Kuhlia Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kuhlia Species The University of Chicago Evolution of Diadromy in Fish: Insights from a Tropical Genus ( Kuhlia Species). Author(s): Pierre Feutry, Magalie Castelin, Jennifer R. Ovenden, Agnès Dettaï, Tony Robinet, Corinne Cruaud, and Philippe Keith Source: The American Naturalist, Vol. 181, No. 1 (January 2013), pp. 52-63 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The American Society of Naturalists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668593 . Accessed: 06/10/2015 23:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Naturalist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Tue, 6 Oct 2015 23:48:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions vol. 181, no. 1 the american naturalist january 2013 Evolution of Diadromy in Fish: Insights from a Tropical Genus (Kuhlia Species) Pierre Feutry,1,* Magalie Castelin,1 Jennifer R. Ovenden,2 Agne`s Dettaı¨,3 Tony Robinet,4 Corinne Cruaud,5 and Philippe Keith1 1. Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques, Unite´ de Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7208, Ichtyologie, 57 rue Cuvier, CP026, Paris 75231, France; 2. Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, Queensland Government, Ritchie Building, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4069, Australia; 3. Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, Syste´matique et Evolution, UMR 7138, Service de Syste´matique Mole´culaire, 57 rue Cuvier, CP026, Paris 75231, France; 4. Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques, UMR 7208, Station de Biologie Marine de Concarneau, Place de la Croix, 29100 Concarneau, France; 5. Genoscope, Centre National de Se´quenc¸age, 2 rue Gaston Cre´mieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry Cedex, France Submitted December 12, 2011; Accepted July 26, 2012; Electronically published November 27, 2012 Online enhancement: appendixes. the sea (Myers 1949). Diadromy takes three distinct forms: abstract: Diadromous species undergo regular migration between catadromy, anadromy, and amphidromy. Catadromous fresh and marine waters. This behavior is found in many species, including fish, mollusks, and crustaceans, some of which are com- and anadromous fish migrate between the marine and the mercially valuable species. Several attempts to trace the evolution of freshwater biomes to reproduce. Catadromous fish move this behavior have been made in Salmonidae and Galaxiidae, but from freshwater to breed in the sea, whereas anadromous ambiguous phylogenies and multiple character state changes pre- fish move from the sea to breed in freshwater habitats. vented unequivocal conclusions. The Kuhliidae family consists of 12 Migrations of amphidromous fish are not for reproductive fish species that inhabit tropical islands in the Indo-Pacific region. purposes. As defined by McDowall (2007), amphidromous The species have marine, partially catadromous, or fully catadromous life histories (i.e., they migrate from rivers to the sea to reproduce). fish reproduce in freshwater, and larvae drift downstream The evolution of migratory behavior was traced on a well-resolved to feed at sea. After a variable amount of time, juveniles phylogeny. Catadromous Kuhlia species were basal, and partially ca- return to freshwater, where they undergo most of their tadromous and marine species formed derived monophyletic groups. somatic growth before maturing and spawning. We refer This is, to our knowledge, the first time that a clear origin and polarity to this life cycle as freshwater amphidromy to distinguish for the diadromous character has been demonstrated. We propose it from marine amphidromy, which refers to reproduction that the relative lack of resources in tropical, inshore, marine habitats at sea, followed by migration to freshwater after hatching and the ephemeral and isolated nature of freshwater environments of tropical islands, combined with phenotypic plasticity of migratory for a variable period, then a return to the sea for additional traits, play key roles in driving the evolution of diadromy in the growth and reproduction (Gross 1987). Kuhliidae and probably in other groups. This work is an important Despite the physiological challenges presented by this starting point to understand the role of diadromy in speciation and tactic, diadromy has evolved multiple times in aquatic taxa, adaptation in unstable habitats. including fish, mollusks, and crustaceans, which verifies its importance. However, evolutionary pathways leading Keywords: diadromy, evolution, phylogeny, ancestral character re- construction, habitat shift, catadromy, land locking. to a diadromous life cycle are unclear (McDowall 1997). Gross (1987) proposed an ecological and evolutionary model based on the principle that diadromy would evolve Introduction if the combination of reproductive success and survivor- ship of migrants would exceed that of individuals who do The term “diadromy” was introduced by Myers to describe not migrate. In his model, catadromy and anadromy, re- migrations of aquatic organisms between freshwater and spectively, are preceded by marine and freshwater am- phidromy and are intermediary evolutionary steps be- * Corresponding author. Present address: Research Institute for Environment tween exclusively marine and freshwater life cycles. and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, 0909 Northern Territory, Australia; e-mail: [email protected]. Additional analysis of global patterns in aquatic produc- Am. Nat. 2013. Vol. 181, pp. 52–63. ᭧ 2012 by The University of Chicago. tivity led to the conclusion that the presence and the di- 0003-0147/2013/18101-53512$15.00. All rights reserved. rection of diadromy can largely be explained by the relative DOI: 10.1086/668593 availability of food resources in freshwater and marine This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Tue, 6 Oct 2015 23:48:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Evolution of Diadromy in Kuhliidae 53 Table 1: Sample, geographical location, and species name of specimens used in this study Sample Sampling location Latitude Longitude Species identification Kmar 1 Guam 13Њ2639.5N 144Њ4737.4E Kuhlia marginata Kmar 2 New Caledonia 20Њ3128.31S 164Њ4632.56E K. marginata Kmar 3 Pentecost, VA 15Њ470.9S 168Њ 952.06E K. marginata Kmar 4 Malekula, VA 16Њ 527.79S 167Њ1030.71E K. marginata Kmar 5 Efate, VA 17Њ3715.32S 168Њ2954.42E K. marginata Kmar 6 Queensland, AU 16Њ2737.1S 145Њ2122.2E K. marginata Ksal 1 Samoa 13Њ5448.3S 171Њ445.8W Kuhlia salelea Ksal 2 Samoa 13Њ5448.3S 171Њ445.8W K. salelea Kmal 1 Moorea, FP 17Њ357.3S 149Њ5024.4W Kuhlia malo Kmal2 Raiatea, FP 16Њ5237.6S 151Њ2535.0W K. malo Krup 1 Mayotte, CO 12Њ4826.4S45Њ120.5E Kuhlia rupestris Krup 2 Re´union, MA 21Њ1832.2S55Њ2434.5E K. rupestris Krup 3 New Caledonia 20Њ3128.31S 164Њ4632.56E K. rupestris Krup 4 Fraser Island, AU 25Њ 740.6S 153Њ1740.4E K. rupestris Ksau 1 Madagascar 15Њ2660.0S47Њ400.0E Kuhlia sauvagii Ksau 2 Madagascar 15Њ 846.9S49Њ5729.4E K. sauvagii Kxen 1 Hawaii 20Њ5620.0N 156Њ2033.0W Kuhlia xenura Kxen 2 Hawaii 20Њ5620.0N 156Њ2033.0W K. xenura Kmun 1 New Caledonia 20Њ5614.7S 165Њ2241.4E Kuhlia munda Kmun 2 New Caledonia 20Њ5614.7S 165Њ2241.4E K. munda Kcau 1 Re´union, MA 21Њ1832.2S55Њ2434.5E Kuhlia caudavittata Kcau 2 Re´union, MA 21Њ1832.2S55Њ2434.5E K. caudavittata Ksan 1 Moorea, FP 17Њ3442.1S 149Њ5181.1W Kuhlia sandvicensis Ksan 2 Tubuai, FP 23Њ2229.6S 149Њ291.0W K. sandvicensis Knut 1 Easter Island 27Њ 716.3S 109Њ2159.1W Kuhlia nutabunda Knut 2 Easter Island 27Њ 716.3S 109Њ2159.1W K. nutabunda Kmug 1 Re´union, MA 21Њ1832.2S55Њ2434.5E Kuhlia mugil Kmug 2 Re´union, MA 21Њ1832.2S55Њ2434.5E K. mugil Kmug 3 Clipperton 10Њ175.4N 109Њ1258.5W K. mugil Kmug 4 Clipperton 10Њ175.4N 109Њ1258.5W K. mugil Kmug 5 New Caledonia 20Њ5550.6S 165Њ1927.6E K. mugil Kmug 6 New Caledonia 20Њ5550.6S 165Њ1927.6E K. mugil Kpet 1 Clipperton 10Њ175.4N 109Њ1258.5W Kuhlia petiti Kpet 2 Clipperton 10Њ175.4N 109Њ1258.5W K. petiti Kpet 3 Marquesas, FP 9Њ5737.50S 138Њ5028.6W K. petiti Note: AU p Australia; CO p Comoros; FP p French Polynesia; MA p Mascarene; VA p Vanuatu. habitats (Gross et al. 1988). At low latitudes, freshwater The starting point to validate Gross’s (1987) model for productivity often exceeds marine water productivity. the evolution of diadromy is to determine whether diad- Gross et al. (1988) argue that this difference promotes the romous species have freshwater, marine, or diadromous occasional excursion of marine fish into freshwater hab- ancestry. This will allow the polarity of the character (i.e., itats and initiates evolution toward a fully freshwater life migratory behavior) to be inferred, which is the key to cycle through intermediate stages of marine amphidromy understanding the evolutionary scenario. One way to ad- followed by catadromy. At high latitudes, the reverse ap- dress these issues is to focus on the phylogeny of terminal plies: ocean productivity is generally higher than fresh- taxa (e.g., within family or genus) to identify changes
Recommended publications
  • The Native Stream Fishes of Hawaii
    Summer 2014 American Currents 2 THE NATIVE STREAM FISHES OF HAWAII Konrad Schmidt St. Paul, MN [email protected] Several years ago at the University of Minnesota a poster The “uniqueness” of these species is due not only to the about Hawaii’s native freshwater fishes caught my eye. I high degree of endemism, but also includes their habitat, life was astonished to learn that for a tropical zone the indige- cycle, and evolutionary adaptations. Hawaii’s watersheds nous freshwater ichthyofauna (traditionally and collectively are typically short and small. The healthiest fish populations known as ‘o’opu) is incredibly rich in uniqueness, but very generally inhabit perennial streams located on the windward poor in species diversity, comprising only four gobies and (northeast) side of islands which are drenched with 100-300 one sleeper. Four of the five are endemic to Hawaii. How- inches of rainfall annually. Frequent and turbid flash floods, ever, recent research suggests the ‘o’opu nākea of Hawaii is called freshets, occur on a regular basis; between events, a distinct species from the Pacific River Goby, and is, there- however, stream visibility can exceed 30 feet. On the lee- fore, also endemic. In addition to these fishes, there are only ward, drier sides, populations do persist in some intermit- two native euryhaline species that venture from the ocean tent streams at higher elevations even though lower reaches into the lower and slower reaches of streams not far above may be dry for months or years. These dynamic streams are their mouths: Hawaiian Flagtail (Kuhlia sandvicensis) and continually and naturally in a state of recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability and Distribution of Low Flow in Anahola Stream, Kaua I
    Prepared in cooperation with the State of Hawaiÿi Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Availability and Distribution of Low Flow in Anahola Stream, Kauaÿi, Hawaiÿi Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5264 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Kalalea Mountains in northeast Kauaÿi, Hawaiÿi. Photographed by Chui Ling Cheng. Availability and Distribution of Low Flow in Anahola Stream, Kauaÿi, Hawaiÿi By Chui Ling Cheng and Reuben H. Wolff Prepared in cooperation with the State of Hawaiÿi Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5264 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Suggested citation: Cheng, C.L., and Wolff, R.H., 2012, Availability and distribution of low flow in Anahola Stream, Kauaÿi, Hawaiÿi: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5264, 32 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Behavioral Ecology, Life History, Genetics, and Morophology
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Aspects of the behavioral ecology, life history, genetics, and morophology of the Hawaiian kuhliid fishes Lori Keene Benson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Benson, Lori Keene, "Aspects of the behavioral ecology, life history, genetics, and morophology of the Hawaiian kuhliid fishes" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1890. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1890 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ASPECTS OF THE BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, LIFE HISTORY, GENETICS, AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE HAWAIIAN KUHLIID FISHES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Lori Keene Benson B.S., University of Tampa, 1995 December 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to first thank my major professor, Dr. Mike Fitzsimons, for being a wonderful adviser on matters both scientific and unscientific. He was supportive when I left Baton Rouge during my final year of graduate school to pursue a job opportunity. I feel that I couldn’t have successfully juggled all of these responsibilities without him. I am also especially grateful for all of the help I received from my fellow graduate students at LSU.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Used to Help Align the Study Specimens
    Biology of Hawaiian Streams and Estuaries Biology of Hawaiian Streams and Estuaries Proceedings of the Symposium on the Biology of Hawaiian Streams and Estuaries Hilo, Hawai‘i 26–27 April 2005 Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis & J. Michael Fitzsimons Bishop Museum Bulletin in Cultural and Environmental Studies 3 Bishop Museum Press Honolulu, 2007 Editorial committee for this volume Ron A. Englund Neal L. Evenhuis J. Michael Fitzsimons Glenn R. Higashi Mark G. McRae Robert T. Nishimoto Supported by a grant from the Sportfish Restoration Project of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Division of Aquatic Resources, Department of Land & Natural Resources, State of Hawaii. Available from: Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704 Division of Aquatic Resources Department of Land & Natural Resources 1151 Punchbowl Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813 Published by Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Copyright ©2007 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 10: 1-58178-053-2 ISBN 13: 978-1-58178-053-6 ISSN 1548-9620 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword — William S. Devick ................................................................................................... vii Introduction — J. Michael Fitzsimons & Robert T. Nishimoto ..................................................... 1 Hawaiian stream fishes: the role of amphidromy in history, ecology, and conservation biology — Robert M. McDowall ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation Efficiency of Prey in the Hawaiian Monk Seal, Monachus Schauinslandi Gwen D. Goodman-Lowe, James R. Carpenter
    Assimilation Efficiency of Prey in the Hawaiian Monk Seal, Monachus schauinslandi Gwen D. Goodman-Lowe, James R. Carpenter, and Shannon Atkinson Gwen D. Goodman-Lowe. Dept. of Zoology, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI 96744, (808) 236-7416, Fax (808) 236-7443, email: [email protected] James R. Carpenter. Department of Animal Sciences, 1800 East-West Road, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 Shannon Atkinson. Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI 96744 2 Assimilation Efficiency of Prey in the Hawaiian Monk Seal, Monachus schauinslandi Gwen D. Goodman-Lowe, James R. Carpenter, and Shannon Atkinson Abstract Assimilation efficiency, digestive efficiency, metabolizable energy, and nitrogen retention in three captive adult male Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi) were measured using the indigestible marker, chromic oxide for four experimental diets: a control diet of herring (Clupea harengus), and three test diets consisting of flagtail (Kuhlia sandvicensis), squid (Loligo sp.), and lobster (Panulirus marginatus), each of which was used in combination with the herring diet. The addition of all three test prey to herring decreased the digestibility of gross energy by a mean of 3.58 + 3.89%. Assimilation efficiency of gross energy for herring was 96.1 + 4.0%, for flagtail was 73.8 + 6.8%, and for squid was 94.1 + 5.7%, but could not be determined for lobster. Digestive efficiency and metabolizable energy of the diets examined were high (4602.2 + 247.1 kcal * d-1 and 4062.5 + 178.4 kcal * d-1, respectively) and were positively correlated with the amount of gross energy ingested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Enigmatic Jungle Perch - Recent Research Provides Some Answers
    SPC Fisheries Newsletter #40 January - March 1987 THE ENIGMATIC JUNGLE PERCH - RECENT RESEARCH PROVIDES SOME ANSWERS by A.D. Lewis Fisheries Division, Ministry of Primary Industries, Suva, Fiji and A.E. Hogan Department of Primary Industry, Queensland, Australia. INTRODUCTION Mountain trout, aholehole, sesele, sakelo, ika droka, mahore, umatari, jungle perch - all names given thoughout their wide Indo-Pacific range to small silvery fishes of the family Kuhliidae. Found in both marine and freshwater habitats, from east Africa to Hawaii, most of the six or so species have characteristic tail marking which give them their common name of flagtail perch. They are believed to be most closely related to the well known north American basses fCentrgrchidae). Although good food fish, most flagtails attain relatively small sizes (less than 300 gm) and arouse little interest where they occur, other than as a minor subsistence food item. The exception is the largest member of the family, the jungle perch, Kuhlia rupestris (Lacepede), which grows to 450 mm in total length and 3 kg in weight and has acquired, in Australia at least, the reputation as a "legendary angling species" (Merrick and Schmida, 1984), as well as a considerable mystique. A handsome silvery species, with black markings dorso-laterally and a dark blotch on each caudal lobe (Figure 1), it is also regarded as excellent eating. The typical jungle perch habitat (figure 2) is fast-flowing perennial coastal streams in rain forest areas. In Australia, for example, the species is apparently restricted to the north-eastern and central Queensland coast and is absent from the slow-flowing Gulf of Carpentaria and Northern Territory rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Collected During the 2017 Marinegeo Assessment of Kāne
    Journal of the Marine Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Biological Association of the ā ‘ ‘ ‘ United Kingdom assessment of K ne ohe Bay, O ahu, Hawai i 1 1 1,2 cambridge.org/mbi Lynne R. Parenti , Diane E. Pitassy , Zeehan Jaafar , Kirill Vinnikov3,4,5 , Niamh E. Redmond6 and Kathleen S. Cole1,3 1Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 159, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; 2Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Original Article Singapore 117543, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore; 3School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai‘iatMānoa, 2538 McCarthy Mall, Edmondson Hall 216, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; 4Laboratory of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Cite this article: Parenti LR, Pitassy DE, Jaafar Aquatic Organisms, Far Eastern Federal University, 8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok 690091, Russia; 5Laboratory of Z, Vinnikov K, Redmond NE, Cole KS (2020). 6 Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Genetics, National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Vladivostok 690041, Russia and National Museum of assessment of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Natural History, Smithsonian Institution DNA Barcode Network, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 183, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA the United Kingdom 100,607–637. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0025315420000417 Abstract Received: 6 January 2020 We report the results of a survey of the fishes of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, conducted in 2017 as Revised: 23 March 2020 part of the Smithsonian Institution MarineGEO Hawaii bioassessment. We recorded 109 spe- Accepted: 30 April 2020 cies in 43 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 79 Wednesday, No. 190 October 1, 2014 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for 21 Species and Proposed Threatened Status for 2 Species in Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; Proposed Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Sep 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCP2.SGM 01OCP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 59364 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 190 / Wednesday, October 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ES–2014–0038; Division of Policy and butterfly (Hypolimnas octocula Directives Management; U.S. Fish & mariannensis; NCN), the Mariana Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife Headquarters, MS: BPHC, 5275 wandering butterfly (Vagrans egistina; Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– NCN), the Rota blue damselfly (Ischnura 50 CFR Part 17 3803. luta; NCN), the fragile tree snail [Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2014–0038: We request that you send comments (Samoana fragilis; akaleha), the Guam 4500030113] only by the methods described above. tree snail (Partula radiolata; akaleha), We will post all comments on http:// the humped tree snail (Partula gibba; www.regulations.gov. This generally akaleha), and Langford’s tree snail RIN 1018–BA13 means that we will post any personal (Partula langfordi; akaleha)). Two plant species (Cycas micronesica (fadang) and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife information you provide us (see Public Tabernaemontana rotensis (NCN)) are and Plants; Proposed Endangered Comments below for more information). proposed for listing as threatened Status for 21 Species and Proposed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: species.
    [Show full text]
  • Nekton Communities in Hawaiian Coastal Wetlands: the Distribution and Abundance of Introduced Fish Species
    Estuaries and Coasts (2012) 35:212–226 DOI 10.1007/s12237-011-9427-1 Nekton Communities in Hawaiian Coastal Wetlands: The Distribution and Abundance of Introduced Fish Species Richard Ames MacKenzie & Gregory L. Bruland Received: 1 December 2010 /Revised: 27 April 2011 /Accepted: 27 June 2011 /Published online: 19 July 2011 # Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract Nekton communities were sampled from 38 Keywords Gambusia affinis . Hawaii . Invasive fish . Hawaiian coastal wetlands from 2007 to 2009 using lift Poeciliidae . Tilapia . Tropical coastal wetlands nets, seines, and throw nets in an attempt to increase our understanding of the nekton assemblages that utilize these poorly studied ecosystems. Nekton were dominated by Introduction exotic species, primarily poeciliids (Gambusia affinis, Poecilia spp.) and tilapia. These fish were present in 50– Coastal wetlands on Pacific Islands provide valuable habitat 85% of wetlands sampled; densities were up to 15 times for endemic fauna and flora (Erickson and Puttock 2006) greater than native species. High densities of exotic fish that are utilized by Pacific Islanders for fiber, fuel, food, or were generally found in isolated wetlands with no connec- medicine (Naylor and Drew 1998; Drew et al. 2005; Balick tion to the ocean, were often the only nekton present, were 2009). Unfortunately, these ecosystems and the ecological positively correlated with surface water total dissolved services they provide are being lost at an alarming rate nitrogen, and were negatively correlated with native species (Dahl 1990; Kosaka 1990), and the remaining wetland richness. Native species were present in wetlands with habitat continues to be threatened by increased develop- complete or partial connection to the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fish Species (Pisces) of La Réunion, Including a Red List of Threatened and Declining Species
    Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 2: 1–168; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2009. 1 Annotated checklist of the fish species (Pisces) of La Réunion, including a Red List of threatened and declining species RONALD FR ICKE , THIE rr Y MULOCHAU , PA tr ICK DU R VILLE , PASCALE CHABANE T , Emm ANUEL TESSIE R & YVES LE T OU R NEU R Abstract An annotated checklist of the fish species of La Réunion (southwestern Indian Ocean) comprises a total of 984 species in 164 families (including 16 species which are not native). 65 species (plus 16 introduced) occur in fresh- water, with the Gobiidae as the largest freshwater fish family. 165 species (plus 16 introduced) live in transitional waters. In marine habitats, 965 species (plus two introduced) are found, with the Labridae, Serranidae and Gobiidae being the largest families; 56.7 % of these species live in shallow coral reefs, 33.7 % inside the fringing reef, 28.0 % in shallow rocky reefs, 16.8 % on sand bottoms, 14.0 % in deep reefs, 11.9 % on the reef flat, and 11.1 % in estuaries. 63 species are first records for Réunion. Zoogeographically, 65 % of the fish fauna have a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, while only 2.6 % are Mascarene endemics, and 0.7 % Réunion endemics. The classification of the following species is changed in the present paper: Anguilla labiata (Peters, 1852) [pre- viously A. bengalensis labiata]; Microphis millepunctatus (Kaup, 1856) [previously M. brachyurus millepunctatus]; Epinephelus oceanicus (Lacepède, 1802) [previously E. fasciatus (non Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775)]; Ostorhinchus fasciatus (White, 1790) [previously Apogon fasciatus]; Mulloidichthys auriflamma (Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775) [previously Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1831)]; Stegastes luteobrun- neus (Smith, 1960) [previously S.
    [Show full text]
  • Seriola Lalandi Dorsalis), Technological Advances Towards the Development of the Aquaculture Sector
    Quantifying Digestion in California Yellowtail (Seriola lalandi dorsalis), Technological Advances Towards the Development of the Aquaculture Sector The Graduate Division The University of Hawai‘i at Hilo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science: Tropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science Hilo, Hawai’i December 2016 By: George Rod Parish IV Thesis Committee: Armando Garciaa Charles Farwellbc Luke Gardnerbd Kevin Hopkinsa Barbara Blockbd a Pacific Aquaculture & Coastal Resources Center, College of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resource Management, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 1079 Kalanianaole Ave., Hilo, HI 96720, United States b Tuna Research and Conservation Center, 886 Cannery Row, Monterey, CA 93940, USA c Monterey Bay Aquarium, 886 Cannery Row, Monterey, CA 93940, USA d Biology Department, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iv List Of Figures .................................................................................................................................. vi List Of Tables .................................................................................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 I. Yellowtail
    [Show full text]