DOCSLIB.ORG

Tcrp Report 75

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tcrp Report 75 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 75 Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration The Role of the Private-for-Hire Vehicle Industry in Public Transit TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2002 (Membership current as of January 2002) SELECTION COMMITTEE OFFICERS CHAIR LINDA S. WATSON Chair: John M. Samuels, Senior VP-Operations Planning & Support, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Corpus Christi RTA Norfolk, VA Vice Chair: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary of Transportation, Kansas DOT MEMBERS Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board DANNY ALVAREZ Miami-Dade Transit Agency MEMBERS KAREN ANTION Karen Antion Consulting WILLIAM D. ANKNER, Director, Rhode Island DOT GORDON AOYAGI THOMAS F. BARRY, JR., Secretary of Transportation, Florida DOT Montgomery County Government JACK E. BUFFINGTON, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural JEAN PAUL BAILLY Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas Union Internationale des Transports Publics SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC J. BARRY BARKER JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America Transit Authority of River City JAMES C. CODELL III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet LEE BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Barwood, Inc. ROBERT A. FROSCH, Sr. Research Fellow, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University RONALD L. BARNES GORMAN GILBERT, Director, Oklahoma Transportation Center, Oklahoma State University Central Ohio Transit Authority GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles GERALD L. BLAIR LESTER A. HOEL, L. A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Depart. of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia Indiana County Transit Authority H. THOMAS KORNEGAY, Exec. Dir., Port of Houston Authority ANDREW BONDS, JR. BRADLEY L. MALLORY, Secretary of Transportation, Pennsylvania DOT Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. MICHAEL D. MEYER, Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of JENNIFER L. DORN Technology FTA JEFF P. MORALES, Director of Transportation, California DOT CONSTANCE GARBER JEFFREY R. MORELAND, Exec. VP-Law and Chief of Staff, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., York County Community Action Corp. Fort Worth, TX FRED M. GILLIAM JOHN P. POORMAN, Staff Director, Capital District Transportation Committee, Albany, NY Chance Coach, Inc. CATHERINE L. ROSS, Executive Director, Georgia Regional Transportation Agency SHARON GREENE WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Senior VP, Gresham Smith & Partners, Alpharetta, GA Sharon Greene & Associates PAUL P. SKOUTELAS, CEO, Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA KATHERINE M. HUNTER-ZAWORSKI MICHAEL S. TOWNES, Exec. Dir., Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads, Hampton, VA Oregon State University MARTIN WACHS, Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley ROBERT H. IRWIN MICHAEL W. WICKHAM, Chairman and CEO, Roadway Express, Inc., Akron, OH British Columbia Transit JAMES A. WILDING, President and CEO, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority JOYCE HOBSON JOHNSON M. GORDON WOLMAN, Prof. of Geography and Environmental Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University North Carolina A&T State University CELIA G. KUPERSMITH EX OFFICIO MEMBERS Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association Transportation District BRUCE J. CARLTON, Acting Deputy Administrator, Maritime Administration, U.S.DOT PAUL J. LARROUSSE JOSEPH M. CLAPP, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator, U.S.DOT National Transit Institute SUSAN M. COUGHLIN, Director and COO, The American Trucking Associations Foundation, Inc. DAVID A. LEE JENNIFER L. DORN, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S.DOT Connecticut Transit ELLEN G. ENGLEMAN, Research and Special Programs Administrator, U.S.DOT STEPHANIE L. PINSON ROBERT B. FLOWERS (Lt. Gen., U.S. Army), Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. Engineers ROBERT H. PRINCE, JR. HAROLD K. FORSEN, Foreign Secretary, National Academy of Engineering Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority JANE F. GARVEY, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S.DOT RICHARD J. SIMONETTA THOMAS J. GROSS, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Transportation Technologies, U.S. DOE PB Consult EDWARD R. HAMBERGER, President and CEO, Association of American Railroads PAUL P. SKOUTELAS JOHN C. HORSLEY, Exec. Dir., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Port Authority of Allegheny County MICHAEL P. JACKSON, Deputy Secretary of Transportation, U.S.DOT PAUL A. TOLIVER JAMES M. LOY (Adm., U.S. Coast Guard), Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard King County Metro WILLIAM W. MILLAR, President, American Public Transportation Association AMY YORK MARGO T. OGE, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. EPA Amalgamated Transit Union MARY E. PETERS, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S.DOT VALENTIN J. RIVA, President and CEO, American Concrete Pavement Association EX OFFICIO MEMBERS JEFFREY W. RUNGE, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, U.S.DOT WILLIAM W. MILLAR JON A. RUTTER, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S.DOT APTA ASHISH K. SEN, Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S.DOT MARY E. PETERS ROBERT A. VENEZIA, Earth Sciences Applications Specialist, National Aeronautics and Space Administration FHWA JOHN C. HORSLEY TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM AASHTO ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR. Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP TRB JOHN M. SAMUELS, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, VA (Chair) E. DEAN CARLSON, Kansas DOT TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JENNIFER L. DORN, Federal Transit Administration, U.S.DOT LOUIS SANDERS LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia APTA WILLIAM W. MILLAR, American Public Transportation Association ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board SECRETARY PAUL P. SKOUTELAS, Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA ROBERT J. REILLY MICHAEL S. TOWNES, Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads, Hampton, VA TRB MARTIN WACHS, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 75 The Role of the Private-for-Hire Vehicle Industry in Public Transit GORMAN GILBERT Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK THOMAS J. COOK ANNA NALEVANKO Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE) North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC and LYNN EVERETT-LEE Multisystems, Inc. Dallas, TX SUBJECT AREAS Public Transit Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD — NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. — 2002 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 75 The nation’s growth and the need to meet mobility, Project B-16 FY’98 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISSN 1073-4872 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need ISBN 0-309-06722-7 of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, Library of Congress Control Number 2002101470 and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new © 2002 Transportation Research Board technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into Price $17.00 the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit Admin- istration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transportation NOTICE Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Cooperative for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after the Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Such Research Program, undertakes research and other technical activities approval reflects the Governing Board’s judgment that the project concerned is in response to the needs of transit service providers. The scope of appropriate with respect to both the purposes and resources of the National TCRP includes a variety of transit research fields including plan- Research Council. ning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human The members of the technical advisory panel selected to monitor this project and resources, maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. due consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The Proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as appropriate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vehicles for Hire Bylaws
    Chapter 280, VEHICLES FOR HIRE [HISTORY: Adopted by the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Falmouth 11-1-1990; amended in its entirety 2-13-2006. Subsequent amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Authority of Selectmen to enact taxicab regulations—See Ch. 65, Art. VI. Licenses and permits—See Ch. 140. ARTICLE I, General Provisions § 280-1. Definitions. The following words as used in these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires, shall have the following meanings: BASE -- The place of business licensed by the Town of Falmouth from which vehicles for hire shall be dispatched. CLEARED -- A taximeter is cleared when it is inoperative with respect to all fare indication, when no indication of fare or extras is shown and when all parts are in those positions in which they are designed to be when the vehicle on which the taximeter is installed is not engaged by a passenger. COLD TIRE PRESSURE -- The pressure of a tire when the tire is at ambient temperature. EXAMINER -- The Chief of Police of the Town of Falmouth or any person or persons so designated by the Chief of Police. EXTRAS -- Charges to be paid by a passenger in addition to the fare, including any charge at a flat rate for the transportation of passengers in excess of a stated number and any charge for the transportation of baggage. FACE -- That side of a taximeter upon which passenger charges are indicated. FARE -- That portion of the charge for the fare of a vehicle that is automatically calculated by a taximeter through the operation of the mileage or time mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday Through Friday Mt
    New printed schedules will not be issued if trips are adjusted Monday through Friday All trips accessible by five minutes or less. Please visit www.go-metro.com for the go smart... go METRO 24 most up-to-date schedule. 24 Mt. Lookout–Uptown–Anderson Riding Metro From Anderson / To Downtown From Downtown / To Anderson . 1 No food, beverages or smoking on Metro. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Offer front seats to older adults and people with disabilities. METRO* PLUS 3. All Metro buses are 100% accessible for people 38X with disabilities. 46 UNIVERSITY OF 4. Use headphones with all audio equipment 51 CINCINNATI GOODMAN DANA MEDICAL CENTER HIGHLAND including cell phones. Anderson Center Station P&R Salem Rd. & Beacon St. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Liberty St. & Sycamore St. Square Government Area B Square Government Area B Liberty St. & Sycamore St. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly Salem Rd. & Beacon St. Anderson Center Station P&R 11 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 43 5. Fold strollers and carts. BURNET MT. LOOKOUT AM AM 38X 4:38 4:49 4:57 5:05 5:11 5:20 5:29 5:35 5:40 — — — — 4:10 4:15 4:23 — 4:35 OBSERVATORY READING O’BRYONVILLE LINWOOD 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Guidelines
    GUIDANCE ON PREPARING WORKPLACES FOR COVID-19 TRANSPORTATION 1 The transportation and warehousing sector includes industries providing transportation of passengers and cargo, scenic and sightseeing transportation, and support activities related to modes of transportation. Wisconsin has more than 117,000 workers and 6,600 businesses in this sector, all working to keep the state’s economy moving. As many people stay safe at home, COVID-19 has significantly affected public transportation services such as ride sharing, taxi services, buses and air transportation. The nature of these services makes it difficult to practice social distancing. Trucking and rail industries have also been affected, but with a distinct difference between those that work in essential versus nonessential industries. Nonessential commercial transport is not allowed under the Safer at Home Order. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation is providing additional permits to truckers, adding rest areas, and relaxing weight and driver hour restrictions to aid the delivery of crucial food, medical supplies and other supplies during the pandemic. The guidelines contained in this document can help protect safety and maintain operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, please see the “General Guidance for All Businesses” document for guidance that applies to all industries and consult the other available industry guides as relevant for your specific business type. Recommendations for Transportation Employee health and hygiene Personal protective equipment (PPE) and cloth face coverings Employees who have a fever or other symptoms of COVID-19 should not be allowed to work. Develop a plan to have sufficient PPE on hand for both Emphasize effective hand hygiene, including washing routine operations and emergencies (for example, offering an hands for at least 20 seconds, especially before ill employee or customer a face mask until they can leave the preparing or eating food; after going to the bathroom; workplace).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service
    Transportation Research Record 1036 79 The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service UPALI VANDEBONA and ANTHONY J. RICHARDSON ABSTRACT It is known that different fare-collection strategies have different passenger boarding and alighting rates for street-based public transport services. In this pape r, various models of stop service times are reviewed, the available empirical observations of boarding and alighting rates are summarized, and the effects of different average boarding rates and coefficients of variation of boarding rates on the route performance of a tram (light rail transit) service are examined. The analysis is conducted using the TRAMS (Transit Route Anima­ tion and Modeling by Simulation) package. This modeling package is briefly described with particular attention to the passenger demand subroutine as well as the tram stop service times subroutine. As a result o f the analysis , it was found that slower boarding rates produce a slower and less reliable service along the route. The variability of boarding rates has no effect on route travel time but does contribute to greater unreliability in level of service. It is concluded that these level-of-service effects need to be considered when assessing the effect of changes in fare-collection strategies. Public transport operators and managers have found systems to proof-of-payment systems will generally themselves under increasing pressure in recent years bring about significant level-of-service improve­ because of conflicting expectations from different ments that should be considered in any analysis of groups in the community. On the one hand, public such fare collection strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Cost Metro Transportation for People with Disabilities
    REDUCED COST AND FREE METRO TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Individual Day Supports are tailored services and supports that are provided to a person or a small group of no more than two (2) people, in the community. This service lends very well to the use of public transportation and associated travel training, allowing for active learning while exploring the community and its resources. While the set rate includes funding for transportation, it is important to be resourceful when possible, using available discount programs to make your funds go further. METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY CENTER The Metro Transit Accessibility Center (202)962-2700 located at Metro headquarters, 600 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, offers the following services to people with disabilities: Information and application materials for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program for Metrobus and Metrorail Information and application materials for the MetroAccess paratransit service Consultations and functional assessments to determine eligibility for MetroAccess paratransit service Replacement ID cards for MetroAccess customers Support (by phone) for resetting your MetroAccess EZ-Pay or InstantAccess password The Transit Accessibility Center office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. weekdays, with the exception of Tuesdays with hours from 8 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. REDUCED FAIR PROGRAM Metro offers reduced fare for people with disabilities who require accessibility features to use public transportation and who have a valid Metro Disability ID. The Metro Disability ID card offers a discount of half the peak fare on Metrorail, and a reduced fare of for 90¢ cash, or 80¢ paying with a SmarTrip® card on regular Metrobus routes, and a discounted fare on other participating bus service providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Transportation Operating Procedures Manual.Pdf
    GROUND TRANSPORTATION OPERATING PROCEDURES (GTOPS) MANUAL August 22, 2017 GTOPS MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ITEM PAGE SECTION 1 Introduction 3 SECTION 2 Definitions and Acronyms 5 SECTION 3 General Requirements 12 SECTION 4 Taxicabs 21 . I – Contracted Taxicab Operators 21 . II – Non-Contracted Taxicab Operators 23 SECTION 5 Shared Ride Operators 26 . I – Contracted Taxicab Operators 26 . II – Non-Contracted Taxicab Operators 28 SECTION 6 Transportation Network Company 31 SECTION 7 Luxury Limousines 34 SECTION 8 Charter Buses 37 SECTION 9 Courtesy Vehicles 40 SECTION 10 Appendices Chart 42 . Authority Policy P310 43 SECTION 11 Exhibits 46 . #1 General Layout GT Facilities 46 . #2 Level 1, GT Facilities 47 . #3 Level 2, GT Facilities 48 . #4 Main Terminal Building GT Facilities, Level 1 49 . #5 Main Terminal Building GT Facilities, Level 2 50 . #6 GT Facilities Contracted Taxicab Circulation 51 . #7 GT Facilities Quad Lot Entrances from Level 2 52 . #8 GT Facilities Quad Lot Entrances from Terminal Parkway 53 . #9 GT Facilities Quad Lot Exits 54 2 GTOPS MANUAL SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION I. OVERVIEW As it relates to Commercial Vehicle operators, this Manual provides direction and lines of responsibility in the day-to-day ground transportation operation at Tampa International Airport. II. PURPOSE A. The Hillsborough County Aviation Authority (hereafter referred to as “Authority”) has established this Ground Transportation Operating Procedures (GTOPS) Manual as an adjunct to the Rules and Regulations for Tampa International Airport. This Manual is intended to: 1. Promote high-quality ground transportation services in a manner that is consistent with public safety and convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • PATCO New Automated Fare Collection System, Smart Card Or Magnetic- Your Choice
    PATCO New Automated Fare Collection System, Smart card or Magnetic- Your choice PATCO’s new fare collection system will feature the FREEDOM card, which will revolutionize how customers purchase their fares and travel on the PATCO system. The FREEDOM card is a smart card that will provide a high level of convenience and reliability to customers who use PATCO consistently. For customers who do not opt to use the FREEDOM card or who use PATCO infrequently, new magnetic tickets will be available. In PATCO’s current fare system, plastic tickets that use first generation magnetic technology are used. Although that technology was state of the art several decades ago, the technology is outdated and the tickets are prone to damage by devices commonly found in today’s environment. Unlike the current tickets, which are re-encoded numerous times for use after being captured by the fare gates, the new magnetic tickets will be paper tickets and will not be reused after capture. The new magnetic tickets can be purchased using either cash or coins. This means that customers choosing to purchase a ticket will not have to first stop at a change machine to convert their bills to coins. Both one- and two-ride tickets can be purchased from all new ticket vending machines located outside the fare gates. A customer wishing to purchase a magnetic ticket will simply select the prompt on the ticket vending machine screen for purchase of a ticket and then select the destination and whether a single ride or double ride ticket is desired. The ticket vending machine will list the price of the purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Fares on Transit Riding
    Effect of Fares on Transit Riding JOHN F. CURTIN, Partner, Simpson & Curtin, Philadelphia • FARES are perhaps the most sensitive aspect of transit service-balancing uneasily between political pressures and the need for operating revenue. Political campaigns in major American cities have been won and lost over transit fare issues, and there is substantial evidence that patrons react to fare increases at the turnstiles as well as at the polls. The correlation of price increase with loss of transit riding has been well established. Most utility commissions use a variation of the "shrinkage formula" devised by our firm more than 20 years ago when pressures of inflation first became manifest in fare increase proposals by transit companies. But the corollary questions of price differential among competing transit services, and the effect of joint fares in coordinated transit operations, have not been so well explored. What is the "sub-modal split" of riding between surface and rapid transit connecting two points, when the fare is 15 cents on one and 25 cents on the other? How much added traffic is attracted to rapid transit when the feeder bus fare is dropped from 20cents to 10 cents? When feeder and trunk lines are separate operations, how should the feeder line discount in the combination fare be shared between them? These are fundamental questions of revenue and cost apportionment in developing coordination between surface and rapid transit systems. Auto travel switches freely between systems-from county roads to city streets to state highways-without motor­ ists' awareness; division of motor fuel revenues among these systems is accomplished by legislative standards with varying degrees of sophistication.
    [Show full text]
  • Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: a Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data
    Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: A Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data by Hazem Marwan Zureiqat B.A. in Economics Macalester College, 2006 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2008 © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author ………………………………………………………………………… Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 16, 2008 Certified by ……………………………………………………………………...................... Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Director, Master of Science in Transportation Program Thesis Supervisor Accepted by …………………………………………………………………………………. Daniele Veneziano Chairman, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students 2 Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: A Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data by Hazem Marwan Zureiqat Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 16, 2008, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract In many large metropolitan areas, public transport is very heavily used, and ridership is approaching system capacity in the peak periods. This has caused a shift in attention by agency decision‐makers to strategies that can more effectively manage the demand for public transport, rather than simply increase overall demand. In other words, a need has arisen to understand not only why people use public transport as opposed to other modes but also how they use public transport, in terms of their ticket, mode, and time‐of‐day choices. To that end, fares become an increasingly important policy tool that can trigger certain behavioral changes among riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger and Vehicle Fare Information Surcharges Seattle/Bainbridge, Seattle/Bremerton, Edmonds/Kingston Fauntleroy/Vashon
    19-08-0392 Printed in the USA on recycled/recyclable paper. recycled/recyclable on USA the in Printed Seattle/Bainbridge, Seattle/Bremerton, Fauntleroy/Vashon, Point Defiance/Tahlequah, Americans with Disabilities Edmonds/Kingston Southworth/Vashon Mukilteo/Clinton Act (ADA) and Title VI Notice Seattle, Washington 98121-3014 Washington Seattle, 2901 Third Avenue Suite 500 Suite Avenue Third 2901 Passenger Regular Fare 8.65 Passenger Regular Fare 5.65 Passenger Regular Fare 5.20 It is the Washington State Department of Washington State Ferries State Washington In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 4.30 In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 2.80 In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 2.60 Transportation’s policy to ensure that no Youth Fare 4.30 Youth Fare 2.80 Youth Fare 2.60 person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 69.70 Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 45.70 Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 42.10 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or based on Monthly Ferry Pass 111.55 Monthly Ferry Pass 73.15 Monthly Ferry Pass 67.40 disability as provided by the Americans with Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Disabilities Act, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 12.35 Peak Season 16.00 Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 15.75 Peak Season 20.40 Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 7.40 Peak Season 9.70 discriminated against under any of its federally @WSFerries funded programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Vehicles for Hire
    CHAPTER 25 VEHICLES FOR HIRE1 Art. I. In General, §§ 25-1. -- 25-15. Art. II. Taxicabs, § 25-16 -- 25-53. Div. 1. Generally, §§ 25-16. -- 25-30. Div. 2. Business License, §§ 25-31. -- 25-45. Div. 3. Driver’s License, §§ 25-46. -- 25-53. ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Secs. 25-1. -- 25-15. Reserved. ARTICLE II. TAXICABS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 25-16. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: Motor Vehicle for Hire. The term “motor vehicle for hire” shall mean a motor vehicle not equipped with a taximeter designed to carry seven (7) or less persons for public hire at an hourly rate. Taxicab. The word “taxicab” shall mean a motor vehicle for transportation of seven (7) or less persons for hire upon a trip or mileage basis. (Code 1957, § 7.131) Cross reference - Definitions and rules of construction generally, §§ 1-2. Sec. 25-17. Lost Articles. Every taxicab driver, immediately after the termination of any hiring or employment, shall carefully search such taxicab for any property lost or left therein, and any such property unless sooner claimed or delivered to the owner shall be taken to the headquarters of the Police Department and deposited with the officer in charge within twenty-four (24) hours after the finding of such article. (Code 1957, § 7.147) 1 Cross reference – Traffic and motor vehicles, Ch. 22. 25-1 Detroit_906167_1 Sec. 25-18. Passengers. Every taxicab driver shall have the right to demand payment of the legal fare in advance, and may refuse employment until so prepaid, but no taxicab driver shall otherwise refuse or neglect to convey any orderly person upon request anywhere in the City unless previously engaged or unable to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Amounts and Court Costs
    FINE AMOUNTS AND COURT COSTS For conviction of offenses committed from September 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 Offense Code Offense Description Fine Court Costs Total 6006 ACCEPT TOBACCO BY MINOR 20.00 71.00 91.00 8050 ACTS CREATING UNLAWFUL NOISES 100.00 71.00 171.00 8124 AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION 100.00 71.00 171.00 8128 ALLOW ANIMAL TO GRAZE OR FEED ON PUBLIC LAND 100.00 71.00 171.00 8029 ALLOW ANIMAL TO RUN AT LARGE 100.00 71.00 171.00 3120A ALLOW PASSENGER WITHOUT APPROVED HEADGEAR 50.00 124.00 174.00 8144 ALLOW POULTRY TO RUN AT LARGE 150.00 71.00 221.00 8071 ALLOWING AN INDIVIDUAL TO CLING TO A MOTOR VEHICLE 60.00 71.00 131.00 8089 AMBULANCE ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS 250.00 71.00 321.00 8201 APPAREL TO BE WORN BY DRIVERS 200.00 71.00 271.00 1100 ASSAULT 200.00 71.00 271.00 1100A ASSAULT BY THREATS 200.00 71.00 271.00 3901 ATTEMPT TO PURCHASE ALCOHOL <21 (DEFERRED) 50.00 71.00 121.00 3801 ATTEMPT TO PURCHASE ALCOHOL BY MINOR 50.00 71.00 121.00 3316 BACKED UPON SHOULDER OR ROADWAY OF CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAY/ ILLEGAL BACKING 74.90 124.10 199.00 8032 BARKING OR HOWLING DOG 75.00 71.00 146.00 3507 BICYCLE/MOPED RIDER - FAIL TO USE DUE CARE- PASSING 25.00 124.00 149.00 3506 BICYCLE/MOPED TRAFFIC VIOLATION 25.00 124.00 149.00 8119 BUILDING CODE VIOLATION 250.00 71.00 321.00 8131 BURNING TRASH WITHOUT A PERMIT 200.00 71.00 271.00 8080 CAMPING ON BEACH 200.00 71.00 271.00 3509 CARRYING TOO MANY PASSENGERS ON BICYCLE/MOPED 25.00 124.00 149.00 3009 CHANGED LANE WHEN UNSAFE 74.90 124.10 199.00 3034B CHILD 8 - 16 NOT SECURED BY SAFETY BELT 100.00
    [Show full text]