Hazard Identification Report 2019 Section B: Environmental Hazards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hazard Identification Report 2019 Section B: Environmental Hazards Hazard Identification Report 2019 Section B: Environmental Hazards Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Program Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management Introduction The Hazard Report contains information profiles for hazards, including a high-level overview of possible consequences. It is divided into 10 parts; an introduction and 9 sub-sections labelled A-I as follows: A. Agriculture and Food F. Public Safety B. Environmental G. Structural C. Extraterrestrial H. Supply and Distribution D. Hazardous Materials I. Transportation E. Health Contents Environmental Hazards: Hazards related to the interaction of environmental forces with human systems and environments Avalanche ....................................................................................................................... 3 Drought or Low Water ..................................................................................................... 7 Earthquake .................................................................................................................... 13 Erosion .......................................................................................................................... 19 Extreme Cold ................................................................................................................ 24 Extreme Heat ................................................................................................................ 30 Flood ............................................................................................................................. 36 Fog ................................................................................................................................ 44 High Wind ...................................................................................................................... 48 Hurricane ....................................................................................................................... 53 Landslide ....................................................................................................................... 59 Land Subsidence .......................................................................................................... 64 Lightning ........................................................................................................................ 69 Storm Surge .................................................................................................................. 74 Thunderstorm ................................................................................................................ 78 Tornado ......................................................................................................................... 83 Wildland Fire (Forest Fire, Wildfire) ............................................................................... 90 Winter Weather ............................................................................................................. 96 Hazard Identification Report 2019 – Section B Page 2 of 103 Avalanche Photo Credit: Gaijin Ninja. "Alpine Chairlift View." Feb 26,2012. Online image. Accessed Feb 21 2019. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlpineChairliftView.JPG> Avalanche Go to next hazard: Drought or Low Water Definition A snow avalanche ensues when a pent up snow mass loses its hold and is discharged from a slope. Description Snow can fracture when the strength of the bonds that hold it together are overcome by stress that overloads the bonds. If enough bonds fracture at once, an avalanche occurs. The sources of stress that can overload a snowpack and cause fracture are called triggers. Natural triggers occur independently of human activity. Some common natural triggers are: • Loading from new snow, wind driven snow or rain. • Temperature changes and thawing caused by warm air and solar radiation. Even if the right snowpack conditions and triggers are available, avalanches will only occur on terrain with certain features and characteristics. Avalanches are most likely to occur on slopes between 30-45 degrees, and in areas where wind causes snow to accumulate, and where sun exposure has resulted in weak snow due to rapid warming and melting. The three main types of avalanche are: • Sluffs/Sloughs: Small slides of dry powdery snow that move as a formless mass • Slab: Slabs of snow break loose from a mountainside and shatter like broken glass as they race downhill. These moving masses can reach speeds of 80 miles (130 kilometers) per hour within about five seconds. • Wet: Low velocity suspension of snow and water, with the flow confined to the track surface. Can be initiated from either loose snow releases, or slab releases, and only occur in snow packs that are water saturated Every modern ski resort will issue notices (bulletins) indicating the level of Avalanche Risk for each day. These risk levels range from Low to Very high (extreme). Spatial Scale, Timing and Warning period Spatial Scale: The spatial scale of avalanche in Ontario would be small, and usually away from settlements. Hazard Identification Report 2019 – Section B Page 4 of 103 Timing: Avalanche could occur during the winter and into the spring, and are most common in the 24 hours following heavy snowfall. Warning Period: The warning period would vary from 24 hours to seasonal in scale. Potential Impact A strong Avalanche may result in: • The need for debris management • Reports of missing individuals. The need for search and rescue, family reunification operations • Multi-modal transport disruptions, the need for detours or re-routing. May strain transportation management resources and cause transportation delays. • The need for damage assessment. • The need for evacuation or shelter in place. • Property and structural damage, the need for repair. Possible impact on Critical Infrastructure. • The need for site or area access restrictions. Secondary Hazards Potential secondary hazards may include: • Building or Structure Failure • Erosion • Rail, Light Rail, Subway • Road and Highway Past Incidents There have been two incidents of avalanche recorded for Ontario in the Canadian Disaster Database: • Scarborough, 1972: An avalanche in highland creek killed 2 people. • Chelmsford, 1978: An avalanche killed 1 individual that was hiking in Chelmsford area. Both avalanches were small and isolated. Provincial Risk Statement Avalanches are exceedingly rare in Ontario. While snow is common, the terrain is generally not steep enough to create significant avalanche risk. Educating the general public about avalanche risk, as well as sign-posting and cordoning off areas at risk for such hazards are the most utilized and effective means of Hazard Identification Report 2019 – Section B Page 5 of 103 prevention. There are also safety courses and other further education opportunities available for those spending a lot of time in the backcountry. Given that the risk of avalanche is so low in Ontario, further mitigation measures are seldom needed. Human Impacts Avalanche rarely results in fatalities or injuries. Social Impacts Avalanche would not lead to impacts on community support mechanisms. Property Damage Property can be vulnerable to avalanche, though the occurrence is extremely unlikely in Ontario. Critical Infrastructure Disruptions Critical Infrastructure can be vulnerable to avalanche, though the occurrence is extremely unlikely in Ontario. Environmental Damage Avalanche would not result in environmental damage, except when it damages forests and trees. Economic Avalanche could result in very limited economic impacts, though this is unlikely in Ontario. Hazard Identification Report 2019 – Section B Page 6 of 103 Drought or Low Water Photo Credit: Taylor, Robert. "Healey Falls Low Water." Jul 16,2011. Online image. Accessed Feb 21 2019. <https://commons.wikimedia. org/wiki/File:Healey_Falls_Low_Water,_Trent_Hills,_Ontario_4949_(59 44120938).jpg> Drought or Low Water EnvironmentalGo to Previous Hazard: Avalanche Go to next hazard: Earthquake Definition Drought (also referred to as a period of low water) is an extended period, with one or more of the following: 1 • Three months or greater with below average precipitation which may be combined with high rates of evaporation. • Conditions in which the water levels in streams are at the minimum required for the survival of aquatic life. Water must be rationed only for high priority uses since many wells are becoming dry. • Conditions that have socioeconomic impacts that are felt over a much larger area than the individual properties that the drought/low water conditions have been reported at. Description Drought conditions are naturally occurring phenomenon that can also be triggered or exacerbated by human activities, such as the altering of ecosystems. They are characterized by decrease in the normal amount of precipitation that the area receives. High air temperatures leading to higher rates of evaporation may increase the severity of the drought. The amount and type of vegetation in the affected area may also contribute to the severity through evapotranspiration losses. Natural factors that influence the levels of Lake Ontario include inflow from Lake Erie and weather patterns (precipitation, wind, and temperatures). Of particular concern are lack of precipitation and warm weather, which have the greatest effect on water levels, along with reduced levels of ice during the winter, which increases evaporation. Changes to weather and climate patterns could therefore
Recommended publications
  • Storm Data Publication
    FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 50 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA NUMBER 2 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....…………...…...........…............ 5 Reference Notes .............……...........................……….........…..….…............................................ 278 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except for limited editing to correct grammatical errors, the data in Storm Data are published as received. Note: “None Reported” means that no severe weather occurred and “Not Received” means that no reports were received for this region at the time of printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Submission of Terms of Reference
    NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF TERMS OF REFERENCE This notification is to announce the submission of the Cliffs Chromite Project Documents Available for Review Terms of Reference to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). Please read You may inspect the proposed Terms of Reference during below for further information about the Project. normal business hours at the following locations, please check with your nearest location for their specific hours of operation: Cliffs Natural Resources Ministry of the Environment Valley East Public Library Inc. (Cliffs) is undergoing a Approvals Branch 4100 Elmview Drive, provincial and federal Floor 12A, 2 St. Clair Ave West, Hanmer, P3P 1J7 Toronto, M4V 1L5 Environmental Assessment Capreol Citizen Service (EA) for the Cliffs Ministry of the Environment Centre & Library Thunder Bay District Office 1-9 Morin Street, Chromite Project. The Suite 331, 435 James Street South, Capreol, P0M 1H0 Thunder Bay, P7E 6S7 EA will assess the Brodie Resource Library following four components Ministry of the Environment 216 South Brodie Street, of the Project: Sudbury District Office Thunder Bay, P7E 1C2 Suite 1201, 199 Larch Street, Sudbury , P3E 5P9 Waverley Resource Library 1) The Mine Site, located 285 Red River Road, near McFaulds Lake; Ministry of the Environment Thunder Bay, P7B 1A9 Timmins District Office 2) An Ore Processing Ontario Govt. Complex Elsie Dugard Centennial Library Facility, co-located at Hwy 101 East, South Porcupine, P0N 1H0 405 Second Street West, the Mine Site; Geraldton, P0T 1M0 Greenstone Municipal
    [Show full text]
  • …Top 10 Weather Events of 2012…
    …Top 10 weather events of 2012… In terms of severe weather, 2012 started out fast and furious, and then petered out by late March. 1) By anyone’s measure, the tornado outbreak on the 2nd of March must qualify as our top event of 2012. The 49 mile long EF-4 tornado that tracked across southern Indiana became the first EF-4 in our forecast area since the northern Bullitt County tornado on May 28, 1996. Seven other tornadoes also developed on March 2, with 3 confirmed tornadoes in Trimble County alone. The image to the left shows two supercells following similar paths across southern Indiana. The first cell was producing an EF-4 tornado at this time. The second storm later brought softball sized hail and an EF-1 tornado just south of Henryville. Also, excessively large hail fell across both southern Indiana and south central Kentucky. Outside of several reports of softball-sized hail near Henryville, Indiana, associated with the second of two supercells that tracked over nearly the same path, our most damaging hailstorm developed across southwestern Adair County. This storm produced a hail swath more than 10 miles long, smashing the windshields of hundreds of vehicles before knocking out the skylights of a Walmart store in Columbia. The first picture, courtesy Simon Brewer of The Weather Channel, shows a large tornado in Washington County, IN. The image at left shows hail damage to a golf course near Henryville. 2) The Leap Day tornado outbreak on February 29 featured a squall line that spawned 6 tornadoes across central and south central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • A Winter Forecasting Handbook Winter Storm Information That Is Useful to the Public
    A Winter Forecasting Handbook Winter storm information that is useful to the public: 1) The time of onset of dangerous winter weather conditions 2) The time that dangerous winter weather conditions will abate 3) The type of winter weather to be expected: a) Snow b) Sleet c) Freezing rain d) Transitions between these three 7) The intensity of the precipitation 8) The total amount of precipitation that will accumulate 9) The temperatures during the storm (particularly if they are dangerously low) 7) The winds and wind chill temperature (particularly if winds cause blizzard conditions where visibility is reduced). 8) The uncertainty in the forecast. Some problems facing meteorologists: Winter precipitation occurs on the mesoscale The type and intensity of winter precipitation varies over short distances. Forecast products are not well tailored to winter Subtle features, such as variations in the wet bulb temperature, orography, urban heat islands, warm layers aloft, dry layers, small variations in cyclone track, surface temperature, and others all can influence the severity and character of a winter storm event. FORECASTING WINTER WEATHER Important factors: 1. Forcing a) Frontal forcing (at surface and aloft) b) Jetstream forcing c) Location where forcing will occur 2. Quantitative precipitation forecasts from models 3. Thermal structure where forcing and precipitation are expected 4. Moisture distribution in region where forcing and precipitation are expected. 5. Consideration of microphysical processes Forecasting winter precipitation in 0-48 hour time range: You must have a good understanding of the current state of the Atmosphere BEFORE you try to forecast a future state! 1. Examine current data to identify positions of cyclones and anticyclones and the location and types of fronts.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change
    Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change Item Type Thesis Authors Ward, Jamie L. Download date 07/10/2021 05:51:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10484/5573 Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change _______________________ A thesis Presented to The College of Graduate and Professional Studies Department of Earth and Environmental Systems Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana ______________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _______________________ by Jamie L. Ward August 2014 Jamie L. Ward, 2014 Keywords: Alberta Clippers, Storm Tracks, Lee Cyclogenesis, Global Climate Change, Atmospheric Analogues ii COMMITTEE MEMBERS Committee Chair: Gregory D. Bierly (Ph.D.) Professor of Geography Indiana State University Committee Member: Stephen Aldrich (Ph.D.) Assistant Professor of Geography Indiana State University Committee Member: Jennifer C. Latimer Associate Professor of Geology Indiana State University iii ABSTRACT Alberta Clippers are extratropical cyclones that form in the lee of the Canadian Rocky Mountains and traverse through the Great Plains and Midwest regions of the United States. With the imminent threat of global climate change and its effects on regional teleconnection patterns like El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), properties of Alberta Clipper could be altered as a result of changing atmospheric circulation patterns. Since the Great Plains and Midwest regions both support a large portion of the national population and agricultural activity, the effects of global climate change on Alberta Clippers could affect these areas in a variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synoptic-Climatology and Composite Analysis of the Alberta Clipper
    !"#$%&'()*+*,)-!(&,&.$"!%/"*&-'&#)(0"!%!,$#)#"&1 (20"!,304(!"*,)''04 !" #$%&'()*+),-./%01)234)5.'%,-%')(+)/%6,&'7 1!"#"$%$&$'()*%+,-./)0.1#")2+,34)!1441&")5+,'"/)6"7)!"81-$ 9:";+%#<",#)$=)>#<$4;."%1-)+,3)?-"+,1-)2-1",-"4 @,1A"%41#()$=)014-$,41,B!+314$, C99D)0E):+(#$,)2#E !+314$,/)0F)DGHIJ KJILM)9J9BNLOD P"<+%#1CQ714-E"3R 08!9:;;<4)=>?)@8!A:B2;:>3);>)0"+#."%)+,3)S$%"-+4#1,'C)7D)58A")7EEF "#$%&"'% $()*+,-.+/0.(11-)2+3).+/+456-6.*)78.9:-.;'<=>.%?@".0+9+6-9.+)-.(6-0.97.,7/69)(,9 +.,438+9747A5.7*.BCC."4D-)9+.'4311-)6.7E-).BF.D7)-+4.,740.6-+67/6.G?,97D-)2<+),:H.*)78 BIJK2JC.97.!LLL2LBM..%:-."4D-)9+.'4311-).G:-)-+*9-).638145.!"#$$%&H.7,,()6.8769.*)-N(-/945 0()3/A.O-,-8D-).+/0.P+/(+)5.+/0.6(D69+/93+445.4-66.*)-N(-/945.0()3/A.?,97D-).+/0.<+),:M %:-6-.,5,47/-6.A-/-)+445.87E-.67(9:-+69Q+)0.*)78.9:-.4--.7*.9:-.'+/+03+/.&7,R3-6.97Q+)0 7).S(69./7)9:.7*.T+R-.$(1-)37).D-*7)-.1)7A)-663/A.-+69Q+)0.3/97.67(9:-+69-)/.'+/+0+.7).9:- /7)9:-+69-)/.U/39-0.$9+9-6V.Q39:.4-66.9:+/.BLW.7*.,+6-6.3/.9:-.,438+9747A5.9)+,R3/A.67(9:.7* 9:-.@)-+9.T+R-6M ':+)+,9-)3693,6.7*.9:-.69)(,9()-.+/0.-E74(937/.7*.'4311-)6.0()3/A.+.XK2:.1-)370.4-+03/A (1.97.0-1+)9()-.7*.9:-.,5,47/-.*)78.9:-.4--.7*.9:-.'+/+03+/.&7,R3-6.+/0.+.KL2:.1-)370.+*9-) 0-1+)9()-.+6.9:-.,5,47/-.9)+E-)6-6.,-/9)+4.+/0.-+69-)/.Y7)9:."8-)3,+.+)-.-Z+83/-0.9:)7(A: ,7817639-.+/+456-6M..?E-).9:-.,7()6-.7*.9:-.1)-20-1+)9()-.1-)370V.+.,5,47/-.7E-).9:-.@(4*.7* "4+6R+.+11)7+,:-6.9:-.Q-69.,7+69.7*.Y7)9:."8-)3,+V.+/0.9:)7(A:.396.3/9-)+,937/.Q39:.9:- 87(/9+3/7(6.9-))+3/.7*.Q-69-)/.Y7)9:."8-)3,+.61+Q/6.+.6()*+,-.4--.9)7(A:V.,:+)+,9-)3[-0.D5
    [Show full text]
  • Wahnapitae First Nation
    MULTI-SECTOR SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2017 SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT with Wahnapitae First Nation Effective Date: April 1, 2014 Index to Agreement ARTICLE 1.0 - DEFINITIONS & INTERPRETATION ARTICLE 2.0 - TERM AND NATURE OF THIS AGREEMENT ARTICLE 3.0 - PROVISION OF SERVICES ARTICLE 4.0 - FUNDING ARTICLE 5.0 - REPAYMENT AND RECOVERY OF FUNDING ARTICLE 6.0 - PLANNING & INTEGRATION ARTICLE 7.0 - PERFORMANCE ARTICLE 8.0 - REPORTING, ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW ARTICLE 9.0 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LHIN SUPPORT ARTICLE 10.0 - REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS ARTICLE 11.0 - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, INDEMNITY & INSURANCE ARTICLE 12.0 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 13.0 - NOTICE ARTICLE 14.0 - ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 15.0 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT Schedules A - Detailed Description of Services B - Service Plan C - Reports D - Directives, Guidelines, Policies & Standards E - Performance F - Project Funding Agreement Template G - Compliance THE AGREEMENT effective as of the 1st day of April, 2014 BETWEEN : NORTH EAST LOCAL HEALTH INTEGRATION NETWORK (the “LHIN”) - and - Wahnapitae First Nation (the “HSP”) Background: The Local Health System Integration Act, 2006 requires that the LHIN and the HSP enter into a service accountability agreement. The service accountability agreement supports a collaborative relationship between the LHIN and the HSP to improve the health of Ontarians through better access to high quality health services, to co-ordinate health care in local health systems and to manage the health system at the local level effectively and efficiently. In this context, the HSP and the LHIN agree that the LHIN will provide funding to the HSP on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement to enable the provision of services to the local health system by the HSP.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Climatology of Lake-Effect Snow Events Off the Western Great Lakes
    climate Article Synoptic Climatology of Lake-Effect Snow Events off the Western Great Lakes Jake Wiley * and Andrew Mercer Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: As the mesoscale dynamics of lake-effect snow (LES) are becoming better understood, recent and ongoing research is beginning to focus on the large-scale environments conducive to LES. Synoptic-scale composites are constructed for Lake Michigan and Lake Superior LES events by employing an LES case repository for these regions within the U.S. North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data for each LES event were used to construct synoptic maps of dominant LES patterns for each lake. These maps were formulated using a previously implemented composite technique that blends principal component analysis with a k-means cluster analysis. A sample case from each resulting cluster was also selected and simulated using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecast model to obtain an example mesoscale depiction of the LES environment. The study revealed four synoptic setups for Lake Michigan and three for Lake Superior whose primary differences were discrepancies in a surface pressure dipole structure previously linked with Great Lakes LES. These subtle synoptic-scale differences suggested that while overall LES impacts were driven more by the mesoscale conditions for these lakes, synoptic-scale conditions still provided important insight into the character of LES forcing mechanisms, primarily the steering flow and air–lake thermodynamics. Keywords: lake-effect; climatology; numerical weather prediction; synoptic; mesoscale; winter weather; Great Lakes; snow Citation: Wiley, J.; Mercer, A.
    [Show full text]
  • January 21, 2014 Winter Storm by Heather Sheffield, General
    January 21, 2014 Winter Storm By Heather Sheffield, General Forecaster The snow forecast quickly escalated 36 hours prior to the first snowflakes on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. Model Guidance over the weekend and prior to the event became snowier with each model run and consistency led to the issuance of a Winter Storm Warning on Monday, January 20, 2014. An upper trough was located across the eastern half of the United States. The storm track leading up to this event featured numerous waves of low pressure, called Alberta clippers, diving southeastward around the upper trough from central Canada into the mid-Atlantic region. Alberta clippers typically produce little precipitation since they originate from central Canada- a region without a large source of moisture. However, the one Alberta clipper that moved into the Northern Plains on the Monday afternoon of January 20 was able to tap into deeper moisture from the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean as low pressure rapidly developed in the Mid- Atlantic States on Tuesday. The strengthening of low pressure occurred in response to the position of several jet streaks in the upper levels of the troposphere- one over the northern Gulf Coast and another over New England (image below). An arctic cold front dropped southward into the region Tuesday morning, allowing cold air to sink southward into the region and precipitation with this event to be snow. Snow began to move over the Potomac Highlands early Tuesday morning. Reagan National Airport and Southern Maryland were in the upper 30s around sunrise Tuesday morning. Temperatures just before the snow arrived were above freezing across the greater Baltimore and DC metropolitan area due to light easterly surface flow and abundant cloud cover on Monday night, but quickly dropped once snow started to fall (note: temperatures at the NWS forecast office in Sterling, VA drop 5 degrees in 15 minutes at the onset).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/29/21 01:04 PM UTC 938 WEATHER and FORECASTING VOLUME 17 of Subsequent Deep Moist Convection
    VOLUME 17 WEATHER AND FORECASTING OCTOBER 2002 Recognition of Negative Mesoscale Factors for Severe-Weather Potential: A Case Study CHARLES A. DOSWELL III* NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma DONALD V. B AKER NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Of®ce, Lubbock, Texas CHARLIE A. LILES NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Of®ce, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Manuscript received 2 November 2001, in ®nal form 23 April 2002) ABSTRACT The case of 7±8 June 1998 in eastern New Mexico and western Texas is used to illustrate the challenge of recognizing possible negative effects created by mesoscale processes. In this case, a region of cloud-covered cool air (which was associated with early thunderstorms) may have limited the tornadic potential of severe convection. Although the tornado potential in the synoptic situation was not highly portentous, supercell storms did eventually form, one of which was persistent for many hours. There were only relatively brief and weak tornadoes reported from this storm early in its life, despite its persistence as a long-lived supercell that produced a long swath of large hail. In this case, the development of thunderstorms east of the threat area early in the day maintained cloudiness that apparently inhibited the destabilization of the surface-based air mass over which the afternoon thunderstorms eventually moved. The persistent supercell formed on the dryline but overrode this mesoscale cool air mass relatively soon after it developed. It was able to persist as an elevated supercell despite the relatively stable near-surface air mass, but its tornadic production may have been limited by its interaction with this mesoscale feature.
    [Show full text]
  • In Numerical Forecasts of Mesoscale Convective Systems
    Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 49, 93-106 (1992) Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics ~ Springer-Verlag 1992 Printed in Austria 551.515.4 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, U.S.A. The Role of the Convective "Trigger Function" in Numerical Forecasts of Mesoscale Convective Systems J. S. Kain and J. M. Fritsch With 7 Figures Received November 18, 1991 Revised April 27, 1992 Summary sary to know the location and configuration of active convective cells that comprised mesoscale Three-dimensional numerical model simulations of a meso- convective systems. Consequently, convective scale convective system are performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the simulations to differences in the convective parameterization techniques typically relied on trigger function. The Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model empirically-based relationships between observed with the Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization scheme larger-scale processes and convective activity to is used as the modeling system for the study. All simulations predict when and where convection should occur. are performed on the June 10-11, 1985 squall line from the For example, some parameterizations were designed OK PRE-STORM field experiment. Individual simulations differ only in their specification of the trigger function within to initiate convection when a threshold value of the Kain-Fritsch scheme. Comparison of results from 12 hour mass or moisture convergence was exceeded at a simulations indicates that the position, timing, and intensity grid point where the atmosphere was conditionally
    [Show full text]