Community Composition of Elasmobranch Fishes Utilizing Intertidal Sand Flats in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Community Composition of Elasmobranch Fishes Utilizing Intertidal Sand Flats in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia1 Simon J. Pierce,2,3 Tracey B. Scott-Holland,2 and Michael B. Bennett 2 Abstract: Thirteen elasmobranch species were collected during a 4-yr survey of the intertidal margins of Moreton Bay, a large subtropical embayment in south- eastern Queensland, Australia. Stingrays were the most common large predators in the intertidal zone, with total catch dominated numerically by blue-spotted maskray, Neotrygon kuhlii (53.8%); estuary stingray, Dasyatis fluviorum (22.2%); and brown whipray, Himantura toshi (10.2%). There was a significant female bias within intertidal populations of N. kuhlii and D. fluviorum. Courtship behaviors were observed in July and September in D. fluviorum and in January for white- spotted eagle ray, Aetobatus narinari. Dasyatis fluviorum, a threatened Australian endemic stingray, remains locally abundant within the bay. Overall, the inshore elasmobranch fauna of Moreton Bay is relatively species rich compared with similar studies elsewhere in Australia, emphasizing the regional importance of this ecosystem. Moreton Bay is a large (1,523 km2) sub- tively abundant marine mammal fauna (Chil- tropical embayment on the east coast of Aus- vers et al. 2005) and at least 750 fish species tralia. The bay is surrounded by the fast- ( Johnson 1999). The area is also an interna- growing southeastern Queensland urban tionally recognized Ramsar-listed wetland for region, home to over 2.8 million residents in migratory shorebird species (Thompson 2006 (EPA 2008a). Increasing population 1993, EPA 2008b). density has led to intensive land use and asso- Shark and ray populations can be rapidly ciated nutrient runoff, resulting in a serious depleted by anthropogenic pressures (Stevens degradation in water quality in river estuaries et al. 2000, Fowler et al. 2005), and a high and western Moreton Bay (Dennison and abundance of these large predatory fishes is Abal 1999). The bay is also heavily used for increasingly held to be indicative of a healthy recreation and commercial activities includ- ecosystem (Friedlander and DeMartini 2002, ing major commercial and recreational fish- Robbins et al. 2006, Stevenson et al. 2007). eries, shipping, boating, and marine tourism Although much of the bay retains a high bio- ( Johnson 1999, EPA 2008a). However, de- logical diversity, and no major loss of species spite high anthropogenic pressure, Moreton is known to have occurred (Dennison and Bay continues to support a diverse and rela- Abal 1999, Chilvers et al. 2005), analysis of historical data sets has suggested that popula- tions of large marine carnivores have declined 1 This research was funded by grants from The Uni- since the beginning of large-scale settlement versity of Queensland and the Tangalooma Marine Edu- ( Jackson et al. 2001, Pandolfi et al. 2003, cation and Research Foundation. Manuscript accepted 4 L otze et al. 2006). One elasmobranch species July 2010. that was previously known from the bay, the 2 School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. green sawfish, Pristis zijsron, has not been 3 Corresponding author (e-mail: simonjpierce@ r ecorded locally since the 1960s ( Johnson gmail.com). 1999), and anecdotal observations suggest that estuary stingray, Dasyatis fluviorum, have also declined (Kyne et al. 2003). Pacific Science (2011), vol. 65, no. 2:235 – 247 A lack of baseline information on the habi- doi: 10.2984/65.2.235 © 2011 by University of Hawai‘i Press tat preferences, abundance, and biology of All rights reserved elasmobranchs hampers the management of 235 236 PACIFIC SCIENCE · April 2011 this group in inshore ecosystems such as sites in that area to confirm elasmobranch Moreton Bay. Basic information on species presence and to select appropriate collection composition and abundance in the region is techniques, given that the species found in the scarce. Johnson (1999) compiled an annotated intertidal environment are predominantly ba- checklist of 52 elasmobranch species recorded toids. Four sites were selected for repeated from Moreton Bay and provided contempo- sampling based on their accessibility and the rary abundance estimates based on museum broadly similar sand- or mudflat habitats at records and field surveys. Batoids are often each location: (1) the northern Wanga Wal- underrepresented in conventional faunal sur- len Banks ( WWB) are centered on 27° 24.58′ veys because their dorsoventrally flattened S, 153° 26.21′ E and lie immediately south of bodies and relatively low movement rates the town of Amity on NSI; (2) One Mile Bay make them difficult to capture using static (OMB), 27° 29.68′ S, 153° 23.94′ E, is located sampling techniques ( White and Potter 8.1 km south of the Wanga Wallen Banks on 2004). However, stingrays play an important the west coast of NSI adjacent to the town of ecological role in soft-bottom ecosystems Dunwich; (3) Hays Inlet (HI), 27° 15.68′ S, ( VanBlaricom 1982, Thrush et al. 1991, 153° 4.58′ E, is a semi-enclosed embayment Heithaus 2004), and some species are highly on the northwestern side of Moreton Bay; (4) susceptible to population decline (Stobutzki the Wynnum Banks ( WB), 27° 25.11′ S, 153° et al. 2002). In this study we provide a focused 10.56′ E, are located adjacent to the Wynnum survey of the benthic elasmobranch species Creek mouth in the western bay. The two found in intertidal sand-flat habitats around former sites are located in the eastern bay, and the margins of the bay, their relative abun- the two latter sites are in the western bay. Op- dance and population structure, and evaluate portunistic samples were also collected from the importance of this environment to the similar habitats adjacent to these four main conservation and management of these fishes. sites. Details of sampling methods and periodic- materials and methods ity are provided in Pierce et al. (2009) and Table 1. Seine ( WWB, OMB, and HI) and Moreton Bay is contained within the broader tunnel nets ( WB) were fished over intertidal Moreton Bay Marine Park in southeastern flats in shallow (<1.5 m) water during early Queensland, Australia (centered on 27° 15′ S, morning or evening mid- to high tides. Pilot 153° 15′ E). The bay is bounded on the east studies found that catch rates of elasmo- by three sand islands: Moreton I., North branchs during daylight hours were low, and Stradbroke I. ( NSI), and South Stradbroke I. subsequently the majority of sampling effort Eastern Moreton Bay is subject to consider- took place in darkness. All nets covered the able oceanic input, promoting stable salinities entire water column. Because batoids did not and water temperature, and low levels of tur- usually enmesh in seine nets, they were cor- bidity (Dennison and Abal 1999, Johnson ralled into shallow water where the net could 1999). The western bay is characterized by be ringed-off, so that individual fish could be wide, shallow bays interspersed with head- captured with hand nets. lands and rivers, with these freshwater inputs All elasmobranchs were identified to spe- leading to variable salinity and turbidity cies level (Last and Stevens 2009). The rela- (Dennison and Abal 1999, Johnson 1999). tive abundance of each species in catches was Further descriptions of the habitats within the qualitatively assigned following the method of bay, including the intertidal regions, are pro- Johnson (1999): “rare” denotes one to four vided in Johnson (1999), Manson et al. (2003), specimens collected; “uncommon” indicates and Zharikov et al. (2005). five to nine individuals; “common” represents Sampling for this study occurred between 10 to 100 individuals; and “abundant” is used April 2002 and April 2006 in the middle re- where >100 individuals were caught. Species gions of Moreton Bay (see Figure 1). Prelimi- diversity at the three sites sampled regularly nary fieldwork was undertaken at a number of with seine nets ( WWB, OMB, and HI) was Elasmobranch Fishes in the Intertidal Zone · Pierce et al. 237 investigated using standard diversity indices results implemented in PRIMER-6 (Clarke and Gorley 2001, Clarke and Warwick 2001). Five hundred and twenty-one elasmobranchs Species richness, as measured simply by the were caught from the four primary study areas total number of species (S ), is often correlated (Figure 1, Table 1), with total catch from all with sampling effort; therefore Margalef ’s In- sites comprising 627 individuals from 13 spe- dex (d ) was used as a complementary measure cies and eight families (Table 2). Though to control for the total number of individuals sampling was not standardized for effort or caught at each site using the formula (S - 1)/ for examining temporal trends, there was log(N ), where N denotes the total number of o bservational evidence for decreased total individuals caught. Shannon (loge base; H′) catches at night during cooler months (May and Simpson (1 - λ) indices considered both to July) when water temperatures were gener- richness and evenness. The Shannon Index ally below 17°C. Neotrygon kuhlii was the most followed the formula - ∑(Pi*log(Pi)), where Pi common species at three of the four sites and is the proportion of individuals of a given spe- comprised 53.8% of the total catch numeri- cies. The Simpson Index was calculated by cally. Dasyatis fluviorum was the most abun- 1 - ∑(Ni*(Ni - 1))/N*(N - 1), where Ni is the dant large species (>5 kg body mass), consti- number of individuals of a given species. tuting 22.2% of total catch. Himantura toshi, Pielou’s Evenness Index ( J′) was used to as- as redescribed by Last et al. (2008), was also sess the equitability or relative abundance of common, comprising 10.2% of total catch.