Air Safety in Southwest Alaska Capstone Baseline Safety Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air Safety in Southwest Alaska Capstone Baseline Safety Report FAA Capstone Program Baseline Report April 2001 Air Safety in Southwest Alaska Capstone Baseline Safety Report prepared by: Matthew Berman Alexandra Hill Leonard Kirk Stephanie Martin prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Alaska Region January 2001 Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 FAA Capstone Program Baseline Report April 2001 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose of Study.....................................................................................................................1 1.2. Description of the Capstone Area...........................................................................................2 1.3. Air Operations In The Capstone Area ....................................................................................2 1.3. Air Operations In The Capstone Area ....................................................................................3 1.4. Review of Recent Studies.......................................................................................................3 2. Aviation Accidents and Incidents in the Capstone Area ................................................................5 2.1. Summary.................................................................................................................................5 2.2. Accidents in Alaska and the Capstone area ............................................................................5 2.3. Accident rates .........................................................................................................................9 2.4. Accidents Potentially Preventable by Capstone Equipment.................................................15 Decision Rules and Assumptions .................................................................................................15 3. Commercial Operations................................................................................................................21 3.1. Air Carriers and Commercial Operators...............................................................................21 3.2. Employees.............................................................................................................................23 3.3. Aircraft as of October 1999 ..................................................................................................24 3.4. Avionics in Capstone Operator Aircraft as of October 1999................................................25 4. Capstone Area Aviation Facilities ................................................................................................26 4.1. Airport Facilities...................................................................................................................26 4.2. Runway Characteristics ........................................................................................................28 4.3. Instrument Approaches.........................................................................................................29 4.4. FAA Facilities.......................................................................................................................30 4.5. Communications Facilities ...................................................................................................30 4.6. Weather Reporting Facilities ................................................................................................32 4.7. Navigation Facilities in the Capstone Area ..........................................................................34 5. Safety programs............................................................................................................................35 5.1. FAA Requirements ...............................................................................................................35 5.2. Capstone Operator Safety Programs.....................................................................................35 6. FAA Surveillance .........................................................................................................................36 7. Weather.........................................................................................................................................37 7.1. Common Weather Hazards In Capstone Area......................................................................37 7.2. Weather Variability ..............................................................................................................37 7.3. Weather Data Summary........................................................................................................38 8. Baseline Pilot Survey....................................................................................................................40 8.1. Purpose .................................................................................................................................40 8.2. Administration ......................................................................................................................40 8.3. Results ..................................................................................................................................41 Section A. Pilot Characteristics ....................................................................................................42 Section B. Training.......................................................................................................................43 Section C. Opinions About Safety and Capstone .........................................................................45 Section D. Pilot Experiences Relevant to Capstone Use ..............................................................49 Pilot Comments ............................................................................................................................50 FAA Capstone Program Baseline Report April 2001 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose of Study This report provides the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) with information on air safety and aviation infrastructure in the Capstone program area as of January 1999. The data will establish a baseline to enable the UAA to conduct an independent study addressing the safety effects that result from Capstone. The Alaskan Region’s "Capstone Program" is an accelerated effort to improve aviation safety and efficiency through installation of government-furnished avionics equipment into aircraft in a select region of Alaska. This joint industry and FAA effort installs GPS (Global Positioning System) based avionics and data link communications suites in 150 commercial aircraft serving the Yukon- Kuskokwim delta area of Alaska. In addition to the on-board avionics systems, Capstone will deploy a ground infrastructure for weather observation, data link communications, surveillance, and Flight Information Services (FIS). Capstone will also increase the number of airports served by an instrument approach. The FAA hopes that these improvements will reduce the number of mid-air collisions, controlled flight into terrain incidents, and weather-related accidents in the Capstone area. The name "Capstone" is derived from the program’s effect of drawing and holding together concepts and recommendations contained in reports from the Radio Telecommunications Conference of America (RTCA), the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the Mitre Corporation’s Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD), and Alaskan aviation industry representatives. The FAA selected the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region of Alaska for the Capstone trial (Capstone Program Plan, 1999; p. 21). Virtually all the commercial aircraft serving this area fly out of the Bethel airport or seaplane base. We focus our safety inquiry on Air Carriers conducting passenger and cargo operations under parts 121 and 135, respectively, of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) (14CFR, Chapter 1), since aircraft owned by these companies serving the Bethel area will be receiving Capstone avionics. However, general aviation aircraft also operate in the area, as do a limited number of military planes and private carriers not regulated under parts 121 and 135. We therefore consider the safety record of aviation overall in the study area. Although we present data on safety incidents occurring over the past ten or more years, we emphasize the safety record during the most recent five years; e.g., from 1995 through 1999. Two challenges confront such a safety analysis. First, a significant regulatory change during this period confounds attempts to interpret aviation statistics. Second, data on air traffic in Alaska are limited and problematic. We briefly explain each of these issues. In early 1997, the FAA dramatically increased the scope of commercial aviation regulated under the more restrictive part 121. Since March 20, 1997, all scheduled service using turbojet aircraft or aircraft with 10 or more passenger seats falls under part 121. The impact of this regulatory change on flight operations is not known. However, it is likely that many companies providing passenger service adjusted their fleets to avoid the cost of recertification under part 121. In addition, some service conducted under part 135 prior to 1997 has probably since been converted under part 121, as presumably intended by the FAA. This regulatory change makes it difficult
Recommended publications
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No
    Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No. NFAPT00291 December 2020 Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update December 2020 State Program Number NFAPT00291 DRAFT Alternatives Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Northern Region 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 725 E Fireweed Lane, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99503 Valdez Pioneer Field Airport Master Plan Update State Program No. NFAPT00291 December 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................................................... 8-II LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................8-III 8 ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................................................8-4 8.1 ALTERNATIVES OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................8-4 8.2 RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES .....................................................................................................................8-4
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Bethel, Alaska
    Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Bethel, Alaska By Joseph M. Dorava and Eppie V. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 95-173 Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Anchorage, Alaska 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Open-File Reports Section Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 Box25286, MS 517 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................... 1 Background............................................................... 1 Location.............................................................. 1 History and socioeconomics .............................................. 3 Physical setting ............................................................ 3 Climate .............................................................. 3 Vegetation............................................................ 5 Bedrock geology ....................................................... 5 Surficial geology and soils ............................................... 5 Hydrology ................................................................ 8 Surface water ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WINGS of SILVER PIPER J-3 Cub OPERATIONS MANUAL &
    WINGS OF SILVER PIPER J-3 Cub OPERATIONS MANUAL & POH (this Manual and POH is not intended for flight and is intended only for flight simulation use) Written by Mitchell Glicksman, © 2009 i Table of Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The 747 Captain Who Forgot How to Fly................................................................................................................................................................8 A Short History of a Small Airplane......................................................................................................................................................................13 Quick Start Guide...................................................................................................................................................................................................18 System Requirements........................................................................................................................................................................................18 Installation.........................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Settings..............................................................................................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement
    Revenue Accounting Manual B16 ATTACHMENT F – PARTICIPANTS IN THE AGREEMENT 1. TABULATION OF PARTICIPANTS 0B 475 BLUE AIR AIRLINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. 1A A79 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 1B A76 SABRE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. 1G A73 Travelport International Operations Limited 1S A01 SABRE INC. 2D 54 EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC 2I 156 STAR UP S.A. 2I 681 21 AIR LLC 2J 226 AIR BURKINA 2K 547 AEROLINEAS GALAPAGOS S.A. AEROGAL 2T 212 TIMBIS AIR SERVICES 2V 554 AMTRAK 3B 383 Transportes Interilhas de Cabo Verde, Sociedade Unipessoal, SA 3E 122 MULTI-AERO, INC. DBA AIR CHOICE ONE 3J 535 Jubba Airways Limited 3K 375 JETSTAR ASIA AIRWAYS PTE LTD 3L 049 AIR ARABIA ABDU DHABI 3M 449 SILVER AIRWAYS CORP. 3S 875 CAIRE DBA AIR ANTILLES EXPRESS 3U 876 SICHUAN AIRLINES CO. LTD. 3V 756 TNT AIRWAYS S.A. 3X 435 PREMIER TRANS AIRE INC. 4B 184 BOUTIQUE AIR, INC. 4C 035 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL 4L 174 LINEAS AEREAS SURAMERICANAS S.A. 4M 469 LAN ARGENTINA S.A. 4N 287 AIR NORTH CHARTER AND TRAINING LTD. 4O 837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. 4S 644 SOLAR CARGO, C.A. 4U 051 GERMANWINGS GMBH 4X 805 MERCURY AIR CARGO, INC. 4Z 749 SA AIRLINK 5C 700 C.A.L. CARGO AIRLINES LTD. 5J 203 CEBU PACIFIC AIR 5N 316 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY NORDAVIA - REGIONAL AIRLINES 5O 558 ASL AIRLINES FRANCE 5T 518 CANADIAN NORTH INC. 5U 911 TRANSPORTES AEREOS GUATEMALTECOS S.A. 5X 406 UPS 5Y 369 ATLAS AIR, INC. 50 Standard Agreement For SIS Participation – B16 5Z 225 CEMAIR (PTY) LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Yukon Kuskokwim Delta YKTPTRANSPORTATION PLAN Executive Summary March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose I The purpose of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan (Plan) is to inventory transportation facilities and issues, and document transportation needs. The Plan identifies, prioritizes, and recommends the top five regionally significant projects1 for each mode of transportation (aviation, marine, and surface) in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (Y-K Delta). The Y-K Delta is in critical Yukon Kuskokwim Delta need of basic infrastructure necessary for daily life activitiesYKTP including TRANSPORTATION PLAN transportation, facilities, housing, water and sewer, and utilities. The Plan is a 20-year, multimodal, regional transportation plan including various vehicle fleets (e.g. planes, all-terrain vehicles [ATVs], snow machines, barges, skiffs, and automobiles), and modes (e.g. aviation, surface, and marine) of transportation. The Plan is one of six area transportation plans being incorporated into the Alaska Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This is an update to the original Y-K Delta Transportation Plan (2002 YKTP). The Plan is not a programing document. Communities, tribal and city governments, and funding agencies should use this plan as a tool to secure funding for projects from multiple funding sources. The vision for the Plan is: Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan VISION STATEMENT The Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan will guide transportation decisions in the Yukon- Kuskokwim region by promoting safety, livability, economic development, and intermodal connectivity throughout the transportation system. 1 A regionally significant project is one that provides connection between two or more communities; provides access to public facilities such as hospitals, schools, jobs etc.; or March 2018 provides access to alternative modes of transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLE 5 Assigned-Space Aircraft Parking
    ARTICLE 5 Assigned-Space Aircraft Parking Section 500. Assigned-space aircraft parking designation. 510. Assigned-space use and fees. 520. Assigned-space permit application. 530. Assigned-space permit. 540. Cancellation of an assigned-space permit. 550. Assigned-space permit lottery. 560. Assigned-space switch list. 570. Assigned-space wait list. 580. Birchwood airport transitional compliance requirements. 590. Definitions. 17 AAC 45.500. Assigned-space aircraft parking designation. (a) The commissioner will designate an airport for assigned-space aircraft parking if the commissioner determines in writing that the designation is in the best interest of the state. In making this determination, the commissioner will consider the applicable factors set out at 17 AAC 45.900 and the following: (1) the number of aircraft based at the airport, other than those based on leased premises, the demand for transient aircraft fee parking, and the amount of space available for assigned-space aircraft parking at the airport; (2) the potential impact of assigned-space aircraft parking fees on airport users; and (3) the department's estimate of the cost to implement the requirements of 17 AAC 45.500 - 17 AAC 45.590 at the airport compared to the potential revenue the department would receive for assigned-space aircraft parking at the airport. (b) The department will inform the public that the commissioner has designated an airport for assigned-space aircraft parking by giving notice in accordance with 17 AAC 45.400. The notice will include (1) the name
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of Alaska Peninsula Corporation
    SPECIAL EDITIO VOLUME 2, ISSUE The Newsletter of Alaska Peninsula Corporation Inside This Issue Chairman’s Report 2 CEO Report 3 APC Federal Report 4 Corporate President Appointed 6 Coronavirus Now Here 7 APC Shareholder Distribution 10 Shareholder Spotlight 11 APC Summer Shareholder Employment 12 Job Opportunities 12 Chairman’s Report When we first sat down to write our submissions for this edition of the newsletter, we were preparing to “These are very announce some surprise developments uncertain times for within the corporation. Information to all. Through that, include a record year of production, shareholder job opportunities, the we are confident planning for a distribution, and that our effort to developing summer projects in villages. create a sustainable, Although the mood of this good news now seems clouded by the uncertainties strong corporation of the Coronavirus pandemic, the over the last few Corporation must continue to somehow years will prevail.” forge on. It’s a difficult reality to work through, however. Many of us whose parents or grandparents survived the pandemic of 1918, vividly recall the stories of entire villages wiped from the Trefon Angasan, Chairman face of the earth in just a few short of the Board weeks-time. Many children became orphaned, stories of the territorial system separating loved ones from one another, sometimes never seeing their family or homelands ever again. For many of us, COVID-19 resurrects those images of an apocalyptic world drawn forth by a rapid acting lethal virus. History repeats itself it seems. These are very uncertain times for all. Through that, we are confident that our effort to create a sustainable, strong corporation over the last few years will prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Election District Report
    Fiscal Year 1992 Election District Report Legislative Finance Division P.O. BoxWF Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3795 TABLE OF CONTENTS ELECTION DISTRICT PAGE NUMBER Summaries ........................................................... III - VI 01 Ketchikan - Wrangell - Petersburg. 1 02 Inside Passage . .. 7 03 Baranof - Chichagof. .. 11 04 Juneau. .. 15 05 Kenai - Cook Inlet . .. 21 06 Prince William Sound . .. 25 07 - 15 Anchorage .............................................................. 31 16 Matanuska - Susitna . .. 61 17 Interior Highways. .. 67 18 Southeast North Star Borough. .. 71 19 - 21 Fairbanks . .. 73 22 North Slope ~- Kotzebue ..................................................... 79 23 Norton Sound ........................................................... 83 24 Interior Rivers . 89 25 Lower Kuskokwim ......... ~.............................................. 93 26 Bristol Bay - Aleutian Islands . 97 27 Kodiak - East Alaska Peninsula ... .. 101 99 Statewide & Totals. .. 107 I II FY92 CAPITAL BUDGET /REAPPROPRIATIONS (CH 96, SLA 91) - AFTER VETOES ELECTION CAPITAL CAPITAL REAPPROP REAPPROP DISTRICT GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS TOTALS 1 21,750.1 35,266.3 0.0 0.0 35,266.3 2 8,223.8 15,195.6 0.0 0.0 15,195.6 3 3,524.8 6,446.1 0.0 0.0 6,446.1 4 8,397.2 19,387.0 1,360.0 1,360.0 20,747.0 5 11,885.0 16,083.9 0.0 0.0 16,083.9 6 5,315.0 14,371.1 0.0 0.0 14,371.1 7 - 15 73,022.9 99,167.9 -95.3 -95.3 99,072.6 16 13,383.0 66,817.2 -20.0 -20.0 66,797.2 17 6,968.5 39,775.5 0.0 0.0 39,775.5 18 2,103.6 2,753.6 0.0 0.0 2,753.6
    [Show full text]