Koyukuk-Chandalar Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Koyukuk-Chandalar Region DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 532 ^ -J 4 THE KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR REGION ALASKA BY A. G. MADDREN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Preface, by Alfred H. Brooks __ 7 Introduction____________________________ ______ _ 9 Topography _ 11 General features _ _ __ 11 Relief______________-__-___________-__-___ 11 Yukon Flats_____________ _______________ 11 Hodzana highland 13 Koyukuk Flat and Valley________________________ 34 Endicott Mountains __ _______________ _ 15 Drainage __ _ i 15 Streams flowing southward to the Yukon_____________ 15 General features _ __ 15 Chandalar River and tributaries________________ 16 Orenzik, Hodzana, and Dall rivers __ __________ 21 Koyukuk drainage basin_ _ 22 Tributary streams _____________ 22 Kanuti River ____________________________ 23 South Fork of the Koyukuk and tributaries__________ 23 Middle Fork of the Koyukuk and tributaries________ 26 Climate__ - 27 Vegetation___ _ __ _ _ 28 Animal life - 29 Population and settlements___________________________ 29 Transportation and trails _ __ _ __ _ ___ 30 Geology ___ 32 Principal features _ 32 Geologic map 33 General section _ 34 Birch Creek schist (pre-Ordovician?)__ ____________.._ 34 General features____________________________ 34 Lithology, distribution, and structure_______________ 36 Dall River area__________________________ 36 Koyukuk-Chandalar area_______________________ 38 General features_____i_________________ 38 "Rapids" schist_______________________ 39 Amphibolite [hornblende] schist______________ 40 "Lake quartzite schist"___________________ 40 Intrusives___ _ _________ ______ 41 John River area_________________________ 44 Totsen "series"_______________1______ 44 Character and occurrence________ ________ 44 Structure ____ ____ __ 44 Age and correlation. __ 44 171453 4 CONTENTS. Geology Continued. Birch Creek schist (pre-Ordovician?) Continued. Page. Summary_________________________________ 45 Correlation _____________________________ 45 Structure. _,__________________ 46 Mineralization ______________;____________ 47 Paleozoic rocks _ __________________________ 49 Subdivisions_____________________________.._ 49 Devonian (?) rocks_______ _._____________ 50 Character and distribution,- .__________________ v 50 Age and correlation_^_____________________ 51 Carboniferous (?) rocks______________________ 51 Lithology, structure, and distribution_____________ 51 Age and correlation_____ ________________ 52 Mesozoic rocks ______ ___ _ _______________ 53 General features_______ ____ ______________ 53 Cretaceous system___ __ _ ______________ 54 Character, structure, and distribution__. _________ 54 Age and correlation______ ___(_____________ 54 Mesozoic (?) intrusive rocks___ ________________ 55 Cenozoic rocks ___ __________ ______'_________ 56 Tertiary system____ _______ _ __________, 56 Cenozoic lavas (Tertiary or Quaternary)______________ 56 Quaternary system _ __ _ 58 Pleistocene series _________________________ 58 Sediments _ _ : ___ __________ 53 Glaciation ___________________________ 60 Recent series __________ ______________ 66 Mining___________ _________ _____________ 68 Production ___.__ ________ _____________ 68 Methods of mining_______ ____i __________ 71 Surface mining _ __________ ______________ 71 Underground mining ________ ______________ 71 Costs and wages __________ -_____________ 72 Economic geology '_ ___ _~ 74 General conditions ____________ ________________ 74 Historical outline __ 76 Distribution and geologic association of gold____________ 77 Classes of placers ____ _ _ _ 78 Criteria for classification-_____________________ 78 Present stream placers_ ___ ___________ __ 78 Bench placers -:__________ __________'. _______ 79 Unconsolidated formations_____________________ 80 Summary of classification___________________ __ 80 Source of placer gold ___ _ ....___ 82 The placers __ 83 Koyukuk district________'___ __ ______ 83 Drainage basins __ ___ ____ 83 Middle Fork of Koyukuk River ____ ____ 84 Tramway Bar and Chapman Greek- i_ 84 Twelvemile Creek_____ _______._______ 85 Rose Creek ________ ________ 86 Porcupine Creek _______ _ 86 Slate and Myrtle creeks__ ___ 86 CONTENTS. 5 Economic geology Continued. The placers Continued. Koyukuk district Continued. Middle Fork of Koyukuk River Continued. Page. Clara Gulch ___________________.._____ 89 Kelly Gulch____________________________ 89 Marion Creek___________________________ 90 Emma Creek_______________-_________ 90 Wiseman Creek ________________________ 91 Nolan Creek and tributaries ______ ______ 92 General features _____________________ 92 Bench gravels_______________________ 93 Shallow gulch gravels_________________ 93 Deep frozen gravels___________________ 93 Character of gold__________,_________ 94 Minnie Creek _____ ________ _ _____ 94 Union Gulch___________________________ 95 Hammond Creek 95 Goldbottom, Swift, and Buckeye gulches 96 Vermont Creek________________________ 97 Streams between Hammond Creek and Gold Creek____ 99 Gold Creek ________________ __________ 99 Linda Creek _________________________ 102 Settles River and tributaries..- ____ 104 South Fork of Koyukuk River__________________ 105 General features __________________________ 105 Gold Bench and vicinity___________________ 105 Davis and other creeks___________________ 107 Headwaters of Glacier Creek________-_______ 107 North Fork of Koyukuk River_________________ 108 General features ______________________ -108 Mascot Creek________________________ 108 Wild River _____________________________ 109 John River ______________________________ 110 Dall and Hodzana River region_______.___________ 110 Cbandalar district ________________ ________ 110 General features _______________ ________ 110 Quartz lodes_____________________'._________ 111 Placers _________________ _ ______ 115 Index _ _ _ 117 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Topographic reconnaissance map of Koyukuk - Chandalar region___________________________________ In pocket. II. A, Hodzana highland, incised by upper valley of Fish Creek; B, Mountainous portion of Hodzana highland between upper forks of Bonanza Creek_______________________ 12 III. A, Weathering and wind erosion of granite at head of Dall River; B, Flats on Middle Fork of Koyukuk River__. _____ 14 IV. A, Endicott Mountains, in upper Dietrich River valley; B, Rapids on Chandalar River, 128 rniles above mouth______ 15 V. Geologic reconnaissance map of Koyukuk-Chandalar region. In pocket. VI. A, Limestone and schist contact in Endicott Mountains; B, Lime­ stone cliffs south of Bettles River, a possible fault scarp___ 34 VII. A, Pleistocene silt bluffs on Koyukuk River near Arctic Circle; B, Gold Creek valley near mouth_________________. 58 VIII. A, Horses towing freight scow, Middle Fork of Koyukuk River; B, Myrtle Creek valley_______________________ 86 I.. A, Nolaii Creek valley, shoeing principal mining plants; B, Nolan Creek valley, showing boiler house and dumps_____ 92 FIGURE 1. Map showing physiographic provinces of Koyukuk-Chandalar region _________________________ 12 2. Sketch map showing distribution of timber in Koyukuk-Chanda­ lar region .___ _________ _________ 28 6 PREFACE. By ALFRED H. BROOKS. In 1899 F. C. Schrader and T. G. Gerdine carried a topographic and geologic reconnaissance survey through the Chandalar and Ko- yukuk basins, in northern Alaska. This was the first investigation of the mineral resources north of the Yukon. The time was well chosen, for it was in 1899 that the first important discoveries of placer gold were made in the Koyukuk district, though there had been some mining on the river bars during the previous decade. Since 1899 the Koyukuk has produced gold to the value of about $2,500,000. Some promising gold-bearing veins have also been found in the Chan­ dalar region. As this progress in mining gave promise of yielding much new information about the occurrence of mineral deposits, and as Schra- der's report had long been out of print, a second investigation of this field seemed justified. This resurvey was made by A. G. Mad- dren in the course of a single field season, during which he visited practically all the important localities of mining and also consider­ ably extended the areal surveys. Mr. Maddren had the benefit of the geologic results achieved since 1899 in other parts of the Yukon basin, which have helped to elucidate a number of the stratigraphic problems. Although Mr. Maddren's conclusions as regards the geo­ logic sequence differ-somewhat from those reached by his predecessor in this field, yet this volume must in a measure be regarded as a revised edition of Schrader's report, which has proved remarkably accurate considering the conditions under which the field investiga­ tions were carried out. Other systematic surveys have recently been made in northern Alaska. In 1911 and 1912 Mr. Maddren carried a geologic survey northward from Porcupine River to the Arctic Ocean, along the international boundary (one hundred and forty-first meridian, west longitude). In 1910 and 1911 P. S. Smith made reconnaissance sur­ veys in the Kobuk and Noatak region, and the results of his work are embodied in a report 1 now in preparation, which will include a i Smith, P. S., The Noatak-Kobuk region, Alaska : Bull. U. S. Geol. Survey No. 536. 7 8 KOYUKUK-CHANDALAE REGION, ALASKA. geologic map of an area that extends eastward to the western bound­ ary of the area mapped in the present volume (PI. V, in pocket). These two maps will serve to elucidate the general geologic features of this
Recommended publications
  • Mapping Traditional Place Names Along the Koyukuk River—Koyukuk
    Mapping Traditional Place Names along the Koyukuk River— Koyukuk, Huslia, and Hughes, Western Interior Alaska Introduction Koyukon Athabascan peoples have settled along the Koyukuk River in Western Interior Alaska for thousands of years using the surrounding landscape for subsistence and cultural resources. However, recent changes in climate, technology, resource availability, and way of life have affected land-use patterns in the region, as well as use of the Denaakk'e (Koyukon) language. The current Koyukon population is about 2,300, and about 150 still speak the language (the youngest of whom are in their fifties). In addition, Elders, important keepers of both language and traditional subsistence-use areas, are aging, and opportunities to record their knowledge are diminishing. “If place names are left undocumented then the owners and history of those places remain invisible. Place names provide clear evidence of land use and demonstrate Native presence in an area” Study area map representing the 366 spatially verified place names along the Koyukuk River from Koyukuk to Hughes. Gary Holton, Director of the Alaska Native Language Archive, Alaska Native Language Center Project Goals The goals of the place names project are to collect, preserve, cultivate, and pass on the rich knowledge and culture of the Koyukon people with regards to traditional place names and subsistence-use areas along the Koyukuk River in the villages of Koyukuk, Huslia, and Hughes. Place names provide important information regarding navigation, resource availability, cultural history, land ownership, and changes in land use. Archiving information of this nature assists in passing local and traditional knowledge to subsequent generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Land Use Processes in Alaska's Koyukuk River Area
    ARCTIC VOL. 42. NO. 2 (JUNE 1989) P. 148-162 Historic Land Use Processes in Alaska’s Koyukuk River Area WENDY H. ARUNDALE‘ and ELIZA JONES’ (Received 9 February 1988; accepted in revised form 21 September 1988) ABSTRACT. Northern Athabaskans with extensive knowledge of their traditional history and culture are increasingly interested in preserving their heritage. The authors areworking with Allakaket area Koyukon people in Alaska to record data on importanthistoric sites and events, but they are also using ethnoarchaeological approaches, particularly Binford’s models of settlement systems and site mobility, to help make the information they gather more valuable to both local Native people and archaeologists. Drawing on their preliminary data, as well as existing research, they describe changes in the late winter part of the seasonal round, showing how, over time, the Koyukon become more logistically organized as they become more sedentary. These changes have interesting archaeological implications, including effects on site mobility patterns. The Koyukon belief system, withan intricate set of traditional beliefs and practices, has significant, though largely unexplored potential for influencing archaeological variability. Key words: Alaska, Athabaskans, archaeology, belief systems, boreal forest, ethnoarchaeology, historic archaeology, historic sites, Koyukon, Koyukuk River, landscape use, settlement patterns, Subarctic RÉSUMÉ. Les Athabaskans du Nord qui possèdent une connaissance approfondie de leur histoire et de leur culture traditionnelles, sont de plus en plus intéressés à préserver leur patrimoine. Les auteurs travaillent actuellement avec des gens de la tribu Koyukon de la région d’Allakaket en Alaska, à consigner des données sur d’importants sites et événements historiques, mais ils utilisent aussi des approches ethnoarchéologiques, en particulier les modèles de Binford se rapportant aux systèmes de peuplement et de migration d’un site à l’autre, pour rendre l’information recueille plus utile, àla fois à la population autochtoneet aux archéologues.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanning the Bering Strait
    National Park service shared beringian heritage Program U.s. Department of the interior Spanning the Bering Strait 20 years of collaborative research s U b s i s t e N c e h UN t e r i N c h UK o t K a , r U s s i a i N t r o DU c t i o N cean Arctic O N O R T H E L A Chu a e S T kchi Se n R A LASKA a SIBERIA er U C h v u B R i k R S otk S a e i a P v I A en r e m in i n USA r y s M l u l g o a a S K S ew la c ard Peninsu r k t e e r Riv n a n z uko i i Y e t R i v e r ering Sea la B u s n i CANADA n e P la u a ns k ni t Pe a ka N h las c A lf of Alaska m u a G K W E 0 250 500 Pacific Ocean miles S USA The Shared Beringian Heritage Program has been fortunate enough to have had a sustained source of funds to support 3 community based projects and research since its creation in 1991. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev expanded their cooperation in the field of environmental protection and the study of global change to create the Shared Beringian Heritage Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25
    Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25 $UFWLF9LOODJH &KDQGDODU :LVHPDQ &KULVWLDQ &ROGIRRW 9HQHWLH &KDON\LWVLN )RUW<XNRQ %HDYHU %LUFK&UHHN 6WHYHQV9LOODJH )RUW+DPOLQ &LUFOH &HQWUDO 5DPSDUW /LYHQJRRG &LUFOH+RW6SULQJV (XUHND 0LQWR )R[ &KHQD )$,5%$1.6 +RW (DJOH 6SULQJV Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 115 Unit 25 / Hunting (See Unit 25 Fort Yukon map) Unit 25 consists of the Yukon River drainage upstream from (but excluding) the Hamlin Creek drainage; and excluding drainages into the south bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Charley River. Unit 25A consists of the Hodzana River drainage rivers; and drainages into the north bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Narrows; the Chandalar River drainage upstream from Circle, including the islands in the Yukon upstream from (and including) the East Fork drainage; River. the Christian River drainage upstream from Christian; the Unit 25C consists of drainages into the south bank of Sheenjek River drainage upstream from (and including) the the Yukon River upstream from Circle to the Unit 20E Thluichohnjik Creek; the Coleen River drainage; and the boundary; the Birch Creek drainage upstream from the Old Crow River drainage. Steese Highway bridge (milepost 147); the Preacher Creek Unit 25B consists of the Little Black River drainage drainage upstream from (and including) the Rock Creek upstream from (but excluding) the Big Creek drainage; drainage; and the Beaver Creek drainage upstream from the Black River drainage upstream from (and including) (and including) the Moose Creek drainage. the Salmon Fork drainage; the Porcupine River drainage Unit 25D consists of the remainder of Unit 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Tad Ful ª«Mp 109
    ! ! ! ! Middle Fork Koyukuk River !S H !S ª«MP 157 i k Malamute Fork M Alaska-Other d a e la d m M Doyon, Limited e e u S r t m e u n F a C o d l G Doyon, Limited ly C r g k C ª«MP 156 r C a r r n e e n i r k e e i t e k t e e a !S k e e e r C k !S C r K !S e k Ninemile k River R e e ku k re oyu n C Lake Alaska-Other K h le H o i a J B !S m !S r e ne r !S D ar i ie a ª«MP 154 N !S C t v r Central i e C s e r k Evansville, Incorporated C r e Yukon Field e e r ! P k ! e v i o e p k R e Office C d r ª«MP 153 l e i e k k MP 152 W e ª« Goose e r H Slough C yling u MP 151 ra Cr d e G e Alaska-Other l ª« e s k H g Horseshoe o a a c n Doyon, Limited k E e Eld B Grayling Lake tt or C ad a MP 150ª« Lake r o y e !S e C C FUL k r Doyon, Limited e r ! e e Jac e k W k hit k W Jane Creek J e C e o re ª«MP 149 s h ek t n k F e o R e r i r k v C H e e r MOD ª«MP 148 m n o s t h t a Hill Lake o w !S !S b !S Birch y C ª«MP 147 !S Squaw Creek k r !!S !S !S! c e !! !!S!!!!!S e Evansville! !! !S o !!!!! !S!!S k !! !!S !!S!! R !S ! "!S ! ! !S! !!! Bettles!S!!!!! Airport !!!S! ª«MP 146 CRI !!S!!!! !S !!!S !!S Alaska-Other !S!!!!! ! ! ! p !S ª«MP 145 Bettles LIM " ª«MP 144 !S Doyon, Limited Vor Lake Waterlane Seaplane Base ek re C ª«MP 143 s !Sp la g u E o a D s MOD t F Kanuti ª«MP 142 o r k National Evansville, Incorporated H e n Wildlife Refuge Central Yukon Field Office s ª«MP 141 h a w C ! ª«MP 140 r e FUL e Prospect k ª«MP 139 Creek MOD !S !S ª« MP 138 Prospect Creek Airport Doyon, Limited !S p k ª«MP 137 ree Fickett Creek k C la FUL ya Doyon, Limited Kanuti
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum (W&SRS)
    OI'TIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1M2 O:DITION GSA FPMR (~1 Cl'l<) 101•11.1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum (W&SRS) TO Assistant Director Eastman DATE: May 30, 1973 FROM Alaska Task Force Leader ./ su~EcT: Tinayguk Wild and Scenic River Report. Enclo~ed are two copies of a ·prelimi ary draft of Chapters IV and V of the subj~ct report. opy of this report has been provided to NWRO and BLM, · SF&W NPS and FS planriirig t~ams in Anchorage. Chapter IV w1 1 be distributed to study team participants. ~ · ·It is emphasized that the conclusions and recommendations are based upon a single ·aerial examination of June 14, 1972, and upon office review of available information. On-site field examination is scheduled for this summer. Following field work, the preliminary draft will be revised as appropriate and the remaining portions of the report completed. Tileston / 2 Enclosures cc: WASO/Fred Strack ARLIS Alaska Resources .,.ft.~- . Library & Information SerVices · Anchorage Alaska Buy U.S. SfWings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan IOIO•lot ,JINAYGUK RIVER, ALASKA --- A Wild and Scenic Rj.ver Analysis • THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW 90-542, THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT. PUBLICATION OF THE FINDINGS AND RECOM- MENDATIONS HEREIN SHOULD NOT, -BE CONSTRUED AS REPRESENTING EITHER THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. THE PURPOSE OF THE REPORT IS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AND ALTERNA­ TIVES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION BY THE BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION, THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES. Bureau of Outdoor Recreati6n Alaska Task Force PRELIMINARY DRAFT--­ NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRI~ BUTION DR PUBLIC USE ---SUBJECT TO REVISION v.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Run Timing of Adult Salmon in Three Tributaries of the Koyukuk River, Alaska, 2002
    Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2003-7, August 2005 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Abundance and Run Timing of Adult Salmon in Three Tributaries of the Koyukuk River, Alaska, 2002 Gareth K. VanHatten Abstract During 2002, resistance board weirs were used to record escapement information from Chinook Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and summer chum O. keta salmon in three tributaries within the Koyukuk River drainage, Alaska: Gisasa River; Kateel River; and Henshaw Creek. Annual escapement counts were 2,025 Chinook and 33,481 chum salmon for Gisasa River, 73 Chinook and 2,853 chum salmon for Kateel River, and 649 Chinook and 25,249 chum salmon for Henshaw Creek. Additional biological information was collected on age, sex, and length of each spawning population. Passage information was also recorded for longnose sucker Catostomus catostomus, northern pike Esox lucius, Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus, and whitefish (Coregoninae). Chinook and summer chum salmon escapement counts from these three tributaries assist fisheries managers in making in-season decisions during the Yukon River commercial and subsistence fishing season, provide post-season evaluation of various management practices, and assist in developing future run projections. Due to the complexity of the mixed- stock Yukon River fishery and the difficulty in managing specific stocks, it is essential to continue collecting information from individual salmon populations, including stocks from the Koyukuk River drainage. It is recommended that the Gisasa River (lower Koyukuk River) and Henshaw Creek projects (upper Koyukuk River) be continued for the long term, so population trends can be analyzed over an extended time-series. Tributary streams containing small salmon stocks, like the Kateel River, should be monitored on a periodic basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Five
    CHAPTER 5: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination 5 Consultation and Coordination 5.1 Introduction This section summarizes the public and agency outreach program the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has undertaken for the proposed land exchange. Pre-scoping meetings were held in early 2005, before the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was initiated, in Anchorage, Arctic Village, Beaver, Birch Creek, Central, Chalkyitsik, Circle, Fairbanks, Fort Yukon, Stevens Village, and Venetie. These meetings provided the public with the opportunity to review the Agreement in Principle (Appendix A) and the Service document, “Evaluation and Review of a Proposed Land Exchange and Acquisition of Native Lands,” and were part of a 6- month comment period. In response to requests from the public and from Doyon, Limited (Doyon), the Service agreed to prepare an EIS and engage in the second phase of outreach, formal scoping. 5.2 Formal Scoping The Service published a Notice of Intent for the Proposed Land Exchange in the Federal Register on October 19, 2005 (Federal Register, Volume 70, Number 201, Pages 60845-60846). The Notice of Intent included a summary of the proposed project, the draft alternatives, and issues of concern raised during pre-scoping. A separate notice published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2006 (Federal Register, Volume 71, Number 42, Page 10988), announced the locations, dates, and times of public scoping meetings in Anchorage and Fairbanks, and names of Yukon Flats villages where scoping meetings were to be held. The March 3, 2006, notice stated that comments would be accepted until April 15, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Et Fish Creek Lake Minnkokut Lake
    153°0'0"W 152°0'0"W 151°0'0"W 150°0'0"W Malamute Fork Malamute Fork Smally Creek Harriet Creek Ninemile Lake Mud Creek Pope Creek Ninemile Cabin Bear Creek 67°0'0"N 67°0'0"N Ninemile Creek Hackett Creek East Fork Henshaw Creek Davis Creek Goose Slough Eagle Creek John R Creek Ironsides Bar Mine Gold Bench Placer Mine Horseshoe Lake Hudson Bay Creek Rockybottom Creek Jack White Creek IPS Jack White Range IPS Grayling Lake Helpmejack Creek Wild River WLM Birch Hill IPS Eldorado Creek Pitchuk Lake Pope Creek Dome Alatna Hills Birch Hill Lake Evansville IPS Evansville Squaw Creek Grayling Creek John River ALM WLM BeWttlLeMseWLtM tleALsM WID ALM IPS IPS IPS IPS WLM Lookout Mountain FLO IPS Jane Creek IPS WLM IPS SPB Douglas Creek IPS WLM IPS WLM IPS IPS SPB Lake No IPS IPS rutak Four Corners IPS West Fork Henshaw Creek IPS Prospect Creek Camp Prospect Creek Jim River IPS IPS Chebanika Creek IPS West Fork Henshaw Creek IPB East Fork Henshaw Creek IPS Fickett Creek Henshaw Cabin IPS Sinyalak Creek Siruk Creek West Fork Henshaw (Sozhekla) CreekEast Fork Henshaw (Sozhekla) Hawzerah Lake IPSHawzerah Creek IPS Oscars Cabin Double Point Mountain ALM North Fork Bonanza CreekSouth Fork Bonanza Creek Black Jack Cabin IPS IPS IPS WLM Buzodoc Slough Fish IPS Peavey CreekIPS IPS IPS Dosennaughten Lake IPS Kanuti Flats IPS IPS IPS IPS WLM Fish Creek Cree k IPS Alatna IPS IPS WLM Holdeyeit Lake IPS Fish Creek Lake IPSBonanza Creek IPSIPSIPS Minotocloga Lake Tabeascot Lake IPS ALM IPS IPS WLMSouth Fork Koyukuk River IPS IPS WLM IPSIPS WLM WLM Hulgothen Bluffs
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou Trails 2005
    Tuttut tumai (Inupiaq) bedzeyh tene Caribou Trails (Koyukon Athabaskan) tuntut tumait (Yup’ik) Photo by Sue Steinacher issue 7 spring 2005 News from The Western Arctic Caribou Herd working group Your 2005 Being a caribou hunter Caribou Working Group in the 21st century Representatives: Being a good hunter is no longer just about keeping your rifle, boat Wainwright and snowmachine in good working order, and watching the weather and Vacant signs of wildlife. If there is to be game to hunt in the future we also have to pay attention to developments planned for the land our wildlife depends on. Point Hope Earl ‘Natchiq’ Kingik, Pt. Hope Being a good hunter now also means reading, listening and Nuiqsut & Anaktuvuk talking about things we never used Isaac Kaigelak, Nuiqsut to have to think about. Sometimes Noatak & Kivalina it means going to meetings instead Raymond Hawley, Kivalina of hunting, and speaking before a group of people even when it feels Kotzebue Attamuk Shiedt, Sr., Kotzebue uncomfortable. Lower Kobuk River The world is changing Raymond Stoney, Kiana rapidly. Some of these changes Billy Adams on the trail. Photo by Craig George. have improved the quality of our life Upper Kobuk River in the North, like advanced communications, transportation and health care. Sally Custer, Shungnak But it’s important to recognize that development can affect important wildlife Koyukuk River habitat and populations - the game we depend upon. Pollock Simon, Sr., Allakaket Knowledge and Middle Yukon River involvement are now critical Benedict Jones, Koyukuk hunting tools. We need to learn to Buckland, Deering, Selawik use them wisely in order to protect Ron Moto, Deering the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Biological Sampling of Nonsalmon Fish Species in the Yukon Flats Region, Alaska
    Technical Paper No. 362 Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Biological Sampling of Nonsalmon Fish Species in the Yukon Flats Region, Alaska by Michael Koskey, University of Alaska Fairbanks and Kristin Mull, Bureau of Land Management May 2011 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the reports by the Division of Subsistence. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, symbols deciliter dL all commonly-accepted and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to mile mi Company Co. harvest per unit effort HPUE nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Controls on Recent Alaskan Lake Changes Identified from Water Isotopes and Remote Sensing Lesleigh Anderson USGS, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 2013 Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing Lesleigh Anderson USGS, [email protected] Jennifer Rover Earth Resource Observation and Science, U.S. Geological Survey Nikki Gaulager Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge Jean Birks Alberta Innovates Technology Futures Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Anderson, Lesleigh; Rover, Jennifer; Gaulager, Nikki; and Birks, Jean, "Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing" (2013). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 801. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/801 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 40, 3413–3418, doi:10.1002/grl.50672, 2013 Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing Lesleigh Anderson,1 Jean Birks,2 Jennifer Rover,3 and Nikki Guldager4 Received 13 May 2013; revised 13 June 2013; accepted 16 June 2013; published 12 July 2013. [1] High-latitude lakes are important for terrestrial carbon regions [Riordan et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2005]. Lake sur- dynamics and waterfowl habitat driving a need to better face observations are available in Alaska from early aerial understand controls on lake area changes.
    [Show full text]