DOCSLIB.ORG

Pedestrian Bridge Instructions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pedestrian Bridge Instructions Pedestrian Bridge Instructions The following instructions are for standard Pedestrian Bridges. We attempt to cover different methods and parts lists based on the most common bridge configurations. Custom Bridges, with additional Beams will have different parts lists, but the methods of assembly remain the same. Section 1 - Components The Chart below will help you identify the components and the quantity of each. Note that if you have purchased a bridge with a beam wrap, the number of beams and cross braces are the same but the cross braces are different, so assembly is slightly different as well Number of decking boards are based on the length of the Bridge. The Number of Beams and Cross Brace are dependent on the Width (and decking material). See the charts below for the number of components for your bridge. Also in this chart are the number of Posts and railing sections (The Type of Railing you have selected will have no bearing on the number of components since the sections are pre- assembled). There are two numbers in the cross braces section. There are more cross braces when an extra beam is added because of composite decking – the first number is wood decking, and the second is for composite. Number of Decking Number of Cross Braces Boards and Posts Width > 3’ 4’ 5’ 6’ Length Decking Posts Length v Wood/Comp Wood/Comp Wood/Comp Wood/Comp 6’ 15 8 6’ 1 / 2 2 / 3 3 / 4 4 / 5 8’ 20 8 8’ 2 / 4 4 / 6 6 / 8 8 / 10 10’ 25 8 10’ 3 / 6 6 / 9 9 / 12 12 / 15 12’ 29 10 12’ 4 / 8 8 / 12 12 / 16 16 / 20 14’ 34 10 14’ 4 / 8 8 / 12 12 / 16 16 / 20 16’ 38 10 16’ 5 / 10 10 / 15 15 / 20 20 / 25 18’ 43 12 18’ 5 / 10 10 / 15 15 / 20 20 / 25 20’ 47 12 20’ 5 / 10 10 / 15 15 / 20 20 / 25 Number Of Beams Number of Railing Sections Railing Railing Width Wood Decking Composite Decking Length sections Length sections 3’ 2 3 6’ 6 14’ 8 4’ 3 4 8’ 6 16’ 8 5’ 4 5 10’ 6 18’ 10 6’ 5 6 12’ 8 20’ 10 Other Components: Each Bridge – no matter the size, has two 2x4 End Caps and a Hardware Package Section 2 - Ground Preparation Each side of the Beams should set on a flat surface. Each end of the bridge should also be level with the other end of the bridge. Each side of the bridge should be in contact with at least 8” of solid surface. If you are using the bridge for light duty, you could set the beams on level flat ground. To avoid the beams sinking in soft ground, each beam should be supported by patio blocks, bricks, or pressure treated lumber. Each of our bridges are capable of supporting thousands of pounds, but the base that it sets on must also be able to support the weight of the bridge and the traffic that goes across it. For maximum weight capacity a concrete footer or foundation can be poured. The footer should be wide enough so that at least 8” of each beam seat is supported. All the beams need to set on the foundation. If you intend to have a step up onto the bridge, the foundation can be at ground level. For a smooth transition from the ground, path or walkway on to the bridge, you will need to set the footers below grade. Section 3 - Dimension and other Info: This applies to all pedestrian trail bridges, all railing styles, and both wood and maintenance free bridges. Width of bridge has no bearing on these dimensions. A LENGTH (Total (ARCH S (Seat X - end to hip Y Z (Top flat OF BRIDGE Length) camber) cut) (horizontal) (Up slope) section) 6 72 4 12 24 25 24 8 96 4 16 32 33 32 10 120 4 16 32 33 56 12 144 4 16 32 33 80 14 168 4 16 32 33 104 16 192 4 16 32 33 128 All Lengths: B - Height of Beam = 11.25” E - End Cuts = 3 3/4” NOTE: Named bridge length is the length of the beam. Overall length will include the two end boards. Installation Section 4 - Beam, Cross Braces and Decking Board Assembly NOTE: If the area is over an area that might be dangerous, you may want to assemble the beams and cross braces on a level surface and then move to the area. You need to determine this based on the area, and your abilities. Do not assemble the bridge completely and then attempt to move, unless you have a plan, equipment or manpower to move it, since it would be quite heavy. Step 1 - Set the beams in the general area where they will rest. The first step is to create a “box” using the outside beams and end cap boards as shown below. Step 2 - Determine which beams are for the outsides. Most wood bridges, the beams are interchangeable. If you ordered a flat beam, or on some custom bridges, there will be markings from where the posts will go. Make sure the markings are to the outside of the box. If your bridge has a beam wrap, the wrapped side will face out. The end boards are about 3 ½” tall and the width of the bridge (a 4’ wide bridge will have end caps that are 48” long). Be sure that the end boards are flush with the bottom of the beams, and with the outside. If your bridge has a beam wrap, the end board will be flush with the outside of the beam wrap (see insert). The width of the bridge includes the beam wrap. Step 3 - Attach end cap boards with 2 ½” screws. Step 4 - You will next set the interior beams (if any). The number of interior beams can be found using the chart on page one. If you have a composite decking there is an additional beam added for strength. You may have also added extra beams as well. Set the interior beams inside the box, and set so they are aligned with the pilot holes drilled in the end cap boards. DO NOT attach at this time. You will first need to install the cross braces first. The images at the right show the proper placement of interior beams (DO not attach the beams(s) to the end board at this time.) Cross Braces can be one of two types. If your bridge is wood, or there is no beam wrap, the braces will be short pieces of 2x6 Treated Pine. Step 5a - The cross braces should be offset so that you can easily attach by screwing through the beams and into the cross braces. Make sure the tops of the cross braces are flush with the top of the beam along the center flat areas. On the angled ends of the beams, move the braces down so that they are not above the beam. (Using Two 2 1/2” screws on each end of the cross braces – The beams will not be marked, and no pilot holes). You need to put one brace at near the center and about 24” for each end. Evenly space the others (See image below left) Step 5b - If you have a beam wrap, some of the braces will be T shaped. Since you do not want to screw through the beam wrap, the top of the T will be against the outside beams and will attach using Four 2 1/2” screws from the through the Brace and into inside of the beams. (Do Not over tighten or counter sink the screws). Interior cross braces that do not touch the outside beams will be 2x6’s with no T piece. Attach these with 2 1/2” screws through the beams and into the ends of the braces. (below, right) Step 5c for bridges that have all double beams the cross braces will be H shaped attach both sides like below right photo (showing a T brace) Step 6 - Once installing the cross beams is complete, screw through the end cap boards into the ends of the beams. Be sure that the bottoms of the beams are flush with the bottom of the end cap. Attach with two 2 1/2” screws per beam end. Decking boards are either 2x6 Wood boards or composite boards. Assembly is the same for any of the decking options. The length of the decking boards is the same as the named width of the bridge. Step 7 - Position and attach four boards that will align with the point where the flat top part of the beams and the sloped side as shown below. Attach with 2 ½” screws (If you have selected a composite deck, these Weathermatch screws closely match the color of the decking ). Step 8 - Only the ends of the boards have predrilled pilot holes. Attach to the interior beams with two screws over the center of the interior beams. Step 9 - Position boards along the top flat part of the bridge. Because of slight variations of the width of the wooden boards, you should not use a set dimension to try to space the boards. Before attaching any of the boards, position them so that they are spaced equally… They may even be touching with no gaps between them (This is normal for wooden decking since the boards will shrink over time, and create the gap.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visit Ohio's Historic Bridges
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION Visit Ohio’s Historic Bridges Historic and unique bridges have a way of sticking in our collective memories. Many of us remember the bridge we crossed walking to school, a landmark on the way to visit relatives, the gateway out of town or a welcoming indication that you are back in familiar territory. The Ohio Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ohio Historic Bridge Association, Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office, TourismOhio and historicbridges.org, has assembled a list of stunning bridges across the state that are well worth a journey. Ohio has over 500 National Register-listed and historic bridges, including over 150 wooden covered bridges. The following map features iron, steel and concrete struc- tures, and even a stone bridge built when canals were still helping to grow Ohio’s economy. Some were built for transporting grain to market. Other bridges were specifically designed to blend into the scenic landscape of a state or municipal park. Many of these featured bridges are Ohio Historic Bridge Award recipients. The annual award is given to bridge owners and engineers that rehabilitate, preserve or reuse historic structures. The awards are sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration, ODOT and Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office. Anthony Wayne Bridge - Toledo, OH Ohio Department of Transportation SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION 2 17 18 SOUTHEAST REGION in eastern Ohio, Columbiana County has Metropark’s Huntington Reservation on the community. A project that will rehabilitate several rehabilitated 1880’s through truss shore of Lake Erie along US 6/Park Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Arched Bridges Lily Beyer University of New Hampshire - Main Campus
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2012 Arched Bridges Lily Beyer University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Beyer, Lily, "Arched Bridges" (2012). Honors Theses and Capstones. 33. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/33 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CIVIL ENGINEERING Arched Bridges History and Analysis Lily Beyer 5/4/2012 An exploration of arched bridges design, construction, and analysis through history; with a case study of the Chesterfield Brattleboro Bridge. UNH Civil Engineering Arched Bridges Lily Beyer Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I: History
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number G, H page 156 V E H I C U L A R B R I D G E S I N A R I Z O N A Geographic Data: State of Arizona Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods The Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory, which forms the basis for this Multiple Property Documentation Form [MPDF], is a sequel to an earlier study completed in 1987. The original study employed 1945 as a cut-off date. This study inventories and evaluates all of the pre-1964 vehicular bridges and grade separations currently maintained in ADOT’s Structure Inventory and Appraisal [SI&A] listing. It includes all structures of all struc- tural types in current use on the state, county and city road systems. Additionally it includes bridges on selected federal lands (e.g., National Forests, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) that have been included in the SI&A list. Generally not included are railroad bridges other than highway underpasses; structures maintained by federal agencies (e.g., National Park Service) other than those included in the SI&A; structures in private ownership; and structures that have been dismantled or permanently closed to vehicular traffic. There are exceptions to this, however, and several abandoned and/or privately owned structures of particular impor- tance have been included at the discretion of the consultant. The bridges included in this Inventory have not been evaluated as parts of larger road structures or historic highway districts, although they are clearly integral parts of larger highway resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Behaviour of Cable-Stayed Bridges
    Structural Behaviour of Cable-stayed Bridges by Elizabeth Davalos Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering and Administration Universidad Panamericana sede Guadalajara, Mexico June 1998 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING ENG IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY At the A3 0 2000 LIBRARIES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2000 @2000 Elizabeth Davalos. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicity paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of the Author Ddpa ment of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 5, 2000 Certified by Professor Jerome J. Connor 6epartment of ivil and Environmental Engineering 7 Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Daniele Veneziano Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies Structural Behaviour of Cable-stayed Bridges by Elizabeth Davalos Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 5, 2000 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Abstract Cable-stayed bridges have emerged as the dominant structural system for long span bridge crossings during the past thirty years. That success is due to a combination of technical advancements and pleasing aesthetics attributes. The interaction of the various structural components results in an efficient structure which is continuously evolving and providing new methods to increase span lengths. The objective of this thesis is to describe in detail the basic structural behaviour of each of the components of cable-stayed bridges, and to present the analysis of a specific cable-stayed bridge which was proposed for the Charles River Crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Suspension Bridge
    structures STS19 Simple Suspension Bridge Experiment for the study of the characteristics of a simple suspension bridge. Mounts on the Structures platform and connects to the Structures automatic data acquisition unit and software (VDAS® Onboard). Shown fitted to the Structures platform (STS1, available separately) Laptop not included Key Features • One of a range of experiment modules that teach structures principles • Fits to the Structures platform for ergonomic use and space-saving storage • Includes multiple loads for many combinations of loads including uniformly distributed loads (UDLs) • A simplifi ed version of a realistic structure to give students an understanding of real-life structures • Direct measurement of cable tension for simple and quick experiments • Supplied with a storage tray to keep smaller items safe • Works with user-friendly software (VDAS®) TecQuipment Ltd, Bonsall Street, long eaton, Nottingham NG10 2AN, UK tecquipment.com +44 115 972 2611 [email protected] REF 0920 Page 1 of 3 STS19 Simple Suspension Bridge Description Learning outcomes One of a range of experiment modules that fi t to the • How bridge load aff ects the tension in a suspension Structures platform (STS1, available separately), this cable product helps students to understand how loads aff ect • Comparing a central point load with a UDL tension in the suspension cable supporting the ‘deck’ of a suspension bridge. Students add loads to the deck held by • Exploring the ratio of bridge ‘deck’ mass and a moving the suspension cable between two supports. A load cell in load the left-hand support measures the cable tension. • Comparing simple parabola-based theory with a more Students apply loads, which change the cable tension.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Transportation Bridge Inventory 2015 Annual Report
    Florida Department of Transportation Bridge Inventory 2015 Annual Report August 2015 Office of Maintenance John D. Clark P.E. Bridge Inventory - 2015 Annual Report Table of Contents Page Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 Number of Bridges..................................................................................................... 1 Age of Bridges........................................................................................................... 6 Types of Bridge Superstructures............................................................................... 14 Deck Area of the Bridge Inventory............................................................................. 21 Overall Structural Condition...................................................................................... 30 Structurally Deficient Bridges.................................................................................... 39 Posted and Closed Bridges....................................................................................... 43 Functionally Obsolete Bridges................................................................................... 50 Bridge Replacement Cost......................................................................................... 54 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 65 List of Tables Page Table 1 Bridge Inventory By Decade Built Statewide
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/PBIC Whitepaper Bridges.Pdf (Accessed on 27 July 2019)
    land Article The Role and Importance of a Footbridge Suspended over a Highway in the Opinion of Its Users—Trabzon (Turkey) Maria Hełdak 1,* , Sultan Sevinc Kurt Konakoglu 2 , Banu Cicek Kurdoglu 3 , Hande Goksal 3, Bogdan Przybyła 4 and Jan K. Kazak 1 1 Institute of Spatial Management, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, Amasya University, 05100 Amasya, Turkey; [email protected] 3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey; [email protected] (B.C.K.); [email protected] (H.G.) 4 Department of Mechanics of Structers and Urban Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In the urban landscape, footbridges appeared along with the development of urbanization through the implementation of more complex spatial structures. The introduction of transport transit to cities or sometimes urban gravity towards the important communication routes imposed their construction in order to ensure pedestrians’ safety and smooth flow of traffic. The aim of the study is to determine how an overpass in the city of Trabzon is used by people of different ages, the security and motivation problem, the possibility of a footbridge, and how an overpass is perceived as a Citation: Hełdak, M.; Kurt crossing over a highway. The study addresses the problem of safety and motivation related to the Konakoglu, S.S.; Kurdoglu, B.C.; use of an overpass by people of different ages and is focused on the perception of an overpass as a Goksal, H.; Przybyła, B.; Kazak, J.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel: I-64 Under James River (#10)
    Tunnels Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel: I-64 under James River (#10) Hampton Roads District Age of Original Structures: 60 Years Age of Parallel Structures: 44 Years Approach Bridge Conditions: 3 are Fair and one is Poor Tunnel Condition: Fair ADT = 43,000 Detour: 47 Miles Replacement Required for Approach Bridges Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel – General Information The Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel (HRBT) facility is a 3.5‐mile‐long combination bridge‐tunnel crossing Hampton Roads carrying Interstate 64 in the southeastern portion of Virginia. The HRBT connects the independent cities of Hampton on the Virginia Peninsula and Norfolk in South Hampton Roads. It is a four‐lane bridge‐tunnel composed of 1.8 miles of trestles, two manmade portal islands, and two tunnels under the Hampton Roads Harbor. The westbound and eastbound roadways each consist of two lanes of traffic. The original HRBT (WB) was opened to bi‐directional traffic in 1957 and connected Route 60 (now I‐64) in Hampton with Route 60 in Norfolk as a toll facility. In 1976, the second HRBT (EB) was opened to eastbound traffic. With construction of the second tunnel, tolls were removed and the original 1957 tunnel now carries Westbound I‐64 traffic from Norfolk to Hampton. Built by the immersed tube method, the tunnel was constructed of 300+/‐ foot long prefabricated tubes that were placed by lay‐barges and joined together in a trench dredged in the bottom of the harbor, and backfilled with earth. The Eastbound Tunnel consists of 21 prefabricated tubes. The Eastbound and Westbound Tunnels are separate structures, each of carries a two‐lane highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Tips a Closer Look at Small Cable Suspension Trail Bridges Before 1960, Bridge Design Was Done by May Be Approximated As a Uniform Load
    BridgeLine December 2006 Bridge Tips A Closer Look at Small Cable Suspension Trail Bridges Before 1960, bridge design was done by may be approximated as a uniform load. This hand using slide rules and simple methods makes calculations simple and is usually whenever possible. Small suspension bridges close enough for small cable bridges. The were no exception. Fortunately, there are horizontal cable force component is H=wL2/ some simple, time-proven methods and (8d), where w is the dead and live load weight guidelines that are still valid today for small per foot, L is the span length and d is the cable suspension trail bridges. sag in the cable. For the Rattlesnake Creek Bridge, H=0.475(90.0)2/((8)(9.0))=53.4 kips. Bridge geometry should be considered first. The vertical force component is V=(wL)/2, or Cable sag should be 8 to 12 percent of the V=0.475(90.0)/2=21.4 kips. The maximum span length. Deck camber is for aesthetics tension force, T=(H2+V2)1/2 along the axis of only and should provide ADA accessibility. the cable at the tower can then be calculated, AASHTO Guide Specifications for Design of in this case it was T=(53.42+21.42)1/2=57.5 Pedestrian Bridges requires a load capacity of kips. The cable force on the approach span 85 psf with an allowable reduction for loaded side of the tower must be checked since this areas over 400 square feet. This reduced varies with the angle of the cable on that side.
    [Show full text]
  • DBE/Swam Opportunity Event September 11, 2019 Presentation Outline
    Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Project DBE/SWaM Opportunity Event September 11, 2019 Presentation Outline . Introduction - Our Team: Hampton Roads Connector Partners (HRCP) . HRBT Expansion Project Overview - Scope - Benefits - Timeline and Milestones . Public Outreach . Small Business Opportunity . Q&A Session 2 2 Our Team 3 3 The Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel . First Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (current westbound tunnel) opened in November 1957 . Eastbound tunnel opened in November 1976 . December 2016 - Commonwealth Transportation Board approved expansion of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel 4 4 HRBT Expansion Project Project Funding . Hampton Roads Transportation Fund to fund 95 percent of the project . Monies raised through regional gas and sales taxes . Other project funding includes $200 million from the Commonwealth’s SMART SCALE program . $108 million from VDOT to fund replacement of the Norfolk Side Trestle Bridges in Norfolk 5 5 HRBT Expansion Project The Current Design-Build Project . Comprehensive Agreement between Commonwealth of Virginia and Hampton Roads Connector Partners (HRCP) signed in April 2019 . HRCP CJV Partners: Dragados, VINCI Construction, Flatiron Constructors, Dodin Campenon Bernard . Expansion is a design-build project . Designers: HDR and Mott MacDonald . Project Cost: $3.8 Billion 6 6 HRBT Expansion Project Project Benefits . Ease major congestion . Enhance travel time reliability . Support emergency evacuation . Improve safety . Increase capacity . Update transportation management systems 7 7 HRBT Expansion Project About the Tunnels . This is the fourth bored roadway tunnel project in the U.S. Twin two-lane tunnels to be built west of existing eastbound tunnel (Navy side) to carry all eastbound traffic . Existing eastbound tunnel and current westbound tunnel will accommodate all westbound traffic upon project completion .
    [Show full text]
  • HRBT Magazine
    HRBT EXPANSION HRBT Winter 2020 EXPANSION Magazine IN THIS ISSUE Full Steam Project Bird Economic Ahead Breaks Management Update 4 8 Ground 10 Plan 14 HRBT Message from Jim Utterback EXPANSION TABLE OF A project of this magnitude can only be made possible CONTENTS through regional cooperation. We are proud to have reached a momentous milestone on October 29, 2020 Project Overview .................... 3 when we held a groundbreaking event led by Virginia Construction Update ......... 4-5 Governor Ralph Northam, Secretary of Transportation TBM Update .........................6-7 Shannon Valentine, VDOT Commissioner Stephen Brich, as well as state and local leaders. As the largest View of new Groundbreaking Event .......8-9 infrastructure construction project in the history of the eight-lane superstructure. Bird Management ............. 10-11 Commonwealth, this is the culmination of the vision and Safety First.............................12 efforts of State and local leadership to alleviate one of the most congested corridors in the region. Staff Spotlight ......................13 The HRBT Expansion Project has made significant Economic Update ..................14 progress over the past few months. The project recently Community Update ...............15 received the necessary water quality and bridge permits. VDOT issued a Notice to Proceed to Hampton Roads Connector Partners (HRCP), which initiates full construction activities on the project. Crews continue PROJECT OVERVIEW Scan the above to prepare for the arrival of the Tunnel Boring Machine QR CODE (TBM) in 2021 and are working on expanding the New Concept Video Provides Glimpse existing North and South islands to accommodate the to view video. Of Finished Project new twin tunnels. Additionally, crews are mobilizing to begin work to widen the interstate in Norfolk We are getting a preview of what will eventually be the The existing trestle bridges currently support two lanes and Hampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Bridges in Stainless Steel
    Pedestrian Bridges in Stainless Steel Building Series, Volume 7 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES IN STAINLESS STEEL Euro Inox Euro Inox is the European market development associa- Full Members tion for stainless steel. Acerinox, The members of Euro Inox include: www.acerinox.es •European stainless steel producers Outokumpu, • National stainless steel development associations www.outokumpu.com •Development associations of the alloying element industries. ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni, A prime objective of Euro Inox is to create awareness of www.acciaiterni.com the unique properties of stainless steels and to further ThyssenKrupp Nirosta, their use in existing applications and in new markets. www.nirosta.de To assist this purpose, Euro Inox organises conferences Ugine & ALZ Belgium and seminars, and issues guidance in printed form Ugine & ALZ France and electronic format, to enable architects, designers, Groupe Arcelor, www.ugine-alz.com specifiers, fabricators, and end users, to become more familiar with the material. Euro Inox also supports Associate Members technical and market research. Acroni, www.acroni.si British Stainless Steel Association (BSSA), www.bssa.org.uk Cedinox, www.cedinox.es Centro Inox, www.centroinox.it Informationsstelle Edelstahl Rostfrei, www.edelstahl-rostfrei.de Informationsstelle für nichtrostende Stähle SWISS INOX, www.swissinox.ch Institut de Développement de l’Inox (I.D.-Inox), www.idinox.com International Chromium Development Association (ICDA), www.chromium-asoc.com International Molybdenum Association (IMOA), www.imoa.info Nickel Institute, www.nickelinstitute.org Polska Unia Dystrybutorów Stali (PUDS), www.puds.com.pl PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES IN STAINLESS STEEL Content Pedestrian Bridges in Stainless Steel Girder bridge in Stockholm, Sweden 2 First Edition 2004 (Building Series, Vol.
    [Show full text]