Design of Dutch solutions for bicycle and

Adriaan Kok • ipv Delft & The ipv Delft creative • Dutch Design Manual for Footbridges mail: [email protected] • Dutch Regulations for Footbridges website: ipvdelft.nl or ipvdelft.com • Dutch Design drivers & solutions

8th Australian Small Bridges Conference • Lessons Learned 27-28 Nov 2017, Surfers Paradise bridges ipv Delft • • urban furniture • • lighting footbridge aquaduct

bench footbridge footbridge

canopy footbridge lamp shade bicycle parking bridges ipv Delft • Footbridges CROW publication 342 Summary CROW publication 342 Dutch, by ipv Delft English, by ipv Delft BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUAL FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES

BRIEF DUTCH

BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUAL DESIGN MANUAL FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES FOR BICYCLE

As one of the Netherland’s main design offices, ipv Delft has focused on designing bicycle and pedestrian bridges for two decades. The company has used AND PEDESTRIAN their extensive experience in bridge design to write this publication. This design manual focuses on the fundamentals of bridge design, answering practical questions regardign issues such as bridge width and slopes. It also lists the things that should BRIDGES by ipv Delft be taken into account before starting on the actual design and it offers insight in the Dutch regulations regarding loads and collision forces. General advice on cost re- duction is also included and several of the company’s projects are shown to illustrate the theoretical contents. The Brief Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridges therefore is a vital source of both practical information and bridge design inspiration.

This publication is an English summary of the Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridges, which was published by CROW in 2014 and written by ipv Delft.

www.ipvdelft.com www.crow.nl

ipv Delft creative engineers +31 15 750 25 75 [email protected]

in cooperation with Free Download: ipvdelft.com / publications

Dutch Design Manual : Follows the Development Process

Traffic Network Analysis of Context Requirements Users

Design Checklist

Alignment Design Bridge Design Development Budget

Dutch Design Manual Structure: Follows the Development Process

Traffic Network Why Analysis of Context Requirements Users For Whom

Design Checklist

Alignment Design Bridge Design Development Budget What

Dutch Design Manual Intended Users: All involved disciplines & stakeholders

• Management • Urban Planning • Architects BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUAL FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES

• Structural BRIEF DUTCH

BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUAL DESIGN MANUAL • Traffic engineering FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES FOR BICYCLE

As one of the Netherland’s main bridge design offices, ipv Delft has focused on designing bicycle and pedestrian bridges for two decades. The company has used AND PEDESTRIAN their extensive experience in bridge design to write this publication. This design manual focuses on the fundamentals of bridge design, answering practical questions • Maintenance regardign issues such as bridge width and slopes. It also lists the things that should BRIDGES by ipv Delft be taken into account before starting on the actual design and it offers insight in the Dutch regulations regarding loads and collision forces. General advice on cost re- duction is also included and several of the company’s projects are shown to illustrate the theoretical contents. The Brief Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridges therefore is a vital source of both practical information and bridge design • Contractors inspiration. This publication is an English summary of the Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridges, which was published by CROW in 2014 and written by ipv Delft.

www.ipvdelft.com • Advocates www.crow.nl ipv Delft creative engineers +31 15 750 25 75 [email protected] • Local stakeholders

in cooperation with

Dutch Design Manual Intended Goal: Create Understanding Between representatives of Technical & Social requirements

City Officials (social)

we should

we try !

we try Design(er) do ! (technical) (social) (City) Citizens Engineers Advocates can’t we ? we try (technical) (social)

Dutch Design Manual Involvement of disciplines & stakeholders: De-Siloing the Process Analysis of Requirements Design Development Client Network Context Users Checklist Alignment Design Management       Engineering       Traffic       Urban planning       Lighting      Maintenance      Consultants       Architect       Subsoil     Local Businesses      Citizens      Advocates     Contractor 

Dutch Design Manual Structure: Follows the Development Process

Traffic Network Analysis of Context Requirements Users

Design Checklist

Alignment Design Bridge Design Development Budget

Dutch Design Manual The Netherlands UK

France

Italy

Spain

Context (international) The Netherlands in Europe The Netherlands Australia 17 mln inhabitants 23.4 mln inhabitants

Context (international) The Netherlands compared to Australia

307 km

Rotterdam 60 km 240 km

Canberra Germany Belgium

Context (national) The Netherlands compared to Sydney - Canberra Region Sydney

Amsterdam

Rotterdam

Canberra

Meuse Rhine

Network (national) Dutch network compared to Sydney - Canberra Region Network (national) over water and Network (international) The Netherlands, a hub for Europe Piles almost always required - 4 m + 8 m

- 7 m + 10 m 10 - 20 m

• Marshy Delta peat, clay & sand + 322 m 26% below sea level

Context (national) ground level and subsurface conditions 1995 flood

Flood Risk Areas 26% below sea level 29% above sea level risk of flooding by river Context (national) flooding risk - 15 ºC in Winter + 35 ºC in Summer

Context (national) 50 ºC temperature difference Natural Constraints Exploring the world

Limited Resources Open to new ideas

Context (national) resourcefull by constraints Travel Time bike & car equal up to 7.5 km

15 km

Beach 7.5 km

Amsterdam

Airport

Network (regional) travel time in dense populated areas 8 mln people with all needs within cycling distance

Amsterdam

Rotterdam

Eindhoven

Network (national) travel time in dense populated areas Dutch King

• 18 million bikes

• > 14 million trips / day

• 35.000 km bike path

• 2500 km • 8 million cars

Network (national) Cycling Facts Network (national) need for a lot of bridges Users Not intended Not intended , Hooligans, ... Determine • Needed Space • Road Planning Regular • Loads Occasionally Cyclists, , • Abuse Mopeds, Disabled Maintenance, Prevention Emergency Services

Special Other Disabled, Elderly, Utility Children companies ...

Users all potential users bridgesUsers bridge & Intersecting for a footbridge crossing a road regular regular regular

special special special occasional

not intended not intended not intended other 75 cm 25 - 80 cm 25 cm width sway distance

2,5 m vertical clearance

Users cyclists measurements 32.5 cm 62.5 cm railing wall

50 cm extra width in curve

Users cyclists distance to objects Width Hovenring two - two directions

cm 32.5 75 25 75 25 75 25 75 32.5 4.4 m

Users cyclists deck width minimum width one way minimum width two way in curve

32.5 75 32.5 cm 32.5 50 75 25 75 32.5 cm

1.4 m 2,9 m

Users cyclists deck width 0,7 m 0,8 m 0,85 m

Users pedestrians measurements max. 20 m max. 0.5 m

≥ 0,9 m

≥ 1,8 m ≥ 1,2 m

≥ 0,9 m

Users pedestrians deck width ∆ H > 13 m Railing min. 1.2 m → ∆ H 1-13 m Railing 1 m → stairs & slopes min. Railing 0.85 m →

Australia (hand) railing height pedestrians 1.2 m cylists 1.4 m disabled, children 0.7 m

Users railing height Dutch Fx, Fy 3 kN/m

Australia Fx, Fy ? 0.75 - 3 kN/m (crowds) Openings < 0.1 m (wire) - 0.125 m Fy Fx < 0.1 m

Ø 0.5 m

Users railing openings and loads ipv Delft • railing designs type & infill

wire wire cable mesh

glass wood lamellas bars - balusters

structural structural structural decorative Railing height ? Railing 1 & 1.4 m Railing 0.7, 1.2 & 1.4 m ? cyclists cyclists pedestrians pedestrians children 1m 1.4 m

J. Pesch Bridge, Toowong Crossing, Brisbane Proprietary Barrier Cairns

Users Australian railing examples Users unintended use - climable railing inward inclined wires cable mesh near petting zoo

Users unintended use - climable railing standard anti-throw-screen

2.5 m

Users unintended use - anti-throw-screen integrated stainless cable mesh anti-throw-screen

Users unintended use - anti-throw-screen Concentrated Load 7 kN 0n surface of 0.1 x 0.1 m

Uniformly Distributed Load 5 kN/m² (5 kPa) Reduction allowed using formula: Uniform load = 2.0 + (120/bridge length +30) kPa Allowed when no crowds are expected. With minimum of 2.5 kPa

Users pedestrians & cyclists loads Maintenance Vehicle specifications • 2 axles with a 3 m wheelbase; • Axle load of 25 kN (2500 kg); • 2 wheels / axle, with a 1.75 m track width; • 0,25 m x 0,25 m contact surface / wheel.

Users standard maintenance vehicle loads • 9 metric tons maintainance vehicle - Hovenring

Users Heavy maintenance vehicle loads Unauthorized Vehicle specifications: • 2 axles with a 3 m wheelbase • Characteristic axle load of 40 kN & 80 kN • 2 wheels per axle, with a 1,3 m track width • 0,2 m x 0,2 m contact surface per wheel.

Users Unauthorized vehicle loads min. 4.6 m - 7 m (no collision load) vertical clearance

Users vertical clearance car traffic Road Collision Load on Bridge Deck (Fdx) Eurocodes Dutch appendix Highways 500 kN 2000 kN outside urban areas 375 kN 1500 kN Roads within urban areas 250 kN 100 kN carparks 75 kN 100 -200 kN

loads for bridges for all traffic types

Collision Load Reduction for Clearances > 4.8 m Collision Load reduces lineairly 4.8 m 100% 7.0 m 0%

Users collsion loads by car traffic on the bridge deck Road Collision Load on Supports (Fdx) Eurocodes Dutch appendix Highways 1000 kN 2000 kN Roads outside urban areas 750 kN 1500 kN Roads within urban areas 500 kN 1000 kN carparks 50-150 kN 100 -200 kN

No Collision Load when Distance support - axis closest Highways > 20 m Roads outside urban areas > 15 m Roads wthin urban areas > 10 m carparks > 5 m

Users collsion loads by car traffic on supports Collision Loads Commonly used Signage Portals Collision Loads Custom designed Anti-Collision Portals Think Filter !

Collision Loads Anti-Collision Portals proven usefull 5.5 - 12 m vertical clearance

Users vertical clearance commercial vessels 30 m vertical clearance

Users vertical clearance sailing ships Users sailing in the Netherlands Alignment movable bridges to prevent large height differences 7.5 - 8.5 m vertical clearance

Users vertical clearance railroads Ramp Success Factors • Height Difference • Grade • Directness • Alternatives • Stretches

Users - Alignment ramp success factors Reducing Height Difference • Minimize structural deck height • Lowering crossed area

lowered

Users - Alignment reducing Height Difference Ramp Grade

11% Ramp Difficulty: Z = H²/L 10% 9% target normal 8% circumstances 7% less wind nuisance 6% less comfortable 5% 4% Max. Z = 0.2 3% more wind nuisance 2% more comfortable 1% Target Z = 0.075 Min. Z = 0.033 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 average grade (%) height (m)

Users - Alignment ramp grade Directness, Alternatives, Flat stretches

95m 5.8% 265m, 2.1%

190m 2.9%

225m, 2.4% 200m 2.8%

25 m Flat stretches 105m 5.2% • over 3 -5 m height • in bends in ramp • at end of ramp

Users - Alignment directness, alternative routes, flat stretches Structure: Follows the Development Process

Traffic Network Why Analysis of Context Requirements Users For Whom

Design Checklist

Alignment Design Bridge Design Development Budget What

Dutch Design Manual Traffic Network Finding the best bridge location

Analyse • Network demand - regular users - number of users A

• Route restrictions A’ • Adjacent route (A’, B’) B’

B

Dutch Design Manual Network as Design Driver

Road Bridge aligment

Highway A2

Cycle Network Utilitarian Recreational

Eindhoven Highway bridge Traffic Network - Alignment Existing Road Bridge

118430 Widening Existing Bridge

3501 25.60 New Bridge over On Ramp

talud 1:2

6189

36728 3% R16250 19816

25.09 Highway A2

19.81

3500 Arterial Road 24.10 19.40 On Ramptopboog = R3000 R145442 24.50 New

24.40

27.75+ 24.15

6218 R17750 TOELICHTING 500 - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT

R148250

500 IPV DELFT 24.00 - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING 500 3500 - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 55763 500 19.68 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT 3500 - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD R108850 19.79 58655 - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. 36292 - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL 19.54

20.99 PROJECT EHN.20 FIETSBRUG A2/N2 LANGSDOORSNEDE Slagboom novotel op basis luchtfoto 20.79 OPDRACHTGEVER SCHAAL 1:100 Eindhoven19.30 Highway bridge Alignment by Traffic Engineers GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN 19.10 ONDERDEEL TRACE ONTWERP GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS Voorstel nieuwe locatie EHN.20.SO.TEK.01 10.01.2017 0.9 CONCEPT Rekening houden met touringcar / bevoorrading 1A Rijbaanscheiding GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT

19.78 X 1:500 MM A2 (594x420) voetboog = R4000

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\EHN.20-basis-ontwerp-Eindhoven.dwg Existing Road Bridge

Widening Existing Bridge

Eindhoven Highway bridge Existing Road Bridge 118430 Proposed Alignment • 5 Radii 16, 17, 108, 115, 145 m Existing Bridge • Varying Width 3.5 - 6.2 m widening existing bridge 3501 • Span Lenght ? 25.60

Highwa A2 talud 1:2

6189 6.2 m 36728 3% R16250 16 m 19816 25.09

19.81

3500 24.10 19.40 Arterial Road topboog = R3000 R145442 24.50 145 m 3.5 m 24.40 New On Ramp

27.75+ 24.15 17 m

6218 R17750 TOELICHTING 500 6.2 m - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT

R148250

500 IPV DELFT

24.00 115 m - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING 500 3500 - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 55763 500 19.68 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT 3500 - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD R108850 19.79 3.5 m 58655 - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. 36292 108 m - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL 3.5 m 19.54

20.99 PROJECT EHN.20 FIETSBRUG A2/N2 LANGSDOORSNEDE Slagboom novotel op basis luchtfoto Eindhoven Highway bridge Analysis Proposed Alignment 1 20.79 OPDRACHTGEVER SCHAAL 1:100 19.30 GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN 19.10 ONDERDEEL TRACE ONTWERP GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS Voorstel nieuwe locatie EHN.20.SO.TEK.01 10.01.2017 0.9 CONCEPT Rekening houden met touringcar / bevoorrading 1A Rijbaanscheiding GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT

19.78 X 1:500 MM A2 (594x420) voetboog = R4000

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\EHN.20-basis-ontwerp-Eindhoven.dwg * * * * * 0 2 4 6 8m * * * * * *

* ZUID NOORD

* * *

N * * * * 4579

* 78 78

* * * 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337

* *

* * * H2b * * α

*

* *

* * * * H1b

* VOEG OVERGANG VIIADUCT H1a * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

* * *

* *

* * *

* *

* * *

* * *

* *

* * *

* *

* * *

* * *

* *

* *

* ZUID NOORD * *

*

* * α α

* * *

* * WERKGRENS * *

H1b H1a

* H2b H2a

* * * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

* * *

* * ASLIJN TRACE

* * *

* * *

* *

* * * Optimized Alignment *

*

* * *

* * *

* * ZUID NOORD

Using Grasshopper plugin for Rhino * * *

* * *

* * * *

* α α

* * * *

* H2b H2a

19, 130 m * * VOEG OVERGANG * Existing Bridge H1 H1a H2b • 2 Radii *

*

* * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP B.K. VERHARDING * * widening existing bridge * * * * * 4.5 m * • 1 Width * * * * * *

* Overgang bestaand viaduct (KW8) naar nieuwe brug, nieuw tracé over toerit (KW7) * * ZUID NOORD * Start overgang van lessenaars- naar dakprofiel * WERKGRENS * * Positie* landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) 17 m Uitvoering nader te detailleren. • 1 Span Lenght * * * * Highwa A2 VOEG * * * BRUG OVER OPRIT - AANLANDING * * *

* H2b H2a * * * * α α * *

* H1b H1a * * * R19120 NIV BRUGDEK NAP Anthony Fokkerweg * B.K. VERHARDING * * * * * * * * 19 m * * * * 17 m * * 25.09 * * * * * * * * * * * ZUID NOORD Anthony Fokkerweg * * * * * * * * α α * *

* H2b H2a * * * H1 H1a H2b * * * 19.81 * NIV BRUGDEK NAP * * * B.K. VERHARDING 24.10 * * * * * topboog = R3000 * 19.40* * Arterial *Road * * * 4.5 m * * 24.50 Eventueel benodigde afscherming van * steunpunten langs toerit nader detailleren. * * *

* * 24.40* R19120 * *

* 4579

78 78 * * New On Ramp * 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337

* *

* ZUID NOORD * * *

R130000 * * *

α α *

* ASLIJN TRACE * * * 24.15 19 m*

* * * * H1b H1a

* Positie landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) H2b H2a Uitvoering nader te detailleren * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

Onderzijde steunpunt, poer of positie watergang * * zo uitwerken dat de beoogde functionaliteit

van de watergang is gewaarborgd. *

*

* *

*

* *

*

24.00* 130 m * *

*

* *

*

* *

* *

* * *

* *

* *

*

* *

* *

*

* *

* 19.68

* * * * *

* * *

*

*

* *

*

* *

*

* * *

* *

*

* 4.5 m *

*

*

* WERKGRENS 19.79 *

*

* *

* *

17 m* PLAN

*

*

* SCHAAL 1:100 *

*

*

* *

*

*

*

*

* * *

* *

* * *

*

* * * * 17 m * *

*

* * 19.54 TOELICHTING

*

* * * - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT

* * *

* * * IPV DELFT * * - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING EINDE BESTAANDE BRUG - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 106.07 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT PARAMETERS IN FUNCTIE VAN DE COORDINATEN NIVEAU BRUGDEK 17 m - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD LANGS DE ASLIJN [m] NAP [m] - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL HOOGTE HANDREGEL NOORD H1a [m] PROJECT HOOGTE HANDREGEL ZUID EHN.20 Fietsverbinding Anthony Fokkerweg A2 / N2 H1b [m] OPDRACHTGEVER HOOGTE BOVENREGEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN NOORD Eindhoven Highway bridge Optimized Alignment 1 ONDERDEEL H2a [m] PLATTEGROND TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS HOOGTE BOVENREGEL ZUID EHN.20.SO.TEK.02 14.04.2017 1.0 DEFINITIEF H2b [m] GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT WW 1:200 MM A0 (1189x841) HOEK VAN DE STIJLEN alpha [graden]

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_model_20170414c.dwg business area

city centre access road

access road

Enschede Bridge Context Business Area

Visibillity

Visibillity New Bridge Old, Characteristic Trees

City Centre

Enschede Bridge Context - Alignment Constraints bridge position

required height 4,6m traffic lights line of sight

low traffic light 2,5

stopping distance stopmarker

R 75 m (5x) R 180 m (5x)

Enschede Bridge Final Alignment prefab deck 1 type

Enschede Bridge Modular Facts & Figures • bridge length 280 m • ramp length 150 m • width 3.5 m • lightingelement • budget: €2.0 million • costs: €1.4 million

Enschede Bridge Facts & Figures Existing Road Bridge

Widening Existing Bridge

Highway A2

New On Ramp

Arterial Road

New Bridge over On Ramp

Eindhoven Highway bridge Optimized Alignment 1 * * * * * * * 8m 6 4 2 0 * * * *

NOORD ZUID *

* * *

* * N 4579 * *

78 78 *

337 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 336 * * *

* *

* * * H2b α * *

*

* *

* * * H1b *

H1a VIIADUCT OVERGANG VOEG * NIV BRUGDEK NAP BRUGDEK NIV * *

B.K. VERHARDING B.K. *

* * *

* *

* * *

* *

* * *

* * *

* *

* * *

* *

* * *

* * *

* *

* *

NOORD ZUID * * *

*

α α * *

* * *

WERKGRENS * * * *

H1a H1b

H2a H2b *

* * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP BRUGDEK NIV *

B.K. VERHARDING B.K. *

* * *

* TRACE ASLIJN * * * *

* * *

* * * * *

0 2 4 6 8m * * * *

* * * * *

* * * *

* *

* ZUID NOORD *

*

* * * * *

*

N * * NOORD ZUID * *

* * 4579 *

* 78 78 * *

* 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337

* * * *

*

* * *

*

* * * * *

H2b α α *

* * α *

* * * *

* H2a H2b *

VOEG OVERGANG VIADUCT OVERGANG VOEG *

* * * * * H1 H1a H2b *

* H1b

* VOEG OVERGANG VIIADUCT H1a *

*

* * NAP BRUGDEK NIV NIV BRUGDEK NAP *

* VERHARDING B.K. B.K. VERHARDING *

* * *

* * *

* * *

* * * * * *

* * *

* * * * * *

* * * * * *

* *

* Only Railing Highest Point Anti-Throw-Screen brug, nieuwe naar (KW8) viaduct bestaand Overgang

* NOORD ZUID * * (KW7) toerit over tracé nieuw

* * dakprofiel naar lessenaars- van overgang Start *

* * *

* * WERKGRENS * *

* 20º (KW7) toerit over brug landhoofd * Positie

Uitvoering nader te detailleren. te nader Uitvoering * * *

* * 4.5 m *

* * * * * * * VOEG

* ZUID NOORD AANLANDING - OPRIT OVER BRUG *

* * * *

* 3 m *

* H2b

* α H2a 0º α *

* *

* * * * * WERKGRENS

* α α * * * * *

H1b H1a H1a H1b * * 1.2 m H2b H2a

* * * * * * R19120 * NAP BRUGDEK NIV NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* VERHARDING B.K. B.K. VERHARDING * Fokkerweg Anthony * * *

* * grating *

* 0.8 m * *

* ASLIJN TRACE *

* * * *

* *

* * * * * stainless steel edge element prefab deck integrated lighting anti-throw-screen

* * * * ( cable mesh infill ) *

* * * * 25.09

* * * *

* * * *

* * *

* * * * Eindhoven Highway bridge Deck Principle On Ramp Bridge ZUID NOORD *

* NOORD ZUID * *

* * * * * * * * Fokkerweg Anthony

* *

* * * * * *

* *

* α α

* α α *

* * * * * H2b H2a

H2a H2b *

* *

* VOEG OVERGANG VIADUCT *

* * * H1 H1a H2b H1 * H1a H2b

* 19.81 * * *

* * * NAP BRUGDEK NIV NIV BRUGDEK NAP * B.K. VERHARDING

B.K. VERHARDING B.K. * * * * * * 24.10 * * * * * * * * * * 19.40 * R3000 = topboog * * * * * * * * * * *

* Overgang bestaand viaduct (KW8) naar nieuwe brug, * * * Eventueel benodigde afscherming van afscherming benodigde Eventueel nieuw tracé over toerit (KW7) 24.50 * * * ZUID NOORD detailleren. nader toerit langs steunpunten * Start overgang van lessenaars- naar dakprofiel * * * * WERKGRENS * *

Positie* landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) * * Uitvoering nader te detailleren. * R19120 * 24.40 * * *

* 4579 *

78 78 * * * * VOEG * * 337 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 336

* BRUG OVER OPRIT - AANLANDING * *

NOORD ZUID * * * * * * *

* R130000

H2b H2a * *

* α α *

* * * * * TRACE ASLIJN * * α α * 24.15 *

* * * * *

* H1b H1a H1a H1b * H2a H2b

* (KW7) toerit over brug landhoofd Positie * * * * * detailleren te nader Uitvoering R19120 NIV BRUGDEK NAP Anthony Fokkerweg NAP BRUGDEK NIV B.K. VERHARDING * VERHARDING B.K.

* *

* *

* watergang positie of poer steunpunt, Onderzijde zo uitwerken dat de beoogde functionaliteit beoogde de dat uitwerken zo *

* * * gewaarborgd. is watergang de van

* * * *

* * * * *

* * * * * * *

25.09 * * * 24.00 * * *

*

* * *

* * * *

* *

* * *

*

* *

* *

*

*

* *

* *

*

*

*

19.68 * * *

* * *

* * *

* ZUID NOORD *

* *

*

* *

*

*

* * * * *

*

* *

* *

Anthony Fokkerweg *

* *

* * *

19.79 WERKGRENS * * *

* *

* *

*

* *

* PLAN

*

* *

SCHAAL 1:100 SCHAAL *

*

α α * *

* * *

* * * *

*

*

* * *

*

H2b H2a *

* * *

*

* * * * * * *

* *

*

* TOELICHTING 19.54 * *

H1 *

H1a *

- OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT TOEPASSING: VAN AUTEURSRECHT HET H2b IS TEKENING DEZE OP - * * * * * * * 19.81 *

* DELFT IPV * * * PRODUCTIETEKENING ALS GEBRUIKT WORDEN NIET KAN TEKENING DEZE - NIV BRUGDEK NAP * * * TE CONTROLE TER UITVOERING VOOR DIENEN PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN - B.K. VERHARDING BRUG BESTAANDE EINDE * * DELFT IPV AAN VOORGELEGD WORDEN 106.07 24.10 BRUGDEK NIVEAU COORDINATEN DE VAN FUNCTIE IN PARAMETERS * * VERMELD ANDERS TENZIJ MILLIMETERS, IN MATEN ALLE - [m] NAP [m] ASLIJN DE LANGS * N.A.P. T.O.V. METERS IN PEILMATEN - * STELSEL GRADEN 360 HET IN GRADEN - * topboog = R3000 * 19.40* RD-STELSEL HET IN MILLIMETERS IN COORDINATEN - * HANDREGEL HOOGTE * * NOORD * [m] H1a PROJECT * * * HANDREGEL HOOGTE 24.50 Eventueel benodigde afscherming van N2 / A2 Fokkerweg Anthony Fietsverbinding EHN.20 ZUID * steunpunten langs toerit nader detailleren. [m] H1b * OPDRACHTGEVER * * GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN GEMEENTE BOVENREGEL HOOGTE NOORD

* * ONDERDEEL 24.40* R19120 * * [m] H2a * PLATTEGROND 4579

78 78 * * STATUS VERSIE DATUM TEKENINGNUMMER * 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337 BOVENREGEL HOOGTE

* * DEFINITIEF 1.0 14.04.2017 EHN.20.SO.TEK.02 ZUID

* ZUID NOORD [m] H2b * * * FORMAAT EENHEID SCHAAL GETEKEND

R130000 * * * (1189x841) A0 MM 1:200 WW

α α *

ASLIJN TRACE * STIJLEN DE VAN HOEK

* * [graden] alpha * 24.15 *

* * [email protected] 75 25 750 015 Delft BB 2611 39 Delft Oude

* V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_model_20170414c.dwg * H1b H1a

* Positie landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) H2b H2a Uitvoering nader te detailleren * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

Onderzijde steunpunt, poer of positie watergang * * zo uitwerken dat de beoogde functionaliteit

van de watergang is gewaarborgd. *

*

* *

*

* *

*

24.00* * *

*

* *

*

* *

* *

* * *

* *

* *

*

* *

* *

*

* *

* 19.68

* * * * *

* * *

*

*

* *

*

* *

*

* *

*

* *

* *

*

*

*

* WERKGRENS 19.79 *

*

* *

*

*

* PLAN

*

*

* SCHAAL 1:100 *

*

*

* *

*

*

*

*

* * *

* *

* * *

*

* * * * * *

*

* * 19.54 TOELICHTING

*

* * * - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT

* * *

* * * IPV DELFT * * - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING EINDE BESTAANDE BRUG - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 106.07 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT PARAMETERS IN FUNCTIE VAN DE COORDINATEN NIVEAU BRUGDEK LANGS DE ASLIJN [m] NAP [m] - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL HOOGTE HANDREGEL NOORD H1a [m] PROJECT HOOGTE HANDREGEL ZUID EHN.20 Fietsverbinding Anthony Fokkerweg A2 / N2 H1b [m] OPDRACHTGEVER HOOGTE BOVENREGEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN NOORD ONDERDEEL H2a [m] PLATTEGROND TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS HOOGTE BOVENREGEL ZUID EHN.20.SO.TEK.02 14.04.2017 1.0 DEFINITIEF H2b [m] GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT WW 1:200 MM A0 (1189x841) HOEK VAN DE STIJLEN alpha [graden]

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_model_20170414c.dwg * * * * * 0 2 4 6 8m * * * * * *

* ZUID NOORD * *

* anti-throw-screen ( cable mesh infill )

N * * * * 4579

* 78 4.5 m 78

* * * 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337

* * prefab barrier with

* * * 2.8 m H2b * lighting element * α

*

* *

* * * * H1b

* VOEG OVERGANG VIIADUCT H1a * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

* * *

* * reused

* * * existing

* * cladding

* * *

* * *

* * new prefab concrete girders widened existing road bridge

* * *

* *

* * * Eindhoven Highway bridge Deck Principle Widened Existing Bridge

* * *

* *

* *

* ZUID NOORD * *

*

* * α α

* * *

* * WERKGRENS * *

H1b H1a

* H2b H2a

* * * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

* * *

* * ASLIJN TRACE

* * *

* * *

* *

* * *

* *

* * *

* * *

* * ZUID NOORD

* * *

* * *

* * * *

* α α

* *

* *

* H2b H2a * VOEG OVERGANG VIADUCT

* *

H1 H1a H2b

* *

* * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP B.K. VERHARDING * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* Overgang bestaand viaduct (KW8) naar nieuwe brug, nieuw tracé over toerit (KW7) * * ZUID NOORD * Start overgang van lessenaars- naar dakprofiel * WERKGRENS * * Positie* landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) Uitvoering nader te detailleren. * * * * VOEG * * * BRUG OVER OPRIT - AANLANDING * * *

* H2b H2a * * * * α α * *

* H1b H1a * * * R19120 NIV BRUGDEK NAP Anthony Fokkerweg * B.K. VERHARDING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 25.09 * * * * * * * * * * * ZUID NOORD Anthony Fokkerweg * * * * * * * * α α * *

* H2b H2a * * * H1 H1a H2b * * * 19.81 * NIV BRUGDEK NAP * * * B.K. VERHARDING 24.10 * * * * * topboog = R3000 * 19.40* * * * *

* * * 24.50 Eventueel benodigde afscherming van * steunpunten langs toerit nader detailleren. * * *

* * 24.40* R19120 * *

* 4579

78 78 * * * 336 750 250 750 250 750 250 750 337

* *

* ZUID NOORD * * *

R130000 * * *

α α *

* ASLIJN TRACE * * * 24.15 *

* * * * H1b H1a

* Positie landhoofd brug over toerit (KW7) H2b H2a Uitvoering nader te detailleren * * NIV BRUGDEK NAP

* B.K. VERHARDING

Onderzijde steunpunt, poer of positie watergang * * zo uitwerken dat de beoogde functionaliteit

van de watergang is gewaarborgd. *

*

* *

*

* *

*

24.00* * *

*

* *

*

* *

* *

* * *

* *

* *

*

* *

* *

*

* *

* 19.68

* * * * *

* * *

*

*

* *

*

* *

*

* *

*

* *

* *

*

*

*

* WERKGRENS 19.79 *

*

* *

*

*

* PLAN

*

*

* SCHAAL 1:100 *

*

*

* *

*

*

*

*

* * *

* *

* * *

*

* * * * * *

*

* * 19.54 TOELICHTING

*

* * * - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT

* * *

* * * IPV DELFT * * - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING EINDE BESTAANDE BRUG - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 106.07 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT PARAMETERS IN FUNCTIE VAN DE COORDINATEN NIVEAU BRUGDEK LANGS DE ASLIJN [m] NAP [m] - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL HOOGTE HANDREGEL NOORD H1a [m] PROJECT HOOGTE HANDREGEL ZUID EHN.20 Fietsverbinding Anthony Fokkerweg A2 / N2 H1b [m] OPDRACHTGEVER HOOGTE BOVENREGEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN NOORD ONDERDEEL H2a [m] PLATTEGROND TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS HOOGTE BOVENREGEL ZUID EHN.20.SO.TEK.02 14.04.2017 1.0 DEFINITIEF H2b [m] GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT WW 1:200 MM A0 (1189x841) HOEK VAN DE STIJLEN alpha [graden]

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_model_20170414c.dwg adaptive Anti-Throw-Screen

1 pier type

only high where required

Eindhoven Highway bridge Impressions in height changing Anti-Throw-Screen

Eindhoven Highway bridge Impressions Existing Guide rail

Cladding Existing Bridge

Cladding & Barrier with illuminated translaucent panels

Eindhoven Highway bridge Impressions Cylists increase Waiting Time Cars

Existing Of Ramp

Existing Road Bridge

Widening Existing Bridge

Highway A2

New On Ramp Vertical Clearance Arterial Road • On Ramp +5 m • Highway +7 m New Bridge over On Ramp

Eindhoven Highway bridge Possible improvements of the alignment Network as Design Driver

Road Bridge aligment 1

Arterial road aligment 2

Cycle Network Utilitarian Recreational

Highway A2

Eindhoven Highway bridge Traffic Network Analysis - Alignment Options Arterial Road Existing Road Bridge

New On Ramp No Cyclists using

Utilitarian Traffic Lights 140 m

Existing Of Ramp Utilitarian

Recreational

Recreational Nearby Construction Site

Highway A2

Utilitarian

Eindhoven Highway bridge Traffic Network Analysis - Alternative Alignment 60000 40000 60000

Arch Bridge Modular Bridge 2000 PROJECT EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONY FOKKERWEG-A2/N2 OPDRACHTGEVER GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN ONDERDEEL AANZICHT CONCEPT 1 TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS

EHN.20.SO.TEK.01 2.05.2017 0.9 CONCEPT PROJECT GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONY FOKKERWEG-A2/N2 AANZICHT 4000 SCHAAL 1:500 WW 1:500 MM A3 OPDRACHTGEVER GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN ONDERDEEL Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected] V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_v07(WW).dwg AANZICHT CONCEPT 3 TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS 4995 EHN.20.SO.TEK.03 2.05.2017 0.9 CONCEPT 8000 GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT WW 1:500 MM A3

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_v07(WW).dwg 55291

PROJECT EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONY FOKKERWEG-A2/N2 A-symmetrical Cable-stayed BridgeOPDRACHTGEVER Symmetrical Cable-stayed Bridge GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN ONDERDEEL PROJECT AANZICHT CONCEPT 2 EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONY FOKKERWEG-A2/N2 TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS OPDRACHTGEVER EHN.20.SO.TEK.02 2.05.2017 0.9 CONCEPT GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN ONDERDEEL GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT AANZICHT AANZICHT CONCEPT 5 SCHAAL 1:500 WW 1:500 MM A3 TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS EHN.20.SO.TEK.01 02.05.2017 0.9 CONCEPT Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected] GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_v07(WW).dwg AK 1:500 MM A3 (420x297)

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_v06(WW)(AK).dwg Eindhoven Highway bridge Alternative Alignment - Bridge Options Facts & Figures • length main span 104 m • lenght ramps 660 m • width 5 m • costs bridge € 1.5 million euro • total costs € 8.2 million euro

Eindhoven Highway bridge Bridge Eindhoven Highway bridge Modular 4469

2000

750 250 750 250

811 2795 3750 1090 492

TOELICHTING - OP DEZE TEKENING IS HET AUTEURSRECHT VAN TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT IPV DELFT - DEZE TEKENING KAN NIET WORDEN GEBRUIKT ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN VOOR UITVOERING TER CONTROLE TE 5500 WORDEN VOORGELEGD AAN IPV DELFT - ALLE MATEN IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ ANDERS VERMELD - PEILMATEN IN METERS T.O.V. N.A.P. - GRADEN IN HET 360 GRADEN STELSEL - COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN HET RD-STELSEL

PROJECT GRA.01.Haalbaarheidsstudie brug Zeewolde - Horst OPDRACHTGEVER Provincie Flevoland ONDERDEEL Eindhoven Highway bridge Modular Truss Bridge AANZICHTEN BRUG CONCEPT 1 - BRUG + GRONDLICHAAM TEKENINGNUMMER DATUM VERSIE STATUS IPV.00.VO.TEK.02 24.11.2016 0.9 CONCEPT GETEKEND SCHAAL EENHEID FORMAAT AK 1:2000 MM A2 (594x420)

Oude Delft 39 2611 BB Delft 015 750 25 75 [email protected]

V:\4_projecten\GRA.01 brug strand Horst\GRA.01_2_tekeningen\GRA.01_1_SO\GRA.01_SO_2D_VARIANTENSTUDIE_v09-SAT2.dwg Eindhoven Highway bridge Alternative Alignment - Cable-stayed Bridge Advantages • Structurally / Cost Efficient • No Piers in Highway - No obstruction of sightlines - Less hindrance due to construction

131.5 m

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Facts & Figures • length main span 104 m • lenght ramps 660 m • width 5 m • costs bridge € 1.5 million euro • total costs € 8.2 million euro

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Reference Grashopper Optimized Ramps

Eindhoven Highway bridgehoogteverschil: Ramps ca. Arch 8 meter Bridge Reference lengte: ca. 288 meter hellingspercentage: ca. 2,8%

hellingbaan oostzijde Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Reference V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_BOOGBRUG_v10.dwg DEKDOORSNEDE SCHAAL 1:20 VERHOOGDE SCHAMPKANT 0,65 m VERLICHTING GEÏNTEGREERDE Cables /Rods Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge -Deck Cross Section

N.T.B. CA. 200 625 750 250 750 Concrete Deck 5 m 3750 5000 250 750 250 750 Steel EdgeGirders Oude Delft39 GETEKEND AK EHN.20.SO2.TEK.91 TEKENINGNUMMER PRINCIPE DEKDOORSNEDE METVERHOOGDE SCHAMPKANT ONDERDEEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN OPDRACHTGEVER EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONYFOKKERWEGA2/N2 PROJECT 625 2611BBDelft SCHAAL DATUM 1:20 22.06.2017 0157502575 1.2 m VERSIE MM 1.3 EENHEID [email protected] STATUS FORMAAT A3 CONCEPT Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Details Bridge Deck Wishbone Configuration Leaning Configuration under construction under design

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Structural Optimization (Grashopper)

Drawing1.dwg

Drawing1.dwg Narrowing Deck Grashopper model

Straight Deck Grashopper model

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Structural Optimization Vertical Cable Alignment

Crossed, Netted Cable Alignment

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Structural Optimization Other Cable Alignments

21.1 m (1/6 L)

Arch Height

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Structural Optimization Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge -Details Edge Girder &Railing Integrated Arch Illumination Integrated Arch Extra HighCurb/Edge(0.2m) Infill -StainlessStteelCableMesh hand railwithIntegratedLighting V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_BOOGBRUG_v10.dwg DEKDOORSNEDE SCHAAL 1:20 VERHOOGDE SCHAMPKANT 0,65 m 0,2 m VERLICHTING GEÏNTEGREERDE

N.T.B.

Potential Damper CA. 200 625 0,3 m 2 % 750 250 750 3750 5000 250 750 250 750 Oude Delft39 GETEKEND AK EHN.20.SO2.TEK.91 TEKENINGNUMMER PRINCIPE DEKDOORSNEDEMETVERHOOGDE SCHAMPKANT ONDERDEEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN OPDRACHTGEVER EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDING ANTHONY FOKKERWEG A2/N2 PROJECT 625 2611BBDelft SCHAAL DATUM 1:20 22.06.2017 0157502575 VERSIE MM 1.3 EENHEID [email protected] FORMAAT STATUS A3 CONCEPT Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Railing Infill Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Anti-Throw-Screen Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Arch illumination Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Arch illumination Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Arch illumination V:\4_projecten\EHN.20_brug_A2-N2_Eindhoven\2_tekeningen\1_SO\DWG\EHN.20_2D-TEKENINGEN_BOOGBRUG_v10.dwg DEKDOORSNEDE SCHAAL 1:20 VERHOOGDE SCHAMPKANT VERLICHTING GEÏNTEGREERDE top cable-StainlessCable Wiring &fixationPoints hand railwithIntegratedLighting, Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge -Details Railing

N.T.B. CA. 200 625 750 250 750 3750 5000 250 750 250 750 Oude Delft39 GETEKEND AK EHN.20.SO2.TEK.91 TEKENINGNUMMER PRINCIPE DEKDOORSNEDEMETVERHOOGDESCHAMPKANT ONDERDEEL GEMEENTE EINDHOVEN OPDRACHTGEVER EHN.20 FIETSVERBINDINGANTHONYFOKKERWEGA2/N2 PROJECT 625 2611BBDelft SCHAAL DATUM 1:20 22.06.2017 0157502575 VERSIE MM 1.3 EENHEID [email protected] FORMAAT STATUS A3 CONCEPT custom aluminium extrusion profile

LED deck lighting fixation point LED facial lighting

Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Handrail Principle Hovenring Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - Handrail Principle Hovenring Eindhoven Highway bridge Arch Bridge - a Solution for All Requirements North Sea

7.5 km

Rijswijk The hague

recreational route

Rijswijk Network Analysis Schie

Rijswijk

3 Harbour

4

2

Highway A4 The Hague 1

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Possible bridge locations in the context Location 1: Fixed arch bridge • preferred by department of waterways • ramps of 300 at 3.5% needed • required vertical clearance of 7 m • estimated costs € 4 million

bikepath tramtrack & road bikepath/road

3,5%

7 m highway A4 3,5%

highway A4

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Possible bridges in the context Location 2: Double

• connects directly to existing routes • short steep 2.5 m high ramps • no supports and fenders in waterway • estimated costs € 6 million

harbour entrance

3 m

existing bikepaths

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Possible bridges in the context Location 3: Asymmetric cable-stayed swing bridge

• less susceptible to windforces • ramps partly integrated in • supports and fenders in waterway • estimated costs € 4 million

3 m

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Possible bridges in the context Location 4: Symmetric cable-stayed swing bridge

• bridges both canal and harbour entrance • ramps partly integrated in embankment • lot of supports and fenders in waterway • estimated costs € 5.5 million

3 m obsolete bridge

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Possible bridges in the context Preferred concept • direct connection between existing routes • minimal hindrance during construction • estimated costs acceptable

RijswijkRijswijk Swing bridge Bridge swing bridge Concept at locationevaluation 3 ramps (H: 1.7 m) integrated in route turning space

RijswijkRijswijk Swing swing Bridge bridge Bridgerampdesign design 3 m

21 m

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Bridge design Rijswijk Swing Bridge Bridge design Pivot Point

Gear Unit

Counter Weight Maintenance Platform

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Bridge design Maintenance Platform

Rijswijk Swing Bridge Bridge design Facts & Figures • length 110 m • width 3,5 m • costs: €2.4 million

RijswijkRijswijk swing Swingbridge Bridge result, facts Result & figures Traffic Network Finding the best bridge location

Analyse • Network demand - regular users - number of users A

• Route restrictions A’ • Adjacent route (A’, B’) B’

B

Dutch Design Manual Traffic Network: Start with the Crossings

Because Crossings are: A • Hard to Integrate • Hard to Upgrade • Advertisers / Kickstarters • Gapclosers

B

Dutch Design Manual Context Location specific requirements & potential benefits

Analyse • Urban Planning A • Local Wishes • Ecology A’ • Land Ownership • Cables and Pipelines B’ • Subsurface Conditions • Potential Benefits B

Dutch Design Manual Context as Driver

prefab deck 1 pier type

Enschede Bridge Modular Construction Context as Driver

visibillity spare visibillity commercial characteristic traffic buildings trees lights

Enschede bridge Meandering Alignment Fitting in the Context Fietsverbinding Stationsweg Heerhugowaard

voor: Gemeente Heerhugowaard ontwerp ipv Delft © 2012 Heerhugowaard Station bridge Alignment Fitting in the Contect Possible main span materials bonus • steel no bonus • stainless steel € - 125.000,- • high performance concrete € - 175.000,- • fiber re-inforced composite € - 175.000,-

main span contour

Heerhugowaard Station bridge Main Span Contour - Optimal Materials Facts & Figures • bridge length 154 m • ramp length 120 m • width 3.5 m mainspan, 4m straight slopes, 6 m corners • costs: €1.7 million

Main Span Ramps High Performance Concrete On Site Concrete

Heerhugowaard Station bridge Maintenance Free Main Span Haarlem submerged bridge Context required height 2.5 m

rain water pump

Haarlem submerged bridge Cross Section Facts & Figures • length 110 m • width 5 m • slope < 4% • costs: €1.1 million

Haarlem submerged bridge Result future museum Hovenring Evoluon Light Needle

A2

Westcorridor Eindhoven Eindhoven Hovenring Fitting in with existing landmarks contextanalyse geschiedenis

Waalwijk bridges Referring to history ipv Delft creatieve ingenieurs Waalwijk bridges Referring to history contextanalyse geschiedenis Halvezolenlijn Waalwijk

ipv Delft creatieve ingenieurs Waalwijk bridges Referring to history Facts & Figures • length 7.9 m • width 2 m • costs: €92.000,-

ultra high strenght concrete (UHSC)

Waalwijk bridges Referring to history - leading to Dronryp movable Referring to history Dronryp movable bascule bridge Referring to history Dronryp movable bascule bridge Referring to history Steenwijk movable liftbridge An city entrance ready for the future Facts & Figures • length 20 m • width 18 m • costs: €1.200.000 • clearance width 8 m

Steenwijk movable liftbridge An city entrance ready for the future Facts & Figures • length 95 m • width 18 m • costs: €11.000.000 • clearance width 22 m

Gouda drawbridge low drawbridge fitting in with the Dutch landscape Gouda drawbridge low drawbridge fitting in with the Dutch landscape railyard Structural Railing hanging Stairs Dyke

Rotterdam Waalhaven bridge sparing the context foundation abutment steel pipe pile old bridge

Midden Delftland bridge sparing the context 1995 flood

Flood Risk Areas 26% below sea level 29% above sea level risk of flooding by river Context (national) flooding risk more room : normal channel : normal

more room : high channel: high

Context (national) river retention types floating roll-out-bridge hydrodynamic bridge

pop-up bridge hydrodynamic bridge

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area porous floating bridge

williow bridge floating bridge

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Floating concrete bridge

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Floating concrete bridge - cross section

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Floating concrete bridge - module princple

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area porous dam

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Hydrodynamic bridge

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Hydrodynamic bridge - cross section

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Hydrodynamic bridge - low maintenance

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area hydrodynamic bridge - module princple

Context (national) bridge concepts to cross flooded area Hydrodynamic bridge

Olst Fortmond bridge hydrodynamic bridge to cross flooded area Hydrodynamic bridge - low maintenance

Olst Fortmond bridge hydrodynamic bridge to cross flooded area hydrodynamic bridge

Zwolle Westenholte bridge hydrodynamic bridge to cross flooded area Tidal Floodplain Noordwaard Merwede river new

5.5 km

sea

11 km

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain water height +0.4 m -0.7 m water height to 2 m

water height +0.7 m - 1.35 m water height +2 m - 3 m

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain Bridge Types Tidal Floodplain Noordwaard

25 creek bridges 3 bridges in old dike

7 inlet / dike bridges 13 pumping stations

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain creek bridge

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain creek bridge 5.1 m

perch for birds steel railing 4.4 m to dry wings spray metalized with bronze steel railing 0.5 m spray metalized 1 m with bronze

prefab concrete girders porous concrete on site cast edge porous concrete on site cast edge

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain Bronze Railing

seawater resistant steel railing spray metalized with bronze (200 micron)

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain inlet / dike bridge

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain bridge in old dike

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain Birds Perch

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain Birds Perch - canoeist assist

Depoldering Noordwaard bridges bridges for a tidal floodplain Pumping Stations as Viewing Platforms

Depoldering Noordwaard pumping stations experience the tidal floodplain Contextual Benefits

• Lowering intersection for comfortable ramps • Ramps as sound barriers

lowered intersection

Eindhoven Hovenring benefits from the context Contextual Benefits

• Signage portals as high traffic filter

Eindhoven Hovenring benefits from the context Contextual Benefits

• bridge deck casted directly on existing earth dam • Using in soil casted piles

principeprofielen 3,5 m

stainless steel railing

0,3 m earth dam in soil casted piles Contextual Benefits

• bridge deck casted directly on existing earth dam • Using in soil casted piles

Breda Werkdonken bridge benefits from the context Foundation Piles almost always required 10 - 20 m

Flood Risk Areas 26% by sea 29% by

Context (national) ground level and subsurface conditions Foundation: steel pipe piles

bridge directly mounted on steel pipe piles

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: steel pipe piles

bridge directly mounted on steel pipe piles

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: steel pipe piles 1.25 m

6 m 6 m 6 m

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: concrete prefab piles

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: concrete prefab piles

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: steel sheet piles

Context - foundation common pile types Foundation: steel screw piles

Context - foundation common pile types List of requirements Gathering all requirements

Design Checklist Network Network Context Context

Users Bridge users Regulations Building Codes

Crossed Users

Dutch Design Manual Hot Dip Galvanized bolted in Australia

Bridge Design prevention Hot Dip Galvanized bolted structures in Australia

Bridge Design corrosion prevention Size of Hot Dip Galvanizing bath determines maximum size structural parts

Bridge Design corrosion prevention Hot Dip Galvanized bolted structures in the Netherlands

New Guardrail

Guardrail after approx. 15 years

Bridge Design corrosion prevention Spray Metalizing with in the Netherlands

Bridge Design corrosion prevention - spray metalizing Spray Metalized Structure without bolted connections

Bridge Design corrosion prevention - spray metalizing Bronze Railing

seawater resistant steel railing spray metalized with bronze (200 micron)

Bridge Design corrosion prevention - spray metalizing required height 2.5 m

rain water pump

Bridge Design corrosion prevention - vacuum closed cross section Facts & Figures • length 110 m • width 5 m • slope < 4% • costs: €1.1 million

Bridge Design corrosion prevention - offshore coating Composite deck - grip layer

Bridge Design decking materials Wooden Deck - grip layers

Bridge Design decking - materials Steel Deck - grip layer

Bridge Design decking - materials Concrete Deck - grip layer

Bridge Design decking - materials Ultra High Strength Concrete Deck - integrated grip

Bridge Design decking - materials Structure above deck: structural railing

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: structural railing

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: structural railing

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: structural railing

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: cable-stayed bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: cable-stayed bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: cable-stayed bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: cable-stayed bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: Arch bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: Arch bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure above deck: Arch bridge

Bridge Design structural types Structure below & above deck

Bridge Design structural types Structure below & above deck: lens truss

Bridge Design structural types Structure below & above deck: lens truss

Bridge Design structural types Structure below & above deck: irregular truss

Bridge Design structural types Structure below deck

Bridge Design structural types bridges Structure Below Deck

steel concrete composite

prefab concrete steel steel steel

prefab concrete prefab concrete prefab / on site concrete prefab concrete Prefab Concrete Decks

concrete + polystyrene infill on site + high strenght concrete concrete type tbd TOELICHTINGTOELICHTINGTOELICHTING - OP- DEZEOP- OPDEZE TEKENING DEZE TEKENING TEKENING IS HET IS HETISAUTEURSRECHT HET AUTEURSRECHT AUTEURSRECHT VAN VANTOEPASSING: VAN TOEPASSING: TOEPASSING: COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT IPV DELFTIPV IPV DELFT DELFT - DEZE- DEZE -TEKENING DEZE TEKENING TEKENING KAN KANNIET KAN NIETWORDEN NIET WORDEN WORDEN GEBRUIKT GEBRUIKT GEBRUIKT ALS ALSPRODUCTIETEKENING ALS PRODUCTIETEKENING PRODUCTIETEKENING - PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN- PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN- PRODUCTIETEKENINGEN DIENEN DIENEN DIENENVOOR VOOR UITVOERINGVOOR UITVOERING UITVOERING TER TERCONTROLE TER CONTROLE CONTROLE TE TE TE WORDEN WORDEN WORDEN VOORGELEGD VOORGELEGD VOORGELEGD AAN AANIPV AAN DELFTIPV IPV DELFT DELFT

DSAFKFJK;LJ;LAKJFASDDSAFKFJK;LJ;LAKJFASDDSAFKFJK;LJ;LAKJFASD - ALLE- ALLE -MATEN ALLE MATEN MATENIN MILLIMETERS, IN MILLIMETERS,IN MILLIMETERS, TENZIJ TENZIJ TENZIJANDERS ANDERS ANDERS VERMELD VERMELD VERMELD ASDLFKSAKJFH;SADFASDLFKSAKJFH;SADFASDLFKSAKJFH;SADF - PEILMATEN- PEILMATEN- PEILMATEN IN METERS IN METERSIN METERS T.O.V. T.O.V. N.A.P.T.O.V. N.A.P. N.A.P. \A'S;LDFKJLAKSFJLASDF\A'S;LDFKJLAKSFJLASDF\A'S;LDFKJLAKSFJLASDF - GRADEN- GRADEN- GRADEN IN HET IN HETIN360 HET GRADEN360 360 GRADEN GRADEN STELSEL STELSEL STELSEL ASF;KASLFJASDFASF;KASLFJASDFASF;KASLFJASDF - COORDINATEN- COORDINATEN- COORDINATEN IN MILLIMETERS IN MILLIMETERSIN MILLIMETERS IN HET IN HETINRD-STELSEL HET RD-STELSEL RD-STELSEL

PROJECTPROJECTPROJECT IPV.00IPV.00IPV.00 PROJECTNAAM PROJECTNAAM PROJECTNAAM 33 3333 17 1717 OPDRACHTGEVEROPDRACHTGEVEROPDRACHTGEVER 73 7373 GEMEENTEGEMEENTEGEMEENTE X X X ONDERDEELONDERDEELONDERDEEL PLATTEGRONDPLATTEGRONDPLATTEGROND TEKENINGNUMMERTEKENINGNUMMERTEKENINGNUMMER DATUMDATUMDATUM VERSIEVERSIEVERSIESTATUSSTATUSSTATUS IPV.00.VO.TEK.01IPV.00.VO.TEK.01IPV.00.VO.TEK.01DD.MM.JJJJDD.MM.JJJJDD.MM.JJJJ0.9 0.90.9 CONCEPTCONCEPTCONCEPT GETEKENDGETEKENDGETEKEND SCHAALSCHAALSCHAAL EENHEIDEENHEIDEENHEIDFORMAATFORMAATFORMAAT LANGSDOORSNEDELANGSDOORSNEDELANGSDOORSNEDE INITIALENINITIALENINITIALEN 1:1001:1001:100 MMMMMM A3 A3(420x297)A3 (420x297) (420x297) SCHAALSCHAALSCHAAL 1:100 1:100 1:100 Bridge Design structure below deck - materials

OudeOude DelftOude Delft 39 Delft 39 392611 2611 BB 2611 Delft BB BBDelft Delft 015 015750 015 75025 75075 25 2575 75 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

C:\projecten\Australie 2017\Conference\PresentatieC:\projecten\Australie Design of 2017\Conference\PresentatieFootbridges\AUS_CONFERENCE_2017_AK_IPVDELFT_PRES-FOOTBRIDGE_DESIGNC:\projecten\Australie 2017\Conference\Presentatie Design of Footbridges\AUS_CONFERENCE_2017_AK_IPVDELFT_PRES-FOOTBRIDGE_DESIGN Design of Footbridges\AUS_CONFERENCE_2017_AK_IPVDELFT_PRES-FOOTBRIDGE_DESIGN-18 Folder\Links\ddoorsneden prefqb betonne-18 Folder\Links\ddoorsneden dekken.dwg -18 Folder\Links\ddoorsneden prefqb betonne dekken.dwg prefqb betonne dekken.dwg Prefab Concrete Girders with custom edges

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Prefab Concrete Girders with custom edges

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Wooden structure

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Composite structure

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Composite structure

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Steel structure with steel trough deck

Bridge Design structure below deck - materials Integration of functionality

Structure Design Integration of traffic lights, lighting and signage Integration of functionality

Bridge Design bench as technical space 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

H H

G G

F F

675 B A

E E

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 1 1 2 1

0 H H

6

1

1

0 4 D 5 D

G G

1150 B 2800 A B-B ( 1 : 10 ) A-A ( 1 : 10 ) Integration of functionality - bench asF technical space F C Hydraulische unit Elektrakast C

A B 5 7 6

E E

0

6

1 1

B B

0 4 D 5 D

Amerikaanse projectie Schaal Datum 2-8-2013 Formaat: Opmerkingen:

Getekend wdk Order A1 Maateenheid mm Gecontroleerd A 0 0 8 2 B 0 5 1 1 Lineaire maat: < 30 30 < - < 300 300 < - < 2000 2000 < - < 4000 > 4000 Tenzij anders ) 0 1 : 1 ( B - B aangegeven: ) 0 1 : 1 ( A - A Maattolerantie: +/- 0,3 +/- 0,5 +/- 1 +/- 2 +/- 3 12,5 Hydraulics Electrics Hydraulics Benaming: Voorstel Bank Tekening- /Ordernummer - Blad: Revisie: C Console t s a k a r t k e l E t i n u e h c s i l u a r d y H C 60.130653-100 0 Fietsbrug KW1 te Assen BAM Blad 1 van 1 A Deze tekening blijft ons eigendom en mag zonder onze A M schriftelijke toestemming niet worden gecopieerd, Stockhaolmcstrhaat i5nefaTbelerfoioen: 0k50- 31R8187u7 sthoven Bridge Design bench as technical space Postbus 5144 Fax: 050-3124120 noch aan derden worden verstrekt, of ter inzage worden gegeven. 9700 GC Groningen E-mail: [email protected] 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 K:\Projecten 2013\B\BAM\60130653 Brug Kw 1 Assen\Tekenwerk\60.130653-100 Voorstel Bank.idw

B B

: n e g n i k r e m p O : t a a m r o F 3 1 0 2 - 8 - 2 m u t a D l a a h c S e i t c e j o r p e s n a a k i r e m A

1 A r e d r O k d w d n e k e t e G d r e e l o r t n o c e G m m d i e h n e e t a a M s r e d n a j i z n e T 0 0 0 4 > 0 0 0 4 < - < 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 < - < 0 0 3 0 0 3 < - < 0 3 0 3 < : t a a m e r i a e n i L : n e v e g e g n a a 5 , 2 1 3 - / + 2 - / + 1 - / + 5 , 0 - / + 3 , 0 - / + : e i t n a r e l o t t a a M : e i s i v e R : d a l B - r e m m u n r e d r O / - g n i n e k e T k n a B l e t s r o o V : g n i m a n e B 0 0 0 1 - 3 5 6 0 3 1 . 0 6 e l o s n o C 1 n a v 1 d a l B M A B n e s s A e t 1 W K g u r b s t e i F A e z n o r e d n o z g a m n e m o d n e g i e s n o t f j i l b g n i n e k e t e z e D A , d r e e i p o c e g n e d r o w t e i n g n i m m e t s e o t e k j i l e t f i r h c s M n e v o h t s 7 u 7 8 1 8 R 1 3 - 0 5 k 0 : n e o i o f r e l e b T a f e n 5 i t a a h r t s c m l o a h k c o t S . n e v e g e g n e d r o w e g a z n i r e t f o , t k e r t s r e v n e d r o w n e d r e d n a a h c o n 0 2 1 4 2 1 3 - 0 5 0 : x a F 4 4 1 5 s u b t s o P m o c . n e v o h t s u r @ n e v o h t s u r : l i a m - E n e g n i n o r G C G 0 0 7 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 1 1 2 1 w d i . k n a B l e t s r o o V 0 0 1 - 3 5 6 0 3 1 . 0 6 \ k r e w n e k e T \ n e s s A 1 w K g u r B 3 5 6 0 3 1 0 6 \ M A B \ B \ 3 1 0 2 n e t c e j o r P \ : K Integration of functionality

Poem for the Integrated waiting users • traffic signs • lighting • barriers

Bridge Design integration of poem, signs, lighting and barriers Integration of functionality Facts & Figures • length 15 m • width 4 m • costs: approx. €900.000 Integrated incl. excavation new canal & embankments • traffic signs • clearance width 8 m • lighting • barriers

Assen simple movable bridge with bench as technical space A Thorough Analysis

Traffic Network Why Analysis of Context Requirements Users For Whom

Design Checklist

Alignment Design Bridge Design Development Budget What

Dutch Design Manual Create Understanding Between representatives of Technical & Social requirements

City Immerse yourself in the Officials Requirements of other (social) Stakeholders and we should become the Hub we try !

we try Design(er) do ! (technical) (social) (City) Citizens Engineers Advocates can’t we ? we try (technical) (social)

Dutch Design Manual Start with the Crossings

Because Crossings are: A • Hard to Integrate • Hard to Upgrade • Advertisers / Kickstarters • Gapclosers

B

Dutch Design Manual Contextual Benefits

• Lowering intersection for comfortable ramps

Eindhoven Hovenring benefits from the context Contextual Benefits

• Casting bridge deck directly on existing earth dam • Using in soil casted piles

Breda Werkdonken bridge benefits from the context Think Modular !

• Economies of Scale by repeating parts

prefab deck 1 pier type

Enschede Bridge Modular Construction Think Filter !

• Signage portals as high traffic filter

Collision Loads Anti-Collision Portals - Cost-saving Filters Think Filter !

Users Unauthorized vehicle loads - use a filter Seek Integration ! custom aluminium extrusion profile

LED deck lighting fixation point LED facial lighting

Lighting Design Custom Handrail with Integrated Lighting Seek Integration !

Users Not intended visitors (Latin American mayor delegation 2017) Seek Integration !

Integral Design Integration of traffic lights, lighting and signage Seek Integration !

Integral Design Integration of gantry & footbridge Tender Smart: Develop Client Side what you know best !

Budget Tender & Contract format Conclusions To develop bridges that satify all involved and their requirements:

• Analyse requirements thouroughly Traffic Network BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUAL FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES BRIEF DUTCH • Involve all from the start BRIEF DUTCH DESIGN MANUALContext DESIGN MANUAL FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES

Analyse FOR BICYCLE

As one of the Netherland’s main bridge design offices, ipv Delft has focused on designing bicycle and pedestrian bridges for two decades. The company has used AND PEDESTRIAN • Create understanding & openess their extensive experience in bridge design to write this publication. This design manual focuses on the fundamentals of bridge design, answering practical questions regardign issues such as bridge width and slopes. ItUsers also lists the things that should BRIDGES by ipv Delft be taken into account before starting on the actual design and it offers insight in the Dutch regulations regarding loads and collision forces. General advice on cost re- duction is also included and several of the company’s projects are shown to illustrate the theoretical contents. The Brief Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian • Start with the crossings Bridges therefore is a vital source of both practical information and bridge design inspiration.

This publication is an English summary of the Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridges, which wasDesign published by CROW in 2014 andChecklist written by ipv Delft.

www.ipvdelft.com • Seek - Modularity www.crow.nl ipv Delft creative engineers +31 15 750 25 75 - Contextual Benefits [email protected] Alignment - Filters Design Bridge Design in cooperation with - Integration & Optimization Budget • Outsource Only what you can’t do yourself Free Download: ipvdelft.com / publications

- Be open to practical custom new solutions. - Bridges are almost never standard solutions. Thanks for your Attention ! - A custom solution can be best and cheapest.

Adriaan Kok ipv Delft creative engineers mail: [email protected] website: ipvdelft.nl or ipvdelft.com