Security Council Official Records

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Security Council Official Records UNITED NATIONS I/ ,_(,,‘,“:, ,‘,I :<.-; SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-FIRST YEAR th 1966 MEETING: 1 NOVEMBER 1976 NEW YORK CONTENTS Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/l966) . 1 Expression of thanks to the retiring President . , . , . , , , . , , 1 Adoption of the agenda , . , . , . , . , , , . , . 1 The situation in the occupied Arab territories: Letter dated 20 October 1976 from the Permanent Representative of Egypt to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/12218) . , . , , . , . , . , . , . , . , , , . , . , . , , . , . 1 : ,‘:. _I S/PV. 1966 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/. .) are normally published in quarterly Supplcme~lt,s of the Official Racotds of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which infor- mation about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Resolt~tiom NM/ Decisions of’ the Security Council. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. 1966th MEETING Held in New York on Monday, 1 November 1976, at 3 p.m. President: Mr. ,Jorge Enrique ILLUECA (Panama). 2. The PRESIDENT (irtterpretatiort Jkm Spanish): The representatives of Egypt, Israel and Jordan Present: The representatives of the following States: have addressed letters to the President of the Security Benin, China, France, Guyana, Italy, Japan, Libyan Council in which they request to be invited to parti- Arab Republic, Pakistan, Panama, Romania, Sweden, cipate in the discussion of the item which has just been Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom included in the Council’s agenda, in accordance with of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic the relevant provisions of the Charter. In accordance, of Tanzania and United States of America. therefore, with the usual practice and with the provi- sions of Article 31 of the Charter and rule 37 of the Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/l966) provisional rules of procedure of the Council, and if there is no objection, I propose that we invite the 1. Adoption of the agenda representatives I have just mentioned to participate in the discussion without the right to vote. 2. The situation in the occupied Arab territories: Letter dated 20 October 1976 from the Permanent 3. The Security Council has before it a letter dated Representative of Egypt to the United Nations 20 October 1976 [S//2220] from the representative of addressed to the President of the Security Egypt requesting that the Palestine Liberation Organi- Council (S/12218) zation (PLO) be permitted to participate in the debate, This proposal is not made pursuant to rule 37 or rule 39 of the provisional rules of procedure of the Council, but if approved, the invitation to participate in Expression of thanks to the retiring President the debate would confer on the PLO the same rights of participation.as those conferred on Member States 1 I The PRESIDENT (interpretrrtim from Sjwrr- when invited to participate pursuant to rule 37. Does ish): Before the Council begins the work before it any member of the Security Council wish to speak today, I wish to pay tribute of appreciation and on this proposal? gratitude to Mr. Iqbal A. Akhund, representative of Pakistan, who presided over our work during October 4. Mr. BENNETT {United States of ‘America): with ‘his habitual skill. During his presidency, Mr. President, I might say at the outset that we look Mr. Akhund maintained a rhythm in the Security forward to the month under your leadership and we Council’s work comparable to that achieved by all appreciate the diligence with which the representative his predecessors this year. Thanks to his diplomatic of Pakistan conducted the Council’s affairs during skill and thorough knowledge of United Nations pro- the preceding month. cedures and usage, we can safely say that he carried out extremely constructive work. Among his many 5. The United States delegation is not able to agree accomplishments, Mr. Akhund can count a knowledge to your proposal, Mr. President, to invite representa- of Spanish, and therefore I can tell him that he acted tives of the PLO to take part in the debate of the with great sciio&~-as to the manner born-in every Security Council with the same rights of participation sense of the expression. I believe that I am speaking as a Member State would have under rule 37 of the on behalf of all members of the Council in paying this provisional rules of procedure. We realize that the tribute to Mr. Akhund, and I trust that he will accept Council has adopted this procedure on four occasions these expressions of appreciation and gratitude. this’ year, but we continue to believe that it is not consistent with the rules of procedure. Adoption of the agenda 6. The United States would not object to the Coun- cil’s granting the PLO a hearing under rule 39; that would, in our view, be the correct procedure and is the The situation in the occupied Arab territories: procedure that has been used for over 30 years on Letter dated 20 October 1976 from the Permanent similar occasions. representative of Egypt to the United Nations addressedto the President of the Security Council 7. For these reasons the United States requests that (S/12218) the proposal be put to the vote. 8. The PRESIDENT (interpretation j?om Spcrnish): “The Swedish Government holds that a settle- If no other member of the Council wishes to speak ment [of the Middle East question] must be based at this stage, I shall take it that the Council is ready on Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and to vote. 338 (1973). Israel and all other States in the area have the right to national existence and integrity within secure and recognized boundaries. The principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of 111fir~lorrr: Benin, China, Guyana, Japan, Libyan territory by force must be respected. Moreover, Arab Re.public, Pakistan, Panama, Romania, Sweden, it must be firmly established that the legitimate Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Republic national interests of the Palestinian Arabs must be of Tanzania satisfied. This includes their right to create their own State in peaceful coexistence with Israel. A,qrriust: United States of America Above all, it is essential that contacts be established without delay for the purpose of achieving an agreed Ahstc~ntions: France, Italy, United Kingdom of Great settlement.“* Britain and Northern Ireland. From that statement it follows that the interests of the Palestinian Arabs must not be satisfied in such a way as to infringe upon the existence and territorial integrity of Israel or on its right to secure and recog- 9. The PRESIDENT (interpwtcltim ficm Spclnish): nized boundaries. I shall now call on representatives who wish to explain their vote. 15. My delegation also wants to make it clear that the Swedish Government condemns terrorist acts IO. Mr. RYDBECK (Sweden): Mr. President, first wherever they take place. My delegation further of all, I want to tell you how pleased we are to see wants to point out that Sweden firmly objects to you in the Chair, that my delegation will give you its all attempts to equate Zionism with racism and full co-operation and support in carrying out your very colonialism. difficult task and that we are looking forward to this month under your presidency. 16. Finally, we should like to stress also that a deci- sion by the Council to let one party to a conflict I I. I should also like, on behalf of my delegation, which is not a State participate in the Council’s to express our warm appreciation to Mr. Akhund, debates implies an expectation that that party accepts last month’s President, for the way in which he the same responsibilities as a member State, that is, conducted our deliberations, in both open session to respect the sovereignty and integrity of member and consultations. I have noticed, as our membership States and to refrain from the threat or use of force of the Council draws to an end, that every month the in international relations. problems and difficulties increase and every month the demands on the President increase. We are extremely 17. The Swedish delegation finds it appropriate to happy to express our appreciation of the way in which make these observations in view of certain passages Mr. Akhund conducted very delicate and very difficult in the programmes and declarations made by the PLO negotiations during the past month. in the past. 12. As my delegation stated in the Security Council 18. Mr. OVINNIKOV (Union of Soviet Socialist on I4 January of this year [1872trd tueetittg], the Republics) (inrerprctcrtiotr fionr Rtasicrn): First of alI, Swedish Government is of the opinion that a recog- I should like to congratulate you, Mr. President, on nition of the legitimate national interests of the your assumption of the important post of President of Palestinian Arabs, including their right to create their the Security Council and to wish you success in the own State, also means a recognition of their right to performance of your responsible tasks. I should like put forward their views in international debates where to take this opportunity to express my gratitude tb their interests are involved. This debate gives such an your predecessor, Mr. Akhund, representative of. opportunity. Pakistan, for the skill and tact with which he conducted the proceedings of the Council last month.
Recommended publications
  • An Everlasting Love
    RABBANIT MIRIAM LEVINGER Torah Tidbits is honored to share a dvar house to brainstorm. Baruch Nachshon, Torah from an eminent female leader of the our Chabad artist, declared during this modern State of Israel. Rabbanit Levinger meeting that we deserved the setback. played a critical role in resettling the city of Our original plan was to settle in Hebron Chevron for the Jewish people. The Rabbanit proper, in the field of the Machpelah. He shares with us beautiful thoughts which warned us that the government decision relate to the unique love and passion the to build the suburb of Kiryat Arba would Jewish woman has for the Holy Land. result in no Hebron. He emphasized the importance of Jews living in the holy site of Hebron and the surrounding area. An The women in our meeting agreed with Nachshon and took the initiative. Everlasting By the next day, we had organized a group of women willing to move to Love Hebron with their children. Our hope was that the army would be hesitant to he story of “Bnot Tzelafchad” in remove us by force. I presented our plan this week’s Parsha, brings me back to my husband. His reaction was simple, Tevery year to the story of the group “I believe in the women” and went of women myself included settling in the immediately to organize those men who deserted building of Beit Hadassah. This would help. ordeal happened some years after my husband, Harav Moshe Levinger z”l and That week, it was decided we would a group of friends began the modern day move into Beit Hadassah.
    [Show full text]
  • Radicalization of the Settlers' Youth: Hebron As a Hub for Jewish Extremism
    © 2014, Global Media Journal -- Canadian Edition Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 69-85 ISSN: 1918-5901 (English) -- ISSN: 1918-591X (Français) Radicalization of the Settlers’ Youth: Hebron as a Hub for Jewish Extremism Geneviève Boucher Boudreau University of Ottawa, Canada Abstract: The city of Hebron has been a hub for radicalization and terrorism throughout the modern history of Israel. This paper examines the past trends of radicalization and terrorism in Hebron and explains why it is still a present and rising ideology within the Jewish communities and organization such as the Hilltop Youth movement. The research first presents the transmission of social memory through memorials and symbolism of the Hebron hills area and then presents the impact of Meir Kahana’s movement. As observed, Hebron slowly grew and spread its population and philosophy to the then new settlement of Kiryat Arba. An exceptionally strong ideology of an extreme form of Judaism grew out of those two small towns. As analyzed—based on an exhaustive ethnographic fieldwork and bibliographic research—this form of fundamentalism and national-religious point of view gave birth to a new uprising of violence and radicalism amongst the settler youth organizations such as the Hilltop Youth movement. Keywords: Judaism; Radicalization; Settlers; Terrorism; West Bank Geneviève Boucher Boudreau 70 Résumé: Dès le début de l’histoire moderne de l’État d’Israël, les villes d’Hébron et Kiryat Arba sont devenues une plaque tournante pour la radicalisation et le terrorisme en Cisjordanie. Cette recherche examine cette tendance, explique pourquoi elle est toujours d’actualité ainsi qu’à la hausse au sein de ces communautés juives.
    [Show full text]
  • An Mora Constrts
    Yitzchak Blau Rabbi Blau is a Ram at Yeshivat Hamivtar in Efrat, IsraeL. PLOUGHSHAS INTO SWORDS: CONTEMPORA RELIGIOUS ZIONISTS AN MORA CONSTRTS AUTHOR'S NOTE: When Jewish communities are threatened, we rightfully incline towards communal unity and are reluctant to engage in internal criti- cism. In the wake of recent events in Israel, some of which I have witnessed firsthand, one might question the appropriateness of publishing this article. Nevertheless, the article remains timely. It attempts to correct a perceived misrepresentation of yahadut, irrespective of political issues, and such a step is always relevant. Furthermore, the decision to delay our own moral ques- tioning during difficult times could lead in modern Israel to a de facto deci- sion never to raise such questions. Finally and most significantly, times of heightened anger, frustration and fear can cause cracks in the moral order to widen into chasms. I hope the reader will agree that the issues analyzed in the article remain very much worthy of discussion. The article does not advocate a particular political approach. While readers of a dovish inclination will no doubt find the article more congenial, it is the more right wing readers who truly stand to benefit from the discussion. It is precisely the militant excesses of the dati le)ummi world that enable and lead others to ignore their legitimate criticisms. The ability to combine a more right wing political view with a more moderate expression of Judaism would be both a kiddush hashem and more successful politically as well. "In ths situation of war for the land of our life and our eternal free- dom, the perfected form of our renewal appears: not just as the People of the Book-the galuti description given us by the genties- but rather as God's nation, the holy nation, possessors of the Divine Torah implanted therein, for whom the Book and the Sword descended intertwned from the heavens .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 13/17 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 1
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 13/17 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-31. Juli Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Neuer Chef für die Arbeitspartei ....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Zündstoff im Streit zwischen orthodoxen und liberalen Juden ......................................................................... 3 3. Empörung über Hebron-Entscheidung der UNESCO ...................................................................................... 5 4. Gewalt am Tempelberg .................................................................................................................................... 6 5. Eklat mit Jordanien .......................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Drei Tote bei Attentat in Halamish .................................................................................................................. 10 7. Medienquerschnitt .......................................................................................................................................... 12 1. Neuer Chef für die Arbeitspartei Knesset, lehnt er eine Große Koalition mit Benjamin Eine Absage erteilten die Genossen von Israels Netanyahus Likud entschieden ab. „Politisch bin ich Arbeitspartei den alten Hasen an der Spitze, als sie wie Yitzhak Rabin“, sieht er sich selbst auf den Spu- Avi Gabbay überraschend zum neuen Chef wählten. ren des 1995 ermordeten Regierungschefs
    [Show full text]
  • The Occupation and the Employment of the Israel Defense Forces
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2002-12 Breaking consensus : the occupation and the employment of the Israel Defense Forces Scoratow, Leon B. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/3316 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS BREAKING CONSENSUS: THE OCCUPATION AND THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES by Leon B Scoratow December 2002 Thesis Advisor: Glenn E Robinson Second Reader: Jeffrey Knopf Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2002 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Breaking Consensus: The Occupation and the 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Employment of the Israel Defense Forces 6. AUTHOR Leon B Scoratow, LT, USN 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS IS MY LAND... HEBRON a Film by Giulia Amati & Stephen Natanson
    THIS IS MY LAND... HEBRON a film by Giulia Amati & Stephen Natanson Note di Produzione “There is no place under the occupation that I hate more than Hebron... It is really the place of evil” Gideon Levy, HAARETZ reporter www.thisismylandhebron.com THIS IS MY LAND... HEBRON! PRESSBOOK! 2/5 ebron is the largest city in the middle of the occupied West Bank, 30 kilometers south of Jerusalem. It was famous throughout the Middle East as a market place where the caravans would stop between HDamascus and Egypt. Hebron is also famous as a holy city, a place of pilgrimage for the Jews, Christians and Muslims because Abraham, the forefather of the three most important monotheistic religions, is buried there. In 1967, after the Six-Day War and Israel’s dramatic military victory, 30 Israelis decided to settle in the city to reclaim what they considered an important part of the Promised Land. It was one of the first Israeli settlements and the only one right in the heart of a Palestinian city. Hebron is now home to 160,000 Palestinians, a colony of 600 Israeli settlers who live in the city center and a garrison of more than 2,000 Israeli soldiers to defend them. On April 4th 1968 Rabbi Moshe Levinger led a group of Jews pretending to be Swiss tourists into the Arab Park Hotel in the old city of Hebron. Two days later they seized control of the Hotel saying they have come to reestablish Hebron’s historic Jewish community. In 1970 the government agreed to allow Rabbi Levinger's group to establish a town on the outskirts of the city in an abandoned military base at Kiryat Arba.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SETTLERS a Shimon Dotan Film
    THE SETTLERS a Shimon Dotan film Produced by LES FILMS DU POISSON, Estelle Fialon TALISMA PRODUCTIONS, Jonathan Aroch FILMOPTION INTERNATIONAL, Paul Cadieux Co-produced by ARTE France, YES DOCU, NDR, BR, HR In association with Radio Canada, AB Thématiques, RTS, NRK, VPRO, SVT, DR With the support of CNC MEDIA Program of the European Union, Regional Council of Ile-de-France, Procirep Angoa, New Fund for Cinema and TV, Sundance Documentary Film Program, Hartley Film Foundation, Catapult Film Fund, J.S. Guggenheim Memorial Foundation World Sales Cinephil / Philippa Kowarsky Duration 110’ Languages Hebrew, Arabic, English English subtitles ONE-LINER Since Israel's decisive victory in the 1967 Six-Day War, hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens have made their homes in the Occupied Territories of the West Bank. With unprecedented access to pioneers of the settlement movement and a diverse group of modern-day settlers, religious and secular alike, The Settlers is a comprehensive exploration of the controversial communities that exert inordinate influence on the sociopolitical destinies of Israel and Palestine. SHORT SYNOPSIS Even though no Jews lived in the historic Jewish heartland of Judea and Samaria before the 1967 Six Day War, it is now home to hundreds of thousands of Jewish settlers, who are almost as diverse in their outlooks, origins, ideologies, and socioeconomic backgrounds as Israeli society itself. How did it happen? What drew them there? The story of Israeli settlements in the West Bank is an intriguing, unavoidable feature of modern Israeli life: complex and elusive in its early years, and increasingly wild and tragic as the years go by.
    [Show full text]
  • Gush Emunim • Partition
    Gush Emunim • Partition- war of independence o Gush Etzion • 1967- Six day war התנועה למען ארץ ישראל השלמה Greater land of Israel Movement The organization was formed in July 1967, a month after Israel captured the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights in the Six-Day War. It called on the Israeli government to keep the captured areas and to settle them with Jewish populations. Its founders were a mixture of Labor Zionists, Revisionists, writers and poets • Reestablishment of the Gush Etzion Bloc A loose organisation of Bnei Akiva activists, led by Hanan Porat, whose parents had been evacuated, petitioned Israeli prime minister Levi Eshkol to allow the reestablishment of Kfar Etzion. Construction began in September, 1967. • March 1968- Two Jewish men walk into the Palestinian Park Hotel in Hebron presented as Swiss tourists seeking to rent the entire building for the upcoming festival of Passover, and perhaps beyond. In a deal with the Israeli government, he moved with his family and followers to a former army base on a hill just northeast of Hebron, where, with the state's cooperation, they established the settlement of Kiryat Arba • Yom Kippur War October 1974 • Gush Emunim- founded 1974- goal to have West bank, Gaza and Golan Heights annexed as part of Israel • Began with a wedding at Sebastia- Ancient Israelite city of Shomron o Given permission to settle in an army base in Kedum o Leaders of the movement ▪ Chanan Porat ▪ Yoel ben Nun ▪ Moshe Levinger ▪ Menachem Froman ▪ Rav Tzvi Yehuda Kook • Their territorial demands were based on a religious ideology which viewed the whole of the Land of Israel, as described in the biblical texts, as having been promised to the Jewish people by God and, once conquered (or, in their terms, "liberated") in the "miraculous" events of the Six day war in June 1967, not to be relinquished voluntarily any form of non-Jewish (Arab) rule even through the democratic decisions of an elected government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Old City of Hebron Forced Population Transfer
    FORCED POPULATION TRANSFER: The Case of the Old City of Hebron FORCED POPULATION TRANSFER THE CASE OF OLD CITY OF HEBRON This Series of Working Papers on Forced Population Transfer constitutes a digestible overview of the forced displacement of Palestinians as a historic, yet ongoing process, which detrimentally affects the daily life of Palestinians and threatens their national existence. This case study provides a unique addition to the Series as it will BADIL explore the interrelation and interaction بـديـــــل Resource Center of each of the policies in one specific المركز الفلسطيني for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights location, Hebron’s Old City. BADIL hopes لمصـادر حقـــوق المواطنـة والـالجئيـن August 2016 to produce additional case studies with the aim of supplementing the Forced BADIL Population Transfer Series by illustrating بـديـــــل Resource Center the implementation of the nine policies املركز الفلسطيني for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights .throughout Mandate Palestine ملصـادر حقـــوق املواطنـة والـالجئيـن August 2016 Editor: Nidal Alazza Research team: Amaya al-Orzza, Ezees Silwady, Artemis Kubala, Ahmad Lahham, Halimeh al-Ubeidiya and Haya Abu Shkhaidem Copy-edit: Shaina Rose Low and Rachel Hallowell Design and Layout: Fidaa Ikhlayel and Atallah Salem ISBN: 978-9950-339-53-8 All rights reserved © BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights Forced Population Transfer: The Case of the Old City of Hebron August 2016 Credit and Notations Many thanks to all who have supported BADIL Resource Center throughout this research project and in particular to all interview partners who provided the foundation for this publication. Any quotation of up to 500 words may be used without permission provided that full attribution is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlements: Frequently Asked Questions
    West Bank Settlements: Frequently Asked Questions What is a settlement? “Settlement” is the term used to denote Israeli civilian communities built in territory conquered by Israel in the Six Day War of June 1967. This territory is comprised of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem), the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights and the Sinai Peninsula. These towns, villages and neighborhoods have been a major issue in the peace process since 1967 and remain highly controversial. Settlements in the Sinai were evacuated in 1979, following Israel’s historic peace agreement with Egypt and the return of the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt, and settlements in the Gaza Strip were evacuated as part of Israel’s unilateral “disengagement” from Gaza in 2005. Therefore, today settlements only exist in the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Golan Heights. Are settlements illegal? Most international lawyers consider settlements to be violations of Article 49, paragraph 6 of the Geneva Convention of 1949, which declares it illegal for an occupying force to transplant civilian populations into occupied lands. Israel’s High Court of Justice has refused to rule on the legality of settlements, while Israeli government attorneys have argued that the Geneva Convention does not apply to settlements. Who built the settlements? The Israeli government has directly and indirectly funded or subsidized the construction of settlements, spurring debate and controversy in the international community. In addition, settlements receive funding from outside sources, including non-profit organizations that fundraise for them in the United States. Why do people move to settlements? Some settlers move to the West Bank for economic reasons or because they seek to improve their quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Worldview of the Jewish Settlers in Hebron Hanne Eggen Røislien, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Norway
    urn:nbn:de:0070-ijcv-2007272 IJCV : Vol. 1 (2) 2007, pp.169–184 Living with Contradiction: Examining the Worldview of the Jewish Settlers in Hebron Hanne Eggen Røislien, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Norway Editorial (p. 91) Focus: Terrorism From Classical Terrorism to ‘Global’ Terrorism Michel Wieviorka (pp. 92 –104) Post-9/11 Terrorism Threats, News Coverage, and Public Perceptions in the United States Brigitte L. Nacos, Yaeli Bloch-Elkon, Robert Y. Shapiro (pp. 105–126) Attributions of Responsibility for Terrorist Attacks: The Role of Group Membership and Identification Bertjan Doosje, Sven Zebel, Marieke Scheermeijer, Pauline Mathyi (pp. 127– 141) A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Suicide Bombing Paul Gill (pp. 142–159) Suicide Bombers in Israel: Their Motivations, Characteristics, and Prior Activity in Terrorist Organizations Revital Sela-Shayovitz (pp. 160–168) Open Section Living with Contradiction: Examining the Worldview of the Jewish Settlers in Hebron Hanne Eggen Røislien (pp. 169 –184) Explaining the Long-Term Trend in Violent Crime: A Heuristic Scheme and Some Methodological Considerations Helmut Thome (pp. 185 –202) All text of the International Journal of Conflict and Violence is subject to the terms of the Digital Peer Publishing Licence. http://www.ijcv.org /docs/licence/DPPL_v2_en_06-2004.pdf IJCV : Vol. 1 (2) 2007, pp.169–184 Hanne Eggen Røislien: Living with Contradiction: Examining the Worldview of the Jewish Settlers in Hebron 170 Living with Contradiction: Examining the Worldview of the Jewish Settlers in Hebron Hanne Eggen Røislien, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Norway In the West Bank city of Hebron the Israeli-Palestinian conflict still overshadows all activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Israeli Settlers
    JONATHAN PESTE Radical Israeli Settlers Ultimate Concerns, Political Goals and Violence The focus of this article is the radical and activist parts of the wider Israeli settler community on the West Bank. This Radical Israeli Settler Movement should not be confused with the general settler community in the West Bank, even if the more radical groups often recruit their members from the general settler community. The Radical Israeli Settler Movement today includes groups such as Kach, The Committee for Safety on the Roads and The Jewish Legion. The purpose of this article is to analyse some instances of violence in the radical Israeli settler movement and to identify recur- ring features and processes in this violence. It will be argued that these features and processes are important factors in understanding why certain movements use violence. It will also be argued that future comparative studies are needed, which include other contexts where similar radical movements have become violent, in order to develop a general theory of ethno-religious movements using political violence. There are certain theoretical issues in the study of religious movements turning to political violence which have not been approached in a satisfac- tory way. To date, scholars have often tried to identify dangerous elements in religious movements. Examples of such elements are dualism, absolute truth claims, apocalypticism, millennialism, holy war and totalism in the form of demands of blind obedience by followers (Kimball 2002: 41–185; Selengut 2003: 17–48, 95–181). Scholars have also pointed to dangerous situations such as alienation, humiliation, socioeconomic decline and oc- cupation (Stern 2003: 9–62; Benjamin and Simon 2003: 408, 424; Pape 2005: 126).
    [Show full text]