DOCSLIB.ORG

Regulations for the FIDE Online Olympiad 20 August – 15 September 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regulations for the FIDE Online Olympiad 20 August – 15 September 2021 Regulations for the FIDE Online Olympiad 20 August – 15 September 2021 1. Scope 1. 1. Governing Body of the FIDE Online Olympiad 2021 (hereinafter referred to as OLONLINE) is the International Chess Federation (FIDE). 1. 2. FIDE Global Strategy Commission (hereinafter referred to as GSC) is in charge for preparing regulations, communicating with the hosting Internet platform – Chess.com and the participating federations. 1. 3. The body responsible for adopting and changing these Regulations is the FIDE Council, upon recommendation by GSC. 1. 4. At any time, any circumstance or unforeseen situation not covered in these Regulations shall be referred to the FIDE President for a final decision. 2. Format 2. 1. OLONLINE is a team event. National teams of all federations affiliated to FIDE have the right to participate in OLONLINE. The Shenzhen Organiser is entitled to enter an additional team. 2. 2. Stage 1. DIVISIONS a) The registered teams (see Article 3.1) shall be ranked according to teams’ federations performance (FP) calculated by formula: FP = (BO + BW + OO) / n, where: BO – federation’s place in the open section of the FIDE Olympiad 2018 in Batumi, BW – federation’s place in the women’s section of the FIDE Olympiad 2018 in Batumi, OO – federation’s place in the FIDE Online Olympiad 2020 (Teams finishing in the same position in different pools of the same DIVISION are deemed to be tied), n – number the events mentioned above in which the federation took part. The lesser FP is, the higher a team is placed in the Federations Performance Ranking (hereinafter referred to as FPR). All the teams shall be divided into 4 divisions from DIVISION 4 to TOP DIVISION according to FPR. Any team may request to be placed in a lower DIVISION. Such a request needs to be approved by GSC. Shenzhen team shall be seeded into DIVISION 2. b) DIVISION 4 shall be composed of 60 registered teams (see Article 3.1) placed in the bottom part of FPR. The teams shall be divided into 5 pools (from A to E), 12 teams each, of approximately equal strength determined as the average rapid rating of six main players (as per Article 2.5) according to August 2021 FRL (hereinafter referred to as “equal strength”). Each pool shall play a round robin of 9 rounds. The top three teams of each pool shall qualify for DIVISION 3. c) DIVISION 3 shall be composed of 35 seeded registered teams (see Article 3.1) ranked higher than teams of DIVISION 4 in FPR and 15 teams qualified from DIVISION 4. 50 teams shall be divided into 5 pools (from A to E), 10 teams each, of approximately equal strength. Teams qualified from the same pool of DIVISION 4 shall preferably be placed in different pools. Pool winners of DIVISION 4 cannot be placed in the same pool. Each pool shall play a round robin of 9 rounds. The top three first teams of each pool shall qualify for DIVISION 2. d) DIVISION 2 shall be composed of 35 seeded registered teams (see Article 3.1) ranked higher than teams of DIVISION 3 in FPR and 15 teams qualified from DIVISION 3. 50 teams shall be divided into 5 pools (from A to E), 10 teams each, of approximately equal strength. Teams qualified from the same pool of DIVISION 3 shall preferably be placed in different pools. Pool winners of DIVISION 3 cannot be placed in the same pool. Each pool shall play a round robin of 9 rounds. The top three first teams of each pool shall qualify for TOP DIVISION. e) TOP DIVISION shall be composed of 25 seeded registered teams (see Article 3.1) placed on the top of FPR and 15 teams qualified from DIVISION 2. 40 teams shall be divided into 4 pools (from A to D), 10 teams each, of approximately equal strength. Teams qualified from the same pool of DIVISION 2 shall preferably be placed in different pools. Each pool shall play a round robin of 9 rounds. The top two teams of each pool shall qualify for Stage 2 – PLAY-OFF (see Article 2.3). f) Scoring system: match points. A win scores 2 points. A draw scores 1 point. A loss scores 0 points. g) The tie-break system is described in Annex II “Tie-break Rules”, Article 1. 2. 3. Stage 2. PLAY-OFF a) Eight teams qualified from Stage 1 play a knock-out tournament. b) Each duel consists of two matches. In the first match, the first-named team in a duel has white on the odd-numbered boards and black on the even-numbered boards in the first match; and white on the even-numbered boards and black on the odd-numbered boards in the second match. c) The pairings shall be done as follows: Quarter finals Duel I: Winner of Top DIVISION pool A vs Runner-up of Top DIVISION pool D Duel II: Runner-up of Top DIVISION pool C vs Winner of Top DIVISION pool B Duel III: Winner of Top DIVISION pool C vs Runner-up of Top DIVISION pool B Duel IV: Runner-up of Top DIVISION pool A vs Winner of Top DIVISION pool D Semi-finals Duel V: Winner of Duel II vs Winner of Duel I Duel VI: Winner of Duel IV vs Winner of Duel III Final Duel VII: Winner of Duel V vs Winner of Duel VI d) The tie-break system is described in Annex II “Tie-break Rules”, Article 2. 2. 4. All matches are played on six boards divided into four categories: A (open) - boards 1 and 2, B (women) - boards 3 and 4, C (open U-20) – board 5, D (girl U-20) – board 6. 2. 5. Each team consists of six main players, including: - at least 2 women - at least 1 player U-20 (born in 2001 or later), - at least 1 girl U-20 (born in 2001 or later) Each team has a team captain. Each team may have up to six reserves: 2 players in each of categories A and B and 1 player in each of categories C and D according to Article 2.4. 2. 6. Each team captain shall decide on his/her team composition for each match. In case of a substitution in category(- es) A or/and B, the remaining main player(s) play(s) on board 1 and/or 3, the reserve player(s) shall go to board 2 and/or 4 respectively. If both main players are substituted in category(-es) A or/and B, then reserve 1 in each category shall take the higher board (1 or/and 3). 2. 7. Team compositions for each match are required to be submitted by Chess-Results.com not later than 10 minutes before the beginning of the match. 2. 8. Time control: 15 minutes + 5 seconds increment per move, starting from move 1. 3. Registration 3. 1. Each federation (or another body authorized by GSC) intending to participate in OLONLINE shall confirm its participation providing the players’ list with the exact main boards and reserves order in all categories (see Article 2.5) to the FIDE Secretariat ([email protected]) by 31 July. Federations are allowed to change their submitted players’ list until 12 am UTC, 7 days before they are scheduled to play for the first time, after which their team composition shall be fixed. This means the deadlines are as follows: DIVISION 4 – Friday, 13 August 12 am UTC DIVISION 3 – Friday, 20 August 12 am UTC DIVISION 2 – Thursday, 26 August 12 am UTC Top DIVISION – Wednesday, 1 September 12 am UTC Providing the players’ list, each federation ensures that all players are aware of these Regulations and acknowledge Fair-Play rules (see Chapter 6). 3. 2. The list of the registered teams (see Article 3.1) ranged according to FPR (see Article 2.2.a) shall be published by 3 August. 3. 3. DIVISION 4 composition shall be announced by 14 August. 3. 4. If a team withdraws after the composition of the divisions is announced, there shall be no changes to the composition of the division. A federation which fails to provide a satisfactory reason for its team withdrawal may be sanctioned by the FIDE Council. 3. 5. Each pool shall be played within three days. The exact times for each pool tournament in each DIVISION and for each Duel shall be announced two days prior to the beginning, teams’ time zones shall be taken into consideration. Playing sessions shall preferably start between 10 am and 8 pm local time. 4. Schedule DATES EVENT NUMBER OF TEAMS SYSTEM STAGE 1. DIVISIONS 5 pools, 12 teams each. RR, 11 r. 20 – 22 August DIVISION 4 60 3 best teams of each pool advance to DIVISION 3 5 pools, 10 teams each. RR, 9 r. 50 (35 seeded + 15 qualified 27 – 29 August DIVISION 3 3 best teams of each pool advance from DIVISION 4) to DIVISION 2 5 pools, 10 teams each. RR, 9 r. 50 (35 seeded + 15 qualified 2 – 4 September DIVISION 2 3 best teams of each pool advance from DIVISION 3) to TOP DIVISION 4 pools, 10 teams each. RR, 9 r. 40 (25 seeded + 15 qualified 8 – 10 September TOP DIVISION 2 best teams of each pool advance from DIVISION 2) to STAGE 2. STAGE 2. PLAY-OFF QUARTER- 8 (qualified from TOP 13 September KO duel of two matches + TB FINALS DIVISION) 4 (qualified from QUARTER- 14 September SEMI-FINALS KO duel of two matches + TB FINALS) 2 (qualified from SEMI- 15 September FINAL KO duel of two matches + TB FINALS) 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eleventh Annual Conference Chicago, Illinois 2005 August 18 – 21 John F
    North American Sundial Society - Eleventh Annual Conference Chicago, Illinois 2005 August 18 – 21 John F. Schilke Who would not enjoy the mystique and appeal of free copies of Proceedings [of the] ISAMA CTI 2004, Chicago, that huge city on the shore of Lake Michigan? produced for a symposium on mathematics and design The architectural variety has to be seen to be held at DePaul. Among the door prize winners were appreciated. True, the weather was hot and sticky at Dwight Carpenter (several things, including a peg dial the first, but it soon settled into very pleasant summer and dial coins), Donn McNealy (Plymouth equatorial days and nights. DePaul University CTI Center sundial), Carl Schneider (a copy of Mike Cowham’s A provided a very comfortable setting for the thirty-four Dial in Your Poke), Dean Conners (A. P. Herbert’s people who attended the sessions. Fourteen wives and Sundials Old and New). A copy of Frank Cousins’ one care-giver, all hailing from 13 states and a total of Sundials became Walter Sanford’s prize, and Jacque 13 from Argentina, Canada, Germany, Taiwan, and the Olin and Karl Schneider each received a copy of Simon United Kingdom. During the conference several wives Wheaton-Smith’s Illustrating Shadows. took tours of Chicago and of the Chicago Art Museum with its special exhibition on Toulouse-Lautrec. Roger Bailey then showed how to program the programmable scientific calculator included in each registration packet. In doing so, he provided solutions to some of the equations useful in creating dials. Most actually got them to work! After a continental breakfast on Friday we boarded the bus to visit first the Museum of Science and Industry to see dials in their collection, including a fine example of a first-century (AD) dial, adjudged to be a slight variant of a hemisphaerium.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Science Olympiad National Tournament Tournament Schedule & Event Blocks
    2021 Science Olympiad National Tournament Tournament Schedule & Event Blocks 2021 Science Olympiad National Tournament Competition Schedule Mountain Pacific Alaska Hawaii Event Block Eastern Time Central Time Time Time Time Time Block 1 11:00 AM 10:00 AM 9:00 AM 8:00 AM Block 2 12:10 PM 11:10 AM 10:10 AM 9:10 AM 8:10 AM Block 3 1:20 PM 12:20 PM 11:20 AM 10:20 AM 9:20 AM Block 4 2:30 PM 1:30 PM 12:30 PM 11:30 AM 10:30 AM 8:30 AM STEM Showdown 3:00 PM 2:00 PM 1:00 PM 12:00 PM 11:00 AM 9:00 AM Trial Events Block 5 3:40 PM 2:40 PM 1:40 PM 12:40 PM 11:40 AM 9:40 AM Block 6 4:50 PM 3:50 PM 2:50 PM 1:50 PM 12:50 PM 10:50 AM Block 7 2:00 PM 12:00 PM Block 8 1:10 PM Block 9 2:20 PM The 2021 Science Olympiad Tournament will start across the United States at the times shown above. The times listed above reflect the local time in that Time Zone on May 22, 2021. Each Event Block will run for one hour and be followed by a 10- minute Break before the next Event Block begins. No team will begin the competition prior to 8:00 AM local time. Teams from Alaska and Hawaii will join the tournament in progress and complete any Event Blocks missed at the end of their day.
    [Show full text]
  • NACLO 2021 Student Handbook
    The Fifteenth Annual North American Computational Linguistics Open Competition 2021 www.nacloweb.org 2021 Student Handbook September 15, 2020 Please check the website for updates and announcements 2021 Contest Dates (USA and Anglophone Canada)* Open Round: January 28, 2021 / Invitational Round: March 11, 2021 Site registration deadline: January 10, 2021 Student registration deadline: January 15, 2021 Contact [email protected] if you miss the deadline. Walk-ins allowed with advance permission of the local site host. * The dates for the 2021 Francophone contest in Canada will be announced later. Check the OLC-CLO site. 1 ABOUT Introduction NACLO is a fun (and educational!) contest for U.S. and Canadian high school students in which contestants compete by solving compelling and creative puzzles in linguistics and computational linguistics. Requiring no previous knowledge of linguistics, languages, or computing, these puzzles can be solved by analytic reasoning alone, and serve as a fun introduction to a field to which many high school students have never been introduced. Winners of NACLO are eligible to compete in the International Linguistics Olympiad, one of twelve international high school science Olympiads. Contact [email protected] What’s New in 2021? We have released an addendum detailing our COVID-19 contingency plans. It will continue to be updated throughout the months leading up to the competition. University sites will also be updating their NACLO websites to reflect the situation on their campuses. Contest in Canada The Anglophone contest in Canada takes place jointly with the contest in the United States. As of the writing of this version of the handbook, the dates for the 2021 Francophone contest in Canada have not been announced.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations for the Chess Olympiad
    D.II. Chess Olympiad D.II.01 Regulations for the Chess Olympiad 1. General 1.1 The Chess Olympiad is the principal team contest organized by FIDE. 1.1.1 The Olympiad is held regularly at two year intervals in the autumn of the even numbered years (2006, 2008, etc.) 1.1.2 The Olympiad for both the open section and the women section must be held, if possible, at a single venue. 1.1.3 However, in exceptional cases as determined by the FIDE General Assembly or (in between congresses) by the President - separate venues may be used for the men and women contests. 1.1.4 Organizing body: FIDE, represented by the FIDE President. 1.1.5 Administrator 1.1.5.1 The administrator is appointed through a special selection process (section 2 below). 1.1.5.2 The administrator is responsible to FIDE, and must abide by these regulations. 1.1.5.3 The administrator shall make available all necessary premises, staff and funds for the contest. The minimum requirements are laid down in individual sections of these regulations. 1.1.5.4 The administrator may utilize the services of outside bodies or private persons for the purpose of financing and running the contest. 1.1.5.5 Administrators may be proposed by the federations. 1.1.5.6 The President may also receive offers from sponsors outside the sphere of FIDE. 1.1.5.7 The tasks of the administrator are detailed in subsequent sections of these regulations. 1.1.6 FIDE Congress The administrator who undertakes the running of the Chess Olympiad must also undertake to hold the FIDE Congress for the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Division C Rules Manual
    Exploring the World of Science Division C Rules Manual Division C (Gr. 9-12) SCIENCE OLYMPIAD, INC. © 2020 WELCOME TO THE 2020 SCIENCE OLYMPIAD! This Rules Manual will help you prepare to compete in Invitational, Regional, State and National Tournaments held across the United States annually. Each Science Olympiad event has a corresponding page on the Science Olympiad national website complete with free resources, training handouts and useful links. All users of this manual are subject to the Terms of Use Agreement. To compete, users must first join the Science Olympiad program in their home state and become registered members. See our website for info on Membership, Policies and Terms of Use at www.soinc.org Division C (Grades 9-12) Membership Rules A team may have up to fifteen (15) members. A maximum of seven (7) 12th grade students is permitted on a Division C team. Division B (Grades 6-9) Membership Rules A team may have up to fifteen (15) members. A maximum of five (5) 9th grade students is permitted on a Division B team. Because middle schools that do not have grades 7, 8 or 9 are at a slight disadvantage, they may invite any combination of up to five (5) of their last year’s 6th, 7th or 8th grade students to be part of the team. Possible examples can be found on the Science Olympiad website. Students Below Grade Level Designations Science Olympiad encourages students to participate in the Division that matches current Science Olympiad grade level designations. However, to support the inclusion of students who wish to participate in Science Olympiad, schools with grade levels lower than those stated in a Division are permitted to invite members below the grade level designations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Science Olympiad Alumni Where Are They Now? Stories of Scientific
    Science Olympiad Alumni Where Are They Now? Stories of Scientific Achievement and Inspiration To celebrate the 20th anniversary of national competition in 2004, Science Olympiad began an effort to track down its most illustrious alumni. We were specifically interested to discover if Science Olympiad had an impact on the choice of a career in science or technology. Of the hundreds of respondents, more than 80% answered with a resounding “Yes!” Kathleen Markiewicz Teacher, Boston Public Schools Competed from 1998 to 2000 “It solidified my love for science. I enjoyed getting to learn about many areas of science in Science Olympiad, and I continue to be interested in lots of science disciplines. In particular, Science Olympiad showed me that I love chemistry and physics, which ultimately were my majors for my undergraduate degree. I am also coaching my own Science Olympiad team at the Boston Latin School, and it’s a great way to come full circle. My fiancé, who I met while on the Grand Haven High School Science Olympiad team, is also helping me coach.” Rich Radke Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Competed in the early 1990s “I believe that Science Olympiad was very helpful in showing me that science could be interesting and fun, and that there were organizations that rewarded people for achievement in science and math,” said an 18-year-old Radke in 1993. Today, Radke is a celebrated researcher and the winner of the National Science Foundation’s Early Career Development Award for his work with networked cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • Math Olympiad Hardness Scale (MOHS) Because Arguing About Problem Difficulty Is Fun :P
    Math Olympiad Hardness Scale (MOHS) because arguing about problem difficulty is fun :P Evan Chen April 30, 2021 In this document I provide my personal ratings of difficulties of problems from selected recent contests. This involves defining (rather carefully) a rubric by which I evaluate difficulty. I call this the MOHS hardness scale (pronounced \moez"); I also go sometimes use the unit \M" (for \Mohs"). The scale proceeds in increments of 5M, with a lowest possible rating of 0M and a highest possible rating of 60M; but in practice few problems are rated higher than 50M, so it is better thought of as a scale from 0M to 50M, with a few “off-the-chart" ratings. 1 Warning §1.1 These ratings are subjective Despite everything that's written here, at the end of the day, these ratings are ultimately my personal opinion. I make no claim that these ratings are objective or that they represent some sort of absolute truth. For comedic value: Remark (Warranty statement). The ratings are provided \as is", without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement. In no event shall Evan be liable for any claim, damages or other liability, whether in an action of contract, tort or otherwise, arising from, out of, or in connection to, these ratings. §1.2 Suggested usage More important warning: excessive use of these ratings can hinder you. For example, if you end up choosing to not seriously attempt certain problems because their rating is 40M or higher, then you may hurt yourself in your confusion by depriving yourself of occasional exposure to difficult problems.1 If you don't occasionally try IMO3 level problems with real conviction, then you will never get to a point of actually being able to solve them.2 For these purposes, paradoxically, it's often better to not know the problem is hard, so you do not automatically adopt a defeatist attitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Calendar and the Almanac
    1914.] Notes on Calendar and Almanac. 11 NOTES ON THE CALENDAR AND THE ALMANAC. BY GEORGE EMERY LITTLEFIELD. In answering the question, why do the officers of pub- he libraries and bibliophiles so highly esteem and strive to make collections of old calendars and almanacs, it may be said that the calendar was coeval with and had a great influence upon civilization. Indeed, the slow but gradual formation of what we know as a calendar is an excellent illustration of the progress of civilization. At first it was a very crude scheme for recording the passing of time, deduced from irregular observations of the rising and setting of a few fixed stars, by a people who had but recently emerged from barbarism. The resultant table was of very little value and required constant revision and correction. It was only by long and patient study and observation, by gaining knowledge from repeated failures, that finally was produced the accurate and scientific register, which today bears the name of calendar. Furthermore, the material and shape of the tablet upon which the calendar was engraved or printed, was a constant .temptation to artists to decorate it with pen- cil or brush, which caused it to become a valuable me- dium for inculcating in the minds of the people, ideas of the sublime and beautiful, and never more so than at the present time. As regards the almanac, it also is of ancient memory, as we have positive evidence of its existence more than twelve hundred years before the Christian era. To its compilation scientists, philosophers, theologians, poets 12 American Antiquarian Sodety.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian National Astronomy Olympiad – 2020
    Downloaded From :http://cbseportal.com/ Indian National Astronomy Olympiad { 2020 Question Paper INAO { 2020 Roll Number: rorororo - rorororo - rorororo Date: 1st February 2020 Duration: Three Hours Maximum Marks: 100 Please Note: • Please write your roll number in the space provided above. • There are a total of 7 questions. Maximum marks are indicated in front of each sub-question. • For all questions, the process involved in arriving at the solution is more important than the final answer. Valid assumptions / approximations are perfectly acceptable. Please write your method clearly, explicitly stating all reasoning / assumptions / approximations. • Use of non-programmable scientific calculators is allowed. • The answer-sheet must be returned to the invigilator. You can take this question paper back with you. • Please take note of following details about Orientation-Cum-Selection Camp (OCSC) in Astronomy: { Tentative Dates: 21st April to 8th May 2020. { This camp will be held at HBCSE, Mumbai. { Attending the camp for the entire duration is mandatory for all participants. Useful Constants 30 Mass of the Sun M ≈ 1:989 × 10 kg 24 Mass of the Earth M⊕ ≈ 5:972 × 10 kg 22 Mass of the Moon Mm ≈ 7:347 × 10 kg 6 Radius of the Earth R⊕ ≈ 6:371 × 10 m Speed of Light c ≈ 2:998 × 108 m s−1 8 Radius of the Sun R ≈ 6:955 × 10 m 6 Radius of the Moon Rm ≈ 1:737 × 10 m 11 Astronomical Unit (au) a⊕ ≈ 1:496 × 10 m 26 Solar Luminosity L ≈ 3:826 × 10 W Gravitational Constant G ≈ 6:674 × 10−11 N m2 kg−2 Gravitational acceleration g ≈ 9:8 m=s2 1 parsec (pc) 1 pc = 3:086 × 1016 m Stefan's Constant σ = 5:670 × 10−8 Wm−2K−4 HOMI BHABHA CENTRE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Downloaded From :http://cbseportal.com/V.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar As a Criterion in the Study of Culture
    Article Calendar as a Criterion in the Study of Culture Marija Šegan-Radonji´c 1,‡ and Stevo Šegan 2,‡ 1 Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts 2 Department of Mathematics, State University of Novi Pazar Abstract: The paper considers the calendar as a link between the cosmos and mankind, and it introduces it as an instrument in studying culture. It uses the concept of calendars/calendar systems as a criterion for recognition and formation of culture in general. Starting from an assumption that the calendar is a structurally organized system of events or holidays, it analyses the basic units of a calendar: day, month and year, and distinguishes a calendar holiday from a non-calendar holiday. It states that the calendars are a structural list of collective memory within a social group, where this memory is described in cyclical categories – calendar holidays. Furthermore, considering that the initial epoch of year counting may be different in different cultures, it discusses how cultural self-awareness is expressed through the epoch of the calendar era. Finally, it explores how and to what extent the formation, interaction, and reforms of calendars and their systems reflect the change in culture. The paper concludes that calendars and their systems should be used as a criterion in defining culture. Keywords: Calendar; Culture. 1. Introduction Culture, as a notion, can be considered in a narrower and a broader sense1, and some theoreticians have succeeded to identify as many as 164 definitions of this phenomenon [2]. Furthermore, modern science strives to comprehend and describe this phenomenon as generally as possible, and the new complex disciplines, such as the problem of culture typology (criterion) [3], have appeared and been developed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendar: Its History, Structure And
    !!i\LENDAR jS, HISTORY, STRUCTURE 1 III i; Q^^feiTAA^gvyuLj^^ v^ i Jb^ n n !> f llfelftr I ^'^\C)SL<^ THE CALENDAR BY THE SAME AUTHOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR, WITH NOTES OF AN ADDRESS ON CALENDAR REFORM AND SOCIAL PRO- GRESS DELIVERED TO THE ABERDEEN ROTARY CLUB. 32 pp. Crown 8vo. zs.dd. GEORGE ROUTLEDGE & SONS, Ltd. A PLEA FOR AN ORDERLY ALMANAC. 62 pp. Crown 8vo. Cloth zs. 6d. Stiff boards is. 6d. BRECHIN : D. H. EDWARDS. LONDON : GEORGE ROUTLEDGE & SONS, Ltd. THE CALENDAR ITS HISTORY, STRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENT BY ALEXANDER PHILIP, LL.B., F.R.S. Edin. CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS I 9 2 I CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. Clay, Manager LONDON : FETTER LANE, E.C.4 fij n*'A NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN CO. BOM HAY ) CALCUTTA I MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. MADRAS j TORONTO : THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TOKYO : MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED M u rO(Ku CE 73 f.HS PREFACE THE following essay is intended to serve as a text-book for those interested in current discussion concerning the Calendar. Its design is to exhibit a concise view of the origin and develop- ment of the Calendar now in use in Europe and America, to explain the principles and rules of its construction, to show the human purposes for which it is required and employed and to indicate how far it effectively serves these purposes, where it is deficient and how its deficiencies can be most simply and efficiently amended. After the reform of the Calendar initiated by Pope Gregory XIII there were published a number of exhaustive treatises on the subject—^voluminous tomes characterised by the prolix eru- dition of the seventeenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Hosts International Mathematical Olympiad
    comm-olympiad.qxp 5/30/01 10:13 AM Page 593 U.S. Hosts International Mathematical Olympiad For the first time in twenty years the United States observers to IMO 2001. In many countries the per- is serving as host for the International Mathemat- formance of the IMO teams is closely watched. ical Olympiad (IMO), the premier international John Kenelly of Clemson University, who serves as mathematics competition for young people. In July president of IMO 2001, noted that “it’s on the front 2001 about 500 high-school-age students from 83 page of the newspapers who is number one.” countries will gather in Washington, DC, for the This year’s IMO is under the supervision of a two-week event, which includes a full schedule nonprofit corporation called IMO 2001 USA, Inc., of entertainment and cultural activities for the formed by twenty-one professional organizations students. The IMO competition itself, consisting of (including the AMS). The host country for the IMO six challenging questions requiring essay-format must pay the local expenses of the student con- answers with proofs, will take place over two days, testants, the team leaders, and the deputy team July 8 and 9, at George Mason University. leaders—a total of more than 650 individuals for IMO 2001. The budget for this year’s Olympiad A Major International Event comes to around $3 million. Walter Mientka of the First held in Romania in 1959, the IMO was University of Nebraska, director of IMO 2001, noted originally a regional competition for countries in that in most countries the minister of education Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]