DOCSLIB.ORG

190515Rep-N161710 LMS Draft Report V7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Draft Report Prepared by: GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd for City of Canada Bay Council on 15/05/19 Reference: N161710 Issue #: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Draft Report Client: City of Canada Bay Council on 15/05/19 Reference: N161710 Issue #: A-Dr Quality Record Issue Date Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By Signed Volker Buhl, Zara Abbasi, A-Dr 15/05/19 Draft Nick Buchanan Steve Enticott Okka Maw, John Devney © GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd) 2018 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property Melbourne | Sydney | Brisbane contained in this document remains the property of GTA Consultants. GTA Report Adelaide | Perth CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction and Background 2 1.2. Scope 2 1.3. Study Area 2 2. Policy Context 3 2.1. Policies and Strategic Context 4 2.2. Vision and Objectives 8 3. Land Use and Transport Context 10 3.1. Land Use 11 3.2. Population, Employment and Demographics 11 3.3. Travel Patterns and Demand 13 4. Existing Travel Networks 16 4.1. Active Transport Network 17 4.2. Public Transport Network 19 4.3. Road Network 26 4.4. Freight 31 4.5. Road Safety 32 4.6. Parking 36 5. Future Transport Network Changes 37 5.1. Committed and Planned Transport Projects 38 5.2. Future Issues and Opportunities 42 6. Future Demographic and Travel Pattern Changes 50 6.1. Future Population and Employment 51 6.2. Assessment of Travel Pattern Changes 54 6.3. Emerging Transport Trends 58 6.4. Implications 60 7. Actions 62 7.1. Overview 63 7.2. Active Transport 63 7.3. Public Transport 67 7.4. Road Network 72 7.5. Travel Demand Management 78 7.6. Land Use 80 N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay Figures Figure 1.1: Canada Bay Transport Network Overview 2 Figure 2.1: Map of Precincts within the Parramatta Road Corridor 6 Figure 3.1: Population and employment growth 11 Figure 3.2: Current Forecast Population Growth (2016 to 2036) 12 Figure 3.3: Current Forecast Employment Growth (2016 to 2036) 13 Figure 3.4: Mode Share for all trips in Canada Bay LGA 14 Figure 3.5: Percentage of Residential Location of local Workers, 2016 15 Figure 3.6: Trip Purpose for Canada Bay 15 Figure 4.1: Walking catchments for centres within the City of Canada Bay 18 Figure 4.2: Cycling catchment within City of Canada Bay 19 Figure 4.3: Bus network within City of Canada Bay LGA 20 Figure 4.4: AM Peak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 21 Figure 4.5: Interpeak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 22 Figure 4.6: PM Peak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 22 Figure 4.7: Peak Train Load for the T1 Line (estimate load factor at Redfern) 24 Figure 4.8: Bus and Rail Boarding 25 Figure 4.9: Bus and Rail Alighting 25 Figure 4.10: 30 Minute Public Transport Accessibility to Drummoyne 26 Figure 4.11: Road Hierarchy 27 Figure 4.12: 2016 AM 2 hour peak period road volumes 28 Figure 4.13: 2016 PM 2 hour peak period road volumes 29 Figure 4.14: 30 Minute Driving Accessibility to Rhodes 30 Figure 4.15: B-double routes within Canada Bay LGA 31 Figure 4.16: Rear loading and servicing for small businesses 32 Figure 4.17: Loading docks for larger shopping centres and supermarkets 32 Figure 4.19: Intersection Pedestrian Crash Density 34 Figure 4.20: Intersection Risk Rating 35 Figure 5.1: WestConnex 38 Figure 5.2: M4 East 39 Figure 5.3: Sydney Metro West Key Station Precincts 41 Figure 5.4: Parramatta Light Rail stage 1 and 2 41 Figure 5.5: Parramatta River Ferry Route: Proposed ferry wharf at Rhodes 42 Figure 5.6: Issues and opportunities for active transport (Walking and Cycling) 44 Figure 5.7: Issues and opportunities on public transport 46 Figure 5.8: Issues and opportunities on road networks 48 Figure 5.9: Issues and opportunities summary 49 Figure 6.1: Population departure from TZP16 (v1.3) 51 Figure 6.2: Distribution of population to 2036 52 Figure 6.3: Employment departure from TZP16 53 Figure 6.4: Distribution of employment growth to 2036 53 Figure 6.5: Existing travel modes (2016) 54 N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay Figure 6.6: Travel mode by trip purpose (2016) 54 Figure 6.7: Origin-destination pairs to other LGAs (2016) 55 Figure 6.8: Future travel modes (2026 Project Case) 56 Figure 6.9: Travel mode by trip purpose (2026 Project Case) 56 Figure 6.10: Future travel modes (2036 Project Case) 57 Figure 6.11: Travel mode by trip purpose (2036 Project Case) 57 Figure 6.12: Origin-destination pairs to other LGAs (2016-2036) 58 Figure 6.13: GTA Assessment tool for future trends 59 Figure 7.1: Process 63 Figure 7.2: Canada Bay strategic bicycle map 64 Figure 7.3: Active Transport Actions 65 Figure 7.4: Public Transport Actions 69 Figure 7.5: Movement and Place street type definitions 73 Figure 7.6: Movement and place methodology 74 Figure 7.7: Proposed Future Movement and Place for Canada Bay 74 Figure 7.8: Road Network Actions 75 Tables Table 2.1: Summary Results for Homebush, Burwood and Kings Bay Precincts 7 Table 4.1: Bus Frequencies at select locations 21 Table 4.2: Key State and Regional Roads 27 Table 4.3: 2016 Volume-capacity ratios throughout City of Canada Bay 30 Table 4.4: Summary of Crashes and Casualties from 2013 to 2017 33 Table 4.5: Trends of crashes and casualties from 2013 to 2017 34 Table 5.1: Future Key Transport Projects 38 Table 5.2: Issues and opportunities related to walking across Canada Bay LGA 43 Table 5.3: Issues and opportunities related to cycling across Canada Bay LGA 43 Table 5.4: Issues and opportunities related to the bus network & services across Canada Bay LGA 45 Table 5.5: Issues and opportunities related to the ferry network & services on Parramatta River 46 Table 5.6: Issues and opportunities related to the rail network & services across Canada Bay LGA 46 Table 5.7: Issues and opportunities related to the road network across Canada Bay LGA 47 Table 5.8: Issues and opportunities related to freight across Canada Bay LGA 47 Table 5.9: Issues and opportunities related to parking across Canada Bay LGA 48 Table 6.1: Preliminary Outcomes for Canada Bay (2036) 59 Table 6.2: Canada Bay Mode Share Targets (2026 and 2036) 61 N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay INTRODUCTION DRAFT 1. INTRODUCTION 01 N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 1 INTRODUCTION DRAFT 1.1. Introduction and Background GTA Consultants (GTA) has been commissioned by the City of Canada Bay Council (Council) to prepare a Local Movement Strategy and Action Plan (LMS). Recent amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) require Council to review and amend the Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan (LEP) as soon as practicable, to address the requirements in the Eastern City District Plan. Council is intending to amend the LEP within two years. The Act also requires Council to undertake the review in a strategic manner, by developing a Local Strategic Planning Statement that will set out the community’s 20-year vision for land-use in the local area (as also expressed in Council’s Community Strategic Plan) and how change will be managed into the future. 1.2. Scope This report provides an overview of the existing transport situation, relevant transport opportunities and constraints, future transport and land use trends and changes. It also presents a series of actions per travel mode that support overarching strategic objectives across the Canada Bay Local Government Area (LGA). 1.3. Study Area Figure 1.1 illustrates the study area for this report, which is the entire City of Canada Bay Council LGA. It includes major roads on the boundaries (such as Parramatta Road) and train stations such as Strathfield. Figure 1.1: Canada Bay Transport Network Overview N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 2 POLICY CONTEXT DRAFT 2. POLICY CONTEXT 02 N161710 // 15/05/19 Draft Report // Issue: A-Dr Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 3 POLICY CONTEXT DRAFT 2.1. Policies and Strategic Context Introduction This section of the report summarises the major planning policies and strategies that influence the development of a n LMS for the City of Canada Bay. A Metropolis of Three Cities -The Greater Sydney Region Plan A Metropolis of Three Cities -The Greater Sydney Region Plan is a State Government report that establishes a 40-year strategic land use plan for Sydney. The plan was developed concurrently with Future Transport Strategy 2056 prepared by Transport for NSW, which aims to deliver better connectivity and accessibility for the residents of Greater Sydney.
Recommended publications
  • Ordinary Meeting Meeting Held on 28/09/2020

    Ordinary Meeting Meeting Held on 28/09/2020

    Preface The NSW Government is committed to delivering a reformed infrastructure contributions system that achieves greater certainty, transparency, efficiency, and fairness in infrastructure funding and delivery in New South Wales. On 15 April 2020, I was appointed by the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces to undertake a comprehensive review of the infrastructure contributions system in New South Wales (the Review). This follows the Premier’s announcement in November 2019 that the Government would progress planning reforms to: 1. Cut red tape, increase transparency, reduce assessment timeframes and make e-planning mandatory for metro councils 2. Supercharge new hubs across New South Wales to ensure people can live in communities close to their work 3. Fix the uncertainty of developer contributions to boost investment, and 4. Preserve our heritage, create beautiful new public planes, and promote good design. As part of the Review’s Terms of Reference, I was tasked with reviewing and making recommendations to deliver an infrastructure contributions system that: ▪ delivers the public infrastructure required to support development in New South Wales ▪ achieves greater certainty, transparency, efficiency and fairness in the setting of infrastructure contributions ▪ identifies legislative regulatory changes necessary to implement the proposed reforms. During May and June 2020, I heard from some peak stakeholder groups and this helped me better understand the issues in the current infrastructure contributions system and shape the discussion in the Issues Paper. This Issues Paper is not NSW Government policy, but rather a broad summary of key issues with the existing system. It is designed to support community feedback on how we can best address these issues and ask questions that will inform broad reform directions.
  • Parramatta River

    Parramatta River

    anchorage anchorage ail far enough along the Parramatta River held at Homebush Bay in 2000, there has wetlands, vast stretches of open space, sailing Sand you can’t fail to notice a broken white been a dramatic rise in activity on the river. and rowing clubs, unit blocks and posh parramatta column mounted on a rock near the water’s On any given day, it bustles with yachts and waterfront mansions. Yaralla House, in Concord edge at Henley. powerboats, tinnies, canoes, kayaks and (pictured here) is one of the oldest and largest This simple monument is dedicated to the RiverCat ferries (seven low-wash catamarans and has considerable historical significance. short but spectacular life of Henry Searle, one of named after famous Australian sportswomen). There are four islands along the river: Australia’s greatest scullers, who died in 1889 at The river, which is tidal to Charles Street Rodd Island in Iron Cove, and Cockatoo, just 23. The column also marks the finish line Weir at Parramatta, is jam-packed with things to Spectacle and Snapper islands huddled between where, a year earlier, Searle comprehensively see – if you know what to look for. Woolwich and Birchgrove. In the late 19th defeated the world rowing champion. century, Rodd Island was used as a biological Searle’s Monument is one of the landmarks colonial History laboratory by a team from the Pasteur Institute along the Parramatta River, which officially As a key link between the settlements of Sydney in France, and also as a temporary quarantine merges with Sydney Harbour at Longnose Point, and Parramatta, the Parramatta River played an area for a pet dog that French actress Sarah Birchgrove and Manns Point, Greenwich.
  • North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan May 2018

    North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan May 2018

    North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan May 2018 V1.2 North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan Part 1 – Administration Authority The North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN) has been prepared by the North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Committee in compliance with the State Emergency & Rescue Management Act 1989. APPROVED <SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL STORED BY REMO> Mark Jones Regional Emergency Operations Controller North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Committee Chair Dated: 27 June 2018 ENDORSED Endorsed by the State Emergency Management Committee December 2018 Page 2 of 35 Printed 17/07/2019 7:34 AM North West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plan Document Control Any suggested amendments or additions to the contents of this plan should be forwarded in writing to: Region Emergency Management Officer North West Metropolitan Emergency Management Region North West Metropolitan Region Office Level 10, 2 Wentworth St, PARRAMATTA, NSW 2150 The North West Metropolitan Region Emergency Management Committee must endorse any changes to this document prior to inclusion. Any amendments or additions will be listed in the table below. Version Author Date Comment 0.1 Jamie Horsfield – 09/10/2017 Initial Draft REMO 0.2 Jamie Horsfield – 11/12/2017 Changes after initial comments. REMO 0.3 Jamie Horsfield – 11/04/2018 Minor Ammendments post official REMO consultation 1.0 Jamie Horsfield – 14/05/2018 Approved Version by REMC REMO 1.1 Jamie Horsfield – 30/07/2018 Minor ammendments post comments from REMO FRNSW and NSW SES SEMC Representatives. 1.1 6/12/2018 ENDORSED BY SEMC 1.2 Jamie Horsfield – 18/2/2019 Updates post boundary changes.

  • City of Canada Bay Plan of Management for Wangal

    CITY OF CANADA BAY PLAN OF MANAGEMENT FOR WANGAL RESERVE & PUNT PARK Adopted 14 November 2017 In association with City of Canada Bay Plan of Management Wangal Reserve & Punt Park TABLE OF CONTENTS Section One: Study Background .................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 STUDY AIMS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 STUDY APPROACH ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 ABOUT WANGAL RESERVE ............................................................................................................... 4 1.5 DESCRIPTION OF LAND ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 PLANNING CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................ 11 1.3 LOCAL LAND USE PLANNING .......................................................................................................... 12 1.4 NATIVE TITLE ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Section Two: Research & Consultation Findings ..................... 14 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................
  • Camellia Precinct Transport and Traffic Assessment

    Camellia Precinct Transport and Traffic Assessment

    NSW DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND JANUARY 2018 ENVIRONMENT Camellia Precinct Transport and Traffic Assessment TABLE OF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................. V CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2 LOCAL AND STRATEGIC CONTEXT ............................... 4 3 PLANED AND COMMITTED PROJECTS ....................... 19 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................... 26 5 CAMELLIA PRECINCT REVITALISATION ..................... 45 6 TRANSPORT VISION ........................................................ 49 7 PROPOSED TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS ........................ 59 8 TRANSPORT NETWORK ASSESSMENT OF ADEQUACY ........................................................................ 76 9 TRANSPORT MEASURES ............................................... 83 10 NEXT STEPS ....................................................................... 88 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Development Control Plan (DCP) parking rates .......................... 16 Table 2.2 The Olympic Peninsula development and completion ................. 18 Table 4.1 Existing mode share for Camellia and adjoining residential area ............................................................................ 26 Table 4.2 Travel direction to/from Camellia and surrounding areas ............ 28 Table 4.3 Weekday train services at Camellia Station ................................. 31 Table 4.5 Summary of existing intersection performance ...........................
  • Parramatta Bike Plan Volume 3: Detailed Route Descriptions

    Parramatta Bike Plan Volume 3: Detailed Route Descriptions

    PARRAMATTA BIKE PLAN VOLUME 3: DETAILED ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS CITY OF PARRAMATTA // MAY 2017 Toongabbie to CBD via Westmead and Wentworthville This route runs along Wentworth Ave; Bridge Rd; Alexandra Ave; and Park Parade (shared path, south) from Toongabbie to Parramatta CBD. It offers a direct, legible route along streets which can accommodate safe, attractive cycling infrastructure. It offers connections to other regional routes to Northmead and through Westmead (including Parramatta CBD via Westmead hospital precinct) and numerous connections to local routes. Street Description Current Proposed infrastructure Justification infrastructure Wentworth Wentworth Avenue is a one Wentworth Avenue A bi-directional separated bike lane Wentworth Avenue provides the most Avenue lane each direction street currently lacks running on the southern side of direct path to Westmead and onto running along the bicycle Wentworth Avenue from Toongabbie Parramatta CBD, it is reasonably quiet eastern/northern edge of the infrastructure. Railway Station to Bridge Road, and of sufficient width for a bike lane. Blacktown railway line. Its Westmead (target width is 3m, no The intersections require reconfiguration width is generally sufficient narrower than 2.4m). At railway due to current safety risks. for bike lanes, although stations, due to limited space, shared additional treatments will be paths may be required. required in some Interim actions until bi-directional bike intersections. lane is installed: removal of Audio Tactile Extrusions from the intersection with Bungaree Road; remarking of the intersection with Goodall Street, to accommodate bike lanes; realignment of turning lanes at the intersection with Binalong Road, which currently pose a danger to cyclists. The intersection with Hart Drive requires an upgraded crossing point, including bike lanterns and a more legible connection through improved signage and surface markings.
  • Patricia Palmer Lee PRG 1722 Special List POSTCARDS INDEX

    Patricia Palmer Lee PRG 1722 Special List POSTCARDS INDEX

    ___________________________________________________________ ______________________ Patricia Palmer Lee PRG 1722 Special List POSTCARDS INDEX 1993 to 2014 NO. DATE SUBJECT POSTMARK STAMPS A1 05.07.1993 Ramsgate Beach, Botany Bay Sydney Parma Wallaby A2 09.07.1993 Bondi Beach Surf Eastern Suburbs Ghost Bat A3 13.07.1993 Autumn Foliage, Blue Mountains Eastern Suburbs Tasmanian Herit Train A4 20.07.1993 Baha'i Temple, Ingleside Eastern Suburbs Silver City Comet A5 27.07.1993 Harbour Bridge from McMahon's Point Eastern Suburbs Kuranda Tourist Train A6 04.08.1993 Winter Sunset, Cooks River, Tempe Eastern Suburbs Long-tailed Dunnart A7 10.08.1993 Henry Lawson Memorial, Domain Eastern Suburbs Little Pygmy-Possum A8 17.08.1993 Berry Island, Parramatta River Rushcutters Bay Ghost Bat A9 24.08.1993 Story Bridge, Brisbane River Eastern Suburbs Parma Wallaby A10 28.08.1993 Stradbroke Island, Moreton Bay Qld Cootamundra Long-tailed Dunnart A11 31.08.1993 Rainforest, Brisbane Botanical Gardens Yass Little Pygmy-Possum A12 05.09.1993 Dinosaur Exhibit, Brisbane Museum Eastern Suburbs Ghost Bat A13 10.09.1993 Wattle Festival Time, Cootamundra Eastern Suburbs Squirrel Glider A14 14.09.1993 Davidson Nat Park, Middle Harbour Eastern Suburbs Dusky Hopping-Mouse A15 17.09.1993 Cooma Cottage, Yass Eastern Suburbs Parma Wallaby A16 21.09.1993 Bicentennial Park, Homebush Bay Eastern Suburbs The Ghan A17 24.09.1993 Rainbow, North Coast NSW Eastern Suburbs Long-Tailed Dunnart A18 28.09.1993 Sphinx Monument, Kuring-gai Chase NP Canberra Little Pygmy-Possum A19 01.10.1993
  • PUTNEY PARK Plan of Management

    PUTNEY PARK Plan of Management

    PUTNEY PARK Plan of Management Adopted 11 October 2011 DOCUMENT CONTROL ISSUE NAME ISSUE DATE PURPOSE Internal Review January 2011 Internal Review and NSW Land and Property Management Authority Review Public Exhibition May 2011 For public exhibition For Adoption September 2011 Presented to Council for adoption with all changes highlighted ADOPTED 11 October 2011 Adopted at the Council Meeting, 11 October 2011 PUTNEY PARK Plan of Management Putney Park will provide passive recreation opportunities within a natural landscape setting. Through the provision of playgrounds, walking trails and parklands facilities, Putney Park will be a place where the Ryde Community and visitors to Ryde can enjoy cultural and recreation activities in a safe and accessible environment. The Park will cater for diverse recreation and leisure needs of the community while preserving the interrelationship between the Parramatta River foreshore and the parklands. Prepared By Prepared By: City of Ryde Open Space, Community Life 1 Devlin Street RYDE NSW 2112 tel: (02) 9952 8222 fax: (02) 9952 8070 Email: [email protected] www.ryde.nsw.gov.au This page has been intentionally left blank PUTNEY PARK PLAN OF MANAGEMENT City of Ryde Executive Summary Background Putney Park is a regional park and a highly valued area of foreshore open space located in Putney. The Park is a combination of Crown Land, managed under the Crown Lands Act 1989 and Community Land, managed under the Local Government Act 1993. It is zoned specifically for open space / recreation in the Ryde Planning Scheme Ordinance. Adjoing the boundary of Putney Park is the Mortlake Punt Ferry that is a vehicular ferry connecting Putney and Mortlake across the Parramatta River.
  • 3Rd Rose Bay Judean Scouts

    3Rd Rose Bay Judean Scouts

    3RD ROSE BAY JUDEAN SCOUTS ................................................................................................... 3251 ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE ...................................................... 3286 ARMIDALE RURAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL ................................................................................... 3267 ASSENT TO BILLS ............................................................................................................................... 3286 AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT ....................................................................................................... 3240 AUSTRALIAN-KOREAN POLITICAL AND BUSINESS LEADERS FORUM ................................ 3276 BANKSTOWN CITY COUNCIL PROPOSED AMALGAMATION .................................................. 3265 BAYS PRECINCT URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM ............................................................... 3263, 3298 BAYS PRECINCT URBAN REVNEWAL PROGRAM ...................................................................... 3296 BONNYRIGG MEN'S SHED ................................................................................................................ 3274 BURRINJUCK ELECTORATE ............................................................................................................ 3241 BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE ................................................................................................................ 3276 CENTRAL COAST EXPRESS ADVOCATE EDITOR ......................................................................
  • What Price Value Capture?

    What Price Value Capture?

    What price value capture? Grattan Institute Support Grattan Institute Report No. 2017-05, March 2017 Founding members Affiliate Partners This report was written by Marion Terrill, Grattan Institute Transport Google Program Director, and Owain Emslie, Associate. Hugh Batrouney, Medibank Private Lucille Danks and Paul Austin made substantial contributions to the report. Susan McKinnon Foundation We would like to thank numerous industry participants and officials for their helpful comments and input. Senior Affiliates The opinions in the report are those of the authors and do not EY necessarily represent the views of Grattan Institute’s founding Maddocks members, affiliates, individual board members reference group PwC members or reviewers. Any remaining errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. McKinsey & Company The Scanlon Foundation Grattan Institute is an independent think-tank focused on Australian public policy. Our work is independent, practical and rigorous. We aim Wesfarmers to improve policy outcomes by engaging with both decision-makers and the community. Affiliates For further information on the Institute’s programs, or to join our mailing Ashurst list, please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/ Corrs This report may be cited as: Terrill, M. and Emslie, O. (2017). What price value capture?. Grattan Institute. Deloitte ISBN: 978-0-9876121-2-0 GE ANZ All material published or otherwise created by Grattan Institute is licensed under a The Myer Foundation Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Urbis Westpac Grattan Institute 2017 2 What price value capture? Overview Construction of Hong Kong’s metro railway was funded solely from is very hard to apply to projects such as roads and hospitals where the sale of development rights around stations.
  • SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK Review of Master Plan 2030 and State Significant Precinct Planning Report

    SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK Review of Master Plan 2030 and State Significant Precinct Planning Report

    SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK Review of Master Plan 2030 and State Significant Precinct Planning Report August 2016 Page ii ▪ Sydney Olympic Park Planning Report To view an electronic version in PDF format, visit www.planning.nsw.gov.au © Crown Copyright 2016 Department of Planning & Environment Printed August 2016 Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has bee1n made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Copyright Notice In keeping with the Department of Planning & Environment’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in this Planning Report for personal, in‐house or non‐commercial use without formal permission or charge. All other rights are reserved. If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit material appearing in this Planning Report for any other purpose, a request for formal permission should be directed to: Department of Planning & Environment GPO Box 39 Sydney NSW 2001 You are required to acknowledge that the material is provided by the Department or the owner of the copyright as indicated in this Planning Report and to include this copyright notice and disclaimer in any copy. You are also required to acknowledge the author (the Department of Planning and Environment) of the material as indicated in this Planning Report Sydney Olympic Park Planning Report ▪ Page iii Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................
  • Kendall Bay Sediment Remediation Project: Community Information and Feedback Session

    Kendall Bay Sediment Remediation Project: Community Information and Feedback Session

    Kendall Bay Sediment Remediation Project: Community Information and Feedback Session Summary of Outcomes Report Summary of Outcomes Report 29 July 2014 URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE: Director Susan Rudland Senior Consultant Col Mackin Graduate Consultant Elizabeth Robertson Job Code SPP20813 Report Number Outcomes report Urbis’s Public Policy team has received ISO 20252 Certification for the provision of public policy research and evaluation, social planning, community consultation, market research and communications research © Urbis Pty Ltd ABN 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. You must read the important disclaimer appearing within the body of this report. URBIS Australia Asia Middle East urbis.com.au TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Overview of the process ................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Community Information and Feedback Session (CIFS) .................................................................... 3 3 Summary of Feedback .................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Participation ....................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Feedback received ...........................................................................................................................