A New Pheromone for Prionus Root-Boring Beetles Arthur M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
J Insect Behav (2012) 25:569–577 DOI 10.1007/s10905-012-9321-0 Role of Volatile Semiochemicals in the Host and Mate Location Behavior of Mallodon dasystomus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Matthew A. Paschen & Nathan M. Schiff & Matthew D. Ginzel Revised: 18 January 2012 /Accepted: 1 March 2012 / Published online: 16 March 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract Little is known of the role semiochemicals play in the mating systems of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the primitive subfamily Prioninae. Mallodon dasystomus (Say), the hardwood stump borer, is a widely distributed prionine native to the southern US. Preferred hosts of M. dasystomus include oak, sweetgum, sugarberry and hackberry; although they also colonize a variety of other hardwoods. Here, we study the mate location behavior of M. dasystomus by testing the hypotheses that the sexes are mutually attracted to volatiles emanating from the larval host and that females release a volatile pheromone that is attractive to males alone. In a Y-tube olfactometer, male and female M. dasystomus responded to volatiles from host material (i.e., sweetgum and sugarberry). However, only males responded to females in the olfactometer, suggesting that females release a volatile sex pheromone. In choice experiments conducted in a greenhouse, we determined that both males and females prefer host over non-host material. In further bioassays in the greenhouse, males chose host material containing a live female over that containing a live male or host material alone. These findings are further evidence of the critical role host volatiles and pheromones play in mating systems of longhorned beetles. -
A New Species of Derobrachus Audinet-Serville, 1832 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Prioninae) from a Cloud Forest in Honduras
Zootaxa 4422 (3): 395–402 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4422.3.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:066252ED-DE7E-4191-A03C-822F24455280 A new species of Derobrachus Audinet-Serville, 1832 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Prioninae) from a cloud forest in Honduras ANTONIO SANTOS-SILVA1, NOËL MAL2, MARTIJN VAN ROIE3, 4 & MERLIJN JOCQUÉ2,3,5,6 1Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium 3Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation npo (BINCO), Walmersumstraat 44, 3380 Glabbeek, Belgium 4Department of Biology, Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium 5Operation Wallacea, Wallace House, Old Bolingbroke, Lincolnshire, PE23 4EX, UK. 6Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A yearly biodiversity monitoring of longhorned beetles (Cerambycidae) in a Honduran cloud forest revealed a new species of prionine. Derobrachus cusucoensis sp. nov. is a locally relatively common species described from Cusuco National Park in Honduras, becoming the ninth species of this genus recorded for the country. Similar both in morphology and a montane habitat to D. dohrni, there is a possibility that this new species represents a disconnected population from the latter that evolved separately. An adapted insert for an existing identification key to all Derobrachus species is included. Key words: Central America, key, longhorned beetle, taxonomy, Cusuco National Park Introduction The Honduran landscape is characterized by mountains topped by cloud forest. -
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use. -
Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Prioninae)
Volume 46(10):129‑134, 2015 A NEW SPECIES OF PHYSOPLEURUS LACORDAIRE FROM FRENCH GUIANA (COLEOPTERA, CERAMBYCIDAE, PRIONINAE) NORBERT DElaHAYE1 GÉRARD LUC TAVAKILIAN2 ABSTRACT Misidentified as Physopleurus crassidens (Bates, 1869) since the beginning of the 20th cen- tury by some authors, a new species from French Guiana is herein described: Physopleurus ubirajarai sp. nov. Key-Words: Coleoptera; Cerambycidae; Prioninae; Macrotomini; Physopleurus; Taxon- omy; South America. INTRODUCTION Physopleurus dohrnii Lacordaire, 1869, from Venezu- ela; The systematic history of the genus Physopleu- Physopleurus erikae Santos-Silva & Martins, 2009, rus Lacordaire, 1869 was perfectly processed in 2003 from Colombia; by Santos-Silva & Martins, who described two new Physopleurus exiguus Santos-Silva & Martins, 2003, species, and listed 10 species in the genus. In 2005, from Bolivia and Brazil; the number of species was reduced to nine, because Physopleurus longiscapus Lameere, 1912, from Bolivia, of the description of the genus Hisarai Santos-Silva & Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Brazil; Martins, with Physopleurus seripierriae Santos-Silva & Physopleurus maillei (Audinet-Serville, 1832), from Martins, 2003 as type species. Two new species were Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina; described in 2006 and 2009, respectively P. rafaeli Physopleurus rafaeli Santos-Silva, 2006, from Brazil; Santos-Silva, from Brazil, and P. erikae Santos-Silva Physopleurus rugosus (Gahan, 1894); from French & Martins, from Colombia. Chalumeau (2010) de- Guiana and Brazil; scribed P. swifti, synonymized in the same year with Physopleurus ubirajarai sp. nov., from French Guiana; P. rugosus (Gahan, 1894) by Tavakilian (2010). Physopleurus tritomicros Lameere, 1912, from French Currently, the genus Physopleurus includes 12 Guiana and Brazil; species (the new species included): Physopleurus villardi (Lameere, 1902), from Guate- mala, Ecuador, and Peru. -
Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity
Biodiversity and Coarse woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA - October 18-20,1993 Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workhop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA October 18-20,1993 Editors: James W. McMinn, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA, and D.A. Crossley, Jr., University of Georgia, Athens, GA Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Site, and the USDA Forest Service, Savannah River Forest Station, Biodiversity Program, Aiken, SC Conducted by: USDA Forest Service, Southem Research Station, Asheville, NC, and University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, GA Preface James W. McMinn and D. A. Crossley, Jr. Conservation of biodiversity is emerging as a major goal in The effects of CWD on biodiversity depend upon the management of forest ecosystems. The implied harvesting variables, distribution, and dynamics. This objective is the conservation of a full complement of native proceedings addresses the current state of knowledge about species and communities within the forest ecosystem. the influences of CWD on the biodiversity of various Effective implementation of conservation measures will groups of biota. Research priorities are identified for future require a broader knowledge of the dimensions of studies that should provide a basis for the conservation of biodiversity, the contributions of various ecosystem biodiversity when interacting with appropriate management components to those dimensions, and the impact of techniques. management practices. We thank John Blake, USDA Forest Service, Savannah In a workshop held in Athens, GA, October 18-20, 1993, River Forest Station, for encouragement and support we focused on an ecosystem component, coarse woody throughout the workshop process. -
Cerambycidae of Tennessee
Cerambycidae of Tennessee! Disteniinae: Disteniini! Parandrinae: Parandriini! Closed circles represent previously published county records, museum specimen records, and specimens examined. Open circles are county records reported in Jamerson (1973) for which a specimen could not be located. Future collections are needed to substantiate these accounts. Fig. 2. Elytrimitatrix (Elytrimitatrix) undata (F.)! Fig. 3. Neandra brunnea (F.)! Prioninae: Macrotomini! Prioninae: Meroscheliscini! Fig. 4. Archodontes melanoplus melanoplus (L.)! Fig. 5. Mallodon dasystomus dasystomus Say! Fig. 6. Tragosoma harrisii (LeConte)! Prioninae: Prionini! Fig. 7. Derobrachus brevicollis Audinet-Serville! Fig. 8. Orthosoma brunneum (Forster)! Fig. 9. Prionus (Neopolyarthron) imbricornis (L.)! Prioninae! : Solenopterini! Fig. 10. Prionus (Prionus) laticollis (Drury) ! Fig. 11. Prionus (Prionus) pocularis Dalman ! Fig. 12. Sphenosethus taslei (Buquet) ! Necydalinae: Necydalini! Spondylidinae: Asemini! Fig. 13. Necydalis melitta (Say)! Fig. 14. Arhopalus foveicollis (Haldeman)! Fig. 15. Arhopalus rusticus obsoletus (Randall)! ! ! Suppl. Figs. 2-15. Tennessee county collection localities for longhorned beetle (Cerambycidae) species: Disteniinae, Parandrinae, Prioninae, Necydalinae, Spondylinae: Asemini (in part). ! Spondylidinae: Asemini (ctd.)! Fig. 16. Asemum striatum (L.)! Fig. 17. Tetropium schwarzianum Casey! Fig. 18. Atimia confusa confusa (Say)! ! Spondylidinae: Saphanini! Lepturinae: Desmocerini! Lepturinae: Encyclopini! Fig. 19. Michthisoma heterodoxum LeConte -
A Synopsis of Turkish Vesperinae Mulsant, 1839 and Prioninae Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
402 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 2, June 2009__________ A SYNOPSIS OF TURKISH VESPERINAE MULSANT, 1839 AND PRIONINAE LATREILLE, 1802 (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) Hüseyin Özdikmen* and Semra Turgut* * Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, 06500 Ankara / Türkiye. E- mails: [email protected] and [email protected] [Özdikmen, H. & Turgut, S. 2009. A synopsis of Turkish Vesperinae Mulsant, 1839 and Prioninae Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology 4 (2): 402-423] ABSTRACT: All taxa of the subfamilies Vesperinae Mulsant, 1839 and Prioninae Latreille, 1802 in Turkey are evaluated with zoogeographical remarks. The main aim of this work is to clarify current status of these subfamilies in Turkey. This work is the first attempt for this purpose. Some new faunistical data are given in the text. A key for Turkish Prioninae species is also given. KEY WORDS: Vesperinae, Prioninae, Cerambycidae, Coleoptera, Turkey. Turkish Vesperinae and Prioninae Subfamily VESPERINAE Mulsant, 1839 Tribe VESPERINI Mulsant, 1839 Genus VESPERUS Dejean, 1821 Vesperus ocularis Mulsant & Rey, 1863 Subfamily PRIONINAE Latreille, 1802 Tribe ERGATINI Fairmaire, 1864 Genus ERGATES Serville, 1832 Ergates faber (Linnaeus, 1761) Genus CALLERGATES Lameere, 1906 Callergates akbesianus (Pic, 1900) Callergates gaillardoti (Chevrolat, 1854) Tribe MACROTOMINI Thomson, 1860 Genus PRINOBIUS Mulsant, 1842 Prinobius myardi Mulsant, 1842 Tribe RHAPHIPODINI Lameere, 1912 Genus RHAESUS Motschulsky, 1875 Rhaesus serricollis (Motschulsky, 1838) Tribe AEGOSOMATINI Thomson, 1860 Genus AEGOSOMA Serville, 1832 Aegosoma scabricorne (Scopoli, 1763) Tribe PRIONINI Latreille, 1804 Genus PRIONUS Geoffroy, 1762 Prionus coriarius (Linnaeus, 1758) Prionus komiyai Lorenc, 1999 Genus MESOPRIONUS Jakovlev, 1887 Mesoprionus batelkai (Sláma, 1996) Mesoprionus besicanus (Fairmaire, 1855) Mesoprionus lefebvrei (Marseul, 1856) Mesoprionus schaufussi (Jakovlev, 1887) _____________Mun. -
5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids
5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids Jocelyn G. Millar University of California Riverside, California Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 161 5.2 Use of Pheromones in Cerambycid Reproduction ....................................................................... 162 5.3 Volatile Pheromones from the Various Subfamilies .................................................................... 173 5.3.1 Subfamily Cerambycinae ................................................................................................ 173 5.3.2 Subfamily Lamiinae ........................................................................................................ 176 5.3.3 Subfamily Spondylidinae ................................................................................................ 178 5.3.4 Subfamily Prioninae ........................................................................................................ 178 5.3.5 Subfamily Lepturinae ...................................................................................................... 179 5.4 Contact Pheromones ..................................................................................................................... 179 5.5 Trail Pheromones ......................................................................................................................... 182 5.6 Mechanisms for -
A Check-List and Keys to the Primitive Sub-Families of Cerambycidae of Illinois
Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1967 A Check-list and Keys to the Primitive Sub-families of Cerambycidae of Illinois Michael Jon Corn Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Zoology at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Corn, Michael Jon, "A Check-list and Keys to the Primitive Sub-families of Cerambycidae of Illinois" (1967). Masters Theses. 2490. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2490 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECK-LIST AND KEYS TO THE PRIMITIVE SUBFAMILIES OF CEHAMBYCIDAE OF ILLINOIS (TITLE) BY MICHAEL JON CORN B.S. in Ed., Eastern Illinois University, 1966 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1967 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE 21 rl.\I\( l'i "1 PATE ADVISER DEPARTMENT HEAD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank Dr. Michael A. Goodrich for.his advice and guidance during the research and writing of this paper. The author is also indebted to the following curators of the various museums and private individuals from whom material was borrowed: Mr. John K. Bouseman; Dr. Rupert Wenzel and Dr. Henry Dybas, Field Museum ,...-._, of Natural History; Dr.'M. -
Species Richness and Phenology of Cerambycid Beetles in Urban Forest Fragments of Northern Delaware
ECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY Species Richness and Phenology of Cerambycid Beetles in Urban Forest Fragments of Northern Delaware 1 1,2 3 4 5 K. HANDLEY, J. HOUGH-GOLDSTEIN, L. M. HANKS, J. G. MILLAR, AND V. D’AMICO Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1–12 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/aesa/sav005 ABSTRACT Cerambycid beetles are abundant and diverse in forests, but much about their host rela- tionships and adult behavior remains unknown. Generic blends of synthetic pheromones were used as lures in traps, to assess the species richness, and phenology of cerambycids in forest fragments in north- ern Delaware. More than 15,000 cerambycid beetles of 69 species were trapped over 2 yr. Activity periods were similar to those found in previous studies, but many species were active 1–3 wk earlier in 2012 than in 2013, probably owing to warmer spring temperatures that year. In 2012, the blends were tested with and without ethanol, a host plant volatile produced by stressed trees. Of cerambycid species trapped in sufficient numbers for statistical analysis, ethanol synergized pheromone trap catches for seven species, but had no effect on attraction to pheromone for six species. One species was attracted only by ethanol. The generic pheromone blend, especially when combined with ethanol, was an effective tool for assessing the species richness and adult phenology of many cerambycid species, including nocturnal, crepuscular, and cryptic species that are otherwise difficult to find. KEY WORDS Cerambycidae, attractant, phenology, forest fragmentation Cerambycid beetles can be serious pests of forest trees long as those in Europe, almost half of the forests in the and wood products (Speight 1989, Solomon 1995). -
Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles
Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 109(6), 2016, 872–880 doi: 10.1093/aesa/saw055 Advance Access Publication Date: 6 August 2016 Ecology and Population Biology Research article Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles E. Dunn,1,2 J. Hough-Goldstein,1 L. M. Hanks,3 J. G. Millar,4 and V. D’Amico5 1Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716 ([email protected]; [email protected]), 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], 3Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Ave. MC-118, Urbana, IL 61801 ([email protected]), 4Department of Entomology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521 ([email protected]), and 5U. S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716 ([email protected]) Received 13 April 2016; Accepted 12 July 2016 Abstract Cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) can locate suitable hosts and mates by sensing pheromones and plant volatiles. Many cerambycid pheromone components have been identified and are now produced syn- thetically for trap lures. The range over which these lures attract cerambycids within a forest, and the tendency for cerambycids to move out of a forest in response to lures, have not been explored previously. We conducted two field experiments using baited and unbaited panel traps in northern Delaware to investigate these ques- tions. Within forest fragments, unbaited traps that were 2 m from a baited trap captured more beetles than unbaited control traps, suggesting increased cerambycid activity leading to more by-catch in unbaited traps at 2 m from the pheromone source. -
UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works
UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title Identification and Synthesis of a Female-Produced Sex Pheromone for the Cerambycid Beetle Prionus Californicus Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fq1z1wb Journal Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35(5) ISSN 1573-1561 Authors Rodstein, Joshua McElfresh, J. Steven Barbour, James D. et al. Publication Date 2009-05-01 DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9623-7 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California J Chem Ecol (2009) 35:590–600 DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9623-7 Identification and Synthesis of a Female-Produced Sex Pheromone for the Cerambycid Beetle Prionus californicus Joshua Rodstein & J. Steven McElfresh & James D. Barbour & Ann M. Ray & Lawrence M. Hanks & Jocelyn G. Millar Received: 15 December 2008 /Revised: 20 March 2009 /Accepted: 27 March 2009 /Published online: 25 April 2009 # The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Females of the large cerambycid beetle Prionus extracts also contained several other compounds that were californicus produce a powerful sex pheromone that attracts tentatively identified as chain-extended homologs of the main males. The pheromone was adsorbed on solid phase pheromone component. This pheromone should prove useful microextraction (SPME) fibers inserted into the ovipositor for sampling and management of the beetle, which is an sheath and analyzed by coupled gas chromatography- important pest of hops, and an occasional pest in a variety of electroantennogram detection and GC-mass spectrometry. orchard crops. Although this is the first female-produced The pheromone was identified as an isomer of 3,5- pheromone to be identified from the Cerambycidae, there is dimethyldodecanoic acid by a combination of retention index considerable evidence for pheromone production by females comparisons and mass spectral interpretation.