DOCSLIB.ORG

(Department of Transportation) International Aviation Decisions (9 of 10) Box: 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Department of Transportation) International Aviation Decisions (9 of 10) Box: 17 Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files Folder Title: JGR/DOT (Department of Transportation) International Aviation Decisions (9 of 10) Box: 17 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ T :-' ~ .:/ ; i i T ~ >-1 0 U : : ~. March 17, 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW STAFF SECRETARY FROM: JOHN G. ROBERTS ASSOCIATE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT• SUBJECT: DOT International Aviation Decision: Marco Island Airways, Inc., and Aeron International Airlines, Inc. Our office has reviewed the above-referenced Department of Transportation International Aviation decision, and has no legal objection to the procedure that was followed with respect to Presidential review of such decisions under 49 U.S.C. § 146l(a). We also have no legal objection to OMB's recommendation that the President not disapprove this order or to the substance of the letter from the President to the Secretary of Transportation. 10 #_________ cu__ WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET 0 0 • OUTGOING D H • INTERNAL 0 I · INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) _.__ I ___ I __ Name of Correspondent: ___1)-""""-...:::.w-=--· 1_!.__ C,.;;;__~-------- • D Ml Mail Report UserCodes: (A) ____ (8) ___ (C) ___ Subject: !>CJ T L,~+~'""·<~·i o·""~ .l A-v I~~ c--.- \) e_<...~S t °""'-S C«. [\t\ ~~ rst ~ A\r~~'is, ..L ......_c.,_ ~ A-vr""-' ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD Cut-+oLL ORIGINATOR 8'io I 031 /3 Referral Note: Cu tlT I~ ~ i (o I 03 t (3 Referral Note: Referral Note: I Referral Note: ~--------------·---·-· Referral Note: ACTION CODES: DISPOSITION CODES: A . Appropriate Action I · Info Copy Only1No Action Necessary A· Answered C · Completed C . Comment/Recommendation R · Direct Reply w/Copy B · Non-Special Referral S • Suspended D · Draft Response S · For Signature F · Furnish Fact Sheet X • Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE: Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date : Date of Outgoing Comments:-----· ----------·-·--··----------------------- ------· , _____ , ___________ - --· -- Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 Document No. --------- WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM DATE: 3/12/86 ACTION/CONCURRENCEICOMMENTDUEBY: Wed., 3/19/86 . SUBJECT: DOT INTERNATIONAL AVIATION DECISIONS RE: Marco Island Airways, Inc. AND Aeron International Airlines, Inc. ACTION FYI ACTION FYI VICE PRESIDENT D 0 LACY 0 0 REGAN D D POINDEXTER D 0 MILLER D D RYAN D D BALL D D SPEAKES D 0 BUCHANAN 0 D SPRINKEL D 0 CHAVEZ 0 0 SVAHN ~ 0 CHEW OP oss THOMAS 0 0 DANIELS D 0 TUTTLE D 0 FIELDING ~o 0 0 HENKEL 0 0 0 D HICKS 0 0 0 0 KING ON 0 0 0 D REMARKS: Please provide any comments/recommendations by \\Tednesday, March 19. Thank you. RESPONSE: David L. Chew Staff Secretary Ext. 2702 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 MAR I 2 1986 nepc:rtment of Tr:an~portatiou Int~rnational .;,viation Decisi\.)ns: ~i.~1.r.::\; 1~:; 1.an~J ~~i r'°flfl~!~, !?tc. Aeron Internati0nal Airlin~s, Inc. u".::c~:'?t 43757 Docket 43582 f)ate (: 1~l?~: ;.1prt1_ 24, .1;186 Date due: May 5, 1986 'Phe D<~p.;.1 rtm,~nt. of 't'ran:~•ror tat lon (DOT) ?;Jr'.::>poses to t:'-l.l:e- thf:'? ~~Jlto·~,'i:.iq a-:;ticrrts t'1.it~1 r~qar{j to trre at.r.:),le int~rn;:1ti~::>n.~1~ .:;.. 1ii?lt.it.Jr1 ::l~;.~,r(:d~~ tJ~1ft ~ut!10.r i ty ~f "1arco Is tar1{1 A5 r~~~a;ts, !nc., to ';;nT;iq":: i 11 :'.nrP ign 8Ch~r?u1r:::d a:i r tr enspcr tat ion h~t'lc?{~en t:.1~ 0 :Jn) t.r~d St.at -;:; ·'.'Ind poi..nts in the Bahama IsL~nds, for- t~i.LL!.ure tc ~aintain operations. The carrier has n~t objected to the ~)t"' Oflf) SBt.:l ()!:"-:~er • \utnorlz~ Ae~on Int9rnational Airlines, Inc., to engage in w0rl~\1ide E?relqn charter air transportation of pro9ertv anJ :n~.il. Secur!tv Council and the Departments of State. ;! (_. .':: ~~ ~i ~- f~ , ]"u.::~tic~~ ha,1r,? ru)t !~t!~nt.if~.e(J. an~{ foreitJn ;)o1i(::~f ::Jr ·~ r.:: t L.:;y1 ·" 1 '':' 1 ~-:..1: ~)t f t:';f: cf '.'r~~:?,n<~qi~!T1ent a~1t1 B11t}rJet {<Ji"i~~) .~r~£;01:tmer1;J5 t)"1n.t y·o~i .,j~-:;;~·c;~;;:~ ~;~;- 1 s ~~~c~.sicH1~3 !.)y .iiq~1.nq th-~ -;tt~1.(;t~ef~ letter tc t:1f~ s~~~~t?:V ~~ic~ in~ic~t~s t~at vou ~o not ln~end to disaporov~ 1 ·:~<) '.'."' ' ~::i t.)r -'~ :~ r :::: ·~v <i, thin t !1e ~., 0 ,:1 3- ~1 s a .1 J.. o'J,~;e~-1 ;.1v a t.;-i t tl t ~e· fQ r :{otJ r ,:._·t../-:._c:~-r. :\l~...-,., t::-13 t"::Co~n~f:n:j::1 t~,at "f·C)t~ st.:?.tte 1_;.1 "';_-"()tl::: ~e,tt~r t~Eit ~se or forei0~ 00 1 1~7 reason und~rli~s your ~vl )~ J: ~;j1 .. <:~Sf::: r ~;~ 'i;· 1 h~~ t r:;.tre. r C?}Jt)() rt ;1 n i t'l is a.;,:r :3 ~ 2 .-='!;., ~~1 ~~ ~ !.." Q 1. ';"' • '_: r i:: '.Ff O r "i ~s~oci~t~ Dirqctor for l} i'.~:?::?rCJv,:~ D0'f 1 S Dr:.:1€·~S nno !'I:E'!':;<:trve '.'lh<".ttt:v~r op9ortunity is 3V~iJ.able for judicial revie~ (DOS. DOD, DOJ, NSC, '.J~·13) • -- Sign t~e attach~~ letter to t~e Secr~tary ) Anprove OOT's oruers and do nothinq to preserve w~~tev~r onportunttv is 3va1J.ahl2 ~nr judicia~ rev -- Imnl0mentattryn materials to b~ prepdred. ~.1) :o i. s ~:rp·pr ·JV·'.:: fJf)n~ ~J rd er '3. -- Implementation material3 to be oreoare3. THE \\!HITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Dear Madam Secr~tary: I have revi<~wed the orders proposed by the Department of 'Transportation in the following cases: ~arco Island Airways, Inc. Aeron International Airlines, Inc. Docl~et 43767 Docket 43582 I have decided not to disapprove the pror,>osed orders. No foreign r~lations or national defense reason underlies my actions. Sincerely, ~he Honorable Elizabeth Dole S8cret3ry of ~r~nsportation ~~s~lngton, D. c. 20S~O U.S. Department of Office of Assistant Secretary 400 Seventh St, SW Transportation Washington. D.C. 20590 Office of the Secretary of Transportation FEB 2 41986 The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500· Dear Mr. President: I transmit the Department's proposed order in the matter of the revocation of the foreign scheduled certificate of Marco Island Airways, Inc., for your consideration under section 80l{a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. The order will revoke the certificate of public convenience and necessity issued to Marco Island Airways authorizing the operation of foreign scheduled air transportation between the U.S. and the Bahama Islands and adopt the Department's tentative decision in its Order to Show Cause (copy enclosed), unless you disapprove it within 60 days of this transmittal. For your information, I am also enclosing the Department's Order which finalized the tentative findings and conclusions set forth in its Show-Cause Order and revoked the domestic certificates of this and five other carriers. If you should decide earlier that you will not disapprove, please advise me to that effect; this will allow the earlier issuance of the order. We are submitting the proposed decision to you before publication under the provisions of section 801(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. In accordance with Executive Order 11920, however, we plan to release all unclassified portions of the decision on or after the sixth day following this transmittal unless notified by your Ass·stant for Natio al Security Affairs. Enclosures ~~ ... (, t.'!: - ,, . .. .~ ! ~ : . \. d ~_sa·~ ;J~-~ ~~--~{· ~....... .. UNITED STATFS OF llMER ICA OEPMtTMENT OF 1RANSPffiTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRET~RY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation , on the 24th day of February, 19 86 Tn-tfie.matfer of-the-revocation of- - - : the air carrier certificates issued to: .: CHISUM FL YING SER VI Cf OF ALASKA, INC.: COMBS AIRWAYS, INC. Docket 4376 7 GELCO COLR IER SER VICES, INC. THE HAWAII EX~ESS, INC. HAWKINS & POWERS AVIATION, INC. AND I MM CO ISLAND AIR WAYS. •INC. under section 401 or section 418 of the Federal Aviation Act morn REVOKING CERTIFICATF By Order 86-2-42 issued February 24, 1986, the Department finalized the tentative findings and conclusions set forth in Order 86-1-73, and revoked the dcrnestic section 401 and 418 certificates of the carriers listed a~ove, because these carriers had ceased operations or were not operating under their certificates. and apparently had no intentions to commence or reccrnmence certificated service. By this order, we are revoking the foreign scheduled service certificate of Marco Island Airways, Inc. Instead of repeating our findings and conclusions in Order 86-1-73 we incorporate them here by reference. ACCCRDINGLY, 1. We revoke the certificate of public convenience and necessity issued to Marco Island Airways.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Airports Fact Sheet
    European Airports from the 1960s to the 1980s To support the commentary on this DVD, AVION VIDEO has produced this complimentary Fact Sheet listing all the aircraft featured, in the order of their first appearance. PLEASE RETURN THE SLIP BELOW TO RECEIVE A FREE CATALOGUE KLM Viscount V803 Pan American 707-121 BEA Vanguard V953 G-APEK USAF C9A Nightingale Trans Arabia Airways DC6B 9K-ABB Air France 727-200 TAP Caravelle VI-R CS-TCB Laker Airways DC10-10 G-AZZD Air Ceylon Comet 4 G-APDH Pan American 707-121 Air France L1049G Super Constellation F-BHBG Laker Airways BAC1-11 320AZ G-AVBY Iberia Caravelle VI-R EC-ARK Aeroamerica 720-027 KLM L188 Electra II Dan Air BAC 1-11 401AK G-AXCK Air France Caravelle III F-BHRU French A.F. Nord 262 Sabena CV440 Dan Air BAC 1-11 Qantas 707-138 VH-EBA French A.F. Noratlas 312 BA British Westpoint Airlines DC3 G-AJHY Intl. Caribbean Airways 707-138B G-AVZZ BOAC [Nigeria Airways] 707-436 G-ARRA French A.F. DC6A KLM Viscount V803 PH-VIA Jersey Airlines Herald Finnair Caravelle III Derby Airways DC3 Aer Lingus DC3 EI-AFA KLM Viscount V803 Iraqi Airways Viscount V735 YI-ACL Fairways Rotterdam DC3 PH-SCC JAT Caravelle VI-N YU-AHB Channel Airways Viking US Navy R4Y Channel Airways DC3 TWA 707-331 N763TW Aer Lingus F27 BOAC Comet 4 G-APDR Aer Lingus 720-048 EI-ALA Cunard Eagle Viscount V755 G-AOCB Sabena DC6B South African Airways 707-344 British Eagle Viscount 700 East African Airways Comet 4 VP-KPK Channel Airways Viscount 812 Dan Air 707-321 G-AZTG BKS Avro 748 Air France Concorde F-BVFA Dan Air DC3 Air France
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected]
    Equity Research Airlines / Rated: Market Underweight September 15, 2005 Research Analyst(s): David Strine 212 272-7869 [email protected] Bankruptcy tilts playing field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected] Key Points *** TWIN BANKRUPTCY FILINGS TILT PLAYING FIELD. NWAC and DAL filed for Chapter 11 protection yesterday, becoming the 20 and 21st airlines to do so since 2000. Now with 47% of industry capacity in bankruptcy, the playing field looks set to become even more lopsided pressuring non-bankrupt legacies to lower costs further and low cost carriers to reassess their shrinking CASM advantage. *** CAPACITY PULLBACK. Over the past 20 years, bankrupt carriers decreased capacity by 5-10% on avg in the year following their filing. If we assume DAL and NWAC shrink by 7.5% (the midpoint) in '06, our domestic industry ASM forecast goes from +2% y/y to flat, which could potentially be favorable for airline pricing (yields). *** NWAC AND DAL INTIMATE CAPACITY RESTRAINT. After their filing yesterday, NWAC's CEO indicated 4Q:05 capacity could decline 5-6% y/y, while Delta announced plans to accelerate its fleet simplification plan, removing four aircraft types by the end of 2006. *** BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES LIKELY TO BE LOW COST CARRIERS. NWAC and DAL account for roughly 26% of domestic capacity, which, if trimmed by 7.5% equates to a 2% pt reduction in industry capacity. We believe LCC-heavy routes are likely to see a disproportionate benefit from potential reductions at DAL and NWAC, with AAI, AWA, and JBLU in particular having an easier path for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Airline Deregulation: a Comparative Analysis*
    Dong-Ho Kim/ East Asian Journal of Business Management 6-3 (2016) 5-10 5 Print ISSN: 2234-3040 / Online ISSN: 2234-3059 doi: 10.13106/eajbm.2016.vol6.no3.5 [Editorial Review] The Effects of Airline Deregulation: A Comparative Analysis* Dongho Kim1 Received: June 2, 2016. Revised: July 1, 2016. Accepted: July 15, 2016 Abstract Purpose - The purpose of this study is to explore and examine the effects of airline deregulation in the United States and South Korea as a comparative analysis. The study focuses on identifying the purposes of airline deregulation and analyzing its benefits and consequences. Research Design, Data, and Methodology - This is a case study, a comparative method, which analyzes and meas- ures the benefits and disadvantages of airline deregulation in both the United States and South Korea. Results - Airline deregulation removed unnecessary and ineffective government controls, resulting in more efficient air- line industries in both countries. However, the negative consequences are much greater than the benefits of airline dere- gulation. Conclusion - The purpose of airline deregulation was to foster an efficient and effective environment in airline industry, and clear evidence of the positive intended effects of airline deregulation e.g., increasing domestic competition, decreas- ing airfare, increasing productivity, and removing unnecessary government regulations in the beginning of airline deregu- lation. However, the current state of airline industry in both countries depicts only the consequences of airline deregula- tion. Keywords: Airline Deregulation, Korea Airline Industry, U.S. Airline Industry. JEL Classifications: K2, L5, L9. 1. Introduction1 United States experienced fierce competition, mergers and acquisitions, financial losses and bankruptcies, and union Many scholars and practitioners suggest that airline de- issues and disputes until 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States Northwest Airlines, Inc
    Cite as: 531 U. S. ____ (2000) 1 O’CONNOR, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. JULIE DUNCAN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 00–404. Decided December 11, 2000 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O’Connor, with whom The Chief Justice and Justice Thomas join, dissenting. The petition for a writ of certiorari in this case presents an important issue that has divided the Courts of Appeals: the meaning of the term “service” in the portion of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) that pre-empts any state law “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier.” 49 U. S. C. §41713(b)(1). I would grant the peti- tion to resolve this issue and bring needed certainty to this area of the law. We have addressed the scope of the ADA’s pre-emption provision on two prior occasions. In Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U. S. 374, 383 (1992), we noted the “broad pre-emptive purpose” of the ADA. And while we have never directly addressed the definition of “service” within the meaning of §41713(b)(1), we have suggested that this term encompasses “access to flights and class-of- service upgrades.” American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens, 513 U. S. 219, 226 (1995). The Courts of Appeals, however, have taken directly conflicting positions on this question of statutory interpretation. The Ninth Circuit below, adhering to its decision in Charas v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport Activity
    Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World 10-12 November 2008, Guadalajara, Mexico The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport A ctivity Past trends and future perspectives Ken Button, School of George Mason University, USA NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT This paper was prepared by Prof. Ken Button of School of George Mason University, USA, as a contribution to the OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World that will be held 10-12 November 2008 in Guadalajara, Mexico. The paper discusses the impacts of increased globalisation on international air traffic activity – past trends and future perspectives. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ............................................................................................................. 2 THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ACTIVITY - PAST TRENDS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Globalization and internationalization .................................................................................................. 5 3. The Basic Features of International Air Transportation ....................................................................... 6 3.1 Historical perspective .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchy in the Airways Joseph C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Florida International University Hospitality Review Volume 5 Article 10 Issue 1 Hospitality Review Volume 5/Issue 1 1-1-1987 Anarchy In The Airways Joseph C. Von Kornfeld University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/hospitalityreview Recommended Citation Von Kornfeld, Joseph C. (1987) "Anarchy In The Airways," Hospitality Review: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/hospitalityreview/vol5/iss1/10 This work is brought to you for free and open access by FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hospitality Review by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anarchy In The Airways Abstract In his dialogue - Anarchy In The Airways - Joseph C. Von Kornfeld, Assistant Professor, College of Hotel Administration, University of Nevada, Las Vegas initially states: “Deregulation of the airline industry has brought about financial vulnerability for the traveling public. The uthora analyzes the situation since that point in time and makes recommendations for some solutions.” In this article, Assistant Professor Von Kornfeld, first defines the airline industry in its pre-regulated form. Then he goes into the ramifications and results of deregulating the industry, both in regards to the consumer, and in deregulation’s impact on the airlines themselves. “The most dramatic consequence of the pressures and turbulence of airline deregulation has been the unprecedented proliferation of airline bankruptcies,” Von Kornfeld informs.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Carriers' Limitation of Liability and Air Passengers' Accident Compensation Under the Warsaw Convention Peter H
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 28 | Issue 3 Article 4 1962 Air Carriers' Limitation of Liability and Air Passengers' Accident Compensation under the Warsaw Convention Peter H. Sand Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Peter H. Sand, Air Carriers' Limitation of Liability and Air Passengers' Accident Compensation under the Warsaw Convention, 28 J. Air L. & Com. 260 (1962) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol28/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. AIR CARRIERS' LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND AIR PASSENGERS' ACCIDENT COMPENSATION UNDER THE WARSAW CONVENTON By PETER H. SANDt The author was awarded the 1962 Braniff Essay Award in Aviation Law, an annual award in memory of the late Thomas E. Braniff, airline pioneer, established by Roger J. Whiteford and Hubert A. Schneider of the law firm of Whiteford, Hart, Carmody and Wilson, Washington, D.C. This article first appeared in the American Journal of Comparative Law and is reprinted here through the courtesy of that journal. O N September 22, 1961, the U.S. Interagency Group on Interna- tional Aviation (IGIA)' invited comments on the relationship of the United States to the Hague Protocol amending the Warsaw Con- vention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by air.' Specifically, two questions were posed: (1) whether or not the State Department should recommend that the President with- draw the request to the Senate for advice and consent to the Hague Proto- col; (2) whether or not the United States should withdraw from partici- pation in the Warsaw Convention by giving the required six months' notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mary's Airport Planning and Rsa Practicability Study
    ST. MARY’S AIRPORT PLANNING AND RSA PRACTICABILITY STUDY Project Number Z605630000 AIP Number 3-02-0017-XXX-201X AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST Prepared For: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared By: HDL Engineering Consultants, LLC 3335 Arctic Boulevard Anchorage, Alaska 99503 August 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Population ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 4 3.0 Geographic Attributes ........................................................................................ 4 3.1 Air Freight Hub ........................................................................................... 5 3.2 River Freight Hub ....................................................................................... 7 4.0 Economic Characteristics.................................................................................. 7 5.0 Aviation Activity ................................................................................................. 8 6.0 Aircraft Operations ............................................................................................. 9 7.0 Passenger Enplanements ................................................................................ 11 8.0 Air Cargo ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]