DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Mary's Airport Planning and Rsa Practicability Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Mary's Airport Planning and Rsa Practicability Study ST. MARY’S AIRPORT PLANNING AND RSA PRACTICABILITY STUDY Project Number Z605630000 AIP Number 3-02-0017-XXX-201X AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST Prepared For: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared By: HDL Engineering Consultants, LLC 3335 Arctic Boulevard Anchorage, Alaska 99503 August 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Population ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 4 3.0 Geographic Attributes ........................................................................................ 4 3.1 Air Freight Hub ........................................................................................... 5 3.2 River Freight Hub ....................................................................................... 7 4.0 Economic Characteristics.................................................................................. 7 5.0 Aviation Activity ................................................................................................. 8 6.0 Aircraft Operations ............................................................................................. 9 7.0 Passenger Enplanements ................................................................................ 11 8.0 Air Cargo ........................................................................................................... 12 8.1 Bypass mail ............................................................................................. 13 8.2 Freight ...................................................................................................... 15 9.0 Factors Affecting Operations .......................................................................... 16 9.1 Jet Aircraft with Gravel Kits ...................................................................... 16 9.2 Aging DC-6 fleet ...................................................................................... 17 9.3 Runway Length ........................................................................................ 17 9.4 Runway Surfacing .................................................................................... 19 9.5 Forecast Scenario: Gravel Runway 17/35 ............................................... 19 9.6 Alternative Forecast Scenario: Paved Runway 17/35 .............................. 22 9.7 Comparison to Other Forecasts ............................................................... 24 10.0 Critical Aircraft, AAC, and ADG ....................................................................... 25 10.1 Required Length for Runway 17/35 ......................................................... 26 10.1.1 Minimum amount of fuel carried .............................................................. 27 10.1.2 Reported Payload .................................................................................... 27 10.2 Required Length for Runway 06/24 ......................................................... 30 11.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 32 Appendix A: Inventory and Description of Existing Facilities .................................. 1 Appendix B: Aviation System Plan Resources .......................................................... 1 Appendix C: Air Carrier/Airport User Interviews and Phone Logs ........................... 1 Appendix D: Air Carrier/Airport User Survey Responses .......................................... 1 Appendix E: Population and Socioeconomic Information ........................................ 1 Appendix F: Detailed Aviation Activity Tables ........................................................... 1 Appendix G: Detailed Aviation Forecasts ................................................................... 1 i Aviation Forecast ADOT&PF St. Mary’s Airport Figures Figure 1: Project Location ............................................................................................... 1 Figure 2: 2017 Bypass Mail Volume to and from St. Mary's Airport ................................ 5 Figure 3: Freight Leaving St. Mary's .............................................................................. 16 Figure 3: Runway 17/35 length based on AC 150/5324-4B Figure 3.1 90% useful load ................................................................................................................ 29 Figure 4: Runway 6/24 Required Length based on AC150/5325-4B Figure 2-1 ........... 31 Tables Table 1: Historical and Projected Population Data, St. Mary’s, Alaska ........................... 4 Table 2: Airports Within 100 Miles of St. Mary’s .............................................................. 6 Table 3: Reporting Air Carriers ........................................................................................ 9 Table 4: Annual Operations by Design Group, 2017 ..................................................... 10 Table 5: Destinations for Passengers Leaving St. Mary's ............................................. 12 Table 6: Historical and Forecast Enplanements, KSM .................................................. 12 Table 7: St. Mary’s Airport Total Mail Summary, 2002-2017 ......................................... 14 Table 8: St. Mary’s Annual Freight, 2002-2017 ............................................................. 15 Table 9: Possible DC-6 Replacement Aircraft ............................................................... 17 Table 10: KSM Runway Length Requirements For a Selection of Operating Aircraft ............................................................................................................ 19 Table 11: Aviation Forecast Gravel Runway ................................................................. 21 Table 12: Aviation Forecast Paved Runway .................................................................. 23 Table 13: Airport Forecast Comparisons (Operations per Year) ................................... 24 Table 14: Critical Aircraft ............................................................................................... 25 Table 15: Critical Aircraft for Planning Purposes ........................................................... 26 August 2018 Aviation Forecast ADOT&PF St. Mary’s Airport Abbreviations AAC ........................................................................................ Aircraft Approach Category AASP .................................................................................... Alaska Aviation System Plan AC .......................................................................................................... Advisory Circular ACC .................................................................................... Alaska Commercial Company ADG .............................................................................................. Airplane Design Group ADOL ......................................Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development AF........................................................................................................... Aviation Forecast ALP ..................................................................................................... Airport Layout Plan ARC .............................................................................................. Airport Reference Code AVEC ......................................................................... Alaska Village Electric Cooperative AWOS .............................................................. Automated Weather Observation System Boreal ............................................................................................... Boreal Fisheries, Inc. BTS ............................................................................ Bureau of Transportation Statistics CDP .......................................................................................... Census Designated Place CONUS ..................................................................................... Contiguous United States DMM ............................................................................................... Domestic Mail Manual DOT&PF ................... State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities FAA .................................................................................. Federal Aviation Administration Fishpeople ......................................................................................... Fishpeople Seafood GA ........................................................................................................... General Aviation GRA ........................................................................................... Grey Relational Analysis IFR ................................................................................................Instrument Flight Rules ILS .......................................................................................... Instrument Landing System KSM ....................................................................................................... St. Mary’s Airport Kwikpak ........................................................................................ Kwikpak Fisheries, LLC Lynden .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No
    Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No. NFAPT00291 December 2020 Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update December 2020 State Program Number NFAPT00291 DRAFT Alternatives Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Northern Region 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 725 E Fireweed Lane, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99503 Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No. NFAPT00291 December 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................8-III 8 ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................................................8-4 8.1 ALTERNATIVES OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................8-4 8.2 RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES .....................................................................................................................8-4
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • August 2020 9/22/2020
    JOHN GLENN COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Monthly Activity Report | August 2020 9/22/2020 PASSENGERS Total Passengers - Monthly Total Passengers - Year to Date Actual Percent Actual Percent Airline 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change Change Change Change Air Canada Express - 6,881 -6,881 -100.0% 9,500 49,873 -40,373 -81.0% Alaska 4,983 8,321 -3,338 -40.1% 32,191 48,081 -15,890 -33.0% American 54,615 178,793 -124,178 -69.5% 539,521 1,364,292 -824,771 -60.5% Delta 39,530 169,765 -130,235 -76.7% 414,257 1,219,149 -804,892 -66.0% Frontier 4,127 11,314 -7,187 -63.5% 31,578 79,074 -47,496 -60.1% Southwest 83,081 227,487 -144,406 -63.5% 828,263 1,891,271 -1,063,008 -56.2% Spirit 19,723 33,135 -13,412 -40.5% 161,028 308,445 -147,417 -47.8% United 25,420 100,227 -74,807 -74.6% 262,542 737,649 -475,107 -64.4% AIRLINES TOTALS 231,479 735,923 -504,444 -68.5% 2,278,880 5,697,834 -3,418,954 -60.0% CHARTER TOTALS 617 1,517 -900 -59.3% 9,291 28,997 -19,706 -68.0% AIRPORT TOTALS 232,096 737,440 -505,344 -68.5% 2,288,171 5,726,831 -3,438,660 -60.0% CARGO Total Cargo (Freight and Mail) - Monthly Total Cargo (Freight and Mail) - Year-To-Date Actual Percent Actual Percent Airline 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change Change Change Change Alaska 51,752 35,047 16,705 47.7% 115,122 173,379 -58,257 -33.6% American 34,506 145,812 -111,306 -76.3% 516,109 1,189,222 -673,113 -56.6% Delta 109,455 189,574 -80,119 -42.3% 854,336 1,356,604 -502,268 -37.0% Southwest 236,161 424,511 -188,350 -44.4% 2,386,755 3,157,189 -770,434 -24.4% United 11,804 101,862 -90,058 -88.4% 243,792 786,206 -542,414
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombardier Learjet 35A
    Contact Pilot Maintenance Us Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Share Next Bombardier Learjet 35A Professional Pilot and Technician Training Programs Updated 10/16 Contact Pilot Maintenance Us Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Share Prev Next FlightSafety offers comprehensive, professional training on Bombardier’s full line of business aircraft, including the Learjet 35A. Our highly qualified and experienced instructors, advanced-technology flight simulators and integrated training systems help ensure proficiency and safety. Pilot training for the Learjet 35A is available at FlightSafety’s Learning Centers in Atlanta, Georgia and Tucson, Arizona. Maintenance technicians train for the Learjet 35A at our Tucson Learning Center. Innovation With One Purpose: Training Corporate Aviation Professionals for Safety and Proficiency FlightSafety International is the world’s leading aviation training organization. The leader in experience. The leader in technological innovation. The leader in global reach. FlightSafety serves the world’s aviation community providing total aviation training for pilots, maintenance technicians and other aviation professionals. We serve business, commercial, general and military aviation with training for virtually Experienced all fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters. We live, breathe and ThinkSafety. Instructors, FlightSafety provides training for the Bombardier Global series, Bombardier Challenger and Bombardier Learjet. Superior We offer business aviation pilots and maintenance technicians of Bombardier aircraft the resources to achieve proficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Optimal Replacement of Aging Air Force Systems
    R Investigating Optimal Replacement of Aging Air Force Systems Edward G. Keating, Matthew Dixon Prepared for the United States Air Force Project AIR FORCE Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Keating, Edward G. (Edward Geoffrey), 1965- Investigating optimal replacement of aging Air Force systems / Edward G. Keating, Matthew C. Dixon. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1763.” ISBN 0-8330-3483-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States. Air Force—Procurement—Mathematical models. 2. KC–135 (Tanker aircraft) 3. Lear jet aircraft. 4. Jet transports—United States—Maintenance and repair— Mathematical models. I. Dixon, Matthew C. II. Title. UG1123.K43223 2003 358.4'1621—dc22 2003020469 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2003 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2003 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] iii Preface Whether to maintain or replace an aging system is a common decision.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 December, 2014 Page 1 TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures And
    TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures and Enplaned Passengers, Freight, and Mail by Carrier Group, Air Carrier, and Type of Service: 2013 ( Major carriers ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aircraft Departures Enplaned revenue-tones Carrier Group Service Total Enplaned by air carrier performed Scheduled passengers Freight Mail -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AIRTRAN AIRWAYS CORPORATION Scheduled 180839 180839 16981158 3805.66 0.00 Nonscheduled 265 0 24001 0.00 0.00 All services 181104 180839 17005159 3805.66 0.00 ALASKA AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 163024 144518 18790133 56523.36 14900.45 Nonscheduled 350 0 30339 6.68 0.00 All services 163374 144518 18820472 56530.04 14900.45 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 605490 615858 75933862 261945.98 23586.00 Nonscheduled 845 0 99666 3.30 0.00 All services 606335 615858 76033528 261949.28 23586.00 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 449441 464956 16919502 711.46 14.79 Nonscheduled 221 0 3595 2.17 0.36 All services 449662 464956 16923097 713.63 15.15 ATLAS AIR INC. Nonscheduled 9500 0 117446 517402.27 0.00 DELTA AIR LINES INC. Scheduled 813691 814641 108586236 281545.61 107903.02 Nonscheduled 5515 0 274773 2.26 0.00 All services 819206 814641 108861009 281547.87 107903.02 EXPRESSJET AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 771398 793645 31429104 35.75 0.34 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION Scheduled 264207 264207 0 5896750.13 4348.56 Nonscheduled 141 0 0 1613.58 0.00 All services 264348 264207 0 5898363.71 4348.56 FRONTIER AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 76294 76701 10038474 3610.99 0.00 Nonscheduled 2107 0 242143 0.00 0.00 All services 78401 76701 10280617 3610.99 0.00 HAWAIIAN AIRLINES INC.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NORTHERN AIR CARGO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) Civil Action No. 10-2076 (EGS) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2010, the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) granted an equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) on five mainline routes in rural Alaska pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(5)(c) (“§ 5402(g)(5)(C)”). This equitable tender is now being challenged by three mainline carriers – Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”), Tatonduk Outfitters Ltd d/b/a Everts Air Cargo (“Everts”), and Lynden Air Cargo LLC (“Lynden”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the Postal Service’s purportedly ultra vires determination that PenAir had satisfied the “Prior Service and Capacity Requirement” of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II) (“§ 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II)”) as of Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 25 December 3, 2010.1 Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. See generally Compl. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as well as the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Postal Service and Defendant-Intervenor PenAir (collectively, “defendants”). Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
    [Show full text]