Political Modern Oracle Bones: Chinese Power Under Xi Jinping’ (at the Lucas Theatre) 10:55 – 11:00 Group Photo 11:00 – 12:30 Panel Session 1 International Relations 1 (at S-1.04) Chair: Dr Konstantinos Tsimonis Culture and Technology 1 (at S-1.06) Chair: Dr Vivienne X. Guo Public Policy 1 (S-1.08) Chair: Agatha Kratz 12:30 – 1:30 Lunch (at the Anatomy Museum, 6th floor, King’s Building) 1:30 – 2:30 Keynote Speech 2: Prof.
Recommended publications
  • China Media Bulletin
    Issue No. 119: May 2017 CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN Headlines FEATURE | Preparing for China’s next internet crackdown P1 BROADCAST / NEW MEDIA | In lawyers crackdown, authorities punish online speech, foreign media contacts P4 NEW MEDIA | New rules tighten control over online news P5 NEW MEDIA | Netizen conversations: Student death, anticorruption show, Great Firewall game P6 HONG KONG | Pressure on dissent increases amid press freedom decline P7 BEYOND CHINA | Confucius Institutes, Netflix market entry, China’s global media influence P8 NEW! FEATURED PRISONER | Zhang Haitao P10 WHAT TO WATCH FOR P10 NEW! TAKE ACTION P11 PHOTO OF THE MONTH A staged fight against corruption In the Name of the People, a new anticorruption drama on Hunan TV that was funded by the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, debuted on March 28. Cartoonist Rebel Pepper offers a skeptical take on the popular series, depicting it as a puppet show controlled by President Xi Jinping. Xi has overseen selective, politically fraught corruption probes against high-level officials, or “tigers.” The cartoonist writes, “If Xi Jinping hadn’t given his per- sonal approval, how could this show receive such high-profile publicity?” On April 20, the British group Index on Censorship announced that Rebel Pepper had received its 2017 Freedom of Expression Arts Fellow award. Credit: China Digital Times Visit http://freedomhou.se/cmb_signup or email [email protected] to subscribe or submit items. CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN: MAY 2017 FEATURE Preparing for China’s next internet crackdown By Sarah Cook China’s new Cybersecurity Law takes effect on June 1. Together with regulations issued Senior Research over the past month by the Cyber Administration of China (CAC)—including on news Analyst for East reporting and commentary—the new legal landscape threatens to tighten what is al- Asia at Freedom ready one of the world’s most restrictive online environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Uyghur Experiences of Detention in Post-2015 Xinjiang 1
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................9 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................10 MAIN FINDINGS Surveillance and arrests in the XUAR ................................................................................13 Surveillance .......................................................................................................................13 Arrests ...............................................................................................................................15 Detention in the XUAR ........................................................................................................18 The detention environment in the XUAR ............................................................................18 Pre-trial detention facilities versus re-education camps ......................................................20 Treatment in detention facilities ..........................................................................................22 Detention as a site of political indoctrination and cultural cleansing....................................25 Violence in detention facilities ............................................................................................26 Possibilities for information
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China
    FORBIDDEN FEEDS Government Controls on Social Media in China 1 FORBIDDEN FEEDS Government Controls on Social Media in China March 13, 2018 © 2018 PEN America. All rights reserved. PEN America stands at the intersection of literature and hu- man rights to protect open expression in the United States and worldwide. We champion the freedom to write, recognizing the power of the word to transform the world. Our mission is to unite writers and their allies to celebrate creative expression and defend the liberties that make it possible. Founded in 1922, PEN America is the largest of more than 100 centers of PEN International. Our strength is in our membership—a nationwide community of more than 7,000 novelists, journalists, poets, es- sayists, playwrights, editors, publishers, translators, agents, and other writing professionals. For more information, visit pen.org. Cover Illustration: Badiucao CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION : AN UNFULFILLED PROMISE 7 OUTLINE AND METHODOLOGY 10 KEY FINDINGS 11 SECTION I : AN OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP 12 The Prevalence of Social Media Usage in China 12 Digital Rights—Including the Right to Free Expression—Under International Law 14 China’s Control of Online Expression: A Historical Perspective 15 State Control over Social Media: Policy 17 State Control over Social Media: Recent Laws and Regulations 18 SECTION II: SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN PRACTICE 24 A Typology of Censored Topics 24 The Corporate Responsibility to Censor its Users 29 The Mechanics of Censorship 32 Tibet and
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Cartoon in Transition: Animal Symbolism and Allegory from the “Modern Magazine” to the “Online Carnival”
    Studies in Visual Arts and Communication: an international journal Vol 4, No 1 (2017) on-line ISSN 2393 - 1221 Chinese Cartoon in transition: animal symbolism and allegory from the “modern magazine” to the “online carnival” Martina Caschera* Abstract By definition, the cartoon (satirical, single-panelled vignette) “reduces complex situations to simple images, treating a theme with a touch of immediacy. A cartoon can mask a forceful intent behind an innocuous facade; hence it is an ideal art of deception” (Hung, 1994:124). As well as their western counterparts, Chinese cartoonists have always based much of their art on the strong socio-political potential of the format, establishing a mutual dependence of pictographic material and press journalism. From a media perspective, the present paper shows how Chinese cartoon developed from 1920s-1930s society ̶ when the “modern magazine” was the most important reference and medium for this newly-born visual language – to the present. Cyberspace has recently become the chosen space for Chinese cartoonists’ visual satire to take part in an international public discourse and in the “online carnival” (Herold and Marolt, 2011:11-15), therefore replacing magazines and printed press. Through emblematic exempla and following the main narrative of “animal symbolism and allegory”, this paper intends to connect the historical background with cartoonists’ critical efficiency, communicative tools and peculiar aesthetics, aiming at answering to questions such as: how Chinese modern cartoon changed, from the first exempla conveyed in “modern magazines” to the latest online expressions? Is its original power of irreverence still alive and how did it survive? How modern cartoonists (Lu Shaofei, Liao Bingxiong) and contemporary cartoonists (Rebel Pepper, Crazy Crab, Ba Diucao) have been dealing with governmental intervention and censorship? Keywords: Visual Culture, Popular Culture, cartoon, satire, censorship, cyberspace Introduction of a top-down indoctrination3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping's
    Promoting human rights & empowering grassroots activism in China A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream” 2013 Annual Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in China March 2014 Web: www.chrdnet.com • Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 1 Crackdown on Liberties That Are Fundamental to Civil Society 4 Judicial Authorities Lend a Hand in Reining in Online Speech & Media 7 Bold Reprisals & Violence Against Human Rights Lawyers 10 Reprisals Against Activists Seeking Participation 12 in UN Human Rights Reviews New Leaders Follow Old Patterns 14 Recommendations 15 Notes 17 Index of Chinese Human Rights Defenders Whose Cases CHRD 25 Reported or Documented in 2013 Cover: Chinese citizens inspired by the “New Citizens’ Movement” () took to the streets in 2013 to rally for anti-corruption measures, calling on top government officials to disclose their personal wealth. “2013 saw the harshest suppression of civil society in over a decade…with human rights and rule of law basically going backwards. Still, the drive in Chinese civil society to keep fighting under difficult and dangerous conditions is the most important asset for promoting human rights and democratization in the country.” - Teng Biao, Chinese human rights lawyer Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 Human rights defenders in China experienced a tumultuous year of government suppression, yet they continued to demonstrate remarkable strength and extraordinary courage.1 In interviews and discussions conducted by Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), dozens of Chinese activists describe 2013 as the worst year for human rights since at least 2008, which saw severe crackdowns on civil liberties around the Beijing Olympics and with the Charter 08 campaign for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • China Media Bulletin
    Issue No. 132: January 2019 CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN Headlines ANALYSIS Five Predictions for Chinese Information Controls in the Year of the Pig P2 IN THE NEWS • Authorities unveil new rules and enforcement efforts to bolster online censorship P5 • Low-tech repression used to control modern communications P6 • Beijing’s fierce defense of Huawei fuels doubts about company’s autonomyP7 • Hong Kong: Concerns of Chinese surveillance, intimidation of academics and journalists increase P9 • Beyond China: New Zealand newspaper, academic freedom, Thailand arrest, tech in Africa P9 FEATURED PUSHBACK Google’s Dragonfly suspended P11 WHAT TO WATCH FOR IN 2019 P12 TAKE ACTION P13 IMAGE OF THE MONTH Chairpig Xi Exiled artist Rebel Pepper posted this cartoon, featuring a caricature of Chinese president Xi Jinping reading the character gan (meaning “do”), to Twitter on December 31. The tweet’s title, a play on words, reads “Chairman Pig Xi’s New Year’s Speech.” Xi used the word gan, which can also mean “work hard,” numerous times in his actu- al speech. Rebel Pepper has 338,000 followers on Twitter, and his posts often circulate widely among Chinese-language users of the platform, which is banned in China and can only be reached with circumven- tion tools. At least one Twitter user in China was recently questioned by police after posting a Rebel Pepper cartoon to his own account. Credit: Rebel Pepper Visit http://freedomhou.se/cmb_signup or email [email protected] to subscribe or submit items. CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN: JANUARY 2019 ANALYSIS Five Predictions for Chinese Information Controls in the Year of the Pig By Sarah Cook The signs point to escalating efforts, Senior Research with diminishing returns for the regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Introduction
    × × × negative × × × Knowing What Not to Know in Contemporary China × × × exposures × × × exposures Margaret Hillenbrand Negative Exposures × sinotheory A Series Edited by Carlos Rojas × and Eileen Cheng- yin Chow × Knowing What Not to Know in Con temporary China × × × Duke University Press Durham and London ​2020 × × × Negative × × × Knowing What Not to Know in Con temporary China × × × Exposures × × × Margaret Hillenbrand × × × © 2020 duke university press. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Courtney Leigh Baker Typeset in Warnock Pro by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Hillenbrand, Margaret, [date] author. Title: Negative exposures : knowing what not to know in contemporary China / Margaret Hillenbrand. Other titles: Sinotheory. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2020. | Series: Sinotheory | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2019047922 (print) lccn 2019047923 (ebook) isbn 9781478006190 (hardcover) isbn 9781478008002 (paperback) isbn 9781478009047 (ebook) Subjects: lcsh: Photography—Political aspects—China—History— 20th century. | Altered prints—Political aspects—China. | Photography, Handworked—Political aspects—China. | Official secrets—Social aspects—China. | Propaganda, Chinese. | Collective memory—Political aspects—China. | Nanking Massacre, Nanjing, Jiangsu Sheng, China, 1937. | China—History—Cultural Revolution, 1966–1976. | China— History—Tiananmen Square Incident, 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • PEN America Case Studies Appendix for "Forbidden Feeds"
    PEN America Case Studies Appendix for "Forbidden Feeds" Name Date first Occupation/Role Summary Online Official charges/reason for Sentence/Punishment Sources detained/ platform detention (or sentenced interrogation) Wang 1/4/12 Unknown Wang Luanying receives an email Tianya N/A “China Human Rights Briefing January 4-9, Luanying warning after posting on Tianya 2012”, Chinese Human Rights Defenders, about a beating she suffered Jan. 10, 2012, https://www.nchrd. while at a China Mobile office. In org/2012/01/china-human-rights-briefing- her post, Wang describes the lack january-4-9-2012/. of action by local authorities. The email, which comes from the official email address of the mayor of Jiachuan City, warns her that she can not use public opinion to exert pressure on authorities and claims her appeal for assistance is "not realistic." N/A Hu Jia 1/11/12 AIDS and pro- Hu Jia's home is raided by the Twitter Unknown Interrogation Peter Simpson, "Chinese police raid home of democracy activist police after calling for family human rights activist Hu Jia", The visitation rights for the jailed Telegraph, Jan. 12, 2012, http://www. human rights lawyer Gao telegraph.co. Zhisheng on Twitter. His uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/9009763/Chi computers are confiscated and he nese-police-raid-home-of-human-rights- is taken away for interrogation. activist-Hu-Jia.html. Li Delin 3/19/12 Senior Editor at Li Delin is detained after noting Sina Weibo Unknown 7-day detention. "The anatomy of a coup rumour", The Capital Week on Weibo the presence of a high Economist, April 5, 2012, https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report .Pdf
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 5, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE 2017 ANNUAL REPORT VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 5, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–811 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Senate House MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma Cochairman TOM COTTON, Arkansas ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina STEVE DAINES, Montana TRENT FRANKS, Arizona TODD YOUNG, Indiana RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota GARY PETERS, Michigan TED LIEU, California ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed ELYSE B.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoblocking and Global Video Culture
    EDITED BY RAMON LOBATO & JAMES MEESE GEOBLOCKING AND GLOBAL VIDEO CULTURE A SERIES OF READERS PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE OF NETWORK CULTURES ISSUE NO.: 18 EDITED BY RAMON LOBATO & JAMES MEESE GEOBLOCKING AND GLOBAL VIDEO CULTURE 4 THEORY ON DEMAND Theory on Demand #18 Geoblocking and Global Video Culture Editors: Ramon Lobato and James Meese Copy-editing: Leonieke van Dipten Editorial support: Miriam Rasch Cover Design: Katja van Stiphout DTP: Leonieke van Dipten EPUB development: Leonieke van Dipten Infographics: Sandra Hanchard Printer: Print on Demand Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, 2016 ISBN: 978-94-92302-03-8 Contact Institute of Network Cultures Phone: +3120 5951865 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.networkcultures.org This publication is available through various print on demand services. For more infor- mation, and a freely downloadable PDF: http://networkcultures.org/publications This publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDe- rivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). GEOBLOCKING AND GLOBAL VIDEO CULTURE 5 6 THEORY ON DEMAND CONTENTS Preface and acknowledgements 9 Introduction: The New Video Geography 10 Ramon Lobato PART I: PERSPECTIVES ON GEOBLOCKING 25 Tunneling Media: Geoblocking and Online Border Resistance 32 Juan Llamas-Rodriguez The Logics and Territorialities of Geoblocking 42 Cameran Ashraf and Luis Felipe Alvarez León Geoblocking, Technical Standards and the Law 54 Marketa Trimble Periscope, Live-Streaming and Mobile Video Culture 64 Adam
    [Show full text]
  • ADDRESSING DISINFORMATION: INSIGHTS and BEST PRACTICES the U.S
    ADDRESSING DISINFORMATION: INSIGHTS AND BEST PRACTICES The U.S. Agency for Global Media is an independent federal agency overseeing public service media networks that provide unbiased news and information in countries where the press is restricted. Our mission is to inform, engage and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. This report created by: Yelena Osipova-Stocker and Nick Shchetko Office of Policy and Research Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank current and former professionals from USAGM and its networks for their great advice, thoughtful insights and other invaluable contributions to the report, with special thanks going to: Bahaa Al-Hajjar, Niusha Boghrati, Nart Bouran, Chetra Chap, Andrey Cherkasov, Jela DeFranceschi, Venera Djumataeva, Clara Dominguez, Inna Dubinsky, Kokab Farshori, Christine Fetzko, Rim Gilfanov, Awais Haider, Betsy Henderson, Vuthy Khin Huot, Taras Ilkiv, Bruce Jacobs, Thomas Kent, Rostyslav Khotin, Zac Kidwell, Deirdre Kline, Andrew Kornbluth, Kaarmanbek Kuluev, Ivan Lopez, Harun Maruf, Ia Meurmishvili, Alen Mlatisuma, Kate Neeper, Barry Newhouse, Diane Nininahazwe, Shawn Powers, Carol Prahl, Alim Seytoff, Anna Shamanska, Andrey Shary, Alisher Sidikov, Tsion Tadesse, Jeffrey Trimble, Tolkun Umaraliev and Tseten Wangchuk. U.S. Agency for Global Media | Addressing Disinformation | 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................ 2 Introduction ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hacking, Debating, and Renewing Democracy in Taiwan in the Age of “Post-Truth” Communication
    Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 17, No. 1: 21-43 Hacking, Debating, and Renewing Democracy in Taiwan in the Age of “Post-Truth” Communication Stephen J. Hartnett and Chiaoning Su Abstract Across the world, cyber actors are destabilizing democracies by flooding public spheres with disinformation. While a preponderance of studies has focused on how the Russians interfered in the U.S. 2016 presidential election, this essay addresses two cyber-disinformation campaigns against Taiwan. The first case study is the 2016 “sticker war,” wherein Chinese netizens bombarded Tsai Ing-wen’s Facebook page following her election as Taiwan’s president. Addressing the “sticker war” opens questions about the nuances of user-led cyber activism in and between China and Taiwan. The essay then tackles the more expansive 2018–2020 cyber-disinformation campaign launched by the Communist Party of China (CPC) against democracy in Taiwan, focusing on the case of Su Chii-cherng, wherein the CPC sought to sow confusion and chaos into the democratic process. Both cases confirm the fears of scholars tracking the evolution of a new “post-truth” communication paradigm. Citizens have risen to the defense of democracy, however, so the essay closes on a hopeful note, arguing the hacking of democracy via cyber-disinformation operations has led to healthy debates about communication norms, and hence a renewal of democratic practices in Taiwan. Keywords: Democracy, social media, sticker war, Su Chii-cherng, Tsai Ing-wen. In India, Hindus attacked Muslims after reading misleading Facebook and WhatsApp posts alleging Muslims had committed blasphemy against Hindu icons.1 In Hong Kong, while the streets surged with prodemocracy marchers, “more than 200,000 Twitter accounts” controlled by the Communist Party Stephen J.
    [Show full text]