DOCSLIB.ORG

Foster Stormwater Management Facility Environmental Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foster Stormwater Management Facility Environmental Study Report Final Draft Report Foster Stormwater Management Facility Environmental Study Report Prepared for City of Ottawa August 2013 1101 Prince of Wales Drive Suite 330 Ottawa, ON K2C 3W7 COPYRIGHT 2013 BY CH2M HILL • COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL Contents Section Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1-2 2. Municipal Class EA Planning Process .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Ontario Environmental Assessment Act .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Municipal Class EA Process .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Municipal Class EA Schedule ........................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................................... 2-4 3. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Study Area........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Jock River Reach One Subwatershed Study ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.4 Geomorphology ............................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.5 Hydrology and Hydraulics ................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.6 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment ......................................................................................... 3-4 3.7 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.8 Archeology ....................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.9 Summary of Constraints and Opportunities .................................................................................... 3-6 4. Evaluation of SWM Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Preliminary Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Alternative Selection ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 5. Recommended Alternative .................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Proposed Foster SWM Facility ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Geotechnical Considerations .............................................................................................. 5-8 5.1.2 Phase 1 ESA Recommendations ......................................................................................... 5-9 5.1.3 Fish Habitat Recommendations .......................................................................................... 5-9 5.1.4 Additional Considerations ................................................................................................ 5-10 5.2 Existing Foster SWM Facility .......................................................................................................... 5-10 6. Consultation Program .......................................................................................................................... 6-1 7. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 7-1 8. References ........................................................................................................................................... 8-1 Appendixes A South Nepean Urban Area Master Servicing Study (1997) – Selected Excerpts B Jock River Reach One Subwatershed Study (2007) – Selected Excerpts C Geotechnical Report D Fluvial Geomorphology Report E Fish Habitat Assessment F Archaeological Assessment G Public Consultation 391871A104_WBG070413113303OTT III COPYRIGHT 2013 BY CH2M HILL • COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL CONTENTS, CONTINUED Section Page Tables 5-1 Foster Pond Water Quality Requirements, based on a Wet Pond with Enhanced 80% Long Term S.S. Removal .................................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5-2 Foster Pond Preliminary Design Details ........................................................................................................ 5-1 5-3 Foster Pond Diversion Structure Preliminary Details ................................................................................... 5-4 5-4 Foster Pond Outlet Control Structure Preliminary Details ........................................................................... 5-4 Figures 2-1 Overview of the Class Environmental Assessment Planning Process ........................................................... 2-2 3-1 Foster Drain Catchment Area ....................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-2 Proposed Foster SWM Facility Construction Constraints and Opportunities .............................................. 3-7 4-1 Proposed Foster SWM Facility Footprint Alternatives ................................................................................. 4-2 5-1 Proposed Foster SWM Facility Plan .............................................................................................................. 5-2 5-2 Proposed Foster SWM Facility Plan .............................................................................................................. 5-3 5-3a Foster Ditch XP-SWMM Model Photo Overlay ............................................................................................. 5-6 5-3b Foster Ditch XP-SWMM Model Photo Overlay ............................................................................................. 5-7 iv 391871A104_WBG070413113303OTT COPYRIGHT 2013 BY CH2M HILL • COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview The South Nepean Urban Area has been undergoing significant development and urbanization since the mid 1990s. To plan for this the former City of Nepean and the new City of Ottawa has undertaken planning studies to address how the subwatershed will be managed. Two studies that have addressed both Master Servicing and Subwatershed Planning were the South Nepean Urban Area Master Servicing Study – Environmental Study Report (J.L. Richards & Assoc. Ltd., 1997) and the Jock River Reach One Subwatershed Study (Stantec 2007). Both of these studies recommended a stormwater management (SWM) plan to address both the existing and future lands in the South Nepean Urban Area. CH2M HILL was retained by the City of Ottawa (City) to prepare a SWM plan consistent with recommendations from these previous studies. The project initially included both the Foster Ditch catchment area as well as the Kennedy-Burnett SWM Facility catchment area. Generally, the study area encompasses part of the Barrhaven Community north of the Jock River, west of Greenbank Road and east of Highway 416. The study is planned under Schedule C of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (October 2000, as amended in 2007 and 2011). A Notice of Study Commencement was published on July 24, 2009 and a Public Open House for the project was held on November 18, 2009. The project purpose, background, constraints and opportunities and a summary of ongoing supporting studies were provided. The two areas of proposed construction (i.e. Foster and Kennedy- Burnett SWM facilities) are discontinuous and the requirement for potential property acquisition is different, therefore they were separated in order for design and construction to proceed independently of each other if necessary. Since the November 18, 2009 Open House, the City has decided to advance the Foster SWM Facility independent of the Kennedy-Burnett Facility. As such, this report details the SWM plan for the Foster SWM Facility. 1.2 Background The South Nepean Urban Area Master Servicing Study (MSS) Environmental Study Report (J.L. Richards & Assoc. Ltd., 1997) recommended that an end-of-pipe SWM facility be constructed downstream of McKenna Casey Drive to service both the O’Keefe Drain and Foster Ditch catchment areas. The facility was intended to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NCAFA Constitution By-Laws, Rules & Regulations Page 2 of 70 Revision January 2020 DEFINITIONS to Be Added
    NATIONAL CAPITAL AMATEUR FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION BY-LAWS AND RULES AND REGULATIONS January 2020 Changes from the previous version are highlighted in yellow Table of Contents DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ................................................................................. 3 2 MEMBERSHIP .............................................................................................. 3 3 LEAGUE STRUCTURE ................................................................................. 6 4 EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS........................................................................... 10 5 ADVISORY GROUP .................................................................................... 11 6 MEETINGS .................................................................................................. 11 7 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION ................................................. 13 8 BY-LAWS AND REGULATIONS ................................................................ 13 9 FINANCES .................................................................................................. 14 10 BURSARIES ............................................................................................ 14 11 SANDY RUCKSTUHL VOLUNTEER OF THE YEAR AWARD ............... 15 12 VOLUNTEER SCREENING ..................................................................... 16 13 REMUNERATION ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Ottawa Transportation Committee
    City of Ottawa Transportation Committee Councillor Keith Egli Pictures Left: Main Street Renewal The $39 million Main Street Renewal Project began construction in 2015 after extensive consultations with the area’s businesses, residents, and community organizations. The project involved a renewal of the street’s infrastructure following the City’s complete street guidelines, aiming to link the street together as a unified corridor and create memorable places along it while recognizing and supporting the character of its communities. The infrastructure of Main Street has been renewed and revitalized, and now provides better options for walking, cycling, and transit use. Middle: Rideau Canal Crossing: The construction has started! 2 years of planned construction. Multi-use pedestrian and cyclist bridge over the Rideau Canal and Colonel By Drive Reduces distances between mid-town neighbourhoods Improves access to the City’s extensive network of pedestrian multi-use pathways and to Lansdowne Right: Mackenzie Cycle Track Officially opened on Friday May 19 2017. The track is bi-directional, similar to the cycle track along O’Connor Street, and runs along the east side of Mackenzie Avenue, from Rideau Street to Murray Street. Mackenzie Avenue remains a one-way, two-lane roadway, expanding to three lanes at the Rideau Street intersection. The cycle track is separated from road traffic on Mackenzie Avenue by a combination of curbs, a buffer area, and bollards in front of the U.S. Embassy.The cycle track was opened during Bike to Work Month and is part of a larger project that involved the resurfacing of Mackenzie Avenue and installation of security bollards in front of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Handbook 2
    1 Conservation Handbook 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Riversbend 5 1.2 The Jock River 5 1.3 The Riparian Forest 6 2. Wildlife of the Jock River 9 2.1 Species at risk 11 3. Protect the river 13 4. Protect the forest 15 5. Protect the wildlife 18 6. Important information 20 6.1 Additional information 21 4 5 1. Introduction 1.1 Riversbend 1.2 The Jock River Riversbend is a quiet residential enclave The Jock River is located south of Riversbend, located north of the Jock River. Residents of this and is a diverse aquatic ecosystem that provides community will be able to explore and experience habitat for a wide variety of animal and plant all that the Jock River has to offer, while also species. The Jock River headwaters are located having the opportunity to contribute to its in the Montague area of Lanark County. The river protection. This Homeowner’s Handbook provides flows through various communities in Lanark residents with information about the natural County including Beckwith and Franktown. Near features that exist near their community, while Ashton, the river turns east and flows towards also describing ways that they can act as good the City of Ottawa, passing through Richmond, stewards of the environment. Barrhaven, and Manotick. The Jock River is a 6 7 major tributary of the larger Rideau River, and make their home at the water’s edge. Lastly, the the two rivers meet about two kilometers east riparian forest helps to protect the river from of Riversbend.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Report Stage 3
    September 18, 2017 ORIGINAL REPORT Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment Jock River 1 Site (BhFw-121), Burnett Lands Lot 13, Concession 3 (Rideau Front) Nepean Township, Carleton County City of Ottawa, Ontario Licensee: Aaron Mior (P1077) PIF Number: P1077-0022-2016 Submitted to: Mr. Jim Burghout Claridge Homes Corporation 2001-210 Gladstone Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0Y6 Report Number: 1523044 Distribution: 1 e-copy - Claridge Homes Corporation REPORT 1 e-copy - Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 1 e-copy - Golder Associates Ltd. STAGE 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT BURNETT LANDS Executive Summary The Executive Summary highlights key points only; for complete information and findings, as well as the limitations, the reader should examine the complete report. Golder Associates Limited (Golder) was retained by Claridge Homes (South Nepean) Inc. (“Claridge”) to complete a Stage 3 archaeological assessment for the Jock River 1 site (BhFw-121) situated within the proposed development property located at 3370 Greenbank Road, adjacent to the Jock River, known as the Burnett Lands. The subject property is located within part of Lot 13, Concession 3 (Rideau Front), Nepean Township, Carleton County, City of Ottawa. Three prior archaeological investigations have been completed within 100 metres of the Stage 3 study area detailed in this report. These included the Stage 1 (Golder, 2015a) and Stage 2 (Golder, 2015b) assessments for the South Nepean Collector (SNC) project which was completed in 2015. These assessments did not identify any Indigenous cultural materials which could be related to the Jock River 1 site documented in this report. The third prior archaeological investigation been completed within 100 metres of the Stage 3 study area was the Stage 1 and 2 assessment for the entire Burnett Lands development property (Golder, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Water Rangers Guardians! This Year, with the Help of Great Lakes Guardian Program, We Transformed How Ontarians Interacted with Local Waterbodies
    Meet the Water Rangers Guardians! This year, with the help of Great Lakes Guardian program, we transformed how Ontarians interacted with local waterbodies. Funding provided by An innovative environmental non-profit From the tiniest creek to the biggest lake, Canada is known for its water. Yet average citizens do not realize how their livelihood is connected with their watershed. Even when they learn about beaches closing or fish dying, they do not feel there is anything they can or should do. Water Rangers empowers citizens to learn and take action on water conservation through our user-friendly web platform, water stewardship training, and water quality testkits. Founded in 2015 through Aquahacking, we’re a non- profit organization based in Ottawa aiming to make water science easy to understand. We deepen our impact by providing tools and training to understand, test and protect waterways. About this Funding provided by project Water Rangers Guardians conduct water quality tests, clean up garbage and naturalize shorelines in order to become guardians for their local lake, river or stream! The program engaged community groups over the year, and trained students during excursions. This project w funded by Ontario through the Great Lakes Guardian Fund. Our Theory of Change states that when people learn Temiskaming about, then test water, they are prompted to take action Guardians must be located in the to protect it (Learn --> Test --> Act). Through this grant, thanks to Government of Ontario’s Great Lakes Guardian St. Lawrence River Watershed Fund, we took community and youth groups through this journey by first introducing them to water health, teach- (Ontario side) X ing them how to test water and the value of collecting Sudbury Q baseline data over time, and then prompting them to AX Q K act by collecting bags of garbage and restoring a modi- North Bay QUEBEC fied shoreline by letting it go natural and planting native shrubs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report to Rapport Au: Transportation Committee Comité Des
    1 Report to Rapport au: Transportation Committee Comité des transports 6 September 2017 / 6 septembre 2017 Submitted on August 22, 2017 Soumis le 22 août 2017 Submitted by Soumis par: Vivi Chi, Manager / Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning / Planification des transports, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports (613) 580-2424 extension / poste 21877, [email protected] Contact Person Personne ressource: Steven Boyle, Senior Project Manager / Gestionnaire principal de projet, Transportation Policy and Networks / Réseaux et politique de transport 613-580-2424 extension / poste 26087, [email protected] Ward: BARRHAVEN (3); KNOXDALE- File Number: ACS2017-TSD-PLN-0012 MERIVALE (9) SUBJECT: Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study – Statement of Work; and the Jockvale Road Multi-Use Pathway Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study – Statement of Work OBJET: Étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire à l’avenue Woodroffe, au Transitway sud-ouest et au chemin Fallowfield – Énoncé des travaux; et étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire au sentier polyvalent du chemin Jockvale - Énoncé des travaux. 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee approve: 1. The Statement of Work for the Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in this report and detailed in Document 1; and, 2. The Statement of Work for the Jockvale Road Multi-Use Pathway Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in this report and detailed in Document 2. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comite des transports approuve : 1. L’énoncé des travaux pour l’étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire a l’avenue Woodroffe, au Transitway sud-ouest et au chemin Fallowfield, tel que décrit dans le présent rapport et comme l’explique en détail le document 1; et, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Des Espèces De Poisson En Péril
    Sheridans Rapids Arcol Lake Elm Hill Campbell's Creek Kellys Bay Caldwell Lake Otter Lake Purdons Lake McCullochs Mud Lake Bolton Creek DeSalvos Point Wilbur Meadows Wilsons Creek Purdon Conservation Area Arcol Bay Twentysix Lake Bottle Lake McIntyre Creek Long Swamp Port Elmsley Wilbur Upper Mud Lake Bacchus Island Sunday Lake Purdons Mud Lake Armstrongs Corners Tay River Marl Lake Palmerston Lake Dam Mississippi River Bells Corners Stanleys Hill Sawlog Bay Distribution des Barnes Island Fergusons Mud Lake Ferguson Lake Jamesville Mud Cut Whites Point Sunday Creek Beveridge Marsh Bacchus Marsh Roger Hill Grants Creek Antoine Lake McLarens Creek Bennett Lake Tay Canal Bacchus Mued Laske pèces de poisson en péril McDonalds Corners Tay Marsh Petty's Bay Gemmills Hill The Promontory Harper ¤£43 Perth Beveridge Bay £509 Cranberry Creek Lake Fairholme Park Jebbs Creek Lower Rideau Lake ¤ Perth Dam BeveridgeS Ltuoacrktss Point Deep Bay Turcott Lake Rideau Valley Stewarts Hill Rideau Canal Big Point Gravel Point Kelford Lake Long Sault Creek Mosquito Creek Dalhousie Lake Rideau Ferry Yacht Club Conservation Area Conservation Authority Ompah Trombleys Lake Barbers Lake Donaldson Hydro Hill Conlon Island (Map 1 of 4) Chain Lakes Little Antoine Creek High Falls Generating Station Pauls Creek Coutts Bay Glen Tay Miller's Bay Antoine Creek Antoine Creek Thompsons Bay McIntyre Creek Thoms Mud Lake Rideau Ferry Bartlett Bay Palmerston Lake Adams Hill Tay River Mile Point McLeans Bay Madawaska Highlands Doctor Lake Big Rideau Lake Lombardy Smiths
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT and TREE CONSERVATION REPORT
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT and TREE CONSERVATION REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT and GOLF COURSE RELOCATION PART of LOTS 7 and 8, CONCESSION IV GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP of GOULBOURN CITY of OTTAWA RIVERBEND GOLF COURSE A report prepared for: Riverbend Golf and Country Club by Muncaster Environmental Planning Inc. November, 2009 MUNCASTER ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 1.1 Scoping the Environmental Impact Statement .........................................................4 2.0 METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................................................5 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................5 3.1 Terrestrial Features ..................................................................................................5 3.1.1 Jock River and Dowdall Riparian Corridors ................................................6 3.1.2 Other Terrestrial Features ............................................................................6 3.2 Aquatic Features ....................................................................................................14 3.2.1 Jock River ..................................................................................................14 3.2.2 Dowdall Municipal Drain ..........................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Jock River Subwatershed
    JOCK RIVER Lorem ipsum Subwatershed Report 2016 A report on the environmental health of the Jock River 1 Length of River Welcome to the 66 kilometres Length of Tributaries Jock River Subwatershed 888 kilometres Catchment Areas • Flowing Creek The Rideau — 50 km2 Watershed • Hobbs Drain — 32 km2 • Jenkinson Drain — 23 km2 • Jock River – Ashton-Dwyer Hill — 81 km2 • Jock River – Barrhaven — 31 km2 • Jock River – Franktown — 79 km2 watershed is an area of land that drains to a river, • Jock River – Leamy Creek lake or stream. In the Rideau Watershed, there are six — 20 km2 A major subwatersheds: Jock River, Kemptville Creek, • Jock River – Richmond Lower Rideau, Middle Rideau, Rideau Lakes and Tay River. — 31 km2 • Jock River – Richmond Fen This report looks at the Jock River Subwatershed. The Jock River — 26 km2 flows from headwater wetlands in Beckwith and Montague • Kings Creek Townships near Franktown, through the rich agricultural lands — 91 km2 in the former municipalities of Goulbourn and Nepean, • Monahan Drain and finally, through Barrhaven in Ottawa’s South Urban — 45 km2 Community to the Rideau River just north of Manotick where • Nichols Creek it connects to the Lower Rideau Subwatershed. — 47 km2 In 2011, the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) Total drainage area released the Jock River Subwatershed Report 2010. The report 556 km2 summarized the health of the Jock River Subwatershed looking at four key indicators: forest cover, wetlands, shoreline vegetation RVCA and Rideau and surface water quality. That report showed mixed results. In Valley Conservation the lower reaches of the Jock River, the more urbanized and Foundation Lands intensively farmed areas were showing the effects of changes to • Brown — 0.8 ha the natural landscape, whereas in the middle to upper reaches, What We Monitor and Why? • Fine — 40.4 ha forests, wetlands and watercourses were generally numerous The RVCA’s goal is for clean water, healthy shorelines and sustainable • Richmond Weir — 0.2 ha and well connected.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Henrys Corner Pleasant Corners Ile a Roussin Coins Gratton Blue Corners Distribution of Fish Petite ile Seche Vankleek Hill StatiHoanppy Hollow Trans-Canada HighwayVoyageur Route Lac Georges Ruisseau du Lac Georges Ritchance Caledonia FronMt cAlpine Little Rideau Creek Species at Risk Ruisseau du Lac Georges Vankleek Hill Golden Hill Treadwell South Nation Caledonia Springs Grande-Presqu'ile Alfred Conservation Authority Hawkesbury Creek Ile Chenier Aberdeen (Map 1 of 4) Windsor Bay Mill Creek Ruisseau Groulx Ruisseau Charbonneau Baie des Chenier Ruisseau des Atocas Senecal Alfred Station South Nation River Horse Creek Riviere des OutaouOaitstawa River Jessups Falls Horse Creek Ile du Fer-a-Cheval Jessup's Falls Conservation Area Cunningham Bay Parker Island Plantagenet Voyageur Route Lochinvar Drain Trans-Canada Highway Clarence Island Lochinvar Fox Point The Rollway Routhier D.B. Chisholm Drain Plantagenet Station Riviere des OutaouOaitstawa River Alfred Bog Fenaghvale Centrefield Proulx Clarence St-Bernardin Caledonia Creek Orient Rigaud River Curran Sandown Blais Creek Dickinson Creek Rockdale Rockland EaCsltarence Creek Kirkhill McCrimmon Dickinson Creek Caledonia Creek Paxton Creek Rockland Black Creek St-Amour Paxton Creek Pine Grove Morrison Drain Harris Creek Ruisseau Lafontaine Glenburn Fournier Gariepy Marsh Pendleton Airfield Springbrook Creek Baie Lafontaine Cobbs Lake CreeSkt-Pascal Laggan Voyageur Route SOUTH NATION RIVERScotch River Franklins Corners Riviere des OutaouOaitstawa River Crystal Spring Creek
    [Show full text]